Conveyance and End-of-Pipe Measures for Stormwater - FCM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A. Stormwater Best Management Practice Facilities A.1 Conveyance Control Figure A–4 Armourstone protection bank Figure A–5 Roadside ditch to replace the traditional curb and gutter system Figure A–6 Grass swale for water conveyance and treatment Figure A–4: Armourstone protection bank A.1.4 Roadside Ditches Reference ■ J.F. Sabourin and Associates, 1999. Evaluation of Roadside Ditches and Other Related Stormwater Management Practices. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. ■ Li, J., R. Orlando, and T. Hogenbirk, 1998. “Environmental Road and Lot Drainage Designs: Alternatives to the Curb-Gutter- Sewer System.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 25. Figure A–5: Roadside ditch to replace the traditional curb and gutter system A.1.5 Grassed Swales References ■ Li, J., R. Orlando, and T. Hogenbirk, 1998. “Environmental Road and Lot Drainage Designs: Alternatives to the Curb-Gutter- Sewer System.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 25. ■ United States, EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Office of Water, 1999a. “Stormwater Technology Fact Sheet: Flow Diversion.” . Accessed November 25, 2004. ■ ---, 1999b. “Stormwater Technology Fact Sheet: Vegetated Swales.” . Accessed November 25, 2004. ■ United States Department of Transportation, FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2004. Stormwater Best Management Practices in an Ultra-Urban Setting: Selection and Monitoring. ■ GVRD (Greater Vancouver Regional District), 2004. Stormwater Source Controls Preliminary Design Guidelines. Figure A–6: Grass swale for water conveyance and treatment A.1.6 Pervious Pipe Systems References ■ Canada, Environment Canada, 1995. “Stormwater Management and Combined Sewer Overflow Control Series: Etobicoke’s Stormwater Exfiltration Project.” Great Lakes Cleanup Fund. ■ Li, J., R. Orlando, and T. Hogenbirk, 1998. “Environmental Road and Lot Drainage Designs: Alternatives to the Curb-Gutter- Sewer System.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 25. ■ GVRD (Greater Vancouver Regional District), 2004. Stormwater Source Controls Preliminary Design Guidelines. 46 Conveyance and End-of-Pipe Measures for Stormwater Control — July 2005
Figure A–7: Pervious pipe exfiltration system Figure A–8: Pervious catch basin Figure A–9: In-Line/Off-Line Storage A.1.7 Pervious Catch Basins Reference ■ United States, EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Office of Water, 1999d. “Stormwater Technology Fact Sheet: Infiltration Trenches.” . Accessed November 26, 2004. A.1.8 In-Line/Off-Line Storage References ■ United States, EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1999. “Combined Sewer Overflow Technology Fact Sheet: Retention Basins.” ■ United States Department of Transportation., FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2004. Stormwater Best Management Practices in an Ultra-Urban Setting: Selection and Monitoring. ■ WPCF (Water Pollution Control Federation), 1989. Combined Sewer Overflow Pollution Abatement, Manual of Practice. No. FD–17, Alexandria Virginia. A.1.9 Real Time Control Reference ■ Schilling, W., 1996. “Potential and Limitations of Real Time Control.” Harrachov, Czech Republic: NATO Advanced Study Institute: Hydroinformatics Tools for Planning, Design, Operation and Rehabilitation of Sewer Systems. Conveyance and End-of-Pipe Measures for Stormwater Control — July 2005 47 A. Stormwater Best Management Practice Facilities A.1 Conveyance Control Figure A–7 Pervious pipe exfiltration system Figure A–8 Pervious catch basin Figure A–9 In-Line/Off-Line Storage
Page 1 and 2: National Guide to Sustainable Munic
Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION InfraGuide ® - Innova
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements
Page 7 and 8: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The dedication of
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Increasing urbani
Page 11 and 12: 1. General 1.1 Introduction Urbaniz
Page 13 and 14: Design storm — A rainfall event o
Page 15 and 16: 2. Rationale 2.1 Urban Stormwater T
Page 17 and 18: 2.2.3 Impacts on Stream Habitat Alo
Page 19 and 20: 3. Conveyance and End-of-Pipe Best
Page 21 and 22: Table 3-1: Evaluation Criteria for
Page 23 and 24: 3.3 Description of Best Management
Page 25 and 26: Table 3-3a: Conveyance Control Best
Page 27 and 28: Table 3-3b: End-of-Pipe Control Bes
Page 29 and 30: Table 3-3b: End-of-Pipe Control Bes
Page 31 and 32: Do any physical constraints at the
Page 33 and 34: 4. Applications and Limitations Tab
Page 35 and 36: Table 4-1a: Application of Conveyan
Page 37 and 38: Table 4-1b: Application of End-of-P
Page 43 and 44: 5. Evaluation of Facilities 5.1 Ope
Page 45: Appendix A: Stormwater Best Managem
Page 49 and 50: A.2.3 Constructed Wetlands Referenc
Page 51 and 52: Figure A-17: Cutaway of a Swirl Con
Page 53 and 54: Appendix B: Design Examples B.1 Des
Page 55 and 56: B.2 Design Example: Development of
Page 57 and 58: B.3 Design Example: Sedimentation F
Page 59 and 60: References AEP (Alberta Environment
Page 61 and 62: Sabourin Kimble & Associates, 1999.

Conveyance and End-of-Pipe Measures for Stormwater - FCM

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?