30.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Institute of Network Cultures

Download PDF - Institute of Network Cultures

Download PDF - Institute of Network Cultures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Arjon Dunnewind - 'Impakt Channel: Content with Context'. Photo by Anne Helmond.<br />

By Stijnie Thuijs<br />

Being the festival, artistic and general director <strong>of</strong> Impakt, Arjon Dunnewind is in charge <strong>of</strong><br />

a database <strong>of</strong> art related content for which he has to decide the most appropriate way <strong>of</strong><br />

uploading to the web. An important factor to take into account, he explains, is that the<br />

audience on the web has different expectations than ʻ<strong>of</strong>fline audienceʼ. Online archives<br />

are the next phase and make us rethink how we structure the art collection, connect both<br />

the online and <strong>of</strong>fline audience and exploit the merits <strong>of</strong> the online environment to use<br />

them in the best possible way.<br />

How to involve an audience?<br />

According to Dunnewind this can be done by providing the viewers quality instead <strong>of</strong><br />

quantity. This means no comment space below the art content. Arjon would rather have<br />

a platform without any comments than low quality comments and spam on his channel.<br />

Moderation and hierarchy are keywords for the Impakt Channel, only inviting experts to<br />

give their opinion and opening little by little. Arjon wouldnʼt mind never to open it for<br />

ordinary users though – as it can degrade the quality.<br />

Legal issues<br />

: A struggle for Dunnewind are the legal issues. Foremost, who is responsible for the<br />

content and the legal issues is not always clear. While being online for supposedly 20<br />

years, only since 5 years has there been options for artists as to in which degree their<br />

work is allowed to be published. There is no standard agreement with the artists (all<br />

permission has to be confirmed in direct contact with the artist) and more importantly:<br />

the artists themselves havenʼt always cleared the legal issues <strong>of</strong> the materials used in<br />

their pieces. On the sunny side <strong>of</strong> the legal issues is that the organization is relatively<br />

small, so they donʼt receive a lot <strong>of</strong> complaints. Also there is not much historical material<br />

in the database and the legal methods Impakt uses now actually bond the artist and the<br />

organization really well. Which results in allowing to put the work online.<br />

The Impakt Channel : Give context to content. Or: how to make a difference<br />

: To differentiate yourself from video websites such as YouTube – which <strong>of</strong>fer little to no<br />

context - could be done in various ways. To Arjon, a way is to do that is to <strong>of</strong>fer unique<br />

content. Also building a unique platform with alternate possibilities and limitations is a<br />

manner. Furthermore, connecting the online channel with the <strong>of</strong>fline events, art projects<br />

and festivals, including bonus material for example, are adequate ways to create<br />

context. As are the display <strong>of</strong> background information, articles, introductions and<br />

comments by invited experts, interviews and curatorial texts from the original programs.<br />

All that said, Arjon concludes with his wish for the online Impakt environment. ʻWe want<br />

the Impakt Channel to become a new platformʼ, he says. A platform that creates<br />

exhibitions online, a flexible, dynamic, autonomous space on which can be<br />

experimented.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!