15.11.2013 Views

Regional Geology, Sioux Lookout Orogenic Belt - Geology Ontario

Regional Geology, Sioux Lookout Orogenic Belt - Geology Ontario

Regional Geology, Sioux Lookout Orogenic Belt - Geology Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pillows are locally abundant and form laterally continuous units. Physical volcanological details<br />

include: 1) concentric layering within pillows (or pillow tubes?); 2) pillow budding (lateral sequential<br />

development of pillows via breached margins); 3) downward pointing keels; 4) thin selvages; 5) vesicles<br />

(recording exsolution of gas in a shallow water environment); 6) large (1 m) pillows; 7) pillow breccia<br />

(flow top breccia, plus some flow margin or flow snout rubble facies); 8) one example of a flow with<br />

pillow imbrication (pillows were rolled forward, flow to the south); 9) spalled--off hyaloclastic pillow rims;<br />

10) rare concentric zonation of varioles within pillows; and 11) rare gabbroic areas (co--magmatic dikes?).<br />

Pillow structures are characteristic of subaqueous flows, and are usually assumed to be marine<br />

deposits. For parts of this western andesitic succession, the possibility of a lacustrine paleoenvironment for<br />

the pillowed flows merits consideration. It is well known that volcanic eruptions often disturb fluvial<br />

drainage and create lakes (e.g., Cas and Wright 1987). This situation would allow for a minor amount of<br />

subaqueous units within a predominantly subaerial succession. Alternatively, this predominantly<br />

volcaniclastic succession may have been submerged by marine transgressions during some periods of<br />

mafic--intermediate (basaltic andesite) flow deposition.<br />

OTHER LITHOLOGIES<br />

Quartz porphyry dikes with coarse (0.5–1 cm) phenocrysts, and some finer--grained felsic to granitic dikes,<br />

are rare.<br />

The absolute age of these felsic dikes is unknown, but the quartz porphyry dikes appear to cross--cut<br />

the youngest pyroclastic unit in the Northeast Bay area. It would be of interest to see whether these dikes<br />

correspond to a younger stage of more felsic volcanism (e.g., Stage 4), or are related to postvolcanic<br />

granitic intrusions (e.g., Stage 6; for stages, se below). In the latter case, the dikes might record the<br />

“stitching together” of components of the orogenic belt by granitic intrusions.<br />

Rocks identified during the present study as coarse--grained mafic--intermedite volcanic rocks and a<br />

very different looking coarse intrusive trondjhemite--diorite were all classed as “diorite” by Johnston<br />

(1972). A brief description of the dioritic intrusive body in the Northeast Bay area is given below.<br />

Johnston (1972) grouped mafic pillow breccia with intermediate tuff--breccia as “mafic--intermediate<br />

agglomerate”. Distinction of these lithologies by Devaney et al. (1995b) improves stratigraphic resolution<br />

of this portion of the map area.<br />

Interpretation of Paleoenvironments and Stratigraphic Trends<br />

As also noted in previous preliminary reports (Devaney and Babin 1996, Devaney 1998, 1999a), the<br />

present study interprets the upper andesitic, predominantly pyroclastic succession as proximal to medial,<br />

subaqueous to subaerial deposits with minor sedimentary reworking. Evidence of hot deposition is rare, but<br />

the unreworked nature (e.g., angular clasts, poor sorting, poor stratification) of much of the strata suggests<br />

that they are indeed pyroclastic (or slightly reworked, more equivocal “volcaniclastic” facies), rather than<br />

more fully reworked sedimentary facies. Thin pillowed units are thought to be subaqueous deposits, versus<br />

the thicker units of coarse fragmental facies, most of which are interpreted to be subaerial deposits. The<br />

latter coarse, supposedly subaerial units do not contain features such as mudstone beds or units, exhalite<br />

layers, and common quenched lava fabrics which might indicate a subaqueous paleoenvironment, and do<br />

not contain deposits indicative of shallow water (above wave base) conditions (e.g., wave--formed<br />

structures such as wave ripples, hummocky cross--stratification, and crossbedded shoreface sequences).<br />

Primary structures potentially diagnostic of deposition in a subaerial environment (interpreted above)<br />

include: antidune laminae in pyroclastic surge beds, heat welded rims on blocks, airfall bomb clasts,<br />

subaerial vapour phase crystallization in lapillistone, aa flows lacking quench fabrics, a colluvial talus<br />

wedge adjacent to a mega--block, asymmetric current ripples with paleocurrents approximately to the north<br />

(suggestive of fluvial paleoflow away from the inferred proximal volcanic vent area), and well stratified<br />

fluvial beds with laminated conglomerate (open framework--filling laminae) and notably rounded clasts.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!