24.08.2013 Views

St. Johns/New Madrid RSEIS - Endangered Species & Wetlands ...

St. Johns/New Madrid RSEIS - Endangered Species & Wetlands ...

St. Johns/New Madrid RSEIS - Endangered Species & Wetlands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

permanent waterbody HSI gained for every acre of mitigation, since lands are inundated<br />

continuously, including the April 1 to May 15 timeframe (i.e., duration equals 100%).<br />

Comments received by the Corps since the 2002 <strong>RSEIS</strong> express the opinion that the<br />

proposed reforested mitigation tracts will generally be flooded only about a third (33%)<br />

of the mid-season period, or for 15 days. However, it is clear that site-specific analyses<br />

once tracts are acquired and on-site mitigation techniques are employed are needed to<br />

determine actual inundation duration. However, if that general assumption of 33%<br />

duration were used for planning purposes and mitigation was based solely on<br />

reforestation, three times the amount of mitigation proposed in the 2002 <strong>RSEIS</strong> would be<br />

required, plus the additional mitigation necessary to account for the transition period.<br />

Reforesting cropland with bottomland hardwoods, in particular with 70% red oaks, is not<br />

always feasible if the land is flooded for long periods during the growing season. The<br />

flooding could cause excessive mortality of the trees. Tree species for specific mitigation<br />

sites would be selected during the development of site-specific mitigation plans with<br />

input from the interagency mitigation team.<br />

2.3.4 Compensatory Mitigation Calculation<br />

Determining unavoidable fish and wildlife habitat impacts is based on HUs, as originally<br />

calculated in the 2002 <strong>RSEIS</strong>, and refined to AAHUs in this <strong>RSEIS</strong> 2. The goal of HEP<br />

is to determine the functional value of landscapes expressed as AAHUs. Impacts and<br />

mitigation are enumerated as AAHUs, and the difference between pre- and post-project<br />

AAHUs is defined as the impact of the project. Therefore, mitigation must compensate<br />

for lost AAHUs, and the amount of mitigation required to fully compensate impacts<br />

depends on the techniques used and their associated habitat value (i.e., HSI value) in the<br />

mitigation plan. AAHUs, not ADFAs, are the key unit used to determine mitigation<br />

requirements. Benefits to mid-season fish rearing habitat from mitigation measures<br />

would be calculated by the following equations:<br />

Habitat Gains = AAHUs per tract with mitigation – AAHUs per tract without mitigation<br />

Where AAHUs are calculated by (50-year project life),<br />

AAHUs = Cumulative HUs/50 years<br />

and Cumulative HUs are calculated by,<br />

⎡ HSI + HSI2<br />

⎤<br />

Cumulative HUs = Σ [(T2 – T1) * (ADFA) * ⎢<br />

⎣ 2 ⎥<br />

⎦<br />

where<br />

Draft <strong>RSEIS</strong> 2<br />

24<br />

1 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!