10.09.2013 Views

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

The Double Passive in Swedish - Institutionen för lingvistik ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Swedish</strong><br />

A case of creat<strong>in</strong>g rais<strong>in</strong>g verbs <strong>in</strong> the Scand<strong>in</strong>avian languages.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary aim of this thesis is to map the syntactic and semantic nature, and the frequency of the<br />

<strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Swedish</strong> – this due to the fact that little research regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong><br />

constructions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Swedish</strong> has been done. In the thesis Lexical functional grammar (LFG) is used as a<br />

model for semantic and syntactic analysis. <strong>The</strong> analysis showed that when the AGENT <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Double</strong><br />

<strong>Passive</strong> construction is suppressed, it creates an argument structure that triggers an equi verb to occur<br />

as a rais<strong>in</strong>g verb (cf. Ørsnes, 2006). Overt agents with<strong>in</strong> constructions conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong><br />

showed an even lower frequency than the low frequencies documented <strong>in</strong> previous research <strong>in</strong> passive<br />

voice by Silén (1997) and Laanemets (2010). <strong>The</strong> lower frequency is a result of the fact that a non-<br />

overt agent <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong> construction is suppressed twice. <strong>The</strong> results of a corpus study showed<br />

a frequency of 3.57 % of overt agents with<strong>in</strong> constructions conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong>s. <strong>The</strong><br />

complementizer ‘att’ (‘to’) <strong>in</strong> the subord<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itive clause of a <strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong> is overtly<br />

expressed, partly depend<strong>in</strong>g on the degree of modality of the matrix verb (cf. Sundman, 1983;<br />

Teleman, 1999; Lagerwall, 1999), and the degree of semantic bond<strong>in</strong>g between the matrix verb and<br />

the complement (Givón, 2001b). <strong>The</strong> data (matrix verbs) collected <strong>in</strong> the corpus study was analysed<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to a categoris<strong>in</strong>g-system <strong>in</strong> SAG (Teleman, 1999) and <strong>in</strong> Givón (2001a) and Givón (2001b).<br />

<strong>The</strong> matrix verbs with strong nom<strong>in</strong>al (lexical) properties, e.g. ‘planera’ (‘plan’), showed a high<br />

frequency of occurrence with full <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itives, as compared to matrix verbs with largely grammatical<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g, e.g. ‘avse’ (<strong>in</strong>tend’).<br />

Keywords<br />

<strong>Double</strong> <strong>Passive</strong>, Complex <strong>Passive</strong>, control, equi, rais<strong>in</strong>g, agent, <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itival complement,<br />

complementizer, LFG.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!