23.08.2013 Views

Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program

Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program

Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Trends in water quality and quantity<br />

Water quality in rivers is largely a function of land use and catchment geology as well<br />

as in-stream processes. A wide range of human-related inputs to river systems can<br />

affect in-stream processes and can be detected by using water quality analyses. For<br />

example, high nutrient levels can stimulate algal blooms and toxic chemicals can<br />

severely affect aquatic plant and animal communities.<br />

One of the limitations of water quality sampling and analysis in the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>-<br />

<strong>Nepean</strong> is that it is generally undertaken monthly, so that short-term changes may<br />

not be easily detected without further additional investigation. It also means that it<br />

may take some time (years) before trends in water quality become evident in the<br />

routine monitoring program. Water quality sampling also focuses on only a subset of<br />

indicators, as it is both impractical and prohibitively expensive to test for all known<br />

chemical compounds that could be detrimental to river health. Appropriate water<br />

quality indicators are extensively discussed in the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)<br />

Guidelines (particularly Volume 2, Section 8.2) and the indicators used in the<br />

<strong>Hawkesbury</strong>- <strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> <strong>Program</strong> are considered to be an appropriate<br />

subset of water quality indicators to monitor. More specialised programs are required<br />

where specific contaminants are the primary focus of concern (e.g.<br />

pesticides/herbicides or endocrine disruptors).<br />

Longitudinal trends in water quality<br />

Sites that have been extensively sampled in the past for water quality are identified in<br />

Figure 5.1. Figure 5.2 illustrates the changes in various analytes as you move from<br />

the bases of the dams downstream to the mouth of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong> <strong>River</strong> at Broken<br />

Bay. These figures include historic data from a more extensive network of sites than<br />

is being monitored or identified for monitoring in the current <strong>Program</strong>. They also<br />

contain a number of tributary sites that are likely to be unrepresentative of water<br />

quality in the main channel of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>-<strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>River</strong>. Despite this, they are<br />

useful in identifying specific tributaries (e.g. South Creek, Rickaby’s Creek, Grose<br />

<strong>River</strong>) where water quality is significantly different from that in the main stem of the<br />

river and can contribute (both negatively and positively) to overall water quality and<br />

ecosystem health in the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>-<strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>River</strong> system. The figures are based<br />

on long-term medians, and the data file from which these graphs have been<br />

produced is included in Table A1.2 (Appendix 1). Recent changes (e.g. nutrient<br />

reductions at STPs) are likely to reduce some of the highest spikes, and this can be<br />

seen in the gradual decreases in the time series of nutrient concentrations at many of<br />

these sites (See Water quality trends using statistical models below).<br />

10 <strong>Hawkesbury</strong> <strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: Final Technical Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!