16.08.2013 Views

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

Gugrajah_Yuvaan_ Ramesh_2003.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Simulation ofa Load Balancing Routing Protocol<br />

3.6. Traffic Model<br />

Chapter 3<br />

Two packet buffers are maintained at each node, each being buffer_length packets<br />

long. One buffer contains data packets and the other routing information packets<br />

(route requests, route replies and route error packets). Routing information packets<br />

have the higher priority. Packets are dropped if they are in a queue for longer than<br />

pkCtimeout seconds.<br />

[Broch98], [Johannson99] and [DasOl] used constant bit rate (CBR) sources and<br />

varied the number of sources for different simulation runs in order to determine the<br />

effects of traffic load. The source nodes selected to be CBR sources were the only<br />

nodes throughout the simulation that generated traffic and the associated destination<br />

nodes for each source node also never changed. A different approach was<br />

implemented for traffic generation for the simulations discussed herein in an attempt<br />

to create stochastic behaviour.<br />

Each node is assigned a random Packet Generation Time (POT), normally distributed<br />

between 0 and a maximum packet generation time PGT. After POT seconds, the node<br />

selects a destination node randomly and generates session_length packets each of<br />

pkt_length bytes to be transmitted to the selected node. The packets are added to the<br />

appropriate buffer and the node assigns itself a new POT.<br />

3.7. Simulation Procedure<br />

The custom built simulator was used to compare AODV to the four DLAR schemes<br />

in terms of packet delivery ratio and delay. A total of 24 simulations were run for<br />

each of the four routing protocols for 3600s of simulation time. By varying the pause<br />

time from a low pause time to a high pause time, the network topology was varied<br />

from highly dynamic topologies with constant node movement to slow changing<br />

topologies with longer pause times. There were four different pause times used: 0,<br />

25s, 50s and 150s. For each pause time the load was varied for six different values of<br />

PGT: 0.25s, 0.5s, Is, 2s, 5s and 10s.<br />

3-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!