13.08.2013 Views

United States Steel Corporation

United States Steel Corporation

United States Steel Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annual Report 1960 @<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong>


Front Cover<br />

Fifty-Ninth Annual Report<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

71 Broadway, New York 6, N. Y.<br />

525 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh 30, Pa.<br />

From imaginative research<br />

come an ever widening variety<br />

of new and useful products<br />

and an increasing efficiency<br />

in producing them.<br />

These are essential to<br />

continued growth and progress.<br />

CONTENTS<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s Year - at a glance<br />

Review by the Chairman<br />

page 3 Production and shipments<br />

4 Income, sales, dividends, taxes<br />

4 Property expenditures<br />

5 Working capital and debt<br />

5 <strong>Steel</strong> prices<br />

page 23<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

37<br />

38<br />

5 Technology and steel<br />

6 Integrated research<br />

6 Fundamental research<br />

7 Improved raw materials<br />

9 Better methods and processes<br />

10 Diversified products and markets<br />

14 The people of U. S. <strong>Steel</strong><br />

14 Employe training and development<br />

14 Employe safety<br />

15 Union employe matters<br />

16 Employes, hours and wages<br />

17 Employe benefit programs<br />

18 Pension trusts<br />

19 <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Foundation, Inc.<br />

19 Capital stock and stockholders<br />

20 Public acceptance<br />

Financial Summary<br />

Economic growth and steel<br />

Summary of Financial Operations<br />

Statement of Income<br />

Statement of Financial Position<br />

Notes to Financial Statements<br />

Auditors' Report<br />

Details of Selected Items<br />

Operating and Financial Story - 1940-1960<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund<br />

Divisions and Principal Subsidiaries<br />

Directors and Officers<br />

In this report, amounts in round numbers are approximate. "U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>"<br />

refers to parent corporation, subsidiaries, or both. as required by context.


Molten steel being poured from an electric furnace<br />

at V. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s South Works, Chicago, Illinois.


A Review of the Year<br />

by the Chairman<br />

Roger M. Blough,<br />

Chairman of Board of Directors<br />

In 1960 U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> experienced a wide range of activity in its rate of operations.<br />

During the first quarter record ingot production was achieved. Operations<br />

for the last half of the year declined to about half of the first quarter's<br />

activity level but for the year as a whole production, shipments and income<br />

were greater than they were in strike-affected 1959. In accordance with the<br />

new labor agreement, additional employe benefits were made effective at the<br />

beginning of the year followed by increased rates of pay on December 1, 1960.<br />

The general level of steel prices remained unchanged.<br />

PRODUCTION AND SHIPMENTS<br />

Production and shipments were at high levels for the first quarter of 1960,<br />

being influenced in part by a desire of customers to rebuild steel inventories<br />

that had been depleted during the strike in 1959. Production of steel ingots<br />

in that quarter was at a record level. <strong>Steel</strong> operations declined during the second<br />

quarter as customers' steel inventories became adequate. During the last<br />

half of the year operations were below the level of steel consumption, reflecting<br />

a reduction in customers' steel inventories. It is estimated that by the end of the<br />

year such inventories had been reduced to about the lowest level in recent<br />

years. A major reason for the low level of these inventories is the customers'<br />

3


confidence that the productive capacity of the steel industry assures ample and<br />

quick supply.<br />

Production of steel ingots and castings during the year amounted to 27.3<br />

million net tons, or 65.1 per cent of U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s rated capacity, and represented<br />

99.5 per cent of the 1957-1959 average production, compared with<br />

89.4 in 1959.<br />

Shipments of steel products during 1960 were 18.7 million tons compared<br />

with 18.1 million tons in 1959.<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s annual ingot capacity on January 1, 1961, was not materially<br />

increased over that reported for January 1, 1960, when it represented about<br />

28 per cent of the reported capacity for the steel industry as a whole.<br />

INCOME, SALES, DIVIDENDS, TAXES<br />

Income for 1960 was $304.2 million or 8.2 per cent on sales of $3,698.5 million.<br />

This compares with income of $254.5 million or 7.0 per cent on sales of<br />

$3,643.0 million in 1959, a year adversely affected by the 116-day steelworkers'<br />

strike, all as more fully set forth in the financial statements.<br />

Dividends of $7.00 per share were declared for the year on the 7 per cent<br />

cumulative preferred stock. Dividends for the year on the common stock were<br />

$3.00 per share, consisting of four declarations of 75 cents each in April, July<br />

and October and in January 1961. Total dividends declared for 1960 on both<br />

classes of stock aggregated $187.2 million or 5.1 per cent of sales and 61.6<br />

per cent of income. Income reinvested in the business was $117.0 million.<br />

Estimated <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> and foreign taxes on income together with state,<br />

local and miscellaneous taxes amounted to $377.8 million for 1960 comp'lred<br />

with $326.6 million for 1959.<br />

PROPERTY EXPENDITURES<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s expenditures for additions to and replacements of facilities<br />

amounted to $492.4 million in 1960 compared with $366.1 million in 1959.<br />

Property expenditures authorized during the year amounted to $297 million<br />

compared with $331 million in 1959. On December 31, 1960, the amount<br />

required to complete all authorized projects was estimated at $500 million<br />

compared with a corresponding amount of $695 million at the close of the<br />

prior year. During 1960 U. S. Government securities previously set aside to<br />

cover, in part, property expenditures authorized were drawn down in the<br />

amount of $195 million. The balance of such securities set aside amounted to<br />

$300 million at December 31,1960.<br />

The $492.4 million of property expenditures in 1960 compares with<br />

recorded wear and exhaustion of $208.4 million for the year. This latter<br />

amount was inadequate to recover the buying power originally expended for<br />

facilities used up in the year. The resulting deficiency is primarily due to<br />

inflation of the cost of new facilities while depreciation under existing tax laws<br />

continues to be based on the original cost of facilities purchased many years<br />

ago. The need for revision of the tax laws as they relate to depreciation is more<br />

4


the benefit of its customers, the public at large, its employes, and its stockholders,<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> is continuously engaged in scientifically developing the<br />

potentialities of this extraordinary metal - steel.<br />

Integrated research<br />

More than seventeen hundred scientists, engineers and supporting personnel<br />

are directly engaged in research at U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>. Research activities are<br />

coordinated with those of the engineering, metallurgical, production and<br />

commercial departments. All these groups seek to provide the customer with<br />

an existing steel or to develop a new one that will best suit his particular<br />

needs. The research activities include scientific studies generating new knowledge<br />

of the fundamental properties of steel, studies to make present steels<br />

more useful, and studies to develop completely new steels. The creativity,<br />

imagination and skills of all these people are augmented with the most modern<br />

research tools ranging from the ordinary chemical and physical analytical<br />

apparatus to small-scale production units capable of duplicating actual production<br />

conditions and problems. The newest scientific instruments are<br />

employed for rapid analysis of the chemical composition of steels. "Torture"<br />

tools are used to bend, twist, strain and break samples of steel to assure its<br />

suitability for the intended use by the customer.<br />

Many of the significant design and engineering improvements made in<br />

transportation, housing, roads, food handling and distributing methods owe<br />

their success in good measure to the contributions of steel research. Such<br />

research has also contributed to improved farming methods, to stronger<br />

national defense, and to significant "breakthroughs" in space exploration.<br />

Fundamental research<br />

u. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s Research Center at Monroeville, Pennsylvania, has a separate<br />

laboratory devoted exclusively to fundamental research. This process of<br />

extending the boundaries of human knowledge requires precise investigation<br />

of the structure of atoms, the arrangement of atoms into crystals and the<br />

relationships between structure and the resultant strength and other properties.<br />

The knowledge thus gained speeds the scientific development of new<br />

and better steels.<br />

The exactness required in investigating the fundamental properties of<br />

metals is illustrated by the fact that certain properties are strongly influenced<br />

by the presence of impurities of only one or two parts per million. Thus, for<br />

experiments in which even minute impurities would affect the findings,<br />

research must produce, through unique processes, extremely pure metals.<br />

<strong>Steel</strong>making involves complex chemical reactions between gases, slags and<br />

molten metals at high temperatures. Knowledge of the rate and manner in<br />

which these reactions occur and of how they are altered by changes in temperature,<br />

pressure and amounts of substances involved, leads to a greater<br />

scientific understanding of existing processes and aids in the design of new<br />

and better processes.<br />

6


With this modeI'll electron microscope<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> scientists can study ultra-small<br />

structural features of steel too tillY<br />

to be observed by even the most<br />

powerful light microscopes llsed<br />

for conventionalmagllification. Subjects<br />

call be magnified up to 250,000 times<br />

- a penny magnified to this extent<br />

would be almost three miles across.<br />

Improved raw materials<br />

The economical production of high quality products requires high quality<br />

low cost materials capable of being efficiently utilized. To produce one ton<br />

of finished steel product over 3 1h tons of coal, iron ore, limestone, scrap<br />

and other materials, along with vast quantities of air, must be assembled,<br />

mixed, stirred, cooked and molded - all under controlled conditions. Great<br />

quantities of water are also required. The production of steel is carried out<br />

at extremely high temperatures. The exactness required in controlling this<br />

complex operation for certain commercial products is such that if comparable<br />

specifications were applied in the baking of a cake the housewife<br />

would have to count the grains of sugar going into the batter.<br />

Research on raw materials has led to cleaner coal, more uniform and<br />

stronger coke and more uniformly sized iron bearing materials, all of which<br />

are essential to more efficient iron production. These improvements, combined<br />

with technological advances in the design, instrumentation and control<br />

of blast furnace operations, have resulted in startling accomplishments. For<br />

example, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> has produced over 35 per cent more iron in some of its<br />

most modern furnaces than was produced only ten years ago in its then most<br />

modern furnaces.<br />

7


Above, Lac Jeannine site of the<br />

Quebec Cartier Mining Company operation<br />

located in the Province of Quebec, Canada,<br />

about 193 miles north of the Gulf of<br />

St. Lawrence. 1n the background can be<br />

seen various bench levels of the open pit<br />

mine being developed. In the foreground<br />

are the storage silos and the concentrator<br />

which will convert the crude ore to a<br />

high-grade iron ore concentrate.<br />

Right, a new prototype dry magnetic separator<br />

designed and developed by Oliver Iron<br />

Mining Division for use in studying dry<br />

concentration of certain low-grade ores.


Below, fall scene in Wyoming's<br />

rugged Wind River Mountains,<br />

at the site of the<br />

Columbia - Geneva Division's<br />

"Atlantic City Project"<br />

for the mining and beneficiating<br />

of low-grade iron ore.<br />

This project will include an<br />

open pit iron ore mine,<br />

crusher, concentrator, pelletizer<br />

and shipping facilities.<br />

The raw materials program was further advanced in 1960 by the continued<br />

construction of iron ore production facilities at Quebec Cartier Mining<br />

Company in Canada. The construction of a major iron mining and ore beneficiating<br />

facility near Atlantic City, Wyoming to supply iron ore to the<br />

Columbia-Geneva <strong>Steel</strong> Division was also authorized. A new raw materials<br />

research laboratory for studying problems related to iron ore beneficiation<br />

was established by Columbia-Geneva. In addition to the present plant in<br />

Minnesota now being used for process development through the production<br />

of a limited quantity of commercial ores from low grade magnetic ore bearing<br />

materials, construction was authorized for an additional plant in Minnesota<br />

for experimental processing of non-magnetic low grade iron bearing<br />

materials which exist in substantial quantities in the western Mesabi Range.<br />

Better methods and processes<br />

Many people think of a steel mill as a series of large furnaces in which raw<br />

materials are melted, while nearby are the buildings that house massive<br />

machines to squeeze, shape, roll, or otherwise form the steel into various<br />

familiar products. But production of consistently high quality steels requires<br />

much more than that; it requires a multitude of necessary supporting equipment.<br />

Facilities are needed both for heating and for cooling the steel slowly<br />

or rapidly as required; machines are necessary for stretching, straightening,<br />

flattening, sawing, or cleaning it. But most important in producing high quality<br />

steels is the accumulating store of knowledge from which can be known in<br />

advance what will happen to the uniformity, structure and strength of the<br />

steel as various operations are performed.<br />

As an important research tool with respect to the efficiency of producing<br />

iron, a versatile four-foot diameter highly instrumented experimental blast<br />

furnace is being constructed which will accurately duplicate all phases of blast<br />

furnace operation. It will be equipped for precision control of temperature,<br />

pressure, wind velocity, and fuels. With it, furnace and supporting facility<br />

designs, size of materials, and fuels can be tested. In addition, construction of<br />

an ultra-modern blast furnace, near Pittsburgh, has been authorized. It will be<br />

the largest iron producing facility in the Pittsburgh District and will be equipped<br />

for evaluation of numerous technological innovations.<br />

Unnoticed by the casual observer are the tremendous quantities and varieties<br />

of refractory brick used in a steel mill. The selection of the proper brick for<br />

each process means greater productive time, and therefore capacity, because<br />

of the longer periods between shutdowns for repairs and rebuilding. Research<br />

scientists, using modern research tools and advanced techniques, analyze,<br />

design, construct and test to destruction various brick and brick shapes to<br />

find the best one for each of the many processes using such refractory materials.<br />

Such research has resulted in very substantial savings.<br />

Research on the shaping of steel involves, among other things, the development<br />

of complex systems of machine control which are largely automatic.<br />

Such controls are incorporated in the design of new equipment and in the<br />

9


Technician preparing ball bearings<br />

for use in lubricant testing<br />

equipment. Extensive research<br />

is conducted to select<br />

the best lubricant for<br />

each operation.<br />

improvement of existing facilities. For example, the combination 160-inch<br />

and 210-inch wide plate mill now under construction in the Chicago area will<br />

incorporate electronic and other controls developed through research. When<br />

completed, this mill will produce wider plates of more uniform thickness than<br />

any now available throughout the world. In 1960 a new high-speed six-stand<br />

52-inch cold reduction mill was authorized for the Tennessee Coal & Iron<br />

Division. This mill will have a speed approximately three times greater than<br />

that of the mills it replaces and will produce the thinner and wider steels for<br />

tin plate of the highest quality that are now in demand. To accelerate development<br />

of even more efficient processes and techniques, the Electromechanical<br />

Engineering Laboratory was opened at the Research Center in May of 19600<br />

Diversified products and markets<br />

Today's tailor-made steels allow the engineer and the designer greater freedom<br />

of imagination and frequent opportunity to apply entirely new principles of<br />

design and construction. Carbon steels, the "bread and butter" of the steel<br />

industry, have been improved and developed so that regular grades are now<br />

used for many specifications that formerly required alloy steels.<br />

<strong>Steel</strong>'s customers benefit from the new and improved products that stem<br />

from research. Improved axles and transmission shafts for use in automotive,<br />

earth moving and farm implement equipment can now be made from carbon<br />

steels, instead of more expensive alloys previously required. Quality steel bars,<br />

from which sparkplug shells are produced, permit the customer to form the<br />

shell by a cold extrusion process using only two-thirds of the steel formerly<br />

required when such shells \yere machined. Today's steel line pipe, because of<br />

its greater strength and larger diameter, enables our customers by using greater<br />

pressure to transmit 60 per cent more gas than was possible only a decade<br />

ago with the same tonnage of pipe.<br />

Among the new products introduced by U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> in 1960 was steel which<br />

can be enameled directly with a single coat, for economical use by industries<br />

making household appliances and other porcelain-enameled products. The<br />

American <strong>Steel</strong> & Wire Division introduced a higher-strength telephone wire<br />

which will reduce the cost of installing telephone lines; and the National Tube<br />

Division announced a new, stronger tubing joint, called "buttress thread,"<br />

which offers major advantages for the oil industry in its attempts to attain<br />

greater well depths.<br />

A revolution in tin plate manufacture has been wrought over the past<br />

twenty-five years. Individually coated small sheets, known as hot-dipped plate,<br />

have been replaced with coils of electrolytically coated steel strip almost four<br />

miles long. This product is of higher quality and uses about one-fourth of the<br />

tin previously needed for the hot-dipped plate. In 1960 a new thinner tin plate<br />

was introduced commercially under the trademark FERROLITE. From 100<br />

pounds of FERROLITE, customers are producing up to 1,400 six-ounce<br />

citrus juice cans compared with just over 1,000 cans made from the same<br />

weight of conventional electrolytic tin plate. Research is continuing to make<br />

10


Analog computor, right, in new<br />

Electromechanical building at the<br />

Research Center is used by scientist to<br />

simulate and analyze complex physical<br />

operating situations both rapidly<br />

and economically. Modern computors are<br />

used throughout U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> by<br />

research, engineering, production and<br />

accounting departments for the<br />

rapid solution of complex problems and<br />

for more efficient data handling.<br />

Continuous electroplating pilot line, right,<br />

at the Research Center is used for<br />

developing improved methods of<br />

depositing metallic coatings on steel.<br />

Knowledge gained from such research<br />

speeds up development of<br />

full-scale commercial methods for the<br />

production of new and improved products.<br />

Left, scientist takes measurements<br />

of a fine iron ore concentrate<br />

to predict, for example, the extent of shifting<br />

of concentrates when piled in ships' holds.<br />

Such research leads to safer<br />

and more efficient handling methods.


Attractive "Curtain Wall"<br />

building design,<br />

a postwar development<br />

employing stainless or colorful<br />

porcelain enameled steel<br />

exterior walls, has<br />

been utilized in over<br />

2,000 buildings in the past<br />

five years. These modern<br />

panels of steel not only<br />

reduce construction cost<br />

but also practically eliminate<br />

exterior maintenance.<br />

Left, stainless steel, because of its beauty<br />

and long life, was selected for the<br />

retractable dome of the nearly completed<br />

Civic Auditorium in Pittsburgh, Pa.<br />

which is being erected by<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s American Bridge Division.<br />

The use of tin plate for<br />

soft drink cans is growing.<br />

Although relatively a small part<br />

of the soft drink<br />

container market, tin plate<br />

sales for soft drink cans<br />

increased almost 50 per cent<br />

from 1959 to 1960.


3<br />

2<br />

Lost-T ime Accidents<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> Producing Divisions<br />

Per Million Manhours<br />

o<br />

1950 1955 1960<br />

craft and guided missiles; aircraft landing gear; special bolts, nuts and rivets;<br />

high-temperature bearings; and power plants for these flight devices.<br />

What new steel developments does the future hold? The answer lies in a<br />

continued search for new knowledge and in the translation of that knowledge<br />

into useful steels and products made of steels. Not too many years ago, steels<br />

for structural purposes having strength before breaking equal to 50,000 to<br />

60,000 pounds per square inch were commonly used. Today, strengths of<br />

80,000 to 100,000 pounds or more are common. For other applications ultrahigh-strength<br />

steels in the range of 250,000 to 300,000 pounds per square<br />

inch tensile strength have been developed and are being used. Fine sized steel<br />

wire with strength of 600,000 pounds has been developed and tested in the<br />

laboratory and is being commercially evaluated for special purposes. Fundamental<br />

research has demonstrated that the theoretical potential strength of<br />

steel is well over one million pounds per square inch.<br />

Research to improve existing steels, develop new ones and seek new uses<br />

for them is a never-ending process. It contributes to the strength and growth<br />

of the country, to employment security for U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s employes and to profits<br />

for its stockholders.<br />

THE PEOPLE OF U. S. STEEL<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s greatest resource - even more than its physical resources - is its<br />

employes. These are the people who create better steels, mine and move the<br />

materials, operate the furnaces and mills, sell the thousands of products produced,<br />

and ably manage and perform all the other essential functions.<br />

Employe training and developme n t<br />

To assure that adequately trained employes are available to meet both current<br />

and future needs, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s Management Development Policy was further<br />

implemented in 1960. This policy provides for the selection, training, development<br />

and advancement of members of management.<br />

About 4,200 employes, a record number, participated in U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s<br />

Advanced Technical Study Program, a voluntary self-development program<br />

open to all employes, while 51 management employes took part in advanced<br />

management programs at 15 colleges and universities. On-the-job training and<br />

re-training continues, and about 750 employes participated in the Trades<br />

Apprentice Training Program.<br />

Employe safety<br />

During 1960 the accident frequency rate established another all-time low.<br />

In the steel producing divisions, the long-term downward trend in the number<br />

of lost-time accidents reached a record low of 0.79 per million manhours<br />

compared with a rate of 1.05 in 1959 and 2.66 in 1950. Recognition<br />

by the National Safety Council and other agencies was earned by many plants<br />

for extended lost-time accident-free periods and for reduction in the number<br />

of accidents below the average of comparable operations.<br />

14


Early in 1960 Lorain Works of the National Tube Division established<br />

an all-time steel industry safety record of over 10 million manhours of production<br />

without a lost-time accident. Later in 1960 the employes of Gary<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> Works exceeded that new record by working over 17 million manhours<br />

without a single lost-time accident. These notable achievements in safety<br />

earned the National Safety Council's much coveted "award of honor" plaque.<br />

During the year the ore carrier Benjamin R Fairless of the Pittsburgh Steamship<br />

Division also won a National Safety Council Award for completing<br />

twelve years without a single lost-time accident.<br />

Union employe matters<br />

Since the settlement on January 4, 1960, with the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Steel</strong>workers of<br />

America applies to the majority of employes, labor relations in 1960 did<br />

not involve any negotiations affecting large groups of employes.<br />

Hourly employment costs were increased substantially in 1960 under terms<br />

of the settlement with the <strong>Steel</strong>workers. Under the agreement, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong><br />

now pays the entire cost of the insurance benefits program which previously<br />

had been shared with employes and which now provides additional insurance<br />

benefits. Increased pension benefits were provided for employes retiring<br />

during the period of the agreement. Further, the agreement renewed the<br />

supplemental unemployment benefit plan and continued the existing 17 cents<br />

per hour cost-of-living adjustment incurred under the previous contract.<br />

Details of these changes were set forth in the 1959 Annual Report.<br />

The agreement further provided that a wage increase be made effective<br />

December 1, 1960, ranging from 7 cents to 13 cents per hour including an<br />

increase of 0.2 cent per hour in increments between the job classes. It also<br />

provided for a maximum increase on that date of 3 cents per hour in the<br />

cost-of-living adjustment subject to reduction by the excess of the insurance<br />

benefits program cost as estimated for the quarter ending June 30, 1961,<br />

over a predetermined base. The company and union have agreed that the<br />

Leslie B. Worthington,<br />

President and Chairman of Executive Committee<br />

15


projected insurance costs in excess of the predetermined base are such that<br />

the 3 cents cost-of-living adjustment is completely offset. A further wage<br />

increase is to be made effective October 1, 1961, as well as a possible costof-living<br />

adjustment.<br />

The agreements with the <strong>Steel</strong>workers covering insurance, pensions and<br />

supplemental unemployment benefits continue in effect through December 31,<br />

1962, but are subject to renegotiation at the same time as the basic labor<br />

agreements which expire on June 30, 1962.<br />

The committees on human relations research and on local working conditions<br />

provisions established by the 1960 agreement with the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Steel</strong>workers<br />

of America met from time to time during the year. Their activities<br />

to date have been exploratory, and no final recommendations have been<br />

made on any of the subjects discussed.<br />

Operations at various plants were interrupted during 1960 by strikes called<br />

by the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Steel</strong>workers of America and the Brotherhood of Railroad<br />

Trainmen against certain subsidiary railroads furnishing common carrier<br />

service to those plants.<br />

The contract with the <strong>United</strong> Mine Workers of America negotiated in<br />

December 1958 by the Bituminous Coal Operators Association on behalf of<br />

its members, including U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>, and terminable on or after November 30,<br />

1959, on 60 days' advance notice by either party, continued in effect during<br />

1960. Payments made to the <strong>United</strong> Mine Workers of America Welfare and<br />

Retirement Fund in connection with U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s coal mining operations<br />

during 1960 amounted to $7.2 million.<br />

Under contract check-off provisions, $9.1 million was deducted in 1960<br />

from wages of employes for union dues, service charges, initiation fees and<br />

assessments, and remitted to authorized union officials. The corresponding<br />

amount deducted and remitted in 1959 was $6.8 million.<br />

The total number of work stoppages in 1960 was 39 as against 67 in 1959.<br />

Manhour losses in 1960 were estimated at 1.4 million, as compared with 108<br />

million in 1959 which reflected largely the steelworkers' strike.<br />

Employes, hours and wages<br />

The average number of men and women employed was 225,081. Total payroll<br />

in 1960 amounted to $1,504.0 million and manhours worked during the<br />

year aggregated 409.0 million.<br />

Weekly hours of work for all employes averaged 34.8 in 1960, compared<br />

with 35.1 for the year 1959 and 38.2 for the first half of 1959. Average<br />

hourly earnings for the year 1959 were abnormally affected by the steelworkers'<br />

strike in the latter part of that year. Accordingly, the 1959 hourly<br />

and weekly earnings shown below are for the first half of the year, the prestrike<br />

period.<br />

16<br />

Year 1960<br />

First Six Months -1959<br />

Hourly<br />

$3.68<br />

$3.67<br />

Weekly<br />

$127.81<br />

$139.89


The 1960 average hourly earnings reflect only one month's effect of the<br />

December 1, 1960, wage rate increases. These average hourly and weekly<br />

earnings are exclusive of social security taxes, pensions, insurance, and other<br />

employe benefits.<br />

Employe benefit programs<br />

The amounts provided by U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> to cover the cost of pensions, social<br />

security taxes, insurance and other employe benefits in the years 1960 and<br />

1959 are shown in the table on the following page.<br />

Pensions - During the year the pension plan was amended by the Board of<br />

Directors to include increased pension benefits negotiated with labor unions,<br />

and related adjustments. Under the U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> pension plan, pensions were<br />

granted during 1960 to 4,708 retiring employes. At the end of the year there<br />

were 37,401 former employes or their co-pensioners receiving pensions as<br />

compared with 35,175 at the end of 1959. Pension benefits paid in 1960 were<br />

$42.5 million.<br />

Insurance - Under the U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> group insurance plans, beneficiaries of<br />

active and retired employes received death benefits of about $14.4 million in<br />

1960 and $13.3 million in 1959. At the end of the year approximately 243,000<br />

active and retired employes were insured for about $1,629 million of life<br />

insurance. Accident, sickness, hospital, surgical, in-hospital medical and<br />

major medical benefits of $37.0 million were received during 1960 by<br />

employes or their families under the U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> insurance plans.<br />

S. U. B. - Supplemental unemployment benefit payments to eligible employes,<br />

which first became payable in September 1957, have totaled $41.9<br />

million since the inception of the plans, including $16.5 million in 1960.<br />

Savings fund plan - The Savings Fund Plan for Salaried Employes, designed<br />

to encourage individual savings and assist employes in acquiring a stock interest<br />

in the <strong>Corporation</strong> on a continuing basis, completed its fourth year of<br />

operation. About 40,000 salaried employes - over 92 per cent of those eligible<br />

- were participating in the plan at year end and were saving on the average<br />

about 6.6 per cent of their base salaries. Employe savings during the year<br />

amounted to $22.4 million.<br />

Participants may elect to have all of their savings invested in obligations<br />

of the U. S. Government or one-half in such obligations and one-half in<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> common stock. They elected to invest in U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> common stock<br />

almost 93 per cent of their savings eligible for such investment. These savings,<br />

together with company contributions of 50 cents for each dollar of savings<br />

by a participant, and the dividends received during the year were used for<br />

the purchase of 303,702 shares of U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> common stock. Since the inception<br />

of the plan such purchases which were credited to savings plan participants<br />

amounted to 1,078,991 shares as of December 31, 1960, or 2.0 per cent<br />

of the outstanding shares. Shares held in the trust, except shares not vested<br />

in employes, are voted by the trustee in accordance with directions furnished<br />

by the employes. Shares not vested are not voted. Company contributions<br />

17


for the 1957 Year Class, under provisions of the plan, became vested to the<br />

participants January 1, 1961.<br />

Employe suggestion plan - U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> continues to encourage and reward<br />

the creative abilities of its non-management employes through the employe<br />

suggestion plan. During 1960, a record number of ideas were accepted and<br />

installed for which employes were awarded approximately $490,000.<br />

PENSION TRUSTS<br />

The amounts shown in the table for the current service costs of pensions are<br />

based on actuarial rates determined by an independent actuary and represent<br />

full provision for such costs for 1960 and for 1959. During 1960, in the light<br />

of a review of U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s actual experience, certain actuarial service and<br />

mortality tables and the interest rate were refined, and costs were more directly<br />

related to the level of operations. If these refinements had not been made,<br />

total pension costs in 1960 would have been increased to approximately $122<br />

million because of increased pension benefits made effective following negotiations<br />

with labor unions during the year.<br />

Although full provision was made for current service pension costs for the<br />

year 1960, it was determined that because of the reduced level of steel operations<br />

no payments be made toward funding of past service cost. In 1959 it<br />

was also determined that no payments be made in that year toward the funding<br />

of past service pension cost. Past service cost applies against the actuarial cost<br />

of non-contributory pensions for service rendered prior to March 1, 1950, the<br />

effective date of the present plan. The cost which had not been funded at that<br />

date was then estimated at $496 million of which approximately $207 million<br />

remained unfunded as of December 31,1960.<br />

There is no unfunded past service cost in connection with contributory pensions,<br />

since no service prior to the date of employe participation is involved<br />

in determining benefits.<br />

18<br />

Cost of Employe Benefits<br />

Pension costs<br />

N on-contributory part of pension plan<br />

Funding of current service cost (including interest on past<br />

service cost). . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Funding of portion of past service cost. . . . . . . .<br />

Total non-contributory pension costs. . . . . .<br />

Contributory part of pension plan - current service cost.<br />

Total pension costs.<br />

Social security taxes . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Insurance costs. . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Supplemental unemployment benefit costs.<br />

Savings fund costs . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Payments to industry welfare and retirement funds and other<br />

employe benefit costs.<br />

Total cost .................. .<br />

1960 1959<br />

$ 81,426,355 $ 94,677,379<br />

81,426,355 94,677,379<br />

5,799,229 9,679,252<br />

87,225,584 104,356,631<br />

56,212,263 46,978,835<br />

55,713,770 20,981,897<br />

8,467,616 10,902,835<br />

11,735,880 11,541,557<br />

27,314,547 26,406,745<br />

$246,669,660 $221,168,500


300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Registered Stockholders<br />

Thousands at Year End<br />

o 1940 '45 '50 '55 1960<br />

The assets, less reserves, of the combined pension trusts were $1,338.4<br />

million at December 31, 1960, and $1,228.8 million at December 31, 1959,<br />

as set forth in the statement appearing on page 38. These funds are held by<br />

the trustee, <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund (a non-profit<br />

Pennsylvania membership corporation), solely for the payment of benefits<br />

under the U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> pension plan, and were adequate at the respective dates<br />

to meet currently accruing pension costs incurred since the adoption of the<br />

present contributory and of the present non-contributory parts of the pension<br />

plan in 1940 and 1950, respectively, as well as to pay full pensions to all<br />

those then entitled to receive them.<br />

UNITED STATES STEEL FOUNDATION, INC.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Foundation, Inc" which was formed in 1953, continues<br />

to provide aid for charitable, educational and scientific organizations and<br />

activities, A contribution of $6,0 million was made by U, S, <strong>Steel</strong> to the<br />

Foundation in 1960.<br />

CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS<br />

As of December 31, 1960, there were 54,033,307 shares of common stock<br />

outstanding, an increase of 72,300 shares which were purchased during 1960<br />

upon exercise of options granted in prior years to key management employes<br />

under the Stock Option Incentive Plan. No change has occurred in the<br />

3,602,811 shares of preferred stock outstanding,<br />

At the end of 1960, the outstanding shares were held by 321,834 registered<br />

holders, Of these, 61,114 held preferred stock, 274,918 held common stock,<br />

and 14,198 held both classes of shares, In the year, the number of registered<br />

holders increased by 6,030, bringing the total holders to a new peak.<br />

About 296,000 stockholder accounts are in the names of individuals, and<br />

Stockholders and Shares<br />

December 31 , 1960<br />

Preferred Common Total<br />

Registered in names of: Holders Shares Holders Shares Holderst Shares<br />

Individuals-Women 31,516 909,246 116,375 14,597,952 140,721 15,507,198<br />

Men. 14,689 473,908 89,129 13,113,344 100,115 13,587,252<br />

Joint accounts . 6,427 155,143 49,952 3,925,467 54,982 4,080,610<br />

Total, 52,632 1,538,297 255,456 31,636,763 295,818 33,175,060<br />

Charitable and educationalt . 1,349 117,962 1,493 643,015 2,634 760,977<br />

Insurance companies, 183 415,929 260 836,649 371 1,252,578<br />

Industrial and other companies. 639 124,815 2,314 1,153,608 2,764 1.278,423<br />

Trustees, guardians and estates. 5,083 243,430 13,247 2,513,349 17,741 2,756,779<br />

Brokers, nominees and others* . 1,228 1.162,378 2,148 17,249,923 2,506 18,412,301<br />

Total, 61,114 3,602,811 274,918 54,033,307 32 1,834 57,636,118<br />

t 14,198 are holders of bOlh preferred and common shares.<br />

t Includes lIIedical ami religious orgallizatiolls. fOllndaliolls, hospitals. libraries.<br />

* MallY inslituliollai illl eSlors, illcluding those ill olher listed categories, hold stock in the name of nominees,<br />

19


no one of them holds of record as much as two-tenths of one per cent of<br />

either the preferred or common stock. Excluding shares of common stock held<br />

in the Savings Fund Plan Trust, reported on page 17, the largest holding of both<br />

preferred and common stock among other than individual holders is less than<br />

one and one-half per cent of both classes of shares, these shares in turn being<br />

beneficially owned by many individuals as is the case generally with stock<br />

registered in the names of brokers, nominees, trustees and estates. A statement<br />

of the number of stockholders and number of shares as of December 31, 1960,<br />

is shown on the preceding page.<br />

PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE<br />

During 1960 <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> embarked on one of the most significant programs<br />

ever undertaken by a major industrial enterprise. Called Watching<br />

America Grow, it was designed to recognize the real achievements and true<br />

economic strength of America.<br />

With interesting facts about people and business, assembled by Lowell<br />

Thomas from many available sources and then reported by him in newspapers,<br />

magazines and on television, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> was able to reach upwards of 80 million<br />

people with the news of America on the move. Other companies and other<br />

industries, each in their own way, joined in generating similar programs.<br />

As in former years, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> also actively sought to gain a broader public<br />

understanding of its policies, actions, problems and products. Various officials<br />

delivered major talks on pertinent subjects in different parts of the country,<br />

and in Canada, as well.<br />

One of the year's most widely acclaimed television presentations, sponsored<br />

by U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> during the holiday season, was the half-hour Project 20<br />

program in color, The Coming of Christ. Throughout the year on the CBS network,<br />

The <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Hour continued to bring fine dramatic entertainment<br />

into the homes of millions of viewers.<br />

American schools, colleges and civic organizations benefited from a grant<br />

by U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> Foundation, Inc., that made possible the nation-wide distribution<br />

of a spectacular new film series, Horizons of Science, designed to interest<br />

students in scientific careers. Sixty-six sets of ten different films, which are in<br />

color and will be seen in the next several years by more than 17 million youngsters<br />

and adults, were placed in major audio-visual centers and a number of<br />

key metropolitan areas.<br />

Turning to modern algebra after last year's successful courses in atomic age<br />

physics and modern chemistry, Continental Classroom expanded its coverage<br />

to 170 stations for daily telecasts to a combined audience in excess of 500,000.<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> is among the sponsors of this increasingly popular program.<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> also published two new teaching aids. One of these was a booklet<br />

containing ten unusual laboratory experiments directly related to the chemistry<br />

and physics of steel and the other a flow chart showing how coal chemicals<br />

are made. In addition to the large number of requests received for these two<br />

new aids, almost 25,000 requests for other teaching aids and related materials<br />

20


Hailed by the press as<br />

"a stunning work of permanence<br />

... a program of exceptional<br />

beauty and reverence,"<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s Christmas coIO/·cast,<br />

"The Coming oj Christ,"<br />

was produced by Don Hyatt<br />

oj NBC's "Project 20."<br />

made available by <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> were received from teachers and<br />

students in American and foreign schools.<br />

1'1<br />

In the light of the recent period of low production, it is not amiss to recall<br />

that we have had other periods of low production and have worked our way<br />

out of them. Nor should we forget that over the sixty-year period of its<br />

existence U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s production has averaged about 75 per cent of its capacity<br />

to produce. A glance at the chart on page 5 showing the variation in<br />

shipments of steel products between quarters in 1960 will give some appreciation<br />

of the problems faced by the entire organization in coping with the ups<br />

and downs of industrial activity and the consequences to employment which<br />

have followed the protracted strike of 1959.<br />

No one in U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> forgets that other materials are competitive with steel<br />

and that many other very competent companies produce and market steel.<br />

There is, moreover, increasing competition among American and foreign<br />

steel producers for the markets at home and abroad. Thus U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> lives<br />

and must strive in a highly competitive atmosphere.<br />

One of the basic answers to our ability to compete lies in the developing<br />

technology of steel and in originating new and improved steel products. Stockholders<br />

will recognize that a larger proportion of this report than usual has<br />

been devoted to telling the story of research and new products, improved raw<br />

materials and better methods and processes. It may be said fairly that more<br />

and more time and energy of the organization is being devoted to these phases<br />

of our affairs, and the results are beginning to show in more new products and<br />

better methods of manufacturing.<br />

Competitive roads have always been and always will be difficult to travel,<br />

but with U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s capable organization and with an increasing flow of<br />

creative and innovating ideas, products and processes, even the most difficult<br />

of these roads should prove readily traversable.<br />

Under the goad of such competition we achieve better service to our customers<br />

and more satisfactions to consumers and thus aid in the economic<br />

growth of our nation. Stockholders will find the statement on "Economic<br />

Growth and <strong>Steel</strong>" in the financial summary an interesting commentary and<br />

an aid to understanding national growth.<br />

In all of the nation's economic growth steel has a singular part to play. And<br />

all of us in <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> - stockholders and employes alike - have<br />

essential roles in the total contribution which our <strong>Corporation</strong> can and does<br />

make to our nation's well-being.<br />

February 28, 1961<br />

21<br />

Chairman, Board of Directors


This modern continuous quenching and drawing furnace<br />

at the Homestead District Works<br />

near Pittsburgh is used to produce superior quality<br />

heat treated, alloy plates.


Financial Summary<br />

Robert C. Tyson,<br />

Chairman of Finance Committee<br />

Economic growth and steel<br />

Much is being said by many these days about economic growth. Significant<br />

economic growth is impossible in our modern era without the abundant production<br />

and fabrication of steel into thousands of kinds of tools, structures and<br />

other useful products. Conversely, without economic growth a major part of<br />

the market for steel must wither away. No industry has a greater stake in<br />

economic growth than the steel industry, or is likely to suffer more widespread<br />

injury should national growth falter.<br />

These truths are virtually self-evident. Iron is abundant in the earth's crust<br />

and iron ore is fortunately found in such concentrations that iron - and hence<br />

steel - is among the least costly of all metals. That is of great importance, but<br />

beyond that, as described in another part of this report, steel is an extraordinarily<br />

useful metal capable of being made to meet a wide range of specifications.<br />

Over 95 per cent of our civilization's metal requirements are met by<br />

steel. It is out of steel that the tools of production, through which growth is<br />

achieved, are fashioned. <strong>Steel</strong> is embodied in the nation's accumulation of<br />

durable wealth. The goods and services we enjoy require the presence and use<br />

of steel in mines, farms, forests and factories; in power, transportation and<br />

communication systems; and in business, residential and public structures. Its<br />

accumulated presence gives economic power and its expansion is involved in<br />

economic growth.<br />

:23


Statistics adequate to measure accurately the physical growth in this productive<br />

and useful wealth do not exist; and this renders all controversies over<br />

percentage rates of economic growth, whether at home or abroad, quite<br />

academic. Only fragmentary information is available. The American Iron and<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> Institute has, for example, estimated that the accumulated total of steel<br />

products installed and daily serving the nation is over 1 Yz billion tons - more<br />

than 8 tons per person. There is also, among the more accurate data, the long<br />

record of this country's annual steel production out of which additions to<br />

accumulated wealth are fashioned. During this century, as may be noted in the<br />

chart on page 25, there has been a majestic upward sweep in steel production.<br />

In recent years production has been nine or ten times what it was at the turn<br />

of the century - an average increase of 3 Yz to 4 per cent per annum compounded.<br />

The comparable population growth rate was about 1 Yz per cent.<br />

As a measure of the increasing economic usage of steel, production figures<br />

are significantly deficient in one respect. With the passage of the years, and<br />

as a result of intensive research, steel has changed and become better. In<br />

numerous instances a ton of steel today can and does serve purposes that<br />

formerly required more than a ton - in some instances nearly two tons. New<br />

steels can and do, moreover, serve useful new purposes that neither steel nor<br />

other materials formerly could practically serve. <strong>Steel</strong>'s contribution to<br />

economic growth has increased more rapidly than registered by the tonnage<br />

data. Because steel quality improvements have not been adequately quantified<br />

it interestingly follows that steel price increases have not been adequately<br />

qualified. A part of additional price is assignable to additional quality.<br />

Because of this nation's great wealth in the form of installed steel products,<br />

it can on occasion refrain without great hardship from adding thereto. In<br />

wartime, for example, industrial capacity is diverted to armament production<br />

and the existing peacetime durable goods are made to last a little longer. There<br />

are other occasions. For example, in the 1930's per capita steel production<br />

averaged only three-fourths as much as it averaged in the "new era" 1920's.<br />

In the 1950's when economic growth reflected the world-wide "catch-up"<br />

demand caused by the war, per capita steel production averaged more than<br />

double that of the prewar 1930's. The fact that the "catch-up" demand may<br />

now have been satisfied renders considerations of economic growth of particular<br />

interest to steel producers at this time.<br />

ECONOMIC GROWTH<br />

Although economic growth is so important to a steel producer, mere growth in<br />

terms of just producing an ever bigger pile of goods is unacceptable as an<br />

overriding American objective. It leaves out too many other popularly<br />

cherished notions. If, for example, the maximum possible production were all<br />

that was desired there would be no restrictions on the weekly hours of labor;<br />

there would be fewer or no restrictions on the labor of youth; costly and timeconsuming<br />

"higher" education would be restricted to those of demonstrated<br />

talent the more quickly to add the less talented to manual labor forces; unem-<br />

24


Million<br />

Persons<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

o 1900<br />

Growth In <strong>Steel</strong><br />

1910 1920<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> Ingot<br />

Production<br />

U.S.A.<br />

1930 1940 1950<br />

1960<br />

M illion<br />

Tons<br />

ployment and pension payments, if sanctioned at all, would be contingent on<br />

need; no minimum wage would preclude those not worth it from working at<br />

lesser rates to contribute their bit to the pile of products; strikes and lockouts<br />

would be prohibited by law. This nation could easily - but would not - choose<br />

to win a production race at such price. Mere physical growth is an inadequate<br />

measure of mounting satisfaction that an economy provides to those living<br />

under it - especially if such growth is dictated rather than voluntarily achieved.<br />

International comparisons that are based on such measurements are thus<br />

incomplete or even misleading.<br />

Some of the values that are surely sought and prized in the American scale<br />

of Jiving, but not measurable by production statistics, can be illustrated in the<br />

long records of U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>. Thus, fifty years ago the weekly hours of labor in<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> were nearly 70. Over the years the average hours actually worked<br />

decreased about 50 per cent. In the same period average weekly employment<br />

costs per employe, which include payments to and for the employe, increased<br />

25<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

o


Plant & Equipment<br />

Expenditures<br />

VS.<br />

Depreciation plus<br />

Income Reinvested B illions<br />

r----------------------, $40<br />

1946<br />

Expenditures<br />

Depreciation<br />

plus<br />

Income<br />

Reinvested<br />

U. S. corporations excludmg<br />

banks and Insurance companies<br />

Source : U. S. Department of Commerce<br />

1960 data partly estimated<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

o<br />

other enterprises who do business with them as their capabilities as customer<br />

or supplier are undermined.<br />

In former times when the tax rate on corporate income was smaller and<br />

inflation was not a big factor, these same injustices and impediments to growth<br />

were present but not of as great moment. But with the enormous increases in<br />

the tax rate until it is now over 50 per cent - some three times the pre-war<br />

rates - they are indeed worthy of most serious consideration and correction<br />

if we are to have economic growth.<br />

PROFITS AND PROGRESS<br />

An intangible but potent obstacle to growth, to the extent it exists in some<br />

public and political quarters, is the notion that profits and sin are synonymous.<br />

This may represent a semantic success in generating hostility toward profits<br />

as such, but it fiies in the face of both good reasoning and the historical record.<br />

The real truth is that profits and progress are synonymous. All peacetime years<br />

for which the records are available and in which production and employment<br />

have been regarded as prosperously above normal have been years in which<br />

profits were greater than average. All years regarded as depression years have<br />

been years in which profits have been smaller or replaced by losses.<br />

That profits, particularly that part which is reinvested, are essential to<br />

growth in America can be statistically illustrated. Thus growth requires investment<br />

in new tools of production. The corporations are the big purchasers of<br />

such tools. The funds they generate for such purchases are the amount<br />

recorded as depreciation and as reinvested income. In the accompanying chart<br />

of data compiled by the Department of Commerce one of the lines shows for<br />

the years since 1946 the sum of the depreciation and income reinvested of<br />

American corporations, excluding banks and insurance companies. The other<br />

line shows their plant and equipment expenditures. That the two Jines change<br />

in generally similar fashion is apparent. There are two periods of disparity in<br />

movement- for four years in the early 1950's, and for the two years, 1956<br />

and 1957. In both instances expenditures significantly exceeded funds available<br />

from depreciation and income reinvested. The first period was one during<br />

which the Government permitted accelerated amortization of certain facilities<br />

in the calculation of taxable income, thus illustrating the importance to growth<br />

of realistic treatment of depreciation. As for 1956 and 1957, each of these<br />

years was preceded by one in which total corporate profits were greater than<br />

in any previous year, illustrating the power of profit in promoting growth. In<br />

both periods the corporations drew heavily on "outside" sources of funds to<br />

help finance their capital expenditures, illustrating a growth-multiplying consequence<br />

of expanding cash flows.<br />

If the nation is to enjoy the economic growth of which it is capable, it is<br />

neither necessary nor desirable that profits be subsidized. It is both necessary<br />

and desirable that they be not unwarrantably condemned or "squeezed" - as<br />

of late - for they are a major incentive and principal means of achieving<br />

economic growth in our land.<br />

29


Summary of 1960<br />

Financial Operations<br />

Additions to working capital<br />

Income ...... .<br />

Add - Wear and exhaustion of facilities<br />

Proceeds from sales and salvage of plant and equipment .<br />

Proceeds from sale of common stock under Stock Option Incentive Plan<br />

Miscellaneous additions<br />

Total additions<br />

Deductions from working capital<br />

Expended for plant and equipment . $492,401,892<br />

Less - Use of funds set aside in prior years . 195,000,000<br />

297,401,892<br />

Added to costs applicable to future periods 14,322,103<br />

Reduction in total long-term debt . . . . 32,805,544<br />

Dividends declared on preferred and common stocks 187,235,868<br />

Total deductions . . . . .<br />

Reduction in working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Working capital per Consolidated Statement<br />

of Financial Position<br />

December 31, 1960<br />

December 31, 1959<br />

$608,094,605<br />

615,538,386<br />

Reduction .......•.•..................<br />

30<br />

$304,170,990<br />

208,424,291<br />

8,265,089<br />

2,932,500<br />

528,756<br />

524,321,626<br />

531,765,407<br />

$ 7,443,781<br />

$ 7,443,781


Consolidated Statement of<br />

Income<br />

1960 1959<br />

Products and services sold . • • • . • • • . • . • . . . . . .. $3,698,494,931 $3,643,040,035<br />

Costs<br />

Employment costs<br />

Wages and salaries<br />

Pensions and other employe benefits (see pages 18 and 19).<br />

Products and services bought . .<br />

Wear and exhaustion of facilities .<br />

Interest and other costs on long-term debt.<br />

State, local and miscellaneous taxes. . . .<br />

Estimated <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> and foreign taxes on income<br />

Total<br />

Income . ....••.....................<br />

Dividends declared<br />

On cumulative preferred stock ($7 per share)<br />

On common stock ($3 per share)<br />

Income reinvested in business<br />

31<br />

1,453,317,932<br />

246,669,660<br />

1,355,034,915<br />

221,168,500<br />

1,699,987,592 1,576,203,415<br />

1,091,166,958<br />

208,424,291<br />

16,942,052<br />

107,803,048<br />

270,000,000<br />

3,394,323,941<br />

304,170,990<br />

25,219,677<br />

162,016,191<br />

$ 116,935,122 $<br />

1,278,199,885<br />

189,854,452<br />

17,647,717<br />

93,571,165<br />

233,000,000<br />

3,388,476,634<br />

254,563,401<br />

25,219,677<br />

161,816,789<br />

67,526,935


Consolidated Statement of<br />

Financial Position<br />

Current assets<br />

Less<br />

Cash ...<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Government securities, at cost (approximates market)<br />

Receivables, less estimated bad debts<br />

Inventories (details on page 36)<br />

Total<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Working capital<br />

Accounts payable<br />

Accrued taxes, less <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Government<br />

securities of $154,000,000 at December 31, 1960<br />

and $153,300,000 at December 31, 1959.<br />

Dividends payable . . . . . . . . .<br />

Long-term debt due within one year .<br />

Total<br />

Miscellaneous investments, less estimated losses<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Government securities set aside<br />

for property additions and replacements ..... .<br />

Plant and equipment, less depreciation (details on page 35)<br />

Operating parts and supplies . . .<br />

Costs applicable to future periods. .<br />

Total assets less current liabilities<br />

Deduct<br />

Long-term debt (details on page 36)<br />

Reserves for insurance, contingencies and accident and hospital<br />

expenses (details on page 35) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Excess of assets over liabilities and reserves<br />

Ownership evidenced by<br />

Preferred stock, 7% cumulative, par value $100 (authorized<br />

4,000,000 shares; outstanding 3,602,811 shares) . . . .<br />

Common stock (authorized 90,000,000 shares; outstanding<br />

54,033,307 shares at December 31, 1960 and 53,961,007<br />

shares at December 31, 1959) ..... .<br />

Par value $16% per share. . . . . . . .<br />

$ 900,555,117<br />

Income reinvested in business (see page 31<br />

for addition of $116,935,122 in 1960).<br />

2,041,031,287<br />

Total<br />

32<br />

Dec. 31, 1960 Dec. 31, 1959<br />

$ 276,501,195 $ 258,430,638<br />

175,218,208 257,015,168<br />

218,523,857 311,985,387<br />

725,599,116 596,341,886<br />

1,395,842,376 1,423,773,079<br />

373,065,094 452,895,240<br />

336,194,106 275,756,872<br />

46,835,794 46,793,037<br />

31,652,777 32,789,544<br />

787,747,771 808,234,693<br />

608,094,605 615,538,386<br />

43,036,483 41,402,425<br />

300,000,000 495,000,000<br />

2,787,553,310 2,511,840,798<br />

48,898,855 49,924,902<br />

51,518,319 37,196,216<br />

3,839,101,572 3,750,902,727<br />

422,778,670 454,447,447<br />

114,455,398 112,727,898<br />

$3,301,867,504 $3,183,727,382<br />

$ 360,281,100 $ 360,281,100<br />

2,941,586,404 2,823,446,282<br />

$3,301,867,504 $3,183,727,382


Common stock<br />

Under the Stock Option Incentive Plan approved<br />

by stockholders in 1951 which made available up to<br />

2,600,000 shares, options to purchase common stock<br />

have been granted at various times beginning in 1951<br />

to key management employes, such shares of stock to<br />

be made available from authorized unissued or reacquired<br />

common stock at market price on the date the<br />

options are granted. An option may be exercised in<br />

whole at any time, or in part, from time to time during<br />

the option period, except that during the first year of<br />

the option period it may be exercised only in the event<br />

of death or retirement of the optionee. The option<br />

period begins on the date the option is granted and<br />

ends ten years thereafter, except in cases of death,<br />

retirement or other earlier termination.<br />

During 1960, options for 294,200 shares were<br />

granted to 199 employes at the then market price of<br />

$82.00 per share. By exercise of options granted in<br />

prior years, 62 optionees purchased 2,500 shares at<br />

$20.50 per share, 20,400 shares at $18.50 per share,<br />

30,450 shares at $48.00 per share and 18,950 shares<br />

at $55.00 per share during 1960.<br />

At December 31, 1960, 277 optionees held options<br />

to purchase 518,705 shares at prices ranging from<br />

$18.50 to $82.00 per share for a total of $35,759,810<br />

on options granted at various .times beginning in 1951,<br />

and 267,500 shares were available for future options.<br />

U. S. Government securities set aside<br />

for property additions and replacements<br />

At December 31, 1960, completion of authorized<br />

additions to and replacements of facilities required an<br />

estimated further expenditure of $500,000,000. To the<br />

'end of 1959, $495,000,000 of U. S. Government securities<br />

had been set aside to cover in part such authorjzed<br />

expenditures. During 1960, $195,000,000 was used<br />

for such purpose leaving a balance of $300,000,000<br />

set aside at December 31, 1960.<br />

Wear and exhaustion of facilities<br />

For a number of years, U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> has followed<br />

the policy of reflecting accelerated depreciation on the<br />

33<br />

Notes to<br />

Financia.l Statements<br />

cost of new facilities in the first few years of their lives<br />

when the economic usefulness is greatest. As permitted<br />

under the Internal Revenue Code the declining balance<br />

method of depreciation is being applied to the cost of<br />

certain facilities; and the cost of certain other facilities<br />

is covered by Certificates of Necessity under the Defense<br />

Production Act of 1950 and is being written off<br />

at the rate of 20 per cent per year. The effect thereof<br />

is to charge to income a greater portion of their cost<br />

in the earlier years of life and, therefore, follows the<br />

principle of accelerated depreciation.<br />

The amount included in wear and exhaustion for the<br />

cost of facilities not covered by the declining balance<br />

method of depreciation or Certificates of Necessity<br />

is for the most part related to U. S. <strong>Steel</strong>'s rate of<br />

operations.<br />

Reserves for insurance, contingencies<br />

and accident and hospital expenses<br />

U. S. <strong>Steel</strong> is, for the most part, a self-insurer of<br />

its assets against fire, windstorm, marine and related<br />

losses. The insurance reserve of $50,000,000 is held<br />

available for absorbing possible losses of this character,<br />

and is considered adequate for this purpose.<br />

The reserves for contingencies and accident and<br />

hospital expenses of $64,455,398, provided mainly in<br />

previous years by charges to operations, are held for<br />

exceptional unanticipated losses other than those covered<br />

by the insurance reserve.<br />

Other items<br />

Products and Services Sold - Products and services<br />

sold includes interest, dividends and other income of<br />

$49,637,579 in 1960 and $45,077,476 in 1959.<br />

Wages and Salaries - Wages and salaries totaled<br />

$1,503,971,235 in 1960 of which $1,453,317,932 was<br />

included in costs of products and services sold and<br />

the balance was charged to construction.<br />

Products and Services Bought - Products and services<br />

bought reflects the changes during the year in<br />

inventories and deferred costs. These items increased<br />

during 1960 approximately $143,000,000.


Independent<br />

Auditors' Report<br />

PRICE WATERHOUSE & Co.<br />

To the Stockholders of<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong>:<br />

56 PINE STREET<br />

NEW YORK 5<br />

February 28, 1961<br />

As independent auditors elected at the annual meeting of stockholders of <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> held on May 2, 1960, we have examined the Consolidated<br />

Statement of Financial Position of <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> and<br />

subsidiaries at December 31, 1960 and the Consolidated Statement of Income for<br />

the year 1960. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted<br />

aUditing standards and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records<br />

and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.<br />

In our opinion, the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial Position<br />

and related Statement of Income present fairly the position of <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong><br />

<strong>Corporation</strong> and subsidiaries at December 31, 1960 and the results of the year's<br />

operations, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied<br />

on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.<br />

34


Plant and equipment (at cost)<br />

Details of<br />

Selected Items<br />

Balance Balance<br />

Dec. 31, 1959 Additions Deductions Dec. 31,1960<br />

Land $ 82,493,162 $ 1,146,440 $ 119,954 $ 83,519,648<br />

Plant, mineral and manufacturing 5,071,111,975 426,028,204 75,998,696 5,421,141,483<br />

Transportation 738,421,578 65,227,248 5,330,756 798,318,070<br />

Less<br />

Total . 5,892,026,715 492,401,892 81,449,406 6,302,979,201<br />

Depreciation and depletion<br />

Plant, mineral and manufacturing 3,005,867,456 200,546,995 74,956,617 3,131,457,834<br />

Transportation . 374,318,461 13,616,808 3,967,212 383,968,057<br />

Total 3,380,185,917 214,163,803t 78,923,829 3,515,425,891<br />

Net $2,511,840,798 $278,238,089 $ 2,525,577:\: $2,787,553,310<br />

t Wear and exhaustion of $208,424,291 shown in the Consolidated<br />

Statement of Income comprises depreciation and depletion of<br />

$214,163,803 (including amortization of emergency facilities of<br />

$13,766,422), less profit of $5,739,512 resulting from sales.<br />

Reserves<br />

:j: Includes $8,265,089 proceeds from sales and salvage of plant and<br />

equipment, less profit of $5,739,512 resulting therefrom.<br />

Balance Additions Balance<br />

Dec. 31, 1959 charged income Deductions Dec. 31,1960<br />

Estimated bad debts $ 12,500,325 $ 342,955 $ 235,216 $ 12,608,064<br />

Estimated losses on investments 5,578,033 3,781 39,830 5,621,644<br />

Total deducted from assets 18,078,358 346,736 195,386 18,229,708<br />

Insurance 50,000,000 2,780,235 2,780,235 50,000,000<br />

Contingencies 53,273,672 1,727,500 55,001,172<br />

Accident and hospital expenses. 9,454,226 20,014,327 20,014,327 9,454,226<br />

Total 112,727,898 22,794,562 21,067,062 114,455,398<br />

Total reserves $130,806,256 $23,141,298 $21,262,448 $132,685,106<br />

35


Details of<br />

Selected Items (continued)<br />

Inventories<br />

Ore, limestone, coal and coke.<br />

Semi-finished products<br />

Non-ferrous metals<br />

Finished products .<br />

Supplies and sundry items<br />

Cost (less billings) of contracts in progress<br />

Total .<br />

The major portion of inventories is carried at cost as determined under the last-in,<br />

first-out method, and the remainder is carried at cost or market, whichever is lower.<br />

Long-term debt<br />

Description<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

Sinking Fund Debentures (Callable)<br />

Serial Debentures (Callable) . . .<br />

Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company<br />

Pittsburg, Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company<br />

First Mortgage Series A (Callable). . . . . .<br />

Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company<br />

First Mortgage Serial Bonds (Callable)<br />

Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company<br />

First Mortgage Series A (Callable) .<br />

Union Railroad Company<br />

First and Refunding Mortgage Series A (Callable) .<br />

Real estate mortgages and purchase money obligations<br />

Bonds covered by deposits with trustees<br />

Total long-term debt<br />

Less amount due within one year<br />

Long-term debt due after one year<br />

36<br />

Interest<br />

rates<br />

4<br />

Var.<br />

218<br />

2Vz<br />

31;4<br />

3<br />

Years of<br />

maturity<br />

1983<br />

1961-1964<br />

1996<br />

1961-1962<br />

1970<br />

1996<br />

Dec. 31,1960 Dec. 31, 1959<br />

$292,832,700 $222,067,124<br />

173,259,739 158,530,393<br />

23,085,211 25,617,557<br />

165,407,391 122,481,961<br />

51,411,176 52,690,288<br />

19,602,899 14,954,563<br />

$725,599,116 $596,341,886<br />

Outstanding Decrease<br />

Dec. 31, 1960 in year<br />

$300,000,000<br />

120,000,000 $30,000,000<br />

9,841,000 195,000<br />

2,400,000 1,200,000<br />

12,860,000 27,000<br />

6,579,000 114,000<br />

2,541,447 1,301,544<br />

210,000 3fJ,OOO<br />

454,431,447 32,805,544<br />

31,652,777 1,136,767<br />

$422,778,670 $31,668,777<br />

-----


<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund, Trustee<br />

(Described on pages 18-19)<br />

STATEMENT of ASSETS<br />

Investments, at cost (less than aggregate market or estimated fair value)<br />

(details on page 39) .<br />

Cash<br />

Accrued interest and other receivables<br />

Contributions receivable from employing companies in subsequent period<br />

Payables<br />

Assets<br />

Reserves for investments<br />

Assets, less reserves<br />

STATEMENT of CHANGES DURING the YEAR<br />

Dec. 31, 1960<br />

$1,360,593,945<br />

2,620,641<br />

9,116,326<br />

5,562,385<br />

142,677<br />

1,377,750,720<br />

39,314,000<br />

$1,338,436,720<br />

Year 1960<br />

Balance at beginning of year $1,228,792,515<br />

Additions<br />

Receipts from employing companies 87,225,584<br />

Receipts from participating employes 6,796,192<br />

Income from investments . . . . . 55,516,186<br />

Gain on disposition of investments . 3,555,929<br />

Deductions<br />

Pension payments<br />

1,381,886,406<br />

42,515,844<br />

Refunds to withdrawing employes 933,842<br />

43,449,686<br />

Balance at end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,338,436,720<br />

38<br />

Dec. 31, 1959<br />

$1,241,887,029<br />

3,642,727<br />

7,954,253<br />

15,558,265<br />

936,769<br />

1,268,106,515<br />

39,314,000<br />

$1,228,792,515<br />

Year 1959<br />

$1,103,018,282<br />

104,356,631<br />

7,188,181<br />

46,925,002<br />

2,039,817<br />

1,263,527,913<br />

33,972,262<br />

763,136<br />

34,735,398<br />

$1,228,792,515


<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund, Trustee<br />

SUMMARY of INVESTMENTS<br />

Securities of <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> and Subsidiaries<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Serial Debentures $ 24,446,870<br />

Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company First Mortgage Series A 2,685,425<br />

Pittsburg, Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company<br />

First Mortgage Series A. . . . . . . . . . . 2,305,898<br />

At December 31, 1960<br />

Union Railroad Company First and Refunding Mortgage Series A 6,579,000 $ 36,017,193<br />

Other bonds, notes and debentures<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Government 167,524,631<br />

Other 447,456,829 614,981,460<br />

Preferred stocks 1,581,483<br />

Common stocks (including bank and insurance company stocks) 531,586,975<br />

Mortgages<br />

Oil, gas and other payments and royalties<br />

Properties owned . . . . . .<br />

Total investments, at cost<br />

To the Board of Directors of<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund:<br />

We have examined the Statement of Assets, Statement of<br />

Changes During the Year and Summary of Investments of<br />

the combined pension trusts administered by <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

<strong>Steel</strong> and Carnegie Pension Fund as trustee. Our examination<br />

was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing<br />

standards and included confirmation of the cash and<br />

investments owned at December 31, 1960 by certificates<br />

obtained from the depositaries and custodians, or by inspec-<br />

39<br />

18,231,984<br />

41,273,022<br />

116,921,828<br />

$1,360,593,945<br />

tion, and such tests of the accounting records and such<br />

other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the<br />

circumstances.<br />

In our opinion, the foregoing statements present fairly<br />

the combined assets of these pension trusts at December 31,<br />

1960 and the changes therein during the year.<br />

New York 5, N. Y.<br />

February 28, 1961.


American Bridge Division, 525 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh 30, Pa.<br />

American <strong>Steel</strong> & Wire Division, Rockefeller Bldg., Cleveland 13, Ohio<br />

Columbia-Geneva <strong>Steel</strong> Division, 120 Montgomery St., San Francisco 6, Cal.<br />

Consolidated Western <strong>Steel</strong> Division, 5700 So. Eastern Ave., Los Angeles 22, Cal.<br />

Michigan Limestone Division, 2650 Guardian Building, Detroit 26, Mich.<br />

National Tube Division, 525 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh 30, Pa.<br />

Oil Well Supply Division, 2001 North Lamar Street, Dallas 2, Texas<br />

Oliver Iron Mining Division, Wolvin Building, Duluth 2, Minn.<br />

Pittsburgh Steamship Division, Rockefeller Building, Cleveland 13, Ohio<br />

Tennessee Coal & Iron Division, P. O. Box 599, Fairfield, Ala.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Homes Division, 525 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh 30, Pa.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Products Division, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York 20, N. Y.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Supply Division, 208 So. LaSalle Street, Chicago 4, Ill.<br />

Universal Atlas Cement Division, 100 Park Avenue, New York 17, N. Y.<br />

Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Frick Building, Pittsburgh 19, Pa.<br />

Birmingham Southern Railroad Co., Parker Building, Fairfield, Ala.<br />

Carnegie Natural Gas Company, Frick Building, Pittsburgh 19, Pa.<br />

Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Ry. Co., Wolvin Building, Duluth 2, Minn.<br />

Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Ry. Co., 208 So. LaSalle Street, Chicago 4, Ill.<br />

Newburgh and South Shore Railway Co., Frick Building, Pittsburgh 19, Pa.<br />

Orinoco Mining Company, Apartado No. 2736, Caracas, Venezuela<br />

Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Company, Conneaut, Ohio<br />

Quebec Cartier Mining Company, Port Cartier, Province of Quebec, Canada<br />

Union Railroad Company, Frick Building, Pittsburgh 19, Pa.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> Export Company, 100 Church Street, New York 8, N. Y.<br />

Transfer Agents - Preferred and Common Stock<br />

Registrars<br />

Offices of the <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

71 Broadway, New York 6, N. Y<br />

51 Newark Street, Hoboken, N. J.<br />

Preferred Stock<br />

Common Stock<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

PRESIDENT<br />

J. Donald Rollins<br />

Van H. Leichliter<br />

J. D. McCall<br />

Charles W. Lee<br />

Carl G. Hogberg<br />

Henry J. Wallace<br />

Frederick F. Murray<br />

Christian F. Beukema<br />

Charles R. Khoury<br />

Arthur V. Wiebel<br />

David H. Boyd<br />

Loring S. Brock<br />

John H. Morava<br />

Charles B. Baker<br />

Fred W. Okie<br />

Claud D. Cotten, Jr.<br />

Thomas H. Evans<br />

Fred J. Voss<br />

Thomas D. Beven<br />

Daniel J. Smith<br />

Francis Thomas<br />

Keith C. Stevens<br />

Lloyd J. Severson<br />

Fred W. Okie<br />

William S. Morrison<br />

City National Bank and Trust Company<br />

of Chicago<br />

208 South La Salle Street, Chicago 90, Ill.<br />

Chemical Bank New York Trust Company, New York 15, N. Y<br />

Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago,<br />

Chicago 90, Ill.<br />

Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York 15, N. Y<br />

Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago,<br />

Chicago 90, Ill.


PRINTED IN U.S.A.<br />

Directors<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

71 Broadway, New York 6, N. Y.<br />

525 William Penn Place, Pittsburgh 30, Pa.<br />

Charles H. Bell Philip R. Clarke John A. Fuller John M. Meyer, Jr.*<br />

James B. Black Cleo F. Craig"'t Clifford F. Hood'" Alexander C. Nagle*t<br />

Roger M. Blough*t Harry P. Davison"'t Arthur A. Houghton, Jr.* Joseph P. Spang, Jr.'"<br />

Cason J. Callaway Benjamin F. Fairless* C. Jared Ingersoll'" Robert C. Tyson':'t<br />

Enders M. Voorhees"'t Leslie B. Worthington':'t<br />

Officers<br />

* Member of Executive Committee t Member of Finance Committee<br />

Roger M. Blough<br />

Leslie B. Worthington<br />

Robert C. Tyson<br />

John S. Tennant<br />

William H. Lang<br />

Wilbert A. Walker<br />

Benjamin L. Rawlins<br />

R. Conrad Cooper - Personnel Services<br />

Edwin H. Gott - Production<br />

Stephen M. Jenks - Engineering and Research<br />

John E. Angle<br />

Marcus 1. Aurelius<br />

James B. Austin<br />

Russell M. Braund<br />

Phelps H. Adams<br />

Herbert F. Byrne<br />

Robert C. Colbaugh, Jr.<br />

Jesse F. Core<br />

Bay E. Estes, Jr.<br />

Francis M. Goodwin, 1r.<br />

Robert W. Graham<br />

Chairman of Board of Directors<br />

President and Chairman of Executive Committee<br />

Chairman of Finance Committee<br />

General Counsel<br />

Administrative Vice President and Treasurer<br />

Administrative Vice President and Comptroller<br />

Secretary and Assistant General Counsel<br />

Executive Vice Presidents<br />

Administrative Vice Presidents<br />

Marcus M. Chapman James C. Gray<br />

Bennett S. Chapple, J r. R.Heath Larry<br />

John H. Elliott Robert M. Lloyd<br />

Marcus M. Fisher Maxwell D. Millard<br />

Charles H. Williams<br />

Vice Presidents<br />

J. Douglas Darby - Assistant to President<br />

Phillips Hawkins Wilbur L. Lohrentz<br />

William L. Hearne Oscar T. Marzke<br />

Randolph W. Hyde Norman C. Michels<br />

Leverne J. King Ralph C. Moffitt<br />

James W. Kinnear, Jr.<br />

Max W. Lightner<br />

Edward C. Logelin<br />

•<br />

Howard 1. Mullin<br />

Edward C. Myers<br />

James L. Ortner<br />

Norman B. Obbard - International<br />

John Pugsley - Accounting<br />

Richard F. Sentner - Commercial<br />

Austin J. Paddock<br />

Edgar B. Speer<br />

George M. Thursby<br />

C. Burton Vernooy<br />

Lewis M. Parsons<br />

Hugh J. Phillips, Jr.<br />

E. Grosvenor Plowman<br />

Louis J. Rohl<br />

J. Warren Shaver<br />

Edwin L. Tindall<br />

John L. Young<br />

Thomas F. Lynch, Associate General Counsel Leroy L. Lewis, General Solicitor<br />

Merrill Russell, A ssiSlant General Solicitor<br />

•<br />

Bradford B. Smith, Economist

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!