17.08.2013 Views

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 TH <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium<br />

DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, &<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY<br />

OCTOBER 12 & 13, <strong>2012</strong>


Welcome<br />

The <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium is a biennial event held since<br />

1979 that brings together leading researchers in both academic fields and<br />

cutting-­‐edge biotechnology enterprises for two days <strong>of</strong> stimulating talks<br />

and interaction between members <strong>of</strong> our local scientific community.<br />

The symposium is entirely student-­‐organized, and as such, all the<br />

planning and fundraising is conducted solely by graduate students. We<br />

are delighted to announce the 26th <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium<br />

on Translational Science and Medicine. The symposium will be held on<br />

October 12-­‐13, <strong>2012</strong> at the new Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology<br />

Building at CU-­‐<strong>Boulder</strong>. It will begin with a keynote speaker and reception<br />

on Friday evening, followed by several sessions on Saturday. We are<br />

delighted that you will be participating during this enjoyable weekend <strong>of</strong><br />

science and discussion.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium Committee<br />

Carolina Daez, Kent Riemondy and Tess Shideler


Past <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposia<br />

1979 Membranes<br />

1980 Cell Motility<br />

1981 The Accuracy <strong>of</strong> Biological Processes<br />

1983 Evolution: Shaping Molecules, Microbes, and Complex<br />

Organisms<br />

1984 Contemporary Research in Plant <strong>Biology</strong><br />

1985 The Role <strong>of</strong> Complex Carbohydrates in Cellular Function<br />

1987 Sex Determination<br />

1989 Pathogen Strategies: Evasion and Suppression <strong>of</strong> the Immune<br />

System<br />

1990 Life at the Edge: From Prebiotic Chemistry to<br />

Extraterrestrial <strong>Biology</strong><br />

1991 Zen and the Art <strong>of</strong> Cell Cycle Maintenance<br />

1992 Evolution from the inside<br />

1993 The Self-­‐Wiring Machine: Development and Functional Organ<br />

Systems<br />

1994 The Human Genome<br />

1995 Self vs. Non-­‐Self: Modes <strong>of</strong> Organismal Recognition<br />

1996 Pattern and Polarity: Establishing Difference in Development<br />

1997 Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression: Beyond the<br />

Double Helix<br />

1998 The Molecular Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> Cellular Motility<br />

1999 <strong>Program</strong>med Cell Death: Making a Graceful Exit<br />

2000 Astrobiology: Life in the Universe<br />

2002 Genomics and Beyond: DNA tells all?<br />

2004 Cancer <strong>Biology</strong><br />

2006 Stem Cell <strong>Biology</strong><br />

2008 Infectious Disease and Host-­‐Pathogen Interactions<br />

2010 Neuroscience


Agenda<br />

Friday, October 12, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Time Location Event<br />

4.00-­‐5.00 pm Butcher Atrium Registration<br />

5.00-­‐5.10 pm Butcher Auditorium Welcome<br />

5.10-­‐6.10 pm Butcher Auditorium Keynote: Bill Freytag<br />

6.10-­‐6.55 pm Butcher Auditorium Jennifer Leeds<br />

6.55-­‐9.00 pm Butcher Atrium Dinner & Reception<br />

Saturday, October 13, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Time Location Event<br />

8.00-­‐9.00 am Butcher Atrium Breakfast and late<br />

Registration<br />

9.00-­‐9.30 am Butcher Auditorium Keynote: Larry Gold<br />

9.30-­‐10.15 am Butcher Auditorium Michael Yaffe<br />

10.15-­‐10.35 am Butcher Atrium C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

10.35-­‐11:20 am Butcher Auditorium William Marshall<br />

11.20-­‐12.05 pm Butcher Auditorium Stephen A. Williams<br />

12:05-­‐1.15 pm Butcher Atrium Lunch and Vendor<br />

Exhibition<br />

1.15-­‐2.00 pm Butcher Auditorium JoAnne Flynn<br />

2.00-­‐2.45 pm Butcher Auditorium John T. Schiller<br />

2.45-­‐3.15 pm Butcher Atrium C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

3.15-­‐4.00 pm Butcher Auditorium Jeffrey Settleman<br />

4.00-­‐4.45 pm Butcher Auditorium Peter Jackson<br />

4.45-­‐5.30 pm Butcher Auditorium William Sullivan<br />

5.30-­‐7.00 pm Butcher Atrium Reception


Keynote Speaker:<br />

William Freytag, PhD<br />

Former Chairman and CEO, Myogen,<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong>, CO<br />

Title: Fifteen Years and $1.3 Billion Later<br />

Friday, October 12<br />

5:10 – 6:10 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

It is the mission <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical research companies to take the path from understanding a<br />

disease to bringing a safe and effective new treatment to patients. Scientists work to piece<br />

together the basic causes <strong>of</strong> disease at the level <strong>of</strong> genes, proteins and cells. Out <strong>of</strong> this<br />

understanding emerge “targets”, which potential new drugs might be able to<br />

affect. Researchers work to: (i) validate these targets, (ii) discover molecules (potential drug)<br />

that interact with the chosen target, (iii) test these new compounds in the lab and clinic for<br />

safety and efficacy, and (iv) gain regulatory approval and get the drug into the hands <strong>of</strong><br />

doctors and patients. This whole process typically takes 10-­‐15 years and an expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />

$1.3 billion.


Jennifer Leeds, PhD<br />

Executive Director-­‐ Antibacterial Discovery<br />

Infectious Diseases Area<br />

Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research<br />

Title: Discovery and development <strong>of</strong> LFF571, a<br />

novel antibacterial for the treatment <strong>of</strong> C.<br />

difficile infection.<br />

Friday, October 12<br />

6.10-­‐6.55 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Antibiotics are among the most important advances in the history <strong>of</strong> modern medicine.<br />

Antibiotics transform deadly bacterial infections into curable diseases, and enable surgical and<br />

medical innovation in nearly every therapeutic area. However, the increasing use <strong>of</strong><br />

antibiotics has contributed to the rise in drug resistant and multi-­‐drug resistant pathogens<br />

both in the community and in the hospital setting. At the same time, the number <strong>of</strong> new<br />

agents to treat bacterial infections is diminishing, partly due to the difficulty in identifying ideal<br />

targets and chemical starting points as well as increasing challenges in treating patients with<br />

complex medical needs. New agents should be potent against organisms exhibiting clinically-­‐<br />

relevant drug resistant phenotypes. The discovery <strong>of</strong> new chemical entities targeting<br />

unexploited mechanisms <strong>of</strong> growth inhibition is one strategy to address this hurdle. This was<br />

the origin <strong>of</strong> the drug discovery program that led us to discover LFF571. LFF571 is a new<br />

chemical entity that is currently being evaluated for safety and efficacy in patients with<br />

Clostridium difficile infection. The discovery and early development program for this novel<br />

compound will be presented.


Keynote Speaker:<br />

Larry Gold, PhD<br />

Chairman, Founder, and CEO <strong>of</strong> SomaLogic<br />

Founder <strong>of</strong> NeXstar and Synergen<br />

Title: Empowering Students: The Good and<br />

the Ugly<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

9:00 – 9:30 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

In 1973 or thereabouts Charlie Yegian died <strong>of</strong> leukemia. Charlie was a young pr<strong>of</strong>essor in<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B, he was my friend, and I missed him immediately and still miss him. He was a great<br />

teacheer. Jane Westlye and I arranged a Symposium to honor Charlie. It was a great<br />

Symposium. One <strong>of</strong> the speakers said about Charlie that "when he did an experiment it stayed<br />

done." There is no higher accolade for a scientist.<br />

I then had an idea, which was simple. We could continue to have Symposia like the one we<br />

had to honor Charlie, and I could help the students raise money (my specialty, apparently) and<br />

they could do the work and share the learning that came with putting on a science<br />

symposium. We have had great student-­‐driven symposia and some that were just OK -­‐ that is<br />

as it should be. We always have had good people come to speak. The tension (The Good and<br />

the Ugly") is built into the activity, and it has to be there. Students are young, and they have<br />

ideas that are, say, in progress -­‐ that has to be there. Students posture, unlike faculty, who<br />

never posture.


Michael B. Yaffe, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology (MIT)<br />

Title: Systems <strong>Biology</strong> Approaches to<br />

Optimizing Cancer Treatment<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

9:20 – 10:15 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Most current anti-­‐cancer drugs function by one <strong>of</strong> two general mechanisms: (1) targeting specific signaling<br />

molecules, particularly protein kinases and growth factor receptors; and (2) inducing cytotoxicity through DNA<br />

damage or disruption <strong>of</strong> the mitotic spindle. Targeted agents/signaling inhibitors, when used as<br />

monotherapies for cancer treatment are non-­‐curative. Although these drugs can induce dramatic tumor<br />

regression, and occasionally prolonged remissions, the cancers invariably recur. Alternatively, cytotoxic<br />

therapies that damage DNA have a long history <strong>of</strong> successful use as anti-­‐neoplastic agents. However, patient<br />

responses to DNA damaging drugs vary greatly, and heterogeneity within any single tumor can lead to the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> a resistant sub-­‐population <strong>of</strong> cells. The DNA damage from exposure <strong>of</strong> tumor cells to these<br />

cytotoxic agents is processed by a complex interacting network <strong>of</strong> signaling pathways involving protein<br />

kinases, phosphoserine/ threonine-­‐binding domains (14-­‐3-­‐3 proteins, FHA domains, BRCT domains), and<br />

ubiquitin/SUMO modifying enzymes. The outputs <strong>of</strong> these DNA damage-­‐activated pathways must be<br />

integrated with additional extracellular and intracellular cues such as cytokines and growth factor signals to<br />

control the resulting cellular response – cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis or senescence. How this array<br />

<strong>of</strong> diverse signals is functionally integrated and processed, and how these signal integration events can be<br />

influenced by combinations <strong>of</strong> anti-­‐cancer therapies to enhance tumor cell killing is unknown.<br />

To address this, we have been developing systems biology-­‐based models <strong>of</strong> DNA damage signaling<br />

where gene expression signatures, kinase activities, protein phosphorylation, and phosphoprotein-­‐binding<br />

events for multiple signaling pathways are quantitatively measured at densely sampled points in time, along<br />

with cellular responses such as cell cycle arrest, autophagy, and apoptosis. The resulting large dataset <strong>of</strong><br />

signals and responses are then related to each other mathematically using partial least squares regression,<br />

principal components analysis, and time-­‐interval stepwise regression. We have used this approach to examine<br />

the response <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and osteosarcoma cells to DNA damaging chemotherapy and gamma radiation<br />

in the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> small molecule inhibitors <strong>of</strong> growth factor signaling pathways. The resulting<br />

models, built from thousands <strong>of</strong> signaling measurements and hundreds <strong>of</strong> cellular response assays, reveals<br />

surprisingly paradoxical context-­‐dependent roles for the MEK-­‐Erk and p38/MK2 kinase signaling pathways in<br />

controlling cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and senescence after DNA damage. Using this approach, we recently<br />

identified a novel time-­‐staggered combination therapy in which EGFR inhibitor pre-­‐treatment is used to<br />

dramatically enhance DNA damage-­‐induced cell death in a subset <strong>of</strong> triple-­‐negative breast cancers by dynamic<br />

re-­‐wiring <strong>of</strong> apoptosis pathways. The results from these systems-­‐based studies illustrate the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

measuring time-­‐dependent changes in signaling pathways in evaluating and optimizing the effects <strong>of</strong> anti-­‐<br />

cancer drugs, and show the utility <strong>of</strong> a new concept – therapeutic network re-­‐wiring – in designing novel<br />

combination therapies with greater anti-­‐tumor efficacy.


William S. Marshall, PhD<br />

President and Chief Executive Officer<br />

miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.<br />

Title: microRNA targeting as a novel approach<br />

to the development <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular<br />

therapeutics<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

10:35 – 11:20 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Alterations in the expression <strong>of</strong> specific microRNAs have been observed in several<br />

cardiovascular disease models and human clinical samples, providing an exciting potential for<br />

therapeutic intervention. Genetic deletion studies that have been recapitulated by synthetic<br />

antimiR dosing studies demonstrated that the inhibition <strong>of</strong> certain microRNA’s is sufficient to<br />

produce beneficial outcomes in relevant disease models. Targeting such microRNAs with<br />

short, high-­‐affinity oligonucleotides has demonstrated significant promise, as this strategy<br />

benefits from the altered biophysical properties <strong>of</strong> the antimiR compared to traditional<br />

antisense or RNAi gene targeting approaches. These characteristics contribute to enhanced<br />

pharmaceutical properties <strong>of</strong> the antimiR. An overview <strong>of</strong> our lead programs will highlight<br />

several key pharmacological observations that help build confidence in the lead molecules as<br />

they advance towards human clinical evaluation.


Steven A. Williams, PhD<br />

Chief Medical Officer<br />

SomaLogic<br />

Title: The Voices <strong>of</strong> Life; Discovery <strong>of</strong> Protein<br />

Patterns in Health and Disease Using<br />

SOMAmers<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

11:20 – 12:05 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Despite the exciting promises being made about personalized medicine enabled by genetic<br />

testing, it is an impossible task. This is because the environment is not genetic, and yet has a<br />

big (or perhaps I should say "supersize") influence on health and disease, and because outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cancer our genetics don't significantly change from the time when we are babies to the<br />

day we die. The ideal health measurement would be <strong>of</strong> low cost and would respond to both<br />

environment and changes in health status. Proteins -­‐ as the downstream product <strong>of</strong> genetics<br />

and environment -­‐ have the right characteristics but the available technologies have not been<br />

up to the task <strong>of</strong> measuring thousands <strong>of</strong> them across a difference in abundance from the<br />

lowest to the highest <strong>of</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> billions to one. A new type <strong>of</strong> reagent will be described -­‐ the<br />

SOMAmer -­‐ which has enabled us to overcome these issues, and which has driven<br />

unprecedented discoveries. Examples will be shown from the early detection <strong>of</strong> cancer!<br />

to cardiovascular disease, and how individual tests can be bundled together to enable the<br />

"wellness chip", with the intention <strong>of</strong> lowering the cost <strong>of</strong> healthcare and improving health<br />

outcomes.


JoAnne Flynn, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Microbiology and<br />

Molecular Genetics<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh School <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

Title: Tuberculosis: Seeing is Believing<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

1:15 – 2:00 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Tuberculosis is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Humans infected with this bacillus can<br />

present with active TB (symptomatic) or clinically latent (asymptomatic) infection. The factors<br />

that determine the outcome <strong>of</strong> infection are not fully understood. Active TB can present in a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> ways, from mild to fulminant disease. Recently, we have proposed that latent<br />

infection also represents a spectrum <strong>of</strong> infections, and those that are “higher” on the<br />

spectrum <strong>of</strong> latency are more likely to develop reactivation TB. Using a non-­‐human primate<br />

model <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis, we have assessed the factors and events that influence outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

infection, and have used sophisticated whole-­‐body imaging to track the infection. Our findings<br />

indicate that the spectrum <strong>of</strong> M. tuberculosis infection that exists in the population can also<br />

exist in a single host. Using imaging, immunology, bacteriology and modeling, we have data to<br />

demonstrate the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> infection within a single host at the level <strong>of</strong> the granuloma.<br />

Data on the variability in granulomas will be presented. This variability has implications for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> drugs to effectively and efficiently treat tuberculosis, as well as vaccines to<br />

prevent infection or disease.


John T. Schiller, PhD<br />

Head, Neoplastic Disease Section<br />

Deputy Laboratory Chief<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Cellular Oncology<br />

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.<br />

Title: Understanding and Learning from the<br />

Success <strong>of</strong> Human Papillomavirus Prophylactic<br />

Vaccines<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

2:00 – 2:45 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial vaccines is undoubtedly one <strong>of</strong> the greatest triumphs <strong>of</strong><br />

biomedical research. Given the extraordinary effectiveness <strong>of</strong> vaccines against a wide array <strong>of</strong><br />

bacterial and viral pathogens, the failure to develop effective vaccines against the most<br />

common sexually transmitted infections, especially HIV, has been both surprising and<br />

frustrating. The only notable exception is the development <strong>of</strong> prophylactic vaccines against<br />

genital human papillomaviruses (HPVs), the primary etiologic agents in an estimated 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

human cancers, most importantly cervical cancer. In recently concluded clinical trials, the<br />

vaccines were safe and very effective at preventing sexually transmitted infection and the<br />

neoplastic diseases induced by the HPV types targeted by the vaccines. They are now licensed<br />

in many countries worldwide for the prevention <strong>of</strong> cervical and other HPV-­‐associated cancers<br />

and various other hyperproliferative diseases. It is therefore interesting to examine why the<br />

HPV vaccines have succeeded whereas those targeting other sexually transmitted infections<br />

(STIs) have failed. In this seminar, I will briefly review the association <strong>of</strong> HPVs with human<br />

cancer and other neoplastic diseases, describe the composition <strong>of</strong> the two commercial<br />

vaccines and summarize their efficacy in clinical trials and their emerging effectiveness in<br />

general vaccination programs. Specific aspects <strong>of</strong> HPV molecular biology and vaccine<br />

composition that likely contribute to their remarkable success will then be discussed. Finally, I<br />

will speculate on how the lessons learned from the HPV vaccines might influence the future <strong>of</strong><br />

vaccine development for other STIs, particularly HIV and herpes simplex.


Jeffrey Settleman, PhD<br />

Senior Director, Discovery Oncology<br />

Genentech<br />

Title: The Many Flavors <strong>of</strong> Resistance to<br />

Anti-­‐Cancer Drugs<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

3:15 – 4:00 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

The recent clinical success experienced with several “rationally-­‐targeted” anti-­‐cancer drugs, such as<br />

the kinase inhibitors imatinib, erlotinib, crizotinib, and vemurafenib, has defined a paradigm shift in<br />

cancer therapy. However, despite the sometimes impressive clinical activity associated with these<br />

agents, progression during therapy is inevitable due to the acquisition <strong>of</strong> drug resistance. For many<br />

drugs, specific genetic mechanisms <strong>of</strong> resistance have been elucidated, and pre-­‐clinical findings<br />

implicate additional non-­‐genetic mechanisms. Moreover, accumulating evidence implicates<br />

heterogeneity within cancer cell populations in the response to drug treatment, posing an additional<br />

challenge to the development <strong>of</strong> effective cancer therapeutics.<br />

While modeling the acute response to various anti-­‐cancer agents in drug-­‐sensitive tumor cell lines, we<br />

consistently observed a small subpopulation <strong>of</strong> reversibly “drug-­‐tolerant” cells. This drug-­‐tolerant<br />

phenotype, associated with a distinct chromatin state, is transiently acquired and relinquished at low<br />

frequency by individual cells within the population, implicating the dynamic regulation <strong>of</strong> phenotypic<br />

heterogeneity in drug tolerance. The drug-­‐tolerant subpopulation can be selectively ablated by<br />

treatment with chromatin-­‐modifying agents, potentially yielding a therapeutic opportunity. These<br />

findings suggest that cancer cell populations employ an epigenetically-­‐regulated dynamic survival<br />

strategy in which individual cells transiently assume a reversibly drug-­‐tolerant state to protect the<br />

population from eradication by potentially lethal exposures.<br />

Cancer cells typically express multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that mediate signals that<br />

converge on common critical downstream cell survival effectors -­‐ most notably, phosphatidylinositol<br />

3-­‐kinase and mitogen-­‐activated protein kinase. Consequently, increased RTK ligand levels, via<br />

autocrine tumor cell production, paracrine contribution by tumor stroma, or systemic production,<br />

could confer resistance to inhibitors <strong>of</strong> an oncogenic kinase with a similar signaling output. Using a<br />

panel <strong>of</strong> kinase-­‐“addicted” cancer cell lines, we found that most cells can be “rescued” from drug<br />

sensitivity by simply exposing them to one or more RTK ligands. Among the findings with clinical<br />

implications was the observation that hepatocyte growth factor confers resistance to the BRAF<br />

inhibitor vemurafenib in BRAF mutant melanoma cells. These observations highlight the extensive<br />

redundancy <strong>of</strong> RTK-­‐transduced signalling in cancer cells and the potentially broad role <strong>of</strong> widely<br />

expressed RTK ligands in innate and acquired resistance to drugs targeting oncogenic kinases.


Peter Jackson, PhD<br />

Staff Scientist: Research Oncology<br />

Genentech<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

4:00 – 4:45 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Research Focus:<br />

My laboratory has worked on the biochemistry <strong>of</strong> the cell cycle, including DNA replication and<br />

mitosis. Much <strong>of</strong> our effort has gone toward understanding how proteolytic degradation by<br />

the ubiquitin proteasome system regulates the cell cycle.<br />

We have made key contributions to understanding how proteins that regulate the cell cycle,<br />

called cyclins, accumulate and are destroyed in vertebrate cells and in eggs. A central finding<br />

was our discovery <strong>of</strong> inhibitors <strong>of</strong> E3 ubiquitin ligases and their role in cell cycle control. We<br />

have identified several critical factors regulating cyclins and have linked their misregulation to<br />

cancer, proliferative disease and senescence. We continue to define important regulators in<br />

mitosis and in the ubiquitin pathway.<br />

Our recent work has also focused on signaling through the primary cilium. The primary cilium<br />

is an organelle with critical roles in signaling in tissues including the retina, nervous system,<br />

kidney and sensory organs. The importance <strong>of</strong> the cilia in signaling was only recently<br />

appreciated, but this structure organizes a still unknown number <strong>of</strong> receptor systems. These<br />

pathways are genetically linked to important degenerative diseases including renal cystic<br />

disease, obesity, diabetes, retinopathies and cancer signaling. We have used proteomic<br />

approaches to define regulatory networks linked to proteins that are defective in human<br />

diseases called ciliopathies. We are looking for critical receptor classes linked to these diseases<br />

and evaluating the therapeutic opportunities presented by these receptors


William Sullivan, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular, Cell &<br />

Developmental <strong>Biology</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> California, Santa Cruz (UCSC)<br />

Title: Wolbachia, African River Blindness, and<br />

Big Sur<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

4:45 – 5:30 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Wolbachia are obligate, intracellular, bacterial endosymbionts present in over 60% <strong>of</strong> all insect<br />

species. Manipulation <strong>of</strong> host reproduction and efficient maternal transmission have<br />

facilitated the global spread <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia in arthropods. Wolbachia are also present in filarial<br />

nematodes and are the leading cause <strong>of</strong> River Blindness and Elephantiasis. Our lab has<br />

focussed on the molecular and cellular interactions that mediate Wolbachia replication and<br />

transmission through insect and nematode germlines. Our studies demonstrate that efficient<br />

germline transmission <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia requires a developmentally coordinated association with<br />

plus and minus end motor proteins followed by a stable association in conserved germline<br />

determinants. In addition, Wolbachia manipulates host chromatin remodelers and the cell<br />

cycle to its advantage. Surveys <strong>of</strong> wild Drosophila populations reveals Wolbachia also stably<br />

populates host somatic lineages including the adult brain. Consequently we were able to<br />

generate stably Wolbachiainfected Drosophila cell lines. This facilitated high-­‐throughput cell-­‐<br />

based screens for small molecule compounds that specifically target Wolbachia. We descrbe<br />

the identification <strong>of</strong> Albendazole sulfone, an FDA approved metabolite <strong>of</strong> Albendazole, that<br />

specifically disrupts Wolbachia replication in Brugia malayi, the nematode associated with<br />

Elephantiasis and<br />

River Blindness.


Acknowledgements<br />

The <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium is a collaborative effort that would not<br />

be possible without the contributions <strong>of</strong> numerous individuals including<br />

undergraduate and graduate students, faculty and staff. Their dedication and<br />

enthusiasm has helped shape the engaging and collaborative environment found<br />

in the <strong>MCD</strong>B department.<br />

Special Thanks:<br />

Wendi Howard, Lee Gutmacher and Jaime Birren: Finance assistance<br />

Kathy Lozier: Travel arrangements and event logistics<br />

Karen Brown: Event logistics<br />

Laura Garret (SOFO): Budget coordination<br />

Erik Hedl and Alex Laszlo Bagi: Website design and registration databases<br />

Jessica Daez: Symposium logo design<br />

Vicky Romano and Lee Silbert: JSC Biotechnology venue coordination<br />

Ken Krauter: Graduate student mentor<br />

Elizabeth O'Connell (Front Range Catering Company): Catering and rentals<br />

In addition, special thanks to the numerous volunteers:<br />

Every two years, the graduate students in the <strong>MCD</strong>B department at the <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Colorado</strong>, <strong>Boulder</strong> organize a scientific symposium. We are delighted that an<br />

overwhelming number <strong>of</strong> undergraduate and graduate students have volunteered<br />

their time and talents to help with this year’s symposium. Students helped<br />

coordinate the entire event, including choosing this year’s topic, inviting speakers<br />

and helping with the logistical planning. The result is a day and a half <strong>of</strong><br />

stimulating talks and interaction between members <strong>of</strong> our scientific community.<br />

<strong>2012</strong> Graduate Student Symposium Organizing Committee:<br />

Carolina Daez (3rd year, Winey lab)<br />

Kent Riemondy (5th year, Yi Lab)<br />

Tess Shideler (6th year, Odorizzi lab)<br />

In memoriam:<br />

Dr. David M Prescott Distinguished Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus <strong>MCD</strong>B 1926-­‐2011<br />

Dr. Richard Ham Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus <strong>MCD</strong>B 1932-­‐2011


Symposium Location<br />

Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology Building<br />

Butcher Auditorium<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Colorado</strong>, <strong>Boulder</strong><br />

3415 <strong>Colorado</strong> Ave.,<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong> CO 80303<br />

Symposium Parking Map


<strong>2012</strong> PRESENTING SPONSORS


<strong>2012</strong> PRESENTING SPONSORS<br />

Arts and Science Student Government (ASSG)<br />

Center for the Integrative Study <strong>of</strong> Work in Living Systems,<br />

UCB<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Colleges and Schools (CCS)<br />

Student Group Funding Board (SGFB)<br />

Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs (VCSA)<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B Undergraduate Club<br />

NIH Institutional Training Grant<br />

"Creative Training in Molecular <strong>Biology</strong>" GM-07135<br />

The Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular, Cellular<br />

and Developmental <strong>Biology</strong>


Notes:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!