24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Robert <strong>Cecil</strong> with his alchemical abilities, sending him ―a poore present as either [Medley‘s]<br />

weake race affordes or the foggie climate gives life unto‖ as a demonstration <strong>of</strong> his<br />

―carefull endeavours‖. 187 Medley‘s wife Anne died in 1595, and in 1597 Medley turned to<br />

Robert <strong>Cecil</strong> to write a letter encouraging Jane Boughton, a wealthy widow, to marry<br />

him. 188 However, Robert <strong>Cecil</strong> was a very different man from his father. Much more<br />

sceptical about alchemy and alchemists, Medley‘s particular expertise would not have held<br />

so great an appeal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Privy Council became increasingly dissatisfied with Medley‘s management <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisbech prison and its recusant prisoners. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> escapes had increased, and a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> the prisoners were so ill they had to be removed. 189 <strong>Sir</strong> Nicholas Bacon, <strong>William</strong><br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>‘s nephew-in-law and constable <strong>of</strong> Wisbech Castle, pressured Medley over issues<br />

surrounding governance and lodgings. 190 Medley consented in late 1597 to Bacon‘s retainer<br />

<strong>William</strong> Brewster becoming joint keeper <strong>of</strong> the recusants, provided that the <strong>Cecil</strong>s,<br />

―without whom I yield to nothing‖, approved <strong>of</strong> the measure. 191 Medley‘s grief over ―that<br />

most lamentable dispersion‖ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s followers after the <strong>Lord</strong> Treasurer‘s death in August<br />

1598 would have been genuine. 192 He realised just how tied his fortunes were to that <strong>of</strong> his<br />

great patron. Medley cannot have sufficiently ingratiated himself with Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, as by<br />

October 1598 Brewster was the sole keeper at Wisbech. 193 Robert <strong>Cecil</strong> seems to have<br />

ignored Medley‘s further pleas for employment. 194 Finally in late 1600 Medley was once<br />

187 <strong>William</strong> Medley to Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, 8 May 1594, Hatfield House, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong> Papers, M485/6.<br />

188 <strong>William</strong> Medley to Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, 17 February 1597, TNA, SP12/267/42; <strong>William</strong> Medley to <strong>Sir</strong> Robert<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>, 20 May 1597 in R. A. Roberts (ed.), CMS. Vol. 7: 1597, London, 1899, p 206; Clifford A. Thurley and<br />

Dorothea Thurley (eds.), Index <strong>of</strong> the Probate Records <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> the Archdeacon <strong>of</strong> Ely 1513-1857, London, 1976,<br />

p. 127.<br />

189 <strong>The</strong> Privy Council to <strong>Sir</strong> John Higham, 20 September 1597, Dasent (ed.), APC, Volume 28: 1597, London,<br />

1904, p. 6.<br />

190 <strong>William</strong> Medley to Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, 1 August 1597 in Roberts (ed.), CMS, Vol. 7, p. 330.<br />

191 Ibid.<br />

192 <strong>William</strong> Medley to Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, 3 November 1598 in Roberts (ed.), CMS, Vol. 8, p. 421.<br />

193 Privy Council to <strong>William</strong> Brewster in 15 October 1598, John Roche Dasent (ed.), APC, Volume 29: A.D.<br />

1598-1599, London, 1905, p. 228.<br />

194 <strong>William</strong> Medley to Robert <strong>Cecil</strong>, 12 December 1598 in Roberts (ed.), CMS, Vol. 8, p. 492.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!