10.09.2013 Views

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(9) a) Active:<br />

John servera-r Jane.<br />

3SG serve-PRS 3SG<br />

SUBJ OBJ<br />

‘John is serv<strong>in</strong>g Jane.’<br />

b) <strong>Passive</strong>:<br />

Jane servera-s av John.<br />

3SG serve-PASS by 3SG<br />

SUBJ OBLag<br />

‘Jane is be<strong>in</strong>g served by John’.<br />

Passivization is often referred to as an agent demot<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong> the literature (Laanemets, 2012).<br />

2.3 Lexical functional grammar<br />

In the thesis Lexical functional grammar (LFG) is used as a model for semantic and syntactic analysis.<br />

LFG is a theory where the explicit representation of morphosyntactic <strong>in</strong>formation is displayed by<br />

syntactic structures – the lexicon, words and unification is essential <strong>in</strong> the grammar (cf. Van Val<strong>in</strong>,<br />

2001; Kroeger, 2008; Bresnan, 2001). A special feature of LFG is that it analyses clauses <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

at least three 5 dist<strong>in</strong>ct parallel levels of representation (Aust<strong>in</strong>, 2001:6-16):<br />

C-structure – <strong>The</strong> constituent structure analyses the constituents <strong>in</strong> terms of word order, and phrasal<br />

group<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the form of context-free phrase structure trees.<br />

F-structure – <strong>The</strong> functional structure deal with functional <strong>in</strong>formation/features such as grammatical<br />

functions like SUBJ, OBJ and also with functions of discourse like TOPIC. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

displayed <strong>in</strong> matrices of attribute-value pairs.<br />

A-structure – <strong>The</strong> argument structure deals with predicate argument <strong>in</strong>formation. E.g. number and<br />

type of arguments of an argument and the semantic role assigned by arguments, cf. (12). A-structures<br />

are displayed as arrays and predicates and argument slots with associated semantic roles such as<br />

AGENT, PATIENT and EXPERIENCER 6 .<br />

Below the relations between the f- and c-structures are shown accord<strong>in</strong>g to an example of an English<br />

passive clause taken from Van Val<strong>in</strong> (2001:191) <strong>in</strong> (Figure 1).<br />

5 <strong>The</strong>re are several other structures which are hypothesized <strong>in</strong> LFG work. However, solely the structures<br />

displayed <strong>in</strong> (2.3) are used <strong>in</strong> the thesis (cf. Falk, 2001).<br />

6<br />

<strong>The</strong> semantic roles are taken from Kroeger (2008:9) and Lyngfelt (2007). Lyngfelt prefers to devide the agent<br />

role <strong>in</strong>to agentive/cause which is partly applied <strong>in</strong> this thesis).<br />

EXPERIENCER; animate entity, which perceives a stimulus or registers a particular mental or emotional process<br />

or state. INSTRUMENT; <strong>in</strong>animate entity which undergoes a change of location or possession, or whose location<br />

is be<strong>in</strong>g specified. PATIENT; entity which is acted upon, affected, or created – or of which a state or change is<br />

predicated.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!