11.10.2013 Views

Guide to Service Agreements - FCM

Guide to Service Agreements - FCM

Guide to Service Agreements - FCM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UNIT 3<br />

78 – <strong>Service</strong> Agreement Toolkit<br />

3.3 Sample pricing models<br />

This section of the <strong>to</strong>olkit explores pricing options<br />

that your community can consider when<br />

approaching methods for pricing a service<br />

agreement.<br />

These models are for your consideration as<br />

examples of effective and transparent pricing<br />

options and are by no means a definitive list of<br />

pricing arrangements. Ultimately, an effective<br />

pricing model will vary in every circumstance<br />

and will take in<strong>to</strong> consideration local contexts,<br />

which may include the following:<br />

• Population<br />

• Capacity<br />

• Existing infrastructure<br />

• <strong>Service</strong> needs<br />

• Local politics<br />

Model 1: Population ratio pricing model<br />

The following model uses a water and wastewater<br />

service agreement as its example, although<br />

the population ratio method can be used <strong>to</strong><br />

determine pricing for solid waste and fire protection.<br />

Alternatively, this ratio can also be used<br />

<strong>to</strong> calculate the pricing for all four services in a<br />

comprehensive agreement.<br />

CHARACTERISTICS:<br />

• The service provider supplies all the operations<br />

and maintenance (O&M) — meaning<br />

that this pricing model is an effective way<br />

for service recipients with small populations<br />

and low capacity <strong>to</strong> price services.<br />

• This pricing model is very transparent —<br />

it ensures that all costs are well unders<strong>to</strong>od.<br />

It offers an equitable split of O&M costs.<br />

• Population ratio pricing assumes that the<br />

required infrastructure exists.<br />

• This model can be modified on an annual<br />

or biennial basis <strong>to</strong> reflect population and<br />

expenditure changes.<br />

MODEL:<br />

A <strong>to</strong>tal cost of the O&M <strong>to</strong> all existing infrastructure<br />

will be calculated for the municipality<br />

and the First Nation. The <strong>to</strong>tal O&M cost<br />

should include the following considerations:<br />

Water<br />

• opera<strong>to</strong>rs’ salaries (full-time and part-time)<br />

• facilities including plants, reservoirs and<br />

pumphouses<br />

• water mains (supply and distribution mains)<br />

• meters and valves<br />

• chemical and treatment costs<br />

• raw water pumphouse<br />

• raw water supply<br />

• moni<strong>to</strong>ring costs<br />

Wastewater<br />

• lift stations<br />

• mains, force mains, gravity mains<br />

• lagoons (if applicable)<br />

• treatment facility<br />

• chemical and filtering costs<br />

Total average yearly costs for the O&M of these<br />

facilities and services should be tallied in<strong>to</strong> a<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal cost. The <strong>to</strong>tal cost will then be plugged<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the following formula:<br />

Total O&M costs × (First Nations population ÷<br />

municipal population)<br />

= Total First Nations proportionate contribution<br />

<strong>to</strong> annual servicing costs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!