Asbestos SurveyReport - Former Fort Ord - Environmental Cleanup

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ASUt51US ZUHVkT Mtt’UH[ CORPS OF ENGINEERS - FORT ORD INSTALLATION Several buildings included in the scope of work did not exist at the time of the survey and are Iisled below. p0002a TO0830 T02602 -ro3c)54 P05987 T09353 100497 TO0924 T02870A T04215 P05989 T09354 PO0530 T02057 T03051 P04379 T09042 T09377 TOOW1 P02077 T03053 Po47a5 T09352 T09432 Site plans reflect a structure’s location on the date it was surveyed. Several Range and Remote area structures were relocated after their suwey date. Buildings suweyed prior to the stafl of the October 1991 facility-wide sutvey which have been subsequently destroyed are included on the site plans. Approximately 552 buildings and stnmtures not included in the original scope of work were identified as havirlg suspect asbestos-containing materials during a drive-by reconnaissance of the entire Fort Ord property. Many of the structures identified were not included in a building inventory maintained by the Real Prope~ branch of the Directorate of Engineering and Housing (DEI-1). These additional structures were either unnumbered or had numbers assigned to them by the Directorate of Logistics (DOL). Unnumbered buildings were assigned a “DEI” number. The locations of the DOL and DEI numbered structures are listed in Table 5. Structures such as grease racks and drainage fields that are included in the Real Property inventory of buildings were initially surveyed to determine the likelihood of asbestoscontaining materials being present in these structures. Once it was determined that these structures contained no suspect materials, they were eliminated from the field investigation, Structures with suspect materials were suweyed and are included in the Building Information section of this repoti. The following building numbers were listed on individual “Hand Receipt” inventories maintained by Real Property. After contact was made with the individual responsible for each of the buildings and/or an efforl to physically locate the buildings failed, it was determined that these buildings do not exist. 00187 00379 03814 03904A 03920 03938 03958 09282 1A119 1A013 1A045 1A050 1A072 1A074 1A080 1A082 1A083 1A084 2U6 Unknown Usa~e 2A27 MOUT Range - Range Storage Fixed Ammunitn Range Storage Range Storage MOUT Range 2A38 3A23 Mgzn 3A28 3A29 3A30 4B35 Covered T&ining Area 4B56 Range Storage 4B66 Storage 4B67 Range Storage lTA401 Range Storage llA421 Range Storage lTA423 Range Storage 7TA425 Range Storage 17A431 Range Storage lTA441 Range Storage lTA551 Range Storage 7TA553 Range Storage l-rA601 Range Storage Range Storage Observation Tower Obsewation Tower Observation Tower Obsewation Tower Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Fie!d Range Latrine lTA603 lTA605 lTA607 lTA609 lTA621 lTA623 TrA681 lTA701 lTA721 lTA723 lTA741 17A811 lTA831 lTAB32 lTAa33 -1-TAB34 lTA851 Field Range Latrine Field Range fatrine Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range latrine Field Range Mrine Field Range ktrine Field Range latrine Field Range latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range ktrine Field Range htrine .Field Range Latrine Field Range Latrine Field Range btrine Field Range IArine Field Range Latrine There were several Remote area structures sumeyed in which no suspect asbestos-containing materials were obse~ed. Samples were not collected in these stmctures. In addition, many Remote and Contonement area structures sutveyed had roofs composed of materials (metal, wood, or dirt) in which no suspect asbestos-containing materials were obsemed. See Table 2 later in this section for a listing of structures in which no asbestos-cmtaining materials were detected. DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING INC. VOLUME 1-3 PROJECT NO. 1A2141A8001
J . -. J --, , /nsDect ion and Samding ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CORPS OF ENGINEERS - FoRT ORD INSTALLATION Typical suspect materials sampled include, but are not limited to, the following: surfacing materials (sprayed or troweled-on structural members, ceilings, and walls, such as fireproofing, thermal insulation, acoustic or decorative materials); thermal system insulation (pipe, boiler, tank, equipment, duct or other HVAC insulation materials); and miscellaneous materials (construction materials for roofs, ceilings, floor and walls, such as tiles/panels, sheeting, wallboardfioint compound, paints, coatings and roofing materials). Destructive inspection methods to find concealed asbestos are used only in those areas specified by the COE. Areas suweyed include basements, attics, closets, crawl spaces, living and work spaces, roofs, ceiling cavities, air plenums, and boiler, furnace, and mechanical rooms. DEI typically suweys buildings in teams of two, one person documenting the proceedings of the suwey, the other performing bulk sampling and other miscellaneous activities. The team performs a preliminary visual inspection of the building and site to identify and quantify suspect ACM. A sampling strategy is then developed 10 provide representative sampling. Each sample is placed in a container, the container is sealed, labeled and placed in a storage bag. Samples are documented by entering the sample data, including a description of the material, sample number, location, condition, accessibili~, friability and quantity, on a bulk log. The sample location is marked on pre-approved forms (typically 8-1/2 x 11 inch not-tucale floor plans). In addition, a photograph is taken to futiher. document the sampled material, its condition and location. Throughout the process, special care is taken to prevent cross-contamination of the collected samples, Sampling equipment is cleaned before and after each sample is obtained. In addition, sample containers are placed directly beneath each sample location, when feasible, to collect any materials which may become dislodged during the sampling process. Any debris generated by th sampling is cleaned by wet-cleaning methods. Sample locations are appropriately repaired. c Laboratow Pro@.LI res and Resul& Upon the completion of the building survey, Chain-of-Custody forms are completed and the samples are transferred 10 DEI’s in-house laboratory, Hygeia Environmental Laboratories Inc. (Hygeia), for analysis. Bulk sample analysis is conducted by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining as described in the “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samplesm, Method EPA-600/M4-82-020 (Federal RegisterfVolume 47, No. 103, May 27, 19B2). A suspect material is immersed in a solution of known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The colors displayed enable mineral identification. Once analyzed, results are entered on bulk logs and delivered 10 the suwey team leader for inclusion in the report. Quality Control samples are sent to a second Hygeia laborato~ for reanalysis. Should there be discrepancies in the analysis results, the Los Angeles-based Hygek lab will do a reanalysis of the sample(s). DEI will then use the third set of results in the repott. NOTE: The amended National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), November 20, 1990, regulation included a requirement that when the asbestos content of a bulk sample material is determined using procedures outlined in the interim method (40 CFR Part 762, Appendix A to Subpafi F), and the asbestos content is estimated to be less than 10% by a method other than Point Counting, the parlies legally responsible for a building (owner/operator) may (1) elect to assume the amount to be greater than 1% and treat the material as a regulated asbestos-containing matetial, or (2) require verification of the amount by the Point Counting method. The purpose of this procedure is to minimize false negative analysis (reporting the sample as containing less than 1% asbestos for asbestos-containing samples actually containing greater than 1Yo) and false positives (repofiing the sample as containing greater than 1Y. asbestos for samples actually containing less than 1% asbestc Point Counting was included in NESHAP in response to an EPA study that found an unaccepta~. amount of false negative and false positive analyses by methods outlined in the interim method. DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING INC. VOLUME 1-4 PROJECT NO. 1A2141ABO01 ;; l;. ,;,. ;.’!1
Page 1 and 2: Appendix A: Asbestos SurveyReport
Page 3 and 4: -7s Diagnostic Environmental Inc. s
Page 5 and 6: \ .) ---- . i & .’ VOLUME 4- BUIL
Page 7 and 8: VOLUME 7- BUILDINGS (CONTINUED) JQ
Page 9 and 10: ___ > VOLUME 12- m P01495 P01497 T0
Page 11 and 12: VOLUME 17-BUILDINGS u w T01907 Otic
Page 13 and 14: +. -. VOLUME 22- BUILDINGS ML P0206
Page 15 and 16: VOLUME 27- BUILDINGS (CONTINUED) m
Page 19 and 20: .- .-. j -- s VOLUME 39- U T02850 T
Page 23 and 24: ,. ~.>- “’”9 VOLUME 49- BUILD
Page 25 and 26: . .)“.. VOLUME 54- NQ P04527 S045
Page 27 and 28: -—, “) L; i VOLUME 59- M24 T083
Page 29 and 30: ‘) --. ) VOLUME 63- BUILDINGS ML
Page 31 and 32: d’ t VOLUME 66- BUILDINGS (CONTIN
Page 33: TO1940 T01968 Pol 997 T01941 TO1942
Page 37 and 38: ... , -. “.-. ID ASBESTOS SURVEY
Page 39 and 40: . ‘1 .- ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CO
Page 41 and 42: ● ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CORPS OF
Page 43 and 44: “) ;} +. .-+ > ASBESTOS SURVEY RE
Page 45 and 46: ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CORPS OF ENG
Page 47 and 48: “-. 1 —- * ASBESTOS SURVEY REPO
Page 49 and 50: “) , ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CORPS
Page 51 and 52: .. .. ) j - ., ASBESTOS SURVEY REPO
Page 53 and 54: ● &SBESToS SUR~EV REPORT CORPS OF
Page 55 and 56: ., k ;) -.’-- -’ WorkItem DEI R
Page 57 and 58: ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT CORPS OF ENG
Page 59: 9 3A14 4A11 4A13 4A1B 4A19 4A21 4A2

Asbestos SurveyReport - Former Fort Ord - Environmental Cleanup

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?