Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden
Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden
Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Histogramme zu den Skalafragen<br />
The aim of the course was clear from the very<br />
beginning.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
54%<br />
31%<br />
15%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.6<br />
n = 13<br />
s = 0.8<br />
The instructor made sure that students understood<br />
the learning material<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
54%<br />
38%<br />
8%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.5<br />
n = 13<br />
s = 0.7<br />
The media incorporated in the course (board,<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>sparencies, presentations, ...) contributed to the<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
33% 33% 33%<br />
not at all<br />
n = 12<br />
mw = 2<br />
s = 0.9<br />
The instructor was able to <strong>an</strong>swer questions posed in<br />
class satisfactorily.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
71%<br />
29%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.3<br />
n = 14<br />
s = 0.5<br />
In general, the instructor offered adequate assist<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
<strong>an</strong>d support in regard to the learning of course<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
55%<br />
27%<br />
18%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.6<br />
n = 11<br />
s = 0.8<br />
By the end of the semester, the aim of the course<br />
had been achieved.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
36%<br />
21%<br />
43%<br />
Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens, Globalization, Integration <strong>an</strong>d International Org<strong>an</strong>izations<br />
14.07.2011 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 2.1<br />
n = 14<br />
s = 0.9<br />
The expl<strong>an</strong>ations provided by the instructor were<br />
comprehensible.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
57%<br />
29%<br />
14%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.6<br />
n = 14<br />
s = 0.8<br />
This part of the module is in line with the module as a<br />
whole.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
69%<br />
15% 15%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.5<br />
n = 13<br />
s = 0.8<br />
The requirements for earning a "Schein" were clearly<br />
stated.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
50%<br />
21%<br />
29%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.8<br />
n = 14<br />
The overall effectiveness of this course was<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
very high<br />
46%<br />
38%<br />
15%<br />
very low<br />
s = 0.9<br />
mw = 1.7<br />
n = 13<br />
s = 0.8<br />
Each session adequately made reference to the<br />
material covered in the last session.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
46%<br />
31%<br />
15%<br />
8%<br />
not at all<br />
mw = 1.8<br />
n = 13<br />
The instructor appeared to be well-prepared.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
73%<br />
27%<br />
not at all<br />
s = 1<br />
mw = 1.3<br />
n = 11<br />
The material of the course corresponds to the<br />
description of the module.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
54%<br />
31%<br />
15%<br />
not at all<br />
s = 0.5<br />
mw = 1.6<br />
n = 13<br />
s = 0.8<br />
There was sufficient opportunity to speak with the<br />
instructor during his or her office hours.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
completely<br />
58%<br />
17%<br />
25%<br />
not at all<br />
In general, I found the course to be<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
very good<br />
64%<br />
36%<br />
very bad<br />
mw = 1.7<br />
n = 12<br />
s = 0.9<br />
mw = 1.4<br />
n = 11<br />
s = 0.5
Change language