09.08.2013 Views

Link to Fulltext

Link to Fulltext

Link to Fulltext

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Calibration<br />

6.1 Time calibration<br />

During the first calibration phase, right after deployment at the South Pole, a YAG laser was<br />

used <strong>to</strong> measure all the time delays due <strong>to</strong> different cable-lengths and transit times in the<br />

<br />

PMs<br />

) which have <strong>to</strong> be subtracted from subsequent leading-edge measurements. An optical fiber<br />

( <br />

ending at an isotropizing nylon ball right below each OM was used <strong>to</strong> send light from the surface<br />

with the YAG-laser. The data thus acquired was then used <strong>to</strong> make the in-situ time-calibration<br />

of the detec<strong>to</strong>r. The distance between the nylon ball and the OM is typically less than a meter<br />

(much less than one scattering length in ice), so that we can safely assume that all hits are direct<br />

(unscattered).<br />

Since the pulses arriving at the surface have traveled through nearly 2000 meters of coaxial<br />

cable, they are very stretched, with typical t.o.t.’s of 550 ns and rise-times of 180 ns. The<br />

threshold used is set <strong>to</strong> the same value for all pulses and this means that small ones, with a slow<br />

rise-time, are measured as coming very late, compared <strong>to</strong> those with larger amplitudes.<br />

In order <strong>to</strong> account for that effect, a correction based on the measured ADC value is used<br />

(see Eq. 55 and Fig. 34).<br />

Trigger level<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure 33: Time-walk due <strong>to</strong> constant level discrimina<strong>to</strong>r<br />

This is the fit of the leading-edge versus ADC plots made, in order <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> make timewalk<br />

corrections, i.e. <strong>to</strong> correct for differences in time measurements due <strong>to</strong> different pulse amplitudes<br />

(see Fig.<br />

£ <br />

33):<br />

¡£¢ ¢<br />

(55)<br />

where C is an arbitrary constant. An example of such a fit is shown in Fig. 34.<br />

In some data-taking runs, the TDC trigger level for several of the OMs was changed; this had<br />

also <strong>to</strong> be taken in<strong>to</strong> account. When the threshold on some PM was lowered from the 100 mV<br />

calibration value <strong>to</strong> a new value, the formula above had <strong>to</strong> be modified <strong>to</strong> the form:<br />

<br />

¢<br />

£ ¢ ¡<br />

¡<br />

¡ ¢<br />

(with <br />

, the new threshold, in mV). However, this fit is neither good for <strong>to</strong>o low ADC values,<br />

where noise becomes a concern, nor for <strong>to</strong>o large values, where saturation effects enter. Light<br />

cuts can be applied on the ADC values in an off-line analysis <strong>to</strong> improve the time measurements.<br />

This way, a time resolution ¥ of ns is achieved at the ¡ § gain voltage at which the detec<strong>to</strong>r is<br />

operated for normal data-taking (see Fig. 35).<br />

44<br />

(56)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!