NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and ... - CLU-IN
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and ... - CLU-IN
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and ... - CLU-IN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>NATO</strong>/<strong>CCMS</strong> <strong>Pilot</strong> Project on Contaminated L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Groundwater (Phase III) January 2001<br />
The main aim <strong>and</strong> tasks <strong>of</strong> the pilot test was to solve the following problems in semi-industrial scale:<br />
• to check recovery efficiency <strong>of</strong> the proposed gravity separation on 1 - 3 m 3 <strong>of</strong> polluted material;<br />
• to check possible adsorption <strong>of</strong> Hg on clay minerals <strong>and</strong> its influence on the decontamination<br />
efficiency;<br />
• to test the dewatering <strong>of</strong> treated material;<br />
• to specify the energy consumption <strong>and</strong> total costs <strong>of</strong> decontamination;<br />
• to design the optimal decontamination unit that could be maintained <strong>and</strong> operated effectively<br />
under the conditions <strong>of</strong> the local economy <strong>and</strong> infrastructure.<br />
The <strong>Pilot</strong> Test was funded by the Czech National Property Fund. The total cost was 0.5 M CZK (13,000<br />
USD).<br />
3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT<br />
The decontamination unit set up for the pilot test consists <strong>of</strong> the following devices:<br />
• steel container—excavated material was loaded into steel container where the material was<br />
blunged by<br />
• hydromonitor—this device blunges <strong>and</strong> feeds the treated material to<br />
• gravity storage bin—from this tank the suspended material was pumped to<br />
• hydrocyclone—the first stage <strong>of</strong> separation - classifying into two fractions - mud <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> (in this<br />
fraction, the metallic mercury is concentrated <strong>and</strong> the mud is dewatered <strong>and</strong> backfilled into the<br />
excavation hole)<br />
• centrifugal concentrator—the second stage <strong>of</strong> separation, the pre-concentrate is finally treated<br />
• sedimentation basins—wastewater from hydrocyclone <strong>and</strong> centrifugal concentrator is pre-treated<br />
(sedimentation <strong>of</strong> mud)<br />
• centrifuge— dewatering <strong>of</strong> mud from hydrocyclone <strong>and</strong> sedimentation basins.<br />
During the processing <strong>of</strong> polluted soil the important points <strong>of</strong> tested technology was sampled:<br />
• polluted soil—this represents a problem because <strong>of</strong> the highly variable Hg concentration in the<br />
material (due to occurrence <strong>of</strong> Hg in drops <strong>and</strong>/or finely disseminated), analyzed concentrations<br />
vary from X00 to 120,000 ppm in the feed (i.e., polluted soil);<br />
• waste from hydrocyclone (mud) —determined values <strong>of</strong> Hg concentration did not exceed 10<br />
ppm;<br />
• pre-concentrate from hydrocyclone (s<strong>and</strong>y fraction) —due to high specific weight <strong>of</strong> Hg it is also<br />
complicated to collect representative samples;<br />
• waste from centrifugal concentrator—due to high specific weight <strong>of</strong> Hg it is also complicated to<br />
collect representative samples—determined Hg concentration was in order X ppm;<br />
• concentrate, i.e., separated mercury—this output was not sampled because it is represented by<br />
metallic mercury with admixture <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>, in frame <strong>of</strong> conducted <strong>Pilot</strong> Test about 9 ml <strong>of</strong> mercury<br />
(i.e., approximately 121.5 g) was separated.<br />
• process water—determined concentration <strong>of</strong> Hg were under the detection limit (