28.08.2013 Views

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

Backscattering cloak<br />

Encouraged <strong>by</strong> the results from the topology optimized cloaks reported in the previous<br />

chapter we looked for further ways to extend the cloak analysis. Here we<br />

relax the full cloaking problem <strong>by</strong> only requiring elimination of backscattering in<br />

a limited angular range. The less restricted case of cloaking enables us to concentrate<br />

our study to omnidirectional designs, based on concentric rings of isotropic,<br />

low-contrast, all-dielectric materials readily available in nature. Optimized annular<br />

cloaks have previously been proposed in the literature (cf. Ref. [105]), however the<br />

optimized anisotropic material properties are not easily realizable. Although relaxed<br />

compared to the full cloaking problem, backscattering cloaks are highly relevant in<br />

e.g. radar-setups where source and detector are coincident. The results presented<br />

here are examples of the findings given in [P4].<br />

With very little reformulation the optimization approach reported in the last<br />

chapter can easily be extended to the backscattering problem. However, the symmetry<br />

of omnidirectional ring design allows us to compute the electromagnetic field<br />

analytically[106, 107, 108]. Derivations of e.g. the far-field on an arc line is much<br />

faster using an analytic expression compared to a FEM solution and ring positions<br />

are not restricted to an underlying mesh. On the other hand the analytic expression<br />

can only be implemented in a sizing optimization of e.g. ring position and thickness<br />

there<strong>by</strong> loosing some of the design freedom provided <strong>by</strong> topology optimization.<br />

For the above reasons we choose a two step approach in order to benefit from the<br />

advantages of each method. First we use topology optimization to provide us with<br />

basic understanding of the optimized topology. Next a parametrization of the topology<br />

optimized designs is used in the optimization approach based on the analytic<br />

expression.<br />

5.1 <strong>Topology</strong> optimized backscattering designs<br />

The setup for the topology optimization problem is almost identical to the one outlined<br />

in the previous chapter. Here we minimize the norm of the Ez polarized scattered<br />

field in a circular trapezoidal domain enclosed at ± 10 o from the backscattering<br />

direction and with inner and outer radii given as 1.75 and 5 free space wavelengths<br />

from the obstacle, respectively (see Ωout in Fig. 5.1(a)). The permittivity is allowed<br />

to vary between ɛmin r =1andɛmax r = 2 with free space being the background material.<br />

The results of the optimization process are surprisingly simple annular Bragglike<br />

grating structures with layer dimensions that depend on the obstacle radius<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!