NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and ... - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III) January 2001 10. REFERENCES 1. - Pollution of Rock Environment and Groundwater by Mercury in the Area of Spolchemie a.s. in Ústí nad Labem. KAP, Ltd., Prague, 1998. 2. luted Soil., KAP, Ltd., Prague, 1999. 3. on Decontamination of Mercury Polluted Soil. KAP, Ltd., Prague, 2000. 19
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III) January 2001 Project No. 3 Technical Contact: Eberhard Beitinger WCI Umwelttechnik GmbH Sophie-Charlotten-Straße 33 14059 Berlin Tel: +49-/(0)30-32609481 Fax: +49-(0)30-32609472 E-mail: exbeiti0@wcc.com Media: Groundwater Costs Documented? No. Cost estimation is available. Results available? No. Field test results available. Permeable Treatment Beds Location: Former solvent blending plant, Essen, Germany Technology Type: Permeable reactive barrier as insitu groundwater remediation technology Contaminants: Chlorinated and nonchlorinated solvents, BTEX-aromates, TCE, PCE 20 Project Status: Interim Report, Field tests finalized Project Dates: Accepted 1997 Project Size: Full-scale Please note that this project summary was not updated since the 1999 report. An update will be provided in the 2001 report. 1. INTRODUCTION A pilot groundwater treatment plant was installed at a former industrial site in Essen, Germany, where organic solvents had been stored and processed in a small chemical plant for several decades. Leakage and handling losses caused significant soil and groundwater contamination, mainly by BTEX and CHC. The contaminated aquifer has low hydraulic conductivity and is only 2-3 m thick. The aquifer is covered by 4-11 m of thick, silty and clayey covering layers (loess). During investigations and conceptual remediation design, it was determined that the site was suitable to install adsorbent walls since conventional remediation and contamination control measures cannot be applied in a cost-efficient manner. Subsequently, WCI and IWS studied and reported on various technical variants to install an adsorbent wall in a feasibility study. The study also established which data were necessary to arrive at the dimensions of the adsorbent wall. The feasibility study recommended that pilot tests be conducted on the site for this purpose. The objective of the pilot tests was to obtain precise information on the adsorption potential for the contaminants at the site, the type and quantity of the required adsorbent material, the functioning of filters at different flow speeds, and the long-term effectiveness and attendant risks, if any, of installing an adsorbent wall. Conducting the pilot tests involved the following principal tasks: • Selecting a suitable adsorbent for the tests depending on water quality and the relevant contaminant concentrations at the site; • Structural design and planning of the pilot plant; • Operating and taking samples from the pilot plant, as well as carrying out laboratory analyses; • Assessment of the pilot tests.
Page 1 and 2: COMMITTEE ON EPA 542-R-01-001 THE C
Page 3 and 4: NOTICE This Annual Report was prepa
Page 5 and 6: Japan……........................
Page 7 and 8: NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contamin
Page 23: NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contamin
Page 75 and 76:
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contamin
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 1: Map of Slovenia with Stat
Page 203 and 204:
Table 1: Nitrate Content in Ground
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253:
show all

NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and ... - CLU-IN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?