17.08.2013 Views

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>update</strong><br />

S.F. 2458, authored by Marty, prohibits<br />

political parties from making independent<br />

expenditures on their candidates<br />

as a condition of receiving a<br />

public subsidy. The ban applies to<br />

primaries and general elections and is<br />

effective at the start of the next election<br />

cycle, Jan. 1, 2001.<br />

According to written testimony<br />

submitted by David Schultz, a professor<br />

at Hamlin University, parties are now<br />

free to make independent expenditures<br />

on behalf of specific candidates. Schultz<br />

went on to say this is because the<br />

Republican Party of <strong>Minnesota</strong> was<br />

successful in a lawsuit last fall that<br />

challenged the existing law and now<br />

special interests seeking to influence<br />

campaigns and elections can use the<br />

recent court decision as a new avenue of<br />

influence.<br />

“Most people are not aware there has<br />

been a change,” said Marty. “<strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

has been spared from big soft money<br />

expenditures. Opening this loophole<br />

opens the floodgates (for soft money<br />

expenditures),” he said. Marty said his<br />

bill returns the law to what it was before<br />

the court ruling last September.<br />

Sen. Mark Ourada (R-Buffalo)<br />

doubted whether the bill would help. “I<br />

would just as soon not have any independent<br />

expenditures, but if we pass the<br />

bill it will be meaningless, there are<br />

ways around it,” he said. Sen. Roger<br />

Moe (DFL-Erskine) raised the same<br />

issue. “All of us have the same goal, to<br />

limit the amount of money that goes<br />

into the political process. But x amount<br />

of money will get into the political<br />

process some way. We need a good<br />

system of disclosure,” he said.<br />

The committee approved an amendment,<br />

offered by Marty, to the bill to<br />

make it effective immediately after<br />

enactment. However, the bill failed to<br />

gain the committee’s approval on a<br />

voice vote.<br />

Environment and Natural<br />

Resources<br />

Hunting permit bill okayed<br />

The Environment and Natural<br />

Resources <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by Sen.<br />

Bob Lessard (DFL-Int’l Falls) met Wed.,<br />

Feb. 8, and okayed a bill tightening<br />

eligibility qualifications for special<br />

Department of Natural Resources<br />

6<br />

(DNR) hunting permits issued to<br />

disabled hunters.<br />

S.F. 2346, authored by Sen. Jane<br />

Krentz (DFL-May Township) permits a<br />

hunter with a permanent physical<br />

disability to use a snowmobile, ATV or<br />

other vehicle to hunt wildlife management<br />

areas as long as the disability is<br />

verified in writing by a physician or<br />

chiropractor. Disabilities are defined as<br />

those that prevent the hunter from<br />

stepping from a vehicle without aid of a<br />

wheelchair, crutches, braces, or other<br />

mechanical support or prosthetic<br />

devices. Also, those disabilities that<br />

prevent the hunter from walking any<br />

distance because of a permanent lung,<br />

heart, or other internal disease that<br />

requires the person to use supplemental<br />

oxygen to assist breathing.<br />

The bill is designed to prevent abuse<br />

of the system that allows the permits,<br />

Krentz said. “The number of applications<br />

has risen from 600 a few years ago<br />

when the DNR first began issuing these<br />

permits to more than 3,000 last year,”<br />

she said. “Many of those were legitimate<br />

applicants; I’m sure some were not.”<br />

Jonathan Leslie, representing Capable<br />

Partners, a non-profit organization of<br />

sportsmen that provides outdoors<br />

opportunities for the physically challenged,<br />

spoke in support of the measure.<br />

“We want to maintain the integrity of<br />

the deer herd and the integrity of the<br />

program for the deserving disabled,” he<br />

said.<br />

John Hauck, also representing<br />

Capable Partners, said the <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Council on Disabilities also supports the<br />

bill.<br />

The bill was approved and referred to<br />

the floor.<br />

The committee also approved a bill<br />

extending the angling season for<br />

walleye, sauger, northern pike, muskellunge,<br />

large and small-mouth bass by<br />

two weeks statewide. S.F. 2763,<br />

authored by Sen. Pat Pariseau (R-<br />

Farmington), is designed to help<br />

Northern <strong>Minnesota</strong> businesses suffering<br />

effects of the mild winter by allowing<br />

anglers an extra two weeks, from Feb. 29<br />

to March 15, to remove icehouses from<br />

lakes. The bill was approved and<br />

referred to the floor.<br />

The committee also approved four<br />

bills authorizing land transactions in<br />

various parts of the state.<br />

S.F. 2456, authored by Sen. Mark<br />

Ourada (R-Buffalo), conveys to the<br />

cities of St. Michael and Albertville an<br />

agricultural ditch now located within<br />

those cities’ limits. There were no<br />

natural resource issues and no opposition.<br />

The bill was approved and referred<br />

to the Local and Metropolitan Government<br />

<strong>Committee</strong>.<br />

S.F. 2444, authored by Sen. Cal<br />

Larson (R-Fergus Falls), conveys to<br />

Stearns County 280 acres of land that<br />

housed the former Sauk Centre Home<br />

School. The bill was approved and<br />

referred to the floor.<br />

S.F. 2033, authored by Sen. Roger D.<br />

More (DFL-Erskine), authorizes Norman<br />

County to sell 2.73 acres of tax-forfeited<br />

land to a private party or parties.<br />

The bill was approved and referred to<br />

the floor.<br />

S.F. 2542, authored by Lessard, allows<br />

Aitkin County to sell about 60 ft. of<br />

tax-forfeited land bordering public<br />

water to a private party or parties. The<br />

bill was approved and referred to the<br />

floor.<br />

Environment and<br />

Agriculture Budget Division<br />

Panel hears need for CREP<br />

Members of the Environment and<br />

Agriculture Budget Division, chaired by<br />

Sen. Jane Krentz (DFL-May Township),<br />

on Fri., Feb. 4, heard a presentation<br />

from the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Board of Water and<br />

Soil Resources (BWSR) underscoring<br />

the need to support a joint federal-state<br />

conservation program for farmers along<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> River and its tributaries.<br />

The Conservation Reserve Enhancement<br />

Program (CREP) matches about<br />

2.5 federal dollars for every one state<br />

dollar for various cleanup and protection<br />

projects in the <strong>Minnesota</strong> River<br />

watershed. Planting trees, shrubs or<br />

grassy buffer zones along environmentally<br />

sensitive lands in the watershed are<br />

among some of the projects. The farmer<br />

receives an up-front payment from the<br />

state for signing a 15-year contract with<br />

the federal government to permanently<br />

remove such lands from production.<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> can enroll up to 100,000<br />

acres, or 1 percent, of agricultural land<br />

in the area by Sept. 30, 2002. This will<br />

require a total of $60 million from the<br />

2000 and 2002 <strong>Legislature</strong>s in order to<br />

take advantage of the available match-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!