Best Practices for the Reduction of Air Emissions From Construction ...

CHEMINFO
25. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Rule 426 – Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified
Paving Materials, revised September, 1999.
26. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Rule 800 – Fugitive Dust Requirements for
Control of Fine Particulate Matter (PM-10), revised November, 1996.
27. Innovative Management Solutions Inc., NMS Guide to Environmentally Responsible
Specifications for New Construction and Renovations, February, 2000.
28. Kern County Air Pollution Control District, Cutback, Slow Cure & Emulsified Asphalt Paving
and Maintenance Operations, amended March, 1996.
29. Kern County Air Pollution Control District, Fugitive Dust, amended September, 1995.
30. Manitoba Floodway Expansion Authority, Guidelines for the Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Red River Floodway Expansion Project, February, 2004.
31. Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, A Guide for Reducing Air Pollution from
Spray Coating Operations – Save Money and Prevent Air Pollution.
32. Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Guidance for Filling-out An Application
for an Earthmoving Project.
33. Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Control Fugitive Dust at Construction
Projects – Prepare Your Site for a Compliance Inspection.
34. Maricopa County, Rule 310.01 – Fugitive Dust from Open Areas, Vacant Lots, Unpaved Parking
Lots, and Unpaved Roadways, revised February, 2000.
35. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Managing Fugitive Dust – A Guide for
Compliance with the Air Regulatory Requirements for Particulate Matter Generation, March,
2003.
36. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Natural Resources and Environmental
Protection Act, amended July, 1998.
37. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, Rule 1103 – Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt,
December, 1994.
38. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, Rule 471 - Asphalt Roofing Operations,
amended January, 1994.
39. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, Rule 425 – Use of Cutback Asphalt, revised
March, 1997.
40. Montreal Urban Community, Codification Administrative Des Règlements 90, 90-1, 90-2, 90-3,
90-4, 90-5 et 90-6. Règlement 90 – Règlement Relatif à l’assainissement de l’air et remplaçant
les Règlements 44 et 44-1 de la Communauté.
41. National Paints and Coatings Association, Issue Backgrounder – The Paint and Coatings
Industry Addresses Spray Paint Issues, June, 2000.
42. National Park Service, Envirofacts – Waste Paint/Coatings Management, March, 1999.
43. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection – Bureau of Air Pollution Control, Surface Area
Disturbance Permit Dust Control Plan Preparation Guidelines, October, 2002.
44. Northcutt, Greg., Working with Dirt When the Wind Blows, published in Grading & Excavation
Contractor.
45. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Engineering Guide #57, revised April 1996.
46. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Pollution Prevention in Painting and Coating
Operations, September, 1994.
47. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Pollution Prevention Opportunities for
Painting & Coating Operations, May, 1997.
48. Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, Dust Control Methods for Landscaping.
49. Pinal County Air Quality Control District, Article 3 – Construction Sites and Earthmoving
Activities – Fugitive Dust, December, 2002.
50. Placer County Air Pollution Control District, Rule 217 – Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving
Materials, revised September, 1990.
Best Practices for the Reduction of Air Emissions From Construction and Demolition Activities 47