10.09.2013 Views

On Spatial Processes and Asymptotic Inference under Near$Epoch ...

On Spatial Processes and Asymptotic Inference under Near$Epoch ...

On Spatial Processes and Asymptotic Inference under Near$Epoch ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for some nonnegative constants wij such that<br />

lim<br />

s!1 sup<br />

X<br />

wij = 0: (16)<br />

i2Zd j2Zd : (i;j)>s<br />

Finally, we assume that the input process " = f"i; i 2 Z d g has uniformly<br />

bounded second moments, i.e.,<br />

Then, one can establish the following result.<br />

sup<br />

i2Zd k"ik2 < 1 (17)<br />

Proposition 6 Under conditions (15)-(17), the r<strong>and</strong>om …eld Y = fYi; i 2 Z d g<br />

given by (14) is well-de…ned <strong>and</strong> uniformly L2-NED on the r<strong>and</strong>om …eld " =<br />

f"i; i 2 Z d g.<br />

Conditions (15)-(17) are analogous to those used by Doukhan <strong>and</strong> Louhichi<br />

(1999) for time-series Bernoulli shifts. Condition (15) is ful…lled if the functions<br />

fi have bounded partial derivatives, i.e., j@fi=@xjj wij.<br />

Thus, the class of NED spatial processes covers fairly large classes of linear<br />

<strong>and</strong> nonlinear transformations of r<strong>and</strong>om …elds.<br />

4 Limit Theorems<br />

4.1 Central Limit Theorem<br />

In the following, we introduce our CLT for real valued r<strong>and</strong>om …elds Y =<br />

fYi;n; i 2 Dn; n 1g, where Z is assumed to be L2-NED on some vector-valued<br />

-mixing r<strong>and</strong>om …eld " = f"i;n; i 2 Tn; n 1g with the NED coe¢ cients<br />

f (s)g, where Dn Tn D <strong>and</strong> the lattice D satis…es Assumption 1. In the<br />

sequel, we will use the following notation:<br />

Sn = X<br />

i2Dn<br />

Yi;n;<br />

2<br />

n = var(Sn):<br />

For ease of reference, we state below the de…nition of the -mixing coe¢ cients<br />

employed in the paper.<br />

De…nition 2 Let A <strong>and</strong> B be two -algebras of F, <strong>and</strong> let<br />

(A; B) = sup(jP (AB) P (A)P (B)j; A 2 A; B 2 B);<br />

For U Dn <strong>and</strong> V Dn, let n(U) = ("i;n; i 2 U) <strong>and</strong> n(U; V ) =<br />

( n(U); n(V )). Then, the -mixing coe¢ cients for the r<strong>and</strong>om …eld " are<br />

de…ned as:<br />

(u; v; r) = sup<br />

n<br />

sup(<br />

n(U; V ); jUj u; jV j v; (U; V ) r):<br />

U;V<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!