Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Universität Wuppertal - QSL - Gaußstraße 20- 42119 Wuppertal 

Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens (PERSÖNLICH) 

Bergische Universität Wuppertal 

Qualitätssicherung und Evaluation 

von Studium und Lehre 

Gaußstraße 20 

42119 Wuppertal 

Tel.: 0202 -439 -3095 

E-Mail: evaluation@uni-wuppertal.de 

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden 

Sehr geehrter Herr Prof. Dr. Welfens, 

Sie erhalten hier die Ergebnisse der automatisierten Auswertung der Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation 

zur Veranstaltung "Globalization, Integration and International Organizations" 

Fragebogen Typ VOR_E: 

Der zuerst angegebene Globalindikator setzt sich aus folgenden Skalen des Fragebogens 

zusammen: 

- Presentation of the learning material 

- Structure 

- Supervision / Support 

- Overall evaluation 

- Motivation 

- Personal data 

Als nächstes werden die einzelnen Mittelwerte der oben genannten Skalen aufgeführt. 

Im zweiten Teil des Auswertungsberichts werden die Mittelwerte aller einzelnen Fragen aufgelistet. 

Der Wert 1 kennzeichnet aus Sicht der Studierenden eine maximale Veranstaltungsgüte, der Wert 5 

eine minimale Veranstaltungsgüte. 

Diese Nachricht gilt gleichzeitig als Bescheinigung dafür, dass eine Lehrveranstaltungsbewertung für 

die o.g. Veranstaltung durchgeführt wurde. 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen 

Ihr QSL-Team

Globalwerte 

Globalindikator 

1. Presentation of the learning material 

2. Structure 

3. Supervision / Support 

4. Overall evaluation 

Legende 

Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens, Globalization, Integration and International Organizations 

Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens 

Globalization, Integration and International Organizations (M1208_11_346) 

Erfasste Fragebögen = 14 

Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen 

Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Mittelwert 

14.07.2011 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

1 2 3 4 5 

1 2 3 4 5 

1 2 3 4 5 

1 2 3 4 5 

1 2 3 4 5 

Fragetext Linker Pol 

25% 0% 50% 0% 25% 

Rechter Pol 

n=Anzahl 

mw=Mittelwert 

s=Std.-Abw. 

E.=Enthaltung 


1.1) 

1.2) 

1.3) 

1.4) 

1.5) 

1.6) 

The aim of the course was clear from the very 

beginning. 

By the end of the semester, the aim of the course 

had been achieved. 

Each session adequately made reference to the 

material covered in the last session. 

The instructor made sure that students understood 

the learning material 

The explanations provided by the instructor were 

comprehensible. 

The instructor appeared to be well-prepared. 

1 2 3 4 5 

Skala Histogramm 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

mw=1.6 

s=0.7 

mw=1.7 

s=0.8 

mw=1.5 

s=0.8 

mw=1.6 

s=0.8 

mw=1.5 

s=0.6 

53.8% 30.8% 15.4% 0% 0% 

completely not at all 

n=13 

mw=1.6 

s=0.8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

35.7% 21.4% 42.9% 0% 0% 


n=14 

mw=2.1 

s=0.9 

1 

2 

3 

4 

46.2% 30.8% 15.4% 7.7% 0% 


n=13 

mw=1.8 

s=1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

53.8% 38.5% 7.7% 0% 0% 


n=13 

mw=1.5 

s=0.7 

1 

2 

3 

4 

57.1% 28.6% 14.3% 0% 0% 


n=14 

mw=1.6 

s=0.8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

72.7% 27.3% 0% 0% 0% 


n=11 

mw=1.3 

s=0.5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5

1.7) 

The media incorporated in the course (board, 

transparencies, presentations, ...) contributed to the 

understanding of the learning material. 

2. Structure 

2.1) 

2.2) 

2.3) 

The course is part of a module. 

This part of the module is in line with the module as 

a whole. 

The material of the course corresponds to the 

description of the module. 


3.1) 

3.2) 

3.3) 

3.4) 

3.5) 

The instructor was able to answer questions posed 

in class satisfactorily. 

The requirements for earning a "Schein" were clearly 

stated. 

There was sufficient opportunity to speak with the 

instructor during his or her office hours. 

In general, the instructor offered adequate 

assistance and support in regard to the learning of 

course material. 

The instructor discriminates against certain students. 


4.1) 

4.2) 

The overall effectiveness of this course was 

In general, I found the course to be 


33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0% 0% 


n=12 

mw=2 

s=0.9 


1 

2 

3 

yes 100% 

no 0% 

4 

69.2% 15.4% 15.4% 0% 0% 


n=13 

mw=1.5 

s=0.8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

53.8% 30.8% 15.4% 0% 0% 


n=13 

mw=1.6 

s=0.8 

E.=1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

71.4% 28.6% 0% 0% 0% 


n=14 

mw=1.3 

s=0.5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

50% 21.4% 28.6% 0% 0% 


n=14 

mw=1.8 

s=0.9 

1 

2 

3 

4 

58.3% 16.7% 25% 0% 0% 


n=12 

mw=1.7 

s=0.9 

1 

2 

3 

4 

54.5% 27.3% 18.2% 0% 0% 


n=11 

mw=1.6 

s=0.8 

1 

2 

3 

yes 0% 

no 100% 

4 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

n=13 

n=12 

46.2% 38.5% 15.4% 0% 0% 

very high very low 

n=13 

mw=1.7 

s=0.8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

63.6% 36.4% 0% 0% 0% 

very good very bad 

n=11 

mw=1.4 

s=0.5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

5

4.3) 

4.4) 

The difficulty level of the material covered in this course was 

The pace at which the instructor covered course material was 

5. Time expenditure 

5.1) 

5.2) 

5.3) 

5.4) 

How often did you attend this course? 


too high 23.1% 

perfectly right 76.9% 

too low 0% 

too fast 7.7% 

perfectly right 92.3% 

too slow 0% 

100%-80% 100% 

How much time did you spend per week in order to prepare for this course (not taking into account the actual time spent in the 

course or in preparation for your examinations)? 

I always prepared for the course adequately. 

I had no problems finding time to follow up on the 

material covered in class. 

6. Motivation 

6.1) 

I took this course (you may give several reasons)… 

7. Personal data 

7.1) 

Please state your gender 

up to 1h 14.3% 

up to 2h 35.7% 

up to 3h 21.4% 

up to 4h 14.3% 

up to 5h 14.3% 

0% 55.6% 44.4% 0% 0% 


n=9 

mw=2.4 

s=0.5 


1 

2 

3 

4 

0% 50% 37.5% 12.5% 0% 


n=8 

mw=2.6 

s=0.7 

1 

... because I am interested in the topic 64.3% 

... because of the instructor 28.6% 

... because the course was required 42.9% 

... in order to prepare for an examination 28.6% 

2 

3 

male 50% 

female 50% 

4 

5 

5 

n=13 

n=13 

n=14 

n=14 

n=14 

n=10

7.2) 

Which “Fachsemester” are you currently in? 


1st/2nd 85.7% 

5th/6th 7.1% 

7th / 8th 7.1% 


n=14

Histogramme zu den Skalafragen 

The aim of the course was clear from the very 

beginning. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

54% 

31% 

15% 

not at all 

mw = 1.6 

n = 13 

s = 0.8 

The instructor made sure that students understood 

the learning material 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

54% 

38% 

8% 

not at all 

mw = 1.5 

n = 13 

s = 0.7 

The media incorporated in the course (board, 

transparencies, presentations, ...) contributed to the 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

33% 33% 33% 

not at all 

n = 12 

mw = 2 

s = 0.9 

The instructor was able to answer questions posed in 

class satisfactorily. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

71% 

29% 

not at all 

mw = 1.3 

n = 14 

s = 0.5 

In general, the instructor offered adequate assistance 

and support in regard to the learning of course 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

55% 

27% 

18% 

not at all 

mw = 1.6 

n = 11 

s = 0.8 

By the end of the semester, the aim of the course 

had been achieved. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

36% 

21% 

43% 



not at all 

mw = 2.1 

n = 14 

s = 0.9 

The explanations provided by the instructor were 

comprehensible. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

57% 

29% 

14% 

not at all 

mw = 1.6 

n = 14 

s = 0.8 

This part of the module is in line with the module as a 

whole. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

69% 

15% 15% 

not at all 

mw = 1.5 

n = 13 

s = 0.8 

The requirements for earning a "Schein" were clearly 

stated. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

50% 

21% 

29% 

not at all 

mw = 1.8 

n = 14 

The overall effectiveness of this course was 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

very high 

46% 

38% 

15% 

very low 

s = 0.9 

mw = 1.7 

n = 13 

s = 0.8 

Each session adequately made reference to the 

material covered in the last session. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

46% 

31% 

15% 

8% 

not at all 

mw = 1.8 

n = 13 

The instructor appeared to be well-prepared. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

73% 

27% 

not at all 

s = 1 

mw = 1.3 

n = 11 

The material of the course corresponds to the 

description of the module. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

54% 

31% 

15% 

not at all 

s = 0.5 

mw = 1.6 

n = 13 

s = 0.8 

There was sufficient opportunity to speak with the 

instructor during his or her office hours. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

58% 

17% 

25% 

not at all 

In general, I found the course to be 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

very good 

64% 

36% 

very bad 

mw = 1.7 

n = 12 

s = 0.9 

mw = 1.4 

n = 11 

s = 0.5

I always prepared for the course adequately. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

56% 

44% 

not at all 

mw = 2.4 

n = 9 

s = 0.5 

I had no problems finding time to follow up on the 

material covered in class. 

100% 

75% 

50% 

25% 

completely 

50% 

38% 

13% 



not at all 

mw = 2.6 

n = 8 

s = 0.7

Teilbereich: FB B - Wirtschaftswissenschaft 

Name der/des Lehrenden: Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens 

Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: 

(Name der Umfrage) 

Profillinie 



1.1) The aim of the course was clear from the very beginning. completely not at all 

1.2) By the end of the semester, the aim of the course had been achieved. completely not at all 

1.3) Each session adequately made reference to the material covered in the last 

session. 


1.4) The instructor made sure that students understood the learning material completely not at all 

1.5) The explanations provided by the instructor were comprehensible. completely not at all 

1.6) The instructor appeared to be well-prepared. completely not at all 

1.7) The media incorporated in the course (board, transparencies, 

presentations, ...) contributed to the understanding of the learning material. 


2.2) This part of the module is in line with the module as a whole. completely not at all 

2.3) The material of the course corresponds to the description of the module. completely not at all 

3.1) The instructor was able to answer questions posed in class satisfactorily. completely not at all 

3.2) The requirements for earning a "Schein" were clearly stated. completely not at all 

3.3) There was sufficient opportunity to speak with the instructor during his or her 

office hours. 

3.4) In general, the instructor offered adequate assistance and support in regard to 

the learning of course material. 



4.1) The overall effectiveness of this course was very high very low 

4.2) In general, I found the course to be very good very bad 

5.3) I always prepared for the course adequately. completely not at all 

5.4) I had no problems finding time to follow up on the material covered in class. completely not at all 


n=13 

mw=1.6 

n=14 

mw=2.1 

n=13 

mw=1.8 

n=13 

mw=1.5 

n=14 

mw=1.6 

n=11 

mw=1.3 

n=12 

mw=2 

n=13 

mw=1.5 

n=13 

mw=1.6 

n=14 

mw=1.3 

n=14 

mw=1.8 

n=12 

mw=1.7 

n=11 

mw=1.6 

n=13 

mw=1.7 

n=11 

mw=1.4 

n=9 

mw=2.4 

n=8 

mw=2.6

Präsentationsvorlage 



Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens 

Erfasste Fragebögen = 14 



+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

1 2 3 4 5 

2. Structure 

1 2 3 4 5 


1 2 3 4 5 


1 2 3 4 5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

mw=1.7 

mw=1.5 

mw=1.6 

mw=1.5

8. Further questions 

8.1) 

8.2) 

Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen 

Are there any other courses that cover the same material? Did you find this positive or negative? 

What did you particularly like about this course? Why? 


14.07.2011 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9

8.3) 


What did you particularly dislike about this course? Why? What can be improved in the future in this regard?

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?