Something Different: A pilot study evaluating family outreach ...
Something Different: A pilot study evaluating family outreach ...
Something Different: A pilot study evaluating family outreach ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Something</strong> <strong>Different</strong> - Page 12 of 47<br />
experience can also be seen in the personal meaning map that Tina completed on the day of<br />
the visit (see Figure below).<br />
Figure 3: 'Tina' Pre-visit Personal Meaning Map<br />
Tina’s personal meaning map above is particularly interesting for the elements that<br />
are not directly negative. First the statement that the Fitzwilliam Museum is “something for<br />
children of school age or people interested in history” is notable for excluding her from the<br />
concept of ‘who the museum is for’. Also interesting is Tina’s perception that the museum is<br />
“something everyone should visit and learn about and respect”. This view that museum<br />
visiting is a worthy activity was offset by negative perceptions of the museum as a boring and<br />
at the same time hostile place governed by “silence” and judgement. This negative perception<br />
aligns with the working class perception of museums identified in Bourdieu and Darbel’s<br />
(1991/1969) <strong>study</strong> 2 .<br />
Demonstrating that the negative perceptions of the museum were not immutable, Tina<br />
showed a clear shift in her thinking about the Fitzwilliam Museum as a result of a single<br />
2 See Discussion section below for consideration of the continuing applicability of this research within the<br />
contemporary museum context. In sum, Bourdieu and Darbel (1991/1969) identified negative patterns and<br />
outcomes of museum visiting, which museum practitioners have sought to overcome in the four decades since<br />
the <strong>study</strong> was published. There is at least some evidence in this <strong>study</strong> that their overall conclusions may need<br />
updating, while some of their empirical and conceptual observations may still hold.