21.09.2013 Views

The Making of an HDTV Lens - PBS

The Making of an HDTV Lens - PBS

The Making of an HDTV Lens - PBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

A Look inside Optical Technologies<br />

Laurence J. Thorpe


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• What makes a “High Definition” <strong>Lens</strong> ?<br />

• <strong>The</strong> distinct separation between the large “Box” <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>d the Portable EFP/ENG lens<br />

• Portable HD <strong>Lens</strong>es – New Cost-Perform<strong>an</strong>ce dilemma<br />

• <strong>The</strong> “Sweet zone” <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• A glimpse into the world <strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> design


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

What makes<br />

a<br />

“High Definition” <strong>Lens</strong>?


Optical “High Definition”<br />

Concept <strong>of</strong><br />

Line Pairs<br />

Per<br />

Millimeter


2/3-Inch Image Format<br />

9.6mm<br />

5.4mm 11 mm<br />

1mm


2/3-Inch Image Format<br />

9.6mm<br />

5.4mm 1mm<br />

?


HD Camera Resolution<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong>-camera resolution in the vertical domain is<br />

determined by the number <strong>of</strong> vertical samples<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re are 1080 vertical samples in the 1080-line<br />

HD format


HD <strong>Lens</strong>-Camera Resolution<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong>-camera resolution in the vertical domain is<br />

determined by the number <strong>of</strong> vertical samples<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re are 1080 vertical samples in the 1080-line<br />

HD format<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong> Camera resolution in the horizontal domain is<br />

determined by the camera b<strong>an</strong>dwidth<br />

• SMPTE recommended filter limits this to 30 MHz


• 2/3-Inch Format<br />

Resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Coupled to a 1920 (H) x 1080 (V) Imager<br />

9.6mm<br />

2/3-Inch<br />

5.4mm Image Format<br />

1080 Lines<br />

= 540 Lp/mm<br />

• 1080-line sc<strong>an</strong>ning c<strong>an</strong> unambiguously resolve 540 black <strong>an</strong>d white<br />

cycles (or Line Pairs)<br />

• 540 LP within a vertical image height <strong>of</strong> 5.4 mm me<strong>an</strong>s the HD lens<br />

must be capable <strong>of</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sferring 540 / 5.4 = 100 Line Pairs per<br />

millimeter (LP/mm) with as high contrast as possible


One<br />

Millimeter<br />

1080-Line <strong>HDTV</strong><br />

For the 1920 (H) x 1080 (V)<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> St<strong>an</strong>dard<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

must be capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sferring<br />

100 Line Pairs<br />

per<br />

Millimeter<br />

with High Contrast


One<br />

Millimeter<br />

480-Line SDTV<br />

For the 720 (H) x 480 (V)<br />

SDTV St<strong>an</strong>dard<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

must be capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sferring<br />

44 Line Pairs<br />

per<br />

Millimeter<br />

with High Contrast


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

So far, we have only spoken about<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> resolution (at the center <strong>of</strong> the lens)<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are m<strong>an</strong>y other key optical parameters<br />

that also contribute to<br />

overall image quality


Overall <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> Perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

1. Sensitivity<br />

2. Image Sharpness<br />

(at picture center)<br />

3. Image Sharpness<br />

(at picture corners)<br />

4. Relative Light Distribution<br />

(evenness <strong>of</strong> brightness<br />

across image pl<strong>an</strong>e)<br />

5. Black Reproduction<br />

6. Contrast Ratio<br />

7. Chromatic Aberration<br />

8. Monochromatic Aberrations<br />

9. Geometric Distortion<br />

10. Focus Breathing<br />

(Ch<strong>an</strong>ge in <strong>an</strong>gle <strong>of</strong> view<br />

as focus is adjusted)


Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Program Genres<br />

• Small Market News<br />

• Ancillary News<br />

• B & I Production<br />

• Wedding & Event<br />

• Corporate<br />

• Education<br />

• ProSumer<br />

• News<br />

• Reality Shows<br />

• Freel<strong>an</strong>ce Journalist<br />

• Major budget Movie<br />

• Mid budget Movie<br />

• TV Commercials<br />

• Prime Time Drama<br />

• Sitcom<br />

• Comedy show<br />

• Sports & Events<br />

• Natural History<br />

• Documentary<br />

• Magazine<br />

Very<br />

High-End<br />

High-End<br />

Mainstream<br />

HD Workhorse<br />

Low-budget<br />

HD Production


Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> Production Budgets<br />

• Production Budgets<br />

$ 100M<br />

• Production Budgets<br />

$ 250K<br />

$ 10K<br />

Very<br />

High-End<br />

Hi-End<br />

Mainstream<br />

HD Workhorse<br />

Low-budget<br />

HD Production<br />

• Production Budgets<br />

$250M<br />

$ 50M<br />

$ 1M • Production Budgets<br />

$ 2 M<br />

$100K


Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Digital <strong>HDTV</strong> Acquisition system<br />

$ 80,000<br />

$ 30,000<br />

$ 15,000<br />

2/3-inch<br />

HD Camcorders<br />

1/3-inch<br />

HD Camcorders<br />

1/4 <strong>an</strong>d 1/5-inch<br />

Camcorders<br />

2/3-inch<br />

HD Cameras<br />

HD Camcorders<br />

2/3-inch<br />

HD Cameras<br />

HD Camcorders<br />

> $250K<br />

35mm<br />

Very<br />

High-End<br />

High End<br />

Mainstream<br />

HD Workhorse<br />

Low-budget<br />

HD Production<br />

Single Sensor Cameras<br />

2/3-inch<br />

HD Cameras<br />

HD Camcorders<br />

1/2-inch<br />

HD Cameras<br />

HD Camcorders


Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Tri-Imager Digital Cameras/Camcorders<br />

$ 30,000<br />

• 2/3-inch<br />

• 1/2-inch<br />

• 1/3-inch<br />

Exclusively<br />

2/3-inch<br />

Very<br />

High-End<br />

High-End<br />

Mainstream<br />

HD Workhorse<br />

Low-Budget<br />

HD Production<br />

Box <strong>Lens</strong>es<br />

• Field<br />

• Studio<br />

Portable <strong>Lens</strong>es<br />

• Cine<br />

• EFP<br />

Portable <strong>Lens</strong>es<br />

• EFP<br />

• ENG<br />

• Low-cost studio


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Distinct Separation<br />

between the<br />

Large “Box” <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>d the<br />

Portable EFP/ENG lens


Difference between<br />

Full Size Studio <strong>an</strong>d Portable ENG <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Full Size Studio<br />

• Primary consideration is highest overall<br />

Imaging Perform<strong>an</strong>ce


Full Size Studio<br />

• Primary consideration is highest overall<br />

Imaging Perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

Difference between<br />

Full Size Studio <strong>an</strong>d Portable ENG <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• Large glass elements used:<br />

• To elevate optical sensitivity<br />

• Facilitate tighter control <strong>of</strong> surface toler<strong>an</strong>ces for<br />

highest perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• More glass elements deployed:<br />

• To provide more design degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom to<br />

achieve lower monochromatic <strong>an</strong>d chromatic<br />

aberrations<br />

• Weight rapidly increases<br />

• Not a signific<strong>an</strong>t consideration with full studio<br />

cameras<br />

• Typical studio lenses weigh in between 45<br />

<strong>an</strong>d 50 lbs


Full Size Studio<br />

• Primary consideration is highest overall<br />

Imaging Perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

Difference between<br />

Full Size Studio <strong>an</strong>d Portable ENG <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• Large glass elements used:<br />

• To elevate optical sensitivity<br />

• Facilitate tighter control <strong>of</strong> surface toler<strong>an</strong>ces for<br />

highest perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• More glass elements deployed:<br />

• To provide more design degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom to<br />

achieve lower monochromatic <strong>an</strong>d chromatic<br />

aberrations<br />

• Weight rapidly increases<br />

• Not a signific<strong>an</strong>t consideration with full studio<br />

cameras<br />

• Typical studio lenses weigh in between 45<br />

<strong>an</strong>d 50 lbs<br />

ENG Portable<br />

• Primary consideration is lowest<br />

Size <strong>an</strong>d Weight


Portable HD ENG/EFP <strong>Lens</strong>es


Difference between<br />

Full Size Studio <strong>an</strong>d Portable ENG <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Full Size Studio<br />

• Primary consideration is highest overall<br />

Imaging Perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• Large glass elements used:<br />

• To elevate optical sensitivity<br />

• Facilitate tighter control <strong>of</strong> surface toler<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

for highest perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• More glass elements deployed:<br />

• To provide more design degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom<br />

to achieve lower monochromatic <strong>an</strong>d<br />

chromatic aberrations<br />

• Weight rapidly increases<br />

• Not a signific<strong>an</strong>t consideration with full studio<br />

cameras<br />

• Typical studio lenses weigh in between<br />

45 <strong>an</strong>d 50 lbs<br />

ENG Portable<br />

• Primary consideration is lowest<br />

Size <strong>an</strong>d Weight<br />

• Smaller glass elements are used:<br />

• To signific<strong>an</strong>tly curtail size <strong>an</strong>d weight<br />

• Fewer glass elements deployed:<br />

• To reduce overall size <strong>an</strong>d weight<br />

• Necessary compromises made in<br />

aberration control<br />

• Weight is tightly controlled<br />

• In the region <strong>of</strong> 4.0 lbs for ENG<br />

• In the region <strong>of</strong> 6.0 lbs for<br />

EFP


Picture <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong><br />

Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Box Studio <strong>Lens</strong> Portable EFP/ENG <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Attributes<br />

1. Sensitivity Very High High<br />

2. Image Sharpness Very High High<br />

( at picture center)<br />

3. Image Sharpness High Reasonably high<br />

(at picture corners)<br />

4. Relative Light Distribution Very Good Reasonable<br />

(evenness <strong>of</strong> brightness<br />

across image pl<strong>an</strong>e)<br />

5. Black Reproduction Superb Very Good<br />

6. Contrast Ratio Exceptionally High High<br />

7. Chromatic Aberration Tightly Controlled Controlled<br />

8. Monochromatic Aberrations Tightly Controlled Controlled<br />

9. Geometric Distortion Very small Reasonable<br />

10. Focus Breathing Almost zero High (ENG lens)<br />

(Ch<strong>an</strong>ge in <strong>an</strong>gle <strong>of</strong> view<br />

as focus is adjusted) Moderate ( EFP lens)


<strong>The</strong> Bottom Line<br />

<strong>The</strong> Essential Difference<br />

between<br />

the HD Studio Image<br />

<strong>an</strong>d<br />

the Field Acquisition Image


Studio imagery<br />

c<strong>an</strong> have<br />

high priority talent<br />

<strong>an</strong>ywhere<br />

in the image pl<strong>an</strong>e


ENG Field capture<br />

typically places a priority<br />

on image quality<br />

in the central zone


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

PORTABLE HD EFP/ENG <strong>Lens</strong>:<br />

<strong>The</strong> New<br />

Cost-Perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

Dilemma


100<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

Typical MTF <strong>of</strong> a High-end 2/3-Inch <strong>Lens</strong><br />

2/3-inch<br />

Reference<br />

60% contrast at 100 LP/mm<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 LP/mm<br />

Line-Pairs per<br />

Millimeter


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Assume that the Goal is<br />

to make<br />

small format HD lenses<br />

equal in MTF to that <strong>of</strong><br />

the 2/3-inch lens


Resolution <strong>of</strong> a 1/2-inch <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• 1/2-Inch Format<br />

3.92 mm<br />

6.97 mm<br />

1/2-Inch<br />

Image<br />

Format<br />

1080 Lines<br />

= 540 Lp/mm<br />

• 1080-line sc<strong>an</strong>ning c<strong>an</strong> unambiguously resolve 540 black <strong>an</strong>d white<br />

cycles (or Line Pairs)<br />

• 540 LP within a vertical image height <strong>of</strong> 3.92 mm me<strong>an</strong>s that the<br />

HD lens must be capable <strong>of</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sferring 540 / 3.92 = 138 Line Pairs<br />

per millimeter (LP/mm) with as high contrast as possible


100<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

Relative MTF <strong>of</strong> 2/3-Inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/2-inch <strong>Lens</strong><br />

To Produce Equal <strong>HDTV</strong> Sharpness<br />

2/3-inch<br />

(Reference)<br />

1/2-inch<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 LP/mm<br />

Line-Pairs per<br />

<strong>The</strong> smaller image formats<br />

must have signific<strong>an</strong>tly higher optical perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

Millimeter


Resolution <strong>of</strong> a 1/3-inch <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• 1/3-Inch Format<br />

2.9 mm<br />

5.2 mm<br />

1/3-Inch<br />

Image<br />

Format<br />

1080 Lines<br />

= 540 Lp/mm<br />

• 1080-line sc<strong>an</strong>ning c<strong>an</strong> unambiguously resolve 540 black <strong>an</strong>d white<br />

cycles (or Line Pairs)<br />

• 540 LP within a vertical image height <strong>of</strong> 2.9 mm me<strong>an</strong>s that the HD<br />

lens must be capable <strong>of</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>sferring 540 / 2.9 = 184 Line Pairs per<br />

millimeter (LP/mm) with as high contrast as possible


Relative MTF <strong>of</strong> 2/3-Inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/2-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/3-inch <strong>Lens</strong><br />

To Produce Equal <strong>HDTV</strong> Sharpness<br />

100<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

2/3-inch<br />

(Reference) 1/2-inch<br />

1/3-inch<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180LP/mm<br />

Line-Pairs per<br />

Millimeter<br />

<strong>The</strong> smaller image formats<br />

must have progressively higher optical perform<strong>an</strong>ce


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• To produce a 1/2-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/3-inch lens to<br />

increasing levels <strong>of</strong> resolution perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• Would entail a subst<strong>an</strong>tial increase in cost<br />

over that <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>an</strong>dard 2/3-inch HD lens


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• To produce a 1/2-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/3-inch lens to<br />

increasing levels <strong>of</strong> resolution perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

• Would entail a subst<strong>an</strong>tial increase in cost<br />

over that <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>an</strong>dard 2/3-inch HD lens<br />

• This flies in the face <strong>of</strong> marketplace expectations,<br />

however,<br />

• That small format lenses be signific<strong>an</strong>tly LESS<br />

costly th<strong>an</strong> the 2/3-inch lens


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Marketplace sought<br />

Low-cost HD acquisition<br />

which created <strong>an</strong> opposing imperative<br />

to<br />

small format HD <strong>Lens</strong> Design


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Very Broad R<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> production genres has spurred the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a hierarchy <strong>of</strong><br />

HD Cameras <strong>an</strong>d HD <strong>Lens</strong>es


Introducing the Concept <strong>of</strong><br />

Portable HD <strong>Lens</strong> Platforms<br />

LENS PLATFORM Characteristics<br />

• Image Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Optical<br />

• Optomech<strong>an</strong>ics Mech<strong>an</strong>ical<br />

• Extender Included (or not)<br />

• Operational Control Electrical<br />

• Camera Interface Optical / Mech<strong>an</strong>ical / Electrical


<strong>Lens</strong> Platform Pricing Related to<br />

Design Attributes<br />

LENS PLATFORM Characteristics<br />

• $$$$$ Optical<br />

• $$$$ Mech<strong>an</strong>ical<br />

• $$$ Extender (or not)<br />

• $$ Electrical<br />

• $ Optical/Mech<strong>an</strong>ical/Electrical


<strong>Lens</strong> Platform 1: 2/3-inch<br />

LENS PLATFORM #1 Characteristics<br />

• Image Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Highest possible<br />

• Optomech<strong>an</strong>ics Most robust (Magnesium)<br />

• Extender Yes<br />

• Operational Control All digital 16-bit servo<br />

• Camera Interface Internationally st<strong>an</strong>dardized


<strong>Lens</strong> Platform 2: 2/3-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/2-inch<br />

LENS PLATFORM #2 Characteristics<br />

2/3-inch 1/2-inch<br />

• Image Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Very good Very good<br />

• Optomech<strong>an</strong>ics Highest Highest<br />

• Extender Yes Yes<br />

• Operational Control All-digital All-digital<br />

16-bit servos 16-bit servos<br />

• Camera Interface Internationally Non-st<strong>an</strong>dard<br />

st<strong>an</strong>dardized Cam m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer<br />

proprietary


<strong>Lens</strong> Platform 3: 2/3-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/2-inch <strong>an</strong>d 1/3-inch<br />

LENS PLATFORM # 3 Characteristics<br />

2/3-inch 1/2-inch 1/3-inch<br />

• Image Perform<strong>an</strong>ce Very good Very good Very good<br />

• Optomech<strong>an</strong>ics Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum<br />

• Extender No No No<br />

• Operational Control Analog Analog Analog<br />

• Camera Interface Internationally Non-st<strong>an</strong>dard Non-st<strong>an</strong>dard<br />

st<strong>an</strong>dardized Cam m<strong>an</strong>ufacturer Cam M<strong>an</strong>ufacturer<br />

proprietary Proprietary


100<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

5.4<br />

mm<br />

<strong>Lens</strong> Platforms # 2 <strong>an</strong>d # 3<br />

Relative to 2/3-Inch Platform # 1<br />

5.2mm<br />

1/3-inch<br />

1/2 -inch<br />

9.6 mm<br />

6.97mm<br />

2.9<br />

mm<br />

3.92<br />

mm<br />

2/3-inch<br />

1/2-Inch<br />

1/3-Inch<br />

2/3-Inch<br />

25 50 75 100<br />

LP/mm


Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> EFP/Cine/ENG <strong>Lens</strong> Platforms<br />

$ 30,000<br />

$15,000<br />

$ 15,000<br />

Platform 2<br />

<strong>Lens</strong>es<br />

$8,000 -- $ 10,000<br />

$22,000 -- $80,000<br />

> $250K<br />

35mm<br />

Very<br />

High-End<br />

High End<br />

Mainstream<br />

HD Workhorse<br />

Low-budget<br />

HD Production<br />

Single Sensor Cameras<br />

Platform 1<br />

<strong>Lens</strong>es<br />

$15,000 -- $ 25,000<br />

Platform 3<br />

<strong>Lens</strong>es


Image Format Size <strong>an</strong>d Camera Imager<br />

• <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the image format also has implications<br />

for the camera sensor


Image Format Size <strong>an</strong>d Camera Imager<br />

• <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the image format also has implications<br />

for the camera sensor<br />

• M<strong>an</strong>y small format HD camcorders utilize<br />

subsampled imagers to achieve a better compromise<br />

between MTF, dynamic r<strong>an</strong>ge, <strong>an</strong>d noise


Image Format Size <strong>an</strong>d Camera Imager<br />

• <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the image format also has implications<br />

for the camera sensor<br />

• M<strong>an</strong>y small format HD camcorders utilize<br />

subsampled imagers to achieve a better compromise<br />

between MTF, dynamic r<strong>an</strong>ge, <strong>an</strong>d noise<br />

• This c<strong>an</strong> further separate the HD lens-camera<br />

perform<strong>an</strong>ce from that <strong>of</strong> the 2/3-inch system


Current HD Image Sensors<br />

2/3-inch 1/2-inch 1/3-inch<br />

1920 (H) x 1080 (V) 1920 (H) x 1080 (V)<br />

1440 (H) x 1080 (V) 1440 (H) x 1080 (V)<br />

960 (H) x 1080 (V)<br />

1280 (H) x 720 (V) 1280 (H) x 720 (V)<br />

960 (H) x 720 (V) 960 (H) x 540 (V)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> “Sweet Zone”<br />

<strong>of</strong> Operation<br />

in <strong>an</strong> HD <strong>Lens</strong>


Two Limitations on <strong>Lens</strong> Sharpness<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limitations<br />

“Sweet<br />

Zone”<br />

Wide open<br />

2 – 3 Stops<br />

Stopped Down<br />

Focus Aberrations:<br />

• Spherical<br />

• Comatic<br />

• Astigmatism<br />

• Curvature <strong>of</strong> Field<br />

Chromatic Aberrations<br />

• Longitudinal<br />

• Lateral


Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

Diffraction Limitation with <strong>Lens</strong> Aperture Setting<br />

(Typical 2/3-Inch HD <strong>Lens</strong>)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Desired Resolution = 100 LP/mm<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limited


Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

<strong>The</strong> Resolution “Squeeze”<br />

(Typical 2/3-Inch HD <strong>Lens</strong>)<br />

Focus<br />

Aberration<br />

Limited<br />

Desired Resolution = 100 LP/mm<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limited<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops


Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

<strong>The</strong> Resolution “Squeeze”<br />

(Typical 2/3-Inch HD <strong>Lens</strong>)<br />

Maximum<br />

Resolution<br />

Focus<br />

Aberration<br />

Limited<br />

Desired Resolution = 100 LP/mm<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limited<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops


Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

Resolution Characteristic at Picture Center<br />

(Typical 2/3-Inch HD <strong>Lens</strong>)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops


250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Maximum<br />

Resolution<br />

Focus<br />

Aberration<br />

Limited<br />

EFP/ENG<br />

<strong>Lens</strong><br />

Desired HD Resolution = 100 LP/mm<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limited<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Resolution<br />

LP/mm<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Focus<br />

Aberration<br />

Limited<br />

Maximum<br />

Resolution<br />

Studio<br />

<strong>Lens</strong><br />

Desired HD Resolution = 100 LP/mm<br />

Diffraction<br />

Limited<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

Aperture in F - Stops


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong>-Camera Sensitivity<br />

<strong>Lens</strong> Scene Illumination<br />

Setting (Lux)<br />

F – 16.0<br />

F – 11.0<br />

F – 10.0 2000<br />

F – 8.0 1600<br />

F – 5.6 800<br />

F – 4.0 400<br />

F – 2.8 200<br />

F – 2.0 100<br />

F – 1.5 40<br />

F – 1.2<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio camera<br />

Sensitivity Specification


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong>-Camera Sensitivity<br />

<strong>Lens</strong> Scene Illumination<br />

Setting (Lux)<br />

F – 16.0<br />

F – 11.0<br />

F – 10.0 2000<br />

F – 8.0 1600<br />

F – 5.6 800<br />

F – 4.0 400<br />

F – 2.8 200<br />

F – 2.0 100<br />

F – 1.5 40<br />

F – 1.2<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio camera<br />

Sensitivity Specification<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Maximum Aperture<br />

Specification


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong>-Camera Sensitivity<br />

<strong>Lens</strong> Scene Illumination<br />

Setting (Lux)<br />

F – 16.0<br />

F – 11.0<br />

F – 10.0 2000<br />

F – 8.0 1600<br />

F – 5.6 800<br />

F – 4.0 400<br />

F – 2.8 200<br />

F – 2.0 100<br />

F – 1.5 40<br />

F – 1.2<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio camera<br />

Sensitivity Specification<br />

Typical Studio Illumination<br />

is<br />

1000 Lux<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Maximum Aperture<br />

Specification


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong>-Camera Sensitivity<br />

<strong>Lens</strong> Scene Illumination<br />

Setting (Lux)<br />

F – 16.0<br />

F – 11.0<br />

F – 10.0 2000<br />

F – 8.0 1600<br />

F – 5.6 800<br />

F – 4.0 400<br />

F – 2.8 200<br />

F – 2.0 100<br />

F – 1.5 40<br />

F – 1.2<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio camera<br />

Sensitivity Specification<br />

Recommended<br />

R<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> Illumination<br />

Levels<br />

Contemporary 2/3-inch<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> Studio <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Maximum Aperture<br />

Specification


Sweet Zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> Operation<br />

Each lens has its own technical personality in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the behavior <strong>of</strong> multiple imaging attributes when<br />

operational controls (Zoom, Focus, <strong>an</strong>d Aperture) are<br />

m<strong>an</strong>ipulated.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are not published – <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> only be identified<br />

with careful testing


Sweet Zone <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> Operation<br />

One example is the behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> MTF<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong> MTF varies from picture center to the extremities<br />

<strong>of</strong> the image pl<strong>an</strong>e<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong> MTF varies with ch<strong>an</strong>ges in focal length<br />

• <strong>Lens</strong> MTF varies with Aperture setting<br />

<strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> these ch<strong>an</strong>ges is unique the particular<br />

design optimization <strong>of</strong> each lens model


3.9 mm<br />

9.6 mm<br />

7.0 mm<br />

Center<br />

3.5 mm<br />

Middle<br />

Corner<br />

5.4 mm<br />

2.0 mm


100<br />

90<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

80<br />

70<br />

MTF Pr<strong>of</strong>ile with Focal Length<br />

(Measured at 56 Lp/mm)<br />

170mm<br />

40mm<br />

Center Middle Corner<br />

Image Height<br />

6.5mm<br />

At<br />

F4.0


100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

MTF<br />

%<br />

MTF Pr<strong>of</strong>ile with Focal Length<br />

(Measured at 56 Lp/mm)<br />

170mm<br />

40mm<br />

6.5mm<br />

Center Middle Corner<br />

Image Height<br />

At<br />

F1.5


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

A Glimpse<br />

into the world<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> design


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Contemporary Supercomputers<br />

Empower<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> the “Spot Diagram”<br />

in <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> design<br />

for optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> Multiple Variables


Concept <strong>of</strong> Selected Ray Bundles<br />

Object<br />

Image


Concept <strong>of</strong> the Light Ray Bundle<br />

Provides a “Head On” view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the local ray bundles<br />

across the image pl<strong>an</strong>e


Concept <strong>of</strong> the Light Ray Bundle<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> designer c<strong>an</strong> select<br />

a specific qu<strong>an</strong>tity <strong>of</strong> rays<br />

within a given bundle <strong>an</strong>d simulate<br />

its behavior in passage<br />

through the lens<br />

Ray Bundle<br />

Or<br />

Pencil<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

…… ……<br />

……<br />

…… ……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……<br />

……


Spot Diagram <strong>an</strong>d On Axis Ray Bundle<br />

(Spherical Aberration)


Combination <strong>of</strong> Monochromatic <strong>an</strong>d Chromatic Aberrations


Light Bundles On <strong>an</strong>d Off Axis


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> Cost Factor<br />

Multifaceted Aspects<br />

Of<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> Design


Construction Factors<br />

Of <strong>Lens</strong> Parameters<br />

A1 <strong>Lens</strong> Type<br />

A2 Radius <strong>of</strong> curvature<br />

<strong>of</strong> each lens element<br />

A3 Number <strong>of</strong> elements<br />

A4 Shape <strong>of</strong> each<br />

lens element<br />

A5 Type <strong>of</strong> glass<br />

A6 AR Coating material<br />

A7 Wavelength<br />

tr<strong>an</strong>smission r<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

An-1 Cost<br />

An Toler<strong>an</strong>ce values<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> Optical<br />

Characteristics values<br />

B1 Ray Tracing<br />

B2 Spherical aberration<br />

B3 Astigmatism<br />

B4 Coma<br />

B5 Curvature <strong>of</strong> field<br />

B6 Spot Diagrams<br />

B7 MTF<br />

B8 Aberration simulations<br />

Bm M<strong>an</strong>ufacturing<br />

toler<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>alysis<br />

Ch<strong>an</strong>ge A1 – An parameters<br />

Are all<br />

Specifications<br />

Satisfied ?<br />

NO<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong><br />

Tables <strong>an</strong>d Graphs<br />

expressing<br />

Relationships between<br />

A1 – An<br />

And<br />

B1 – Bm<br />

Ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />

B1 – Bn<br />

Possible ?<br />

YES<br />

YES<br />

NO<br />

Design<br />

Complete<br />

Stop<br />

Ch<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

Design Specifications


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Multilayer<br />

Optical Coatings


Incident<br />

Light<br />

100%<br />

4%<br />

96%<br />

4%<br />

92%<br />

Reflection Loss 8%<br />

100% 92% 85% 78% 72% 65% 61% 56% 52%


Effect <strong>of</strong> Multilayer Antireflective Coatings<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

Reflect<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

%<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

Uncoated <strong>Lens</strong> Element<br />

Single Layer<br />

400 450 500 550 600 650 700


Effect <strong>of</strong> Multilayer Antireflective Coatings<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

Reflect<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

%<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

Uncoated <strong>Lens</strong> Element<br />

Single Layer<br />

Multilayer<br />

400 450 500 550 600 650 700


Anti-Reflective Optical Coatings<br />

Thin film vacuum deposition technology is used to ensure consistent<br />

optical coatings using tr<strong>an</strong>sparent metallic compounds:<br />

• Aluminum (Al)<br />

• SiO2 (quartz)<br />

• Magnesium Fluoride (MgF2)<br />

• Hafnium Oxide HfO2<br />

• Tit<strong>an</strong>ium Dioxide TiO2<br />

• Zirkonium oxide<br />

QA process subjected to spectrophotometric <strong>an</strong>alysis to verify specified<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> each layer in the coating, as well as their orientation<br />

with each other


<strong>The</strong> New TV


<strong>HDTV</strong> Screens continue to Grow !<br />

Sharp 108-inch LCD


<strong>The</strong> New TV


An Final Perspective<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> as<br />

Imaging Gatekeeper<br />

within the<br />

Overall <strong>HDTV</strong> System


2D Image<br />

11 mm Diagonal


<strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> as Imaging Gatekeeper<br />

BIG<br />

Scene<br />

Optical<br />

Minification<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong><br />

Camera<br />

TINY OPTICAL IMAGE<br />

Predetermination <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Sensitivity<br />

• Sharpness<br />

• Contrast<br />

• Color Gamut<br />

BIG<br />

Screen<br />

<strong>HDTV</strong><br />

Display<br />

Image<br />

Magnification


2/3-Inch image format<br />

Glass to Glass<br />

(2/3-Inch image format)<br />

11mm<br />

Diagonal<br />

Image<br />

Origination<br />

96-inch x 25.4<br />

= 2438.4 mm<br />

(Diagonal Display)


Image Magnification<br />

= 2438 / 11<br />

= 222<br />

2/3-Inch image format<br />

Glass to Glass<br />

(2/3-Inch image format)<br />

11mm<br />

Diagonal<br />

Image<br />

Origination<br />

96-inch x 25.4<br />

= 2438.4 mm<br />

(Diagonal Display)


Summary<br />

• Contemporary 2/3-inch <strong>HDTV</strong> lens represents highly adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />

optical technologies<br />

• Final image quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> is hugely determined by the <strong>Lens</strong><br />

• <strong>The</strong>re are valid “Levels” <strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> appropriate to program genres<br />

<strong>an</strong>d related budgets<br />

• “Lower Levels” <strong>of</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> c<strong>an</strong> be made to look remarkably good<br />

with careful exploration <strong>of</strong> “sweet zones” <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> lenses<br />

<strong>an</strong>d cameras


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>HDTV</strong> <strong>Lens</strong><br />

Th<strong>an</strong>k You<br />

For<br />

Your Attention


Production<br />

Super Session<br />

XDCAM HD<br />

John Peterson


Brief History<br />

• 1990-1999 Betacam SP<br />

• 1998-2006 DV <strong>an</strong>d DVCAM<br />

• 2002-2006 Widescreen DVCAM<br />

• 2004-2006 HDCAM<br />

• 2006-20?? XDCAM HD


Why XDCAM HD<br />

• HDCAM equipment was expensive<br />

• FCP workstation with a Kona 2 card <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong><br />

Apple xRaid was expensive<br />

• We needed more Cameras <strong>an</strong>d more work<br />

stations for less money


• Cost<br />

• Quality<br />

Why XDCAM HD<br />

• FCP Compatible (Kona Card not needed)<br />

• File Size (fast drives not needed)<br />

• Industry Accept<strong>an</strong>ce


Hardware<br />

Three PDW-F350 Camcorders<br />

• Genlock <strong>an</strong>d HD-SDI Out<br />

PDW-F70 Studio Player/Recorder<br />

• HD-SDI Out<br />

• Down converted SDI Out<br />

PDW-F30 Non-linear Feeder Deck


Workflow<br />

• Shooter <strong>an</strong>d Editor are one & the same<br />

• 35 Mbps is used for most shoots<br />

• Ingest is slightly faster then real time<br />

• Entire disc or clips c<strong>an</strong> be selected for ingest<br />

• Media is stored on External Firewire drives<br />

• Small amount <strong>of</strong> HDV material is used<br />

• Timeline is XDCAM HD 35 Mbps


Workflow<br />

• Timeline includes Black, Bars, Slate <strong>an</strong>d Countdown<br />

• Finished Program is tr<strong>an</strong>sfer to Disc <strong>an</strong>d Low Res Windows<br />

Media file is placed on Captioners FTP site<br />

• Captioner emails finished Caption file back


Workflow<br />

• HDCAM is used for the HD Closed Captioned Master<br />

• DVCPRO 25 is used for the SD Closed Captioned Master<br />

• HD <strong>an</strong>d SD versions Captioned in a single pass<br />

• Additional copies are made by repeating the Closed<br />

Captioning process


CC Block Diagram<br />

PDW-F70<br />

XDCAM HD<br />

Player/Rec<br />

SDI<br />

HD-<br />

SDI<br />

Time Code<br />

Evertz<br />

HD9084<br />

CC Encoder<br />

Computer<br />

Windows 98<br />

SDI<br />

HD-<br />

SDI<br />

AJ-D750<br />

DVCPRO 25<br />

Player/Rec<br />

HDW-2000<br />

HDCAM<br />

Player/Rec


Negatives<br />

• Cost (Disc’s are reusable, but we don’t)<br />

• Quality (1/2 inch CCD)<br />

• MPEG II Compression<br />

• Render Time


Questions


•<br />

Robert Hutchings<br />

HD vs. HDV


Cameras<br />

• Sony HDCam HDW-730S<br />

• P<strong>an</strong>a Varicam AJ-HDC27FP<br />

• C<strong>an</strong>on XH-A1 HDV<br />

• Sony HVR-Z1U HDV


Sony HDW-730S HDCam<br />

• 1920 X 1080 imager<br />

• 1440 X1080 on tape<br />

• DCT Codec<br />

• 144mb/sec<br />

• $37,000 - $80,000


Sony HDW-730S HDCam


P<strong>an</strong>asonic Varicam AJ-HDC27FP<br />

• 1280 X 720 imager<br />

• 960 X 720 on tape<br />

• DVCPro HD<br />

• 100 mb/sec<br />

• $20,000 - $65,000


P<strong>an</strong>asonic Varicam AJ-HDC27FP


C<strong>an</strong>on XH-A1 HDV<br />

• 1440 X 1080 imager<br />

• 1440 X 1080 on tape<br />

• Mpeg Long GOP HDV<br />

• 25 mb/sec<br />

• $3200


C<strong>an</strong>on XH-A1 HDV


Sony HVR-Z1U HDV<br />

• 960 X 1080 imager<br />

• 1440 X 1080 on tape<br />

• Mpeg Long GOP HDV<br />

• 25 mb/sec<br />

• $4000


Sony HVR-Z1U HDV


detail<br />

• Camera detail level is variable <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> greatly affect<br />

the apparent resolution <strong>of</strong> the picture


• DCT codec<br />

• 100 mb/sec<br />

• 1:6.7 compression<br />

DVCPro HD


P<strong>an</strong>asonic HPX-3000<br />

• 1920 X 1080 imager<br />

• 1920 X 1080 on P2 Card<br />

• AVC-I Intra H.264<br />

• 100 mb/sec<br />

• $60,000


P<strong>an</strong>asonic HPX-3000


Sony XDCamEX1<br />

• 1920 X 1080 imager<br />

• 1920 X1080 SxS card<br />

• Mpeg Long GOP<br />

• 35 mb/sec<br />

• $6,500


Sony XDCamEX1


Conclusions<br />

• Imager size does matter.<br />

• Codec <strong>an</strong>d compression c<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d will effect resolution.<br />

• Detail level is variable <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> greatly affect the<br />

apparent resolution <strong>an</strong>d look <strong>of</strong> the picture.<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re are situations in which a $3200 HDV camera may<br />

be a better choice th<strong>an</strong> a $32,000 camera.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Sony Z1U is hard pressed to give us a good high<br />

definition image.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!