20.10.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

of Mayor Lyman s conduct,&quot; which can mean<br />

nothing less than that Mr. Phillips is right<br />

in his<br />

charges, A to F inclusive !<br />

I wish Mr. Garrison could be kept out of this part<br />

of the discussion. He has shown himself a notable<br />

man, perhaps even a great one. He had a high and<br />

noble idea which was pursued, with an almost heroic<br />

constancy, to its triumph.<br />

No one can be surprised that Mr. Garrison felt in<br />

dignant, after his experience in the riot. Nothing<br />

can be more annoying, or harder to bear, than that<br />

mingling of the tragic<br />

and the ludicrous which ac<br />

companies maltreatment by a cowardly<br />

and mis<br />

chievous mob. But he should not vent his feelings<br />

on the magistrate who honestly defended him ; or<br />

out unnecessary delay, any two of the magistrates or officers aforesaid<br />

may require the aid of a sufficient number of persons, in arms or other<br />

wise, and may proceed to take such measures as in the judgment of such<br />

two magistrates or officers are expedient to disperse said tumultuous as<br />

sembly, and to seize and secure the persons composing the same ; and if<br />

any such persons, or any other person then being present, as spectators<br />

or otherwise, shall be killed or wounded by reason of the efforts of said two<br />

magistrates or officers to disperse said assembly, said officers and magis<br />

trates shall, as also persons acting under their direction, be held guiltless<br />

and justified in law ; but if said magistrates or officers are killed, the<br />

rioters shall be answerable therefor.<br />

Approved by the Lieutenant-Governor^ April 8, 1835.<br />

By comparing the above with the Riot Act, it will be seen that the<br />

words of the two are almost identical, and as the Riot Act was in 1835 a<br />

part of our common law, this act is plainly nothing more than an explicit<br />

statement of the common law doctrine on the subject.<br />

It is undoubtedly this act which is referred to by<br />

the Liberator (page 29) ;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

Abolitionist in<br />

but he does not make clear what use the Mayor<br />

could make of the act, since he already had asked the aid of good<br />

citizens, had requested and commanded the crowd to disperse, and had<br />

personally, and with his the mob.<br />

constables, struggled as hard as he could with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!