16.08.2013 Views

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Simulation ofa Load Balancing Routing Protocol Chapter 3<br />

intennediate nodes to respond to route requests prevents the further propagation of<br />

the route request, congestion can result in the network.<br />

0<br />

0 0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 0 node<br />

0 • congested node<br />

route<br />

Figure 3-2. Network congestion due to intermediate routes replying to<br />

route requests<br />

3.2.2. Original DLAR Schemes<br />

The authors [GerlaOO] of DLAR originally suggested 3 schemes that could be used.<br />

The three schemes vary in the manner in which the buffers at each intennediate node<br />

are evaluated. The three DLAR schemes operate as follows:<br />

a) DLAR scheme 1: The first scheme adds the routing load of each intennediate<br />

node on the route and selects the route with the least sum of data packets in<br />

the buffers. Iftwo or more routes have the same sum of data packets, then the<br />

shorter route is selected. If the shortest routes are the same length then the<br />

route whose route request arrived first is the route that is selected as the most<br />

appropriate.<br />

b) DLAR scheme 2: The second scheme uses the average number of packets<br />

buffered at each intermediate node. The route with the lowest average<br />

number of buffered packets is selected as the best route to use. The tiebreaker<br />

3-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!