Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy
Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy
Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities - LTA Academy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
References<br />
<strong>Passenger</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Mode</strong><br />
<strong>Shares</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />
<strong>Passenger</strong> transport mode share refers to the<br />
percentage of passenger journeys or trips by<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> mode of transport and is typically<br />
reported through travel surveys. Compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
passenger transport mode share across<br />
different cities is a challeng<strong>in</strong>g task. As travel<br />
surveys are typically conducted for long-term<br />
strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g purpose, such surveys are<br />
not conducted frequently and detailed reports<br />
are not always published. The situation is<br />
further complicated as the surveys are often<br />
commissioned by local governments. The<br />
geographical areas covered, sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g techniques, questionnaire and<br />
stratification methods deployed by travel<br />
surveys vary greatly <strong>in</strong> different countries.<br />
For example, the def<strong>in</strong>ition for a pedestrian<br />
trip or a public transport trip may be different<br />
<strong>in</strong> different countries. In cities like Hong<br />
Kong, mode share is based on the number of<br />
board<strong>in</strong>gs by mode of transport (or journeystages).<br />
In most cities, however, mode share<br />
is reported on the basis of the number of<br />
journeys, which may consist of a series of<br />
board<strong>in</strong>gs on different modes of transport and<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> mode is reported as the transport<br />
mode.<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share is affected by household <strong>in</strong>comes,<br />
land use patterns, and many other economic<br />
and social factors. Therefore, the figures may<br />
not be directly comparable. They should be<br />
60 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
analysed together with the historical, social<br />
and economic situation of the city.<br />
The mode share <strong>in</strong>formation of some major<br />
metropolitan cities <strong>in</strong> the world is presented.<br />
They <strong>in</strong>clude the traditionally advanced<br />
cities (e.g. London, Paris, New York and<br />
Tokyo), newly developed cities (e.g. Hong<br />
Kong, Seoul), cities often cited <strong>in</strong> transport<br />
<strong>in</strong>novations or susta<strong>in</strong>able transport surveys<br />
(e.g. Bogota, Osaka), and emerg<strong>in</strong>g megacities<br />
(e.g. Shanghai, Bangalore) (Table 1).<br />
For cities where mode share <strong>in</strong>formation of<br />
different geographical coverage is available,<br />
the geographical area that is approximately <strong>in</strong><br />
a similar pattern to S<strong>in</strong>gapore is used (e.g. land<br />
area, population density).<br />
Table 1: List of Selected <strong>Cities</strong><br />
Asia<br />
Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Delhi,<br />
Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Mumbai, Osaka,<br />
Seoul, Shanghai, S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Taipei, Tokyo<br />
Australia<br />
Melbourne, Sydney<br />
Europe<br />
Barcelona, Berl<strong>in</strong>, London, Madrid, Paris,<br />
Prague, Rome, Vienna<br />
North America<br />
Chicago, New York City, Toronto<br />
South America<br />
Bogota, Curitiba
AHMEDABAD<br />
Population: 5.6 million<br />
Land area: 281 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 16% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Census of India 2011<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />
and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />
<strong>in</strong> India<br />
BANGALORE<br />
Population: 8.4 million<br />
Land area: 226 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 35% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Census of India 2011<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />
and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />
<strong>in</strong> India<br />
BARCELONA<br />
Population: 1.5 million<br />
Land area: 98 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 26% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />
A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />
Figure 1: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Ahmedabad<br />
JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Paratransit<br />
6%<br />
Cycle<br />
14%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
16%<br />
Figure 2: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Bangalore<br />
Walk<br />
26%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
35%<br />
Figure 3: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Barcelona<br />
Walk<br />
38%<br />
Walk<br />
22%<br />
Taxi<br />
1%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
26%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
42%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
25%<br />
Cycle<br />
7%<br />
Paratransit<br />
7%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
35%<br />
References<br />
61
CHICAGO<br />
Population: 2.7 million<br />
Land area: 589 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 16% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Chicago Regional Household Travel Inventory: <strong>Mode</strong> Choice<br />
and Trip Purpose for the 2008 and 1990 Surveys, Chicago<br />
Metropolitan Agency for Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CURITIBA<br />
Population: 1.9 million<br />
Land area: 430 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 45% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
ICLEI EcoMobility Case “Curitiba, Brazil - A model of transit<br />
oriented plann<strong>in</strong>g”<br />
DELHI<br />
Population: 11.0 million<br />
Land area: 431 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 42% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Census of India 2011<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />
and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />
<strong>in</strong> India<br />
Figure 7: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Chicago<br />
Walk<br />
19%<br />
Figure 8: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Curitiba<br />
Figure 9: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Delhi<br />
JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Bus<br />
11%<br />
Bus & BRT<br />
45%<br />
Walk<br />
21%<br />
Rail<br />
5%<br />
Taxi<br />
1%<br />
Others<br />
1%<br />
Cycle<br />
5%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
42%<br />
Cycle<br />
1%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
63%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
28%<br />
Walk<br />
21%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
19%<br />
Cycle<br />
12%<br />
Paratransit<br />
6%<br />
References<br />
63
MADRID<br />
Population: 3.1 million<br />
Land area: 606 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 34% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />
A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />
MELBOURNE<br />
Population: 4.1 million<br />
Land area: 1,566 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 8% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity 2007<br />
MUMBAI<br />
Population: 12.5 million<br />
Land area: 603 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 45% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Census of India 2011<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Urban Development, 2008. Study on Traffic<br />
and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Policies and Strategies <strong>in</strong> Urban Areas<br />
<strong>in</strong> India<br />
Figure 13: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Madrid<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
34%<br />
Figure 14: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Melbourne<br />
Walk<br />
13%<br />
Figure 15: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Mumbai<br />
JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Bus<br />
Rail 3%<br />
4%<br />
Walk<br />
27%<br />
Cycle<br />
2%<br />
Taxi<br />
1%<br />
Walk<br />
36%<br />
Others<br />
1%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
45%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
29%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
77%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
15%<br />
Paratransit<br />
7%<br />
Cycle<br />
6%<br />
References<br />
65
References<br />
NEW YORK<br />
Population: 8.2 million<br />
Land area: 790 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 23% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Census 2010, U.S. Census Bureau<br />
National Household Travel Survey 2009, New York City<br />
OSAKA<br />
Population: 2.7 million<br />
Land area: 222 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 34% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Osaka Prefecture Travel Report 2000 (<strong>in</strong> Japanese only, 大<br />
阪府全体の人の動き 第4回パーソントリップ調査から,<br />
Japan)<br />
PARIS (Paris et Petite Couronne) 3<br />
Population: 6.5 million<br />
Land area: 762 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 62% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
National <strong>Transport</strong> Survey 2008 (<strong>in</strong> French only, Enquête<br />
Nationale <strong>Transport</strong>s et Déplacements)<br />
66 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Figure 16: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> New York<br />
Walk<br />
39%<br />
Others<br />
6%<br />
Figure 17: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Osaka<br />
Walk<br />
27%<br />
Rail<br />
32%<br />
Bus<br />
10%<br />
Bus<br />
2%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
33%<br />
Rail<br />
12%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
39%<br />
Figure 18: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Paris et Petite Couronne<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
62%<br />
Cycle<br />
1%<br />
Taxi<br />
1%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
32%<br />
Walk<br />
4%
PRAGUE<br />
Population: 1.2 million<br />
Land area: 496 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 43% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
The Yearbook of <strong>Transport</strong>ation 2009, Prague<br />
ROME<br />
Population: 3.7 million<br />
Land area: 1,290 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 20% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Initiative Year Three, Annex<br />
A1. Common Indicator Report 2006<br />
SEOUL<br />
Population: 10.6 million<br />
Land area: 605 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes only motorised<br />
modes for all purposes. Mass transit<br />
constitutes 63% of motorised journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Seoul Statistics – Population Trend <strong>in</strong> 2010<br />
Seoul Statistics – Composition of Daily <strong>Passenger</strong><br />
<strong>Transport</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> 2009<br />
Figure 19: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Prague<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
43%<br />
Figure 20: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Rome<br />
Figure 21: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Seoul<br />
JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
20%<br />
Walk<br />
21%<br />
Bus<br />
28%<br />
Cycle<br />
1%<br />
Rail<br />
35%<br />
Walk<br />
23%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
33%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
59%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
26%<br />
Taxi<br />
6%<br />
Others<br />
5%<br />
References<br />
67
References<br />
SHANGHAI 4<br />
Population: 16.4 million<br />
Land area: 2,141 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 33% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Shanghai Yearbook 2011<br />
Shanghai Construction and <strong>Transport</strong> Commission 2009<br />
(data provided directly)<br />
SINGAPORE<br />
Population: 5.1 million<br />
Land area: 712 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 44% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore <strong>in</strong> Figures 2011<br />
Travel Survey 2011, Land <strong>Transport</strong> Authority, S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />
SYDNEY<br />
Population: 4.6 million<br />
Land area: 1,580 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 11% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
2009/10 Household Travel Survey-Key Indicators for Sydney<br />
Figure 22: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Shanghai<br />
68 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Figure 23: <strong>Mode</strong> share <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />
Rail<br />
19%<br />
Walk<br />
22%<br />
Taxi<br />
4%<br />
Cycle<br />
1%<br />
Figure 24: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Sydney<br />
Walk<br />
18%<br />
Walk<br />
27%<br />
Bus<br />
6%<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
33%<br />
Rail<br />
5%<br />
Others<br />
2%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
20%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
29%<br />
Bus<br />
25%<br />
E-bike<br />
10%<br />
Cycle<br />
10%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
69%
References<br />
VIENNA<br />
Population: 1.6 million<br />
Land area: 415 km 2<br />
<strong>Mode</strong> share<br />
Based on the number of journeys by ma<strong>in</strong><br />
mode of transport. It <strong>in</strong>cludes all modes for all<br />
purposes. Mass transit constitutes 36% of all<br />
journeys.<br />
Data Sources:<br />
Vienna Modal Split 2010 (<strong>in</strong> German only, APA-Grafik<br />
Modal Split, Wiener)<br />
Notes<br />
1. For Beij<strong>in</strong>g, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area,<br />
which is only part of the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Beij<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Municipality.<br />
2. For Guangzhou, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the central districts (i.e.<br />
Liwan, Yuexiu, Haizhu, Tianhe, Baiyun, Huangpu) only,<br />
which is only part of the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the<br />
Guangzhou Municipality.<br />
3. For Paris, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the city of Paris and the surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />
districts collectively called “Petite Couronne” (Little<br />
Crown, or Inner R<strong>in</strong>g): Hauts-de-Se<strong>in</strong>e, Se<strong>in</strong>e-Sa<strong>in</strong>t-<br />
Denis and Val-de-Marne.<br />
Figure 28: <strong>Mode</strong> Share <strong>in</strong> Vienna<br />
Public<br />
transport<br />
36%<br />
70 JOURNEYS | November 2011<br />
Cycle<br />
5%<br />
Walk<br />
28%<br />
Private<br />
transport<br />
31%<br />
4. For Shanghai, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area<br />
and the Pudong New District, which is only part of the<br />
area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Shanghai Municipality.<br />
5. For Tokyo, this <strong>in</strong>cludes the traditional urban area<br />
collectively called “23-Ward”, which is only part of<br />
the area adm<strong>in</strong>istered by the Tokyo Metropolitan<br />
Government (TMG).