12.10.2013 Views

Journal of Eurasian Studies

Journal of Eurasian Studies

Journal of Eurasian Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April-June 2012 JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES Volume IV., Issue 2.<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

European Communist countries and former Soviet republics, behind Ukraine and Georgia, but ahead <strong>of</strong><br />

Russia. 17 The 2009 Reporters without Borders (RWB) Press Freedom Index ranked Moldova 8 th among<br />

former Soviet states behind Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia Tajikistan, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. 18<br />

Although the 2005 RWB Press Freedom Index ranked Moldova 74 th among countries <strong>of</strong> the world, by<br />

2009, the year Voronin and the Communistd left <strong>of</strong>fice, Moldova had dropped to 114 out <strong>of</strong> 175 countries<br />

surveyed. 19 Even though freedom <strong>of</strong> the media is guaranteed in Moldova by the constitution, domestic<br />

legislation, and international treaties, Voronin and the Communists were able to restrict media freedom<br />

by controlling Moldova’s two broadcasting regulatory bodies, the Broadcasting Coordination Council<br />

(BCC) and the Supervisory Board (SB) <strong>of</strong> Teleradio Moldova. According to Freedom House the<br />

Communists treated Teleradio Moldova “as a part <strong>of</strong> its press service.” 20 Consequently, biased coverage<br />

favoring the Communists became the norm for the public broadcaster Teleradio Moldova, along with a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> other broadcasters, especially during parliamentary election campaigns. At the same time,<br />

media that did not speak highly <strong>of</strong> the Communists periodically endured harassment, “heavy political<br />

and financial pressure,” verbal and occasionally physical abuse, restricted coverage <strong>of</strong> broadcasts, and<br />

even “arbitrary license annulments and distribution <strong>of</strong> licenses according to political loyalty.” 21<br />

The AEI, however, made a freer media another one <strong>of</strong> its top priorities. The AEI, with the advice and<br />

coaching <strong>of</strong> the EU and NGO’s, has made substantial progress in bringing Moldova into conformity with<br />

international journalistic standards. These included a shakeup <strong>of</strong> Teleradio Moldova and its Supervisory<br />

Board and the passage <strong>of</strong> a Law on Freedom <strong>of</strong> Expression. 22 In the 2010 RWB Press Freedom Index,<br />

Moldova rose to a world ranking <strong>of</strong> 75 from its bleak 2009 ranking <strong>of</strong> 114, and in the 2011-2012 RWB<br />

index improved to a world ranking <strong>of</strong> 53. Moldova’s 2011 Freedom House independent media score also<br />

improved to 5.50 from 5.75 in 2010. The Independent <strong>Journal</strong>ism Center in Moldova reported that the<br />

broadcast media in the fall 2010 parliamentary election was “more objective than in previous<br />

campaigns.” 23<br />

Unfortunately, the relevance <strong>of</strong> a freer media to Moldovans is far less clear. For example, trust in the<br />

mass media increased from 51.3% in the July 2009 BPO poll to 61.5% in the November 2009 poll, the first<br />

BPO poll conducted under the new AEI government. Yet, a year later in November 2010 trust in the<br />

media had slipped back to 56.8%, which exactly equals the numerical average for public trust in the<br />

media compiled by BPO polls for the entire Voronin era despite a less biased media. 24 A year later, in the<br />

November 2011 BPO poll, media trust was still only 57.3%. 25 Equally revealing, BPO polls consistently<br />

show that the most trusted and popular source <strong>of</strong> information for Moldovans is television, far in front <strong>of</strong><br />

the radio, newspapers, and the fast growing number <strong>of</strong> internet users. 26 During both Voronin’s second<br />

term in <strong>of</strong>fice and the current AEI governance, Moldova 1 and Prime TV have remained by far Moldova’s<br />

two most popular television channels for BPO respondents for whom television is a major source <strong>of</strong><br />

information. Both channels previously favored the Communists, especially Moldova 1, when Voronin<br />

was at the helm, but since have adopted a less biased view due to the changing political times. 27 Based<br />

partly on the above, there seems little to indicate a sustained public appreciation <strong>of</strong> increased media<br />

freedom by Moldovan, so far. Of course, with the Communists out <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice since the July 2009<br />

parliamentary election, they have not been able to utilize the mass media to their advantage. No doubt,<br />

this partly accounted for their slip in overall support from 45 to 40 percent <strong>of</strong> the total vote in the<br />

November 2010 elections. Yet, as RWB summed up the situation, “Relations between the media and the<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

© Copyright Mikes International 2001-2012 72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!