19.11.2013 Views

zalambdalestes - American Museum of Natural History

zalambdalestes - American Museum of Natural History

zalambdalestes - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 281<br />

Fig. 21. Stereophotograph <strong>of</strong> the skull <strong>of</strong> cf. Zalambdalestes sp. PSS-MAE 129 in dorsal view, with<br />

accompanying line drawing. Part <strong>of</strong> the endocranial surface <strong>of</strong> the petrosal is exposed. Gray pattern<br />

represents matrix; parallel lines are damaged surfaces. Abbreviations: fr, frontal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal;<br />

pe, petrosal; pmx, premaxilla.<br />

The meaning <strong>of</strong> this canal through the lacrimal<br />

is uncertain, as no such structure exists<br />

among other mammals (Gregory, 1920;<br />

Muller, 1934; personal obs.). Some elephant<br />

shrews (e.g., Macroscelides proboscidens<br />

CM 40789) have a small foramen into the<br />

facial process <strong>of</strong> the lacrimal that must serve<br />

a nutritive function, because it has no orbital<br />

aperture. In extant placentals, a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

nerves and vessels cross the orbital rim to<br />

reach the face (Sisson, 1910; Greene, 1963;<br />

Evans, 1993). The only ones to be enclosed<br />

in bone in some forms are the frontal nerves<br />

and vessels, but this is invariably in the frontal<br />

bone (Sisson, 1910; Williams et al.,<br />

1989). Rather than the frontal bone, these<br />

nerves and vessels may have been enclosed<br />

in the lacrimal in Zalambdalestes. Interestingly,<br />

the frontal bone and postorbital process<br />

(see below) are situated fairly close to<br />

the facial aperture <strong>of</strong> this canal in PSS-MAE<br />

108 (fig. 18) and 135 (fig. 20). For descriptive<br />

purposes, we coin the term ‘‘translacrimal<br />

canal’’ for the structure in Zalambdalestes.<br />

After our discovery <strong>of</strong> the translacrimal<br />

canal in Zalambdalestes, Archibald and Averianov<br />

(2003) reported a very similar structure<br />

for Kulbeckia (fig. 51C). The only significant<br />

difference between the two is that the<br />

passageway in Kulbeckia is much nearer the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!