18.08.2013 Views

Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System

Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System

Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Eco-SSL values for trivalent chromium<br />

were derived for avian and mammalian<br />

wildlife. Eco-SSL values for hexavalent<br />

chromium were derived for mammalian<br />

wildlife. Data were insufficient to<br />

derive Eco-SSLs for plants or soil<br />

invertebrates. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSLs for<br />

trivalent chromium range from 26 mg/kg<br />

dry weight (dw) for birds to 34 mg/kg<br />

dw for mammals. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSL for<br />

hexavalent chromium for mammals is<br />

equal to 130 mg/kg dw. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSL<br />

values are lower than the 50 th percentile<br />

of reported background concentrations<br />

for both eastern and western U.S. soils<br />

(Figure 2.1). Background<br />

concentrations reported for many metals<br />

in U.S. soils are described in Attachment<br />

Conc (mg/kg dw)<br />

1-4 of the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003).<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

3.0 ECO-SSL FOR TERRESTRIAL PLANTS<br />

Eco-SSL for <strong>Chromium</strong> 3<br />

April 2008<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

East West<br />

Figure 2.1 Typical Background<br />

Concentrations of<br />

<strong>Chromium</strong> in U.S. Soils<br />

Of the papers identified from the literature search process, 150 were selected for acquisition for<br />

further review. Of those papers acquired, 11 met all 11 Study Acceptance Criteria (U.S. EPA,<br />

2003; Attachment 3-1). Each of these papers were reviewed and the studies were scored<br />

according to the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). Thirteen studies<br />

received an Evaluation Score greater than ten. <strong>The</strong>se studies are listed in Table 3.1. An Eco-<br />

SSL for terrestrial plants could not be calculated from these studies as the endpoints are not<br />

acceptable for Eco-SSL derivation (U.S. EPA, 2003). <strong>The</strong> endpoints are either unbounded<br />

values, or EC 50 values (concentration adversely affecting 50% of the test population) or values<br />

that could not be determined.<br />

4.0 ECO-SSL FOR SOIL INVERTEBRATES<br />

Maximum<br />

95th<br />

75th<br />

50th<br />

25th<br />

5th Percentile<br />

Of the papers identified from the literature search process, 31 were selected for acquisition for<br />

further review. Of those papers acquired, 4 met all 11 Study Acceptance Criteria (U.S. EPA,<br />

2003; Attachment 3-1). Each of these papers were reviewed and the studies were scored<br />

according to the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). Two studies received an<br />

Evaluation Score greater than ten. <strong>The</strong>se studies are listed in Table 4.1. <strong>The</strong>re are only two<br />

studies eligible for Eco-SSL derivation. At least three studies are required to derive an Eco-SSL<br />

for soil invertebrates (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). An Eco-SSL for soil invertebrates<br />

could not be calculated for chromium.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!