Resolutions booklet in English - European Youth Parliament
Resolutions booklet in English - European Youth Parliament
Resolutions booklet in English - European Youth Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hels<strong>in</strong>ki, October - November 2009<br />
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY<br />
THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL MARKET AND<br />
CONSUMER PROTECTION I<br />
With concerns over <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g government control of Internet: how should<br />
<strong>European</strong> countries organise the governance of Internet <strong>in</strong> the future?<br />
Submitted by: Ioana Alistar (RO), Filip Bedka (PL), Florian Bodamer (AT), Raffaella Cecilia<br />
(IT), Başak Etk<strong>in</strong> (TR), Dmytro Grama (UA), Sophie Debrunner Hall (CH),<br />
Lucía Laorden Camacho (ES), Alexander Mondy (BE), Erik Müürsepp (EE),<br />
Eleni Polychroniadou (GR), Prestel Sokolo (FR), Yiannos Vakis (CY), Noah<br />
Walker-Crawford (DE), Tiago Correia Machado (Chairperson, PT)<br />
The <strong>European</strong> <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>,<br />
A. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account that the rapid growth of the Internet <strong>in</strong> content and <strong>in</strong> number of users<br />
– from 750 million <strong>in</strong> 2005 to over 1 billion <strong>in</strong> 2009 – renders Internet governance<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult,<br />
B. Acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g the variety of national eLegislations co-exist<strong>in</strong>g across Europe,<br />
C. Deeply concerned by the <strong>in</strong>crease of governmental censorship of Internet,<br />
D. Fully alarmed by the violation of human rights – such as access to <strong>in</strong>formation – due to<br />
circumstances of governmental censorship,<br />
E. Recognis<strong>in</strong>g the significance of various <strong>in</strong>stitutions deal<strong>in</strong>g with matters of Internet<br />
governance namely:<br />
i) the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),<br />
ii) the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN),<br />
iii) the <strong>European</strong> Network and Information Society Agency (ENISA),<br />
iv) the <strong>European</strong> Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG),<br />
F. View<strong>in</strong>g with appreciation the grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence of ICANN from the US Department<br />
of Commerce,<br />
G. Not<strong>in</strong>g the private ownership of web content to be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g thus creat<strong>in</strong>g obstacles to a<br />
comprehensive govern<strong>in</strong>g of the Internet,<br />
H. Alarmed by the Telecommunications Data Retention (TDR) legislation,<br />
I. Deeply concerned about the ownership of the personal <strong>in</strong>formation of the users by Internetbased<br />
companies – particularly social network<strong>in</strong>g sites,<br />
J. Concerned about the high <strong>in</strong>crease of cybercrime <strong>in</strong>ter alia data theft, spam, cyberfraud,<br />
viruses and hack<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
K. Not<strong>in</strong>g the difficulty of controll<strong>in</strong>g illegal onl<strong>in</strong>e content such as:<br />
a) child pornography,<br />
b) extreme violence,<br />
c) websites promot<strong>in</strong>g racism;