29.08.2013 Views

Copyright by Jeffrey C. Rutherford 2007 - University of Texas ...

Copyright by Jeffrey C. Rutherford 2007 - University of Texas ...

Copyright by Jeffrey C. Rutherford 2007 - University of Texas ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elatively equal, the use <strong>of</strong> letters written <strong>by</strong> members <strong>of</strong> these additional divisions should<br />

provides a strong supplement to understanding the mentalities <strong>of</strong> the infantrymen under<br />

investigation.<br />

A soldier’s mentality was molded <strong>by</strong> his Heimat’s long-term cultural and social<br />

influences – the religious, class, and political traditions – as well as <strong>by</strong> the more<br />

immediate experiences <strong>of</strong> the 1920s and 1930s. The differing historical and cultural<br />

backgrounds <strong>of</strong> East Prussia, Berlin-Brandenburg and Rhineland-Westphalia were bound<br />

to produce differences in how these soldiers responded to and viewed the war in the<br />

Soviet Union. One way to examine these differences is using the methodological tools <strong>of</strong><br />

Alltagsgeschichte. 118 Proponents <strong>of</strong> this school <strong>of</strong> history examine the every-day practices<br />

and the conceptual frameworks that develop around them which people utilize to<br />

understand their world. This approach holds great merit for a study <strong>of</strong> combat troops as it<br />

should be possible to examine how soldiers fit their experiences <strong>of</strong> war and occupation<br />

into pre-existing notions and belief frameworks. 119 By analyzing the writings <strong>of</strong> these<br />

men using this methodology, patterns and practices specific to regions will be identified<br />

in both combat and occupation and this will provide a necessary specificity concerning<br />

both the committing <strong>of</strong> crimes and the motivation for doing so.<br />

Utilizing only German sources, however, necessarily skews the historical record.<br />

Not only do the seemingly complete and comprehensive Wehrmacht records frequently<br />

omit mention <strong>of</strong> atrocities, the records themselves were tampered with after the war. Due<br />

118 On Alltagsgeschichte see Alf Lüdtke, “What is the History <strong>of</strong> Everyday Life and Who are its<br />

Practitioners,” in idem. (ed.), The History <strong>of</strong> Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and<br />

Ways <strong>of</strong> Life (Princeton, 1995), pp. 3-40.<br />

119 Two excellent examples <strong>of</strong> this methodological approach are Alf Lüdtke, “The Appeal <strong>of</strong> Exterminating<br />

‘Others’: German Workers and the Limits <strong>of</strong> Resistance,” in Journal <strong>of</strong> Modern History (64/1992), pp. 46-<br />

67, and Hans-Joachim Schröder, “Alltagsleben im Russlandkrieg 1941-1945. Eine deutsche Perspektive,”<br />

in Hans-Adolf Jacobson (ed.), Deutsch-russische Zeitenwende. Krieg und Frieden 1941-1945 (Baden-<br />

Baden, 1995), pp. 388-409.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!