12.08.2013 Views

flood risk assessment in connection with a planning - Breckland ...

flood risk assessment in connection with a planning - Breckland ...

flood risk assessment in connection with a planning - Breckland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Flood Risk Assessment Tesco Supermarket, Swaffham<br />

The approximate required storage volumes (should off site attenuation<br />

and discharge SUDS system be adopted) have been calculated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the WINDES software package.<br />

The calculations are reproduced for reference <strong>in</strong> Appendix F.<br />

4.2.1.2 Infiltration rates<br />

Borehole <strong>in</strong>filtration tests were conducted by May Gurney dur<strong>in</strong>g a site<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation for the adjacent commercial park <strong>in</strong> 1996 (report ref<br />

41001, June 1996).<br />

These give approximate soil <strong>in</strong>filtration rates <strong>in</strong>to chalk at a depth of 6m<br />

below ground level of approximately 8.4 x 10 -5 . Further porosity tests<br />

are planned follow<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g approval to re-affirm these values.<br />

4.2.2 Groundwater Flood Risk<br />

Groundwater <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g can occur when groundwater levels rise above<br />

ground levels at the site. The underly<strong>in</strong>g solid geology (Chalk) is known<br />

to be a factor <strong>in</strong> areas/cases of groundwater <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g, especially <strong>in</strong> low<br />

ly<strong>in</strong>g Chalk valleys and areas were „w<strong>in</strong>terbourne‟ type spr<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

groundwater are known to cause <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>ter.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> this area the Chalk is known to be capped <strong>with</strong> a depth of<br />

low permeability glacial deposits, and the Chalk groundwater beneath<br />

is not known to be artesian. No records of previous groundwater<br />

<strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area have been noted.<br />

Groundwater <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g is therefore not considered to be a significant<br />

<strong>risk</strong>.<br />

4.2.3 Incapacity of dra<strong>in</strong>s or sewer <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g;<br />

There are several references <strong>in</strong> the SFRA for the area to surface water<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>capacity and sewer <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Provid<strong>in</strong>g that any off site surface water discharges are restricted to the<br />

run-off rates set out <strong>in</strong> Appendix F and section 4.2.1 above, then<br />

<strong>in</strong>capacity of dra<strong>in</strong>age is unlikely to be an issue.<br />

The proposed foul water discharge rates from the proposed<br />

development will need to be established and the rates approved by the<br />

local water authority/sewage undertaker.<br />

The <strong>risk</strong> of <strong>flood</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the site from this source is considered low.<br />

Page 11<br />

Jubb Consult<strong>in</strong>g Eng<strong>in</strong>eers Limited February 2012<br />

P9632-G300C-Rep-120209-MH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!