09.08.2013 Views

Snapshots of International Community Forestry Networks: Country ...

Snapshots of International Community Forestry Networks: Country ...

Snapshots of International Community Forestry Networks: Country ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Learning from <strong>International</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>: India Report<br />

Pandey and Dr Rabindranath. A monograph on experiences <strong>of</strong> CF in Eastern India was published in<br />

collaboration with researchers at IIFM. Some <strong>of</strong> the publications were translated into Oriya and Hindi, but<br />

not to a great extent. In West Bengal Dr. Mark P<strong>of</strong>fenberger collaborated with Pr<strong>of</strong>. SB Roy <strong>of</strong> IBRAD on<br />

mapping and techniques <strong>of</strong> cluster analysis (e.g. how a number <strong>of</strong> villages share their resources, etc.)<br />

Publications were shared with various organisations and individuals. Many AFN activities were centred in<br />

Orissa in the past.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the problems <strong>of</strong> interviewing people about AFN activities was that not many people make the<br />

distinction between the activities <strong>of</strong> AFN and Dr. Mark P<strong>of</strong>fenberger. In this sense, the AFN did not seem<br />

to have a strong identity as a network. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons may also have been the informal nature <strong>of</strong><br />

membership.<br />

Links with national networks: While in Ford, Dr. Mark P<strong>of</strong>fenberger was instrumental in encouraging and<br />

supporting the formation <strong>of</strong> the SPWD-JFM national network. Thereafter the AFN kept in close touch with<br />

individuals active within the national network. He was also instrumental in initiating the Foresters’<br />

Network.<br />

Regional <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Forestry</strong> Training Centre (RECOFTC) and Forest Trees and People<br />

Programme (FTPP): There has been a great deal <strong>of</strong> overlap between the activities <strong>of</strong> RECOFTC and<br />

FTPP in India, because the FTPP programme in India has been routed through RECOFTC, which acted as<br />

the regional nodal point. Most people do not distinguish between the activities <strong>of</strong> the two networks, and<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten use the names interchangeably. However, people did distinguish between the two networks with<br />

regard to their newsletters, and RECOFTC’s independent training programmes in Bangkok. Three institutes<br />

collaborated closely with RECOFTC/FTPP – IIFM, SPWD and IBRAD, from the mid-1990s up to 2000.<br />

The origin <strong>of</strong> the collaboration was an invitation from FTPP to IBRAD and SPWD representatives to attend<br />

the first regional FTPP network meeting in RECOFTC (Bangkok), where there were representatives from<br />

7-8 other countries as well. The participants were told that FTPP was starting a network with the objective<br />

<strong>of</strong> periodically sharing experiences and facilitating training activities, and that the network would also<br />

provide some small grants for network activities in the different countries. It was decided that the network<br />

would meet annually in different member countries. However there was never a meeting organised in India<br />

because this would have excluded members from Pakistan (and vice-versa). IIFM joined the network at a<br />

later stage.<br />

The main collaboration with RECOFTC was in conducting two ‘travelling’ international training<br />

programmes on “Participatory Forest Resource Assessment (PFRA) and Planning”, with participants from<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> Asia. Over 21 days, the trainees spent 6 days each in Delhi (SPWD), Bhopal (IIFM) and<br />

Calcutta (IBRAD). It was an expensive programme, costing about US $4000 per participant. The objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course were to “develop skills in PFRA and monitoring; increase understanding on approaches and<br />

methods in implementing PFRA; and identify ways to apply strategies and approaches learned in the course<br />

back in the participants’ own work situation.” 32 In 1999 two Indian forest <strong>of</strong>ficers and one SPWD<br />

representative were sponsored for training. Judging from an evaluation done for the 1998 programme, the<br />

responses to the training were mixed. While field work was perceived as mostly well organised and content<br />

was overall interesting with useful material being given out, negative comments included badly presented<br />

lectures, bad time-keeping, and dominating resource persons. 33<br />

In 1996-97 IIFM developed several case studies required for the training programme, in collaboration with<br />

RECOFTC. A writing workshop was organised twice with RECOFTC, with AFN partially supporting the<br />

effort. Participants from Asia, including India, visited RECOFTC in Bangkok and wrote about 10 case<br />

studies while there, on different subjects like conflicts, NTFP or institutional aspects <strong>of</strong> CF, for the Asian<br />

region. A format was also developed for writing case studies for trainers to use as teaching material. One <strong>of</strong><br />

the case studies written at IIFM was on self-initiated forest protection by communities in Kudada<br />

32<br />

Anon. 1999. Pamphlet on training course on “Participatory Forest Resource Assessment and Planning.”<br />

RECOFTC. Bangkok.<br />

33<br />

Fuller, J. 1998. Participatory Resource Assessment and Planning, India 1998 RECOFTC / IIFM/<br />

IBRAD /SPWD Course Review. Unpublished.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!