28.08.2013 Views

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.4 Effect of polarization and background material[P2] 27<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 4.6 Polarization-dependent discrete cloak designs and the associated objective<br />

values. The bottom panels depict the total fields while the top panels show the optimized<br />

material layouts as linear gray-scale plots, where white and black color correspond to<br />

ɛr =1andɛr = 2. The designs in panels (a) and (c) are optimized for Ez-polarization<br />

only whereas the deigns in panels (b) and (d) are optimized for Hz-polarization. Even<br />

though the cloaks (c) and (d) with ɛBG r = 2 only is required to operate for one polarization,<br />

significant scattering is generated.<br />

manufacturing defects. In this second study we vary the relative permittivity between<br />

ɛmin r =1andɛmax r = 2 in the cloak domain wrapped around the cylinder. The<br />

permittivity of the background material, ɛ BG<br />

r , (cf. figure 4.1) is either set to 1 or 2,<br />

depending on wether we are distributing dielectric material having a higher or lower<br />

permittivity than the background material, respectively. A symmetry constraint is<br />

imposed on the design with two symmetry lines around which the 4 equally sized<br />

sub-domains can be mirrored. That is, the optimized cloaks only work for two incoming<br />

wave angles. A min/max formulation for ΦE and ΦH is employed to make<br />

the cloak equally effective for both Ez and Hz polarization.<br />

Graded and discrete designs that minimize the scattering from both Ez and<br />

Hz polarization simultaneously are presented in figure 4.5 (top panels). The total<br />

fields for Ez and Hz polarization are shown in the middle and bottom panels, respec-<br />

tively. In case of ɛ BG<br />

r<br />

= 1 the graded design result in scattering less than 1% of the<br />

non-cloaked cylinder and even for the more restrictive case with a discrete design<br />

scattering is reduced to less than 5% for both polarizations. The Hz polarization for<br />

the discrete design yielding less scattering than the Ez polarization, due to the less<br />

restrictive boundary condition for the Hz polarization. Contrary to simple intuition,<br />

considerable scattering is produced <strong>by</strong> all designs with ɛBG r =2andgradeddesigns<br />

with ɛBG r = 2 produce more scattering than the discrete counter-parts. To analyze<br />

the cause for the degeneration in cloaking performance for designs with ɛBG r =2we<br />

relax the problem and investigate whether or not effective cloaks with ɛBG r =2can<br />

be designed individually for either the Ez or Hz polarization.<br />

Discrete design profiles optimized individually for either Ez or Hz polarization<br />

and the corresponding total fields are shown in figure 4.6. Even though we relax

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!