10.08.2013 Views

Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy

Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy

Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

References<br />

<strong>Passenger</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Mode</strong><br />

<strong>Shares</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

<strong>Passenger</strong> transport mode share refers to the<br />

percentage of passenger journeys or trips by<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> mode of transport and is typically<br />

reported through travel surveys. Compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

passenger transport mode share across<br />

different cities is a challeng<strong>in</strong>g task. As travel<br />

surveys are typically conducted for long-term<br />

strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g purpose, such surveys are<br />

not conducted frequently and detailed reports<br />

are not always published. The situation is<br />

further complicated as the surveys are often<br />

commissioned by local governments. The<br />

geographical areas covered, sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g techniques, questionnaire and<br />

stratification methods deployed by travel<br />

surveys vary greatly <strong>in</strong> different countries.<br />

For example, the def<strong>in</strong>ition for a pedestrian<br />

trip or a public transport trip may be different<br />

<strong>in</strong> different countries. In cities like Hong<br />

Kong, mode share is based on the number of<br />

board<strong>in</strong>gs by mode of transport (or journeystages).<br />

In most cities, however, mode share<br />

is reported on the basis of the number of<br />

journeys, which may consist of a series of<br />

board<strong>in</strong>gs on different modes of transport and<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> mode is reported as the transport<br />

mode.<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share is affected by household <strong>in</strong>comes,<br />

land use patterns, and many other economic<br />

and social factors. Therefore, the figures may<br />

not be directly comparable. They should be<br />

60 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

analysed together with the historical, social<br />

and economic situation of the city.<br />

The mode share <strong>in</strong>formation of some major<br />

metropolitan cities <strong>in</strong> the world is presented.<br />

They <strong>in</strong>clude the traditionally advanced<br />

cities (e.g. London, Paris, New York and<br />

Tokyo), newly developed cities (e.g. Hong<br />

Kong, Seoul), cities often cited <strong>in</strong> transport<br />

<strong>in</strong>novations or susta<strong>in</strong>able transport surveys<br />

(e.g. Bogota, Osaka), and emerg<strong>in</strong>g megacities<br />

(e.g. Shanghai, Bangalore) (Table 1).<br />

For cities where mode share <strong>in</strong>formation of<br />

different geographical coverage is available,<br />

the geographical area that is approximately <strong>in</strong><br />

a similar pattern to S<strong>in</strong>gapore is used (e.g. land<br />

area, population density).<br />

Table 1: List of Selected <strong>Cities</strong><br />

Asia<br />

Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Delhi,<br />

Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Mumbai, Osaka,<br />

Seoul, Shanghai, S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Taipei, Tokyo<br />

Australia<br />

Melbourne, Sydney<br />

Europe<br />

Barcelona, Berl<strong>in</strong>, London, Madrid, Paris,<br />

Prague, Rome, Vienna<br />

North America<br />

Chicago, New York City, Toronto<br />

South America<br />

Bogota, Curitiba


AHMEDABAD<br />

Population: 5.6 million<br />

Land area: 281 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 16% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Census of India 2011<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />

and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> India<br />

BANGALORE<br />

Population: 8.4 million<br />

Land area: 226 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 35% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Census of India 2011<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />

and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> India<br />

BARCELONA<br />

Population: 1.5 million<br />

Land area: 98 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 26% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />

A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />

Figure 1: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Ahmedabad<br />

JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Paratransit<br />

6%<br />

Cycle<br />

14%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

16%<br />

Figure 2: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Bangalore<br />

Walk<br />

26%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

35%<br />

Figure 3: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Barcelona<br />

Walk<br />

38%<br />

Walk<br />

22%<br />

Taxi<br />

1%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

26%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

42%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

25%<br />

Cycle<br />

7%<br />

Paratransit<br />

7%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

35%<br />

References<br />

61


CHICAGO<br />

Population: 2.7 million<br />

Land area: 589 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 16% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Chicago Regional Household Travel Inventory: <strong>Mode</strong> Choice<br />

and Trip Purpose for the 2008 and 1990 Surveys, Chicago<br />

Metropolitan Agency for Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CURITIBA<br />

Population: 1.9 million<br />

Land area: 430 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 45% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

ICLEI EcoMobility Case “Curitiba, Brazil - A model of transit<br />

oriented plann<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

DELHI<br />

Population: 11.0 million<br />

Land area: 431 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 42% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Census of India 2011<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />

and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> India<br />

Figure 7: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Chicago<br />

Walk<br />

19%<br />

Figure 8: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Curitiba<br />

Figure 9: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Delhi<br />

JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Bus<br />

11%<br />

Bus & BRT<br />

45%<br />

Walk<br />

21%<br />

Rail<br />

5%<br />

Taxi<br />

1%<br />

Others<br />

1%<br />

Cycle<br />

5%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

42%<br />

Cycle<br />

1%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

63%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

28%<br />

Walk<br />

21%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

19%<br />

Cycle<br />

12%<br />

Paratransit<br />

6%<br />

References<br />

63


MADRID<br />

Population: 3.1 million<br />

Land area: 606 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 34% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />

A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />

MELBOURNE<br />

Population: 4.1 million<br />

Land area: 1,566 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 8% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity 2007<br />

MUMBAI<br />

Population: 12.5 million<br />

Land area: 603 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 45% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Census of India 2011<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />

and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> India<br />

Figure 13: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Madrid<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

34%<br />

Figure 14: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Melbourne<br />

Walk<br />

13%<br />

Figure 15: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Mumbai<br />

JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Bus<br />

Rail 3%<br />

4%<br />

Walk<br />

27%<br />

Cycle<br />

2%<br />

Taxi<br />

1%<br />

Walk<br />

36%<br />

Others<br />

1%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

45%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

29%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

77%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

15%<br />

Paratransit<br />

7%<br />

Cycle<br />

6%<br />

References<br />

65


References<br />

NEW YORK<br />

Population: 8.2 million<br />

Land area: 790 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 23% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Census 2010, U.S. Census Bureau<br />

National Household Travel Survey 2009, New York City<br />

OSAKA<br />

Population: 2.7 million<br />

Land area: 222 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 34% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Osaka Prefecture Travel Report 2000 (<strong>in</strong> Japanese only, 大<br />

阪府全体の人の動き 第4回パーソントリップ調査から,<br />

Japan)<br />

PARIS (Paris et Petite Couronne) 3<br />

Population: 6.5 million<br />

Land area: 762 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 62% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

National <strong>Transport</strong> Survey 2008 (<strong>in</strong> French only, Enquête<br />

Nationale <strong>Transport</strong>s et Déplacements)<br />

66 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Figure 16: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> New York<br />

Walk<br />

39%<br />

Others<br />

6%<br />

Figure 17: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Osaka<br />

Walk<br />

27%<br />

Rail<br />

32%<br />

Bus<br />

10%<br />

Bus<br />

2%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

33%<br />

Rail<br />

12%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

39%<br />

Figure 18: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Paris et Petite Couronne<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

62%<br />

Cycle<br />

1%<br />

Taxi<br />

1%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

32%<br />

Walk<br />

4%


PRAGUE<br />

Population: 1.2 million<br />

Land area: 496 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 43% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

The Yearbook of <strong>Transport</strong>ation 2009, Prague<br />

ROME<br />

Population: 3.7 million<br />

Land area: 1,290 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 20% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />

A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />

SEOUL<br />

Population: 10.6 million<br />

Land area: 605 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes only motorised<br />

modes for all purposes. Mass transit<br />

constitutes 63% of motorised journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Seoul Statistics – Population Trend <strong>in</strong> 2010<br />

Seoul Statistics – Composition of Daily <strong>Passenger</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> 2009<br />

Figure 19: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Prague<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

43%<br />

Figure 20: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Rome<br />

Figure 21: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Seoul<br />

JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

20%<br />

Walk<br />

21%<br />

Bus<br />

28%<br />

Cycle<br />

1%<br />

Rail<br />

35%<br />

Walk<br />

23%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

33%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

59%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

26%<br />

Taxi<br />

6%<br />

Others<br />

5%<br />

References<br />

67


References<br />

SHANGHAI 4<br />

Population: 16.4 million<br />

Land area: 2,141 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 33% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Shanghai Yearbook 2011<br />

Shanghai Construction and <strong>Transport</strong> Commission 2009<br />

(data provided directly)<br />

SINGAPORE<br />

Population: 5.1 million<br />

Land area: 712 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 44% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gapore <strong>in</strong> Figures 2011<br />

Travel Survey 2011, Land <strong>Transport</strong> Authority, S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />

SYDNEY<br />

Population: 4.6 million<br />

Land area: 1,580 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 11% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

2009/10 Household Travel Survey-Key Indicators for Sydney<br />

Figure 22: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Shanghai<br />

68 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Figure 23: <strong>Mode</strong> share <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />

Rail<br />

19%<br />

Walk<br />

22%<br />

Taxi<br />

4%<br />

Cycle<br />

1%<br />

Figure 24: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Sydney<br />

Walk<br />

18%<br />

Walk<br />

27%<br />

Bus<br />

6%<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

33%<br />

Rail<br />

5%<br />

Others<br />

2%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

20%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

29%<br />

Bus<br />

25%<br />

E-bike<br />

10%<br />

Cycle<br />

10%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

69%


References<br />

VIENNA<br />

Population: 1.6 million<br />

Land area: 415 km 2<br />

<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />

Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />

mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />

purposes. Mass transit constitutes 36% of all<br />

journeys.<br />

Data Sources:<br />

Vienna Modal Split 2010 (<strong>in</strong> German only, APA-Grafik<br />

Modal Split, Wiener)<br />

Notes<br />

1. For Beij<strong>in</strong>g, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area,<br />

which is only part of the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Municipality.<br />

2. For Guangzhou, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the central districts (i.e.<br />

Liwan, Yuexiu, Haizhu, Tianhe, Baiyun, Huangpu) only,<br />

which is only part of the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the<br />

Guangzhou Municipality.<br />

3. For Paris, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the city of Paris and the surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />

districts collectively called “Petite Couronne” (Little<br />

Crown, or Inner R<strong>in</strong>g): Hauts-de-Se<strong>in</strong>e, Se<strong>in</strong>e-Sa<strong>in</strong>t-<br />

Denis and Val-de-Marne.<br />

Figure 28: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Vienna<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

36%<br />

70 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />

Cycle<br />

5%<br />

Walk<br />

28%<br />

Private<br />

transport<br />

31%<br />

4. For Shanghai, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area<br />

and the Pudong New District, which is only part of the<br />

area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Shanghai Municipality.<br />

5. For Tokyo, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area<br />

collectively called “23-Ward”, which is only part of<br />

the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Tokyo Metropolitan<br />

Government (TMG).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!