25.10.2013 Views

Biophysical Survey of Mafia Island Marine Reserves

Biophysical Survey of Mafia Island Marine Reserves

Biophysical Survey of Mafia Island Marine Reserves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research<br />

REPORT 128<br />

A biophysical survey <strong>of</strong> three new marine reserves in<br />

<strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, Tanzania<br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve, Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong><br />

Reserve, and Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve<br />

Jones, L. and Fanning, E. (Eds)<br />

Frontier Tanzania<br />

April 2010


Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research<br />

REPORT 128<br />

A biophysical survey <strong>of</strong> three new marine reserves in<br />

<strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, Tanzania<br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve, Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong><br />

Reserve, and Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve<br />

<strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Parks<br />

Jones L., & Fanning, E., (eds)<br />

Technical report<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources and<br />

Tourism, Tanzania<br />

Wildlife Division<br />

2010<br />

Frontier-Tanzania<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Dar es Salaam<br />

Society for Environmental Exploration


Suggested Technical Report citation:<br />

Frontier Tanzania (2010). A biophysical survey <strong>of</strong> three new marine reserves in <strong>Mafia</strong><br />

<strong>Island</strong>, Tanzania. Jones, L., and Fanning, E. (Eds.) Frontier Tanzania Environmental<br />

Research Report 128. The Society for Environmental Exploration, London, UK, <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong><br />

<strong>Marine</strong> Parks, The University <strong>of</strong> Dar es Salaam.<br />

The Frontier-Tanzania Environmental Research Report Series is published by:<br />

The Society for Environmental Exploration<br />

50-52 Rivington Street<br />

London, EC2A 3QP<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tel: +44 (0)20 7613 2422<br />

Fax: +44 (0)20 7613 2992<br />

Email: research@frontier.ac.uk<br />

Web Page: www.frontier.ac.uk<br />

Frontier-Tanzania Environmental Research (FTER)<br />

ISSN 1479-1161 (Print)<br />

ISSN 1748-3670 (Online)<br />

ISSN 1748-5124 (CD-ROM)


Acknowledgements<br />

The research for this report was carried out by Frontier Tanzania <strong>Marine</strong> Project on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Marine</strong> Parks and <strong>Reserves</strong> Unit, Tanzania, between November 2008 and<br />

June 2009. The collection <strong>of</strong> data was made possible by the assistance and contributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Frontier conservation volunteers and staff.


Executive Summary<br />

Major Findings<br />

• Presence <strong>of</strong> juvenile black tip sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) in shallow<br />

lagoon areas at Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (SIMR).<br />

• Green turtle (Chelonia mydas) present at SIMR and Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong><br />

Reserve (NIMR). SIMR is potentially a breeding and nesting site for green turtle<br />

based on observations <strong>of</strong> turtle behaviour, and anecdotal evidence from other<br />

conservation organisations operating in the area.<br />

• Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate) have been recorded as present at both<br />

NIMR and SIMR.<br />

• The seagrass beds at MBIMR appear to provide a particularly rich and diverse<br />

ecosystem. Observations <strong>of</strong> invertebrates and fish present have shown high<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> important commercial and ecological species.<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> an extensive octopus fishery at NIMR.<br />

• Commercial diving for Spiny Lobster (Panulirus spp.) at Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong><br />

Reserve (MBIMR) and SIMR.<br />

• Gastropod harvest for the marine curio trade at all three reserves.<br />

• Minor settlement on Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> that is engaged in commercial and subsistence<br />

fishing as well as providing a stop <strong>of</strong>f for trading, and a safe haven for passing<br />

vessels.<br />

• Rapid coastal erosion <strong>of</strong> Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

• Opportunity for revisions to the reserve boundaries in order to afford better<br />

protection for areas <strong>of</strong> high ecologically importance.<br />

Recommendations<br />

o SIMR is a key nursery for Elasmobranch species that are under threat both locally<br />

and worldwide. Blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) are present at high<br />

density in the sandy shallows surrounding the island. In addition, there have been<br />

unconfirmed sightings <strong>of</strong> lesser guitar fish (Rhinobatus annulatus) or sandshark<br />

juveniles. Blue spot stingrays (Dasyati kuhulii) are also abundant. Further studies


are recommended in order to determine the importance <strong>of</strong> the C. melanopterus<br />

nursery and estimate recruitment and survival levels.<br />

o Hawksbill and green turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata and Chelonia mydas) have<br />

been observed within SIMR and NIMR. At some sites in SIMR C. mydas have<br />

been observed frequently, with some very large individuals recorded as being near<br />

the maximum size for the species. Evidence from in-water observations, and<br />

information from other conservation organisations operating in the area, suggests<br />

that SIMR is a breeding and potential nesting site for C. mydas. Both species are<br />

listed on the IUCN red list (C. mydas as Endangered and E. imbricata as<br />

Critically Endangered). In order to establish whether the turtles breed at these<br />

sites, a survey <strong>of</strong> nesting signs, courtship and nesting behaviour is required, in<br />

addition to a population census.<br />

o All three reserve areas have extensive seagrass beds. The shallow beds at MBIMR<br />

exhibit particularly high biodiversity. These habitats are key nurseries and feeding<br />

grounds for many fish species. They are crucial for any recovery <strong>of</strong> the dugong<br />

(Dugong dugong) population, and are also <strong>of</strong> great importance to mollusc<br />

populations such as the edible sea cucumbers e.g. Holothuria edulis and tiger<br />

cowrie (Cypraea tigris).<br />

o MBIMR supports a small commercial operation, fishing for lobster (Palunirus<br />

spp). This, and other fishing activities, maintains a small camp <strong>of</strong> fishers at most<br />

times <strong>of</strong> the year. The commercial lobster diving operation operates using local<br />

labour and a compressor in situ. Further work is required to assess both the<br />

sustainability in terms <strong>of</strong> yield and renewal rates, and the economic and social<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> this operation.<br />

o Observations made on catch levels at NIMR suggest that fishers harvest octopus<br />

at a very high rate, which is possibly above sustainable yield levels. In addition,<br />

many other mollusc species are harvested for both food and the curio trade. The<br />

octopus fishery is an important source <strong>of</strong> revenue for <strong>Mafia</strong>; however the high


price it fetches may be contributing to over-fishing. Stock assessment is required<br />

to ascertain whether catch levels are at sustainable maximum yields, and to ensure<br />

that harvest levels do not exceed recruitment levels. In addition, assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ecological impacts <strong>of</strong> fishing methods is needed to ensure habitat damage is not<br />

occurring.<br />

o The <strong>Island</strong> <strong>of</strong> Nyororo and its sub-tidal habitats have large numbers <strong>of</strong> grassroots<br />

stakeholders. Its position as a stop <strong>of</strong>f and trading post between <strong>Mafia</strong> and the<br />

mainland makes it likely to be <strong>of</strong> high importance to a much wider group than<br />

those who stay there and their dependants. A wide and comprehensive stakeholder<br />

analysis is required to determine both the value and impacts <strong>of</strong> this settlement.<br />

This will enable effective management <strong>of</strong> the reserve area, whilst maintaining the<br />

traditional important role Nyororo plays in the sea trading route between <strong>Mafia</strong><br />

and the mainland. We recommend that the welfare <strong>of</strong> these stakeholders is taken<br />

into account during the planning process to ensure that management actions are<br />

both effective and inclusive.<br />

o Ecologically and commercially valuable gastropods such as the triton trumpet<br />

shell (Charonia tritonis) and bullmouth helmet shell (Cypreacassis rufa) are<br />

present on both NIMR and MBIMR. There is evidence that these are harvested<br />

along with C. tigris for the trade in marine curios. C. tritonis and C.tigris are<br />

listed by CITES as banned for international trade. Further research needs to be<br />

undertaken to establish appropriate management strategies.<br />

o In several cases the reserve areas are delineated in such a way as to omit areas <strong>of</strong><br />

high ecological importance such as reef crests and portions <strong>of</strong> the islands. This is<br />

especially the case at MBIMR and SIMR. It is advised that the gazettements are<br />

revised to allow for effective management and to ensure that areas <strong>of</strong> high<br />

ecological importance are adequately protected.


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

II. STUDY SITES<br />

III. METHODS<br />

A. Field Methods<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

a) Image processing methodology<br />

b) Habitat mapping using low resolution satellite images<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis<br />

B. Data Analysis<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis


IV. RESULTS<br />

A. Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (NIMR)<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis<br />

B. Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (SIMR)<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

a) Substrate composition<br />

b) Benthic composition<br />

c) Invertebrate abundance<br />

d) Fish abundance<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis


C. Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (MBIMR)<br />

V. DISCUSSION<br />

VI. APPENDICES<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

a) Substrate composition<br />

b) Benthic composition<br />

c) Invertebrate abundance<br />

d) Fish abundance<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis<br />

A. Fish Species List


I. INTRODUCTION<br />

Project Aim<br />

To conduct biophysical surveys <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Reserves</strong> (MIMRs) that will<br />

provide the basis on which management objectives can be formulated.<br />

Objectives<br />

• Describe the structure <strong>of</strong> the reefs, benthic cover, seagrass beds, marine fauna<br />

and flora<br />

• Identify sites <strong>of</strong> high biodiversity and/or those under threat<br />

• Detail the current type and level <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the reefs and associated habitats within<br />

the MIMRs and buffer zones<br />

• Identify any potential use conflicts and potentially under-utilised resources<br />

• Give a general biophysical description <strong>of</strong> the MIMRs that includes the coastline<br />

characteristics, beach, and depth pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

• Provide maps that show depth pr<strong>of</strong>iles, major biophysical features, and core<br />

zones for each reserve area<br />

• Provide data and advice to the <strong>Marine</strong> Parks and <strong>Reserves</strong> Unit which is<br />

contributory to the production <strong>of</strong> a GIS database and maps.<br />

• Identify and conduct a preliminary analysis <strong>of</strong> major stakeholder groups <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Outcomes<br />

MIMRs, including assessments <strong>of</strong> any fish catch data that is made available by<br />

the <strong>Mafia</strong> Fisheries Office.<br />

• A report detailing biological and ecological analysis <strong>of</strong> the resources within the<br />

MIMRs and the pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> all three areas within the MIMRs<br />

• Recommendations for management interventions that will contribute to effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the MIMRs<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> permanent monitoring sites and development <strong>of</strong> indicators that<br />

will enable ongoing biological and ecological monitoring <strong>of</strong> the MIMRs<br />

• Production <strong>of</strong> maps showing resources bases within the MIMRs.


II. STUDY SITES<br />

The <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Reserves</strong> are located in <strong>Mafia</strong> District, Tanzania, to the North-<br />

west <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. They are situated in the Western Indian Ocean in the shallow<br />

stretch <strong>of</strong> water that separates <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong> from the mainland <strong>of</strong> Tanzania,<br />

approximately 35km <strong>of</strong>f the Tanzanian coast. This area is located in the mouth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rufiji delta, and is therefore heavily influenced by the outflow from this major river<br />

system. It is also affected by the East African Current and both the north-eastern and<br />

south-western monsoons. The NE monsoon (Kaskazi) runs from November to March and<br />

brings strong northerly winds, which is followed later in the year by a period <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

rains which run until May. The wind direction is then reversed with the coming <strong>of</strong> the SE<br />

monsoon (Kusi) which blows from June to October and brings steady winds and good<br />

weather. Another period <strong>of</strong> shorter rains also follows this monsoon. The East Africa<br />

current is a major influencing factor on the area, and runs approximately south to north.<br />

The current can flow at between 1 and 4 knots, depending on physical conditions, water<br />

depth and season.<br />

Tides are another important factor in the physical makeup <strong>of</strong> the reserves. Tides in this<br />

region are mixed semi-diurnal, and average spring tidal range is approximately 3-4m,<br />

varying throughout the year. Currents are heavily influenced around the reserves by tidal<br />

state, with slack water negating currents to a negligible amount, and other states<br />

magnifying them to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 2-3kts in some cases. There is some evidence to<br />

suggest that tides were exceptionally high throughout January and February 2009, to the<br />

extent that the islands were washed over in parts. These high tides are almost certainly<br />

responsible for the morphology <strong>of</strong> the steep beaches that characterise the two smallest<br />

islands. Low tides expose shallow reef flat and sea grass areas to view around both<br />

Shungimbili and Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong>s.


The reserves were established under the Tanzanian <strong>Marine</strong> Parks and <strong>Reserves</strong> Act on the<br />

2 nd March 2007. There are three distinct areas included in this declaration based around<br />

the islands <strong>of</strong> Nyororo, Shungimbili, and Mbarakuni. Although the three marine reserves<br />

had been established in law, no management <strong>of</strong> the reserves had been implemented at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (NIMR) is the most northerly <strong>of</strong> the three reserves. It<br />

also has the greatest total area, and contains the largest <strong>of</strong> the three islands. The island is<br />

located 35km form the mainland and 21km from <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. The reserve encompasses<br />

all water and land areas contained within the following points:<br />

1) Lat 7° 35’ 24”S, Long 39° 41’ 44”E<br />

2) Lat 7° 36’ 36”S, Long 39° 41’ 44”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 36’ 36”S, Long 39° 44’ 06”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 39’ 14”S, Long 39° 43’ 13”E<br />

5) Lat 7° 38’ 35”S, Long 39° 40’ 36”E<br />

6) Lat 7° 38’ 00”S, Long 39° 40’ 30”E<br />

7) Lat 7° 36’ 42”S, Long 39° 40’ 54”E<br />

8) Lat 7° 35’ 47”S, Long 39° 40’ 24”E<br />

The area contained within the reserves extends to 13km² and includes extensive areas <strong>of</strong><br />

seagrass, coral reef and other habitats, in addition to the island <strong>of</strong> Nyororo itself. The<br />

island is 1.5km in length and 0.8km in width. In common with <strong>Mafia</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, it is<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> coral rag and sand sediments.<br />

Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (SIMR) is the second largest island, and thus has the<br />

second largest reserve surrounding it at approximately 4.2km². The island itself sits<br />

roughly 13km from the <strong>Mafia</strong> coast, and is made up <strong>of</strong> a terrestrial environment<br />

approximately 1km by 0.25km. It is characterised by steep sandy beaches around the<br />

southern tip and a gently sloping rock platform which dominates the northern part,<br />

cutting through the island from east to west. Vegetation on the island follows typical<br />

succession, with trees dominating the centre, and small shrubs and vines towards the<br />

fringes. The western side <strong>of</strong> Shungimbili is characterised by many fallen trees lying into


the surf, caused by the heavy erosion brought on by high spring tides. The reef lies in a<br />

line along the north-eastern and eastern sides <strong>of</strong> the island, and sea grass beds are found<br />

in both shallow and deeper water sites around the island.<br />

The marine reserve encompasses the following points:<br />

1) Lat 7° 40’ 36”S, Long 39° 41’ 20”E<br />

2) Lat 7° 41’ 20”S, Long 39° 42’ 04”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 42’ 22”S, Long 39° 40’ 52”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 41’ 41”S, Long 39° 40’ 18”E<br />

Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (MBIMR) is both the smallest land area and reserve,<br />

and is closest to <strong>Mafia</strong> at 7.4km. The reserve itself covers an area <strong>of</strong> roughly 3.8km²,<br />

while the terrestrial environment is confined to an area 0.5km by 0.5km. Steep beaches<br />

again abound here, and there is also a similar rock platform to that found on Shungimbili<br />

<strong>Island</strong> along the northern side. Sandbar and rock platform areas become obvious at low<br />

tide, when they are exposed to view. The reef lies on the north and eastern side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

island. Extensive areas <strong>of</strong> shallow seagrass beds are found between the reef and the<br />

island.<br />

The reserve at Mbarakuni is included in the following points:<br />

1) Lat 7° 42’ 30”S, Long 39° 44’ 13”E<br />

2) Lat 7° 42’ 30”S, Long 39° 45’ 42”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 43’ 28”S, Long 39° 45’ 42”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 43’ 28”S, Long 39° 45’ 42”E<br />

5) Lat 7° 43’ 28”S, Long 39° 44’ 13”E


III. METHODS<br />

A. Field Methods<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

a) Patch Mosaic Creation Methodology<br />

Delineation <strong>of</strong> Patch Mosaic<br />

Patch mosaics, suitable for GIS manipulation, were created from satellite images<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three marine reserve sites using an iterative method combining four main<br />

processes. Firstly, the original image was colour enhanced to improve clarity for visual<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> patch types and boundaries. Secondly, prototype patch boundaries were<br />

created using visual indications <strong>of</strong> spectral boundaries that were apparent on the<br />

improved image (Figure 1a). This was used to direct the locations selected for the ground<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>ing methodologies described below. Once collected, ground pro<strong>of</strong>ing data was<br />

overlaid on the image to build a patch mosaic by inference <strong>of</strong> patch characteristics<br />

(Figure 1b).<br />

Figure 1. a) Prototype patch boundaries and b) Patch mosaic created by inference <strong>of</strong> patch characteristics<br />

created based on ground pro<strong>of</strong>ing data.


Occasionally, pro<strong>of</strong>ing did not confirm either patch boundaries or patch type.<br />

Consequently, patch types and boundaries were revised. This then directed the selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> locations for further pro<strong>of</strong>ing. This process was repeated until a consensus was<br />

reached; the image was then processed to create a final patch mosaic. Each patch was<br />

assigned a colour to denote the patch type, finally resulting in the delineation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

habitat present in each marine reserve area. It should be noted that a high resolution<br />

satellite image was only available for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this report for NIMR. The images<br />

used for the basis <strong>of</strong> the patch mosaic creation for SIMR and MBIMR were <strong>of</strong> far lower<br />

resolution.<br />

Ground Pro<strong>of</strong>ing Methodology (High Resolution Satellite Image - NIMR)<br />

Ground pro<strong>of</strong>ing transects perpendicular to a series <strong>of</strong> biophysical features were<br />

conducted by snorkel and SCUBA diving. These were designed to provide habitat cross<br />

sections and geo-referenced patch boundaries which could be overlaid onto the high<br />

resolution satellite image. Along these transects, benthic composition data was collected<br />

(Table 2). For SCUBA, benthic composition was recorded every two meters. For snorkel,<br />

percentage composition was recorded for each habitat patch transversed. Habitat patches<br />

were then created and categorised according to the habitat categories described in<br />

Appendix 1. All transects were GPS tracked so they could be overlaid onto the image.<br />

Table 1. A sample <strong>of</strong> dive transect data including the prescribed habitat categories (Appendix 1) and<br />

benthic cover types (Table 2).<br />

TRANSECT 1<br />

Meters 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24<br />

Cover Type SC SC SC HM RK SC SC HM MA MA HCBR HCBR HCBR<br />

Habitat Type REEF SLOPE<br />

ALGAL<br />

RIDGE ACROPORA COMM<br />

Meters 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50<br />

Cover Type SG SG SG SA SG SG SG SG SG MA SA RB SA<br />

Habitat Type<br />

SEAGRASS<br />

BEDS LAGOONAL -<br />

Additional data were collected by spot checks using snorkel, SCUBA and<br />

percentage composition data using manta tows. Also, benthic composition data were used<br />

from benthic composition data collected from the species survey section <strong>of</strong> this report.


Ground Pro<strong>of</strong>ing Methodology (Low Resolution Satellite Images – SIMR and MBIMR)<br />

A GPS SMB module was used to record spot feature locations and also tracks<br />

along linear features using SCUBA and snorkel. This provided patch boundary locations<br />

that were not apparent on the low resolution image. GPS spot and track information were<br />

then uploaded onto Garmin Mapsource (GM) ready for patch mosaic creation. Additional<br />

data were collected by spot checks using snorkel, SCUBA and percentage composition<br />

data using manta tows. Also, benthic composition data were used from benthic<br />

composition data collected from the species survey section <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />

Patch Mosaic Creation<br />

The GPS information was overlaid onto a low resolution Google Earth image<br />

from GM to confirm size and orientation <strong>of</strong> patch features. Once the GPS information<br />

was aligned with the satellite image, the resulting image was used as the basis on which<br />

to build a final patch mosaic (Figure 2) using benthic composition (Table 2) and habitat<br />

categories (Appendix 1).<br />

Figure 2. Mosaic creation using Google Earth Image and GPS track, point and transect information.


2. Coral Reef Habitats<br />

Benthic Composition<br />

Benthic composition data were collected in conjunction with reef fish and<br />

invertebrate abundance. <strong>Survey</strong>ors recorded the benthic or substrate type every 0.5m<br />

starting at 0.5m along a 25m transect set at a constant depth. This resulted in the<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> 50 points per transect. Transects were laid along the reef at various depths<br />

from 4 to 12 m. Depths depended on the topography <strong>of</strong> individual reefs. The total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> surveys carried out depended on the extent <strong>of</strong> the reef, but at least four transects per<br />

depth were laid in each reef habitat assessed at a minimum <strong>of</strong> four sites. Two or more<br />

depths were surveyed for each reef habitat. GPS positions were taken for the entry points<br />

for all transect survey dives. Composition data were collected using the categories listed<br />

below in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Benthic composition categories and associated codes<br />

Category Code Category Code<br />

HARD CORAL: ALGAE<br />

Branching HCBR Turf Algae - Rubble TARK<br />

Columnar HCC Turf algae - Rock TARB<br />

Plate HCP Nutrient Indicator Algae NIA<br />

Encrusting HCE Coralline algae CCA<br />

Foliaceous HCF Macroalgae MA<br />

Massive HCM ABIOTIC<br />

Sub-massive HCSM Sand SA<br />

Solitary HCS Rubble RB<br />

Bleached Coral BL Rock RK<br />

OTHER BIOTIC: Silt ST<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t coral SC Dead coral DC<br />

Sponge SP<br />

Other Benthic Organisms OBO Other OT<br />

Seagrass SG


Invertebrate Abundance<br />

Invertebrate abundance was assessed alongside benthic composition and reef fish<br />

abundance. <strong>Survey</strong>ors recorded the number <strong>of</strong> target invertebrates within a 5m box along<br />

a 25m transect set at a constant depth. Invertebrate abundance was collected using the<br />

categories listed below in Table 3.<br />

Table 3. Invertebrate species categories used for abundance data collection<br />

Common Name Latin Name<br />

DIADEMA Gernera: Diadema spp.<br />

OTHER URCHINS Class: Echinoidea<br />

EDIBLE SEA CUCUMBER<br />

Six species in the familes Holothuridae spp.and<br />

Stichopodidae spp.<br />

NON TARGET CUCUMBER All other species <strong>of</strong> sea cucumbers<br />

OCTOPUS Order: Octopoda<br />

SQUID/CUTTLEFISH Order: Teuthoidea / Sepiidea<br />

NUDIBRANCH Order: Nudibranchia<br />

LOBSTER Family: Palinuridae<br />

CROWN OF THORN Acanthaster planci<br />

OTHER STARFISH Class: Asteroidea<br />

GIANT CLAM Family: Tridacnidae<br />

COWRIE Family: Cypraeidae<br />

TRITON TRUMPET SHELL Species: Charonia tritonis<br />

BULL MOUTH HELMET SHELL Species: Cypraecassis rufa<br />

Reef Fish Abundance<br />

DRUPELLA Genera: Drupella<br />

Reef fish abundance data were collected in conjunction with benthic composition<br />

and invertebrate abundance. <strong>Survey</strong>ors recorded the number <strong>of</strong> target reef fish within a<br />

5m box along a 25m transect set at a constant depth. Transects were laid at various depths<br />

from 4 to 12 m. <strong>Survey</strong> depths depended on the topography <strong>of</strong> individual reefs. Fish<br />

abundance data were collected during the laying <strong>of</strong> the transect line to minimise


disturbance. Where this was not possible surveyors waited for 5 minutes away from the<br />

transect in order to allow fish to return. Abundance <strong>of</strong> fish was recorded for the species<br />

listed in Table 4.<br />

Table 4. Fish species list used for collection <strong>of</strong> abundance data collection.<br />

Common name Latin name Common name Latin name<br />

BUTTERLYFISH ANGELFISH<br />

Lined Butterflyfish Chaetodon lineolatus Three spot Angelfish Apolemichthys trimaculatus<br />

Saddleback Butterflyfish Chaetodon falcula Two-spined / Dusky<br />

Angelfish<br />

Centropyge bispinosus<br />

Black-backed Butterflyfish Chaetodon melannotus Regal Angelfish Pygoplites diacanthus<br />

Vagabond Butterflyfish Chaetodon vagabundus Emperor Angelfish Pomacanthus imperator<br />

Threadfin Butterflyfish Chaetodon auriga Semicircle angelfish Pomacanthus semicirculatus<br />

Teardrop Butterflyfish Chaetodon unimaculatus Ear-spot angelfish Pomacanthus chrysurus<br />

Bennett’s Butterflyfish Chaetodon bennetti Yellowbar angelfish Pomacanthus maculosus<br />

Zanzibar Butterflyfish Chaetodon zanzibariensis SURGEONFISH<br />

Crown Butterflyfish Chaetodon paucifasciatus Moorish Idol Zanclus cornutus<br />

Klein’s Butterflyfish Chaetodon kleinii Brushtail tang Zebrasoma scopes<br />

Yellowhead Butterflyfish Chaetodon xanthocephalus Convict surgeonfish Acanthus triostegus<br />

Raccoon Butterflyfish Chaetodon lunula Powder-blue surgeonfish Acanthurus leucosternon<br />

Spotted Butterflyfish Chaetodon guttatissimus Palette surgeonfish Paracanthus hepatus<br />

Somali Butterflyfish Chaetodon leucopleura Black surgeonfish Acanthurus gahhm<br />

Redfin Butterflyfish Chaetodon trifasciatus Thompson’s surgeonfish Acanthurus thompsoni<br />

Meyer’s Butterflyfish Chaetodon meyeri Lietenant surgeonfish Acanthurus tennenti<br />

Chevroned Butterflyfish Chaetodon trifascialus Striped bristletooth Ctenochaetus striatus<br />

Blackburn’s Butterflyfish Chaetodon blackburni Goldring bristletooth Ctenochaetus strigosus<br />

Black Pyramid Butterflyfish Hemitaurichthys zoster Sailfin Tang Zerasoma desjardinii<br />

Big Long-nosed<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Forcipiger longirostris Two spot bristletooth Ctenochaetus binotatus<br />

Longfin Bannerfish Heniochus acuminatus GOATFISH<br />

Masked Bannerfish Heniochus monoceros Yellowsaddle goatfish Parupeneus cyclostomus<br />

WRASSE Longbarbel goatfish Parupeneus macronema<br />

Slingjaw wrasse Epibulus insidiator Dash-and-dot goatfish Parupeneus barberinus<br />

Checkerboard wrasse Haliochoeres hortulanus TRIGGERFISH Balistidae<br />

Indian Ocean Bird wrasse Gomphosus caeruleus GROUPERS Serranidae<br />

Goldbar wrasse Thalassoma hebraicum PARROTFISH Scaridae<br />

Sixbar wrasse Thalassoma hardwicke RABBITFISH Siganidae<br />

UNICORNFISH Nasinae<br />

BATFISH/SPADEFISH Ephippidae


Commercially Targeted Fish<br />

The methodology for data acquisition <strong>of</strong> targeted fish abundance was slightly<br />

modified from that <strong>of</strong> reef fish data. This was due to the habits and characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

target fish which display a lower affinity with the benthos over which they reside. Data<br />

were collected by a pair <strong>of</strong> SCUBA divers swimming underwater along the reef at a<br />

constant depth for fifteen minutes, noting the abundance <strong>of</strong> all target fish they saw.<br />

Commercially targeted fish searched for is shown in Table 5. GPS start and end positions<br />

were taken for all commercial targeted fish survey dives.<br />

Table 5. Fish species list used for collection <strong>of</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> commercially targeted data collection.<br />

Common name Latin name Common name Latin name<br />

GROUPER EMPEROR<br />

Peacock Grouper Cephalopholis argus Spangled Emperor Lethrinus nebulosus<br />

Sixspot Grouper Cephalopholis sexmaculata Blackspot Emperor Lethrinus harak<br />

Coral Hind Grouper Cephalopholis miniata Longface Emperor Lethrinus olivaceus<br />

Saddleback coral Grouper Plectropomus laevis Bigeye Emperor Monotaxis grandoculus<br />

Whitespotted Grouper Epinephelus<br />

caeruleopunctatus<br />

Other Grouper Any other grouper species<br />

Other Emperor Any other emperor species<br />

SNAPPER Thumbprint Spinecheek Scolopsis bimaculatus<br />

Blackspot Snapper Lutjanus ehrenbergi<br />

Red Snapper Lutjanus bohar JACKS / TREVALLYS Carangidae<br />

Bluelined Snapper Lutjanus kasmira KINGFISH / TUNA Scombridae<br />

Other Snapper Any other snapper species PARROTFISH Scaridae<br />

SWEETLIPS SURGEONFISH Acanthuridae<br />

Black Sweetlips Plectorhinchus sordidus RABBITFISH Siganidae<br />

Slatey Sweetlips Diagramma pictum GOATFISH Mullidae<br />

Oriental Sweetlips Plectorhinchus orientalis BARRACUDA Sphyraenidae<br />

Blackspotted Sweetlips Plectorhinchus gaterinus TRIGGERFISH Balistidae<br />

Goldspotted Sweetlips Plectorhinchus<br />

flavomaculatus<br />

NEEDLEFISH Belonidae<br />

Other Sweetlips Any other sweetlips species FUSILIERS Caesionidae<br />

SHARKS / RAYS Carcharhinidae/Dasyatidae


As with the other data collection methods employed for this report, divers swam<br />

at a constant depth, following contours <strong>of</strong> the reef rather than a specific bearing. Data<br />

were collected at a range <strong>of</strong> depths, as with the transect methodologies, to allow<br />

differences across the depth gradients to be observed. In some cases, fish appear on both<br />

the reef fish census, and on the commercial fish census, highlighting their importance<br />

within the reef community. Some species listed in Table 5 have been identified only to<br />

family level for simplicity <strong>of</strong> the survey method and to ensure data accuracy.<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

Shallow seagrass beds (< 2m deep) within the inner and outer lagoon areas were<br />

assessed. Inner lagoon sites were located within 300m <strong>of</strong> the island shoreline and outer<br />

lagoon sites were within 300m <strong>of</strong> the reef edge. In addition deep (> 4m) seagrass habitats<br />

were assessed for fish abundance where they were found to be particularly extensive. A<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> four lagoon sites were selected at each island, two inner and two outer. Each<br />

site consisted <strong>of</strong> 10 points chosen to form a grid pattern within an area extending to<br />

250m². Each <strong>of</strong> the 10 points selected had the centre point GPS marked. Four 1m²<br />

quadrats were thrown out from the centre point at 90° to each other, within a 10m<br />

diameter circular area. Each quadrat area was visually inspected for substrate and benthos<br />

composition based on estimates <strong>of</strong> percent cover. Invertebrate species present, and their<br />

abundance, were also recorded.<br />

Fish abundance on the deep seagrass beds was also assessed for some sites. Fish<br />

were recorded in 22 different categories (Table 6) during 5 minute swims over seagrass<br />

habitats on given bearings. Types and density <strong>of</strong> seagrass species were also recorded.<br />

Sites were studied where accessible and extensive seagrass habitats were found at depths<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4m or deeper.<br />

Table 6. Fish species list used for collection <strong>of</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> fish species found on seagrass habitats.<br />

Common name Latin name Common name Latin name<br />

Damselfish SIGANIDAE Rabbitfish SIGANIDAE<br />

Goatfish MULLIDAE Surgeonfish ACANTHURIDAE


Indian Ocean Bird wrasse Gomphosus caeruleus Barracuda SPHYRAENIDAE<br />

Cigar wrasse Cephalopholis miniata Pufferfish Any pufferfish species<br />

Other wrasses Plectropomus laevis Sergeantfish Any seargeantfish species<br />

Whitespotted Grouper Epinephelus<br />

caeruleopunctatus<br />

Razorfish Any razorfish species<br />

Snapper Any other snapper species Demosielle Neopomacentrus spp.<br />

Emperor Any emperor species Cardinalfish APOGONIDAE<br />

Emperor juvenile Any juvenile emperor species Tobys CANTHIGASTERINAE<br />

Fusiliers CAESIONIDAE Grouper Any grouper species<br />

Parrotfish SCARIDAE Other Any other fish species<br />

Seagrass Parrotfish Leptoscarus vaigienis<br />

4. Stakeholder Identification & Analysis<br />

Stakeholder activities were identified by direct observation and informal<br />

interviews. Observations such as counting and categorising fishing vessels were carried<br />

out in situ during surveys on the study sites. Stakeholder interviews were conducted both<br />

within and outside the study sites.<br />

IV. Results<br />

A. Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (NIMR)<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

A prototype patch mosaic was created using the high resolution satellite image<br />

(Figure 3). The data collected at NIMR, through transect, spot checks and manta tows,<br />

were used to describe the identified patches using the methodologies described. Initial<br />

data collection demonstrated that there was a greater diversity <strong>of</strong> patch types than initially<br />

delineated. The final habitat patch mosaic was created using all the ground pro<strong>of</strong>ing data<br />

collected. Final patch types included additional types such as areas dominated by or<br />

including macro algae, coralline rubble and a variety <strong>of</strong> different mixed habitat types.


The mapping process has described the shape and extent <strong>of</strong> the main terrestrial,<br />

tidal and marine habitats within the reserve area. The final habitat map created included<br />

six major patch types, ranging from reefs dominated by Acropora corals, through<br />

seagrass beds, to mixed macroalgal environments.<br />

Figure 3. Final habitat patch map <strong>of</strong> NIMR created using a high resolution satellite image and GPS track,<br />

point and transect info.<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitat


Several areas <strong>of</strong> coral reef habitat have been observed within the borders <strong>of</strong><br />

NIMR. The major areas <strong>of</strong> scleractinian coral are on the western and southern sides <strong>of</strong><br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong>, along the reef drop-<strong>of</strong>f extending from the north-west <strong>of</strong> the reserve area<br />

down to the north-east, on deeper reef sites in the eastern section <strong>of</strong> the reserve, and in<br />

scattered patches within the lagoonal area at the centre <strong>of</strong> the reserve. These consist <strong>of</strong> a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> reef types supporting differing coral communities. Along the western side <strong>of</strong><br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong>, and in parts along the shallow areas <strong>of</strong> the northern reef edge, are<br />

branching Acropora dominated communities. These communities are typical <strong>of</strong> those<br />

found in more exposed environments with higher levels <strong>of</strong> water flux. The deeper sites in<br />

the eastern section consist primarily <strong>of</strong> very large massive corals. Massive growth forms<br />

also tend to dominate the reef framework on the lagoon and back reef sites, but the<br />

communities here also support other coral species and include columnar and branching<br />

forms.<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

The reef habitats observed on the reef flat and slope on the western side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

island (Site 2) have the highest exposure to anthropogenic influences. This is manifested<br />

in some damage occurring, particularly on the reef flat, with large areas <strong>of</strong> broken<br />

branching and foliaceous coral. However, this site still has high levels <strong>of</strong> scleractinian<br />

coral cover (Figure 4), especially on the deeper parts <strong>of</strong> the reef and on areas further<br />

away from the fishing camp, and supports an abundant fish population. As with all the<br />

reef areas assessed, there is a high coverage <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t corals (Figure 4). The scleractinian<br />

coral community on this reef consists primarily <strong>of</strong> branching Acropora as well as large<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> foliaceous corals (Figure 5).<br />

Bleaching, primarily <strong>of</strong> branching Acropora species on the shallow reef flat, was<br />

observed on two visits. Water temperature during this period was an average <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 34°C. In addition, some bleached colonies had suffered partial mortality,<br />

most likely as a result <strong>of</strong> the bleaching event.


Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

All hard coral<br />

Dead Coral<br />

Bleached Coral<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Sponge<br />

Other Benthic Organisms<br />

Seagrass<br />

Macroalgae<br />

Turf algae on coral rock<br />

Turf algae on rubble<br />

Crustose Coralline Algae<br />

Nutrient Indicator Algae<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Other<br />

Figure 4. Average percent cover (+/- SE) by benthic type across all transects completed at site 2, Nyororo.<br />

Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Massive Branching Columnar Submassive Foliaceous Encrusting Solitary Tabular<br />

Figure 5. Average percent cover (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> scleractinian coral by growth morphology across all transects<br />

completed at site 2, Nyororo.<br />

Site 3 (NW Reef) at NIMR is located on the seaward side <strong>of</strong> the northern most<br />

reef edge that extends from the north <strong>of</strong> Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> down to the east <strong>of</strong> the reserve


area, the most extensive continuous reef site identified at NIMR. The north-west tip <strong>of</strong><br />

the reef consists <strong>of</strong> extensive Thalassodendron cilatum seagrass beds but changes into a<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t coral dominated reef approximately 300m along the reef edge to the east. The rocky<br />

reef section extends down to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10m. Sand substrates are found at the bottom <strong>of</strong><br />

the reef edge, which then very gradually slopes downwards reaching a maximum depth <strong>of</strong><br />

about 20m. The site is frequently subject to strong currents and high turbidity. In places,<br />

the shallow crest and reef flat areas support branching Acropora communities, however,<br />

at other locations, such as site 3, the shallow areas are dominated by macroalgae and<br />

seagrass.<br />

This section <strong>of</strong> reef is formed <strong>of</strong> coral rock overlaid by loose sand and rubble<br />

substrates. It supports a diverse and extensive s<strong>of</strong>t coral community (27.78% +/- SE<br />

4.67), as well as sponge (7.33% +/-SE 1.04) and scleractinian coral species (7.17% +/-<br />

SE 2.22) (Figure 6). The scleractinian coral consists primarily <strong>of</strong> massive growth forms<br />

(6.17% +/- SE 2.30) with low levels <strong>of</strong> encrusting and branching forms (Figure 7).<br />

Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

All hard coral<br />

Dead Coral<br />

Bleached Coral<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Sponge<br />

Other Benthic Organisms<br />

Seagrass<br />

Macroalgae<br />

Turf algae on rubble<br />

Turf algae on coral rock<br />

Crustose Coralline Algae<br />

Nutrient Indicator Algae<br />

Rock<br />

Figure 6. Average percent cover (+/- SE) by benthic type across all transects completed at site 3, NIMR.<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Other


Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Massive Branching Columnar Submassive Foliaceous Encrusting Solitary Tabular<br />

Figure 7. Average percent cover (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> scleractinian coral by growth morphology across all transects<br />

completed at site 3, NIMR.<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

Observations <strong>of</strong> catch levels for octopi and various gastropods appears to be very<br />

high, which suggests abundant populations around Nyororo. However, this was not borne<br />

out by the transect data collected. Collection <strong>of</strong> further data sets at other sites might<br />

reveal which areas support higher population levels, and therefore are <strong>of</strong> greatest<br />

importance to fishers. The majority <strong>of</strong> invertebrates observed at both site 2 and 3 were<br />

urchins or starfish. Site 3 had much higher abundances than site 2 for Other Urchins<br />

(Table 3) (Site 2: 8.67 +/- SE 8.37; Site 3: 42.25 +/- SE 14.90) and NT Starfish (Table 3)<br />

(Site 2: 2.94 +/- SE 0.67, Figure 8; Site 3: 37.17 +/- SE 5.06, Figure 9), although both<br />

sites exhibited high variability in abundances. Nudibranch species were also common at<br />

both sites, with similar abundance levels recorded.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Diadema<br />

Other Urchin<br />

Edible Cucumber<br />

Non-edible cucumber<br />

Octopus<br />

Squid/Cuttlefish<br />

Nudibranch<br />

Lobster<br />

COTS<br />

NT Starfish<br />

Giant Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Triton Trumpet<br />

Drupella<br />

Bull Mouth Helmet<br />

Figure 8. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrate species observed across all transects completed at site 2, NIMR.<br />

Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Diadema<br />

Other Urchin<br />

Edible Cucumber<br />

Non-edible cucumber<br />

Octopus<br />

Squid/Cuttlefish<br />

Nudibranch<br />

Lobster<br />

COTS<br />

NT Starfish<br />

Giant Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Triton Trumpet<br />

Drupella<br />

Bull Mouth Helmet<br />

Figure 9. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrate species observed across all transects completed at site 3, NIMR.<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

In total 26 species or groups <strong>of</strong> reef fish were recorded out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 55 looked<br />

for (Table 4) at Site 2, NIMR (Fishing Camp Reef). Highest abundances were recorded


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

for parrotfish (4.78+/-1.72 per transect) and for black surgeonfish (2.73+/-0.87). Key<br />

butterfly fish species present were Threadfin and Redfin. Redfin butterfly fish feed<br />

exclusively on coral polyps and are therefore very strongly associated with coral rich<br />

habitats. There were also a range <strong>of</strong> wrasses and goatfish species present (Figure 10).<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Lined Butterflyfish<br />

Saddleback Butterflyfish<br />

Black Backed Butterflyfish<br />

Vagabond Butterflyfish<br />

Threadfin Butterflyfish<br />

Teardrop Butterflyfish<br />

Bennetts Butterflyfish<br />

Zanzibar Butterflyfish<br />

Crown Butterflyfish<br />

Kleins Butterflyfish<br />

Yellowhead Butterflyfish<br />

Racoon Butterflyfish<br />

Spotted Butterflyfish<br />

Somali Butterflyfish<br />

Redfin Butterflyfish<br />

Meyers Butterflyfish<br />

Chevron Butterflyfish<br />

Blackburns Butterflyfish<br />

Black Pyramid<br />

Big Long-nosed<br />

Longfin Bannerfish<br />

Masked Bannerfish<br />

Three Spot Angelfish<br />

Dusky Angelfish<br />

Regal Angelfish<br />

Emperor Angelfish<br />

Semi Circle Angelfish<br />

Earspot Angelfish<br />

Yellowbar Angelfish<br />

Moorish Idol<br />

Brushtail Tang<br />

Sailfin Tang<br />

Convict Surgeonfish<br />

Powder Blue Surgeonfish<br />

Palette Surgeonfish<br />

Thompsons Surgeonfish<br />

Lietenant Surgeonfish<br />

Black Surgeonfish<br />

Two Spot Bristletooth<br />

Striped Bristletooth<br />

Goldring Bristletooth<br />

Slingjaw Wrasse<br />

Checkerboard Wrasse<br />

Indian Ocean Bird Wrasse<br />

Goldbar Wrasse<br />

Six-bar Wasse<br />

Yellow Saddle Goatfish<br />

Long Barbel Goatfish<br />

Dash & Dot Goatfish<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Grouper<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Unicornfish<br />

Batfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Figure 10. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> reef fish species observed on across all transects completed at site 2, NIMR.<br />

In total 24 species or groups <strong>of</strong> reef fish were recorded out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 55 looked<br />

for (Table 4) at Site 3, NIMR (NW Reef). Highest abundances were recorded for two<br />

spot bristletooth (2.08+/- 0.53 per transect) and for striped bristletooth (1.83+/- 0.44)<br />

(Figure 13). Key butterfly fish species present were Vagabond, Kleins and Chevron.<br />

Other commonly recorded reef fish at this site were triggerfish, goatfish and wrasses<br />

(Figure 11).


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Lined Butterflyfish<br />

Saddleback Butterflyfish<br />

Black Backed Butterflyfish<br />

Vagabond Butterflyfish<br />

Threadfin Butterflyfish<br />

Teardrop Butterflyfish<br />

Bennetts Butterflyfish<br />

Zanzibar Butterflyfish<br />

Crown Butterflyfish<br />

Kleins Butterflyfish<br />

Yellowhead Butterflyfish<br />

Racoon Butterflyfish<br />

Spotted Butterflyfish<br />

Somali Butterflyfish<br />

Redfin Butterflyfish<br />

Meyers Butterflyfish<br />

Chevron Butterflyfish<br />

Blackburns Butterflyfish<br />

Black Pyramid<br />

Big Long-nosed<br />

Longfin Bannerfish<br />

Masked Bannerfish<br />

Three Spot Angelfish<br />

Dusky Angelfish<br />

Regal Angelfish<br />

Emperor Angelfish<br />

Semi Circle Angelfish<br />

Earspot Angelfish<br />

Yellowbar Angelfish<br />

Moorish Idol<br />

Brushtail Tang<br />

Sailfin Tang<br />

Convict Surgeonfish<br />

Powder Blue Surgeonfish<br />

Palette Surgeonfish<br />

Thompsons Surgeonfish<br />

Lietenant Surgeonfish<br />

Black Surgeonfish<br />

Two Spot Bristletooth<br />

Striped Bristletooth<br />

Goldring Bristletooth<br />

Slingjaw Wrasse<br />

Checkerboard Wrasse<br />

Indian Ocean Bird Wrasse<br />

Goldbar Wrasse<br />

Six-bar Wasse<br />

Yellow Saddle Goatfish<br />

Long Barbel Goatfish<br />

Dash & Dot Goatfish<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Grouper<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Unicornfish<br />

Batfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Figure 11. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> reef fish species observed across all transects completed at site three,<br />

NIMR.<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

Observations made whilst exploring the reefs have shown the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> commercial fish species <strong>of</strong> relatively high abundance, namely blackspotted<br />

sweetlips (Plectorhinchus gaterinus), goldspotted sweetlips (Plectrohinchus<br />

flavomaculatus) and several species <strong>of</strong> snapper (Lutjanidae spp). In particular, site 2 had<br />

high numbers <strong>of</strong> black spotted and gold spotted sweetlips present. All <strong>of</strong> the surveyed<br />

sites had abundant populations <strong>of</strong> surgeonfish and parrotfish. Low numbers <strong>of</strong> groupers<br />

were observed during commercial fish swims.<br />

A small number <strong>of</strong> the commercial fish species looked for were present at site 1 at<br />

NIMR. Highest abundances were recorded for surgeonfish (Acanthuridae spp.),<br />

parrotfish, and black spot snappers and emperors (Figure 12). Other recorded families<br />

include snappers, sweetlips, goatfish, triggerfish, and fusiliers.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Peacock Grouper<br />

Sixspot Grouper<br />

Coral Hind Grouper<br />

Saddleback Coral Grouper<br />

Whitespotted Grouper<br />

Other Grouper<br />

Blackspot Snapper<br />

Red Snapper<br />

Blue Lined Snapper<br />

Other Snapper<br />

Black Sweetlips<br />

Slatey Sweetlips<br />

Oriental Sweetlips<br />

Blackspotted Sweetlips<br />

Goldspotted Sweetlips<br />

Other Sweetlips<br />

Spangled Emperor<br />

Blackspot Emperor<br />

Longface Emperor<br />

Bigeye Emperor<br />

Other Emperor<br />

Thumbprint Spinecheek<br />

Jacks/Trevally<br />

Kingfish/Tuna<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Surgeonfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Goatfish<br />

Barracuda<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Needlefish<br />

Fusiliers<br />

Sharks/Rays<br />

Figure 12. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> commercial fish species observed on across all swims completed at site 1,<br />

NIMR.<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

Initial observations have shown that there are extensive, varied and rich seagrass<br />

beds at various locations around NIMR (Figure 3). Further examination <strong>of</strong> these areas<br />

would be likely to demonstrate the importance <strong>of</strong> these habitats and their significant role<br />

to the ecological diversity found at NIMR. Constraints imposed by both time and weather<br />

conditions meant that no data could be collected on seagrass habitats in NIMR during the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

4. Stakeholder identification & analysis<br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> has a large and permanent fishing camp. The camp features a<br />

lighthouse and lookout tower to aid navigation, and stocks basic supplies such as food<br />

that passing vessels may take on. Boats from both <strong>Mafia</strong> and the mainland rendezvous<br />

here to trade. Its position between the two makes it ideal both as a trading post and as a


stop <strong>of</strong>f or shelter. Boats from the mainland were frequently observed to anchor <strong>of</strong>f the<br />

fishing camp at Nyororo to rest before night fishing with nets and lamps <strong>of</strong>f the north-<br />

west <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mafia</strong>. Growth <strong>of</strong> the settlement is limited by fresh water which must be<br />

imported. Local information suggests that there was once a good supply <strong>of</strong> fresh water<br />

available from a bore hole on the island but that over-use has resulted in the water<br />

becoming brackish and no longer drinkable.<br />

During the season <strong>of</strong> the northerly monsoon the camp was restricted to a<br />

remainder <strong>of</strong> around 30 fishers, who were originally from many different coastal districts<br />

in Tanzania, although it could at other times support many times this number. During the<br />

high season fishers are reported to come from many coastal regions on the mainland, and<br />

from <strong>Mafia</strong>, to setup temporary camp on Nyororo due to the high quality <strong>of</strong> the fishing.<br />

Many fish species are targeted opportunistically: unicorn fish (Naso sp.), groupers<br />

(Serranidae sp.), surgeon fish (Acanthurus sp.), parrot fish (Scaridae sp.) and a moray eel<br />

(Muraenidae sp.) were present on the drying racks on a visit to the camp. Octopus forms<br />

the mainstay <strong>of</strong> the commercial species targeted by fishers based on Nyororo <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

From 250 to 300 individuals were present on the camp and available for purchase at<br />

Tsh1600 per kilo during one visit. Octopus soup was also available. A few marine curios,<br />

notably the bullmouth helmet shell and triton trumpet shell, were present and prepared for<br />

sale. There have been reports that dynamite fishing is sometimes carried out on reefs<br />

within NIMR. Further work would be needed to ascertain the locations and extent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> this practice.<br />

B. Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (SIMR)<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

A patch mosaic was created from the low resolution satellite image in conjunction<br />

with benthic cover data, spot checks, and habitat patch boundary tracking (Figure 13).<br />

The mapping process showed that the main coral reef habitat is found on the northern and<br />

eastern sides <strong>of</strong> the island, around 1km distant from the island. The reef is approximately


2.5km in length and 100m in width at its maximum. In the main, the coral reef habitats<br />

are shallow, with the bottom <strong>of</strong> the reef reaching a maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 12m only.<br />

Between the island and the reef is a shallow seagrass bed formed primarily <strong>of</strong><br />

Thalassodendron cilatum. The shallow areas to the west <strong>of</strong> the island comprise <strong>of</strong> sand<br />

flats, intermixed with small coral ‘bommies’ and dense Thalassodendron cilatum<br />

seagrass patches. A narrow sandstone rock platform runs through the northern section <strong>of</strong><br />

the island and extends out into the sea on either side. There is also a small rock platform<br />

close to shore on the western side <strong>of</strong> the island. The southern end <strong>of</strong> the island has a small<br />

shallow sand bar extending from the island to the south, quickly dropping into deeper<br />

water down to 35m at approximately 500m from the shore.<br />

Figure 13: Final habitat patch map <strong>of</strong> SIMR created using a low resolution satellite image and GPS track,<br />

point and transect info. The current reserve boundaries are shown.


2. Coral Reef Habitat<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

Benthic composition data was collected on coral reef habitats identified through<br />

spot checks <strong>of</strong> sites and broad-scale benthic composition assessments. A total <strong>of</strong> 41<br />

transects were completed over four sites. The reef is primarily dominated by s<strong>of</strong>t corals<br />

with significant scleractinian coral areas (Figure 14). SIMR features all scleratinian coral<br />

growth forms, but the majority consists <strong>of</strong> massive Porities and branching Acropora<br />

species (Figure 15). As half <strong>of</strong> the data was collected at the lowest margin <strong>of</strong> the reef<br />

slope, and two <strong>of</strong> the sites were situated towards the end <strong>of</strong> the reef, a high level <strong>of</strong> sand<br />

substrates was recorded. This reflects the patchy nature <strong>of</strong> the coral reef at both its<br />

deepest margins and its edges.<br />

Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

All hard coral<br />

Dead Coral<br />

Bleached Coral<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Sponge<br />

Other Benthic Organisms<br />

Seagrass<br />

Macroalgae<br />

Turf algae on coral rock<br />

Turf algae on rubble<br />

Crustose Coralline Algae<br />

Nutrient Indicator Algae<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Other<br />

Figure 14. Average percent cover by benthic type for all transects completed on coral reef habitats at<br />

SIMR.


Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Massive Branching Columnar Submassive Foliaceous Encrusting Solitary Tabular<br />

Figure 15. Average percent cover by scleractinian coral growth morphology across all transects completed<br />

on coral reef habitats at SIMR.<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

Abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrates was collected alongside benthic composition and reef<br />

fish data on the identified coral reef habitats. Overall, invertebrate presence was high,<br />

with particularly large numbers <strong>of</strong> starfish recorded (Figure 16). In addition 1.83 (SE+/-<br />

0.34) sea cucumbers, which are targeted for the bêche de mer trade, were found per 25m<br />

transect (Figure 16). Numbers <strong>of</strong> diadema and other urchin species recorded were low in<br />

comparison to other nearby reefs. No squid, cuttlefish or octopus were recorded on any <strong>of</strong><br />

the transects. However, a single small cuttlefish was observed on one occasion on the reef<br />

whilst snorkelling.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Diadema<br />

Other Urchin<br />

Edible Cucumber<br />

Non-edible cucumber<br />

Octopus<br />

Squid/Cuttlefish<br />

Nudibranch<br />

Lobster<br />

COTS<br />

NT Starfish<br />

Giant Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Triton Trumpet<br />

Drupella<br />

Bull Mouth Helmet<br />

Figure 16. Mean abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> invertebrates recorded on all transects completed on coral reef<br />

habitat at SIMR.<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

Reef fish data was collected over the same 25m transects as benthic composition<br />

and invertebrate data. Reef fish counts were high, and although very variable; several<br />

species were recorded for each transect. Certain species such as dash and dot goatfish<br />

(Parupeneus barberinus) and striped bristletooth (Ctenochaetus striatus) ranked among<br />

the most abundant fish species on average per 25m transect at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1.88 +/- SE 0.29<br />

and 1.88 +/- 0.29 SE, respectively (Figure 17). The diverse parrotfish family (Scaridae)<br />

was also notably high, although this category included all species <strong>of</strong> parrotfish, not<br />

individual species. Of the 55 species or groups <strong>of</strong> reef fish data were collected on, 32<br />

were recorded on transects at SIMR.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Lined Butterflyfish<br />

Saddleback Butterflyfish<br />

Black Backed Butterflyfish<br />

Vagabond Butterflyfish<br />

Threadfin Butterflyfish<br />

Teardrop Butterflyfish<br />

Bennetts Butterflyfish<br />

Zanzibar Butterflyfish<br />

Crown Butterflyfish<br />

Kleins Butterflyfish<br />

Yellowhead Butterflyfish<br />

Racoon Butterflyfish<br />

Spotted Butterflyfish<br />

Somali Butterflyfish<br />

Redfin Butterflyfish<br />

Meyers Butterflyfish<br />

Chevron Butterflyfish<br />

Blackburns Butterflyfish<br />

Black Pyramid<br />

Big Long-nosed<br />

Longfin Bannerfish<br />

Masked Bannerfish<br />

Three Spot Angelfish<br />

Dusky Angelfish<br />

Regal Angelfish<br />

Emperor Angelfish<br />

Semi Circle Angelfish<br />

Earspot Angelfish<br />

Yellowbar Angelfish<br />

Moorish Idol<br />

Brushtail Tang<br />

Sailfin Tang<br />

Convict Surgeonfish<br />

Powder Blue Surgeonfish<br />

Palette Surgeonfish<br />

Thompsons Surgeonfish<br />

Lietenant Surgeonfish<br />

Black Surgeonfish<br />

Two Spot Bristletooth<br />

Striped Bristletooth<br />

Goldring Bristletooth<br />

Slingjaw Wrasse<br />

Checkerboard Wrasse<br />

Indian Ocean Bird Wrasse<br />

Goldbar Wrasse<br />

Six-bar Wasse<br />

Yellow Saddle Goatfish<br />

Long Barbel Goatfish<br />

Dash & Dot Goatfish<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Grouper<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Unicornfish<br />

Batfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Figure 17: Average abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> reef fish recorded on all transects completed on coral reef<br />

habitat at SIMR.<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> eight commercial fish surveys were completed for SIMR. Common<br />

species noted include Sweetlips (Haemulidae), Jacks and Trevallys (Carangidae),<br />

Surgeonfish (Acanthuridae), Parrotfish (Scaridae), Goatfish (Mullidae), and Fusiliers<br />

(Caesionidae) (Figure 18). SIMR has a particularly high population <strong>of</strong> Blue Spotted<br />

Stingrays (Dasyatis kuhlii) which is not reflected well in the data collected, as they tend<br />

to be buried in sandy substrates at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the reef. In some locations, between 20<br />

and 30 stingrays were observed during each 45 minute dive.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Peacock Grouper<br />

Sixspot Grouper<br />

Coral Hind Grouper<br />

Saddleback Coral Grouper<br />

Whitespotted Grouper<br />

Other Grouper<br />

Blackspot Snapper<br />

Red Snapper<br />

Blue Lined Snapper<br />

Other Snapper<br />

Black Sweetlips<br />

Slatey Sweetlips<br />

Oriental Sweetlips<br />

Blackspotted Sweetlips<br />

Goldspotted Sweetlips<br />

Other Sweetlips<br />

Spangled Emperor<br />

Blackspot Emperor<br />

Longface Emperor<br />

Bigeye Emperor<br />

Other Emperor<br />

Thumbprint Spinecheek<br />

Jacks/Trevally<br />

Kingfish/Tuna<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Surgeonfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Goatfish<br />

Barracuda<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Needlefish<br />

Fusiliers<br />

Sharks/Rays<br />

Figure 18. Average abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> commercial fish recorded on all swims completed on coral reef<br />

habitat at SIMR.<br />

3. Seagrass Habitats<br />

Shallow lagoonal areas surrounding Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> contain extensive areas <strong>of</strong><br />

seagrass habitat which extend from the island out to the reef edge, approximately 1km<br />

distant. The seagrass habitats surveyed are composed <strong>of</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> seagrass but are<br />

primarily dominated by Thalassodendron cilatum and Thalassia hemprichi. Deeper areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> seagrass beds were observed to the south-east and north-west <strong>of</strong> the island; they<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> dense patches <strong>of</strong> Thalassodendron cilatum set within sand substrates. Substrate<br />

composition varies depending on site location, with a greater proportion <strong>of</strong> rock and<br />

rubble recorded at sites on the outer lagoonal edge. Invertebrate populations consist<br />

primarily <strong>of</strong> urchins and razor clams. Starfish are more commonly found on the sandy<br />

patches within the seagrass beds.<br />

a) Substrate composition<br />

Site 1 is a shallow lagoonal site close to the island to the north <strong>of</strong> the rock<br />

platform bordered to the east by a sand bar. Average substrate composition for site 1


shows a dominance <strong>of</strong> sand substrates with a lower level <strong>of</strong> rubble formed from coral<br />

rock (Figure 19); rock substrates form only 1% on average <strong>of</strong> the site 1 habitats.<br />

77%<br />

Figure 19. Average substrate composition <strong>of</strong> seagrass habitats at site 1 (Inner lagoonal) at SIMR.<br />

b) Benthic composition<br />

1%<br />

22%<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

The seagrass coverage at this location is more varied in terms <strong>of</strong> species diversity<br />

than at similar sites at MBIMR, but overall abundance is much lower. In contrast to other<br />

sites surveyed coverage <strong>of</strong> Thalassia hemprichi was over three times higher than<br />

Thalassodendron cilatum. Small percentages <strong>of</strong> the two other seagrass species found<br />

were intermixed with Thalassia hemprichi (Figure 20).


68%<br />

5%<br />

18%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

6%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

Thalassodendron cilatum<br />

Thalassia hemprichi<br />

Haduole universis<br />

Hadoule ovalis<br />

Sponge<br />

Hard Coral<br />

Algae<br />

Anenome<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Bare Substrate<br />

Figure 20: Average benthic composition <strong>of</strong> seagrass habitats at site 1 (Inner lagoonal) at SIMR.<br />

c) Invertebrate abundance<br />

Invertebrate abundance was collected within the same quadrat areas as for<br />

substrate composition and benthic composition. Largest abundances for site 1 were<br />

observed for urchin (0.63 +/- 0.21) and razor clam (0.3 +/- 0.21), although overall<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrates was low (Figure 21).<br />

Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Urchins<br />

Sea Cucumber<br />

Starfish<br />

Razor Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Scallop<br />

Nudibranchs<br />

Shrimp<br />

Gastropod<br />

Cone Shell<br />

Figure 21: Average abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrates (+/- SE) present on seagrass habitats at site 1 (Inner<br />

lagoonal) at SIMR.<br />

Tube Worm


d) Fish abundance<br />

Deep seagrass habitats at SIMR support large numbers <strong>of</strong> juvenile emperor<br />

species, as well as smaller numbers <strong>of</strong> barracuda, rabbit fish, and fusiliers (Figure 22).<br />

Shallow seagrass areas have lower numbers <strong>of</strong> commercially important species, but a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> wrasse and goatfish species were recorded in addition to juvenile emperors<br />

(Figure 22). Out <strong>of</strong> the 22 categories looked for, individuals were present in 20<br />

categories.<br />

Average abundance recorded (+/- SE)<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

damselfish<br />

goatfish<br />

cigar wrasse<br />

bird wrasse<br />

other wrasse<br />

snapper<br />

emperor<br />

emperor juvenile<br />

fuseliers<br />

SG parrot<br />

parrot<br />

surgeon<br />

pufferfish<br />

sergeantfis<br />

barracuda<br />

razorfish<br />

rabbitfish<br />

demoiselle<br />

cardinalfish<br />

toby<br />

grouper<br />

other<br />

Shungimbili Shallow Shungimbili Deep<br />

Figure 22. Average abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> fish recorded on all swims completed on seagrass habitat at<br />

SIMR.<br />

4. Stakeholder identification & analysis<br />

Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> has no permanent (or semi permanent) fishing camp. Some<br />

fishers do camp on the island for extremely short stays <strong>of</strong> one or two nights, but do not<br />

build shelters. This is due to the small amount <strong>of</strong> the island that remains permanently<br />

above the high water mark. The reefs are visited by fishers who camp for longer periods


on Mbarakuni. At times <strong>of</strong> good weather, small dugout canoes were frequently present.<br />

Fishers were <strong>of</strong>ten seen snorkelling on the seagrass beds or fishing from small boats<br />

using lines.<br />

Ras Mbisi lodge uses the island for tourism purposes. Guests who take part in<br />

whale shark sighting trips also visit to snorkel the fringing reef and picnic on the island.<br />

This island is selected for this use due to its near pristine natural beauty, excellent<br />

snorkelling and low numbers <strong>of</strong> fishermen present.<br />

C. Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve (MBIMR)<br />

1. Reserve Mapping<br />

A patch mosaic map was created from the low resolution imagery in conjunction<br />

with benthic cover data, spot checks, and habitat patch boundary tracking. The reef at<br />

MBIMR consists <strong>of</strong> a broken reef edge at approximately 6-8m deep running in a semi-<br />

circle from the north to the east side <strong>of</strong> the island. This area has the highest scleractinian<br />

coral cover observed in the reserve area, although much lower than observed at either<br />

Shungimbili or Nyororo. The area has a high, diverse and abundant sponge and s<strong>of</strong>t coral<br />

population which merits further detailed research. The reef edge encloses extensive areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> shallow seagrass, with deeper seagrass habitats found to the south <strong>of</strong> the island.


Figure 23. Final habitat patch map <strong>of</strong> MBIMR created using a low resolution satellite image and GPS<br />

track, point and transect info. The current reserve boundaries are shown.<br />

2. Coral Reef Habitat<br />

a) Benthic Composition<br />

The coral reef at MBIMR consists <strong>of</strong> a broken reef crest which extends around the<br />

north and east <strong>of</strong> the island approximately 1km from the island. At the most southerly<br />

section, the reef line eventually breaks up in to coral ‘bommies’ interspersed with sand<br />

and seagrass patches. The rest <strong>of</strong> the reef shows a fairly distinct vertical reef edge at<br />

around 5 to 8m deep, which is generally between 1 and 3m high. In some areas a second


edge is visible at around 10m deep. Above this, the reef gradually slopes up until it<br />

reaches the centre lagoonal seagrass habitat between 0.5 and 2m deep which is tide<br />

dependent. Beyond the reef edge, the dominant substrate is sand with occasional coral<br />

‘bommies’. In this habitat, sponges and s<strong>of</strong>t coral are most common but gradually<br />

become sparser further from the reef edge in deeper water. At a depth <strong>of</strong> 12m, coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> benthic organisms is very low and consists almost solely <strong>of</strong> sponge and s<strong>of</strong>t coral<br />

species.<br />

The main areas <strong>of</strong> the reef have an average scleractinian coral coverage <strong>of</strong> 7.55%<br />

(+/- SE 1.33) (Figure 24) consisting primarily <strong>of</strong> massive growth forms (4.1% +/- SE<br />

0.87) (Figure 25). The waters around MBIMR were <strong>of</strong>ten found to be highly turbid, with<br />

visibility frequently below 2m and with strong currents. The type <strong>of</strong> reef found at<br />

MBIMR is consistent with that expected under these environmental conditions.<br />

Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

All hard coral<br />

Dead Coral<br />

Bleached Coral<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Sponge<br />

Other Benthic Organisms<br />

Seagrass<br />

Macroalgae<br />

Turf algae on coral rock<br />

Turf algae on rubble<br />

Crustose Coralline Algae<br />

Nutrient Indicator Algae<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Silt<br />

Other<br />

Figure 24. Average percent cover by benthic type for all transects completed on coral reef habitats at<br />

MBIMR.


Average percent cover (+/- SE)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Massive Branching Columnar Submassive Foliaceous Encrusting Solitary Tabular<br />

Figure 25: Average percent cover by scleractinian coral growth morphology across all transects completed<br />

on coral reef habitats at MBIMR<br />

b) Invertebrate Abundance<br />

The invertebrate community <strong>of</strong> the reefs at MBIMR is dominated by various<br />

species <strong>of</strong> starfish which is comparable with the data collected at Shungimbili (Figure<br />

26). Small numbers <strong>of</strong> commercially important species such as edible sea cucumbers,<br />

giant clams, and cowrie shells were also recorded (Figure 26). The urchin population<br />

level is far lower than at NIMR, which is likely to be related to the very different reef<br />

communities observed at these sites. The nudibranch community shows particular<br />

diversity and abundance, and again along with the nudibranchs at Nyororo merits further<br />

research. Crown <strong>of</strong> thorn starfish (Acanthaster planci) were noted at several locations<br />

along the reef at MBIMR (Figure 26).


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Diadema<br />

Other Urchin<br />

Edible Cucumber<br />

Non-edible cucumber<br />

Octopus<br />

Squid/Cuttlefish<br />

Nudibranch<br />

Lobster<br />

COTS<br />

NT Starfish<br />

Giant Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Triton Trumpet<br />

Drupella<br />

Bull Mouth Helmet<br />

Figure 26. Average abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> invertebrates recorded on all transects completed on coral reef<br />

habitat at MBIMR.<br />

c) Reef Fish Abundance<br />

Reef fish data were collected over the same 25m transects as benthic composition<br />

and invertebrate data. Reef fish counts were high, and although very variable, several<br />

species were recorded for each transect. Certain species such as Dash and Dot Goatfish<br />

(Parupeneus barberinus) and Striped Bristletooth (Ctenochaetus striatus) ranked among<br />

the most abundant fish species on average per 25m transect at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1.55 (SE +/- 0.43)<br />

and 1.83 (SE +/- 0.44), respectively (Figure 27). Other common groups were Parrotfish,<br />

Triggerfish, and Moorish Idols. Of the 55 species or groups <strong>of</strong> reef fish data was<br />

collected on, 27 were recorded on transects at MBIMR.


Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Lined Butterflyfish<br />

Saddleback Butterflyfish<br />

Black Backed Butterflyfish<br />

Vagabond Butterflyfish<br />

Threadfin Butterflyfish<br />

Teardrop Butterflyfish<br />

Bennetts Butterflyfish<br />

Zanzibar Butterflyfish<br />

Crown Butterflyfish<br />

Kleins Butterflyfish<br />

Yellowhead Butterflyfish<br />

Racoon Butterflyfish<br />

Spotted Butterflyfish<br />

Somali Butterflyfish<br />

Redfin Butterflyfish<br />

Meyers Butterflyfish<br />

Chevron Butterflyfish<br />

Blackburns Butterflyfish<br />

Black Pyramid<br />

Big Long-nosed<br />

Longfin Bannerfish<br />

Masked Bannerfish<br />

Three Spot Angelfish<br />

Dusky Angelfish<br />

Regal Angelfish<br />

Emperor Angelfish<br />

Semi Circle Angelfish<br />

Earspot Angelfish<br />

Yellowbar Angelfish<br />

Moorish Idol<br />

Brushtail Tang<br />

Sailfin Tang<br />

Convict Surgeonfish<br />

Powder Blue Surgeonfish<br />

Palette Surgeonfish<br />

Thompsons Surgeonfish<br />

Lietenant Surgeonfish<br />

Black Surgeonfish<br />

Two Spot Bristletooth<br />

Striped Bristletooth<br />

Goldring Bristletooth<br />

Slingjaw Wrasse<br />

Checkerboard Wrasse<br />

Indian Ocean Bird Wrasse<br />

Goldbar Wrasse<br />

Six-bar Wasse<br />

Yellow Saddle Goatfish<br />

Long Barbel Goatfish<br />

Dash & Dot Goatfish<br />

Triggerfish<br />

Grouper<br />

Parrotfish<br />

Unicornfish<br />

Batfish<br />

Rabbitfish<br />

Figure 27. Mean abundance <strong>of</strong> reef fish species observed on all transects completed at MBIMR.<br />

d) Commercial Fish Abundance<br />

Four commercial fish surveys were completed for MBIMR. In common with<br />

SIMR, main species included Sweetlips (Haemulidae), Jacks and Trevallys (Carangidae),<br />

Emperors (Lethrinidae), and Fusiliers (Caesionidae).<br />

3. Seagrass Habitat<br />

a) Substrate composition<br />

Data collection took place on both inner and outer shallow lagoonal sites at<br />

MBIMR. A total <strong>of</strong> forty 1m² quadrat areas were assessed for each site within a 250m²<br />

area. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the substrate composition data for site 1 showed that on average 96%<br />

(+/-SE 0.92) <strong>of</strong> the area sampled was composed <strong>of</strong> sand with the remainder formed <strong>of</strong><br />

coral rock rubble (Figure 28). Site 2 (outer shallow) had a very different substrate<br />

composition; a quarter <strong>of</strong> the area consisted <strong>of</strong> rock with the remainder <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

divided equally between sand and rubble (Figure 29).


97%<br />

0%<br />

Figure 28. Average percentage cover <strong>of</strong> substrates at site 1 (inner shallow) at MBIMR.<br />

37%<br />

3%<br />

38%<br />

25%<br />

Figure 29. Average percentage cover <strong>of</strong> substrates at site 2 (inner shallow) at MBIMR. .<br />

b) Benthic composition<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Rock<br />

Rubble<br />

Sand<br />

Biomass <strong>of</strong> benthic flora and fauna was assessed alongside substrate composition.<br />

Site 1 (inner shallow) was highly dominated by Thalassodendron cilatum (54%) with<br />

much lower percentage <strong>of</strong> Thalassia hemprichi present (4%); low levels <strong>of</strong> macroalgae,<br />

sponge, and scleractinian corals were also recorded (Figure 30). Of the total area, on


average 35% was formed <strong>of</strong> bare substrates. Site 2 had similar levels <strong>of</strong> Thalassodendron<br />

cilatum and bare substrates to site one (Figure 31). However, in contrast to site 1, site 2<br />

had almost four times the amount <strong>of</strong> algae (primarily Sargassum spp.) and no Thalassia<br />

hemprichi present.<br />

35%<br />

0%<br />

4%<br />

1%<br />

2% 0%<br />

4%<br />

54%<br />

Thalassodendron cilatum<br />

Thalassia hemprichi<br />

Haduole universis<br />

Hadoule ovalis<br />

Sponge<br />

Hard Coral<br />

Algae<br />

Anenome<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Figure 30. Pie chart showing percentage cover <strong>of</strong> organic benthic communities.<br />

33%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

15%<br />

1%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

50%<br />

Bare Substrate<br />

Thalassodendron cilatum<br />

Thalassia hemprichi<br />

Haduole universis<br />

Hadoule ovalis<br />

Sponge<br />

Hard Coral<br />

Algae<br />

Anenome<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t Coral<br />

Bare Substrate<br />

Figure 31. Pie chart showing percentage cover <strong>of</strong> organic benthic communities.


c) Invertebrate abundance<br />

Invertebrate abundance was collected alongside substrate composition and benthic<br />

composition. Largest abundances for site 1 were observed for urchin (2.5 +/- SE 0.56)<br />

and starfish (2.1 +/- SE 0.22) species (Figure 32). Site 2 had a more diverse invertebrate<br />

community than recorded for site 1 but much lower abundance levels (Figure 33).<br />

Average abundance (+ /- S E )<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Urchins<br />

Sea Cucumber<br />

Starfish<br />

Razor Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Scallop<br />

Nudibranchs<br />

Shrimp<br />

Gastropod<br />

Cone Shell<br />

Tube Worm<br />

Figure 32. Average abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrates within sea grass habitats at site one showing standard error<br />

bars.<br />

Average abundance (+/- SE )<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Urchins<br />

Sea Cucumber<br />

Starfish<br />

Razor Clam<br />

Cowrie<br />

Scallop<br />

Nudibranchs<br />

Shrimp<br />

Gastropod<br />

Cone Shell<br />

Tube Worm<br />

Figure 33. Average abundance <strong>of</strong> invertebrates within sea grass habitats at site two showing standard error<br />

bars.


d) Fish abundance<br />

The highest abundance <strong>of</strong> juvenile emperors was recorded for the shallow and<br />

deep seagrass habitats at MBIMR out <strong>of</strong> all the habitats surveyed (Figure 34). These<br />

areas were also found to support large populations <strong>of</strong> seagrass Parrotfish (Leptoscerus<br />

vaigiensis) (Figure 34). In total, fish were recorded in half <strong>of</strong> the categories looked for. In<br />

contrast to the seagrass habitats around SIMR, no Barracuda, Surgeonfish, or Rabbit Fish<br />

were observed. This suggests that there is lower overall diversity at MBIMR.<br />

Average abundance (+/- SE)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

damselfish<br />

goatfish<br />

cigar wrasse<br />

bird wrasse<br />

other wrasse<br />

snapper<br />

emperor<br />

emperor juvenile<br />

fuseliers<br />

SG parrot<br />

parrot<br />

surgeon<br />

pufferfish<br />

sergeantfis<br />

barracuda<br />

razorfish<br />

rabbitfish<br />

demoiselle<br />

cardinalfish<br />

toby<br />

grouper<br />

other<br />

Mbarakuni Shallow Mbarakuni Deep<br />

Figure 34. Average abundance (+/- SE) <strong>of</strong> fish within shallow and deep sea grass beds for all fish swims<br />

completed<br />

4. Stakeholder identification & analysis<br />

Mbarakuni was observed to have a seasonal fishing camp where a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 30 fishers were based on a short term rolling basis. During the season <strong>of</strong><br />

northerly monsoon (November to March), the camp was vacated. Most visiting vessels<br />

were canoes and short range sailing vessels such as ‘ngalawas’ and fishing was generally<br />

artisanal. However, there were also some motorised commercial activities, notably


lobster fishing. A foreign financed lobster (Panulirus spp.) fishing operation was based<br />

on the island during the study period, except during periods <strong>of</strong> bad weather. The lobsters<br />

caught were reported to be solely for export to Dar Es Salaam where they would fetch a<br />

higher price. The operation used a 15hp motorboat, diving cylinders and a compressor<br />

operated from the island. As the fishers were reported to be paid per unit catch and were<br />

using SCUBA diving techniques, harvest levels may be beyond sustainable yield. Many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the explored areas showed evidence <strong>of</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> exploitation, such as full or<br />

partial remains <strong>of</strong> lobsters left on the reef.<br />

D. Fish Species List<br />

A fish species list was compiled during visits to all three reserve areas. The<br />

information was collected both within the context <strong>of</strong> other surveys, and in the interest <strong>of</strong><br />

species data gathering. Where possible, fish observed were identified to the lowest<br />

possible taxonomic level. The fish species list is not definitive and further survey work,<br />

particularly for smaller cryptic species, would be likely to extend it much further. The<br />

species lists are included in appendix 1.<br />

V. Discussion<br />

A. NIMR<br />

NIMR encompasses a range <strong>of</strong> marine habitats that include high density<br />

scleractinian coral reefs, mixed reef habitats dominated by s<strong>of</strong>t coral species, seagrass<br />

beds, and macroalgae habitats. Shallow marine habitats are found predominantly to the<br />

east <strong>of</strong> the island at distance <strong>of</strong> 4.5km from the island shore. To the west <strong>of</strong> the island the<br />

slope drops quickly down to 12m, with deeper areas composed <strong>of</strong> sand flats. A sand bar<br />

lies 1.8km to the south <strong>of</strong> the island and is surrounded by a mixed community <strong>of</strong><br />

seagrass, corals and other benthic organisms.


Coral reef habitats surveyed consisted <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> community types dependent<br />

on depth and location. In the main, coral reefs around Nyororo displayed a low<br />

percentage cover <strong>of</strong> scleractinian corals (5-10%) and higher levels <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t coral cover (25-<br />

30%). This is likely to be the result <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ten turbid conditions found in this area<br />

resulting from sediment influx from the Rufiji delta. Higher percent coverage <strong>of</strong><br />

scleractinian species was found at locations with high water flux and in very shallow<br />

areas where light penetration was sufficient to allow the growth <strong>of</strong> branching Acropora<br />

and other R-selected scleractinian coral species. On deeper sites, where light penetration<br />

levels were generally far lower, the scleractinian coral community was primarily<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> K-selected species with massive growth forms.<br />

<strong>Survey</strong>ed reefs included all types <strong>of</strong> communities found on reefs within NIMR.<br />

Sites 1 and 3 are typical <strong>of</strong> the main reef type found around Nyororo <strong>Island</strong>, with s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

coral dominance and low coverage <strong>of</strong> massive and encrusting scleractinian corals. Site 2<br />

is the only coral reef found within NIMR with areas <strong>of</strong> high scleractinian coral coverage,<br />

generally branching Acropora species. Site 4 is located on the deepest coral reef habitats<br />

found, which extend down to 20m. These habitats are formed <strong>of</strong> very large massive<br />

corals (up to 10m in diameter) on sand substrates. Small patches <strong>of</strong> branching Acropora<br />

are found in places along the shallowest parts <strong>of</strong> the northern reef where sites 1 and 3<br />

were located; however, they are very limited in their extent and do not form a continuous<br />

habitat band. Areas <strong>of</strong> sand substrate with medium sized massive corals (~1-4m<br />

diameter) were also found to the south <strong>of</strong> the island close to shore at approximately 5m<br />

depth.<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 55 reef fish species or family groups looked for, a total <strong>of</strong> 34 were<br />

recorded as present on survey reef sites at Nyororo. Variations in abundance were present<br />

between survey sites and, for some species, were clearly linked to differences in benthic<br />

composition. Vagabond Butterfly fish (Chaetodon vagabundus) are associated with<br />

turbid ‘dead’ sites where they feed on a range <strong>of</strong> foods including coral, algae, and<br />

anemones. Kleins Butterfly fish (Chaetodon kleinii) feed on s<strong>of</strong>t corals as well as algae<br />

and zooplankton. Both <strong>of</strong> these species <strong>of</strong> Butterfly fish were recorded on transects at site<br />

three, a mixed habitat dominated by s<strong>of</strong>t corals. In contrast, Chevron Butterfly fish


(Chaetodon trifascialus) are closely associated with tabular and branching forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Acropora but were also found at low abundance levels at this site. Other species <strong>of</strong><br />

Butterfly fish that are commonly closely associated with rich coral habitats such as<br />

Redfin Butterfly fish (Chaetodon trifasciatus) were found at site two only. The abundant<br />

wrasse and goat fish populations found at all surveyed sites suggest the presence <strong>of</strong> rich<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> small benthic invertebrates. Recorded abundance <strong>of</strong> groupers was<br />

generally low for all sites surveyed. However, this may be due to the methodology used<br />

to collect this data. Groupers <strong>of</strong>ten shelter under rocks or in holes making them difficult<br />

to spot while swimming along the reef.<br />

Invertebrate communities were found to be more abundant and diverse on mixed<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t and scleractinian coral reefs such as site 3. Site 3 supported many species <strong>of</strong> sea<br />

cucumber including edible species. In addition, gastropods which are <strong>of</strong>ten collected for<br />

the marine curio trade, such as cowries, were frequently recorded on survey transects. A<br />

range <strong>of</strong> different nudibranch species were observed on all survey sites, and further<br />

secondary data collection would reveal the level <strong>of</strong> species diversity present.<br />

Sites found to be <strong>of</strong> particularly conservation importance are:<br />

• The Acropora dominated reef flat, crest and slope found along the west side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

island extending from the shore out to 12m depth, a distance <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

100m.<br />

• In addition, there were reports from other environmental organisations operating in<br />

the area that dynamite fishing had been carried out at sites around Nyororo <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> this highly destructive fishing technique will have serious repercussions<br />

for the health and biodiversity <strong>of</strong> reefs. Further research is needed to ascertain the<br />

levels at which this is occurring.<br />

B. SIMR<br />

SIMR is the reserve area which seems <strong>of</strong> least importance to local fishers due to<br />

its unsuitability for temporary camps. It is also <strong>of</strong> the highest importance for the tourism


industry as it is highly regarded for its natural beauty, good diving and snorkelling, and<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> black tip sharks and turtles. The coral reef extends for over 2.5km around<br />

the east and north <strong>of</strong> the island at a distance <strong>of</strong> around 1km, and encloses shallow<br />

seagrass beds. At its maximum the coral reef is 100m wide. There is a channel (4 to 6m<br />

deep) running from the north-west <strong>of</strong> the reserve area towards NIMR. The channel area<br />

begins at the north-western extent <strong>of</strong> the coral reef and is approximately 0.5km in width.<br />

To the north <strong>of</strong> the reef, near the channel, is a small patch reef surrounded by sand<br />

substrates. The western side <strong>of</strong> the island is experiencing rapid erosion <strong>of</strong> the shoreline.<br />

According to anecdotal evidence, the island has reduced in width by nearly two-thirds<br />

over the past ten years. As testimony to this, there are many large tree trunks lying in the<br />

water and on the beach along the western shore.<br />

The reef at SIMR is comprised <strong>of</strong> a mixed coral community based on an eroded<br />

coral rag and sandstone base. A discernable reef edge is present along most <strong>of</strong> the reef<br />

with a short vertical section <strong>of</strong>ten present on the deepest reef margins from 5m down to<br />

10-12m deep. In places the coral reef is replaced by rubble slopes running down from the<br />

shallow seagrass habitats to the outer reef edge. They generally are no more than 30m in<br />

width. The conditions experienced at SIMR were less turbid than those observed at<br />

MBIMR, but visibility was still generally low and the reef was primarily dominated by<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t corals (21.32% +/- SE 1.95%). The main growth morphologies <strong>of</strong> scleractinian corals<br />

were found to be massive (4.88% +/- SE 0.66%), and branching (5.32% +/- SE 1.41%).<br />

In addition, all other growth forms were recorded, but at less than 1% average cover. On<br />

the deeper reef margins, particularly at the north-eastern corner <strong>of</strong> the reef where it is at<br />

its widest, large Porities colonies were found, many <strong>of</strong> them over 4m in diameter.<br />

Fish abundance on the reef at SIMR was not at the same level as observed on<br />

coral rich habitats at sites in NIMR, but there was greater diversity <strong>of</strong> species. The most<br />

abundant reef fish observed on the coral reef at SIMR were Dash and Dot Goatfish<br />

(Parupeneus barberinus) and Striped Bristletooth (Ctenochaetus striatus). Five species <strong>of</strong><br />

butterfly fish were recorded, including Redfin (C. trifasciatus), which are commonly<br />

associated with coral rich habitats, and Vagabond (C. vagabundus), which are found in<br />

turbid ‘dead’ sites. In total, 32 <strong>of</strong> the 55 reef fish species looked for were recorded on


transects. Commercial fish species were looked for during surveys in 33 categories<br />

including specific species and family groups, <strong>of</strong> these categories, 23 were recorded at<br />

SIMR. High abundances were recorded for Snappers, Trevallys, Parrotfish, and<br />

Sweetlips, although the highest levels were observed for fish such as Goatfish,<br />

Surgeonfish, and Fusiliers. Large numbers <strong>of</strong> Blue Spot String Rays were seen during<br />

survey dives, and this is in part recorded on the commercial fish data. However, rays are<br />

generally found on the sandy substrate around the edge <strong>of</strong> the reef and are likely to be<br />

under-recorded as swims were conducted primarily above coral rock substrates. The<br />

diverse benthic community found on the reef at SIMR clearly provides suitable habitat<br />

for a wide range <strong>of</strong> fish species, and is therefore <strong>of</strong> high ecological importance.<br />

The seagrass flats at SIMR are extensive, and are similar in composition to those<br />

found at MBIMR, although seem to support slightly lower invertebrate and fish numbers.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the data collected on fish abundance on seagrass beds around SIMR<br />

demonstrates the importance <strong>of</strong> these habitats for commercially important food fish<br />

species, particularly juvenile emperor species.<br />

Sites found to be <strong>of</strong> particularly conservation importance are:<br />

• The reserve area as a whole provides key habitat for highly threatened and<br />

ecologically important species <strong>of</strong> shark and turtle. It is therefore recommended that<br />

the entire site should be considered as <strong>of</strong> high importance. As previously stated,<br />

the island cannot provide a site as a fishermen’s base, and is unsuitable for any<br />

form <strong>of</strong> tourism other than for day trips. The site is likely to be highly susceptible<br />

to disturbance; damage to one type <strong>of</strong> habitat or ecosystem or over-fishing <strong>of</strong> a key<br />

species could have serious repercussions for the reserve as a whole. It is therefore<br />

recommended that the island, its shallow and deep seagrass beds, and surrounding<br />

coral reef should be considered as a single core zone. Complete protection <strong>of</strong> this<br />

site would provide the necessary refugia for endangered species and provide an<br />

intact source reef which is able to supply recruits to surrounding reefs.


C. MBIMR<br />

MBIMR is the smallest <strong>of</strong> the three reserve areas. In addition to the island itself,<br />

there are extensive shallow seagrass habitats, deep seagrass habitat, and a s<strong>of</strong>t coral<br />

dominated reef. The shallow seagrass beds cover the entire area between the reef and the<br />

island, an area extending for more than 3km 2 . The reef curves around the east and north<br />

<strong>of</strong> the island at a distance <strong>of</strong> 1km, and is situated on a highly eroded coral rag and<br />

sandstone base which extends for over 2km in length.<br />

The coral reef habitats which were found in MBIMR are dominated by s<strong>of</strong>t corals<br />

(31.55% +/- SE 0.88%) with a very low coverage <strong>of</strong> scleractinian corals (7.55% +/- SE<br />

1.33%). This is likely to be due to the turbid environmental conditions frequently<br />

experienced at MBIMR which result in very low light levels and high sedimentation.<br />

Scleractinian corals found were mainly massive, sub-massive, and encrusting forms. Due<br />

to its diversity <strong>of</strong> benthic organisms MBIMR supports an abundant community <strong>of</strong> benthic<br />

invertebrates. This includes Crown Of Thorn Starfish (COTS) which is in contrast to the<br />

other surveyed sites. COTS were found on just over half <strong>of</strong> the transects completed at<br />

MBIMR (0.53 +/- SE 0.13), whereas only a single COTS was recorded on all transects<br />

completed for the other two reserves.<br />

The shallow and deep seagrass habitats in MBIMR are both extensive, and<br />

ecologically rich. Five species <strong>of</strong> seagrass were identified from the shallow habitats. The<br />

seagrass habitats provide important nursery sites which supports fish populations,<br />

particularly juvenile Emperors. In addition, they have relatively high numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

commercially important species such as edible sea cucumbers and cowries.<br />

Sites found to be <strong>of</strong> particularly conservation importance are:<br />

• The shallow seagrass habitats found at MBIMR form a unique and diverse<br />

ecosystem which supports many invertebrate species at risk from over-collection.<br />

The sites examined do not appear to be subject to more than minimal levels <strong>of</strong>


damage at present, but if further use is made <strong>of</strong> the island, monitoring needs to be<br />

put in place to ensure that run-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> pollutants does not cause greater problems.<br />

• The use <strong>of</strong> the island and reef sites by fishermen engaged in commercial lobster<br />

fishing needs to be monitored to ensure that fishing levels do not exceed<br />

sustainable levels.<br />

D. Revisions to reserve boundaries<br />

It is recommended that revisions to the reserve boundaries for all three reserve<br />

areas are made in order to ensure that ecologically important habitats are included within<br />

the reserve areas. Site connectivity means that reef and seagrass habitats within the<br />

reserve areas are likely to have close associations in terms <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> feeding,<br />

breeding, shelter, and nursery areas with many species moving between sites on a daily or<br />

seasonal basis. In addition, a clearly defined reserve boundary which includes the whole<br />

<strong>of</strong> the shallow reef and seagrass areas is easier to manage as confusion is avoided over<br />

whether particular sites are included inside the reserve area. Preservation <strong>of</strong> local<br />

ecosystems in their entirety will therefore help to ensure that conservation actions are<br />

effective from both ecological and management perspectives.<br />

The following reserve boundary revisions are thus recommended:<br />

Nyororo <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve:<br />

1) Lat 7° 35’ 24”S, Long 39° 40’ 20”E<br />

2) Lat 7° 36’ 00”S, Long 39° 42’ 44”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 37’ 00”S, Long 39° 44’ 24”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 39’ 30”S, Long 39° 43’ 70”E<br />

5) Lat 7° 39’ 30”S, Long 39° 40’ 20”E<br />

Shungimbili <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> Reserve:<br />

1) Lat 7° 42’ 60”S, Long 39° 41’ 60”E


2) Lat 7° 41’ 50”S, Long 39° 42’ 10”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 41’ 70”S, Long 39° 40’ 70”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 42’ 10”S, Long 39° 40’ 50”E<br />

5) Lat 7° 42’ 50”S, Long 39° 40’ 50”E<br />

Mbarakuni <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Reserves</strong>:<br />

1) Lat 7° 42’ 40”S, Long 39° 44’ 30”E<br />

2) Lat 7° 42’ 40”S, Long 39° 46’ 00”E<br />

3) Lat 7° 43’ 70”S, Long 39° 46’ 00”E<br />

4) Lat 7° 43’ 70”S, Long 39° 44’ 30”E


VI. Appendices<br />

Appendix 1. Fish species list.<br />

Common<br />

Name<br />

Latin Name Nyororo Shungimbili Mbarakuni<br />

Sargent major Abudefduf vaigiensis x<br />

Eyestripe<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Acanthurus<br />

dussumieri<br />

x<br />

Black surgeonfish Acanthurus gahhm x x x<br />

Powder-blue<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Acanthurus<br />

leucosternon<br />

x<br />

Lietenant<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Acanthurus tennenti x<br />

Thompson’s<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Acanthurus<br />

thompsoni x x x<br />

Convict<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Acanthus triostegus x<br />

Skunk aneomefish Amphiprion<br />

akallopisos<br />

x x<br />

False clown<br />

anenomefish<br />

Amphirion ocelloris x x<br />

Nose stripe clown<br />

fish<br />

Amphriprion<br />

akallopsois x<br />

Two bar clown<br />

anenomefish<br />

Amphriprion allardi x<br />

Bluespotted<br />

wrasse<br />

Anampses<br />

caeruleopunctatus<br />

x x<br />

Three spot Apolemichthys<br />

Angelfish trimaculatus<br />

Masked puffer Arothron diadematus x<br />

Star puffer Arothron stellatus x x<br />

Titan triggerfish<br />

Balistoides<br />

viridescens<br />

x x x<br />

Needlefish Belonidae spp x<br />

Yellowback<br />

fusilier<br />

Caesio teres x x<br />

Crown toby<br />

Canthigaster<br />

coronata<br />

x x<br />

Bar jack Carangoides ferdau x<br />

Two-spined /<br />

Dusky Angelfish<br />

Centropyge<br />

bispinosus<br />

x x<br />

Peacock Grouper Cephalopholis argus x x<br />

Coral Hind<br />

Grouper<br />

Cephalopholis<br />

miniata<br />

x<br />

Sixspot Grouper<br />

Cephalopholis<br />

sexmaculata<br />

Threadfin<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon auriga x x x<br />

Bennett’s<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon bennetti<br />

Blackburn’s Chaetodon


Butterflyfish blackburni<br />

Saddleback<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon falcula<br />

Spotted<br />

Chaetodon<br />

Butterflyfish guttatissimus<br />

Klein’s<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon kleinii x<br />

Somali<br />

Chaetodon<br />

Butterflyfish leucopleura<br />

Lined<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon lineolatus x<br />

Raccoon<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon lunula x x x<br />

Black-backed<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon<br />

melannotus<br />

x x<br />

Meyer’s<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon meyeri<br />

Crown<br />

Chaetodon<br />

Butterflyfish paucifasciatus<br />

Chevron<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon<br />

trifascialus<br />

x x<br />

Redfin<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon<br />

trifasciatus<br />

x x<br />

Teardrop<br />

Chaetodon<br />

Butterflyfish unimaculatus<br />

Vagabond<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon<br />

vagabundus<br />

x x<br />

Yellowhead<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Chaetodon<br />

xanthocephalus<br />

x<br />

Zanzibar<br />

Chaetodon<br />

Butterflyfish zanzibariensis<br />

Blacktip reef<br />

shark<br />

Charcharhinus<br />

melanopterus x<br />

Cigar wrasse Chelio inermis x x<br />

Twotone chromis<br />

Chromis dimediata x<br />

Threespot chromis Chromis nerator x<br />

Footballer<br />

demoiselle<br />

Chrysiptera annulata x x<br />

Bluespeckled<br />

prawn goby<br />

Cryptocentrus<br />

caeruleomaculatus x x<br />

Two spot<br />

bristletooth<br />

Ctenochaetus<br />

binotatus<br />

x x x<br />

Striped<br />

bristletooth<br />

Ctenochaetus striatus x x x<br />

Goldring<br />

bristletooth<br />

Ctenochaetus<br />

strigosus<br />

x x x<br />

Domino dascyllus Dacyllus<br />

trimaculatus<br />

x<br />

Humbug dascyllus Dascyllus arunanus x x<br />

Bluespotted<br />

stingray<br />

Dasyatis kuhlii x x x<br />

Slatey Sweetlips Diagramma pictum x<br />

Slingjaw wrasse Epibulus insidiator x x x


Whitespotted Epinephelus<br />

Grouper<br />

caeruleopunctatus<br />

Big Long-nosed Forcipiger<br />

Butterflyfish longirostris<br />

Indian Ocean Bird<br />

wrasse<br />

Gomphosus<br />

caeruleus<br />

x x x<br />

Checkerboard<br />

wrasse<br />

Haliochoeres<br />

hortulanus x x x<br />

Threespot<br />

damselfish<br />

Hemigymnus<br />

fasciatatus x x<br />

Barred thicklip<br />

wrasse<br />

Hemigymnus<br />

fasciatus x x<br />

Black Pyramid<br />

Butterflyfish<br />

Hemitaurichthys<br />

zoster<br />

x<br />

Longfin<br />

Bannerfish<br />

Heniochus<br />

acuminatus<br />

x x x<br />

Masked<br />

Bannerfish<br />

Heniochus<br />

monoceros<br />

x<br />

Barred flagtail Kuhlia mugil x<br />

Blue – streaked<br />

cleaner wrasse<br />

Labroides dimidiatus x x<br />

Seagrass<br />

parrotfish<br />

Leptoscerus<br />

vaigiensis x<br />

Blackspot<br />

Emperor<br />

Lethrinus harak x x<br />

Spangled Emperor Lethrinus nebulosus<br />

Longface Emperor Lethrinus olivaceus x<br />

Red Snapper Lutjanus bohar x x<br />

Blackspot Snapper Lutjanus ehrenbergi x x<br />

Bluelined Snapper Lutjanus kasmira<br />

Black snapper Macolor niger x<br />

Ornate wrasse<br />

Marcophoryngodon<br />

cyanoguttatus<br />

x<br />

Mozambique<br />

fangblenny<br />

Meiacanthus<br />

mocambici<br />

x<br />

Bigeye Emperor<br />

Monotaxis<br />

grandoculus<br />

x<br />

Yellow boxfish Ostracion cubicus x x<br />

Longnose filefish<br />

Oxymonacanthus<br />

longirostris<br />

x<br />

Palette<br />

surgeonfish<br />

Paracanthus hepatus<br />

Dash-and-dot<br />

goatfish<br />

Parupeneus<br />

barberinus<br />

x x x<br />

Yellowsaddle<br />

goatfish<br />

Parupeneus<br />

cyclostomus<br />

x x x<br />

Longbarbel<br />

goatfish<br />

Parupeneus<br />

macronema<br />

x x x<br />

Pinnate spadefish Platax pinnatus x x<br />

Goldspotted<br />

Sweetlips<br />

Plectorhinchus<br />

flavomaculatus<br />

x x<br />

Blackspotted<br />

Sweetlips<br />

Plectorhinchus<br />

gaterinus<br />

x x


Oriental Sweetlips Plectorhinchus<br />

orientalis<br />

x<br />

Black Sweetlips<br />

Plectorhinchus<br />

sordidus<br />

x<br />

Jewel damselfish<br />

Plectroglyphidon<br />

lacrymatus<br />

x<br />

Saddleback coral<br />

Grouper<br />

Plectropomus laevis x<br />

Ear-spot angelfish Pomacanthus<br />

chrysurus<br />

Emperor angelfish Pomacanthus<br />

imperator<br />

Yellowbar<br />

angelfish<br />

Pomacanthus<br />

maculosus<br />

x x x<br />

Oldwoman<br />

angelfish<br />

Pomacanthus<br />

rhomboides<br />

x<br />

Semicircle<br />

angelfish<br />

Pomacanthus<br />

semicirculatus<br />

x x x<br />

Crescent tail<br />

bigeye<br />

Priacanthus hamrur x<br />

Gulf damselfish<br />

Pristotis<br />

jobtusirostris<br />

x x<br />

Dottybacks Pseudochromis spp x x<br />

Twinstripe fusilier Pterocaesio marri x x<br />

Lionfish Pterois volitans x<br />

Regal Angelfish<br />

Pygoplites<br />

diacanthus<br />

x<br />

Wedge picass<strong>of</strong>ish Rhinecanthus<br />

rectangulus<br />

x<br />

Crown squirrelfish Sargocentron<br />

diadema<br />

x<br />

Bullethead<br />

parrotfish<br />

Scarus sordidus x x<br />

Thumbprint<br />

Spinecheek<br />

Scolopsis<br />

bimaculatus<br />

x x<br />

Halfmoon<br />

triggerfish<br />

Sufflamen<br />

chrysopterus<br />

x x<br />

Redband<br />

lizardfish<br />

Synodus variegatus x<br />

Bluesspotted<br />

ribbontail ray<br />

Taeniura lymna x x<br />

Sixbar wrasse<br />

Thalassoma<br />

hardwicke<br />

x x x<br />

Goldbar wrasse<br />

Thalassoma<br />

hebraicum<br />

x x x<br />

Blackspotted<br />

electric ray<br />

Torpedo<br />

fuscomaculata<br />

x<br />

Moorish Idol Zanclus cornutus x x x<br />

Brushtail tang Zebrasoma scopes x x x<br />

Sailfin Tang Zerasoma desjardinii x x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!