Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>update</strong><br />
representatives. The bill is effective for<br />
the state primary election in 2002.<br />
Walter Klaus, former Legislator, said the<br />
bill makes things easier for everyone<br />
involved. Paiseau added that citizens<br />
are confused because of crossing congressional<br />
district and state legislative<br />
district lines. Mike Lindsey, a private<br />
citizen, active in the Republican party,<br />
testified, “this issue is in both party platforms.<br />
Now is a perfect time (to act).”<br />
He said at the local level, the crossing<br />
lines cause administrative difficulties<br />
and confusion. “It’s an operational<br />
nightmare,” he said. Moe said the bill is<br />
problematic and expressed concern<br />
about having an even number of Senators.<br />
The bill failed on a divided vote.<br />
Local election bill okayed<br />
Three bills were presented before the<br />
Election Laws <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by<br />
Sen. John Marty (DFL-Roseville), Wed.,<br />
Feb. 16.<br />
Sen. Edward Oliver (R-Deephaven),<br />
authored S.F. 2291, which allows the<br />
city of Shorewood to change from an atlarge<br />
election of city council members<br />
to election by ward. Woody Love,<br />
mayor of Shorewood, outlined 3 reasons<br />
why the change is being requested. He<br />
said a ward system will assure that the<br />
various geographical areas of the city<br />
are represented on the city council.<br />
Secondly, a ward system will help keep a<br />
sense of “place.” Thirdly, because of the<br />
city’s geographic layout, campaigning<br />
door-to-door can be a daunting challenge<br />
for city council candidates. He<br />
added that 2 former mayors also support<br />
the bill. The bill was adopted and<br />
recommended for the Consent Calendar.<br />
Marty offered an amendment that<br />
would allow cities to decide the issue of<br />
election by ward on their own with<br />
approval by a majority of voters in the<br />
city. “It’s a local control issue,” he said.<br />
Marty didn’t call for a vote to amend<br />
S.F 2291 but urged members to think<br />
about the idea.<br />
S.F. 3102, authored by Marty, requires<br />
campaign finance and lobbyist reports<br />
and economic interest statements to be<br />
filed with the Campaign Finance and<br />
Public Disclosure Board electronically<br />
and posted on its web site. The board<br />
may not include the home address or<br />
telephone number of an individual.<br />
Jeanne Olson, executive director, said<br />
the board has software available for<br />
8<br />
candidates. “We’re anxious to have it<br />
used,” said Olson. Sen. Mark Ourada<br />
(R-Buffalo) raised concerns about what<br />
type of information would be disclosed.<br />
Olson said the information is already<br />
public information. Marty added that<br />
the bill simply puts the existing information<br />
on a searchable data base. The<br />
bill was approved and sent to the floor.<br />
Sen. Ember Junge (DFL-New Hope),<br />
presented S.F. 500, a bill dealing with<br />
campaign spending limits. The bill does<br />
several things including raising the<br />
spending limit for constitutional officers<br />
other than the governor and lieutenant<br />
governor. The bill also allows a losing<br />
candidate to contribute to the<br />
candidate’s own campaign twice as<br />
much as now permitted and allows an<br />
unlimited amount to pay debts when the<br />
committee is terminated. Junge said the<br />
bill was introduced last year, but the<br />
language is now part of another bill tied<br />
up in conference committee. She said<br />
she’s optimistic the bill will pass but is<br />
carrying S.F. 500 as a separate bill just<br />
in case. The bill was adopted and sent<br />
to the floor.<br />
Environment and Natural<br />
Resources<br />
Monarch butterfly bill advanced<br />
Members of the Environment and<br />
Natural Resources <strong>Committee</strong>, meeting<br />
Mon., Feb. 14, approved a bill naming<br />
the monarch butterfly as <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s<br />
state butterfly. The committee is<br />
chaired by Sen. Bob Lessard (DFL-Int’l.<br />
Falls).<br />
S.F. 2326, authored by Charles Wiger<br />
(DFL-North St. Paul), was inspired by a<br />
group of fourth graders at O.H. Anderson<br />
grade school in Mahtomedi. The<br />
students studied Monarch butterflies<br />
last fall.<br />
One of the students, Gina Bruns,<br />
offered one of her reasons for wishing to<br />
have the Monarch become the state<br />
butterfly. “If we can have a state muffin<br />
[blueberry], we should have a state<br />
butterfly, too,” she said. “If this bill<br />
passes, <strong>Minnesota</strong> would be the 21st<br />
state to have a state butterfly,” added<br />
Rebecca LaFoy, another student.<br />
“The monarch is a great teacher about<br />
the world around us,” said Cheryl<br />
Miller, of the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Audubon<br />
Society. An example is the butterflies’<br />
seasonal migration from <strong>Minnesota</strong> to<br />
Mexico and vice-versa, a journey of<br />
2,000 miles or more, she said.<br />
The bill was approved and re-referred<br />
to the Government Operations and<br />
Veterans <strong>Committee</strong>.<br />
The committee also approved a bill<br />
authorizing markings of canoe and<br />
boating routes along a portion of the<br />
Chippewa River. S.F. 2573, authored by<br />
Sen. Charles Berg (IND-Chokio),<br />
authorizes a 42.8-mile portion of the<br />
Chippewa, from Benson to Montevideo,<br />
to be marked for historic points of<br />
interest, portages, camp sites, dams,<br />
rapids, etc. The bill was approved and<br />
recommended for the consent calendar.<br />
The committee also discussed a bill<br />
that allows the recovery of sunken logs<br />
on inland waters. S.F. 2546, authored by<br />
Sen. Dan Stevens (R-Mora), proposes a<br />
$500 and $2,500 permit for residents<br />
and non-residents, respectively, to<br />
recover sunken logs on inland waters.<br />
The bill specifies a three-year lease<br />
period and methods to be allowed in the<br />
recovery efforts. The measure also<br />
requires that articles of historical<br />
significance discovered in recovery be<br />
reported to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Historical<br />
Society. The committee laid the bill<br />
over for further consideration.<br />
Sunken log bill heard<br />
The Environment and Natural<br />
Resources <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by Sen.<br />
Bob Lessard (DFL-Int’l. Falls), met<br />
Weds., Feb. 16, and heard a number of<br />
bills, including a “sunken log” bill that<br />
permits harvesting logs submerged in<br />
inland waters.<br />
S.F. 2546, authored by Sen. Dan<br />
Stevens (R-Mora), permits raising and<br />
removing logs that are submerged to a<br />
depth of 20 ft. or more by winching.<br />
Such removal would require a permit<br />
from the Department of Natural Resources<br />
(DNR) - $500 for residents and<br />
$2,500 for non-residents, according to<br />
the bill. Under the bill, historical<br />
artifacts found during removal must be<br />
reported to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Historical<br />
Society within one business day. The<br />
bill also provides that DNR commissioner<br />
must report to the <strong>Legislature</strong> no<br />
later than June 30, 2000, on the status<br />
of sunken logs. The bill was approved<br />
and referred to the Environment and<br />
Agriculture Budget Division.<br />
S.F. 2700, authored by Sen. Dick Day