11.08.2013 Views

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

spectacular growth. Many of the observations identified as the principles of <strong>Scheiner</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Willig</strong><br />

(Table <strong>1.</strong>3) have been recognized at various stages of development of ecology, but were not<br />

collected methodically into a system of propositions. Once they are, their theoretical<br />

significance becomes unambiguous. Whenever possible I will try to identify their first<br />

articulations.<br />

Biologists were interested in ecological questions well before the science of ecology<br />

emerged as an identifiable discipline. Indeed, if one defined the domain of ecology as<br />

emergence <strong>and</strong> interactions of ecological entities (organisms <strong>and</strong> supra-organismal formations<br />

such as family groups, herds, or communities although emergence of organisms is an exception<br />

as it falls into the domain of developmental biology) with each other <strong>and</strong> with their environment<br />

(but see <strong>Scheiner</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Willig</strong> 2008, also Chapter 1), many biological processes would be<br />

included. Any consideration of surrounding biological phenomena is likely to involve some<br />

ecology. Greek philosophers were interested in things that today fall within the scope of<br />

ecology. Theophrastus developed the conception of an autonomous nature, interacting with man<br />

<strong>and</strong> described various interrelationships among animals <strong>and</strong> between animals <strong>and</strong> their<br />

environment as early as the 4th century BC (Ramalay, 1940). His accounts entitled “On the<br />

Causes of Plants) represent the first known efforts to organize, interpret, <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> knowledge<br />

of plant reproduction, requirements, <strong>and</strong> uses. These early interests in the relations between an<br />

traits of organisms <strong>and</strong> the environment grew slowly. Initial questions were pragmatic <strong>and</strong> with<br />

limited theoretical content. Naturalists of the 18th <strong>and</strong> 19th centuries frequently had interest in<br />

ecological interactions, even if such interactions were not their main focus. Darwin was acutely<br />

aware of the importance of competition <strong>and</strong> predation, <strong>and</strong> made a spectacularly successful use<br />

of these notions in developing the assumptions of evolutionary theory.<br />

Systematic exploration of such pragmatic questions began in earnest in Engl<strong>and</strong>. The<br />

Rothamsted Experimental Station, founded in 1843, initiated a series of experiments between<br />

1843 <strong>and</strong> 1856 that were aimed at a variety of applied, yet clearly ecological problems related to<br />

agriculture.<br />

Parallel to the practical concerns, ideas that we recognize as modern began to emerge as<br />

well. The ecological concept of integrated communities of organisms first appeared in the 19th<br />

century with the studies of A. Grisebach (1838), a German botanist. The importance of this<br />

perspective was reflected in the need to define the discipline. In 1866, Haeckel recognized <strong>and</strong><br />

24<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!