17.08.2013 Views

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>update</strong><br />

representatives. The bill is effective for<br />

the state primary election in 2002.<br />

Walter Klaus, former Legislator, said the<br />

bill makes things easier for everyone<br />

involved. Paiseau added that citizens<br />

are confused because of crossing congressional<br />

district and state legislative<br />

district lines. Mike Lindsey, a private<br />

citizen, active in the Republican party,<br />

testified, “this issue is in both party platforms.<br />

Now is a perfect time (to act).”<br />

He said at the local level, the crossing<br />

lines cause administrative difficulties<br />

and confusion. “It’s an operational<br />

nightmare,” he said. Moe said the bill is<br />

problematic and expressed concern<br />

about having an even number of Senators.<br />

The bill failed on a divided vote.<br />

Local election bill okayed<br />

Three bills were presented before the<br />

Election Laws <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by<br />

Sen. John Marty (DFL-Roseville), Wed.,<br />

Feb. 16.<br />

Sen. Edward Oliver (R-Deephaven),<br />

authored S.F. 2291, which allows the<br />

city of Shorewood to change from an atlarge<br />

election of city council members<br />

to election by ward. Woody Love,<br />

mayor of Shorewood, outlined 3 reasons<br />

why the change is being requested. He<br />

said a ward system will assure that the<br />

various geographical areas of the city<br />

are represented on the city council.<br />

Secondly, a ward system will help keep a<br />

sense of “place.” Thirdly, because of the<br />

city’s geographic layout, campaigning<br />

door-to-door can be a daunting challenge<br />

for city council candidates. He<br />

added that 2 former mayors also support<br />

the bill. The bill was adopted and<br />

recommended for the Consent Calendar.<br />

Marty offered an amendment that<br />

would allow cities to decide the issue of<br />

election by ward on their own with<br />

approval by a majority of voters in the<br />

city. “It’s a local control issue,” he said.<br />

Marty didn’t call for a vote to amend<br />

S.F 2291 but urged members to think<br />

about the idea.<br />

S.F. 3102, authored by Marty, requires<br />

campaign finance and lobbyist reports<br />

and economic interest statements to be<br />

filed with the Campaign Finance and<br />

Public Disclosure Board electronically<br />

and posted on its web site. The board<br />

may not include the home address or<br />

telephone number of an individual.<br />

Jeanne Olson, executive director, said<br />

the board has software available for<br />

8<br />

candidates. “We’re anxious to have it<br />

used,” said Olson. Sen. Mark Ourada<br />

(R-Buffalo) raised concerns about what<br />

type of information would be disclosed.<br />

Olson said the information is already<br />

public information. Marty added that<br />

the bill simply puts the existing information<br />

on a searchable data base. The<br />

bill was approved and sent to the floor.<br />

Sen. Ember Junge (DFL-New Hope),<br />

presented S.F. 500, a bill dealing with<br />

campaign spending limits. The bill does<br />

several things including raising the<br />

spending limit for constitutional officers<br />

other than the governor and lieutenant<br />

governor. The bill also allows a losing<br />

candidate to contribute to the<br />

candidate’s own campaign twice as<br />

much as now permitted and allows an<br />

unlimited amount to pay debts when the<br />

committee is terminated. Junge said the<br />

bill was introduced last year, but the<br />

language is now part of another bill tied<br />

up in conference committee. She said<br />

she’s optimistic the bill will pass but is<br />

carrying S.F. 500 as a separate bill just<br />

in case. The bill was adopted and sent<br />

to the floor.<br />

Environment and Natural<br />

Resources<br />

Monarch butterfly bill advanced<br />

Members of the Environment and<br />

Natural Resources <strong>Committee</strong>, meeting<br />

Mon., Feb. 14, approved a bill naming<br />

the monarch butterfly as <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s<br />

state butterfly. The committee is<br />

chaired by Sen. Bob Lessard (DFL-Int’l.<br />

Falls).<br />

S.F. 2326, authored by Charles Wiger<br />

(DFL-North St. Paul), was inspired by a<br />

group of fourth graders at O.H. Anderson<br />

grade school in Mahtomedi. The<br />

students studied Monarch butterflies<br />

last fall.<br />

One of the students, Gina Bruns,<br />

offered one of her reasons for wishing to<br />

have the Monarch become the state<br />

butterfly. “If we can have a state muffin<br />

[blueberry], we should have a state<br />

butterfly, too,” she said. “If this bill<br />

passes, <strong>Minnesota</strong> would be the 21st<br />

state to have a state butterfly,” added<br />

Rebecca LaFoy, another student.<br />

“The monarch is a great teacher about<br />

the world around us,” said Cheryl<br />

Miller, of the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Audubon<br />

Society. An example is the butterflies’<br />

seasonal migration from <strong>Minnesota</strong> to<br />

Mexico and vice-versa, a journey of<br />

2,000 miles or more, she said.<br />

The bill was approved and re-referred<br />

to the Government Operations and<br />

Veterans <strong>Committee</strong>.<br />

The committee also approved a bill<br />

authorizing markings of canoe and<br />

boating routes along a portion of the<br />

Chippewa River. S.F. 2573, authored by<br />

Sen. Charles Berg (IND-Chokio),<br />

authorizes a 42.8-mile portion of the<br />

Chippewa, from Benson to Montevideo,<br />

to be marked for historic points of<br />

interest, portages, camp sites, dams,<br />

rapids, etc. The bill was approved and<br />

recommended for the consent calendar.<br />

The committee also discussed a bill<br />

that allows the recovery of sunken logs<br />

on inland waters. S.F. 2546, authored by<br />

Sen. Dan Stevens (R-Mora), proposes a<br />

$500 and $2,500 permit for residents<br />

and non-residents, respectively, to<br />

recover sunken logs on inland waters.<br />

The bill specifies a three-year lease<br />

period and methods to be allowed in the<br />

recovery efforts. The measure also<br />

requires that articles of historical<br />

significance discovered in recovery be<br />

reported to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Historical<br />

Society. The committee laid the bill<br />

over for further consideration.<br />

Sunken log bill heard<br />

The Environment and Natural<br />

Resources <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by Sen.<br />

Bob Lessard (DFL-Int’l. Falls), met<br />

Weds., Feb. 16, and heard a number of<br />

bills, including a “sunken log” bill that<br />

permits harvesting logs submerged in<br />

inland waters.<br />

S.F. 2546, authored by Sen. Dan<br />

Stevens (R-Mora), permits raising and<br />

removing logs that are submerged to a<br />

depth of 20 ft. or more by winching.<br />

Such removal would require a permit<br />

from the Department of Natural Resources<br />

(DNR) - $500 for residents and<br />

$2,500 for non-residents, according to<br />

the bill. Under the bill, historical<br />

artifacts found during removal must be<br />

reported to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Historical<br />

Society within one business day. The<br />

bill also provides that DNR commissioner<br />

must report to the <strong>Legislature</strong> no<br />

later than June 30, 2000, on the status<br />

of sunken logs. The bill was approved<br />

and referred to the Environment and<br />

Agriculture Budget Division.<br />

S.F. 2700, authored by Sen. Dick Day

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!