Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
Committee update - Minnesota State Legislature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Committee</strong> <strong>update</strong><br />
plan reimbursements. Hiendlmayr said<br />
he believes the level of regulation is<br />
appropriate and that reimbursements<br />
are made by medical plan providers<br />
when the system is understood.<br />
Health and Family Security<br />
Budget Division<br />
Budget overview heard<br />
When the Health and Family Security<br />
Budget Division met Tue., Feb. 8,<br />
presentations explaining capitol budget<br />
requests filled the agenda. Sen. Don<br />
Samuelson (DFL-Brainerd) chaired the<br />
division, which heard testimony from<br />
representatives of Veterans Homes, the<br />
Dept. of Health, and the Dept. of<br />
Human Services (DHS).<br />
<strong>Minnesota</strong> Veterans Home Board of<br />
Directors Chair Steven O’Connor,<br />
explained the requests for Veterans<br />
Homes funds. The $13.4 million request<br />
is for the maintenance and preservation<br />
of existing facilities and assets, said<br />
O’Connor. Executive Director Steve<br />
Musser said homes in Hastings and<br />
Minneapolis need roofing and ventilation<br />
repairs, and the home in Sliver Bay<br />
has no garage to house its vehicles.<br />
Leaving vehicles outside during <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />
winters is very detrimental to them,<br />
said Samuelson.<br />
Samuelson also invited <strong>State</strong> Commander<br />
of Veterans of Foreign Wars<br />
Dave Adams and former Commissioner<br />
Al Loehr to come before the committee.<br />
Dave Johnson, from the Dept. of<br />
Health, and Assistant Commissioner<br />
Kath Ouska, from the Dept. of Administration,<br />
explained the $4.3 million<br />
request by the department for asset<br />
preservation at 717 Delaware SE. The<br />
30 year old facility current houses<br />
public health laboratories and disease<br />
prevention and control programs,<br />
Johnson said, but ventilation in the<br />
laboratories and computer network<br />
capacity are severely outdated, creating<br />
health and usability complications.<br />
Assistant Commissioner Aggie<br />
Leithieser said that the building’s<br />
location facilitates the Dept. of Health’s<br />
joint grant programs with the University<br />
of <strong>Minnesota</strong> and the employment of<br />
graduate students.<br />
Elaine Timmer, assistant commissioner<br />
for DHS, spoke about the<br />
department’s request for $49.5 million.<br />
12<br />
The majority of the requested funds,<br />
about $26 million, are earmarked for<br />
repairing and remodeling buildings that<br />
the department plans to continue using,<br />
Timmer said. $22 million is requested to<br />
begin the design of a new facility.<br />
Timmer stressed that, like the two<br />
departments who testified before her,<br />
many of the maintenance and renovation<br />
costs in the DHS would be less<br />
should the matter have been addressed<br />
earlier. The costs will only rise while<br />
the buildings are neglected, she said.<br />
Higher Education Budget<br />
Division<br />
MnSCU capital budget heard<br />
Members of the Higher Education<br />
Budget Division, chaired by LeRoy<br />
Stumpf (DFL-Thief River Falls) heard<br />
the <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>State</strong> Colleges and<br />
Universities’ (MnSCU) capital budget<br />
request for $230 million at a hearing<br />
Tues., Feb. 8.<br />
“We’re much better prepared to talk<br />
about bonding proposals now than we<br />
were two years ago,” said Chancellor<br />
Morrie Anderson, adding that the overriding<br />
theme in the 2000 proposal is a<br />
system-wide investment in science and<br />
technology - programs and facilities.<br />
The capital budget proposal is slashed<br />
from $724 million requested by the<br />
system’s presidents in July 1998. The<br />
reduction came after a lengthy and<br />
sometimes painful priority review and<br />
re-evaluation process conducted in the<br />
interim, according to Anderson.<br />
MnSCU’s $230 million capital budget<br />
proposal is broken down into two<br />
components.<br />
One is $130 million for capital<br />
improvements projects, such as additions<br />
for current programs, new construction,<br />
design, infrastructure and<br />
land acquisition. This portion of the<br />
budget focuses heavily on science and<br />
technology. For example, 18 of 23<br />
proposed projects for science and<br />
technology improvements and 11 of 23<br />
projects designed to <strong>update</strong> existing<br />
space in science and technology facilities,<br />
according to Laura King, vice<br />
chancellor, finance.<br />
The other component is $100 million<br />
for asset preservation projects, including<br />
Higher Education Asset Preservation<br />
and Renewal (HEAPR) projects.<br />
Such projects include safety and statutory<br />
projects, such as implementation of<br />
ADA requirements, building exterior,<br />
mechanical, and space restoration.<br />
“We consider our facilities one of our<br />
greatest assets,” said King. According to<br />
condition assessment data collected<br />
since 1998, the average age of buildings<br />
in the system is 28 years old, indicating<br />
repair and maintenance projects will<br />
become increasingly necessary, she said.<br />
Jobs, Energy and Community<br />
Development<br />
Intellectual ownership bill heard<br />
The Jobs, Energy and Community<br />
Development <strong>Committee</strong>, chaired by<br />
Sen. Steven Novak (DFL-New<br />
Brighton), heard a bill concerning<br />
“intellectual ownership” of employee<br />
inventions Fri., Feb. 4. The committee<br />
took no action on the bill.<br />
S. F. 363, the so-called “Creative<br />
Freedom Act,” is authored by Sen.<br />
Charles Wiger (DFL-North St. Paul).<br />
The bill regulates employee invention<br />
agreements commonly signed by<br />
research and development employees<br />
and employers. It provides that an<br />
employer who agrees to develop or use<br />
an employee’s invention or proposal<br />
“must make a decision to do so within<br />
one year of submission, and must make a<br />
substantial investment in the invention<br />
within one year of that decision.”<br />
Failure to do so forfeits all rights and<br />
interests in the invention or proposal<br />
back to the employee.<br />
Robert Nepper, a North St. Paul<br />
inventor who has worked as an engineer<br />
for 30 years for three <strong>Minnesota</strong> Fortune<br />
500 companies, spoke in support of the<br />
bill.<br />
“I hold five patents - all of which are<br />
assigned to my former employers,”<br />
Nepper said. “These firms are great<br />
assets to our community, but I feel that<br />
changes are needed to their policies<br />
concerning how they treat creative<br />
employees in developing and protecting<br />
‘our’ intellectual assets that are now<br />
being squandered on a grand scale.”<br />
The problem is that some employers<br />
suppress for years - or even decades -<br />
development of inventions that don’t fit<br />
company business plans, he said.<br />
Instead, employers should “return clear<br />
title” to employee inventions within a