11.08.2013 Views

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

constructs, <strong>and</strong> conventions. Finally, it is possible that the newest theories not listed here will<br />

need time to register widely in the discipline of ecology before they can appear in Figure 2.2.<br />

The history of theoretical developments in ecology involves more than the timing <strong>and</strong><br />

appearance of those constructs, or their direct effects on the discipline. In the long run, these<br />

constructs effectively define ecology, its domain, questions, <strong>and</strong> directions. They do so in a<br />

rather unsystematic manner. Nevertheless, the nature of ecology would be very different if not<br />

for the various relationships that theory has with the rest of ecology.<br />

THEORY SUPPORTS ECOLOGY<br />

I believe that ecology has been molded by theory to a much greater extent than commonly<br />

recognized. Although this thesis may appear trivial to those interested in theoretical progress<br />

<strong>and</strong> the unification of ecology, a great number of ecologists express some skepticism <strong>and</strong> even<br />

scorn of theoretical endeavors. Revisiting older <strong>and</strong> more recent developments <strong>and</strong> arguments<br />

shows that theory plays a central role in stimulating ecological research. Indeed, functions <strong>and</strong><br />

relationships of theory in science are numerous. Some of these functions <strong>and</strong> relationships can<br />

be identified in ecology. Below, I comment on several common facets of the use of theory in<br />

ecology, from historical patterns to current evidence for the contribution of or need for theory.<br />

These comments focus on ways in which theory stimulates, guides, or assists empirical<br />

research in some other ways. Under separate subheadings, I provide examples of situations<br />

where theory (e.g., mathematical interpretation of species abundance patterns) inspired efforts to<br />

accumulate new observational cases in order to verify patterns suggested by that theory, where<br />

broad empirical patterns were generalized (allometric relationships) <strong>and</strong> tentatively explained by<br />

theory (metabolic theory), where a new theory (neutral theory of diversity) led to many tests of<br />

its assumptions <strong>and</strong> predictions, or where early ideas (succession) underwent several cycles of<br />

refinements <strong>and</strong> empirical challenge. I also comment on the practical benefits that theory<br />

provides, whether by helping with the design of experiments or by providing an intellectual<br />

reassurance for conducting research. Because not all theories that ecology uses have been<br />

initially formulated in ecology, I note some links that ecological theories have with other<br />

disciplines, <strong>and</strong> the theory of evolution in particular.<br />

Theory, although an indispensable vehicle for generating underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> organizing<br />

knowledge, occasionally hindered progress, at least in other sciences. I note at least one<br />

32<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!