Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
47<br />
Charge B. That the Mayor never sought to com<br />
mand the mob, nor did he issue any order.<br />
Colonel Sever (No. XL) expressly says, "com<br />
manding them to disperse and go peaceably<br />
homes<br />
"<br />
to their<br />
; and the words and spirit of the other docu<br />
ments (Nos. IX., X., &c.) fully bear out this expres<br />
sion. In the Liberator of November, 1835, "Another<br />
Abolitionist" says, "He declared that the law should<br />
be supported, if it cost him his life, and ordered them<br />
[the rabble] to disperse." Mr. Phillips (No. II.) says,<br />
"Had he issued one command, even one that was<br />
disobeyed, I should have honored him." I hereby<br />
call on Mr. Phillips publicly to make good this his<br />
written promise !<br />
Charge C. That he consented, if he did not assist,<br />
at tearing down the Antistavery sign and throwing it<br />
to the mob, to propitiate its rage.<br />
That the sign was taken down and thrown to the<br />
mob and broken up are facts needing no proof;<br />
that the Mayor ordered the sign to be taken down I<br />
do not deny, for he expressly says, "I sent a person<br />
to see if this sign could be taken into the room from<br />
the window," &c. (No. Y. page 20); but that he or<br />
dered it thrown to the mob, or consented thereto, is<br />
a petty and malignant supposition which can only<br />
be admitted on the most emphatic evidence. The<br />
newspaper sentences quoted<br />
in No. IV. are no evi<br />
dence ; such reports are only hearsay. The testi<br />
mony of Mr. L. B. Marsh does not touch the point.<br />
Even supposing that Mr. Harry Williams removed<br />
the sign and spoke those exact words, they do not<br />
convey the meaning that the Mayor<br />
ordered the