Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System
Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System
Chromium - The Risk Assessment Information System
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Eco-SSL values for trivalent chromium<br />
were derived for avian and mammalian<br />
wildlife. Eco-SSL values for hexavalent<br />
chromium were derived for mammalian<br />
wildlife. Data were insufficient to<br />
derive Eco-SSLs for plants or soil<br />
invertebrates. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSLs for<br />
trivalent chromium range from 26 mg/kg<br />
dry weight (dw) for birds to 34 mg/kg<br />
dw for mammals. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSL for<br />
hexavalent chromium for mammals is<br />
equal to 130 mg/kg dw. <strong>The</strong> Eco-SSL<br />
values are lower than the 50 th percentile<br />
of reported background concentrations<br />
for both eastern and western U.S. soils<br />
(Figure 2.1). Background<br />
concentrations reported for many metals<br />
in U.S. soils are described in Attachment<br />
Conc (mg/kg dw)<br />
1-4 of the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003).<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
3.0 ECO-SSL FOR TERRESTRIAL PLANTS<br />
Eco-SSL for <strong>Chromium</strong> 3<br />
April 2008<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
East West<br />
Figure 2.1 Typical Background<br />
Concentrations of<br />
<strong>Chromium</strong> in U.S. Soils<br />
Of the papers identified from the literature search process, 150 were selected for acquisition for<br />
further review. Of those papers acquired, 11 met all 11 Study Acceptance Criteria (U.S. EPA,<br />
2003; Attachment 3-1). Each of these papers were reviewed and the studies were scored<br />
according to the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). Thirteen studies<br />
received an Evaluation Score greater than ten. <strong>The</strong>se studies are listed in Table 3.1. An Eco-<br />
SSL for terrestrial plants could not be calculated from these studies as the endpoints are not<br />
acceptable for Eco-SSL derivation (U.S. EPA, 2003). <strong>The</strong> endpoints are either unbounded<br />
values, or EC 50 values (concentration adversely affecting 50% of the test population) or values<br />
that could not be determined.<br />
4.0 ECO-SSL FOR SOIL INVERTEBRATES<br />
Maximum<br />
95th<br />
75th<br />
50th<br />
25th<br />
5th Percentile<br />
Of the papers identified from the literature search process, 31 were selected for acquisition for<br />
further review. Of those papers acquired, 4 met all 11 Study Acceptance Criteria (U.S. EPA,<br />
2003; Attachment 3-1). Each of these papers were reviewed and the studies were scored<br />
according to the Eco-SSL guidance (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). Two studies received an<br />
Evaluation Score greater than ten. <strong>The</strong>se studies are listed in Table 4.1. <strong>The</strong>re are only two<br />
studies eligible for Eco-SSL derivation. At least three studies are required to derive an Eco-SSL<br />
for soil invertebrates (U.S. EPA, 2003; Attachment 3-2). An Eco-SSL for soil invertebrates<br />
could not be calculated for chromium.