Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics
Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics
Wave Manipulation by Topology Optimization - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.5 <strong>Topology</strong> optimized acoustic cloaks [P3] 29<br />
(b)<br />
(a)<br />
Objective, Φ<br />
(c) (d)<br />
(a)<br />
(c)<br />
(b)<br />
(e)<br />
Iterations<br />
Figure 4.8 A three-step MMOS based optimization approach for acoustic cloak design<br />
with cylindrical aluminum inclusions in air. (a): The design is initialized using 306 aluminum<br />
cylinders. (b): Optimized design where the cylinders can change in size and<br />
position. (c): Cylinders with a radius smaller than 0.25 cm are discarded. (d): Optimized<br />
design with a lower bound on the radii. (e) Radii of all cylinders are rounded off to 0.5<br />
cm, 1.0 cm or 1.5 cm. (f): Final design after reoptimizing the positions of the cylinders.<br />
neous and anisotropic mass density, which is not common in naturally occurring<br />
fluids, thus making realizations very challenging. Equivalent to the electromagnetic<br />
carpet cloak approach the acoustic problem can also be relaxed to that of hiding<br />
objects on a reflecting surface[98] and a recent realization for airborne sound has<br />
been reported[99]. A fully enclosing acoustic cloak for underwater ultrasound has<br />
also been realized [100] based on an acoustic transmission line approach. As such<br />
most of the reported work are concentrated on realizing the anisotropic material<br />
parameters with engineered acoustic metamaterials[101, 102, 103]. However, our<br />
goal in this problem is with a limited reformulation to use the initial methodology<br />
of designing optical cloaks to design an acoustic cloak with isotropic material properties<br />
to circumvent the problems of the anisotropic mass density.<br />
For the acoustic case air and solid material (aluminum) are redistributed in the<br />
cloak domain in order to minimize the norm of the scattered pressure field (p s ↔ E s z<br />
in equation (6.2)) in the surrounding domain, Ωout. In the electromagnetic cloak<br />
only one of the material properties (ɛr) is varied, whereas in the acoustic case both<br />
density, ρ, and bulk modulus, κ are redistributed in the design process. Here the<br />
inverse material properties are interpolated linearly.<br />
(d)<br />
(f)<br />
(e)<br />
(f)