11.08.2013 Views

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

1 Samuel M. Scheiner and Michael R. Willig, eds. 1. A General ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gather existing theories in a unifying superstructure. This is the approach taken in this book.<br />

While it does not specifically address the problem of multi-individual or multi-species entities, in<br />

principle the hierarchical structure of a unified general theory has the capability of<br />

accommodating many well articulated lower level theories. Alternatively, a unified general<br />

theory that does not center on one or on narrow range of organizational scales may be capable of<br />

resolving the conflict as well. But such a theory may need another book.<br />

In any case, it may be useful to add one more principle (to add to eight identified already<br />

by <strong>Scheiner</strong> <strong>and</strong> Willing in Chapter 1) that reflects a generalization that all theories of ecology,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus the prospective general theory of ecology, deal with ecological entities. Ecological<br />

entities appear at different levels of organization: they may be individuals, kin groups, local<br />

populations, metapopulations, symbiotic systems, local communities or ecosystems (e.g., Wilson<br />

1988), <strong>and</strong> many others. <strong>Scheiner</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Willig</strong> are clearly aware of this when they mention<br />

variation among individuals – a label that includes individual organisms <strong>and</strong> individual species.<br />

However, different degrees of entitization constitute a universal feature of living nature. An<br />

explicit recognition of it as a ninth principle might aid in advancing the general theory of<br />

ecology.<br />

IN A NUTSHELL<br />

• Theory has had strong direct <strong>and</strong> indirect influence on the paradigm (mindset, culture,<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> directions) of ecology.<br />

• Ecology without theory would be a science accumulating cases, without the ability to<br />

develop <strong>and</strong> evolve, <strong>and</strong> without the ability to make sense out of the multitude of cases,<br />

except in the light of theory of evolution.<br />

• Even though, the systematic pursuit of theory has been modest, the successes have<br />

largely been idiosyncratic due to individuals who addressed particular questions without<br />

an overarching framework.<br />

• Awareness of theory <strong>and</strong> its use appears to increase with time across the discipline, but<br />

weaknesses persist.<br />

• In spite of efforts to remedy the situation, ecological theory has until recently comprised<br />

theories <strong>and</strong> models of narrow scope.<br />

46<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!