Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
Application 124771 - Ministry of Fisheries
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8<br />
Goodwin E, 2012. Assessment <strong>of</strong> Benthic and Water Column Effects from Inshore<br />
Coromandel Mussel Farms. Prepared for a Collective <strong>of</strong> Coromandel Mussel<br />
Farmers. Cawthron Institute.<br />
4.4.2 It is considered that the one hectare extension would have a less than minor<br />
impact over and above the effects from the existing consented farm.<br />
4.4.3 It is also considered that the cumulative effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed farm extension<br />
on plants, animals and habitat disturbance will be less than minor, given the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the farm, the proposed density <strong>of</strong> lines and the existing operations.<br />
4.4.4 With regard to water quality, the mussel farming industry is subject to various<br />
stringent requirements (including food and health standards which are set by NZ’s<br />
Health Authorities and are consistent with USA and EU standards). Therefore the<br />
water and shellfish quality would be regularly checked to ensure they meet these<br />
health standards.<br />
4.4.5 With regard to fishing, there would be no known impacts on customary or<br />
commercial fishing in this in-shore area. While recreational fishing is commonly<br />
known to be enhanced by the presence <strong>of</strong> marine farms.<br />
Carrying Capacity and Phytoplankton<br />
4.4.6 In relation to the effects on phytoplankton, reference is made to the attached<br />
scientific report (Appendix 2) and the report: Taylor D, Clark D, Keeley N and<br />
Goodwin E, 2012. Assessment <strong>of</strong> Benthic and Water Column Effects from Inshore<br />
Coromandel Mussel Farms. Prepared for a Collective <strong>of</strong> Coromandel Mussel<br />
Farmers. Cawthron Institute. In addition it is noted that in the past 10 years or<br />
more <strong>of</strong> monitoring undertaken by NIWA at Wilsons Bay, there have been no<br />
significant issues recorded in terms <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton depletion.<br />
4.4.7 The overall small size <strong>of</strong> the existing farm along with the proposed line layouts for<br />
the extension to the marine farm will ensure that there is sufficient water flow to<br />
the mussel lines to provide adequate quantities <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton. There is<br />
unlikely to be any material effect on phytoplankton much beyond the boundaries<br />
<strong>of</strong> the farm and therefore no impact on the nutrient supplies available to any<br />
nearby farms.<br />
4.4.8 It is therefore considered that the one hectare extension would have a less than<br />
minor impact over and above the effects from the existing consented farm.<br />
Benthic Assessment<br />
4.4.9 In relation to the effects on benthic communities, reference is made to the<br />
attached scientific report (Appendix 2) and the report: Taylor D, Clark D, Keeley N<br />
and Goodwin E, 2012. Assessment <strong>of</strong> Benthic and Water Column Effects from<br />
8