24.10.2013 Views

An assessment of local fisheries in Diego-Suarez Bay, Madagascar

An assessment of local fisheries in Diego-Suarez Bay, Madagascar

An assessment of local fisheries in Diego-Suarez Bay, Madagascar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3. Fishermen’s op<strong>in</strong>ion on resource use <strong>in</strong> <strong>Diego</strong>-<strong>Suarez</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> (n=40)<br />

Question<br />

Fish<strong>in</strong>g should be restricted to specific areas 22 28 11 39 0<br />

Use fish<strong>in</strong>g nets with > 4 cm mesh 33 44 17 6 0<br />

Communities should work together on resource use 39 39 11 11 0<br />

Deforestation <strong>in</strong> coastal areas should be stopped 50 39 0 6 6<br />

Only catch large fish 50 44 6 0 0<br />

Do noth<strong>in</strong>g specific, there is enough fish 0 56 6 33 6<br />

Fish on certa<strong>in</strong> days 22 61 6 6 6<br />

A fisherman should decide himself how much fish he catches 22 56 11 11 0<br />

Pray or ask ancestors for more fish 11 44 28 17 0<br />

The government <strong>in</strong> <strong>Diego</strong> should control fish catch size 6 33 33 17 11<br />

Eat less fish 33 17 33 6 11<br />

Only catch certa<strong>in</strong> fish species 17 39 28 17 0<br />

Village chief should control the size <strong>of</strong> fish catches 28 56 11 0 6<br />

Get more tourists to the bay as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come 39 44 6 11 0<br />

In response to whether fish<strong>in</strong>g has an impact on the environment 78% <strong>of</strong> fishermen said it did have an<br />

impact and 28% said it had no impact. The majority <strong>of</strong> fishermen stated that there were fadys associated<br />

with fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Diego</strong>-<strong>Suarez</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> (71%).<br />

Responses to questions on how best to ensure the availability <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e resources for future generations<br />

varied with no outstand<strong>in</strong>g universal answer for each question (table 3). The majority <strong>of</strong> people strongly<br />

agreed that deforestation <strong>in</strong> coastal areas should be stopped and only large fish should be caught. The<br />

greater part <strong>of</strong> fishermen agreed that: fish<strong>in</strong>g nets with > 4 cm mesh should be used; noth<strong>in</strong>g specific<br />

should be done as there is enough fish; only go out fish<strong>in</strong>g on certa<strong>in</strong> days; a fisherman should decide<br />

himself how much fish he catches; pray or ask ancestors for more fish; only certa<strong>in</strong> fish species should be<br />

caught; the village chief should control the size <strong>of</strong> fish catches, communities should work together on<br />

resource use and more tourists should be taken to the bay as an alternative source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come. Most<br />

disagreed that fish<strong>in</strong>g should be restricted to specific areas. There was a split majority op<strong>in</strong>ion on two<br />

questions: 1. The government <strong>in</strong> <strong>Diego</strong> should control fish catch size (33% agree and neutral) and 2. Eat<br />

less fish (33% strongly agree and neutral), eat<strong>in</strong>g more zebu (a species <strong>of</strong> domestic tropical cattle) was<br />

mentioned by some fishermen as an alternative.<br />

3.2 Resource Status and visual observations<br />

3.2.1 L<strong>in</strong>e Intercept Transect (LIT)<br />

The relationship between mean hard coral cover and number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels at each sector (figure 8)<br />

was tested us<strong>in</strong>g Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. There was no association between hard coral<br />

cover and number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels (rs = 0.414, n=17, p > 0.05).<br />

3.2.2 Underwater Visual Census (UVC)<br />

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was also used to test if there was an association between mean<br />

fish biomass vs. number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels, mean fish species richness vs. number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels and<br />

mean number <strong>of</strong> fish counted vs. number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels (fish biomass, mean fish species richness and<br />

mean number <strong>of</strong> fish counted data only available from January 2008 to December 2008 for sectors 0-5,<br />

Nosy Fano, Nosy Koba and Nosy Langoro). There was an association between mean fish biomass vs.<br />

number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels (rs = 0.708, n = 9, p < 0.05) (figure 9). However no association was found for<br />

the other two tests (fish species richness vs. number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels, rs = 0.225, n = 9, p > 0.05; mean<br />

number <strong>of</strong> fish counted vs. number <strong>of</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g vessels rs = 0.225, n = 9, p > 0.05).<br />

Strongly<br />

agree<br />

Agree<br />

Neutral<br />

Disagree<br />

Strongly<br />

disagree<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!