Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 nd CONGRESSOFTHEEUROPEAN<br />
ASSOCIATIONOFVETERINARY<br />
LABORATORYDIAGNOSTICIANS(EAVLD)<br />
<br />
EAVLD <strong>2012</strong><br />
<br />
<br />
14July,<strong>2012</strong>,KazimierzDolny,Poland<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
organizedbythe<br />
NationalVeterinaryResearchInstitute,Pulawy
TM marks are owned by IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.<br />
<br />
<br />
BVDV Test<br />
A new diagnostic solution to detect bovine viral<br />
diarrhea virus (BVDV) in just 20 minutes.<br />
EU veterinarians estimate that BVDV costs producers<br />
over €25 per head, even after vaccination. 1 Test all new<br />
introductions with the IDEXX SNAP BVDV Test to identify<br />
persistently infected cattle.<br />
The IDEXX SNAP BVDV Test:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To learn more about the<br />
IDEXX SNAP BVDV Test,<br />
visit idexx.com/snapbvdv.<br />
1. Data on fi le at IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook, Maine USA.
Welcome<br />
Dear colleagues,<br />
Welcome to the 2nd EAVLD <strong>congress</strong> in Kazimierz Dolny, hosted by the National Veterinary Research<br />
Institute, Puawy. I am very honoured and proud that our Institute had an opportunity to organize the event.<br />
Nowadays, a constant demand for a higher quality <strong>of</strong> diagnostic services, also a competition on the market<br />
and funding shortages make diagnostic services a hard work. Therefore, the possibility <strong>of</strong> meeting other<br />
specialists in the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary laboratory diagnostics and exchanging <strong>of</strong> eye-to-eye experience are <strong>of</strong><br />
prime importance, which was also marked by the success <strong>of</strong> the 1 st EAVLD <strong>congress</strong>. The sponsors’<br />
response to this <strong>congress</strong> was beyond our expectations and we are pleased that participants will have the<br />
possibility to get acquainted with the variety <strong>of</strong> the latest diagnostic developments during the <strong>congress</strong>.<br />
Despite the economical situation encountered, by the end <strong>of</strong> May, <strong>2012</strong> we had over 170 registered<br />
participants from 26 countries including: Africa, Australia, Europe, North and South America.<br />
Walking in the footsteps <strong>of</strong> the first EAVLD <strong>congress</strong> held in 2010 in Lelystad by the CVI, made our<br />
preparations easier since we had a tremendous and invaluable back-up and advice from Dr. Willie Loeffen,<br />
Secretary <strong>of</strong> the EAVLD and the President <strong>of</strong> the Organizing Committee <strong>of</strong> the EAVLD 2010. At the same<br />
time, we are aware <strong>of</strong> the responsibility and high expectations from the participants due to the positive<br />
feedback from 1 st such an event organized in 2010. Despite recent renovations <strong>of</strong> our Institute and its training<br />
centre both based in Puawy, we had to find another location due to the space limits. We have chosen<br />
Kazimierz Dolny, a town situated nearby Puawy, located at the bank <strong>of</strong> Vistula river. We hope you will<br />
admire town’s beauty and its flavour when visiting different attractions during the <strong>congress</strong> free time.<br />
Myself and the whole Organizing Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>EAVLD<strong>2012</strong></strong> hope that you will find this <strong>congress</strong> interesting<br />
and valuable source <strong>of</strong> the up-to-date knowledge within the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary laboratory diagnostics.<br />
We wish you all the best and enjoy your stay in Kazimierz Dolny and in Puawy, both scientifically and<br />
socially.<br />
Miroslaw P. Polak<br />
The Organizing Committee<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 2 nd EAVLD Congress<br />
Welcome to the second EAVLD <strong>congress</strong> and to the beautiful town <strong>of</strong> Kazimierz Dolny. I hope that you have<br />
time to explore the area and are looking forward to the Polish hospitality!<br />
The <strong>congress</strong> is being held at a time <strong>of</strong> great economic uncertainty for many countries and individuals. As<br />
veterinary diagnosticians we have a duty to continue to make new scientific advances while also working<br />
more efficiently to help reduced costs to governments and animal owners. We will not be able to do this<br />
unless we share ideas and learn from each other. I want to thank you for coming and supporting this<br />
<strong>congress</strong> and also to all our sponsors for helping to make the <strong>congress</strong> possible. Please make the most <strong>of</strong><br />
the commercial exhibition – which must be the most concentrated gatherings <strong>of</strong> companies involved in<br />
veterinary diagnostics in Europe since our last <strong>congress</strong> in 2010!<br />
Please get involved and come to the General meeting on Tuesday at 16.30. If you have ideas for how the<br />
association may be able to better serve its members please speak up at the General Meeting or discuss with<br />
an EAVLD board member.<br />
I wish to especially thank Miroslaw Pawel Polak and the team at National Veterinary Research Institute for all<br />
their hard work in organising this <strong>congress</strong>.<br />
At this meeting I will hand on the presidency <strong>of</strong> the association to Willie Loeffen who was elected as vice<br />
president at the last <strong>congress</strong> in 2010. I want to thank Willie for all the work he has done as secretary over<br />
the last few years and to wish him all the best for his term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice. He will have my full support and I know<br />
that he will do an excellent job as your new EAVLD President.<br />
Andrew Soldan<br />
EAVLD President
KEYNOTE SPEAKERS<br />
General Session<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Wim H.M. van der Poel<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Wim H.M. van der Poel, DVM is senior scientist at the Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands. His research activities have<br />
focussed on veterinary virology, emerging and zoonotic viruses and food borne viruses. He is<br />
also coordinator <strong>of</strong> the EPIZONE European Research Group, the network on epizootic<br />
animal diseases research. Previously, from 1996 to 2004, pr<strong>of</strong> Van der Poel has been<br />
working on research <strong>of</strong> viral zoonoses and food borne viruses at the National Institute for<br />
Public Health and the Environment in Bilthoven, The Netherlands. At this institute, from<br />
2000-2004, he was also heading the National Reference Laboratory for Microbiological<br />
Contamination <strong>of</strong> Bivalve Molluscs. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Van der Poel is a member <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
committees, boards and pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies in the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary virology, and he has<br />
been involved in many national and international research projects on viruses in animals and<br />
foodstuffs. Throughout his career he has published a large number scientific papers and<br />
reviews in this area and he has <strong>of</strong>ten served as an ad hoc reviewer for scientific journals and<br />
granting agencies. In February 2009 he has accepted an honorary visiting chair on Emerging<br />
and Zoonotic Viruses at the University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool, United Kingdom.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. van der Poel graduated in Veterinary Medicine in 1988 and completed his PhD in<br />
veterinary virology at the Utrecht University in 1995. He is a registered specialist in veterinary<br />
microbiology within the Netherlands Royal Veterinary Association and a registered research<br />
worker in medical microbiology within the Netherlands Royal Microbiology Association.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. med. vet. Stefan Schwarz<br />
works in the Institute <strong>of</strong> Farm Animal Genetics <strong>of</strong> the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (= Federal<br />
Research Institute for Animal Health) in Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany. He heads the<br />
research group ‘Molecular Microbiology and Antimicrobial Resistance’ and is involved in both<br />
surveillance <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial resistance and analysis <strong>of</strong> the molecular genetics <strong>of</strong><br />
antimicrobial resistance. He also teaches various academic courses at the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Veterinary Medicine Hannover. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Schwarz is a specialist veterinarian in (a) microbiology,<br />
(b) epidemiology, and (c) molecular genetics and gene technology. He acts as editor/<br />
editorial board member <strong>of</strong> six international journals.<br />
Diagnostics at the point <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
Andrew Soldan<br />
qualified as a veterinary surgeon in 1984 from the Royal Veterinary College, University <strong>of</strong><br />
London and then worked in general mixed practice in Yorkshire, UK for 2 years. Following<br />
the completion <strong>of</strong> an MSc in Tropical Veterinary Medicine at the University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh he<br />
working in Malawi for 5 years and helped set up an epidemiology unit. During this time he<br />
specialised in laboratory diagnosis <strong>of</strong> disease and control methods for tick borne disease in<br />
local cattle. For the latter work he was awarded a Doctorate <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine by the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh. On return from Africa he worked as a government veterinary<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong>ficer before another 3 year spell in mixed practice. In 1999 he started work<br />
for the Veterinary Laboratories Agency and was heavily involved in the laboratory response<br />
to the CSF outbreak in 2000 and the FMD outbreak in 2001. He was head <strong>of</strong> testing for the<br />
VLA for 5 years, was Veterinary Director for 1 year and is currently Commercial Director and<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> AHVLA Scientific for the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />
following its formation in early 2011. Andrew has been involved in the development <strong>of</strong> new<br />
tests and bringing them into routine use in an ISO17025 accredited laboratory. He has also
worked with many diagnostic companies to ensure that new tests developed at the VLA have<br />
been available to international laboratories and end users. He has taken a special interest in<br />
tests that can be used outside a specialist laboratory - possibly informed by his time working<br />
in Africa. Andrew was a founding member <strong>of</strong> EAVLA and its first president.<br />
Emerging, re-emerging and wildlife diseases - diagnostic<br />
possibilities<br />
Dolores Gavier-Widén<br />
is a veterinary pathologist, Head <strong>of</strong> the Research and Development Division, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute (SVA) and Associated<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the Swedish University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. She<br />
obtained her veterinary degree at Buenos Aires University, Argentina, and her MS and PhD<br />
degrees at the University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis. She has worked on diagnosis in combination<br />
with applied research, in particular on infectious diseases <strong>of</strong> wild animals, for more than 25<br />
years, most <strong>of</strong> the time in Sweden and including 40 months <strong>of</strong> work at the Veterinary<br />
Laboratory Agency, Weybridge, England. She is the president <strong>of</strong> the Wildlife Disease<br />
Association (WDA) (www.wildifedisease.org) and past president <strong>of</strong> its Section, the European<br />
WDA. She has participated <strong>of</strong> several EU FP6, FP7 and LIFE projects, such as the current<br />
WildTech project, and also <strong>of</strong> several working groups <strong>of</strong> the European Food Safety Authority<br />
(EFSA) and <strong>of</strong> the OIE ad hoc Group on the validation on diagnostic tests for wildlife, in<br />
2011. She has contributed to the organization <strong>of</strong> several WDA, EWDA and other<br />
conferences, such as Cutting Edge Pathology (European Society <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Pathology), in<br />
2011. Dolores believes that surveillance <strong>of</strong> infectious diseases <strong>of</strong> wildlife is essential to<br />
improve and maintain the health <strong>of</strong> humans, domestic and wild animals.<br />
New techniques in bacteriology, parasitology and pathology<br />
Dr. Markus Kostrzewa<br />
In 1990 Dr. Kostrzewa obtained the Diploma in Biology, University Gießen, Germany, then in<br />
1993 he obtained the title <strong>of</strong> Dr. rer. nat, University Gießen, Germany. He joined Bruker in<br />
1998, where he started as project manager for DNA analysis by MALDI-TOF mass<br />
spectrometry. Later he became the Head <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Clincal Proteomics (“ClinProt”<br />
system, a first mass spectrometry protein pr<strong>of</strong>iling system).<br />
Since 1999 he works in the field <strong>of</strong> MALDI-TOF MS in microbiology. Dr. Kostrzewa initiated<br />
and directed the development <strong>of</strong> microorganism identification by MALDI-TOF mass<br />
spectrometry (“MALDI Biotyper” system). He is heading development <strong>of</strong> clinical applications<br />
for mass spectrometry. Since 2005 he is the Director <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology R&D at Bruker<br />
Daltonics and since <strong>2012</strong> Dr. Kostrzewa is the Vice President <strong>of</strong> Clinical Mass Spectrometry,<br />
R&D at Bruker Daltonics.
Sensitive and reliable animal pathogen detection<br />
QIAGEN veterinary testing solutions<br />
Subheadline optional<br />
can run over 1, 2 or 3 lines.<br />
QuantiFast® Pathogen +IC Kits provide versatile and sensitive detection.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Simultaneous detection <strong>of</strong> viral RNA and DNA<br />
Internal Control for certainty in result interpretation<br />
Universal protocol for standard and fast cyclers<br />
Learn more at www.qiagen.com/QuantiFast<br />
For up-to-date trademarks and disclaimers, see www.qiagen.com.<br />
Sample & Assay Technologies
Products and services<br />
for scientists around the world<br />
The Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency has developed products and services<br />
and makes them available to organisations around the world, through AHVLA Scientific.<br />
For veterinary laboratories these include:<br />
Specialist laboratory reagents and diagnostic kits<br />
Extensive range <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing schemes<br />
Comprehensive bio-imaging service<br />
Unique cell characterisation service<br />
Internationally recognised R & D capability<br />
Laboratory testing services<br />
If you require further information on any products and services,<br />
please contact our Customer Service Team at<br />
ahvlascientific@ahvla.gsi.gov.uk or visit www.ahvlascientific.com
ScientificProgram<br />
DAY1<br />
17:0020:00<br />
19:0021:00<br />
DAY2<br />
08:0010:00<br />
09:0009:30<br />
09:3010:15<br />
10:1510.45<br />
10:4512:15<br />
12:3014:00<br />
14:0014:45<br />
14:4516.15<br />
16:1516.45<br />
<br />
Sunday,1July<strong>2012</strong><br />
RegistrationdeskinKrolKazimierzHotel(KKH)<br />
Welcomedrink(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
<br />
Monday,2July<strong>2012</strong><br />
Registrationdesk(KKH)<br />
OpeningCeremony(lecturehall<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
1 st session[S1.]:GeneralSession<br />
(allaspects<strong>of</strong>veterinarydiagnosis&drugresistanceissues)<br />
lecturehall<strong>of</strong>KKH(09:3018:15)<br />
[S1.]Keynotelecture:Theemergence<strong>of</strong>Schmallenbergvirus–Howtorespondto<br />
newepizooticsinEurope?WimVanderPoel,DVM,PhD,CentralVeterinary<br />
Institute,WageningenUniversityandResearchCentre,Department<strong>of</strong>Virology,P.O.Box65,8200<br />
ABLelystad,Edelhertweg15,8219PHLelystad,TheNetherlands<br />
C<strong>of</strong>feebreak+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
[S1.]Oralpresentations(6)<br />
1. Oralfluids–samplematrixforeffectiveherdhealthmonitoring.ChristinaBoss,Life<br />
Technologies,Germany.<br />
2. Diagnosticproperties<strong>of</strong>severalPRRSantibodyELISAsinthecontext<strong>of</strong>a<br />
longitudinalstudy<strong>of</strong>afarmusingdifferentvaccinationstrategies.KatrinStrutzberg<br />
Minder,IVDGmbH(IVDInnovativeVeterinaryDiagnostics),Germany.<br />
3. Introductionrate<strong>of</strong>alowpathogenicavianinfluenzavirusinfectionindifferent<br />
Dutchpoultrysectors.RuthBouwstra,CentralVeterinaryInstitute(CVILelystad),<br />
TheNetherlands.<br />
4. AduplexonesteprealtimeRTPCRfordiagnosis<strong>of</strong>footandmouthdisease.Kamila<br />
Górna,ANSES,France.<br />
5. Validation<strong>of</strong>acompetitiveELISAforthedetection<strong>of</strong>antibodiesantip26<strong>of</strong>equine<br />
infectiousanemiavirusinequinesera.RobertoNardini,IZSLAZIOETOSCANA,Italy.<br />
6. Diagnosticperformance<strong>of</strong>acommercialPRRSserumantibodyELISAadaptedtooral<br />
fluidspecimens:fieldsamples.AndreaBallagi,IDEXXLaboratories,Sweden.<br />
Lunch(restaurant<strong>of</strong>KKH)+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
[S1.]Keynotelecture:Assessingtheantimicrobialsusceptibility<strong>of</strong>bacteria<strong>of</strong><br />
animaloriginsomebasicconsiderations.Pr<strong>of</strong>.Dr.StefanSchwarz,Institutfür<br />
NutztiergenetikFriedrichLoefflerInstitut(FLI),Höltystr.10,D31535NeustadtMariensee,Germany<br />
[S1.]Oralpresentations(6)<br />
7. Subtyping<strong>of</strong>swineinfluenzavirusesbymultiplexrealtimePCR.KeesvanMaanen,<br />
GDAnimalHealthService,TheNetherlands.<br />
8. Importance<strong>of</strong>continuousvalidation<strong>of</strong>molecularmethodsforroutinediagnosis<strong>of</strong><br />
PRRSVRNAinclinicalsamples.SandraRevillaFernández,AustrianAgencyfor<br />
HealthandFoodSafety/InstituteforVeterinaryDiseaseControlMödling,Austria.<br />
9. Viraldiagnosisusingtransmissionelectronmicroscopy.WilliamCooley,AHVLA,<br />
UnitedKingdom.<br />
10. Abeadbasedmultipleximmun<strong>of</strong>luorometricassayforscreeningandconfirmation<strong>of</strong><br />
allmajorpriontypesinsheep.JanLangeveld,CentralVeterinayInstitute<strong>of</strong><br />
WageningenUR,TheNetherlands.<br />
11. Usingoralfluidfortheserologicalmonitorization<strong>of</strong>PRRSVcirculationinagroup<strong>of</strong><br />
infectedgilts.XavierRebordosaTrigueros,HIPRA,Spain.<br />
12. Enhanceddetection<strong>of</strong>bovinerespiratoryvirusesbyinclusion<strong>of</strong>cohortanimals.<br />
RonanO’Neill,DAFMLaboratories,CentralVeterinaryResearchLaboratory,Ireland<br />
C<strong>of</strong>feebreak+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)
16:4518.15<br />
20:0023:00<br />
[S1.]Oralpresentations(6)<br />
13. Thefirstyear<strong>of</strong>obligatoryBVDcontrolinGermany–diagnosticstrategies,results<br />
andexperiences.HorstSchirrmeier,FriedrichLoefflerInstitut,Institute<strong>of</strong><br />
DiagnosticVirology,Germany.<br />
14. EuropeanPRRSv–diagnosticsolutionsforarapidlymutatingvirus.ChristinaBoss,<br />
LifeTechnologies,Germany.<br />
15. Serologicalanalysisandmonitoring<strong>of</strong>IBR.IsitpossibletocontrolIBRgEantibodies<br />
inabulktankmilk?LourdesPorquetGaranto,HIPRA,Spain.<br />
16. Developmentandvalidation<strong>of</strong>arealtimePCRzengelmixforthediagnosisand<br />
quantification<strong>of</strong>CoxiellaBurnetii.AleidaVillaEspinosa,EXOPOL,SL.Autovacunasy<br />
Diagnóstico,Spain.<br />
17. Ringtestevaluationforthedetection<strong>of</strong>PRRSVantibodiesinoralfluidspecimens<br />
usingacommercialPRRSVserumantibodyELISA.AndreaBallagi,IDEXX<br />
Laboratories,Sweden.<br />
18. RealtimePCR,MycoplasmaGallisepticum,Mycoplasmasynoviae,Mycoplasma<br />
meleagridis.AndréFuchs,IDEXXLivestockandPoultryDiagnostics,U.S.A.<br />
Barbecuepartyinthegarden<strong>of</strong>theNationalVeterinaryResearchInstitutein<br />
Pulawy(transportbybusestoandfromKazimierzDolnywillbeprovidedbythe<br />
organizer–buseswillleavefromKKHat19:40)
Day3<br />
09:0009:45<br />
9:4510:45<br />
10:4511.15<br />
Tuesday,3July<strong>2012</strong><br />
2 nd session[S2.]:Diagnosticsatthepoint<strong>of</strong>interest<br />
(pensitetests,SNAPtestsandhomemadetestsusedbeyondthelabbencharea)<br />
lecturehall<strong>of</strong>KKH(09:0010:45)<br />
[S2.]Keynotelecture:Whendoyouwanttheresult?Howmuchdoyouwanttopay!<br />
AndrewSoldan,DVM,PhD,Head<strong>of</strong>AHVLAScientific,AHVLA–Weybridge,WoodhamLane,<br />
NewHaw,Addlestone,SurreyKT153NB,UnitedKingdom<br />
[S2.]Oralpresentations(4)<br />
1. Development<strong>of</strong>arapidisothermalassaytodetectTaylorellaequigenitalis,the<br />
causativeagent<strong>of</strong>contagiousequinemetritis.SarahNorth,AHVLAWeybridge,<br />
TechnologyTransferUnit,SpecialistScientificSupport,UnitedKingdom.<br />
2. Laboratoryvalidation<strong>of</strong>animmunochromatographictestfortherapiddetection<strong>of</strong>koi<br />
herpesvirus(cyhv3)ingillswabs.RobertVrancken,OkapiSciencesN.V.,Belgium.<br />
3. Evaluation<strong>of</strong>rapidHRSVstriptestsfordetection<strong>of</strong>bovinerespiratorysyncytialvirus.<br />
WojciechSocha,Department<strong>of</strong>Virology,NVRIPulawy,Poland.<br />
4. Evaluation<strong>of</strong>Alatexagglutinationtestfortheidentification<strong>of</strong>Clostridiumdifficile<strong>of</strong><br />
porcineorigin.LauraVallsVila,Hipra,DiagnosticCenter,Girona,Spain.<br />
C<strong>of</strong>feebreak+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
3 rd session[S3.]Emerging,reemergingandwildlifediseasesdiagnosticpossibilities<br />
(detectiontoolsbasedoncommercialandhomemadetests,theirperformanceandvalidationinthelab)<br />
lecturehall<strong>of</strong>KKH(11:1516:30)<br />
11:1512:00<br />
12:0013:00<br />
13:0014:30<br />
14:3016:15<br />
16:3018:00<br />
20:0022:00<br />
[S3.]Keynotelecture:Emergingandreemergingwildlifediseases:pathologyand<br />
relatedtechniquesfordiagnosticsandforgeneralandtargetedsurveillance.<br />
DoloresGavierWidén,DVM,MS,PhD,AssociatePr<strong>of</strong>.,Department<strong>of</strong>Pathologyand<br />
WildlifeDiseases,DeputyHead<strong>of</strong>Dept.,HeadR&DDivision,NationalVeterinaryInstitute(SVA),<br />
SE75189Uppsala,Sweden<br />
[S3.]Oralpresentations(4)<br />
1. SchmallenbergvirusoutbreakinTheNetherlands:Routinediagnosticsandtestresults.<br />
RuthBouwstra,CentralVeterinaryInstitute(CVILelystad),TheNetherlands.<br />
2. 25years<strong>of</strong>passivesurveillance<strong>of</strong>batsintheNetherlands.Molecularepidemiology<br />
andevolution<strong>of</strong>EBLV1.BartKooi,CentralVeterinaryInstitute<strong>of</strong>WageningenUR–<br />
Lelystad,TheNetherlands.<br />
3. Diagnosis<strong>of</strong>QfeverinDairyCattlebyPhasespecificMilkSerology.JensBöttcher,<br />
BavarianAnimalHealthService,Germany<br />
4. EQUINEnocardi<strong>of</strong>ormplacentitis&abortionoutbreakandfarmbasedriskfactor<br />
study,20102011.CraigN.Carter,University<strong>of</strong>Kentucky,U.S.A.<br />
Lunch(restaurant<strong>of</strong>KKH)+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
[S3.]Oralpresentations(7)<br />
5. AnewdiagnostictoolforbovinetuberculosisIDEXXM.bovisantibodytestkit.<br />
ChristophEgli,IDEXXLabs,Inc.,U.S.A.<br />
6. Detection<strong>of</strong>SchmallenbergvirusintheUK.AnnaLaRocca,AnimalHealthand<br />
VeterinaryLaboratories(AHVLA),UnitedKingdom.<br />
7. Detection<strong>of</strong>WNVenzooticcirculationinhorseswithneurologicalsignsandincaptive<br />
sentinelchickensintheprefecture<strong>of</strong>Thessaloniki,Greece.SerafeimC.Chaintoutis,<br />
Faculty<strong>of</strong>VeterinaryMedicine,AristotleUniversity<strong>of</strong>Thessaloniki,Greece.<br />
8. Schmallenbergvirus:serologicalstudiesinGermanholdings.HorstSchirrmeier,<br />
FriedrichLoefflerInstitut,Institute<strong>of</strong>DiagnosticVirology,Germany.<br />
9. Differentdiagnostictoolsforabroadrange<strong>of</strong>macavirusesandtheirreservoirand<br />
susceptiblehosts.ChristineFoerster.Institute<strong>of</strong>virology,Diagnosticlaboratory,<br />
Germany.<br />
10. Diagnosticaspects<strong>of</strong>Suidherpesvirus1infectioninwildboar.AdolfSteinrigl,AGES<br />
InstituteforVeterinaryDiseaseControl,Austria.<br />
11. Preliminaryvalidation<strong>of</strong>theIDScreen®SchmallenbergvirusIndirectELISA.Philippe<br />
Pourquier,IDVet,France.<br />
GeneralMeeting<strong>of</strong>EAVLD(EAVLDmembersonly)<br />
Galadinner(restaurant<strong>of</strong>KKH)
Day4<br />
Wednesday,4July<strong>2012</strong><br />
4 th session[S4.]Newtechniquesinbacteriology,parasitologyandpathology<br />
(newadvancesindiagnostictechniques)<br />
lecturehall<strong>of</strong>KKH(09:0011:15)<br />
09:0009:45 [S4.]Keynotelecture:MALDITOFandothernewdiagnostictechniques.Dr.Markus<br />
Kostrzewa,Director<strong>of</strong>MolecularBiology,R&D,BrukerDaltonikGmbH,Fahrenheitstr.4,D28359<br />
Bremen,Germany<br />
09:4511:15 [S4.]Oralpresentations(6)<br />
1. Suitability<strong>of</strong>recombinantproteinsforthediagnosis<strong>of</strong>leptospirosisinpigs.Ulrike<br />
Ripp,Synlab.vetLeipzig,Germany.<br />
2. BiologgenerationIII,matrixassistedlaserdesorption/ionisationtime<strong>of</strong>flight(MALDI<br />
TOF)massspectrometryand16srRNAgenesequencingfortheidentification<strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria<strong>of</strong>veterinaryinterest.PeterWragg,AnimalHealthandVeterinary<br />
LaboratoriesAgency(Weybridge),UnitedKingdom.<br />
3. Evaluation<strong>of</strong>thediagnosticperformance<strong>of</strong>peptidecocktailsintheinterferongamma<br />
assayfordiagnosis<strong>of</strong>tuberculosisincattle.AlexRaeber,PrionicsAG,Switzerland.<br />
4. Matrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtime<strong>of</strong>flightmassspectrometry(MALDI<br />
TOFMS)inaveterinarydiagnosticlaboratory.AnnetHeuvelink,GDAnimalHealth<br />
Service,TheNetherlands.<br />
5. Rapididentification<strong>of</strong>bovinemastitispathogensusingMALDITOF.GudrunOveresch,<br />
Institute<strong>of</strong>VeterinaryBacteriology,University<strong>of</strong>Bern,Switzerland.<br />
6. 15minuteELISAusingalowcostcommercialbiosensor.JasonSawyer,AnimalHealth<br />
andVeterinaryLaboratoriesAgency(Weybridge),UnitedKingdom.<br />
11:1511:45 Closingceremony,EAVLD2014<br />
11:4513:00 Lunch(restaurant<strong>of</strong>KKH)+postersession+sponsors’exhibitions(patio<strong>of</strong>KKH)<br />
13:00 End<strong>of</strong>theCongress<br />
(shuttlebusestoWarsawAirport)
GD Animal Health Service<br />
Custom made<br />
animal health solutions<br />
GD Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing schemes<br />
R&D<br />
Veterinary laboratory<br />
GD Diagnostics<br />
Consultancy<br />
www.gddeventer.com
Oral presentations<br />
“General Session”<br />
(1 st session)
S1 - K - 01<br />
THE EMERGENCE OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS – HOW TO RESPOND TO NEW EPIZOOTICS IN<br />
EUROPE<br />
Wim H. M. van der Poel<br />
Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre, Lelystad, The Netherlands, Tel. +31320238383, email:<br />
wim.vanderpoel@wur.nl<br />
Schmallenberg virus, epizootic, sheep, cattle, goat<br />
The emergence <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus<br />
Schmallenberg virus was discovered in November 2011,<br />
and named after the village in Germany where it was<br />
first detected in blood samples from a dairy herd (1).<br />
The provisionally named “Schmallenberg virus” is an<br />
enveloped, negative-sense, segmented, single-stranded<br />
RNA virus. It belongs to the Bunyaviridae family, within<br />
the Orthobunyavirus genus. Schmallenberg virus is<br />
related to the Simbu serogroup viruses, which also<br />
includes ruminant viruses like Shamonda, Akabane,<br />
Sathuperi, Douglas and Aino virus. Based on what is<br />
already known about the genetically related Simbu<br />
serogroup viruses, Schmallenberg virus affects domestic<br />
ruminants. At its first occurrence in dairy cattle in both<br />
Germany and The Netherlands Schmallenberg virus<br />
infections presented with fever and reduced milk yield, in<br />
the Netherlands also severe diarrhoea (2). In early<br />
December 2011, congenital malformations were reported<br />
in new-born lambs in the Netherlands, and<br />
Schmallenberg virus was detected in and isolated from<br />
the brain tissue. Thereafter the virus was also detected<br />
in malformed calves and goat kids. Gross pathology in<br />
malformed animals and stillbirths (calves, lambs, kids)<br />
included arthrogryposis, hydrocephaly, brachygnathia<br />
inferior, ankylosis, torticollis, scoliosis, hydranencephaly,<br />
hypoplasia <strong>of</strong> the central nervous system, porencephaly<br />
and subcutaneous oedema (3). The symptoms can be<br />
summarised as arthrogryposis and hydranencephaly<br />
syndrome (AHS). The spatial and temporal distribution<br />
suggests that the disease is first transmitted by insect<br />
vectors, in particular culicoides spp and then vertically in<br />
utero. The detection <strong>of</strong> SBV in midges (culicoides spp) in<br />
several countries supports this assumption.<br />
The emergence <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus in Europe<br />
resulted in a rapid increase <strong>of</strong> malformations in new<br />
borne lambs and later on calves. In spring <strong>2012</strong> the<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> cases started to decrease, first in sheep and<br />
then in cattle. By May <strong>2012</strong> Schmallenberg virus had<br />
affected farms in at least 8 countries in Western Europe,<br />
and although the epidemic curve seemed to come to an<br />
end by May <strong>2012</strong> a further spread over Europe still is<br />
likely (4). Schmallenberg virus clearly causes severe<br />
disease in ruminants and as a result economic losses<br />
which may be enhanced by trade restrictions. As the<br />
family <strong>of</strong> Bunyaviridae contains several important<br />
zoonoses, studies were performed to elucidate its<br />
zoonotic potential. In a rapid risk assessment in Dec<br />
2011 it was concluded that human infections were<br />
unlikely but could not be excluded. Therefore both in the<br />
Netherlands and Germany serosurveys in the human<br />
population were performed. In the Netherlands 301<br />
persons exposed to SBV, farmers and veterinarians,<br />
were tested and in North Rhine-Westphalia 60 cattle and<br />
sheep farmers were tested. None <strong>of</strong> the tested<br />
individuals showed antibody to SBV and it was concluded<br />
that there is no evidence for zoonotic infection (5).<br />
How to respond to new epizootics in Europe<br />
The “Schmallenberg virus experience” again has shown<br />
that the introduction <strong>of</strong> a completely new virus on the<br />
continent can encompass an important threat to animal<br />
health and public health. Moreover, continued changes in<br />
human and animal demography, coupled with<br />
environmental changes and changes within a virus itself<br />
make it likely that the trend for increased viral disease<br />
emergence will continue.<br />
Strategies to improve veterinary and public health<br />
protection with regard to emerging pathogens have<br />
focused towards improved surveillance. Improved<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> viruses in reservoirs, early disease outbreak<br />
detection, or broadly based research to clarify important<br />
factors that favour (re-)emergence. In order to recognize<br />
and combat viral diseases, it is pivotal to understand the<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> these infections. We need to know the<br />
pathogen, its vertebrate hosts and the methods <strong>of</strong><br />
transmission between these hosts. This should be<br />
coupled with knowledge <strong>of</strong> spatio-temporal disease<br />
patterns together with changes over time. Together,<br />
these can be used to build a picture <strong>of</strong> the dynamic<br />
processes involved in virus transmission that can be<br />
used to account for observed disease patterns and<br />
ultimately to forecast spread and establishment into new<br />
areas.<br />
Longitudinal veterinary surveillance should include food<br />
producing animals as well as wildlife and also insect<br />
vectors should be considered. A main goal <strong>of</strong> infectious<br />
disease surveillance is the early detection <strong>of</strong> new<br />
emerging pathogens. For this we will primarily be<br />
dependant <strong>of</strong> clinicians and laboratories testing field<br />
samples from potential reservoirs. Case reports will have<br />
to be generated and combined to early detect new<br />
emerging pathogens. Electronic systems, preferably<br />
web-based, could be very helpful to achieve this. In<br />
addition, improved detection may also be achieved<br />
through use <strong>of</strong> syndromic approaches. Syndromic<br />
surveillance, which collects non-specific syndromes<br />
before diagnosis, has great advantages in promoting the<br />
early detection <strong>of</strong> new emerging diseases before disease<br />
confirmation. By combining syndromic surveillance with<br />
case report surveillance in online reporting systems, a<br />
sensitive early detection system for new emerging<br />
diseases could be build.<br />
Novel molecular methods, for example DNA microarrays<br />
and whole genome approaches <strong>of</strong>fer unprecedented<br />
opportunities for rapid detection but these require<br />
significant optimisation and validation before they can be<br />
deployed broadly. Also due to costs limitations, the rapid<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> a new virus will only be feasible by<br />
employing the different molecular techniques, including<br />
microarray, (RT)-PCR and whole genome sequencing, in<br />
a sensible combination. By applying molecular<br />
approaches, positive detections <strong>of</strong> a lot <strong>of</strong> different<br />
pathogens in a lot <strong>of</strong> different samples have been<br />
performed. However, it is much more difficult to pro<strong>of</strong><br />
causation. The agent should be present at high<br />
concentrations and seroconversion should be<br />
demonstrated. Confidence in a causal relationship<br />
between a candidate pathogen and a disease is<br />
enhanced by fulfilment <strong>of</strong> Kochs’ Postulates (i.e.<br />
demonstration <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> an agent in all cases <strong>of</strong><br />
a disease and not in the absence <strong>of</strong> disease, replication<br />
<strong>of</strong> disease following ex vivo cultivation and introduction<br />
into a naïve host); however, this will not always be<br />
feasible. Apart from the fact that this can be extremely<br />
time-consuming, some viruses cannot be cultured and<br />
experimental infection can be extremely difficult.<br />
Prompt detection and instigation <strong>of</strong> control measures<br />
such as vaccination are crucial to prevent spread. Cloned
antigens or attenuated vaccines can be modified into the<br />
appropriate antigenic forms and in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
arboviruses, approaches targeting replication in the<br />
arthropod vector, or the vectors themselves, may <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
substantial benefit for control. However, the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a safe and efficacious vaccine including<br />
its registration for use is very time-consuming. Moreover<br />
history has learned that it is extremely difficult to swiftly<br />
design a new reactive vaccination strategy, which means<br />
that in the first phase <strong>of</strong> every new epidemic we will<br />
have to rely on biocontainment and biosecurity<br />
measurements.<br />
National and International cooperation can be helpful to<br />
early identify new pathogens and will be needed to<br />
develop innovative and rapid control strategies to<br />
combat emerging diseases. Therefore this should be<br />
stimulated as much as possible. Knowledge exchange<br />
and research networking should become a commonplace.<br />
In addition the One Health approach, involving inclusive<br />
collaborations between physicians, veterinarians and<br />
other health and environmental pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, will be<br />
more and more important to combat emerging viral<br />
disease outbreaks. National authorities as well as<br />
international organisations like WHO, OIE, FAO and also<br />
ECDC therefore should actively support such cooperative<br />
initiatives to achieve an optimal response to new<br />
epizootics in Europe.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M,<br />
Schirrmeier H, Eschbaumer M, Goller KV, Wernike K, Fischer M,<br />
Breithaupt A, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M (<strong>2012</strong>) Novel<br />
orthobunyavirus in Cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 18:<br />
469-472.<br />
2. Muskens J, Smolenaars AJ, van der Poel WH, Mars MH, van<br />
Wuijckhuise L, Holzhauer M, van Weering H, Kock P (<strong>2012</strong>)<br />
Diarrhea and loss <strong>of</strong> production on Dutch dairy farms caused by<br />
the Schmallenberg virus. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 137:112-115.<br />
3. Van den Brom R, Luttikholt SJ, Lievaart-Peterson K,<br />
Peperkamp NH, Mars MH, van der Poel WH, Vellema P (<strong>2012</strong>)<br />
Epizootic <strong>of</strong> ovine congenital malformations associated with<br />
Schmallenberg virus infection. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 137:106-<br />
111.<br />
4. Armin R.W. Elbers , Willie L.A. Loeffen, Sjaak Quak, Els de<br />
Boer-Luijtze, Arco N. van der Spek, Ruth Bouwstra, Riks Maas,<br />
Marcel A.H. Spierenburg, Eric P. de Kluijver, Gerdien van Schaik,<br />
Wim H.M. van der Poel (<strong>2012</strong>) Seroprevalence <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg<br />
Virus Antibodies among Dairy Cattle, the Netherlands, Winter<br />
2011–<strong>2012</strong>. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18:..<br />
5 .Chantal Reusken, Cees van den Wijngaard, Paul van Beek,<br />
Martin Beer, Gert-Jan Godeke, Leslie Isken, Hans van den<br />
Kerkh<strong>of</strong>, Wilfrid van Pelt , Wim van der Poel, Johan Reimerink,<br />
Peter Schielen, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, Piet Vellema, Ankje de<br />
Vries, Inge Wouters and Marion Koopmans (<strong>2012</strong>) Public health<br />
response to an emerging arbovirus: the case <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg<br />
virus (submitted for publication).
S1 - K - 02<br />
ASSESSING THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BACTERIA OBTAINED FROM ANIMALS<br />
Stefan Schwarz 1 , Peter Silley 2,3 , Shabbir Simjee 4 , Neil Woodford 5 , Engeline van Duijkeren 6 , Alan P. Johnson 7<br />
and Wim Gaastra 8<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany<br />
2<br />
MB Consult Limited, Lymington, UK<br />
3<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Biomedical Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Bradford, Bradford, UK<br />
4 Elanco Animal Health, Basingstoke, UK<br />
5 Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring and Reference Laboratory, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London, UK<br />
6<br />
Centre for Infectious Disease Control Netherlands (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands<br />
7 Department <strong>of</strong> Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London, UK<br />
8<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, interpretive criteria, MIC 50 , MIC 90 , multi-resistance<br />
Introduction<br />
In recent years, antimicrobial resistance in bacteria <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
origin, including food-producing animals, pet and companion<br />
animals, fish and other aquatic animals as well as wild animals,<br />
has gained particular attention. Consequently, an increasing<br />
number <strong>of</strong> studies that include antimicrobial susceptibility testing<br />
have been published. However, an analysis <strong>of</strong> recently published<br />
articles revealed a number <strong>of</strong> frequently occurring shortcomings,<br />
which may have an impact either directly on the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
results obtained or on the conclusions drawn. An editorial has<br />
been published simultaneously in Veterinary Microbiology (1) and<br />
in the Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2) and is intended<br />
to highlight the major pitfalls and provide guidance for authors,<br />
and reviewers on the correct performance <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility testing as well as the presentation <strong>of</strong> the obtained<br />
results and the proper comparison <strong>of</strong> data from different studies.<br />
Methodology<br />
Several methods, like disc diffusion, E-test, agar dilution, broth<br />
microdilution and broth macrodilution are suitable for in-vitro<br />
antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Whichever method is<br />
used, the tests have to be performed in accordance with an<br />
internationally accepted procedure, such as those published by<br />
the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) among<br />
others. The documents issued are regularly updated and, since<br />
the methodologies and interpretative criteria change over time, it<br />
is important to always follow the latest edition. In contrast to most<br />
other organizations, the CLSI is unique in that it produces<br />
separate documents for use in human and veterinary<br />
microbiology. The CLSI documents are not freely available, but<br />
must be purchased.<br />
The status <strong>of</strong> the various types <strong>of</strong> documents is clarified below.<br />
The CLSI for example differentiates between “standards” and<br />
“guidelines”. A “standard” is a document that clearly identifies<br />
specific and essential requirements for materials, methods, and<br />
practices to be used in an unmodified form. A standard may, in<br />
addition, contain discretionary elements, which are clearly<br />
identified. In contrast, a “guideline” is a document describing<br />
criteria for a general operating practice, procedure, or material for<br />
voluntary use. A guideline can be used as written or modified by<br />
the user to fit specific needs.<br />
The current CLSI document for testing antimicrobial<br />
susceptibilities <strong>of</strong> bacteria isolated from animals, M31-A3 (3), is<br />
an approved standard and cannot be used in a modified form.<br />
Clear and precise instructions on how to perform AST in vitro are<br />
given. They include, for example, the medium to be used<br />
(including any supplements required to support the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
specific bacteria), the inoculum density, the incubation time, the<br />
temperature and test conditions. These instructions are not<br />
optional, but are strict rules that must be adhered to for good<br />
laboratory practice. Thus, statements such as “Susceptibility<br />
testing mainly followed the recommendations given in the CLSI<br />
document M31-A3” are not acceptable. Any deviation from the<br />
approved test conditions, such as the use <strong>of</strong> a different medium<br />
or extended incubation times for slow-growing bacteria, have to<br />
be specified and justified by the authors.<br />
Most AST documents cover testing <strong>of</strong> numerous different<br />
bacterial species. However, for several bacterial pathogens<br />
relevant to the veterinary field, such as Haemophilus parasuis or<br />
Riemerella anatipestifer, no approved methodology exists. If<br />
authors adopt a method approved for a phylogenetically closelyrelated<br />
organism, it must be stated clearly that the method used<br />
has not been approved for the species tested, but for another<br />
member the same genus (e.g. if the method for testing<br />
Haemophilus influenzae is used to test H. parasuis). Whenever<br />
susceptibility testing is undertaken on bacteria for which there is<br />
no approved standard available, the methodology chosen has to<br />
be validated first, as detailed in CLSI document M37-A3 (4).<br />
Quality controls<br />
It is essential to test approved AST reference strains in parallel<br />
with the test strains for quality control (QC) purposes. Lists <strong>of</strong><br />
approved reference strains are included in the documents<br />
mentioned. They also contain acceptable MIC and zone diameter<br />
ranges for these reference strains and clearly state the<br />
methodology (e.g. broth microdilution) and the medium (e.g.<br />
Mueller-Hinton agar) that the values relate to. The reference<br />
strains must be relevant to the bacterial species tested, e.g.<br />
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 may be used when testing<br />
Enterobacteriaceae. Furthermore, authors must ensure (a) that<br />
reference strains are suitable for quality control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
antimicrobial agents tested, (b) that the range <strong>of</strong> concentrations<br />
(in broth microdilution) tested spans the entire approved QC<br />
ranges, and (c) that discs (in disc diffusion tests) contain the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial for which the QC ranges are approved.<br />
Interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results<br />
AST studies seek to categorize bacterial isolates as susceptible,<br />
intermediate or resistant to each antimicrobial tested, on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the MICs or the zone diameters obtained. Such<br />
classification requires approved interpretive criteria. Currently,<br />
two different types <strong>of</strong> interpretive criteria are available, clinical<br />
breakpoints and epidemiological cut-<strong>of</strong>f values (5,6). The precise<br />
emphasis <strong>of</strong> a particular study will dictate which criteria must be<br />
applied. If data are intended to guide a therapeutic approach (i.e.<br />
the aim <strong>of</strong> the study is to determine which antimicrobial agents<br />
are most likely to lead to therapeutic success), clinical<br />
breakpoints must be applied. Epidemiological cut-<strong>of</strong>f values<br />
should be used to describe MIC distributions <strong>of</strong> bacteria without<br />
clinical context. Clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
values may be very similar or even identical for some<br />
bacteria/drug combinations; however, authors need to<br />
understand that epidemiological cut-<strong>of</strong>f values are determined by<br />
a different approach than clinical breakpoints and do not<br />
necessarily take into account the results <strong>of</strong> clinical efficacy<br />
studies, dosing and route <strong>of</strong> administration <strong>of</strong> the antimicrobial<br />
agents, nor the drug’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic<br />
parameters in the respective animal species. The term<br />
“breakpoint” should be used exclusively for clinical breakpoints<br />
and “susceptible”, “intermediate” and “resistant” categories<br />
should also be reserved for classifications made in relation to the<br />
therapeutic application <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial agents. When reporting<br />
data using epidemiological cut-<strong>of</strong>f values, the term ‘resistant’ is<br />
inappropriate, rather bacteria should be reported as ‘wild type’ if<br />
the MIC or zone diameter falls within the wild type range, or ‘nonwild<br />
type’ if the MIC is higher or the zone diameter smaller than<br />
the wild-type range.<br />
The CLSI document M31-A3 (3) lists exclusively clinical<br />
breakpoints and includes the largest collection <strong>of</strong> approved<br />
clinical breakpoints for bacteria <strong>of</strong> animal origin currently<br />
available, a considerable number <strong>of</strong> which represent veterinaryspecific<br />
breakpoints. Many <strong>of</strong> the latter have been approved for<br />
specific disease conditions <strong>of</strong>ten caused by particular bacterial<br />
species in defined animal host species. For example, approved<br />
clinical breakpoints for enr<strong>of</strong>loxacin in cattle apply exclusively for<br />
bovine respiratory diseases due to Pasteurella multocida,<br />
Mannheimia haemolytica and Histophilus somni. The use <strong>of</strong><br />
these breakpoints for other bovine bacteria and different disease
conditions, e.g. Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis, is<br />
unacceptable. Thus, the scope <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the veterinaryspecific<br />
breakpoints is clearly defined and cannot be altered.<br />
All standards for performance <strong>of</strong> AST contain interpretive<br />
criteria which refer specifically to that particular methodology.<br />
Thus a certain methodology and its associated interpretive<br />
criteria are an entity, and as such belong together. It is not good<br />
practice to ‘mix and match’ testing methodologies and interpretive<br />
criteria issued by different organizations. Authors who perform E-<br />
tests must refer to the interpretive criteria given by the<br />
manufacturer <strong>of</strong> the E-test strips. Since these interpretive criteria<br />
are not veterinary-specific, but are adopted from human<br />
medicine, their true value for veterinary pathogens is unkown.<br />
The same holds for CLSI-approved breakpoints adopted from<br />
human medicine and listed in CLSI document M31-A3 (3).<br />
Authors who describe AST <strong>of</strong> animal isolates, <strong>of</strong>ten use incorrect<br />
or out-dated interpretive criteria derived from their own or others’<br />
previous publications. This is also bad practice and <strong>of</strong>ten results<br />
in cumulative errors. Authors must ensure that correct (at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> submission) interpretive criteria are used. In addition,<br />
there is an onus on reviewers to verify whether the correct<br />
interpretive criteria were used.<br />
When comparing rates (percentages) <strong>of</strong> resistance between<br />
published studies, authors must make sure that the same<br />
methodologies and the same interpretive criteria have been used.<br />
Interpretive criteria <strong>of</strong>ten change over time and lowering the<br />
breakpoint(s) for a specific antimicrobial agent will result in a<br />
higher percentage <strong>of</strong> isolates being classified as resistant even if<br />
the MIC/zone size distribution <strong>of</strong> the population has not changed.<br />
As a consequence, an artefactual increase in the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
resistant strains may be noted (Fig. 1). Publication <strong>of</strong> the full MIC<br />
distributions for each species/drug combination reduces the<br />
potential for this error since the data can be re-analysed by<br />
others if interpretive criteria change.<br />
(a)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Salmonella isolates<br />
(b)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> Salmonella isolates<br />
2500<br />
2006<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
2500<br />
2011<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
susceptible: 2 mg/L<br />
susceptible: 0.06 mg/L<br />
MARAN 2004 (n = 2195)<br />
MARAN 2005 (n = 2238)<br />
resistant: 0.12 mg/L<br />
56 94 60 13 2 2<br />
0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16<br />
MIC values <strong>of</strong> cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin in mg/L<br />
resistant: 4 mg/L<br />
63 79 33 8 5 1<br />
0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16<br />
MIC values <strong>of</strong> cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin in mg/L<br />
0.27 %<br />
10.14 %<br />
Figure 1: Distribution <strong>of</strong> cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin MIC values among<br />
Salmonella isolates collected in the MARAN studies 2004 and<br />
2005 and distinctly different percentages <strong>of</strong> resistance resulting<br />
from the use <strong>of</strong> different interpretive criteria in 2004 (a) and in<br />
2005 (b)<br />
Such tables or histograms are <strong>of</strong>ten large and due to limitations<br />
on journal space, may need to be provided as supplemental<br />
material.<br />
Before performing disc diffusion, authors need to make sure that<br />
the discs contain the correct quantity <strong>of</strong> antibiotic for which<br />
interpretive criteria are available. Unfortunately, for many<br />
antimicrobial agents a range <strong>of</strong> discs with varying amounts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
antimicrobial agent are commercially available. However, zone<br />
diameter interpretive criteria are commonly available only for a<br />
single specific disc strength. For example, discs charged with 10<br />
µg, 15 µg or 30 µg erythromycin are available, but CLSI<br />
interpretive criteria and QC ranges for reference strains (3) refer<br />
only to zone diameters around a 15 µg disc. Since it is not<br />
possible to adjust the values measured with a 10 µg or a 30 µg<br />
disc to the values for an approved 15 µg disc, zone sizes<br />
obtained with the 10 µg or a 30 µg disc can neither be interpreted<br />
nor validated.<br />
A standard dilution series for AST consists <strong>of</strong> doubling antibiotic<br />
concentrations and includes the reference concentration 1 mg/L<br />
(e.g. 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 mg/L etc.). E-test strips indicate<br />
half-log values and so MICs determined by E-test should be<br />
‘rounded up’ to the next highest value on the standard series. For<br />
example, if an E-test indicates that growth is inhibited at 0.38<br />
mg/L (which is not a concentration in the standard series), the<br />
MIC should be rounded up and reported as 0.5 mg/L.<br />
MIC 50 and MIC 90 values<br />
MIC 50 and MIC 90 values as well as the range <strong>of</strong> values obtained<br />
are important parameters for reporting results <strong>of</strong> susceptibility<br />
testing when multiple isolates <strong>of</strong> a given species are tested. The<br />
MIC 50 represents the MIC value at which at least 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
isolates in a test population are inhibited; it is equivalent to the<br />
median MIC value. Given n test strains and the values y 1 , y 2 , ...,<br />
y n representing a graded series <strong>of</strong> MICs starting with the lowest<br />
value, the MIC 50 is the value at position n x 0.5 as long as n is an<br />
even number <strong>of</strong> test strains. If n is an odd number <strong>of</strong> test strains,<br />
the value at position (n+1) x 0.5 represents the MIC 50 value. The<br />
MIC 90 represents the MIC value at which at least 90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
strains within a test population are inhibited; the 90 th percentile.<br />
The MIC 90 is calculated accordingly, using n x 0.9. If the resulting<br />
number is an integer, this number represents the MIC 90 ; if the<br />
resulting number is not an integer, the next integer following the<br />
respective value represents the MIC 90 . MIC 50 and MIC 90 values<br />
should always be presented as concentrations on the standard<br />
AST dilution series. If using a statistical package to calculate the<br />
values, never use intermediate values. It should be noted that<br />
MIC 50 and MIC 90 values are not necessarily suitable parameters<br />
to describe bimodal or trimodal MIC distributions, although a<br />
discrepancy <strong>of</strong> several dilution steps between the MIC 50 and<br />
MIC 90 values, e.g. MIC 50 at 0.25 mg/L and the MIC 90 at 16 mg/L,<br />
might point towards the presence <strong>of</strong> at least two subpopulations<br />
which differ distinctly in their MICs to a given antimicrobial agent.<br />
As an example, in a test population <strong>of</strong> 70 strains, the MIC 50 is the<br />
value at position 35 and the MIC 90 the one at position 63 in a<br />
graded series <strong>of</strong> MICs starting with the lowest MIC value at<br />
position 1. In a test population <strong>of</strong> 71 strains, the MIC 50 is the<br />
value at position 36 and the MIC 90 the one at position 64 in the<br />
aforementioned graded series <strong>of</strong> the MICs.<br />
Although MIC 50 and MIC 90 values can also be calculated for<br />
small test populations <strong>of</strong> e.g. 10–30 strains, under such<br />
conditions few strains with high MICs will have a<br />
disproportionately high influence on the MIC 50 and MIC 90 values.<br />
Thus, researchers are encouraged not to overemphasize MIC 50<br />
and MIC 90 data obtained from small test populations. Since the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> MIC 50 and MIC 90 increases with the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
strains tested, sufficiently large test populations should be used<br />
for most meaningful statements on MIC 50 and MIC 90 values.<br />
Multi-resistance<br />
The term ‘multi-resistance’ exclusively refers to acquired<br />
resistance properties. Bacteria may occasionally exhibit intrinsic<br />
(primary) resistance to certain antimicrobial agents. Intrinsic<br />
resistance may be based on either the lack or the inaccessibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the antimicrobial target site among the bacteria in question. In<br />
other cases, intrinsically resistant bacteria produce inactivating<br />
enzymes, such as species-specific β-lactamases, contain<br />
multidrug transporters, and/or exhibit permeability barriers. Such<br />
intrinsic resistances must be excluded when describing multiresistance<br />
patterns.<br />
There is no universally accepted definition <strong>of</strong> ‘multi-resistance’.<br />
As a consequence, this term is used inconsistently in the<br />
literature. The following suggestions are intended to provide<br />
guidance for the most accurate presentation <strong>of</strong> multi-resistance<br />
patterns:
(a) If only phenotypic susceptibility testing is performed,<br />
resistance to three or more classes <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial agents can<br />
be referred to as multi-resistance. For example, resistance to<br />
enr<strong>of</strong>loxacin, marb<strong>of</strong>loxacin, difloxacin and orbifloxacin<br />
represents resistance to one antimicrobial class, since all agents<br />
are fluoroquinolones and resistance is most likely mediated by<br />
the same mechanism(s). In the case <strong>of</strong> fluoroquinolones (and<br />
some other antimicrobial classes), resistance to a single<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> this class <strong>of</strong> antibiotic agent can reasonably be<br />
extrapolated to resistance (or reduced susceptibility) to other<br />
members <strong>of</strong> that class. However, single class representatives<br />
cannot always be validly defined, e.g. for -lactams and<br />
aminoglycosides. In these cases, resistance is not a class effect<br />
and multiple, diverse resistance mechanisms exist, each <strong>of</strong> which<br />
confers resistance to sub-groups <strong>of</strong> the respective antimicrobial<br />
class. Resistance to sub-groups should be counted separately<br />
e.g. resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin is distinct from<br />
resistance to gentamicin, kanamycin and/or tobramycin.<br />
(b) If phenotypic susceptibility testing is supplemented with<br />
molecular analysis for the resistance genes present, multiresistance<br />
should be assessed at the molecular level. Bacterial<br />
isolates exhibiting the presence <strong>of</strong> three or more resistance<br />
genes or mutations, all <strong>of</strong> which are associated with a different<br />
resistance phenotype (i.e. affecting different antimicrobial classes<br />
or sub-groups), may be referred to as multi-resistant. Exceptions<br />
to this rule would include those cases where a single resistance<br />
gene or a gene complex is associated with resistance to<br />
structurally and/or functionally different antimicrobial agents, e.g.<br />
the gene cfr for resistance to phenicols, lincosamides,<br />
oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A antibiotics or<br />
the erm genes for combined resistance to macrolides,<br />
lincosamides and streptogramin B antibiotics.<br />
Bacteria <strong>of</strong> Animal Origin; A Report. (ISBN Number:1-56238-765-0). CLSI<br />
document X08-R. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.<br />
Conclusions<br />
As indicated above, conducting AST and subsequent data<br />
interpretation is a complex matter. A number <strong>of</strong> competent<br />
authorities provide instructions for performing AST and data<br />
interpretation. Each should be followed precisely. Importantly,<br />
protocols for AST and data interpretation from different<br />
authorities cannot be interchanged. AST data intended for the<br />
recommendation <strong>of</strong> therapy should be interpreted and reported<br />
using clinical breakpoints, whereas AST data intended for<br />
surveillance purposes may be reported using epidemiological cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
values. Moreover, the comparison <strong>of</strong> data generated in<br />
different studies requires not only a common methodology, but<br />
also the preferential presentation <strong>of</strong> the data as MIC distribution<br />
which allows for fast and easy re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> the original data<br />
even if the interpretive criteria change over time. In addition to the<br />
two editorials published in 2010 (1,2), CLSI has published in<br />
2011 a comprehensive report (CLSI document X08-R)<br />
“Generation, Presentation and Application <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial<br />
Susceptibility Test Data for Bacteria <strong>of</strong> Animal Origin” (7). This<br />
report provides additional information on how to avoid mistakes in<br />
AST methodology, AST data reporting and AST data<br />
interpretation.<br />
References<br />
1. Schwarz, S, Silley, P, Simjee, S, Woodford, N, van Duijkeren, E,<br />
Johnson, AP, Gaastra, W (2010). Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria obtained from animals. Veterinary Microbiology, 141, 1-4.<br />
2. Schwarz, S, Silley, P, Simjee, S, Woodford, N, van Duijkeren, E,<br />
Johnson, AP, Gaastra, W (2010). Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria obtained from animals. Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,<br />
65, 601-604.<br />
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2008a. Performance<br />
standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria<br />
isolated from animals; approved standard – third edition (ISBN Number:1-<br />
56238-659-X). CLSI document M31-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards<br />
Institute, Wayne, PA, USA.<br />
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2008b. Development<br />
<strong>of</strong> in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters for<br />
veterinary antimicrobial agents; approved guideline - third edition (ISBN<br />
Number 1-56238-660-3). CLSI document M 37-A3. Clinical and Laboratory<br />
Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA.<br />
5. Bywater, R, Silley, P, Simjee, S (2006). Antimicrobial breakpoints –<br />
definitions and conflicting requirements. Veterinary Microbiology 118, 158-<br />
159.<br />
6. Simjee, S, Silley, P, Werling, HO, Bywater, R (2008). Potential confusion<br />
regarding the term ‘resistance’. Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 61,<br />
228-229.<br />
7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2011). – Generation,<br />
Presentation and Application <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data for
S1 - O - 1<br />
ORAL FLUIDS – SAMPLE MATRIX FOR EFFECTIVE HERD HEALTH MONITORING<br />
C.Boss 1 , R. Shah 2 , C. O’Connell 2<br />
1<br />
Life Technologies,Darmstadt, Germany<br />
2<br />
Life Technologies, Austin, USA<br />
Oral Fluids, PRRS, PCV2, SIV<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> oral fluid as a sample matrix in porcine reproductive<br />
and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) surveillance has<br />
increased in many parts <strong>of</strong> the world over the last few years.<br />
Advantages <strong>of</strong> using this matrix are ease <strong>of</strong> collection, reduced<br />
stress to the pigs, the low cost <strong>of</strong> collection and minimum labor<br />
required. Successful implementation <strong>of</strong> sample testing through<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> this sample matrix has extended to the evaluation <strong>of</strong> its<br />
testing for other swine diseases, including porcine circovirus type<br />
2 (PCV2), swine influenza virus (SIV), and mycoplasma<br />
hyopneumoniae (M. Hyo).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
In a multi-center, collaborative study, cotton ropes were used to<br />
collect samples <strong>of</strong> oral fluid from pigs that were experimentally<br />
infected with PRRSV and PCV2. Additionally, oral fluid samples<br />
from SIV negative pens were spiked with SIV for evaluation.<br />
Nucleic acid was extracted from oral fluid samples using a<br />
MagMAX based magnetic bead extraction and then amplified<br />
using a TaqMan® based real-time PCR assay for each virus. The<br />
method is semi automated, involving the use <strong>of</strong> the MagMAX<br />
Express-96 Magnetic Particle Processor for the purification <strong>of</strong><br />
nucleic acid.<br />
For PRRSV testing, in collaboration with Kansas State University,<br />
oral fluids were collected from pens on the day that the pigs were<br />
experimentally infected through 40 days post-infection. Serum<br />
was collected from each pig within the pen on the same day that<br />
oral fluids were collected from the pen. Serum samples and oral<br />
fluids were both tested using real-time PCR.<br />
For PCV2 testing, in collaboration with Iowa State University,<br />
twenty-four 21-day-old pigs free <strong>of</strong> PRRSV and SIV were<br />
assigned to 1 <strong>of</strong> 4 groups and housed in pens in separate rooms.<br />
Pen number One was the control (None-Challenge) group. Each<br />
pig in the other 3 groups received PCV2a strain at 11 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
age (dpi 0). Six pigs (Pen 3) were re-challenged with PCV2a<br />
strain at 35, 70, and 105 dpi. Each pig in Pen 4 group<br />
alternatively received PCV2a (dpi 0 and 70) and PCV2b (dpi 35<br />
and 105). The two PCV2a strains used were heterologous. Oral<br />
fluids samples were collected, dpi 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and<br />
weekly thereafter until dpi 140. The results are shown in Figure 2<br />
for the time periods tested using the PCV2 real-time PCR<br />
reagents (dpi 2-98<br />
For SIV testing, in collaboration with Iowa State University, a total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 180 oral fluid samples were spiked with high, medium and low<br />
copy numbers <strong>of</strong> SIV. The extracted nucleic acids were also<br />
tested with subtyping reagents for the identification <strong>of</strong><br />
hemagglutinin and neuraminidase subtypes.<br />
<strong>of</strong> ~20 swine, the proposed method <strong>of</strong> sample preparation and<br />
nucleic acid purification efficiently processes multiple samples,<br />
thereby decreasing screening time.<br />
A major advantage <strong>of</strong> this high throughput method, combined<br />
with the ease <strong>of</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> oral fluid, is that large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
pigs can be tested without increased cost or labor. This provides<br />
a more efficient and cost effective testing environment and the<br />
ability to better curb incidences <strong>of</strong> infection.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Dr. Bob Rowland, Kansas State University<br />
Dr. Tanja Opriessnig, Iowa State University<br />
Dr. Christa Irwin, Iowa State University<br />
Dr. Jeff Zimmerman, Iowa State University<br />
Results<br />
PRRSV nucleic acid was amplified from all oral fluid samples<br />
derived from the experimentally infected pigs. Lower Cts,<br />
indicating a higher copy number <strong>of</strong> viral RNA, were present in the<br />
serum samples early post-infection; but similar levels were<br />
detected in serum and oral fluid at later collection points. These<br />
results indicate a high level <strong>of</strong> correlation between PRRSV<br />
detection from serum collected from individual animals and from<br />
the pen or herd based oral fluid samples.<br />
Using the SIV screening real-time PCR reagents, SIV nucleic<br />
acid was detectable in all <strong>of</strong> the spiked oral fluid samples and at<br />
each concentration level. Additionally, the results <strong>of</strong> the subtyping<br />
study indicate that all positive samples could be sub-typed.<br />
High titers <strong>of</strong> PCV2 were detected from day 12 through 28 post<br />
infection, and virus was detectable throughout the entire testing<br />
period (dpi 2 – 98).<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
In summary, oral fluid samples were demonstrated to provide<br />
sensitive detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV, SIV, and PCV2. As these<br />
samples could be used for the detection <strong>of</strong> virus in a population
S1 - O - 2<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES OF SEVERAL PRRS ANTIBODY ELISAS IN THE CONTEXT OF A<br />
LONGITUDINALSTUDY OF A FARM USING DIFFERENT VACCINATION STRATEGIES<br />
Strutzberg-Minder K 1 , Seidenspinner M 2 , Schuh H 2 , Böttcher J 3 , Wendt M 4 , Leibold W 5<br />
1 IVD GmbH, Hannover, Germany,<br />
2 Dr. Hermann Schuh, Veterinary Practice, Ipsheim, Germany<br />
3 Bavarian Animal Health Service, Poing, Germany,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, 4 Klinik für kleine Klauentiere, 5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Immunology, Hannover, Germany<br />
PRRS virus, serology<br />
Introduction<br />
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most important diseases in pig farms almost worldwide (1).<br />
The PRRS virus (PRRSv) causes severe economic losses due to<br />
reproductive failures in sows and gilts and respiratory distress in<br />
piglets and fattening pigs (1). Among the objectives <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
was a longitudinal analysis <strong>of</strong> the antibody response following<br />
different vaccination strategies by routine diagnostic ELISA.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study was performed on an intensive pig farm in Germany<br />
with about 120 sows, 450 raising sites and 500 fattened pigs in a<br />
closed system. 8 to 12 piglets <strong>of</strong> 6 sows examined preliminarily<br />
were reassembled in 4 different groups with a total <strong>of</strong> 15 piglets<br />
in each. Blood samples were taken at 10 weeks (w), 13 w, 16 w,<br />
21 w, 26 w and 27 w <strong>of</strong> age. Pigs were vaccinated with Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS (live European PRRSV strain DV, Intervet International,<br />
now: MSD Animal Health, USA) and Progressis ®<br />
(inactivated<br />
PRRSv European strain P120, Merial, UK) as described in the<br />
instruction manuals and in the following table.<br />
Table 1: Vaccination schedule<br />
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> pigs<br />
(red)<br />
(blue)<br />
(green) (yellow)<br />
8 Progressis ®<br />
11<br />
Porcilis ® Porcilis ® Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS<br />
PRRS<br />
PRRS<br />
20 Progressis ® Progressis ®<br />
25<br />
Porcilis ® Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS<br />
PRRS<br />
Progressis ®<br />
Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS<br />
Porcilis®<br />
PRRS<br />
Serum samples were analysed with the following PRRS antibody<br />
ELISAs:<br />
A) HerdChek* PRRS 2XR, IDEXX Laboratories, USA. A<br />
sample/positive control (S/P) ratio (blanked by normal host<br />
cells antigen for control) ≥ 0.400 is positive.*<br />
B) HerdChek* PRRS X3 (now: IDEXX PRRS X3), IDEXX<br />
Laboratories, USA. An S/P ratio (blanked by negative<br />
control, NC) ≥ 0.400 is positive.*<br />
C) INGEZIM PRRS UNIVERSAL, INGENASA, Spain. S/P ratio<br />
transformed in OD%; an OD% > 15 is positive.<br />
D) INGEZIM PRRS EUROPA, INGENASA, Spain. S/P ratio<br />
transformed in OD%; an OD% > 15 is positive.<br />
E) INGEZIM PRRS AMERICA, INGENASA, Spain. S/P ratio<br />
transformed in OD%; an OD% > 15 is positive.<br />
F) CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S (European strains), Laboratories<br />
HIPRA, Spain. An IRPC (Index Relative to Positive Control)<br />
value ((sample - NC) / (PC - NC) x 100) > 20 is positive.<br />
G) CIVTEST SUIS PRRS A/S (American strains), Laboratories<br />
HIPRA, Spain. IRPC value >20 is positive<br />
H) INGEZIM DR, INGENASA, Spain. S/P ratio transformed in<br />
OD%; an OD% > 17.5 is positive.<br />
I) PRRSv, BioChek, The Netherlands. An OD > 0.500 is<br />
positive.*<br />
*Results <strong>of</strong> ELISA with real numbers were multiplied by 100 to<br />
yield a positive integer for better comparison <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
ELISA results in one diagram (Fig. 1). ELISA H and I were used<br />
only for group 2.<br />
Results<br />
The individual course <strong>of</strong> antibody development detected by all<br />
ELISA differed most in group 4. However, the arithmetic means<br />
smoothed the individual differences (Fig. 1). Results for group 4<br />
were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.0606) than for group 1 and 2 at 13<br />
w. Maximum antibody levels were observed between 21 w and<br />
26 w (10 w to 15 w after priming with Porcilis ® PRRS) for all<br />
ELISA (Fig. 1). These peaks were more or less independent <strong>of</strong><br />
subsequent boosting with Progressis ® or with Porcilis ® PRRS (s.<br />
Tab. 1).<br />
Mean <strong>of</strong> ELISA results<br />
3.500<br />
3.000<br />
2.500<br />
2.000<br />
1.500<br />
1.000<br />
0.500<br />
ELISA B<br />
0.000<br />
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> pigs (weeks)<br />
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4<br />
Figure 1: Pigs' developing antibody response (mean ELISA<br />
results) with 4 different PRRSv vaccination strategies detectable<br />
by different ELISAs (here: ELISA B) for PRRSv antibodies<br />
The earliest positive results after exposition with live PRRSv<br />
vaccine at 11 w were detected by ELISAs A and B in at least 6<br />
(group 3) <strong>of</strong> 15 samples and all means <strong>of</strong> all groups (Fig. 2) at 13<br />
w (2 w after priming with Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS). ELISA H tested<br />
positive in all but 2 samples at all dates before and after<br />
vaccination without significant changes in results (Fig. 2). The<br />
earliest positive results <strong>of</strong> the other ELISAs C, D, F and I in<br />
almost all samples and all means <strong>of</strong> groups 1-3 were at 16 w (5 w<br />
after priming with Porcilis ® PRRS) (Fig. 2). Only group 4 tested<br />
positive also by ELISAs C, D and F at 13 w.<br />
Mean <strong>of</strong> ELISA results<br />
450<br />
Group 2<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> pigs (weeks)<br />
ELISA A ELISA B ELISA C ELISA D ELISA F ELISA H ELISA I<br />
Figure 2: Pigs' developing antibody response with different<br />
PRRSv vaccination strategies (here: group 2 mean ELISA<br />
results) detectable by different ELISAs for PRRSv antibodies<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
As ELISA H results did not reflect any PRRS vaccination they<br />
were not useful for understanding antibody development as an<br />
immunological response to PRRSv. The earliest detection <strong>of</strong><br />
exposing pigs to live PRRSv was possible with ELISA A and B at<br />
the first sampling (2 w after priming). Pre-immunization with<br />
Progressis ® (group 4) also made it possible to detect antibodies<br />
against PRRSv at 13 w by the other positive ELISAs C, D and F,<br />
but individual serological pr<strong>of</strong>iles were very heterogeneous, while<br />
all other individual serological pr<strong>of</strong>iles (groups 1-3) were more<br />
homogenous and represented appropriately by the group means.<br />
ELISAs A and B can be used at the latest 2 w after priming with<br />
PRRSv for early detection, and other ELISAs except E, G and H,<br />
for monitoring the antibody response.<br />
References<br />
1. Zimmermann et al. (2006) in: Straw et al. (eds.), Diseases <strong>of</strong> Swine,<br />
9thed., 387-417<br />
Note: These data are in part results <strong>of</strong> the thesis <strong>of</strong> Marc Seidenspinner
S1 - O - 03<br />
INTRODUCTION RATE OF A LOW PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTION IN<br />
DIFFERENT DUTCH POULTRY SECTORS<br />
Jose Gonzales 1 , Guus Koch 1 , Ruth Bouwstra 1 , Armin Elbers 1 , J.J. de Wit 2 , Arjan Stegeman 3<br />
1 Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Lelystad, The Netherlands<br />
2 Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />
3 Utrecht University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Farm Animal Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
Avian Influenza, low pathogenic, introduction rate<br />
Introduction<br />
Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (LPAI) viruses <strong>of</strong> the H5 and H7<br />
subtype have the potential to evolute to Highly Pathogenic Avian<br />
Influenza (HPAI) viruses in poultry and therefore infections with<br />
these subtypes are notifiable . Consequently, member states <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Union have implemented surveillance programmes<br />
(1). In the Netherlands a syndromic surveillance and serological<br />
monitoring programme is in place. In the monitoring programme,<br />
all poultry farms are tested 1-4 times a year. Frequency differs<br />
between the different poultry types and housing systems (indoor<br />
and outdoor layer chickens, broilers, ducks, turkeys, etc) based<br />
on the supposed differences in the risk <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> LPAI<br />
infections. However, quantitative information regarding the<br />
possible differences in risk between these poultry types is sparse.<br />
In this study the rate <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> LPAI in different poultry<br />
types was quantified. .<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Data from the Dutch LPAI surveillance programme(2007–2010)<br />
were analysed using a generalised linear mixed and spatial<br />
model. All poultry farms should be tested at least once a year. In<br />
addition, outdoor-layer farms are tested 3 to 4 times per year.<br />
Farms were identified by their unique farm number (UBN) and<br />
poultry sector (duck-breeders, duck-meat (meat production),<br />
turkeys, broilers, indoor-layers, outdoor- layers, pullets and<br />
breeders). Based on the sampling frequency (time interval<br />
between samplings), the time at risk <strong>of</strong> exposure to a LPAI<br />
infection (“time at risk”) was calculated per poultry sector. For<br />
poultry sectors sampled once a year or once per production<br />
cycle, the age <strong>of</strong> the birds, at the moment <strong>of</strong> sampling, was taken<br />
as the time at risk. For poultry sectors sampled more than once<br />
per production cycle, the average sampling interval was taken as<br />
the time at risk. Positive cases were defined as: 1) farms with at<br />
least one seropositive animal – to any LPAI strain – in both, the<br />
screening test (IDEXX FLockCheck AI MultiS-Screen or agar gel<br />
precipitation, which is only used for broilers) and the confirmatory<br />
test (Hemagglutination Inhibition test) or 2) three or more<br />
positives in the screening test. Furthermore, only primary cases<br />
were included.<br />
Results<br />
The results are summarised in Table 1. Almost all seropositive<br />
results appeared to be single introductions. Results showed that<br />
outdoor-layer farms had a 11, turkey 8, duck-breeder 23 and<br />
meat-duck 13 times higher rate <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> LPAI than<br />
indoor-layer farms.<br />
Table 2. Relative risk (RR), with accompanying lower (LCI) and<br />
upper (UCI) 95% confidence intervals, <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> a LPAIv<br />
infection on poultry farms. Indoor - layers were considered as the<br />
reference category.<br />
Poultry Type<br />
RR<br />
Mean LCI UCL<br />
breeders 0.3 0.0 2.4<br />
pullets 0.7 0.1 5.7<br />
layers indoor 1.0<br />
layers outdoor 11.0 4.9 24.8<br />
turkeys 7.6 2.0 29.0<br />
duck meat 12.8 1.6 102.7<br />
duck breeders 23.0 6.2 85.7<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
Our analysis shows that outdoor-layer farms, duck (breeders and<br />
meat) farms and turkey farms have a significantly higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> a LPAI infection compared to indoor-layer farms.<br />
Breeder ducks have the highest risk. This could be related to 1)<br />
their higher susceptibility to infection with LPAI <strong>of</strong> wild bird origin<br />
(ducks, geese, swans) than chickens, 2) their long production<br />
cycle (time <strong>of</strong> exposure), and 3) their higher exposure to LPAI<br />
from a contaminated environment and/or contact with wild<br />
waterfowl. The latter could also be the reason for the higher risk<br />
observed in outdoor-layer than indoor-layer farms.<br />
In the Netherlands, turkeys are raised indoors and despite the<br />
small population <strong>of</strong> turkey farms, we observed a higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> a LPAI infection on turkeys than indoor-layers.<br />
This higher risk might be partly associated with the apparent<br />
higher susceptibility <strong>of</strong> turkeys to LPAI infections than chickens<br />
(2). We also observed a significant higher risk <strong>of</strong> introduction in<br />
meat-duck farms. This was surprising because this poultry type is<br />
kept indoors and has a short production cycle (6 weeks). The<br />
above mentioned higher susceptibility <strong>of</strong> ducks than chickens<br />
could be one reason for the observed higher risk. Differences in<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> LPAI could be used to (re)design a<br />
targeted risk-based surveillance programme.<br />
References<br />
1.European Commission, 2007. Commission Decision 2007/268/EC <strong>of</strong> 13<br />
April 2007 on the implementation <strong>of</strong> surveillance programmes for avian<br />
influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the Member States<br />
and amending Decision 2004/450/EC. OJEU ;L 115:3.5.2007, p.2003.<br />
2. Tumpey, T, M, Kapczynski, D, R, Swayne, D,E 2004. Comparative<br />
susceptibility <strong>of</strong> chickens and turkeys to avian influenza A H7N2 virus<br />
infection and protective efficacy <strong>of</strong> a commercial avian influenza H7N2<br />
virus vaccine. Avian Diseases 48:167-176.
S1 - O - 04<br />
A DUPLEX ONE-STEP REAL TIME RT-PCR FOR DIAGNOSIS OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE<br />
Kamila Górna, Romey Aurore, Anthony Relmy, Aude Allmandou, Sandra-Blaise Boisseau, Stephan Zientara,<br />
Labib Bakkali Kassimi<br />
ANSES, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, UMR1161 ANSES INRA ENVA, Maisons-Alfort 94706 France<br />
Foot- and –Mouth Disease; Diagnosis; Real Time RT-PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious transboundary<br />
disease <strong>of</strong> wild and domesticated cloven-hooved<br />
ruminants. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most economically devastating<br />
diseases in livestock, due to measures employed to control the<br />
outbreak and trade loss resulting from embargos on the country.<br />
The causative agent, the FMD virus (FMDV), is a single stranded<br />
RNA virus belonging to the Picornaviridae family, genus<br />
Aphtovirus. There are seven immunologically distinct serotypes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the virus, namely types O, A, C, Asia 1, SAT 1, SAT 2 and<br />
SAT 3.<br />
Quick diagnosis <strong>of</strong> FMD is critical for the rapid implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
control measures to limit the spread <strong>of</strong> the virus and eradicate the<br />
disease. The recommended real-time RT-PCR method (rtRT-<br />
PCR) for detection <strong>of</strong> FMDV is a two-step simplex method<br />
targeting conserved regions in the internal ribosomal entry site<br />
within the 5’ untranslated region (IRES) and in the RNA<br />
polymerase gene (3D)(1). In parallel, a rtRT-PCR targeting a<br />
cellular gene (endogenous control) is performed to allow<br />
normalization <strong>of</strong> results. This method has the disadvantage <strong>of</strong><br />
being performed in two separate steps (RT and PCR) and<br />
detects only one target at a time. It is therefore time-consuming,<br />
and since several pipetting steps are required, this method can<br />
be subject to possible errors and contamination. Multiplex rtRT-<br />
PCR is a modification <strong>of</strong> the basic rtRT-PCR method in which<br />
pairs <strong>of</strong> primers targeting different targets are used in the same<br />
reaction. In one-step multiplex rtRT-PCR, the reverse<br />
transcription and subsequent amplification take place in a single<br />
tube, thereby reducing the reaction time and number <strong>of</strong> reaction<br />
mixtures, and also diminishing the risk <strong>of</strong> contamination. In this<br />
study, duplex one-step rtRT-PCRs were established to detect<br />
and type FMDV. These methods are simple, specific, and<br />
sensitive for early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> FMDV infection.<br />
Material & methods<br />
Samples: Artificially FMDV spiked samples were prepared by<br />
making 10 fold serial dilutions <strong>of</strong> virus stock (strains O1 Manisa,<br />
A22 Iraq or Asia 1) in FMDV-free bovine tongue epithelial tissue<br />
suspension. Field bovine epithelium samples (n:19) were<br />
collected from suspected cases in West Africa. Each sample was<br />
subjected to virus isolation, Ag-ELISA, Chromatographic test<br />
(Svanodip) and rtRT-PCR. Virus Isolation: Samples were prediluted<br />
5 and 10 times in cell culture medium and inoculated into<br />
goat tongue cell cultures (ZZ-R). Chromatographic test (lateral<br />
flow device): Svanodip (SVANOVA Biotech AB) test was<br />
performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Antigen<br />
Capture Elisa was performed as described in the OIE manual<br />
(1). rtRT-PCR: RNA was extracted from samples by using the<br />
QIAamp Viral RNA mini-kit (QIAGEN). Two step simplex rtRT-<br />
PCRs for IRES, 3D and -actin targets were performed using<br />
TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents kit and TaqMan PCR<br />
Core Reagents kit (Life technologies) following protocols<br />
described previously (2, 3, 4). One Step duplex rtRT- PCRs were<br />
performed using the AgPath-IDOne-Step RT-PCR Reagents<br />
(Life Technologies). The thermal conditions were as follows: 10<br />
min at 45°C (RT), 10 min at 95°C (denaturation) and 45 cycles <strong>of</strong><br />
15s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. The final concentration <strong>of</strong> primers<br />
and probes in duplex assay was optimized for IRES, 3D and -<br />
actin targets and was as previously described for the typing<br />
protocol (5). Each probe for FMDV specific targets, marked by<br />
FAM dye, was coupled in the same test tube with β-actin probe<br />
labelled with VIC dye.<br />
with two other vesicular disease viruses, swine vesicular disease<br />
and vesicular stomatitis viruses. Artificially FMDV spiked samples<br />
containing different amounts <strong>of</strong> virus were used to compare the<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> FMDV diagnostic methods. Both one-step and twostep<br />
rtRT-PCR methods were 1000 to 10,000 fold more sensitive<br />
than the antigen capture Elisa and Svanodip test. VI and all rtRT-<br />
PCRs displayed quite similar sensitivity. The 3D/-actin duplex<br />
real-time one-step method gave better results than the two-step<br />
method. The serotype-specific one-step duplex rtRT-PCR was<br />
slightly less sensitive than the pan-FMDV one-step duplex rtRT-<br />
PCR method. A better detection <strong>of</strong> the internal β-actin control<br />
was observed with the one-step protocol. All rtRT-PCR methods<br />
were evaluated with 19 field samples. FMDV was isolated from<br />
all samples. The one-step duplex rtRT-PCR for both IRES and<br />
3D targets was more sensitive than the two-step simplex rtRT-<br />
PCR. Moreover, four samples found negative for IRES by a twostep<br />
method were positive using the one-step method. It was not<br />
possible to type the 19 field samples by rtRT-PCR, despite the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> FMDV type O and A in these samples, as revealed<br />
by VP1 sequencing.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
This study reports the development <strong>of</strong> a one-step duplex rtRT-<br />
PCR method for detection <strong>of</strong> FMDV and characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
three most commonly occurring serotypes worldwide. This<br />
method is more sensitive than other recommended FMDV<br />
detection methods tested. Simultaneous detection <strong>of</strong> FMDV and<br />
-actin within the same reaction permits the exclusion <strong>of</strong> false<br />
negatives that may result from improper extraction or degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the RNA, and permits normalization <strong>of</strong> the results. Thus, this<br />
one-step duplex rtRT-PCR method could be <strong>of</strong> interest for FMD<br />
diagnostic laboratories. We were unable to type FMDV from the<br />
field samples by rtRT-PCR. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the FMDV VP1 sequence<br />
from these samples revealed multiple mismatches in the primer<br />
and probe sequences for type O and type A. This is not<br />
surprising since the primers and probes were designed from<br />
sequences <strong>of</strong> FMDV strains belonging to lineages not present in<br />
West Africa (5). New primers and probes specific to WA lineages<br />
will be designed and evaluated. The development <strong>of</strong> a multiplex<br />
one-step rtRT-PCR could provide an improved method for rapid<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> FMDV, as it should allow detection <strong>of</strong> more targets in<br />
the same test and in less time.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The author thanks Jennifer Richardson for editing the English<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the manuscript.<br />
References<br />
1-Manuel <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Test and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, chapter<br />
2.1.5.1C, 2009, OIE.<br />
2- M. Reid et al. Detection <strong>of</strong> all seven serotypes <strong>of</strong> foot-and-mouth<br />
disease virus by real-time, fluorogenic reverse transcription polymerase<br />
chain reaction assay. J. Virol. Methods, 2002, 105 : 67-80<br />
3- JD Callaham et al. Use <strong>of</strong> a portable real-time reverse transcriptasepolymerase<br />
chain reaction assay for rapid detection <strong>of</strong> foot-and-mouth<br />
disease virus. YAVMA, 2002, 220, 11:1636-42.<br />
4- J.F. Toussaint et al. Bluetongue virus detection by two real-time RTqPCR<br />
targeting two different genomic segments. J. Virol. Methods, 2007,<br />
140 : 115-128<br />
5- Reid et al. Detection <strong>of</strong> FMDV serotypes O, A and Asia1 by real-time<br />
RT-PCR. EuFMD 2008 Meeting. The global control <strong>of</strong> FMD – Tools, ideas<br />
and ideals – Erice, Italy 14-17 October 2008.<br />
Results<br />
One step duplex rtRT-PCR methods for pan-FMDV (IRES and<br />
3D) successfully detected all 7 serotypes <strong>of</strong> FMDV. The typing<br />
rtRT-PCRs detected exclusively the specific serotype and did not<br />
cross react with other serotypes. All tests gave negative results
S1 - O -05<br />
VALIDATION OF A COMPETITIVE ELISA FOR THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES ANTI-p26 OF<br />
EQUINE INFECTIOUS ANEMIA VIRUS IN EQUINE SERA<br />
R. Nardini 1 , G.L. Autorino 1 , R.Lorenzetti 1 , P. Cordioli 2 , 1 A. Caprioli, M.T. Scicluna 1<br />
1<br />
National Reference Centre for equine infectious diseases, Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Lazio e Toscana, 00178 Roma Italia. 2 Istituto<br />
Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Emilia Romagna e Lombardia, Via A. Bianchi 9, 25124<br />
Keywords: Equine infectious anemia, competitive ELISA, validation<br />
Introduction<br />
Equine infection anemia (EIA) is a viral infection <strong>of</strong> equidae,<br />
caused by a virus (EIAV) <strong>of</strong> the Lentivirus genus, Retroviridae<br />
family. Hematophagous insects belonging to the Tabanidae,<br />
Hippoboscidae and Muscinae families are involved as passive<br />
vectors in viral transmission. The infection is usually persistent,<br />
and can occur as an asymptomatic form or with recurrent febrile<br />
episodes. Since 2006, Italy has adopted a National Surveillance<br />
Plan (NSP) (1) consisting in a serological screening <strong>of</strong> all animals<br />
except for meat horses. According to the Italian Regulations, the<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial confirmatory test is the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion (AGID)<br />
test which detects antibodies anti-p26, a highly conserved<br />
capsidic protein <strong>of</strong> the virus. Since this technique has a low<br />
detection limit, development <strong>of</strong> new and more sensitive tests has<br />
become necessary. WOAH Manual (2) indicates ELISA,<br />
immunoblotting and PCR as confirmatory tests for the serological<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> EIA. The ELISA, for its characteristics, is the most<br />
suitable for screening purposes. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to<br />
present the results <strong>of</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> a competitive ELISA (c-ELISA)<br />
for the detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies anti-p26 <strong>of</strong> EIAV in equine sera.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The procedure <strong>of</strong> the c-ELISA, object <strong>of</strong> this validation, is briefly<br />
described as following. A 96-well microplate is pre-adsorbed<br />
overnight at 4°C with a monoclonal antibody (Mab) anti-p26.<br />
Serum samples and a recombinant antigen p26, produced in E.<br />
coli, are mixed on a separate plate and incubated at 37°C for 75<br />
minutes. At the end <strong>of</strong> the incubation, the serum-antigen mix is<br />
transferred onto the pre-absorbed plate and a second Mab<br />
conjugated with horseradish peroxidase is added. After another<br />
incubation at 37°C for 75 minutes, ortophenyl-diamine substrate<br />
is added and the plate is incubated at room temperature for 15<br />
minutes in the dark. The reaction is stopped by the addition <strong>of</strong><br />
sulphuric acid and the optical density (OD) is read with a 492nm<br />
filter. Sera are categorized as positive, negative or equivocal<br />
according to the percentage inhibition (PI), calculated as the ratio<br />
between the sample and the internal negative control.<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> the c-Elisa was performed according to WOAH<br />
Manual guidelines (3) and the aim <strong>of</strong> this test was for screening<br />
purposes.<br />
For its validation the following parameters were evaluated.<br />
Analytical specificity was estimated at three different levels:<br />
1. Selectivity, defined as the capability to detect the target<br />
analyte in the presence <strong>of</strong> other interferences, was evaluated by<br />
changing the composition <strong>of</strong> the wash solution and processing<br />
positive and negative International Reference Serum (IRS).<br />
2. Exclusivity, considered as the capacity to discriminate<br />
target analyte from other crossreactive analytes, was evaluated<br />
processing ten sera positive for each <strong>of</strong> the following virus: Feline<br />
Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline Leukaemia Virus and Visna<br />
Maedi Virus. Each sample was repeated ten times.<br />
3. Inclusivity which is how a test can differentiate between<br />
different serovars. p26 protein is highly conserved in this virus<br />
and (4) thus evaluation was not necessary.<br />
Analytical sensitivity is represented by limit <strong>of</strong> detectability (LOD)<br />
and in this validation, the LOD <strong>of</strong> ELISA was compared with the<br />
AGID LOD, analysing progressive dilutions <strong>of</strong> a positive IRS in<br />
both methods.<br />
Repeatability was evaluated estimating the standard deviation<br />
(S r ) <strong>of</strong> the OD values <strong>of</strong> 30 repetitions <strong>of</strong> a negative IRS; this<br />
value was compared with another set <strong>of</strong> 30 values, processed by<br />
the same person during the same session.<br />
Reproducibility was estimated taking into account both qualitative<br />
and quantitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> ELISA test.<br />
a) To analyse qualitative reproducibility a Ring Test was<br />
performed by eleven laboratories and the statistic K <strong>of</strong> Cohen<br />
was calculated.<br />
b)Quantitative reproducibility was evaluated in seven sessions<br />
examining 30 replica <strong>of</strong> negative IRS in each, and calculating S R<br />
<strong>of</strong> OD values.<br />
Diagnostic performances were evaluated from sensitivity (Dse)<br />
and specificity (Dsp). Minimum number <strong>of</strong> samples to evaluate a<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 90% and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 80% with confidence<br />
interval <strong>of</strong> 99% and a precision <strong>of</strong> 5% was calculated. 1095 sera<br />
from field samples and from European Union Reference<br />
Laboratory, consisting in 857 positive and 238 negative samples<br />
were analysed with both ELISA and AGID, using the latter as<br />
Gold standard (GS). Dse, Dsp, positive and negative predictive<br />
values, efficacy and test Bias were calculated (5).<br />
For statistical analysis XL-Stat 2011 ® was used.<br />
Results<br />
1.ELISAs performed changing the washing solution did not<br />
correctly recognise positive and negative sera.<br />
2.All sera positive for other Lentivirus were classified as negative<br />
by the ELISA.<br />
3.LOD <strong>of</strong> ELISA test is at least 1 Log 10 more sensitive than AGID.<br />
4.Comparison between two data sets for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
repeatability did not show significant differences with test F<br />
(p=0.42) and S r resulted to be equal to 0.184.<br />
5.Statistic K value was equal to 0.967.<br />
6.Comparison between seven data sets for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
reproducibility did not show significant differences with test F<br />
(p=0,092) and S r was equal to 0.129.<br />
7.Dse and Dsp resulted respectively 100 and 80,3%.<br />
8.Positive and negative predictive values resulted respectively<br />
94.8% and 100%<br />
9.Efficacy <strong>of</strong> ELISA which is the percentage <strong>of</strong> samples correctly<br />
identified (positive and negative together) compared with the GS<br />
resulted equal to 95.7%<br />
10.Test Bias which is the ratio between apparent and real<br />
prevalence resulted 1.05.<br />
Discussion and conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the parameters evaluated for the validation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
c-ELISA are all satisfactory. In particular, the lower Elisa LOD<br />
would allow not only the detection <strong>of</strong> “poor responders” then<br />
when using the AGID only, but also the possibility <strong>of</strong> detecting<br />
earlier, new cases. Although the Dsp is 80%, this value is still<br />
acceptable for a sreening test compared to the advantages that it<br />
presents to the AGID, i.e the possibility <strong>of</strong> its standardization, the<br />
objectivity <strong>of</strong> the results reading, the lower amount <strong>of</strong> reagents<br />
used and the higher processing <strong>of</strong> samples per unit time. The use<br />
<strong>of</strong> this diagnostic test is an added value, together with other<br />
measures, in a control programme for AIE.<br />
ReferenceS<br />
1.Ordinanza 8 agosto 2010 Piano di sorveglianza nazionale per l'anemia<br />
infettiva degli equidi. G.U. Serie Generale n. 219 del 18 settembre 2010<br />
2.Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2010,<br />
Chapter 2 . 5 . 6 .Equine infectious anaemia<br />
3.Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals<br />
2010,Chapter 1.1.4/5. Principles <strong>of</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> diagnostic assays for<br />
infectious diseases.<br />
4.Charles J. Issel, R. Frank Cook (1993)REVIEW ARTICLE A review <strong>of</strong><br />
techniques for the serologic diagnosis <strong>of</strong> equine infectious anemia J Vet<br />
Diagn Invest 5: 137-141<br />
5.Signorelli C. Elementi di metodologia epidemiologica SEU, 2005
S1 - O - 06<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF A COMMERCIAL PRRS SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA ADAPTED TO<br />
ORAL FLUID SPECIMENS: FIELD SAMPLES<br />
Apisit Kittawornrat 1 , John Prickett 1 , Chong Wang 1, 2 , Chris Olsen 1 , Yaowalak Panyasing 1 , Andrea Ballagi 3 ,<br />
Anna Rice 3 , Sergio Lizano 3 , John Johnson 1 , Rodger Main 1 , Chris Rademacher 4 , Marlin Hoogland 4 ,<br />
Jeffrey Zimmerman 1<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States, 3 IDEXX<br />
Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine, United States, 4 Murphy-Brown LLC, Ames, Iowa, United States<br />
Oral fluid, ELISA, Field samples, PRRSV<br />
Introduction<br />
Oral fluid samples are <strong>of</strong> interest because <strong>of</strong> their ease <strong>of</strong><br />
collection and documented use in surveillance <strong>of</strong> PRRSV and<br />
other pathogens (1,2). Previous work showed that a commercial<br />
PRRS ELISA (HerdChek® PRRS X3 ELISA) could be adapted to<br />
detect anti-PRRSV IgG in oral fluid specimens (IgG ELISA). The<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the current study was to evaluate the ability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assay to detect anti-PRRSV IgG antibody in pen-based oral fluid<br />
field samples.<br />
References<br />
1. Kittawornrat A, et al. 2010. PRRSV in serum and oral fluid samples from<br />
individual boars. Virus Res 154:170-176.<br />
2. Prickett, J et al.: 2011. Prolonged detection <strong>of</strong> PCV2 and anti-PCV2<br />
antibody in oral fluids following experimental inoculation. Transbound<br />
Emerg Dis 58:121-127<br />
3. Ramirez et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Efficient surveillance <strong>of</strong> pig populations using oral<br />
fluids. Prev Vet Med (Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Positive samples were derived from a longitudinal field study in<br />
10 wean-to-finish barns (3). At each site, oral fluid samples were<br />
collected from the same 6 pens at 2-week intervals (total <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
sampling points per barn). Positive oral fluid samples were<br />
defined as all samples collected from a pen after the first PRRSV<br />
PCR positive oral fluid sample from that pen (n = 250). Negative<br />
oral fluid (n = 284) field samples were diagnostic samples<br />
submitted to the ISU VDL for PRRSV qRT-PCR testing from<br />
expected-negative herds.<br />
Results<br />
The cumulative S/P results for defined positive and negative oral<br />
fluid samples are given in Figure 1. Of 284 expected-negative<br />
field samples, all were negative on the IgG ELISA (S/P
S1 - O - 07<br />
SUBTYPING OF SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUSES BY MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME PCR<br />
Kees van Maanen 1 , Ingrid Wiggers 1 , Chris Schouten 3 , Tom Duinh<strong>of</strong> 1 , Paolo Cordioli 2 , Remco Dijkman 1<br />
1<br />
GD-Animal Health Service, Diagnostics,Research and Epidemiology,Deventer , the Netherlands<br />
2 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Esperimentale Brescia, the Netherlands<br />
3 DAP Aadal, Erp, the Netherlands<br />
Swine Influenza Virus; real-time PCR; subtyping; lung lavage samples; diagnosis<br />
Introduction<br />
Swine influenza is an acute respiratory disease <strong>of</strong> swine caused<br />
by type A influenza viruses. In Europe, swine influenza is<br />
considered one <strong>of</strong> the most important primary pathogens <strong>of</strong> swine<br />
respiratory disease and infection is primarily with H1N1, H1N2<br />
and H3N2 influenza A viruses. Avian-like H1N1 and human-like<br />
H3N2 swine influenza viruses (SIV) have been considered<br />
widespread among pigs in Western Europe since the 1980s, and<br />
a novel H1N2 reassortant with a human-like H1 emerged in the<br />
mid 1990s. These viruses have remained endemic in European<br />
pig populations but significant differences in the circulation <strong>of</strong><br />
these strains occur at a regional level across Europe (1,2).<br />
For diagnosis <strong>of</strong> swine influenza infections serological and<br />
virological tests can be used. For detection <strong>of</strong> subtype-specific<br />
antibodies HI-tests are commonly used. However, crossreactions<br />
can occur, and the interpretation can be difficult<br />
depending on the vaccination and infection history <strong>of</strong> the herd.<br />
For diagnosis <strong>of</strong> recent infections paired serum samples are<br />
required collected with a 2-3 week interval.<br />
For rapid detection and discrimination <strong>of</strong> the different swine<br />
influenza subtypes several PCRs have been described. However,<br />
these methods were either conventional PCRs, targetted only the<br />
Haemagglutinin gene, or the coverage for European SIV strains<br />
was too low according to our BLAST analysis results.<br />
Therefore we decided to develop an in-house subtype-specific<br />
SIV real-time PCR. In the course <strong>of</strong> the project a prototype realtime<br />
PCR for detection and differentiation <strong>of</strong> SIV (Life<br />
Technologies) became available and was also evaluated.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
In this study two RNA extraction methods (High Pure nucleic acid<br />
kit, Roche Applied Science, and MagMax AM1836, Life<br />
Technologies) were compared in combination with either the inhouse<br />
designed primer/probe sets + AgPath-ID multiplex onestep<br />
RT-PCR kit (Life Technologies) or a prototype SIV<br />
Screening qRT-PCR kit (Life Technologies). All tests were run on<br />
an ABI7500 fast platform.<br />
Primers and probes were designed in silico using GenBank SIV<br />
sequences <strong>of</strong> the last 15 years. Primers and probes should have<br />
a coverage <strong>of</strong> at least 95%, and were used in working dilutions <strong>of</strong><br />
10 and 5 µM, respectively. Primers and probes were designed to<br />
enable all sorts <strong>of</strong> combinations (singleplex, multiplex H+N,<br />
multiplex N and multiplex H in parallel). Test results were<br />
compared with the results <strong>of</strong> an influenza A real-time PCR<br />
targetting the M gene that had been validated and implemented<br />
several years ago.<br />
Detection limits and efficiency were determined for decimal<br />
dilution series <strong>of</strong> H1N1, H3N2, and H1N2 reference viruses, as<br />
compared with the influenza A matrix real-time PCR. Subtypespecificity<br />
was evaluated by testing 22 different SIV strains<br />
provided by the IZSLER institute, Brescia, Italy. Diagnostic<br />
performance for lung lavage samples was evaluated by testing<br />
influenza A PCR positive pooled lung lavage samples (n=17) <strong>of</strong><br />
4, 7 and 10 week old piglets. For some pools the lung lavage<br />
samples that contributed to the pool were also tested individually<br />
(n=25) in order to compare the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> subtyping results<br />
and the presence <strong>of</strong> dual infections.<br />
Results<br />
For the haemagglutinin genes <strong>of</strong> H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses<br />
81, 36, and 61 entries were aligned for the development <strong>of</strong><br />
primer/probe sets. For the neuraminidase genes <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
subtypes 67, 28, and 25 entries were aligned for the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> primer/probe sets.<br />
Both for the in-house PCRs and for the prototype SIV Screening<br />
qRT-PCR kit RNA extraction with the MagMax AM1836 kit<br />
yielded 10-100 times lower detection limits than the High Pure<br />
nucleic acid kit. Using the MagMax AM1836 kit for RNA<br />
extraction, the detection limits <strong>of</strong> the in-house PCRs and the<br />
prototype commercial kit were comparable for the neuraminidase<br />
genes, whereas detection limits showed more variation for the<br />
haemagglutin genes. Overall, the detection limits <strong>of</strong> the subtypespecific<br />
primer/probe sets were equivalent to 10 times higher<br />
than the detection limit <strong>of</strong> the influenza A real-time PCR targeting<br />
the matrix gene.<br />
Subtype-specificity <strong>of</strong> the in-house PCR and the commercial kit<br />
were investigated by blind testing <strong>of</strong> a panel <strong>of</strong> Swine influenza<br />
virus isolates (H1N1 n=10; H1N2 n=4; H3N8 n=8) generously<br />
provided by the IZSLER institute, Brescia, Italy. The in-house<br />
PCRs failed to subtype several strains and also one probe<br />
appeared to be labile. In contrast the prototype commercial kit<br />
subtyped 21/22 strains correctly (for one sample a dual infection<br />
was reported, whereas this sample only contained H3N2). All<br />
strains were detected with the influenza A matrix PCR with Ctvalues<br />
ranging from 20-33.<br />
A first diagnostic evaluation <strong>of</strong> the commercial kit was performed<br />
by testing influenza A positive (results from another laboratory)<br />
pooled lung lavage samples (n=17) from piglets <strong>of</strong> 4-10 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
age. All pools were also tested in our in-house influenza A PCR<br />
and results were confirmed. In the subtype-specific PCR 15/17<br />
pools yielded a single subtype (H1N2: n=9; H1N1: n=5; H3N2:<br />
n=1), whereas 2 pools yielded 2 or 3 subtypes. Retesting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
individual lung lavage samples that contributed to the latter pools<br />
confirmed the presence <strong>of</strong> dual infections in the majority <strong>of</strong> these<br />
piglets. Retesting <strong>of</strong> the individual lung lavage samples <strong>of</strong> three<br />
pools that were subtyped unequivocally yielded exactly the same<br />
subtype in all individual samples.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
Influenza viruses are highly variable RNA viruses that show rapid<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> especially the haemagglutinin and neuraminidase<br />
genes. Therefore, development <strong>of</strong> reliable PCR protocols for the<br />
subtyping <strong>of</strong> these viruses is not easy. Despite the effort we<br />
spent on selection <strong>of</strong> primers and probes, the results <strong>of</strong> our inhouse<br />
PCR were disappointing and inferior when compared to a<br />
prototype commercial real-time PCR kit.<br />
The latter kit showed a good performance when combined with<br />
RNA extraction on a MagMax AM1836 platform. Detection limits<br />
were comparable to tenfold higher than the influenza A matrix<br />
PCR, 95% <strong>of</strong> well-defined SIV strains were subtyped correctly,<br />
and the test also demonstrated a good diagnostic performance<br />
for subtyping <strong>of</strong> influenza A positive lung lavage samples.<br />
Although some practices in the Netherlands are very experienced<br />
in collecting lung lavage samples, the method is cumbersome;<br />
collecting other types <strong>of</strong> samples like nasal swabs or chewing<br />
ropes is much less invasive laborious. However, nasal and oral<br />
virus excretion is <strong>of</strong>ten short-lived. In the next study we will<br />
evaluate the diagnostic performance <strong>of</strong> real-time influenza A PCR<br />
and subtype-specific PCRs for nasal swabs and chewing ropes in<br />
fattening pigs with acute respiratory disease.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank Life Technologies for generously providing the<br />
prototype SIV Screening qRT-PCR kit for this study.<br />
References<br />
1. Van Reeth, K, Brown, IH, Dürrwald, R, Foni, E, Labarque, G, Lenihan,<br />
P, Maldonado, J,,Markowska-Daniel, I, Pensaert, M, Pospisil, Z, Koch, G<br />
(2008). Seroprevalence <strong>of</strong> H1N1, H3N2 and H1N2 influenza viruses in pigs<br />
in seven European countries in 2002-2003. Influenza Other Respi Viruses,<br />
2(3), 99-105.<br />
2: Brown, IH (<strong>2012</strong>). History and Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Swine Influenza in<br />
Europe. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol Jan 11. [Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print].
S1 - O - 08<br />
IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUOUS VALIDATION OF MOLECULAR METHODS FOR ROUTINE<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF PRRSV RNA IN CLINICAL SAMPLES<br />
Sandra Revilla-Fernández 1 , Adolf Steinrigl 1 , Tatjana Sattler 2 , Friedrich Schmoll 1<br />
1<br />
AGES Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Department for Molecular Biology, Robert Koch Gasse 17, 2340 Mödling, Austria<br />
2<br />
Large Animal Clinic for Internal Medicine, University Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 11, 04103 Leipzig, Germany<br />
PRRSV, real-time PCR, sensitivity, specificity, validation<br />
Introduction<br />
PPRSV is a small, enveloped, positive single-stranded RNA virus<br />
belonging to the Arteriviridae family, recognised world-wide as an<br />
important cause <strong>of</strong> reproductive failure and pneumonia in pigs.<br />
Since PRRSV was first described at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 1990´s,<br />
wide genomic, antigenic and clinical differences have been<br />
described in isolates belonging to the European (EU) and North<br />
American (NA) genotypes. Several molecular-based methods like<br />
conventional and real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) were<br />
demonstrated to be fit for detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV in clinical samples.<br />
However, the high mutation rate <strong>of</strong> PRRSV poses a diagnostic<br />
challenge (4, 5). Therefore, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />
perform an in-house evaluation <strong>of</strong> recently established PRRSV<br />
molecular diagnostic methods and to compare them. Six different<br />
assays were tested with a series <strong>of</strong> PRRSV EU and NA field<br />
strains from different subtypes and origin. Diagnostic and<br />
analytical sensitivity and specificity were extensively studied. This<br />
is essential to control the disease spread and to guarantee the<br />
negative status <strong>of</strong> the herds (1).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Six different one-step RT-PCR-based assays (Table 1), including<br />
one published RT-qPCR (3), four commercially available kits and<br />
one conventional ORF7 duplex RT-nested PCR (2) were tested<br />
for assay sensitivity and specificity with a series <strong>of</strong> PRRSV EU<br />
and NA field strains from Central Europe and Russia, samples<br />
from two European Ring trials and dilution series <strong>of</strong> in vitro EU<br />
and NA transcripts. The target sequences for the commercial RTqPCR<br />
kits were unknown. All but one test distinguish between<br />
EU and NA genotypes (Table 1). Runs were performed in two<br />
different real-time PCR cyclers. The ORF5 region <strong>of</strong> field<br />
samples was sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed with<br />
Bionumerics S<strong>of</strong>tware (Applied Maths), using reference strains <strong>of</strong><br />
all PRRSV genotypes and subgroups (4, 5). Quantitative RTqPCR<br />
data (Cq values) was analysed statistically by 2-sided<br />
paired t-test.<br />
Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> PRRSV PCR methods applied for<br />
validation, references and system descriptions<br />
conven<br />
-tional<br />
RTqPCR<br />
Assay<br />
Ref.<br />
comm. = commercially available<br />
Differentiation<br />
NA/EU<br />
RNA Input<br />
(µl)<br />
ORF7 2 yes, one-tube 3.5<br />
ORF6 3 yes, two-tube 5<br />
Kit A comm. yes, one-tube 8<br />
Kit B comm. yes, one-tube 5<br />
Kit C comm. no 5<br />
Kit D comm. yes, one-tube 5<br />
Results<br />
In general, the commercially available RT-qPCR kits showed<br />
higher sensitivity than the conventional method. RT-qPCR<br />
efficiency and sensitivity calculated from serial dilutions <strong>of</strong><br />
standard EU and NA PRRSV strains were optimal. However,<br />
specificity problems were seen with the published ORF6 based<br />
assay to detect some regional EU strains and the highly<br />
pathogenic (HP) NA strains. EU-1 field strains from Austria,<br />
Slovenia and Russia were equally well detected by all assays<br />
tested, whereas German strains showed the highest inter-assay<br />
differences.<br />
Taking into account different RNA sample inputs, statistical<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> Cq values confirmed relevant differences between<br />
assays: lowest Cq values, indicating highest analytical sensitivity,<br />
were consistently observed with kits A, B and C. However, kit A<br />
did not efficiently detect some EU-2 and EU-unassigned strains,<br />
whereas kit B showed problems resulting from crosstalk between<br />
fluorescence channels in one <strong>of</strong> the real-time PCR cyclers used<br />
for validation, leading to false positive results. Kit C had<br />
specificity problems with NA HP strains included in one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ring trials. The conventional RT-PCR method was shown to be<br />
less sensitive than the commercial real-time PCR Kits. Moreover,<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> double infection with both genotypes was not<br />
possible by real-time PCR with kit C and difficult when using the<br />
RT-nested PCR.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
As shown, in-house validation may be helpful to identify the bestsuited<br />
methods for PRRSV diagnosis. To overcome these key<br />
aspects in PRRSV diagnosis, continuous re-validation <strong>of</strong> applied<br />
methods is necessary. If this is not possible, diagnostic<br />
laboratories should closely collaborate with the manufacturers <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial kits, supporting them with new field strains and with<br />
field observations.<br />
In many European countries, as in Austria or Germany, both EU<br />
and NA strains can be detected within the same herd or even<br />
within the same animal (1, and personal observations). In this<br />
situation, differentiation <strong>of</strong> both PRRSV genotypes is directly<br />
demanded by the clinical veterinarians since it is useful<br />
information for animal trade and epidemiological studies.<br />
In conclusion, this validation shows that there is currently no<br />
single assay or commercial kit with optimal analytic and<br />
diagnostic sensitivity. This indicates that various laboratory<br />
technical specifications, including the PCR machines, should be<br />
also considered for evaluation to avoid false results. The major<br />
problem to underline is the low specificity <strong>of</strong> some assays for<br />
detecting the newly evolved PRRSV strains that are<br />
underestimated if only PRRSV reference strains are considered<br />
for validation. Consequently, continuous evaluation and<br />
adaptation <strong>of</strong> routinely applied methods to currently circulating<br />
strains is necessary in each laboratory.<br />
References<br />
1. Große Beilage E, Bätza HJ. (2007): PRRSV-Eradikation: Eine Option für<br />
Schweinebestände in Deutschland? PRRSV-eradication: An option for pig<br />
herds in Germany? Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr. 120, 11/12,470-479.<br />
2. Reiner G, Fresen C, Bronnert S, Willems H. (2009): Porcine<br />
Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) infection in wild<br />
boars. Vet Microbiol. 12;136(3-4):250-8.<br />
3. Revilla-Fernández S, Wallner B, Truschner K, Benczak A, Brem G,<br />
Schmoll F, Mueller M, Steinborn R. (2005): The use <strong>of</strong> endogenous and<br />
exogenous reference RNAs for qualitative and quantitative detection <strong>of</strong><br />
PRRSV in porcine semen. J Virol Methods. 126:21-30.<br />
4. Shi M, Lam TT, Hon CC, Hui RK, Faaberg KS, Wennblom T, Murtaugh<br />
MP, Stadejek T, Leung FC. (2010): Molecular epidemiology <strong>of</strong> PRRSV: a<br />
phylogenetic perspective. Virus Res. 154(1-2):7-17.<br />
5. Stadejek T, Oleksiewicz MB, Scherbakov AV, Timina AM, Krabbe JS,<br />
Chabros K, Potapchuk D. (2008): Definition <strong>of</strong> subtypes in the European<br />
genotype <strong>of</strong> porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus:<br />
nucleocapsid characteristics and geographical distribution in Europe. Arch<br />
Virol. 153(8):1479-88.
S1 - O - 09<br />
VIRAL DIAGNOSIS USING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY<br />
W.A. Cooley and D. J. Everest<br />
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, Bio-Imaging Unit, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK<br />
Diagnosis, Electron Microscopy, Virus detection<br />
Introduction<br />
The size <strong>of</strong> most viruses places them well below the resolving<br />
power <strong>of</strong> the standard light microscope. However they are quite<br />
readily viewed and identified by transmission electron microscopy<br />
(TEM) and therefore TEM has provided contributions to virology<br />
and in particular to the discovery, detection and diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
various viral infections. Virus diagnosis by electron microscopy is<br />
based on the visualization and morphological identification <strong>of</strong><br />
virus particles. Molecular or immunological methods, such as<br />
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Enzyme Linked Immuno<br />
Sorbent Assay (ELISA), are very effective in detecting known<br />
viruses and can be used to scrutinize a large amount <strong>of</strong> samples.<br />
However, one <strong>of</strong> the main advantages <strong>of</strong> using TEM for viral<br />
diagnosis is that it does not require organism-specific reagents<br />
for recognizing the pathogenic agent. Therefore, for new or<br />
unknown pathogens that may occur in the context <strong>of</strong> bio-terrorism<br />
attacks, or as a result <strong>of</strong> the manifestation <strong>of</strong> new pathogens,<br />
electron microscopy remains the only method that can provide a<br />
quick assessment <strong>of</strong> all pathogens present in a sample, providing<br />
an “open view”, which is why electron microscopy is considered a<br />
“catch all method”. Electron microscopy can also be used to<br />
investigate viruses isolated in cell cultures, which is useful in<br />
controlling the results <strong>of</strong> the virus isolation process, among other<br />
applications. The AHVLA at Weybridge, UK, provides a rapid<br />
(diagnosis within 15 minutes <strong>of</strong> arrival) viral diagnostic service for<br />
various diseases affecting farmed livestock and wildlife species<br />
through veterinary surveillance as part <strong>of</strong> the Great Britain<br />
Wildlife Disease Surveillance Partnership and also for captive<br />
and zoological animals. The samples most frequently received for<br />
viral examination in our diagnostic TEM laboratory are fresh<br />
unfixed samples such as scabs, warts, gut and faecal samples.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
For viral diagnosis we perform the negative staining procedure.<br />
This is a simple, rapid and well suited technique for the<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> small particulate suspensions. For viewing the<br />
particulate specimens for organisms such as viruses, a support<br />
membrane must first be prepared onto our TEM grids. This will<br />
provide a support platform to hold the small particles. Examples<br />
<strong>of</strong> support films we may use include Formvar, Collodion, Butvar,<br />
and Piol<strong>of</strong>orm. Once the grids are coated with the films, they are<br />
then stabilized by evaporating a thin carbon coat over them to<br />
render them conductive and keep them from melting in the<br />
electron beam followed by plasma glowing, to ensure the grids<br />
are highly hydrophilic, to obtain maximum sample adsorption The<br />
received samples are now ground in the presence <strong>of</strong> a phosphate<br />
buffer to break up the tissue and release any viral particles which<br />
may be present. A drop <strong>of</strong> the ground suspension is then<br />
adsorbed onto the coated grid for 30 seconds. After wicking dry<br />
with a piece <strong>of</strong> filter paper the grid with sample now adsorbed to<br />
the surface is then floated on a drop <strong>of</strong> negative stain for about<br />
one minute. The most common negative stains are 1% (60 mM)<br />
aqueous uranyl acetate, pH 2-4.5, and 2% (5 mM)<br />
phosphotungstic acid, pH adjusted to 6.6 with NaOH. After<br />
approximately 15 seconds on the negative stain any excess stain<br />
is wicked away and the grid air dried after which it is ready for<br />
examination by TEM. Structures on the grid are surrounded and<br />
stabilized by the drying stain, thus they appear as transparent,<br />
highly detailed negative images within a dark halo <strong>of</strong> stain.<br />
Results<br />
Amongst the most common viruses we diagnose are the<br />
poxviruses (Fig 1-3). These viruses infect both vertebrate and<br />
invertebrate animals and are <strong>of</strong>ten detected from cattle, sheep<br />
and goats causing external scabby lesions. The virus group is<br />
well known as it includes smallpox (variola) an orthopoxvirus.<br />
Poxviruses are regarded as the major contributor responsible for<br />
the decline in the UK <strong>of</strong> the indigenous Red Squirrel (Sciurus<br />
vulgaris). This is due to its susceptibility to Squirrel pox virus<br />
(SQPV). This invariable fatal disease was first reported in 1981<br />
(1) using TEM at the AHVLA. SQPV is approximately the same<br />
size and shape (ovoid) as the parapoxvirus and is differentiated<br />
using TEM due to differences in the spiral coat (longitudinal as<br />
opposed to transverse). TEM is also used to detect ‘enteric<br />
viruses’ which are an important, but diverse, group <strong>of</strong> viruses<br />
found in the intestinal tract <strong>of</strong> animals (and humans). Examples<br />
which we commonly detect are rotavirus and adenovirus.<br />
Adenovirus (Fig.4) is also an emerging problem contributing to<br />
the decline <strong>of</strong> the Red Squirrel and was first reported in 1997 (2)<br />
using TEM at the AHVLA. As mentioned above, the “open view”<br />
occasionally detects mixed viral infections. A published example<br />
(3) being both parapox and calicivirus detected in a scab from a<br />
Grey Seal (Halichoerus grypus). Calicivirus is also the cause <strong>of</strong><br />
Rabbit haemorrhagic disease or viral haemorrhagic disease<br />
(VHD). This is a highly infectious and <strong>of</strong>ten fatal disease that<br />
affects wild and domestic rabbits and was a notifiable disease in<br />
the UK for several years during the 1990s.<br />
Fig. 1. Squirrel poxvirus, 2. Parapoxvirus, 3. Orthopoxvirus, 4.<br />
Adenovirus.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
TEM remains essential for certain diagnostic aspects <strong>of</strong> Virology<br />
(and bacteriology). It was and still is necessary for new virus<br />
characterization and for the initial identification <strong>of</strong> unknown viral<br />
agents in particular outbreaks. This especially applies to<br />
veterinary virology, in which several agents are continuously<br />
being identified with this technique over the past few years. It is<br />
also recommended by regulatory agencies for investigations <strong>of</strong><br />
the viral safety <strong>of</strong> biological products and/or cells. The nature <strong>of</strong><br />
the samples to be analyzed can be tremendously diverse, from<br />
body fluids or biopsies performed or scabs, warts, gut and faecal<br />
samples. An additional advantage <strong>of</strong> electron microscopy is<br />
through its reassurance in having the picture <strong>of</strong> the screened<br />
virus and “a picture is worth a thousand words”. The results by<br />
TEM are therefore <strong>of</strong>ten regarded by many as the 'Gold<br />
Standard', as viral particles are actually observed. The “open<br />
view” approach <strong>of</strong> electron microscopy permits rapid and “catchall”<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> viruses, if these are present in a detectable<br />
concentration, and makes it especially useful as demonstrated<br />
here for the identification and diagnosis <strong>of</strong> various animal viruses,<br />
as well as being used in the initial identification <strong>of</strong> unknown viral<br />
agents in particular disease emergencies and outbreaks and/or in<br />
suspected bioterrorism.<br />
References<br />
1. Scott, A. C., Keymer, I. F. and Labram, J. (1981). Parapoxvirus infection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). Vet. Rec. 109, 202.<br />
2. Sainsbury, A.W., Adair, B., Graham, D., Gurnell, J., Cunningham, A.A.,<br />
Benko, M. and Papp, T. (2001). Isolation <strong>of</strong> a novel adenovirus associated<br />
with splenitis, diarrhoea, and mortality in trans-located red squirrels,<br />
Sciurus vulgaris. Verhandlungs Bericht über die Erkrankung der Zootiere<br />
40, 265-270.<br />
3. Stack M.J., Simpson V.R. and Scott AC (1993). “Mixed poxvirus and<br />
calicivirus infections <strong>of</strong> grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in Cornwall.” Vet.<br />
Rec. 132: 163-165.
S1 - O - 10<br />
A BEAD BASED MULTIPLEX IMMUNOFLUOROMETRIC ASSAY FOR SCREENING AND<br />
CONFIRMATION OF ALL MAJOR PRION TYPES IN SHEEP<br />
Yue Tang 1 , Jan PM Langeveld 2 , Adriana Gielbert 1 , Jorg G Jacobs 2 , Thierry Baron 3 , Olivier Andreoletti 4 , Takashi<br />
Yokoyama 5 , Alex Bossers 1 , Maurice J Sauer 2<br />
1<br />
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK<br />
Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong> Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands<br />
Agence Francaise de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments Lyon, Lyon, France<br />
UMR INRA ENVT 1225, 31076 Toulouse, France<br />
National Institue <strong>of</strong> Animal Health,Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan<br />
Scrapie, discrimination, TSE, BSE, prion, multiplex, assay<br />
Introduction<br />
Prion diseases or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies<br />
(TSEs) in small ruminants are presented in many forms: classical<br />
scrapie, Nor98/atypical scrapie, CH1641 scrapie and bovine<br />
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The discrimination between<br />
BSE and CH1641 is especially <strong>of</strong> interest for food safety reasons,<br />
but also methods that can directly co recognize atypical<br />
Nor98/scrapie cases are lacking.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
We previously described a multiplex immun<strong>of</strong>luorometric assay<br />
(mIFMA), based on a bead array flow cytometry technology,<br />
which provided, in a single assay, discrimination between BSE (in<br />
cattle and sheep) and classical scrapie (Tang et al., 2010). In this<br />
study, we extended the mlFMA assay to differentiate classical<br />
scrapie, atypical scrapie, BSE (experimentally infected sheep and<br />
naturally infected cattle) and CH1641 (both experimental and<br />
natural CH1641-like infections in sheep). Three prion protein<br />
(PrP) specific capture antibodies were used, two distinct<br />
N-terminus specific antibodies 12B2 and 9A2, and core specific<br />
antibody 94B4 (Fig. 1). Western blotting procedures were as<br />
described for discriminating bovine BSE types (Langeveld et al.,<br />
2011).<br />
Figure 1. The principle <strong>of</strong> discrimination <strong>of</strong> BSE/CH1641, scrapie<br />
and atypical scrapie using multiplex IFMA.After PK digestion,<br />
9A2, 12B2 and 94B4 antibodies can all bind to classical scrapie<br />
PrP res ; only 9A2 and 94B4 bind substantially to BSE and CH1641<br />
PrP res ; only 12B2 and 9A2 bind substantially to atypical scrapie<br />
PrP res<br />
.The capture antibodies 12B2 for amino acid residues<br />
93 - 97, 9A2 for ovine PrP N-terminal amino acid residues 102104,<br />
and 94B4 for amino acid residues 190-197, are coupled to<br />
distinct bead types. The reporter antibody Sha31 (epitope;<br />
residues 148-155) is biotinylated. Theoretical idealised pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong><br />
MFI readings, associated with 12B2 (black filled bar), 9A2<br />
(unfilled bar) and 94B4 (grey filled bar) respectively, are indicated<br />
on the right side <strong>of</strong> the simplified representation <strong>of</strong> the PrP res<br />
protein primary structure. CH1641 may be differentiated from<br />
BSE by analysis <strong>of</strong> a minor 14 kDa C-terminal fragment and also,<br />
the 9A2 region might be different from BSE which would result in<br />
lower 9A2 values than in BSE.<br />
suggesting that major PrP Sc cleavage <strong>of</strong> the N-terminus occurs<br />
further towards the C terminus in CH1641 than in BSE. The ratios<br />
<strong>of</strong> 12B2/94B4 and 9A2/94B4 were similar between experimental<br />
CH1641 and CH1641-like cases, although two CH1641 like<br />
subjects displayed slightly elevated ratios <strong>of</strong> both 12B2/94B4 and<br />
9A2/94B4. To verify this finding for PrP res , mass spectrometry<br />
quantification to determine the absolute abundance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
peptides associated with all three antibody binding regions<br />
confirmed that there was a 2.2 fold reduction <strong>of</strong> peptides<br />
containing the 9A2 epitope for experimental CH1641 PrP res<br />
in<br />
comparison to BSE PrP res . Observation <strong>of</strong> reduced PrP res<br />
may<br />
serve as a new marker for CH1641. Finally, Western blotting<br />
further confirmed that the CH1641-like cases have to be<br />
considered as a TSE class different from the experimental<br />
CH1641 cases.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
This mIFMA may thus provide the basis for simplified TSE<br />
diagnosis with capability for simultaneous screening and<br />
differential diagnosis.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Financial support for this work was provided by the Department<br />
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra, UK; project<br />
SE1700/ CSA 7335). JPML is partly supported by the Dutch<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality project number<br />
WOT-01-002-14 001.01. JPML and OA are partly supported by<br />
the EU STREP project GoatBSE FOOD15 CT-2006-36353. We<br />
thank Linda Davis and Sharon Everitt for Western blotting<br />
analysis. The help <strong>of</strong> Dr Marion Simmons and the VLA TSE<br />
Archive team for provision <strong>of</strong> samples is gratefully acknowledged.<br />
References<br />
1. Tang, Y, Thorne, J, Whatling,K, Jacobs, J, Langeveld, J and Sauer, M.<br />
2010. A single step multiplex immun<strong>of</strong>luorometric assay for differential<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> BSE and scrapie. J. Immunol Meth. 356:29–38.<br />
2. Langeveld, JPM, Erkens, JHF, Rammel, I, Jacobs, JG, Davidse, A, van<br />
Zijderveld, F, Bossers, A, and Schildorfer, H. 2011. Four independent<br />
molecular prion protein parameters for discriminating new cases <strong>of</strong> C, L,<br />
and H BSE in cattle. J Clin Microbiol., 49:3026–3028.<br />
Results<br />
All three antibodies were shown to bind classical scrapie PrP res<br />
strongly, whereas in Nor98/atypical scrapie PrP res only 12B2 and<br />
9A2 binding was observed. PrP res binding <strong>of</strong> 12B2 was low for<br />
both BSE and CH1641, as expected. Furthermore, analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
serially diluted samples indicated that the assay provided a<br />
similar level <strong>of</strong> sensitivity for atypical scrapie as that found using<br />
a well established commercial test. Unexpectedly, 9A2 binding to<br />
CH1641 PrPres was reduced by 2.1 fold both for experimental<br />
CH1641 and CH1641 like scrapie when compared with BSE,
S1 - O - 11<br />
USING ORAL FLUID FOR THE SEROLOGICAL MONITORIZATION OF PRRSV CIRCULATION IN A<br />
GROUP OF INFECTED GILTS<br />
Martos-Raich, Alba 1 , Coma-Oliva, Ester 1 ; Serra-Martínez, Jordi 2 ; Barrera-Toro, Xavier 3 ; Planasdemunt-Regàs,<br />
Llorenç 3 ; Maldonado-García, Jaime 1 ; Porquet-Garanto, Lourdes 1 ; Rebordosa-Trigueros, Xavier 1 .<br />
1 HIPRA 17170 Amer, Girona, Spain.<br />
2 Bi<strong>of</strong>ar Laboratoris, S.L 08261 Cardona, Barcelona, Spain.<br />
3 AVP Planasdemunt i Associats 17400 Breda, Girona, Spain<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> oral fluid-based assays is proving every day that is<br />
well suited for monitoring <strong>of</strong> different pathogens in farm animals 1 .<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> PRRSV different studies have shown that pig oral<br />
fluid (OF) is a suitable sample for monitoring both viremia (PCR)<br />
and sero-conversion (ELISA) after infection 2 . In this study a new<br />
methodology to adapt the existing CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S and<br />
A/S ELISA kits (Hipra) to be used with OF matrix instead <strong>of</strong><br />
serum was evaluated under field conditions. The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to compare the performance <strong>of</strong> the ELISA kits<br />
using individual or pooled serum samples, as well as OF from<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> animals.<br />
PPRS virus, oral fluid, ELISA, alternative for monitoring<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study included a single group <strong>of</strong> 10 gilts coming from a<br />
PRRSV-free farm (as confirmed by PCR and ELISA at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the study). The animals were infected in isolation<br />
using a field strain <strong>of</strong> PRRSV Type 1 on day 0. The study lasted<br />
for 9 weeks (wk) with weekly sampling <strong>of</strong> blood from each<br />
individual and OF samples from the group. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />
antibodies to PRRSV Type 1 and 2 was evaluated by using the<br />
CIVTEST SUIS PRRSV E/S and CIVTEST SUIS PRRS A/S<br />
ELISA kits respectively (Hipra) and also by Western blot based in<br />
a European strain. Individual serum samples were tested for the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> viral RNA by Real Time RT-PCR 3 . Serums samples<br />
were analyzed individually and as a pool <strong>of</strong> 10 (pool/10). For OF<br />
serology different conjugates (anti-IgG1,-IgG2, -IgA) for the<br />
ELISA were evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
The incubation conditions for OF were fixed at 4 ºC <strong>of</strong> a ½<br />
dilution <strong>of</strong> the sample. In all cases an IRPC <strong>of</strong> 20.0 was used as<br />
a cut-<strong>of</strong>f (as defined in CIVTEST for individual serum). As seen in<br />
Table I, results from individual serum showed 80% <strong>of</strong> positive<br />
animals at wk3 (100% at wk4). The IRPC values for the pool/10<br />
and OF samples showed a value above 20 at wk4. Both, the<br />
mean IRPC value <strong>of</strong> the group and the IRPC <strong>of</strong> the pool/10<br />
increased until the end <strong>of</strong> the study. By contrast, IRPC values<br />
obtained for the OF sample showed a maximum at wk4, and then<br />
dropped down till the end <strong>of</strong> the trial. No reactivity was observed<br />
with the A/S kit (data not shown). The use <strong>of</strong> different conjugates<br />
for the analysis <strong>of</strong> OF samples indicated that the most abundant<br />
type <strong>of</strong> Ig after infection was IgA (already detectable at wk1 postinfection;<br />
Figure 1). The kinetics <strong>of</strong> IgG1 showed sero-conversion<br />
around 3-4 weeks after infection. IgG2 levels were nondetectable<br />
(data not shown). The maximum sensitivity (IRPC<br />
above 20 at wk1) was achieved by using a combination <strong>of</strong> IgG1<br />
plus IgA conjugates.<br />
Figure1. OD450 values obtained with the oral fluid weekly<br />
samplings using conjugates with different antibody-type<br />
specificity<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S has shown a good adaptation to the<br />
OF matrix. This sample evidenced antibody dynamics similar to<br />
those observed with the pool/10 serum sample, representing a<br />
suitable alternative for monitoring PRRSV circulation in pig herds.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> different channels (IgG1 or IgA) for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
OF sample would allow to asses maximum earliness in the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> infection or detection <strong>of</strong> the fall in post-infection<br />
immunity.<br />
References<br />
1. Prickett, J.R. et al: 2010, Anim Hlth Res. Rev. 11(2): 207-216.<br />
2. Kittawornrat, A. et al: 2010, Virus Res. Dec;154(1-2):170-176.<br />
3. Martínez, E. et al: 2008, Res. Vet. Sci. 85: 184-193<br />
Table I. Serology results obtained with serum and oral fluid using<br />
the CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S at weekly intervals after infection<br />
(IRPC values above 20.0 appear in shaded boxes)<br />
PRRS E/S<br />
% Pos<br />
(ELISA)<br />
wk<br />
0<br />
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6 wk7 wk8 wk9<br />
0% 0% 0% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100%<br />
Mean (IRPC) -1,49 -1,38 8,64 24,32 41,75 46,56 70,47 50,96 72,67 72,00<br />
Pool/10<br />
(IRPC)<br />
-1,80 -2,09 4,19 11,52 23,95 54,09 57,88 48,48 68,97 87,19<br />
OF (IRPC) -5,20 -4,22 0,13 14,08 46,65 31,48 35,19 29,74 20,52 32,66<br />
OF/IgG1+IgA<br />
(IRPC)<br />
4,33 44,02 60,07 71,66 99,72 96,37 97,72 86,04 80,60 99,95
S1 - O - 12<br />
ENHANCED DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY VIRUSES BY INCLUSION OF COHORT<br />
ANIMALS<br />
Ronan O’Neill, Emily Connaghan, Jean Mooney<br />
CVRL, Virology Division, Backweston, Celbridge, Ireland<br />
Respiratory virus, bovine, multiple, PCR, diagnostics<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in calves remains a hugely<br />
significant problem to Irish cattle breeders. Until recently BRD<br />
diagnostics were quite limited but this has improved due to the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> molecular techniques, the introduction <strong>of</strong> a pooled<br />
swab matrix and a parallel programme <strong>of</strong> veterinary education.<br />
These advances have allowed a much more accurate<br />
representation <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> BRD in terms <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> year<br />
and pathogen involved. This study provides support to the<br />
clinical judgement <strong>of</strong> vets in making an initial pathogen<br />
identification and initiating remedial actions at the earliest<br />
stage.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The analysis is based on data generated over the three year<br />
period <strong>of</strong> 2009 to 2011. The calf age–group dataset consisted<br />
<strong>of</strong> 3822 PCR tests from 753 submissions, representing 30%<br />
(n=12642) and 31% (n=2405) <strong>of</strong> total live animal respiratory<br />
submissions over the period. The sample matrix used<br />
throughout was cotton swabs, without transport media.<br />
Veterinarians were encouraged to collect up to six swabs from<br />
the index and cohort animals which were then pooled in the<br />
lab for testing (same cost) so the analysis includes results<br />
based on individual swabs and results based for pooled<br />
swabs.<br />
The normal respiratory panel consisted <strong>of</strong> five real-time PCR<br />
tests for Bovine Herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) (1), Bovine Coronavirus<br />
(BoCo)(2), Bovine Respiratory Syncytial virus (BRSV)(3),<br />
Bovine Viral Diarrhoea virus (BVDv)(4) and Parainfluenza 3<br />
virus (PI3). All swabs were also assessed for nucleic acid yield<br />
/polymerase inhibition using a B-actin internal control.<br />
Results<br />
In calves overall, BHV1 was detected in 8% <strong>of</strong> swabs tested,<br />
BoCo in 37%, BRSV in 11%, BVDv in 4% and PI3 in 9%.<br />
However respiratory samples in this age group are extremely<br />
seasonal with 46% <strong>of</strong> samples in months November,<br />
December and January (Figure 1). In the calf age group, the<br />
months with the highest rates <strong>of</strong> detection were December for<br />
BRSV (44%) and PI3 (26%), November for BoCo (18%) and<br />
January for BHV1 (15%) and BVDv (15%).<br />
In calves there were 2622 PCR tests done on individual swabs<br />
and 1199 PCR tests done on pooled swabs – sufficient<br />
numbers to allow statistical comparison. On average using<br />
pooled swabs rather than individual swabs increased the virus<br />
detection rate for BHV1 by a factor <strong>of</strong> 2.4 (p
S1 - O - 13<br />
THE FIRST YEAR OF OBLIGATORY BVD CONTROL IN GERMANY – DIAGNOSTIC STRATEGIES,<br />
RESULTS AND EXPERIENCES<br />
Horst Schirrmeier, Günter Strebelow, Martin Beer<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany<br />
Pestivirus, disease controlj<br />
Introduction<br />
Since November 2004, Bovine viral diarrhea/Mucosal disease<br />
(BVD/MD) has been a notifiable disease in Germany. An<br />
obligatory BVD-legislation and control strategy <strong>of</strong> the Federal<br />
Government is active since the 1st <strong>of</strong> January 2011. The<br />
implemented eradication strategy is focused on the direct<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> persistently infected (PI) animals by using antigen<br />
ELISAs or real-time RT-PCR.<br />
References<br />
1. Anonymus (2008). „Verordnung zum Schutz der Rinder vor einer<br />
Infektion mit dem Bovinen Virusdiarrhoe-Virus (BVDV-Verordnung) v.<br />
11.12.2008 (BGBl. I S. 2461), neugefasst durch Bek. v. 4.10.2010 I 1320,<br />
1498,geändert durch Art. 1 V v. 17.12.2010 I 2131, diese geändert durch Art. 1 V<br />
v. 31.5.2011 I 1002<br />
2. Schirrmeier, H. Strebelow, G. (<strong>2012</strong>). BVD-Pflichtbekämpfung – Wie ist<br />
die epidemiologische Situation in Deutschland?, LBH, 6. Leipziger<br />
Tierärztekongress – Tagungsband 3: 95-98<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The major goal <strong>of</strong> the obligatory control program is a fast and<br />
efficient reduction <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> PI animals and the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> so-called “unsuspicious (virus free) animals” and<br />
farms with a certified status. Therefore, four basic rules were<br />
defined:<br />
1. Obligatory investigation <strong>of</strong> all newborn calves for BVDV<br />
(antigen/genome) before the age <strong>of</strong> 6 months<br />
2. Efficient elimination <strong>of</strong> all PI animals.<br />
3. Trade with certified “unsuspicious animals” only<br />
4. Prevention <strong>of</strong> reinfections by qualified measures (e.g.<br />
biosafety and voluntary vaccination)<br />
Approved methods taking the so-called “diagnostic gap”<br />
(method-dependent limitation <strong>of</strong> virus/genome detection due to<br />
BVDV-specific colostral antibodies) into account, and a system <strong>of</strong><br />
measures for quality control and assurance, like pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests<br />
or the licensing <strong>of</strong> diagnostic assays ensure a high standard <strong>of</strong><br />
BVDV diagnostics within the German program. Ear notches are<br />
the main sample material allowing a reliable and very early<br />
detection and subsequent elimination <strong>of</strong> PI animals. All diagnostic<br />
results are <strong>of</strong>ficially documented in a central data base (HIT).<br />
Additionally, in order to get more information about the molecular<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> BVDV in Germany, more than 400 BVDVpositive<br />
samples or virus isolates from PI animals were collected<br />
and further analysed by sequencing their 5’ untranslated genome<br />
region (5´UTR)<br />
Results<br />
In the last year, more than 6 million tests for the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
BVDV were conducted in German laboratories. Real-time RT-<br />
PCR assays and antigen-capture-ELISAs were used in an<br />
approximately equal amount. 17 410 PI animals had been<br />
detected and were removed which is a percentage <strong>of</strong> 0.14% in<br />
relation to the German cattle population, and <strong>of</strong> 0.36% in relation<br />
to all calves born in 2011. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> PI animals differed<br />
between the German federal states from 0.02% to 0.58%. In<br />
6016 cattle holdings at least one PI animal was detected (4.1%).<br />
Phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> 445 German BVDV isolates clearly<br />
showed that only two BVDV subgroups (BVDV-1b and BVDV–1d)<br />
represented more than 75% <strong>of</strong> all strains investigated. Apart from<br />
this dominating subgroups, BVDV-1f (8.8%), BVDV-1e (3.5%),<br />
BVDV-1h (2.9%), BVDV-1g (0.7%), and BVDV-1k (0.2%) could<br />
be observed. Regional differences were also noticeable. The<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> BVDV-2 was 5.1%, and the subtype “Germany 2a”<br />
was the dominating subgroup within this genotype.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
During the first year <strong>of</strong> the German compulsory BVDV control<br />
program, more than 17 000 PI animals were detected and<br />
removed. Furthermore, a reduction <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> notified PI<br />
cases was obvious during the last three month due to an efficient<br />
elimination at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year. We therefore conclude,<br />
that the diagnostic concept, focussed on an as early as possible<br />
detection and elimination <strong>of</strong> PI calves is successful. However,<br />
with the progress in BVDV-eradication, the risk and the economic<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> reinfections have to be taken into consideration, and<br />
accompanying measures like serological monitoring and<br />
vaccination have to be implemented into the complex disease<br />
control system..
S1 - O - 14<br />
EUROPEAN PRRSV – DIAGNOSTIC SOLUTIONS FOR A RAPIDLY MUTATING VIRUS<br />
R. Shah 2 , C. Boss 1 , C. O’Connell 2<br />
1<br />
Life Technologies,Darmstadt, Germany<br />
2<br />
Life Technologies, Austin, USA<br />
Introduction<br />
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV)<br />
is a highly infectious disease that is endemic in pigs throughout<br />
Europe. Estimates on its economic impact vary from as little as<br />
€60 per infected animal to as much as €75 for every animal in<br />
production on an annualized basis. Detection and removal <strong>of</strong><br />
infected animals followed by surveillance to avoid re-infection is<br />
the preferred strategy to manage the impact <strong>of</strong> the disease in<br />
European Pig Populations.<br />
The virus is continuously and rapidly evolving, generating “new<br />
variants” and expanding its diversity. Therefore there is a need to<br />
update diagnostic solutions at a pace that provides efficacious,<br />
appropriate and cost competitive solutions to the marketplace.<br />
In 2010, diagnostic studies showed that a mutation in one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
9 open reading frames <strong>of</strong> the North American PRRS viral<br />
genome had rendered our Taqman NA/EU PRRSV reagents<br />
ineffective for detection <strong>of</strong> certain newly mutated variants.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Laboratories using the Life Technologies Taqman PRRSV assay<br />
sent samples to our lab for sequencing analysis. Several <strong>of</strong> the<br />
questionable samples were sequenced and the resulting<br />
sequence information was used to design a set <strong>of</strong> primers and<br />
probes that were perfect matches to the new sequence. This new<br />
set <strong>of</strong> oligos is refered to as a “patch”.<br />
The new patch was added to the existing assay and optimized so<br />
as to increase sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the North American PRRSV assay<br />
while not affecting sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the European PRRSV assay that<br />
was multiplexed with it.<br />
Results<br />
Over 130 samples from different labs that contained the new<br />
NAPRRSV strain were tested with the patched assay as well as<br />
the old assay to show that the patch really did pick up the new<br />
strain that the old assay was missing. No non specific<br />
interactions were obsereved when the patch was added to the<br />
old assay reagents.<br />
The new patched assay enables sensitive and specific detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> current and old NAPRRSV strains as well as the ability to<br />
subtype EUPRRSV strains from NAPRRSV strains. All<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> the old assay such as thermal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and PCR<br />
mastermix preparation remain the same.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Given the rapid mutation rate <strong>of</strong> PRRSV, the creation and<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> a diagnostic solution is a moving target.<br />
Therefore collaborations across veterinary laboratories and other<br />
key stakeholders is essential for monitoring the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
divergence that is occurring and to aid in building robust<br />
diagnostic solutions.<br />
This North American example provides a template, combined<br />
with newly available technologies such as whole genome<br />
sequencing, for creating a regionally appropriate assay and<br />
monitoring program for the detection <strong>of</strong> rapidly mutating viruses<br />
like PRRSV.<br />
References<br />
Iowa State University, Iowa Select Farms, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />
PRRSV
S1 - O - 15<br />
SEROLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND MONITORING OF IBR<br />
IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONTROL IBRgE ANTIBODIES IN A BULK TANK MILK?<br />
Xavier Rebordosa-Trigueros, Ester Coma Oliva, Santiago Casademunt Garre, Lourdes Porquet-Garanto*<br />
HIPRA, 17170 Amer (Girona), SPAIN<br />
IBRgE, Bulk Tank Milk (BTM), lower prevalence detection.<br />
Introduction<br />
The detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies in Bulk Tank Milk (BTM) provides<br />
an easy and cheap methodology for monitoring the health<br />
status <strong>of</strong> the herd 1 . The application <strong>of</strong> this methodology to the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> IBR-gE antibodies presents some limitations.<br />
Blocking IBRgE-ELISAs have low sensitivity 2 . So, IBRgE-<br />
ELISAs are only capable <strong>of</strong> detecting positive tanks when the<br />
prevalence in the animals in production is greater than 15-<br />
20% 3 . Under these conditions, gE detection in the BTM is not<br />
adequate for monitoring the tank and even less so for the<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> the farms. The objective <strong>of</strong> this work is to<br />
develop and validate an IgG concentration method to increase<br />
the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the IBR-gE detection systems in BTM<br />
sample.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
We have developed a simple methodology that in less than 60<br />
minutes can concentrate up to 30 times the IgGs from a<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> 5.0 ml <strong>of</strong> BTM. To validate this methodology 17<br />
dairy-farms from the NW <strong>of</strong> Spain with a known IBR status<br />
were selected (8 vaccinated and 9 non-vaccinated). From<br />
each farm we have obtained Individual serum <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
animals in production and a sample <strong>of</strong> each tank. Taking into<br />
account the IBRgE results in sera the real prevalence <strong>of</strong> each<br />
tank was calculated. BTM samples were also analysed for gE<br />
pure and concentrated.<br />
Results<br />
The actual prevalence against gE, calculated from individual<br />
serum samples in the 17 selected farms was: 0% (5 farms),<br />
4%, 15%, 17%, 18% 19%, 21%, 24%, 26%, 33%, 43% and<br />
44% (2 farms). By using pure milk (non-concentrated) only 5<br />
tanks were consistently detected as positives to gE. These<br />
tanks corresponded to the farms with the higher prevalence<br />
values (from 26% to 44%). By contrast, applying to the same<br />
samples the methodology <strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> IgGs, all tanks<br />
were detected positive, even the lowest prevalence one. This<br />
methodology did not affect the 5 negative tanks that remained<br />
negative. Fig. 1.<br />
Figure 1. BTM ELISA IBRgE titres from 17 dairy-farms.<br />
Prevalence detection from 0 to 44%. Column □ nonconcentrated<br />
BTM (pure milk) and Column ■ salting-out<br />
concentrated BTM (IgGs concentration). CIVTEST ®<br />
BOVIS<br />
IBRgE interpretation: Higher than 20.0 (%INH) = positive<br />
sample, Lower than or equal to 20.0 = negative sample.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
These results indicate that the proposed IgG concentration<br />
system does not affect the specificity <strong>of</strong> the ELISA but<br />
increases the sensitivity, having allowed in this study to detect<br />
tanks with the lower prevalence (4%).<br />
References<br />
1.Nylin, B., Strøger, U., Rønsholt, L. “A retrospective<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Bovine Herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) antibody ELISA<br />
on bulk-tank milk samples for classification <strong>of</strong> the BHV-1<br />
status <strong>of</strong> Danish dairy herds”. (2000). Preventive Veterinary<br />
Medicine. 47, 91-105.<br />
2. Kramps, J.A., Banks, M., Beer, M., Kerkh<strong>of</strong>s, P., Perrin, M.,<br />
Wellenberg, G.J. and Van Oirschot, J.T. (2004) “Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
tests for antibodies against bovine herpesvirus 1 performed in<br />
national reference laboratories in Europe”. Vet Microbiol.,<br />
8;102(3-4):169-81.<br />
3. Wellenberg, G.J., Verstraten, E.R.A.M., Mars, M.H., Van<br />
Oirschot, J.T. (1998) “ELISA detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies to<br />
glycoprotein E <strong>of</strong> bovine herpesvirus 1 in bulk milk samples”.<br />
Vet Rec. 142(9), 219 – 20.
S1 - O - 16<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR ZEN GEL MIX FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND<br />
QUANTIFICATION OF COXIELLA BURNETII<br />
Aleida Villa 1 , José L Arnal 1 , Daniel Serrano 1 , Alfredo A Benito 1 , Rafael Baselga 1 .<br />
EXOPOL Autovacunas y Diagnóstico. Pol. Río Gállego, 50840 San Mateo de Gállego Zaragoza, España. Tel 976 69 45 25, exopol@exopol.com<br />
Coxiella burnetii, qPCR, validation, diagnostics<br />
Introduction<br />
Coxiella burnetii is the ethological agent <strong>of</strong> Q Fever a zoonotic<br />
and emergent disease with implications for public and animal<br />
health. Reliable diagnosis <strong>of</strong> C. burnetii is the vertebral point for<br />
the control <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> these bacteria highly infectious.<br />
Here we describe a novel PCR (qPCR) assay simple, rapid,<br />
sensitive, specific, robust and well validated for routine diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Coxiella burnetii based in a new type <strong>of</strong> "ZEN" double<br />
quencher probe (1) that increases the accuracy, sensitivity and<br />
significantly decreases the background fluorescence, reducing<br />
Cq values consistently with a greater precision and signal. In this<br />
qPCR all the reaction components (master mix, enzymes,<br />
specific primers, probes, buffer and internal controls) have been<br />
stabilized within a plate using a technology called gelation (2)<br />
allowing their use at room temperature and in a "ready to use”<br />
format.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
To ensure high performance and bio-safety on the DNA process<br />
extraction, the procedure was performed in an automated Lab<br />
Turbo robot (Taigen, Bioscience, Taiwan) and compared to an<br />
established manual DNA extraction method (Mo Bio). The<br />
samples were run .through the kits according to the<br />
manufactures` instructions. The qPCR set up protocol were<br />
single consisting <strong>of</strong> RNAse/ DNAse free water and 5µl <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />
sample Amplification reactions were carried out on a MiniOpticon<br />
RT System CFB3120 thermal cycler (Bio Rad, s<strong>of</strong>tware CFX<br />
manager 2.0). The assay targets a C. burnetii specie specific<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the Trans gene was selected, the internal probe trans-p<br />
was labeled with (FAM/ZEN/Iowa Black). The capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ZEN Coxiella burnetii Gel Mix to discriminate between target and<br />
non target microorganisms was assessed using 1ng/µl <strong>of</strong><br />
genomic DNA from various sources: including 4 reference strain<br />
and 73 field strain and 1407 clinical cases; from sheep, goat and<br />
bovine origin: (milk, feces, vaginal exudates, tissue from<br />
abortions and parturient cows, water and other environmental<br />
samples) and 40 strains <strong>of</strong> entities prevalent in ruminants. The<br />
positives samples obtained by qPCR were used for C. burnetii<br />
isolation in VERO cell line. The obtained strains were identified<br />
by immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence and quantified by qPCR, and then<br />
confirmed by inoculation in chick embryo yolk sac and genotyping<br />
in the reference center <strong>of</strong> Coxiella <strong>of</strong> Institute Carlos III in Madrid.<br />
The parameters <strong>of</strong> analytical and diagnostic sensitivity; analytical<br />
and diagnostic specificity; precision intra-assay and inter-assay<br />
were evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
ZEN qPCR Coxiella Gel mix demonstrated an excellent ability to<br />
quantify, defined by its wide dynamic range (at least 7 log units),<br />
with a minimum detection limit equivalents to 2 genome copies <strong>of</strong><br />
C. burnetii and a maximum value <strong>of</strong> > 10 10 . The slopes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
linear regression curves were calculated within an interval <strong>of</strong> 7-<br />
log dilutions and were similar to the theoretical optimum <strong>of</strong> -3.32<br />
(-3.475), showing an effective amplification efficiency (E = 0.90),<br />
and R 2 values close to 1 (0.9988) indicating that the assay was<br />
extremely linear. Confidence intervals based on the standard<br />
deviations <strong>of</strong> the Cq values not overlapped, up to 10 target<br />
molecules, indicating that it is possible a reliable quantification<br />
above this limit. The intra-assay CVs (5 replicates and 5 assays)<br />
ranged between 9.8% and 31%. The inter-assay CVs obtained<br />
was from 12.6% to 24.5% after 5 independent trials. The<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the real-time quantitative PCR was 2, 6 times higher<br />
than that isolation in VERO cell line. All isolates (73/194) were<br />
phase I and highly pathogenic in chick embryos<br />
Table 1. qPCR positive tissue from abortions Vs Isolation <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
burnetii<br />
Species Positive<br />
qPCR cases<br />
C. burnetii<br />
isolates cases<br />
% <strong>of</strong> isolation Vs<br />
qPCR positive cases<br />
Bovine 70 41 58,6<br />
Caprine 31 10 32,3<br />
Ovine 93 22 23,7<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> specificity detection <strong>of</strong> 40 species <strong>of</strong> other common<br />
pathogens agents proved to be negative. The positive rates <strong>of</strong><br />
Coxiella burnetii shedding in abortions were 27.21% (123/452),<br />
while in post partum cases was very low 5.99% (22/345). The<br />
excretions <strong>of</strong> C. burnetii in ruminants herds in productions<br />
resulted: vaginal swabs 26.81% (74/276); milk tanks 31.58%<br />
(12/38); pooled milks 22.22% (40/180); bovine feces 2.17(2/90).<br />
C. burnetii was also detected in ground samples 33.3% (1/3), but<br />
not on in water (0/10) and cereal (0/3) samples.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
Abortions and/or birth <strong>of</strong> weak <strong>of</strong>fspring are the most serious<br />
consequence by C. burnetii infection in animals. Abortions<br />
usually occur in the second half <strong>of</strong> gestation (3) . Infected animals<br />
are usually asymptomatic and is not possible establish any<br />
relationship between antibody titers and individuals excretion.<br />
Studies by Rousset et al. (4)<br />
showed that a non negligible<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> seronegative animals in delivered normally could<br />
excrete C. burnetii to remain seronegative and spread massive<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> microorganisms during calving. C. burnetii was<br />
detected in 26.42% <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> abortions and 61.98% <strong>of</strong> these<br />
viable bacteria were recovered in phase I with high pathogenicity<br />
and 11.36% <strong>of</strong> them were characterized to belong to genotype III,<br />
where are included strain from animals, ticks and those that<br />
cause acute Q fever in humans. These data shows that Coxiella<br />
infection in rumiants animals have a strong impact on<br />
environmental contamination and its a potential dangerous<br />
source for humans infection, even if people have or not contact<br />
with infected animals. The high number <strong>of</strong> Coxiella positive cases<br />
found in this study claim the need for stablish strict health and<br />
vaccination programs.The qPCR developed and validated for us<br />
and used in this studies has proved a wonderful diagnostic tool<br />
and is available commercially.<br />
References<br />
1.- CORALVILLE, IA. ZEN double-quenched probes can now be<br />
combined with a range <strong>of</strong> fluorescent dyes in: www.idtdna.com<br />
2.- Biotools. Método de estabilización de Biomoléculas y mezclas<br />
de reacción complejas mediante la gelificación Patentes<br />
Internacionales PCT ES2002/000109 PCT ES2004/000024.<br />
3. Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. Enfermedad infecciosa<br />
de los ovinos. S.S.Diab and Uzal F.A. 2007. Disponible en:<br />
www.produccion-animal.com.ar<br />
4. Rousset E, Berri M, Durand B, Dufour P, Prigent M, Delcroix T,<br />
et al. A. Coxiella burnetii shedding routes and antibody response<br />
after Q fever abortion outbreaks in dairy goat herds.Appl Environ<br />
Microbiol. 2008, Nov 14.<br />
5. Guatteo R, Beaudeau F, Joly A and Seegers H. Coxiella<br />
burnetii shedding by dairy cows. Vet Res 2007 Nov-Dec;<br />
38(6):849-60.
S1 - O - 17<br />
RING TEST EVALUATION FOR THE DETECTION OF PRRSV ANTIBODIES IN ORAL FLUID<br />
SPECIMENS USING A COMMERCIAL PRRSV SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA<br />
Apisit Kittawornrat 1 , Chong Wang 1 , Gary Anderson 2 , Andrea Ballagi 3 , Andre Broes 4 , Susy Carman 5 , Kent<br />
Doolittle 6 , Judith Galeota 7 , John Johnson 1 , Sergio Lizano 3 , Eric Nelson 8 , Devi Patnayak 9 , Roman Pogranichniy 10 ,<br />
Anna Rice 3 , Gail Scherba 11 , Jeffrey Zimmerman 1<br />
1 Iowa State University, 2 Kansas State University, 3 IDEXX Laboratories,Inc., 4 Biovet Inc., 5 University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, 6 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.,<br />
7 University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska, 8 South Dakota State University, 9 University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, 10 Purdue University, 11 University <strong>of</strong> Illinois<br />
Oral fluid, ELISA, Ring test, PRRSV<br />
Introduction<br />
A commercial PRRS serum antibody ELISA (IDEXX<br />
Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook ME USA) was recently adapted to<br />
detect anti-PRRSV antibody in oral fluid specimens (1). Based on<br />
testing <strong>of</strong> field and experimental samples, diagnostic sensitivity<br />
and specificity was estimated at 94.7% (95% CI: 92.4, 96.5) and<br />
100% (95% CI: 99.0, 100.0), respectively, at a sample-to-positive<br />
(S/P) cut<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> ≥ 0.40. 1 The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate<br />
the reproducibility and repeatability <strong>of</strong> the PRRS oral fluid ELISA<br />
in a ring test (check test) format.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 276 oral fluid samples were collected, completely<br />
randomized, and sent for testing in 12 collaborating diagnostic<br />
laboratories. In addition to the set <strong>of</strong> oral fluid samples, each<br />
laboratory received the materials required for conducting the test:<br />
ELISA plates (HerdChek® PRRS X3 ELISA, lot #40959-W721),<br />
reagents, positive and negative controls, pre-diluted conjugate<br />
antibody, and a copy <strong>of</strong> the standard operating procedure for the<br />
PRRS oral fluid IgG ELISA. The laboratories tested the samples<br />
and returned the results for analysis. Assay results were<br />
analyzed as S/P ratios, with S/P ratios ≥ 0.40 considered<br />
positive.<br />
Results<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> the results from the 12 laboratories is summarized<br />
in Figure 1. As is shown in Figure 1, variation in S/P results<br />
increased as the concentration <strong>of</strong> antibody in the sample<br />
increased. Overall, this had little impact on categorical results.<br />
That is, among the 276 samples tested by the 12 laboratories,<br />
133 samples tested positive in all laboratories; 136 samples<br />
tested negative in all laboratories, and 7 samples had discordant<br />
results (Table 1). With the exception <strong>of</strong> sample #7, a discordant<br />
result was reported in each case by only one <strong>of</strong> the 12<br />
laboratories. Discordant results for sample #7 were reported at 3<br />
laboratories, but this may be explained by the fact that all results<br />
for sample #7 clustered close to the 0.40 cut<strong>of</strong>f.<br />
Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> discordant results<br />
Laboratory<br />
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
1 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.51 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.02<br />
2 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.01<br />
3 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.01 3.03 0.02 0.02 0.00<br />
4 1.19 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.04<br />
5 0.07 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.96 0.00 0.02<br />
6 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.04 1.21<br />
7 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.39 0.45 0.27 0.33 0.41 0.40 0.26 0.26 0.25<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The ring test results showed that the PRRS oral fluid IgG ELISA<br />
was highly reproducible across laboratories. These results<br />
support the routine use <strong>of</strong> this test in laboratories providing<br />
diagnostic service to pig producers. Thus, herd monitoring based<br />
on oral fluid sampling could be one part <strong>of</strong> a PRRSV control<br />
and/or elimination program. Further, the successful adaptation <strong>of</strong><br />
one assay to the oral fluid matrix suggests that this approach<br />
could provide the basis for monitoring specific health and welfare<br />
indicators in commercial swine herds using a "pig friendly"<br />
approach.<br />
References<br />
1. Kittawornrat, A et al.: <strong>2012</strong>. Detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV antibodies in oral fluid<br />
specimens using a commercial PRRSV serum antibody ELISA. J Vet<br />
Diagn Invest 24 (2):262-263<br />
Figure 1: PRRS oral fluid antibody ELISA results from 237<br />
samples tested in 12 laboratories
S1 - O - 18<br />
REAL TIME PCR, MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM, MYCOPLASMA SYNOVIAE, MYCOPLASMA<br />
MELEAGRIDIS<br />
Pablo Lopez 1 , Phyllls I. Tyrrell 2<br />
1<br />
IDEXX Laboratories, Livestock and Poultry Diagnostics, Westbrook, Maine, USA<br />
2<br />
IDEXX Laboratories, Research and Development, Westbrook, Maine, USA<br />
Introduction<br />
Pathogenic Mycoplasma species are widely prevalent, and<br />
detrimental to poultry health and production. The pathogenic<br />
Mycoplasma species for poultry include M. gallisepticum (Mg), M.<br />
synoviae (Ms) and M. meleagridis (Mm). Infection with these<br />
pathogens can lead to airsaccultis, synovitis, respiratory disease,<br />
decreased growth and decreased egg production (3). Detection<br />
has historically been via Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Serum<br />
Plate Agglutination (SPA) and Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent<br />
Assay (ELISA), with culture isolation as the gold standard <strong>of</strong><br />
testing. The use <strong>of</strong> Real-time PCR for the detection <strong>of</strong> pathogenic<br />
mycoplasmas has emerged as a rapid and highly accurate<br />
technique for the recognition or confirmation <strong>of</strong> common<br />
Mycoplasma species in a flock. The reagent sets use<br />
hybridization probes to allow for the creation <strong>of</strong> melting curves<br />
that provide another level <strong>of</strong> diagnostic sensitivity and confidence<br />
in test results.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
All samples were run according to reagent set instructions, using<br />
IDEXX Mg Detection Reagents (lot #1058), Ms Detection<br />
Reagents (lot #1060) or Mm Detection Reagents (lot #1062).<br />
Briefly, reactions consisted <strong>of</strong> 4 μL Roche Genotyping Master<br />
Mix, 9 μL nuclease-free PCR grade water, 2 uL <strong>of</strong> species -<br />
specific detection reagent and 5 μL DNA extraction sample.<br />
Cycling conditions were as follows:<br />
Activation: 95°C, 10 minutes, 1 cycle<br />
Amplification (45 cycles): 95°C, 20 seconds<br />
60°C, 20 seconds, single acquisitions<br />
73°C, 15 seconds<br />
Melting Curve: 95°C, 1 minute<br />
45°C, 1 minute<br />
80°C, 0.14°C/second ramp rate, continuous acquisitions<br />
All samples were tested on a Roche LC 480 LightCycler at either<br />
IDEXX Laboratories or field sites, using 96-well reaction plates<br />
with optical film covers.<br />
Results<br />
M. gallisepticum M. synoviae M. meleagridis<br />
Sample DNA Crossing T m Crossing T m Crossing T m<br />
Point Point Point<br />
M. iowae negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. lip<strong>of</strong>aciens negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. cloacale negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. imitans negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. gallisnarum negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. gallinaceum negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. glycophilum negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. pullorum negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
M. gallopavonis negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
10 fg 28.58 63.99 28.92 68.48 28.71 71.48<br />
1 fg 31.70 63.64 32.22 67.92 32.84 71.42<br />
nc negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
nc negative negative negative negative negative negative<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> hybridization probe technology allows for the<br />
simultaneous generation <strong>of</strong> crossing point data as well as melting<br />
curve analysis to confirm positive results. While ELISA<br />
technology remains the current standard in screening assays for<br />
avian mycoplasmas, we hope that these standardized reagent<br />
sets will improve testing confidence and be incorporated into<br />
laboratory protocols.
Oral presentations<br />
“Diagnostics<br />
at the point <strong>of</strong> interest”<br />
(2 nd session)
S2 - K - 01<br />
WHEN DO YOU WANT THE RESULT? HOW MUCH DO YOU WANT TO PAY!<br />
Andrew Soldan<br />
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, AHVLA Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> some tests are not time critical. For<br />
surveillance testing <strong>of</strong> healthy populations to confirm the absence<br />
<strong>of</strong> disease the cost <strong>of</strong> testing and the ability to handle large<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> tests is likely to be more important than the speed to<br />
result. In many other circumstances a result the day after<br />
sampling is perfectly adequate. However there are situations<br />
when a same day result or even a next to patient result would be<br />
advantageous. In general these tests can justify a higher unit kit<br />
cost. This paper explores the relationship between cost,<br />
convenience and speed to result <strong>of</strong> tests for infectious disease in<br />
animals. It considers what an ideal rapid patient side test would<br />
look like.<br />
In human medicine very large sums are being invested to<br />
develop point to care testing, especially for molecular agent<br />
detection. However point <strong>of</strong> care testing in humans is not the<br />
equivalent <strong>of</strong> pen-side testing for animals. It is likely that a spin<br />
<strong>of</strong>f from the investment in human diagnostics will be significant<br />
improvements in near patient animal testing. This will be done in<br />
practice labs, labs set up close to a disease outbreak and in<br />
regional rather than central labs. The new tests will be rapid,<br />
accurate, and need little skill or training to run. For veterinary<br />
applications it is likely that platforms with lower instrument costs<br />
will find greater acceptance. An issue that both veterinary<br />
practitioners and regulators will need to address is that owners<br />
will be able to buy and run many <strong>of</strong> these tests themselves.<br />
This paper discusses the major categories <strong>of</strong> rapid tests for<br />
serology and agent detection including consideration <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />
the commercial technologies that are just coming to market.<br />
Rapid tests, point <strong>of</strong> care testing, pen-side testing, cost, speed
S2 - O - 01<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A RAPID ISOTHERMAL ASSAY TO DETECT TAYLORELLA EQUIGENITALIS, THE<br />
CAUSATIVE AGENT OF CONTAGIOUS EQUINE METRITIS.<br />
S. E. North, P. Das, P.R. Wakeley, J. Sawyer<br />
Technology Transfer Unit, Specialist Scientific Support Department, Animal Health Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, United Kingdom.<br />
Introduction<br />
Contagious Equine Metritis (CEM) is an infection <strong>of</strong> the equine<br />
genital tract, caused by the bacterium Taylorella equigenitalis.<br />
Identifying T. equigenitalis from equine genital swabs, and<br />
differentiating it from the closely related Taylorella asinigenitalis,<br />
using a standard bacteriological culture methodology is laborious,<br />
slow and relies on the presence <strong>of</strong> live bacteria. We have<br />
developed a rapid isothermal assay for the detection <strong>of</strong> T.<br />
equigenitalis, the causative agent <strong>of</strong> CEM, using Recombinase<br />
Polymerase Amplification (RPA). RPA is a method <strong>of</strong> amplifying<br />
DNA or RNA. Like the conventional PCR method <strong>of</strong> amplifying<br />
nucleic acid, RPA employs the use <strong>of</strong> two primers and a probe,<br />
however, the reaction proceeds at a single temperature (37C)<br />
and does not cycle through various temperatures as PCR does.<br />
The reactions can be monitored in real time, based on<br />
fluorescence readings, or the products <strong>of</strong> amplification can be<br />
detected at the endpoint <strong>of</strong> the reaction on a lateral flow device<br />
(LFD).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Equine genital swabs were used to inoculate culture medium<br />
before a crude DNA extraction was performed, enabling<br />
comparisons to be made with conventional culture methods. The<br />
assay was tested, in real time, against 60 equine genital swabs<br />
(30 positive and 30 negative, as determined by culture). To<br />
determine the analytical specificity <strong>of</strong> the assay it was tested<br />
against a panel <strong>of</strong> 38 bacterial species, including closely related<br />
species and equine commensals. The analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assay was calculated using a dilution series <strong>of</strong> target DNA which<br />
was tested in triplicate. A second probe was introduced, specific<br />
for T. asinigenitalis, which enabled detection and differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
both T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis. The T. equigenitalis<br />
assay was adapted, by use <strong>of</strong> a labelled probe, to enable<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> amplification products using a LFD.<br />
Results<br />
The assay to identify T. equigenitalis amplified a 121bp fragment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 23S rDNA genes. A crude DNA preparation <strong>of</strong> a control<br />
strain <strong>of</strong> T. equigenitalis could be consistently detected in five<br />
minutes and the assay will detect as few as 46 gene copies in 12<br />
minutes. The assay did not cross-hybridise with any <strong>of</strong> the 38<br />
different bacterial organisms tested to determine specificity,<br />
including closely related species and known equine commensal<br />
bacteria. Fifty-seven <strong>of</strong> the 60 DNA extracts from genital swabs<br />
were correctly identified. The introduction <strong>of</strong> a second probe into<br />
the assay enabled the simultaneous detection and differentiation<br />
between T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis. The T.<br />
equigenitalis assay was successfully adapted to enable detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> amplification products using a LFD.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
We have successfully developed a rapid and sensitive isothermal<br />
assay to identify T. equigenitalis. Additionally, the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a<br />
second probe enables the detection <strong>of</strong> T. asinigenitalis. The<br />
amplification products can be detected in real time or via LFD.<br />
This test provides a fast (under 15 minutes) and accurate means<br />
<strong>of</strong> identification. The low energy requirements, lack <strong>of</strong> expensive<br />
equipment, freeze dried reagents and LFD readout makes this<br />
test a suitable candidate for rapid diagnosis and treatment in low<br />
technology laboratories or near to the point <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
Isothermal, amplification, equine, metritis, RPA
S2 - O - 02<br />
LABORATORY VALIDATION OF AN IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST FOR THE RAPID<br />
DETECTION OF KOI HERPESVIRUS (CyHV-3) IN GILL SWABS<br />
R. Vrancken 1 , N. Goris 1 , T. Leclipteux 2 , F. Lieffrig 3 , S. Wera 1 , J. Neyts 1 and A. Vanderplasschen 4<br />
1 Okapi Sciences NV, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium<br />
2 Coris BioConcept, R&D Department, B-5032 Gembloux, Belgium<br />
3 CER Groupe, B-6900 Marloie, Belgium<br />
4 University <strong>of</strong> Liège, Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (B43b), B-4000 Liège, Belgium<br />
Immunochromatographic test, Koi herpesvirus, Cyprinid herpesvirus-3<br />
Introduction<br />
Carp are one <strong>of</strong> the most economically valuable fresh-water fish<br />
in aquaculture. Although the majority <strong>of</strong> this species is cultivated<br />
for human consumption (Cypinus carpio carpio), the more<br />
colourful variant <strong>of</strong> this species, the koi carp (Cyprinus carpio<br />
koi), is a popular ornamental fish and may be highly valuable.<br />
In the late 1990’s, both common carp and koi carp were struck<br />
with mass mortality, caused by Cyprinid herpesvirus-3 (CyHV-3)<br />
(1), commonly known as Koi herpesvirus (KHV). Koi herpesvirus<br />
disease (KHVD) is generally seasonal and may develop rapidly at<br />
water temperatures between 23 and 25°C inducing mortality up<br />
to 100% (2). Although clinical signs can be obvious, they are not<br />
pathognomonic, therefore diagnosis <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 relies exclusively<br />
on laboratory techniques like (q)PCR, virus isolation,… Since<br />
early detection <strong>of</strong> KHVD is crucial for disease control, we<br />
developed an immunochromatographic test for the specific and<br />
rapid (pond-side) detection <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 antigen.<br />
In this study we evaluated the analytical and diagnostic specificity<br />
and sensitivity under laboratory conditions.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Rapid test. Briefly, samples were collected by taking a swab from<br />
the gills <strong>of</strong> the animal, which was eluted in 200µl <strong>of</strong> elution buffer.<br />
One hundred µl <strong>of</strong> eluate was subsequently applied to the test<br />
well <strong>of</strong> the test cassette and results were read after 15 minutes.<br />
Analytical specificity. Possible cross-reaction with other<br />
pathogens affecting carp was evaluated on diseased fish for:<br />
Ichthyobodo sp., Dactylogyrus sp. and Gyrodactylus sp.,<br />
Ichthyophthirius sp., Trichodina sp., Aeromonas sp., Saprolegnia<br />
sp., Branchiomyces sp., For Carp Pox virus (CyHV-1) and Spring<br />
Viremia <strong>of</strong> Carp virus (SVCV) in vitro cultured virus was used.<br />
Analytical sensitivity. Serial dilutions <strong>of</strong> in vitro cultured CyHV-3<br />
from different geographical regions were used. These included a<br />
German, an Israeli and two Belgian CyHV-3 field isolates.<br />
Diagnostic specificity. Animals (n=60) known to be free <strong>of</strong> CyHV-<br />
3 were tested using the rapid test as described.<br />
Diagnostic sensitivity. Two identical animal experiments were set<br />
up using either the Belgian field strain M1 or M3. Hereto, 120<br />
common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) were distributed over 4<br />
tanks. Three tanks containing 30 animals were infected by bath<br />
infection for 1 h at 40 pfu/ml <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3. One tank <strong>of</strong> 30 animals<br />
served as a negative control. Each day, 2 animals per tank were<br />
sacrificed and tested using the rapid test. All animals found dead<br />
were analysed as well. DNA <strong>of</strong> gill tissue was extracted and the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 was evaluated by PCR (Bercovier TK<br />
primers) (2).<br />
Results<br />
Analytical specificity. No cross-reactivity was observed. Hence,<br />
the analytical specificity was 100%.<br />
Analytical sensitivity. All field strains were detected with the rapid<br />
test with a limit <strong>of</strong> detection from 1,25 x 10² to 2,4 x 10 4 pfu/ml.<br />
Diagnostic specificity. No false positive results were observed.<br />
Hence, the diagnostic specificity was 100%.<br />
Diagnostic sensitivity.<br />
Experiment 1: CyHV-3 M1<br />
The rapid test detected the viral antigen from day 5 post infection<br />
(p.i.) at a detection rate <strong>of</strong> 33.3% increasing to 100% on day 9 p.i.<br />
The detection rate subsequently decreased until the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
observation period (16 days p.i.) (see Figure 1). All animals found<br />
dead due to KHVD tested positive on the rapid test. Mortality<br />
started at 7 days p.i. and a relative diagnostic sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 52.6%<br />
was estimated when using PCR as golden standard.<br />
Figure 1. Detection rate in fish infected with CyHV-3-M1.<br />
Experiment 2: CyHV-3 M3<br />
The rapid test detected the viral antigen from day 4 p.i. at a<br />
detection rate <strong>of</strong> 33.3%, rapidly increasing to 100% on day 7 p.i.<br />
(see Figure 2). All animals found dead due to KHVD tested<br />
positive on the rapid test. Mortality was observed from 5 days p.i.<br />
and a relative diagnostic sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 71.7% was estimated when<br />
using PCR as golden standard.<br />
Figure 2. Detection rate in fish infected with CyHV-3 M3.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
We here present the first rapid immunochromatographic test for<br />
the specific detection <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3-antigen. This non-invasive test<br />
was able to detect the CyHV-3 antigen in a population (aquarium<br />
or pond) on day 4 or 5 post infection and confirmed the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 in fish that succumbed to the disease (100% detection<br />
rate). Although the diagnostic sensitivity <strong>of</strong> this technique is<br />
inferior to PCR, this method does have some major advantages<br />
over PCR and other laboratory techniques.<br />
The rapid detection <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 is crucial in preventing the further<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> the disease. With this pond-side test, results are<br />
available within 15 minutes and carp breeders/koi owners would<br />
have the opportunity to take the necessary control measures.<br />
This test does not require trained personnel or expensive<br />
equipment and samples do not have to be shipped to<br />
laboratories, thereby saving time. Furthermore, a suspicion <strong>of</strong><br />
KHVD is generally raised in case <strong>of</strong> mortality and given the 100%<br />
sensitivity in fish succumbed to KHVD, the detection <strong>of</strong> an<br />
emerging infection in the field is highly likely, which makes this<br />
test fit for purpose.<br />
In conclusion, we developed the first pond-side test based on<br />
immunochromatography for the specific detection <strong>of</strong> CyHV-3 as a<br />
first line diagnostic tool in the field.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
This study was financed by a project <strong>of</strong> the Walloon Region (APE<br />
grant MA-13387-00).<br />
References<br />
1. Michel, B., Fournier, G., Lieffrig, F., Costes, B., Vanderplasschen, A.<br />
(2010). Emerging infectious diseases, 16, 1835-43.<br />
2. Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals (OIE, 2009)
S2 - O - 03<br />
EVALUATION OF RAPID HRSV STRIP TESTS FOR DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY<br />
SYNCYTIAL VIRUS<br />
Wojciech Socha, Jerzy Rola<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) is one <strong>of</strong> the major viral<br />
pathogens responsible for respiratory tract diseases in cattle<br />
worldwide. Currently most widely used diagnostic methods for<br />
direct detection <strong>of</strong> BRSV are virus isolation test, antigen ELISA<br />
and RT-PCR (1). Each <strong>of</strong> them is relatively complicated and<br />
requires properly equipped laboratory and trained personnel.<br />
Therefore there is a need for a simple and rapid diagnostic test<br />
for detection <strong>of</strong> BRSV in the field conditions. Rapid<br />
immunochromatographic strip tests detecting viral antigens have<br />
been developed for closely related to BRSV, Human Respiratory<br />
Syncytial Virus (HRSV) (2). Due to the high antigenic similarities<br />
between both viruses it could be theoretically possible to adapt<br />
this tests for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> BRSV. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />
evaluate this possibility on animals inoculated with BRSV vaccine<br />
strain.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Five clinically healthy and serologically negative for BRSV calves<br />
approximately 6-8 weeks old were selected for experiment. Three<br />
calves were inoculated intranasally with 2 ml <strong>of</strong> live vaccine<br />
Rispoval RS-PI3 (Pfizer). Control calves received 2 ml <strong>of</strong> sterile<br />
water. Both groups <strong>of</strong> calves were housed separately in isolation<br />
to prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> the vaccine virus. Nasal swabs were<br />
taken both from the inoculated and control calves from day -1 to<br />
28 post inoculation (dpi) and placed in liquid transport medium. In<br />
the laboratory swabs were shaken, centrifuged and the<br />
supernatant was stored at -80 o C until examination.<br />
Three different rapid HRSV strip tests: RSV Respi-strip (Coris),<br />
TRU RSV (Meridian Bioscience) and BinaxNOW RSV (Inverness<br />
Medical) were evaluated in the study. All the tests were<br />
performed according to manufacturer’s instructions.<br />
The detection limit <strong>of</strong> all tests was determined by analysing<br />
a 2-fold dilution series <strong>of</strong> BT cell cultures infected with BRSV<br />
strain 375, with each <strong>of</strong> the strip tests and RT-PCR. Specificity <strong>of</strong><br />
the tests was investigated using two positive reference strains<br />
(BRSV 375, BRSV A51908) and two strains <strong>of</strong> other<br />
paramyxoviruses as a negative control (HRSV A2, BPIV3 SB).<br />
Another negative control consisting <strong>of</strong> transport medium from<br />
UTM-RT Copan system was included.<br />
Total RNA was extracted from the supernatant <strong>of</strong> nasal swabs<br />
using TRI reagent (Sigma) according to the producer’s<br />
instructions. RT-PCR was performed using Titan One-Tube RT-<br />
PCR System (Roche) with primers B7 and B8 specific to gene<br />
encoding glycoprotein G (4). The RT-PCR assay was used as the<br />
gold standard for this study and samples positive by this method<br />
were considered true positives.<br />
Results<br />
The RT-PCR with primers for glycoprotein G gene was specific<br />
for BRSV. None <strong>of</strong> the negative control strains was detected. All<br />
rapid strip tests reacted positively both with HRSV strain A2 and<br />
BRSV reference strains and negatively with BPIV-3. The<br />
detection limit for RT-PCR was 39.1 TCID 50 whereas for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rapid tests it was around 156 TCID 50 <strong>of</strong> the virus .<br />
All three calves vaccinated with the live vaccine Rispoval RS-PI3<br />
were PCR positive on nasal swabs. In total the vaccine virus was<br />
found in 12 swabs out <strong>of</strong> 30 swabs collected from calves<br />
experimentally vaccinated. Two control calves remained negative<br />
in PCR throughout the study. Using RSV Respi-strip test virus was<br />
detected in 7 swabs, four nasal swabs were positive in TRU RSV<br />
test and 9 in BinaxNOW RSV. All <strong>of</strong> tests showed negative results for<br />
control calves. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive<br />
value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated<br />
for each <strong>of</strong> the tests (Table 1)<br />
Table 1. Performance <strong>of</strong> rapid strip tests for BRSV detection.<br />
Test<br />
RSV Respistrip<br />
Diagnostic<br />
sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV<br />
33% 87% 57% 71%<br />
TRU RSV Test 33% 100% 100% 74%<br />
BinaxNOW<br />
RSV<br />
50% 87% 67% 77%<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> our studies confirmed that rapid<br />
immunochromatographic HRSV tests are able to detected BRSV.<br />
They also showed high specificity reacting only with HRSV and<br />
BRSV strains. Positive reaction with HRSV, should not be a<br />
problem because it is known that this virus has highly restricted<br />
host range and does not have the ability to infect cattle (3).<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the strip tests used in this study were previously evaluated<br />
in HRSV diagnostics, showing high specificity (97- 98%) with<br />
sensitivity ranging from 58 to 91%. In our study we made similar<br />
calculations for the same three strip tests for their performance in<br />
BRSV detection. Compared with RT-PCR, specificity <strong>of</strong> strip tests<br />
was relatively high (87-100%) however their diagnostic sensitivity<br />
was low (33-50%). This showed that although strip tests reacted<br />
with similarly high specificity with both BRSV and HRSV, their<br />
sensitivity was clearly affected when used in detection <strong>of</strong> bovine<br />
pathogen. This could be explained by existing differences in<br />
amino acid sequence <strong>of</strong> F and N proteins between BRSV and<br />
HRSV, which can be reason for overall weaker reaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assays.<br />
It is also possible that lower diagnostic sensitivity detected in our<br />
study stemed from different type <strong>of</strong> samples used for testing.<br />
Nasopharygneal washes are described as a recommended<br />
specimen for immunchromatographic tests and previous<br />
evaluations were done basing on this type <strong>of</strong> samples. However,<br />
due to the fact that collection <strong>of</strong> nasal washes from animals could<br />
be complicated, we have decided to use nasal swabs as they are<br />
much easier to get in the field conditions.<br />
Basing on the evaluation <strong>of</strong> sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV<br />
<strong>of</strong> the strip tests, it can be concluded that most reliable was TRU<br />
RSV. Although its sensitivity was lower compared to BinaxNOW<br />
RSV it was characterized by very high specificity as well as PPV<br />
and NPV.That meant that samples positive by TRU RSV were<br />
true positives. TRU RSV could therefore be used as a supportive<br />
rapid screen test for BRSV detection at the farm. However, due<br />
to the limited sensitivity, negative results would have to be<br />
confirmed by more sensitive tests like RT-PCR.<br />
References<br />
1.Larsen, L.E., 2000, Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV):<br />
a review. Acta Ve. Scand 41: 1-24.<br />
2.Selvarangan, R., Abe, D., Hamilton, M., 2008. Comparison <strong>of</strong> BD<br />
Directigen EZ RSV and Binax NOW RSV tests for rapid detection <strong>of</strong><br />
respiratory syncytial virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates in a pediatric<br />
population. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 62: 157-161.<br />
3.Valarcher, J.F., Taylor, G., 2007. Bovine respiratory syncytial virus<br />
infection. Ve. Res 38: 153-180.<br />
4.Vilcek, S., Elvander, M., Ballagi-Pordány, A., Belák S., 1994.<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> nested PCR assays for detection <strong>of</strong> bovine respiratory<br />
syncytial virus in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 32: 2225-2231.
S2 - O - 04<br />
EVALUATION OF A LATEX AGGLUTINATION TEST FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM<br />
DIFFICILE OF PORCINE ORIGIN<br />
Introduction<br />
Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in piglets less<br />
than 1 week old is considered emerging and <strong>of</strong> great importance<br />
for its direct effects on piglet performance. Although no direct<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> animal-to-human transmission, isolation and<br />
accurate identification <strong>of</strong> CD strains are crucial for both<br />
diagnostics and epidemiology <strong>of</strong> CDAD, due to the significant<br />
overlap between strains implicated in CD infection in humans and<br />
animals. A definitive diagnostic <strong>of</strong> CD infection is usually<br />
achieved by combining toxin testing <strong>of</strong> stool specimens, along<br />
with isolation and further toxin production test by CD isolates.<br />
Jaime Maldonado 1 , Laura Valls 1<br />
1<br />
Hipra, Diagnostic Center, Girona, Spain<br />
Clostridium difficile, latex, agglutination<br />
In addition to the colony morphology and growth features in<br />
selective culture media, definitive identification <strong>of</strong> CD in pure<br />
cultures is <strong>of</strong>ten accomplished by biochemical pr<strong>of</strong>iling, and by<br />
PCR amplification <strong>of</strong> CD-specific or toxin genes. Commercial<br />
latex agglutination test (LAT) for presumptive identification <strong>of</strong> CD<br />
in stools, broth cultures and solid media are available as an<br />
alternative to costly and labour-intensive assay. They are rapid<br />
and simple assays for the early identification <strong>of</strong> CD. In this study<br />
we aimed to evaluate the usefulness <strong>of</strong> a LAT kit for the<br />
presumptive identification <strong>of</strong> CD strains <strong>of</strong> porcine origin.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The C. difficile Test Kit (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) was evaluated<br />
using three groups <strong>of</strong> bacteria: 1) The test was validated with five<br />
well identified CD strains <strong>of</strong> porcine origin from previous studies<br />
(1), with known toxin and ribotype pr<strong>of</strong>iles; 2) Further evaluation<br />
was carried out with 41 CD field isolates coming from suckling<br />
piglets suffering from diarrhoea in the 1 st week <strong>of</strong> age. They came<br />
from the same number <strong>of</strong> epidemiologically unrelated pig<br />
breeding units, and were collected in the period 2008-2011.<br />
Bacterial culture and identification were performed as previously<br />
described (1). Definitive identification to species level was carried<br />
out using the API Rapid ID 32 A kit (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile,<br />
France); 3) Cross-reactivity in the LAT kit was determined using<br />
reference and collection strains <strong>of</strong> swine Escherichia coli (n=4),<br />
Clostridium perfringens types A, B, C, D and E (n=5), Salmonella<br />
typhimurium (n=1), Proteus mirabilis (n=1) and Clostridium novyi<br />
(n=1). The LAT kit was performed as per manufacturer’s<br />
instructions, with all three groups <strong>of</strong> bacteria involved in the<br />
study. Agglutination reactions were scored as negative (0), mild<br />
(1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+).<br />
Results<br />
When LAT was carried out with well characterized CD antigens <strong>of</strong><br />
porcine origin, it correctly identified all five bacteria with a strong<br />
(3+) agglutination reaction. Similarly, all 41 field CD strains<br />
identified by the API system with excellent (24,4%) or good<br />
(75.6%) identification scores, also tested positive with 1+<br />
(14.6%), 2+ (29.3%), or 3+ (56.1%) agglutination reactions. No<br />
correlation between the two scores was observed.<br />
Nevertheless, with respect to cross-reactivity, two strains <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
perfringens (Types A [3+] and E [1+]), one strain <strong>of</strong> E. coli (3+),<br />
and the swine pathogen C. novyi (2+) tested positive in the LAT,<br />
and hence were incorrectly identified as being CD.<br />
Figure 1: Latex agglutination test: 1. Swine C. difficile strong<br />
reaction (3+); 2-4. Cross-reactivity <strong>of</strong> swine C. novyi (2+), C.<br />
perfringens type A (3+) and E. coli (3+), respectively; 5.<br />
Negative control <strong>of</strong> the test. 6. Positive control <strong>of</strong> the test.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
Taking together, the results obtained in this study indicates that<br />
the LAT kit has a good ability to identify CD, since none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
collection or field CD strains tested negative. However, the fact<br />
that three bacterial species that are part <strong>of</strong> the pig intestinal flora<br />
have tested positive, indicates that positive results using this kit<br />
should be interpreted with caution. In fact, the kit manufacturer<br />
warns <strong>of</strong> the need to confirm all positive results, which is<br />
evidenced in this study.<br />
Considering that a wide variety <strong>of</strong> CD strains were tested by LAT<br />
in the present study, it is reasonable to assume that negative<br />
agglutination test results obtained with the evaluated kit, under<br />
the described conditions (pure cultures on solid media), may<br />
correspond to true negative. Consequently, the LAT kit described<br />
could eventually be used to test porcine bacterial cultures<br />
suspicious <strong>of</strong> being CD; positive results must be confirmed by a<br />
more specific assay, and negative results should be coupled with<br />
growth features and case history.<br />
Although CDAD is considered a major threat for the swine<br />
industry, and despite the obvious similarities between the CD<br />
strains affecting humans and domestic animals, existing<br />
diagnostic tools have not been evaluated in depth using clinical<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> porcine origin. It would be necessary to do so, with<br />
those test intended for toxin detection in stools and molecular<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> toxin genes, in order to improve the current<br />
diagnostic approach to CD-related neonatal diarrhoea in swine.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank Carmen Sánchez and Lidia López who collected and<br />
identified bacterial strains during the study.<br />
References<br />
1. Alvarez-Perez S, Blanco JL, Bouza E, Alba P, Gibert X, Maldonado J,<br />
Garcia. (2009). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeic and nondiarrhoeic<br />
piglets. Vet. Microbiol, 137, 302-5.
Oral presentations<br />
“Emerging, re-emerging<br />
and wildlife diseases –<br />
diagnostic possibilities”<br />
(3 rd session)
S3 - K - 01<br />
EMERGING AND RE-EMERGING WILDLIFE DISEASES: PATHOLOGY AND RELATED TECHNIQUES<br />
FOR DIAGNOSTICS AND FOR GENERAL AND TARGETED SURVEILLANCE<br />
Dolores-Gavier Widén<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Deputy Head <strong>of</strong> Department, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), SE‐75189 Uppsala, Sweden<br />
Wildlife surveillance, emerging diseases, pathology<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> wildlife and wildlife diseases<br />
Wild animals have high economic, social, ecological and cultural<br />
value and play fundamental roles in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> stable<br />
ecosystems. Wildlife contributes significantly to recreation and<br />
tourism. Hunting is an important socio-economic activity. Within<br />
the EU hunting is estimated to be worth €16 billion 1 and there are<br />
more than 7 million hunters in Europe. 2<br />
Wildlife trade is a fast growing market and contributes to the<br />
worldwide spreading <strong>of</strong> new pathogens and emerging diseases,<br />
for example giant liver fluke (Fascioloides magna) was introduced<br />
into Europe in elk from North America. Natural migration <strong>of</strong> wild<br />
animals has similar consequences, as exemplified by the global<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza. Wildlife<br />
reservoirs maintain infections which may spillover to domestic<br />
animals, making the control and eradication difficult, for example<br />
tuberculosis and classical swine fever. Wild animals host<br />
numerous zoonotic infections. Humans can acquire infections<br />
through direct contact with wild animals, for instance rabies and<br />
tularemia, through food consumption, as trichinosis and hepatitis<br />
E, or from the environment contaminated by wildlife, such as<br />
hantavirus infections or alveolar echinococcosis.<br />
Mass mortality in wild animals results in public concern, as seen<br />
during botulism outbreaks in waterfowl, trichomoniasis epidemics<br />
in wild finches and morbillivirus infections in seals. Furthermore,<br />
diseases may have a devastating impact on wildlife populations<br />
and threaten their conservation, like White Nose Syndrome<br />
(Geomyces destructans infection) in bats.<br />
Therefore, the value <strong>of</strong> maintaining diverse and healthy wildlife<br />
populations cannot be overestimated. The importance <strong>of</strong> wildlife<br />
surveillance and the interest on diagnosing infections in wild<br />
animals has increased rapidly in Europe and globally. This is<br />
clearly supported by the Director General <strong>of</strong> the OIE, who stated<br />
that “Surveillance <strong>of</strong> wildlife diseases must be considered equally<br />
as important as surveillance and control <strong>of</strong> diseases in domestic<br />
animals”. 3<br />
Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases<br />
Emerging infectious diseases (EID) include broad categories <strong>of</strong><br />
infections characterized by changes in their epidemiological<br />
presentation. EID are diseases whose incidence has increased in<br />
a defined time period and location or threatens to increase. If the<br />
infection was unknown in the place before, the disease is<br />
regarded as emerging, but if it had been present at the location in<br />
the past and was considered controlled or eradicated, the<br />
infection is considered to be re-emerging. The following situations<br />
are all examples and mechanisms <strong>of</strong> EID: new pathogens or<br />
newly evolved strains <strong>of</strong> existing pathogens, spread to new<br />
geographic area (for example through wildlife migration or<br />
translocation), spread to new populations, increase in<br />
prevalence, detection <strong>of</strong> previously unrecognized pathogens and<br />
old infections reemerging as a result <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial resistance.<br />
Emerging infectious diseases (EID) in humans are dominated by<br />
zoonoses, and constitute 60% <strong>of</strong> EID events. 4<br />
A high rate <strong>of</strong><br />
these zoonoses (72%) are caused by pathogens with a wildlife<br />
origin, and this rate has increased significantly with time<br />
(controlling for reporting effort). 4<br />
As a whole, zoonoses from<br />
wildlife are considered the most significant, growing threat to<br />
global health <strong>of</strong> all EID. Vector-borne diseases are frequent<br />
among EID events (22.8% <strong>of</strong> events) and these infections have<br />
also increased over time. 4 Climate change is probably implicated,<br />
however, it is difficult to demonstrate causal relationships<br />
between EID events and climate change. Emerging pathogens<br />
are more likely to be zoonotic or vector-borne with a broad host<br />
range. 4 Drivers such as human population density, antibiotic drug<br />
use and agricultural practices are major determinants <strong>of</strong> the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> EID events. 4<br />
Good knowledge and rapid identification <strong>of</strong> emerging infectious<br />
diseases occurring in wildlife are essential for the design and<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> preventing, control and mitigating measures to<br />
protect the health <strong>of</strong> humans and animals.<br />
Wildlife health surveillance<br />
Surveillance, is defined by the OIE) as “the systematic ongoing<br />
collection, collation, and analysis <strong>of</strong> information related to animal<br />
health and the timely dissemination <strong>of</strong> information to those who<br />
need to know so that action can be taken”. 5<br />
General wildlife<br />
disease surveillance, also named passive surveillance, identifies<br />
ill or dead wild animals and conducts diagnostic investigations to<br />
determine the cause <strong>of</strong> disease or death. The investigations<br />
include <strong>of</strong> a broad range <strong>of</strong> wildlife hosts and pathogens or<br />
diseases. Targeted surveillance, also named specific or active<br />
surveillance, identifies a specific infection or disease,<br />
serologically or demonstrating the pathogen. Surveillance<br />
informs about occurrence <strong>of</strong> pathogens, wildlife hosts and<br />
locations <strong>of</strong> endemic infections and can also result in the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> new pathogens or diseases. Long term surveillance<br />
detects changes in disease patterns, which contribute to<br />
epidemiological analyses and risk assessment. All together,<br />
surveillance is essential in the control and eradication <strong>of</strong><br />
infectious diseases.<br />
There is a great variation in the level <strong>of</strong> wildlife surveillance<br />
conducted in different countries in Europe. As a whole, more<br />
than 18,000 wild animals are investigated by general surveillance<br />
and more than 50,000 by targeted surveillance annually in<br />
Europe. 6<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests to be used for surveillance <strong>of</strong><br />
wildlife diseases needs to take into consideration several factors,<br />
for example the purpose <strong>of</strong> the testing (such as certifying<br />
freedom from infection before translocation, estimating<br />
prevalence, or others), the practicalities and applicability to field<br />
investigations, the cost <strong>of</strong> the tests and the known performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the method in the host species to be tested.<br />
Test validation<br />
The performance <strong>of</strong> tests designed and validated for use in<br />
domestic animals is most <strong>of</strong>ten not known when applied to<br />
wildlife species. Diagnostic testing <strong>of</strong> wild animals is challenging<br />
in several ways, for example the samples may be <strong>of</strong> poor quality<br />
or difficult to obtain. Likewise, validation <strong>of</strong> assays for wildlife also<br />
presents difficulties. In 2011, the OIE established an ad hoc<br />
group which drafted guidelines on “Principles and methods for<br />
the validation <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests for infectious diseases<br />
applicable to wildlife”, 7 which take into consideration the intrinsic<br />
difficulties <strong>of</strong> validating tests for wildlife. In the guidelines,<br />
pathways and stages are proposed for validation <strong>of</strong> tests with two<br />
different starting points, when a previously validated test in<br />
domestic animals exists and when it does not. It is proposed that<br />
when full validation is not possible, the best alternative may be to<br />
evaluate the fitness <strong>of</strong> the test in a small number <strong>of</strong> reference<br />
samples. These preliminary estimates may give sufficient<br />
information to obtain provisional acceptance <strong>of</strong> the test by the<br />
authorities; this is a new step /category within stage 2 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
validation process.<br />
Pathology<br />
Pathology is a primary component in general wildlife disease<br />
surveillance. Rudolph Virchow (1821-1902), a founding father <strong>of</strong><br />
pathology, made seminal advancements in the understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
infectious diseases based on observations at abbatoirs and <strong>of</strong><br />
tissue changes at the cellular level; he was active in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> meat inspection. Today, despite the technical
advances, the fundamental tools <strong>of</strong> pathology are still post<br />
mortem examination and histopathology, and these are the<br />
starting point for many diagnostic investigations. Additionally,<br />
pathology is essential in the early and rapid identification <strong>of</strong><br />
emerging infections and/or changes in disease patterns.<br />
Pathology techniques<br />
Histopathology is conducted as a standard on haematoxylin-eosin<br />
stained sections. Specific stains are used to identify structures<br />
and substances and to help visualize pathogens, for example<br />
Congo red for amyloid and Ziehl-Neelsen for acid fast bacteria.<br />
Enzyme histochemistry can be used to test enzyme activities in<br />
muscle diseases and in other conditions. Cytology, the study <strong>of</strong><br />
cells spread on slides, is applied on clinical samples, such as<br />
liquid punctures, or smears <strong>of</strong> organs. Electron microscopy is<br />
used to characterize structural changes in cells and tissues and to<br />
support the morphological changes observed by microscopy.<br />
Immunohistochemistry is used to reveal specific antigens or<br />
proteins in tissue sections applying labelled antibodies against the<br />
particular protein and visualizing the antigen-antibody reaction by<br />
a marker such as fluorescent dye or enzyme. IHC is a very useful<br />
technique used to classify tumors and detect bacteria, viruses and<br />
parasites. Importantly, IHC allows associating the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogens with lesions. IHC can be automated and is widely<br />
applied to diagnosis. Double-labelling techniques are used to<br />
identify two or more different proteins, giving information on for<br />
example cell type and presence <strong>of</strong> a particular virus in the cell.<br />
Immuno-electron microscopy uses immunolabelling <strong>of</strong> ultrathin<br />
sections, and is visualized with markers as colloidal gold particles.<br />
Quantifying pathology gives detailed information on lesions<br />
numbers and size. This results in accurate descriptions, for<br />
example <strong>of</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> advancement and dissemination <strong>of</strong> lesions,<br />
and allows comparison <strong>of</strong> lesion severity between animals, for<br />
instance, in assessment <strong>of</strong> disease protection by vaccine<br />
candidates. Morphometry, the macroscopic or microscopic<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> lesions, or parts <strong>of</strong> lesions (for example necrosis)<br />
gives quantitative data. Computerized image analysis allows<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> data in a short time. Scoring <strong>of</strong><br />
lesions is a semi-quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong> lesions size and/or<br />
number, the scoring has to be standardized for each application.<br />
Imaging techniques developed for clinical application in humans<br />
allow tridimensional measurements. They can also be used in<br />
veterinary pathology for measuring lesions in dead animals,<br />
mostly in experimental settings. Some examples are magnetic<br />
resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector computed<br />
tomography (MDCT), used for example to measure the<br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> lesions in pulmonary tuberculosis. X-rays are used<br />
frequently in wildlife pathology for forensic investigations to detect<br />
bullet fragments in carcasses.<br />
Molecular diagnostics are increasingly used to identify pathogens<br />
in combination with the diagnostic histopathology. In situ<br />
hybridization is based on the hybridization <strong>of</strong> a labelled probe (a<br />
small specific DNA or RNA sequence); with a complementary<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> for example virus, on a tissue section, the reaction<br />
can be visualized by chromogens or fluorescein (FISH). PCR and<br />
the numerous rapidly developing PCR-based techniques are<br />
widely used to establish an etiological diagnosis. PCR is usually<br />
performed in unfixed (fresh or frozen) samples, but in many cases<br />
can be applied to formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. The<br />
target lesion, for example a granuloma, can be micro-dissected<br />
and tested individually. Microarray technology detects large<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> genomes simultaneously allowing identification <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple infectious agents at the same time in one sample. The<br />
EU project WildTech, 8 is developing tests for screening wildlife<br />
populations for infections, including nucleic acid microarrays and<br />
ELISA technology adapted to microarray format for serology.<br />
Obtaining the correct sample <strong>of</strong> target tissues and lesions for<br />
laboratory testing is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance, in particular when<br />
small amounts <strong>of</strong> tissues are tested. A very sensitive method<br />
applied to “the wrong sample” can have a small chance <strong>of</strong><br />
detecting the pathogen.<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> networking<br />
Wildlife disease surveillance is a very extensive field involving<br />
different diagnostic disciplines and a broad range <strong>of</strong> wildlife hosts<br />
and pathogens. It also includes epidemiology and communication<br />
activities. Networking among disciplines and across national and<br />
organization boundaries is <strong>of</strong> great benefit in surveillance<br />
programs. Organizations such as the European Association <strong>of</strong><br />
Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (EAVLD) 9 and the Wildlife<br />
Disease Association (WDA) 10 , with its European Section (EWDA)<br />
are excellent forums.<br />
Conclusions<br />
In conclusion, pathology plays a key role in wildlife surveillance<br />
and in discovering new diseases and is the starting point <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnostic investigations. Importantly, pathology informs about<br />
the significance, in terms <strong>of</strong> disease, <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> infectious<br />
agents or particular strains <strong>of</strong> agents demonstrated by laboratory<br />
tests. Classical descriptive pathology is today more refined by<br />
new techniques but cannot be replaced by other disciplines and<br />
will continue to be a cornerstone in the detection and<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> emerging diseases. Wild animals play an<br />
increasingly important role in emerging infectious diseases, in<br />
particular zoonoses. This trend will possibly continue in the<br />
future.<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
WildTech, a project <strong>of</strong> the European Commission under the Food,<br />
Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnology Theme <strong>of</strong> the 7th<br />
Framework Programme for Research and Technological<br />
Development, grant agreement no. 222633.<br />
References<br />
1. Kenward, R. & Sharp, R. (2008) Use Nationally <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Resources<br />
Across Europe, 117-132.: in Manos, P. & Papathanasiou, J. [eds.] (2008)<br />
GEM-CON-BIO: Governance & Ecosystems Management for the<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity. Thessaloniki<br />
2. Federation <strong>of</strong> Associations for Hunting and Conservation <strong>of</strong> the EU<br />
(FACE), at: www.face.eu/aboutus-en.htm<br />
3. Vallat B. 2008, OIE editorial. Improving wildlife surveillance for its<br />
protection while protecting us from the diseases it transmits. At :<br />
www.oie.int/en/for-the -media/editorials/detail/article/improving -wildlifesurveillance-for-its-protection-while-protecting-us-from-the-diseases-ittransmit/<br />
4. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Kate E. Jones, Nikkita<br />
G. Patel, Marc A. Levy, Adam Storeygard, Deborah Balk, John L.<br />
Gittleman, & Peter Daszak. Nature. Vol 451| 21 February 2008|<br />
doi:10.1038/nature06536<br />
5. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2009) Terrestrial Animal<br />
Health Code , 18 th Ed. Glossary. OIE. Paris. Available at:<br />
www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=glossaire.htm#terme_surveill<br />
ance).<br />
6. Establishing a European network for wildlife health surveillance. Kuiken,<br />
T., Ryser-Degiorgis M.-P., Gavier-Widén, D., Gortázar, C. Rev. Sci. Tech.<br />
Off. Int. Epiz, 2011, 30 (3), 755-761.<br />
7. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE BIOLOGICAL STANDARDS<br />
COMMISSION Paris, 14–16 September 2011. At: www.oiw.int/<br />
8.WildTech at: www.wildtechproject.com/wildtech/<br />
9. European Association <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians<br />
(EAVLD), at www.<strong>eavld</strong>.org/<br />
10. Wildlife Disease Association (WDA), at : www.wildlifedisease.org
S3 - O - 01<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS OUTBREAK IN THE NETHERLANDS: ROUTINE DIAGNOSTICS AND TEST<br />
RESULTS<br />
Ruth Bouwstra 1 , Wim van der Poel 1 , Eric de Kluijver 1 , Betty Verstraten 1 , Johan Bongers 1<br />
1<br />
Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Lelystad, The Netherlands.<br />
Introduction<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> 2011, a new Orthobunya virus named<br />
Schmallenberg virus (SBV), was discovered in Germany. Soon<br />
thereafter in the Netherlands, the virus was associated with<br />
decreased milk production, watery diarrhoea and fever in dairy<br />
cows, and subsequently also with congenital malformations in<br />
calves, lambs and goat kids (1,2). By the 20th <strong>of</strong> December 2011<br />
in the Netherlands malformations in new-borns <strong>of</strong> ruminants were<br />
made notifiable. After a notification by a farmer or veterinarian, a<br />
maximum <strong>of</strong> five malformed new-borns per farm were<br />
necropsied. The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus disease was<br />
based on the pathologic findings and RT-PCR test results <strong>of</strong><br />
brain tissue <strong>of</strong> the malformed new-borns. In addition blood<br />
samples from mothers <strong>of</strong> affected new-borns were collected and<br />
tested for antibodies against SBV using a virus neutralization<br />
test.<br />
Schmallenberg virus, routine diagnostics, test results<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Brain samples were tested with the RT-PCR for Schmallenberg<br />
virus that has been developed by the Friedrich-Loeffler Institute in<br />
Germany. Serum samples were tested in a virus neutralisation<br />
test (VNT) against SBV developed by the Central Veterinary<br />
Institute. A virus isolate from brain tissue <strong>of</strong> a lamb, 4th passage<br />
on VERO cells, was used in the test (3).<br />
Results<br />
Between 20th <strong>of</strong> December and March the 8th, in total 1165 brain<br />
tissue samples were tested in the RT-PCR: 577 originated from<br />
lambs, 444 from calves and 42 from goat kids. In the VNT 681<br />
blood samples were tested: 329 originated from ewes, 329 from<br />
cows and 23 from goats. Results showed that 8% <strong>of</strong> the tested<br />
calf brains, 31% <strong>of</strong> the tested lamb brains and 12% <strong>of</strong> the tested<br />
goat kid brains were RT-PCR positive. The number <strong>of</strong> malformed<br />
lambs and RT-PCR positive lamb brains decreases over time<br />
while the number <strong>of</strong> malformed calves and RT-PCR positive calf<br />
brains increases (fig 1,2). In the VNT 95% <strong>of</strong> the ewes, 93% <strong>of</strong><br />
the cows and 23% <strong>of</strong> the goats tested positive. Combining the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the RT-PCR and the VNT, 20% <strong>of</strong> all farms tested<br />
positive in both the RT-PCR (genetic material <strong>of</strong> SBV in brain<br />
tissue in malformed new-borns) and the VNT (antibodies against<br />
SBV in blood from mothers <strong>of</strong> affected new-borns ). The results<br />
reported here are based on testing up to the first week <strong>of</strong> March<br />
<strong>2012</strong>. Additional test results which will be available in June will<br />
be presented also.<br />
Figure 2: Number <strong>of</strong> RT-PCR positive (dark grey bars) and RT-<br />
PCR negative (light grey bars) calf brain tissue samples per<br />
week.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
In goats the number <strong>of</strong> seropositives is far lower than in sheep<br />
and cattle. Less samples from goats were tested and the<br />
estimated seroprevalence is therefore less precise. Furthermore<br />
number <strong>of</strong> RT-PCR positive calves and goat kids is far lower than<br />
in sheep. Given that goats, in contrast to cattle and sheep, are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten housed indoors, and the SBV is supposedly transmitted by<br />
Culicoides vectors, this lower number <strong>of</strong> test positive results<br />
would not be surprising. In addition, the difference in pregnancy<br />
length between cows and sheep might explain why it is more<br />
difficult to detect genetic material <strong>of</strong> SBV in brain tissue <strong>of</strong> calves<br />
and, assuming that infection <strong>of</strong> cows and sheep was around the<br />
same period, it might also explain the difference in number <strong>of</strong><br />
malformations and RT-positives over time. Supposing that all<br />
malformations notificated are truly caused by the Schmallenberg<br />
virus, on farm level, diagnostic sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the RT-PCR is much<br />
lower in comparison with the VNT.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank our colleagues from the Dispatching Service Unit and<br />
the Virological Diagnostic Laboratory for execution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
diagnostic testing.<br />
References<br />
1. Muskens J, Smolenaars AJG, van der Poel WHM, Mars MH, van<br />
Wuijckhuise L, Holzhauer M, van Weering H, Kock P. Diarrhea and loss <strong>of</strong><br />
production on Dutch dairy farms caused by the Schmallenburg virus.<br />
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. <strong>2012</strong>; 137: 112-5.<br />
2. Van den Brom R, Luttikholt SJM, Lievaart-Peteron K, Pperkamp NHMT,<br />
Mars MH, van der Poel WHM, Vellema P. Epizootic <strong>of</strong> ovine congenital<br />
malformations associated with Schmallenberg virus infection. Tijdschr<br />
Diergeneeskd <strong>2012</strong>; 137: 106-11.<br />
3. Loeffen WLA et al. J Virol Methods <strong>2012</strong> (in preparation)<br />
Figure 1: Number <strong>of</strong> RT-PCR positive (dark grey bars) and RT-<br />
PCR negative (light grey bars) lamb brain tissue samples per<br />
week.
S3 - O - 02<br />
25 YEARS OF PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE OF BATS IN THE NETHERLANDS. MOLECULAR<br />
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF EBLV-1.<br />
Introduction<br />
Since 1986 a reactive surveillance program is running in the<br />
Netherlands to investigate the presence <strong>of</strong> European Bat<br />
Lyssavirusses (EBLV-1 and EBLV-2) in bats. In this program all<br />
contact cases, with human or pets, are send to the laboratory in<br />
Lelystad and tested for EBLV with a EU prescribed immune<br />
fluorescence test (IFT). Up to date almost 5000 samples have<br />
been tested. The main reservoir for EBLV is Eptesicus serotinus,<br />
334 positive cases so far which is about 22% <strong>of</strong> the samples<br />
tested, second species is Myotis dasycneme, with almost 4%<br />
positive thus far (Table 1). EBLV-2 has not been detected in the<br />
Netherlands since 1993.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Bat brains were tested using the prescribed fluorescent antibody<br />
test (FAT). For conformation a real time PCR test on the N-gene<br />
was used. On the same nucleic acid isolation used for the realtime<br />
PCR N and G-gene sequencing was performed on an ABI<br />
sequencer according to the manufacturers protocol. The species<br />
<strong>of</strong> all submissions were determined by a bat expert.<br />
The MCC phylogenetic tree, estimates <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />
evolution (substitutions per site per year) and the TMRCA for the<br />
alignments were inferred using a Bayesian MCMC method in the<br />
BEAST package.<br />
B. Kooi, A. Vogel and E. Van Weezep<br />
Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong> Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands.<br />
Lyssavirus, EBLV, bats, surveillance, molecular epidemiology<br />
Results & Discussion<br />
We performed a molecular epidemiology study on a collection <strong>of</strong><br />
more then 40 EBLV-1 viruses that currently circulate in the<br />
Netherlands. Based on the sequences <strong>of</strong> the coding regions <strong>of</strong><br />
the N and G genes a phylogenetic analysis was performed in<br />
which the two distinct lineages or subgroups EBLV-1a and EBLV-<br />
1b were clearly visible (Fig. 1). Surprisingly the larger EBLV-1a<br />
group could be further subdivided into three phylogenetic groups<br />
that were consistent with topology. Two groups were<br />
predominantly found in the northern provinces whereas the third<br />
group was spread from east to west in the middle <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
A most recent common ancestor analysis was performed which<br />
confirmed a distinct difference in origin <strong>of</strong> the two EBLV-1<br />
subgroups. Whereas the EBLV-1a subgroup migrated into<br />
Europe via the east-west route, EBLV-1b apparently entered the<br />
continent from the south, most likely through the Iberian<br />
Peninsula.<br />
.<br />
Table 1: Passive lyssavirus surveillance <strong>of</strong> bats (1986-2011)<br />
Species tested postitive<br />
no determination 10 -<br />
Myotis mystacinus 22 -<br />
Myotis nattereri 10 -<br />
Myotis daubentonii 124 -<br />
Myotis dasycneme 138 5<br />
Pipistrellus pipistrellus 2216 -<br />
Pipistrellus nathusii 358 -<br />
Nyctalus noctula 77 -<br />
Nyctalus leisleri 4 -<br />
Eptesicus serotinus 1491 334<br />
Vespertilio murinus 13 -<br />
Plecotus auritus 257 -<br />
total 4720 339<br />
Figure 1: Phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> EBLV-1 based on G-protein<br />
coding regions <strong>of</strong> EBLV-1 from bats from the Netherlands (2004-<br />
2011)<br />
References<br />
1. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by<br />
sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7(1):214.<br />
2. Cliquet, F and Barrat J, 2008. Rabies (chapter 2.1.13). Manual <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, OIE (World<br />
Organisation for Animal Health), Paris, 1: 304-322
S3 - O - 03<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF Q FEVER IN DAIRY CATTLE BY PHASE-SPECIFIC MILK-SEROLOGY<br />
Böttcher J 1 , Frangoulidis D 2 , Schumacher M 1 , Janowetz B 1 , Gangl A 1 , Alex M 1<br />
1 Bavarian Animal Health Service, Poing, Germany,<br />
2<br />
Bundeswehr Institute <strong>of</strong> Microbiology, Munich, Germany<br />
Q fever, serology<br />
Introduction<br />
Dairy cattle herds are frequently endemically infected by C.<br />
burnetii the causative pathogen <strong>of</strong> Q fever. Shedding <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
burnetii at calving and in milk is <strong>of</strong> special concern. Chronic<br />
infection frequently results in an increased level <strong>of</strong> milk-shedding.<br />
The diagnostic value <strong>of</strong> phase-specific serology was assessed by<br />
a longitudinal study on milk samples and puerperal swabs in an<br />
endemically infected dairy cattle herd with about 100 dairy cows.<br />
PhII titer<br />
10000<br />
1000<br />
100<br />
10<br />
PhI-serology<br />
negative<br />
positive<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Cows were kept in two groups (MS and RB) with close contact<br />
within one barn. The same calving boxes are used for both<br />
groups. Individual milk samples were collected from March 2010<br />
until December 2011; since August 2010 puerperal swab were<br />
collected from a proportion <strong>of</strong> cows within 16 h after calving.<br />
Samples: 405 milk samples, 59 puerperal, 9 samplings (MS) and<br />
465 milk samples, 64 puerperal swabs, 10 samplings (RB).<br />
Phase-specific ELISAs were performed as described (1) with<br />
minor modifications: Milk samples were diluted 1/5 log 10 and the<br />
titer was calculated at 20% (OD%) <strong>of</strong> the positive control (serum<br />
control diluted 1/400).<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> positive samples<br />
1,4<br />
1,2<br />
1<br />
0,8<br />
0,6<br />
0,4<br />
0,2<br />
0<br />
swabs<br />
milk samples<br />
1003 1004 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112<br />
52 46 98 0 46 57 57 52 0 54 58 51 52 0 56 45 47 0 52 46<br />
0 0 0 5 11 2 10 9 5 9 8 5 0 7 5 3 6 8 11 6<br />
Sampling (YYMM) and number <strong>of</strong> milk-samples and swabs, respectively<br />
Fig. 1: Frequency <strong>of</strong> positive qPCR (CI95%) was plotted over<br />
year/month <strong>of</strong> sample collection (YYMM, top), the number <strong>of</strong> milk<br />
samples (middle) and the number <strong>of</strong> analysed puerperal swabs (bottom).<br />
Cut-<strong>of</strong>fs for milk&swabs were ≥10 C.b./ml milk and ≥1 C.b./swab.<br />
qPCR (C.b. log10/swab and ml milk, resp.)<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1003<br />
1004<br />
puerperal swabs<br />
milk<br />
1007<br />
1008<br />
1009<br />
1010<br />
1011<br />
1012<br />
1101<br />
1102<br />
1103<br />
1104<br />
Sampling (YYMM)<br />
Fig. 2: Amount <strong>of</strong> C. burnetii-target in qPCR-positive swabs and milk<br />
samples. qPCR scored positive if the titer exceeded 1 C.b./swab and ml<br />
milk, respectively.<br />
Milk samples and puerperal swabs were analysed by quantitative<br />
(q) PCR (2). Target was quantified by a standard curve derived<br />
from diluted C. burnetii reference isolate Nine Mile RSA493<br />
(kindly provided by C. Heydel, Giessen).<br />
The status <strong>of</strong> milk-shedding was assessed by two procedures: (1)<br />
Mean shedding per cow was calculated (C.b./ml) and classified<br />
as 1000 C.b./ml. (2) Shedding<br />
pattern was defined as chronic shedding (CS; >3 times ≥10<br />
C.b./ml) irrespective <strong>of</strong> negative results in between. Intermittent<br />
shedding (IS3, IS2, IS1) with 3, 2 and 1 positive result, and<br />
negative, if all samples gave less than 10 C.b./ml. Classification<br />
relied on a minimum <strong>of</strong> three samples except for IS3, this status<br />
required four samplings.<br />
1105<br />
1106<br />
1107<br />
1108<br />
1109<br />
1110<br />
1111<br />
1112<br />
1<br />
1003<br />
1004<br />
1007<br />
1009<br />
1010<br />
1011<br />
1012<br />
1102<br />
1103<br />
1104<br />
Milk sampling (YYMM)<br />
Fig. 3: PhII-titers in cows (500. Only one multiparous CScow<br />
remained just below 500. Positive predictive value for PhI 500<br />
was 40%, whereas it was 25% for PhI 100 and PhII 100 , respectively.<br />
In contrast to CS-cows, IS1/IS2-cows were characterized by a<br />
striking instability <strong>of</strong> PhI- and PhII-results. Even after positive<br />
puerperal swabs seroconversion in milk was not a regular finding.<br />
PhI - /PhII + -pattern in young cows indicates the episode <strong>of</strong><br />
puerperal shedding at herd level and PhI 500 is a suitable<br />
screening for heavy milk shedders.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The present study was supported financially by the Free State Bavaria and the<br />
Bavarian Joint Founding Scheme for the Control and Eradication <strong>of</strong> Contagious<br />
Livestock Diseases (Bayerische Tierseuchenkasse).<br />
References<br />
1. Böttcher, J., Vossen, A., Janowetz, B., Alex, M., Gangl, A., Randt A., and Meier,<br />
N. (2011): Insights into the dynamics <strong>of</strong> endemic Coxiella burnetii infection in<br />
cattle by application <strong>of</strong> phase-specific ELISAs in an infected dairy herd.<br />
Veterinrary Microbiology, 151, 291-300.<br />
2. Böttcher, J., Frangoulidis, D., Schumacher, M., Janowetz, B., Gangl, A., Alex,<br />
M. (<strong>2012</strong>): Diagnostic value <strong>of</strong> Coxiella burnetii phase I and II antibody titers in<br />
individual milk samples <strong>of</strong> cows. In preparation.<br />
1108<br />
1109<br />
1111<br />
1112
S3 – O - 04<br />
EQUINE NOCARDIOFORM PLACENTITIS & ABORTION OUTBREAK<br />
AND FARM-BASED RISK FACTOR STUDY, 2010-2011<br />
Craig N. Carter 1 , Jacki C Cassady 1 , Noah Cohen 2 , Laura A Kennedy 1 , Erdal Erol 1 , Tamara Malm 1 ,<br />
Mike Donahue 1 , Steve Sells 1 , Neil Williams 1 Jacqueline Smith 1 , Roberta Dwyer 3<br />
1<br />
Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA<br />
2 Large Animal Clinic, College <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA<br />
3 Gluck Equine Research Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA<br />
Equine, horse, placentitis, abortion, epidemiology<br />
Introduction<br />
The syndrome now known as equine nocardi<strong>of</strong>orm placentitis &<br />
abortion (NPA) that was first seen in Kentucky in the 1980’s, is<br />
caused by nocardi<strong>of</strong>orm actinomycete bacteria. Crossiella equi,<br />
characterized and named in 2002 (1), and various species <strong>of</strong><br />
Amycolatopsis, 3 species characterized and named in 2003 (2),<br />
have been isolated from NPA cases since 1988. Two species <strong>of</strong><br />
Streptomyces (3), both isolated in 1999, have also been<br />
associated with NPA cases. The infection results in late<br />
abortions, stillbirths and premature foaling, sometimes leading to<br />
early neonatal mortality. The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> transmission is not<br />
known. Interestingly, nocardi<strong>of</strong>orm actinomycetes have rarely<br />
been isolated from any tissue other than placenta. Most cases<br />
have occurred in the Bluegrass region <strong>of</strong> Kentucky (Figure 1) but<br />
cases have also been diagnosed in Florida (4), Italy (5), and<br />
South Africa. During the 2010-2011 equine reproductive season,<br />
the Lexington laboratory identified gram positive branching bacilli<br />
in 118 cases by culture and PCR. The high incidence seen in<br />
this season precipitated this farm-level study to identify possible<br />
risk factors for NPA.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A 34 question survey instrument was designed to gather<br />
information on farm size, number <strong>of</strong> mares, mare density, water<br />
sources, feeding/grazing practices, pasture management, pre<br />
and post breeding practices, drugs/supplements used and<br />
diseases/syndromes seen on the farms. A total <strong>of</strong> 497 farms<br />
were contacted with 153 responding. Five <strong>of</strong> the farms were<br />
disqualified, leaving 148 for analysis. Data was analysed using<br />
chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and logistic regression<br />
analysis using S-PLUS, v8.2.<br />
Results<br />
Of the farms surveyed, 98 were affected by NPA during the 2010-<br />
2011 with 50 farms unaffected. The average number <strong>of</strong> mares<br />
affected per farm was 4 (range 1-64). The total number <strong>of</strong> mares<br />
at risk on all farms was 8075 with 429 mares diagnosed with NPA<br />
(5.3% all farms, 6.5% affected farms). The outbreak involved 15<br />
cities and 27 zip codes. Affected farms tended to have greater<br />
acreage (p < 0.0001), had more mares bred (p < 0.0002) and<br />
greater mare density (p = 0.0095). The distribution <strong>of</strong> the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> hours horses were grazed from January-March differed<br />
significantly for affected farms (median 8 hours) and unaffected<br />
farms (median 12 hours). The proportion <strong>of</strong> affected farms using<br />
progesterone pre-breeding was significantly lower than that <strong>of</strong><br />
unaffected farms (OR = 2.9). The proportion <strong>of</strong> affected farms<br />
that administered HCG post-breeding was significantly lower than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> unaffected farms (OR = 2.3) Finally, the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
affected farms that administered NSAIDs pre-breeding was<br />
significantly lower than that for unaffected farms (OR = 2.8).<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
The significant findings <strong>of</strong> farm size, mare numbers and density<br />
related to affected farms may be an indicator that simple<br />
crowding and intensive management <strong>of</strong> mares is a risk factor for<br />
NPA. It might also indicate greater opportunities for diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
NPA. The finding <strong>of</strong> longer grazing times January-March on<br />
unaffected farms may indicate a protective effect, i.e. the barn<br />
environment may be more risky. Use <strong>of</strong> progesterone prebreeding,<br />
HCG post-breeding and NSAIDs pre-breeding might<br />
indicate practices that reduce risk but further studies are needed<br />
as the chance for false discovery is high. These factors could be<br />
better assessed in a case-control study in which the unit <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis is the mare, not the farm. A spatial analysis <strong>of</strong> the data<br />
was not performed.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We owe much gratitude to the farms that participated in the<br />
survey, the Kentucky Thoroughbred Farm Managers Club, the<br />
Kentucky Thoroughbred Association (KTA), the Kentucky<br />
Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders (KTOB), the Kentucky<br />
Association <strong>of</strong> Equine Practitioners (KAEP), David Switzer and<br />
Vickie Garcia <strong>of</strong> KTA and KTOB, Drs. Ernie Martinez and Stuart<br />
Brown <strong>of</strong> the KAEP, and Barbara Dunaway and Susan Neal,<br />
UKVDL.<br />
References<br />
1.Donahue JM., Williams NM., Sells SF and Labeda DP: 2002, Crossiella<br />
equi sp nov., isolated from equine placentas. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Systemic and Evalutionary Microbiology. 52, 2169-2173.<br />
2. Labeda DP, Donahue JM, Williams NM, et al.: 2003, Amycolatopsis<br />
kentuckyensis sp. nov., Amycolatopsis lexingtonensis sp. nov. and<br />
Amycolatopsis pretoriensis sp. nov., isolated from equine placentas.Int J<br />
Syst Evol Microbiol. 53(Pt 5):1601-5.<br />
3. Labeda DP, Price NP, Kroppenstedt RM, et al.: 2009, Streptomyces<br />
atriruber sp. nov. and Streptomyces silaceus sp. nov., two novel species <strong>of</strong><br />
equine origin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 59(Pt 11):2899-903.<br />
4. Christiensen BW, Roberts JF, Pozor MA, et al.: 2006, Nocardi<strong>of</strong>orm<br />
placentitis with isolation <strong>of</strong> Amycolatopsis spp in a Florida-bred mare.J Am<br />
Vet Med Assoc. 228(8):1234-9.<br />
5. Cattoli G, Vascellari M, Corrò M, et al.: 2004, First case <strong>of</strong> equine<br />
nocardi<strong>of</strong>orm placentitis caused by Crossiella equi in Europe. Vet Rec.<br />
154(23):730-1.<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
# <strong>of</strong> Cases<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11<br />
Year<br />
Figure 1: History <strong>of</strong> NPA cases diagnosed in Kentucky
S3 - O - 05<br />
A NEW DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS-IDEXX M.BOVIS ANTIBODY TEST KIT<br />
J. Lawrence 1 , N. Djuranovic 1 , C. Egli 2<br />
1 - IDEXX Labs, Inc., Livestock and Poultry Diagnostics, Westbrook, Maine, USA<br />
2 - IDEXX Switzerland,Livestock and Poultry Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland, USA<br />
Tuberculosis, ELISA, IFN-g, SICCT, IDEXX<br />
Introduction<br />
The IDEXX M. bovis antibody test kit is an ELISA designed to<br />
detect the presence <strong>of</strong> antibody to M. bovis in bovine serum and<br />
plasma samples. This test could improve bTB detection <strong>of</strong> TB -<br />
infected animals in TB-infected herds or could be an easy, cost<br />
effective surveillance tool in TB-negative regions. The M. bovis<br />
ELISA test is currently in the approval process for the OIE<br />
registry <strong>of</strong> tests. Also, all documentation has been submitted to<br />
USDA for product licensure.<br />
2. Schiller, I., et al. 2010. Bovine tuberculosis: a review <strong>of</strong> current<br />
and emerging diagnostic techniques in view <strong>of</strong> their relevance for<br />
disease control and eradication. Transbound. Emerg. Dis.<br />
57:205–220.<br />
Material & methods<br />
Characterized serum and plasma samples were obtained from<br />
worldwide sources and were used to validate the M. bovis ELISA.<br />
Two temporal series were produced from animals exposed to M.<br />
bovis and followed over time. Positive samples from 3 different<br />
countries were obtained from either culture positive animals (n =<br />
307). Sample sets (n = 100) with varying skin or gamma<br />
interferon results were evaluated to demonstrate subsets <strong>of</strong><br />
positive animals within TB-infected herds (n = 45) and the power<br />
<strong>of</strong> combining tests to increase overall sensitivity. Negative<br />
samples (n = 1473) were obtained from 4 different countries with<br />
samples originating from negative herds, states or regions. In<br />
addition, to understand potential cross-reactivity with other<br />
Mycobacteria, samples were obtained from animals exposed to<br />
large doses <strong>of</strong> M. paratuberculosis, M. avium and M. kansasii or<br />
from a herd with a high Johne’s antibody levels.<br />
All samples were evaluated on an M. bovis antibody kit<br />
manufactured at production scale, according to the standard kit<br />
protocol. Briefly, samples and kit controls were diluted 1:50 in a<br />
sample diluent and applied to microtiter plates. After a 60-minute<br />
incubation, the plates were washed, followed by the addition <strong>of</strong><br />
an anti-bovine HRP conjugate (30-minute incubation). After<br />
another plate wash, TMB substrate was added. After color<br />
development <strong>of</strong> 15 minutes, plates were read on a<br />
spectrophotometer at 450nm. Sample optical densities were<br />
compared to those <strong>of</strong> the kit positive control to derive Sample-to<br />
Positive (S/P) ratios. Samples with S/P ratios <strong>of</strong> >/= 0.30 were<br />
considered positive for M. bovis antibodies.<br />
Results<br />
Data from the M. bovis temporal series revealed that animals can<br />
develop antibody titers within weeks <strong>of</strong> exposure and that an<br />
antibody response can be boosted after the application <strong>of</strong> a skin<br />
test. The M. bovis ELISA detected 197/307 samples from culture<br />
positive animals resulting in a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 64.2% . Using a single<br />
test method, between 71.1% and 75.6% <strong>of</strong> herds would have<br />
been detected. Combining tests resulted in an increase in herd<br />
sensitivity to between 86.7% (GIFN and ELISA) and 97.8%<br />
(GIFN, SICCT and ELISA). On negative sample sets, the M.<br />
bovis ELISA demonstrated a specificity <strong>of</strong> 98% with no cross<br />
reactivity observed on M. paratuberculosis (both experimental<br />
and field infected) or M. avium samples. Transient, low level<br />
reactivity was observed with animals inoculated with large doses<br />
<strong>of</strong> M. kansasii.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The strategic supplemental use <strong>of</strong> the IDEXX M. bovis antibody<br />
test represents a fast, easy, objective and cost effective option for<br />
use in bTB programs and can increase overall diagnostic power<br />
by detectiing subsets <strong>of</strong> infected animals missed by current<br />
methods. This test's high specificity allows for an application <strong>of</strong><br />
this test in bTB- negative regions.<br />
References<br />
1. de la Rua-Domenech, R., A. T. Goodchild, H. M. Vordermeier,<br />
R. G. Hewinson, K. H. Christiansen, and R. S. Clifton-Hadley.<br />
2006. Ante mortem diagnosis <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis in cattle: a review <strong>of</strong><br />
the tuberculin tests, γ-interferon assay and other ancillary<br />
diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci. 81:190-210.
S3 – O - 06<br />
DETECTION OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS IN THE UK<br />
Julie Peake, Christopher Finnegan, Falko Steinbach, Akbar Dastjerdi and Anna La Rocca<br />
AHVLA (Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories), MVIU (Mammalian Virus Investigation Unit), Dept <strong>of</strong> Virology, Addlestone, UK<br />
Introduction<br />
In November 2011, colleagues at the FLI using samples taken in<br />
Schmallenberg (Germany) detected a new virus. The virus<br />
identified has subsequently, but tentatively, been named<br />
Schmallenberg Virus (SBV)(1). This virus belongs to the genus<br />
Orthobunyavirus within the Bunyaviridae family. Since the end <strong>of</strong><br />
2011, traces <strong>of</strong> the virus were detected in several European<br />
countries. In the second half <strong>of</strong> January <strong>2012</strong>, the first PCR<br />
positive cases were detected in the UK, following reports <strong>of</strong><br />
clinical signs <strong>of</strong> the disease in aborted lambs from the south-east<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
RNA was extracted using Trizol® (Invitrogen) followed by<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> the acquoeus phase with the QIAamp Viral RNA<br />
mini Kit (Qiagen) and qPCR carried out with the primers<br />
described below using the QuantiTect® Virus RT-PCR kit<br />
(Qiagen). ELISA tests were carried out using the ID Screen®<br />
Schmallenberg virus Indirect ELISA (ID.VET)<br />
Results<br />
The first generation <strong>of</strong> qPCR assays based on the L segment<br />
were developed and kindly made available by FLI. In parallel, we<br />
used the virus sequence information to generate a set <strong>of</strong> primers<br />
for an AHVLA-qPCR. Shortly after, a second generation <strong>of</strong><br />
primers and probe for qPCR was available through FLI.<br />
Subsequently, LSI also marketed a kit. All these qPCRs are<br />
based on the S genome segment. We are, at present, comparing<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> Texas Red as fluorescent dye compared to FAM, in<br />
the current assays, as this could increase the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assay, especially the resolution <strong>of</strong> results close to the cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
value.<br />
Using the FLI second generation qPCR we have tested brains <strong>of</strong><br />
sheep and cattle to closely monitor the outbreak across the<br />
country. We, very interestingly, have observed that the spread <strong>of</strong><br />
the infection has been very quick across south but quite slow<br />
towards north <strong>of</strong> the UK. These observations lead us to the<br />
hypothesis that there could have been several incursions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus into the UK.<br />
Discussion and Conclusions<br />
Since mid-March, the number <strong>of</strong> positive brains from sheep has<br />
been declining and this correlates with the advancement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lambing season. However, we have also detected five positive<br />
cases in April/mid-May in England. This challenges parts <strong>of</strong> our<br />
understanding about the transmission <strong>of</strong> SBV via midges, the<br />
observation <strong>of</strong> further cases until mid-May on Channel Islands is<br />
less astonishing.<br />
A particular challenging aspect <strong>of</strong> the SBV diagnosis has been<br />
the finding that the brains <strong>of</strong> many submitted suspects with the<br />
disease case definition were negative in our PCR assay. It is<br />
considered possible that in some instances the virus has been<br />
cleared by the developing immune system <strong>of</strong> the lambs (which<br />
would be traceable via antibodies to SBV). However, a recent<br />
study suggested looking also at further tissues besides brain to<br />
detect SBV (2).<br />
Ongoing studies in our lab are accordingly looking into the<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> meconium, foetal fluid, and the dissemination <strong>of</strong><br />
SBV in brains. We are also using the recently established<br />
commercial ELISA to complement PCR results.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier<br />
H, et al. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis<br />
<strong>2012</strong> Mar;18(3):469-72.<br />
2. Bilk S, Schulze C, Fischer M, Beer M, Hilnak A, H<strong>of</strong>fmann B. Organ<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns. Vet<br />
Microbiol <strong>2012</strong> Mar 30 Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print.<br />
Tuberculosis, ELISA, IFN-g, SICCT, IDEXX
S3 - O - 07<br />
DETECTION OF WNV ENZOOTIC CIRCULATION IN HORSES WITH NEUROLOGICAL SIGNS AND IN<br />
CAPTIVE SENTINEL CHICKENS IN THE PREFECTURE OF THESSALONIKI, GREECE<br />
Chrysostomos I. Dovas 1 , Serafeim C. Chaintoutis 1 , Alexandra Chaskopoulou 2 , Nikolaos Diakakis 3 ,<br />
Ilias Bouzalas 1 , Maria Papanastassopoulou 1 , Kostas Danis 4 , Anna Papa 5 , Orestis Papadopoulos 1<br />
1<br />
Aristotle University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />
2<br />
United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, European Biological Control Laboratory, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />
3<br />
Aristotle University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Companion Animals, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />
4<br />
Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, Greece<br />
5<br />
Aristotle University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, A’ Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Microbiology, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />
WNV, detection, characterization, horses, sentinel chickens<br />
Introduction<br />
During 2010, a large outbreak <strong>of</strong> West Nile virus (WNV)<br />
infections occurred in Greece, with 262 reported human cases.<br />
Among them, 197 were diagnosed with West Nile neuroinvasive<br />
disease (WNND) and 35 patients died. The epidemic reoccurred<br />
in 2011. Laboratory methods, including RT-PCR, ELISA,<br />
microtiter plaque reduction neutralization test (micro-PRNT),<br />
indirect immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence antibody test (IFAT) and virus<br />
isolation, were used to detect WNV enzootic circulation in horses<br />
with neurological signs (passive surveillance), as well as in<br />
captive sentinel chickens (active surveillance), prior to the onset<br />
<strong>of</strong> human WNND cases in the prefecture <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Greece.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Blood samples were obtained from 17 horses with neurological<br />
signs, during the epidemic <strong>of</strong> 2010 (with the first case being<br />
reported on August 1). Furthermore, blood was collected from<br />
one horse which showed ataxia during the epidemic <strong>of</strong> 2011, on<br />
August 13. Also, in May 2011, 7 coops <strong>of</strong> 6 chickens each were<br />
placed at the edges <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki City and blood samples were<br />
collected weekly until October. In conjunction to blood sampling<br />
from chicken, mosquitoes were sampled using 28 CO 2 -baited<br />
CDC light traps.<br />
The sera obtained from the 18 horses were assayed with two IgM<br />
capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA) kits (IDEXX IgM WNV Ab Test and<br />
IDVet ID Screen West Nile IgM Capture) for the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
WNV specific IgM antibodies, sign <strong>of</strong> recent infection, as well for<br />
specific IgG antibodies, using IFAT. Plasma samples from these<br />
horses were tested with real-time RT-PCR for WNV (LSI TaqVet<br />
West Nile Virus – Dual IPC). Chicken sera were assayed by<br />
competitive ELISA (cELISA) (IDVet ID Screen West Nile<br />
Competition) for the detection <strong>of</strong> specific antibodies, and positive<br />
results were confirmed by micro-PRNT. Plasma samples from the<br />
seropositive chickens were screened using a WNV specific RT-<br />
PCR and confirmed using nested RT-PCR, employing specific<br />
primers for the WNV “Nea Santa-Greece-2010” strain, followed<br />
by sequencing <strong>of</strong> the NS3 gene for further molecular<br />
characterization. Vero cell cultures were inoculated with plasma<br />
samples from the RT-PCR positive chickens, for virus isolation.<br />
The collected mosquitoes were being counted and<br />
morphologically identified. 146 pooled samples, each one<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> 50 mosquitoes <strong>of</strong> the same species (123 Culex<br />
pipiens and 23 Culex modestus pools) were examined by three<br />
different WNV specific real-time RT-PCR protocols, as well as<br />
with the nested RT-PCR protocol,<br />
Results<br />
WNV specific antibodies were detected in all 18 horse cases <strong>of</strong><br />
2010 and 2011, while the IgG IFAT titer was high (>250) in all <strong>of</strong><br />
them. Three horses were found positive with real-time RT-PCR<br />
(Ct ~39). Regarding chickens, seroconversion was detected in 11<br />
birds (10 in Western Thessaloniki). The first seroconversion<br />
occurred on June 29, a month before the onset <strong>of</strong> human cases<br />
in the area. The seroconversion rate peaked on August 17 with 4<br />
seropositive birds and the last seroconversion occurred on<br />
September 28. WNV was detected in 2/11 seropositive chickens<br />
with RT-PCR, from samples taken one week prior to<br />
seroconversion. According to BLAST algorithm, the partial NS3<br />
sequence presented highest nucleotide sequence identity<br />
(99,73%) to the strain “Nea Santa-Greece-2010”, responsible for<br />
the 2010 Greek epidemic. The inferred partial NS3 amino acid<br />
sequence was 100% identical to that <strong>of</strong> the “Nea Santa-Greece-<br />
2010”. The strains maintained the amino acid substitution H 249 P,<br />
which may be associated with increased virulence. WNV was<br />
successfully isolated in cell cultures. Chicken serum neutralizing<br />
antibody titers to WNV ranged between 20 and 40. Culex<br />
mosquito populations peaked in mid-June, ~10 days prior to the<br />
first chicken seroconversion, remained high throughout the<br />
summer and showed a significant drop in September. The most<br />
prevalent mosquito species in both residential and agricultural<br />
areas were Culex pipiens, followed by Culex modestus Ficalbi.<br />
Only one out <strong>of</strong> the 123 Culex pipiens pools tested was found<br />
positive for the WNV “Nea Santa-Greece-2010” strain using the<br />
nested RT-PCR, while the application <strong>of</strong> all different real-time RT-<br />
PCR protocols resulted in detection <strong>of</strong> additional mosquito<br />
flaviviruses, indicating problems <strong>of</strong> detection specificity.<br />
Figure 1. Location <strong>of</strong> mosquito traps (n=28) and sentinel chicken<br />
coops for WNV surveillance in Thessaloniki, 2011. Blue bullets<br />
represent the mosquito traps, while yellow dots represent the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the 7 chicken coops. The 10 seroconverted chickens<br />
belonged to the coops No. 1, 2 and 3 (Western Thessaloniki),<br />
while one more chicken belonged to the coop No. 5, in Eastern<br />
Thessaloniki.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
With passive surveillance, 18 clinical cases <strong>of</strong> horses were<br />
detected mainly in suburban areas <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki. Unfortunately<br />
there could not be successfully used as an early warning system,<br />
given that the first human case in the prefecture <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki<br />
was recorded 15 days prior to the onset <strong>of</strong> clinical cases in<br />
horses, both in 2010 and 2011. On the contrary, with the second<br />
surveillance system, it was shown that the “Nea Santa-Greece-<br />
2010” strain became endemic in Greece, as it was detected,<br />
molecularly identified and isolated early in 2011. Most<br />
importantly, enzootic circulation <strong>of</strong> WNV was successfully<br />
detected one month prior to human cases. As a result, health<br />
authorities were informed in a timely manner and were facilitated<br />
the successful implementation <strong>of</strong> preparedness plans to protect<br />
public health and minimize the impact <strong>of</strong> the epidemic <strong>of</strong> 2011. In<br />
regards to the use <strong>of</strong> real-time RT-PCR for vector surveillance,<br />
the methods need further optimization and validation, concerning<br />
the specificity <strong>of</strong> WNV detection and results should be further<br />
confirmed by sequencing.<br />
References<br />
Danis, K, Papa, A, Papanikolaou, E, Dougas, G, Terzaki, I, Baka, A, Vrioni,<br />
G, Kapsimali, V, Tsakris, A, Kansouzidou, A, Tsiodras, S, Vakalis, N,<br />
Bonovas, S, Kremastinou, J (2011). Ongoing outbreak <strong>of</strong> West Nile virus<br />
infection in humans, Greece, July to August 2011. Eurosurveillance,<br />
16(34), pii=19951.
S3 - O - 08<br />
SCHMALLENBERGVIRUS: SEROLOGICAL STUDIES IN GERMAN HOLDINGS<br />
Horst Schirrmeier, Bernd H<strong>of</strong>fmann, Martin Beer<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany<br />
Introduction<br />
In August 2011 first indications <strong>of</strong> a previously unknown disease<br />
in dairy cattle were observed in North Rhine-Westphalia,<br />
Germany, and in the Netherlands. Fever, decreased milk<br />
production and in some cases also diarrhea were the major<br />
symptoms. In November 2011, the detection <strong>of</strong> a novel<br />
Orthobunyavirus in blood samples <strong>of</strong> acutely diseased dairy cows<br />
was reported by the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, and the the virus<br />
was named as Schmallenberg virus (SBV). Since December<br />
2011, congenital malformations were observed, initially in sheep<br />
and goats, and subsequently also in calves. A real-time RT-PCR<br />
was developed very early after the first detection, and first<br />
serological methods were established for serological studies. The<br />
first findings including investigations about the SBV-prevalence in<br />
Germany are reported.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The following methods for the detection <strong>of</strong> SBV-specific<br />
antibodies were established and used:<br />
1. serumneutralization test (SNT) in BHK-21 cells, clone<br />
CT (L164, CCLV, Insel Riems) using the cell culture<br />
isolate “Schmallenberg BH80”.<br />
2. indirect immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence in a multi-plate format<br />
with SBV-infected BHK-21 cells, using the SBVinfected<br />
cell clone BRS5 (L194, CCLV Insel Riems) as<br />
antigen matrix (Vero cells were used as an alternative<br />
cell culture).<br />
3. Indirect ELISA (in house development as well as a<br />
prototype batch <strong>of</strong> a commercial ELISA assay).<br />
Within a nationwide first monitoring study, cattle, sheep and goat<br />
sera were tested for SBV antibodies. Furthermore, sera from<br />
malformed calves and pre-colostral sera <strong>of</strong> newborn ruminants<br />
were investigated to improve diagnostic options in clinically and<br />
pathologically suspected, but PCR negative cases. A few sera<br />
from wild ungulates were also included, and in vitro crossreaction<br />
studies with other members <strong>of</strong> the Orthobunyavirus<br />
family were performed.<br />
Results & discussion<br />
SBV-specific antibodies could be detected in serum samples<br />
from cattle and sheep from all included federal states. The<br />
observed incidence was within a range <strong>of</strong> 10% to 60 %, with a<br />
single outlier <strong>of</strong> more than 90 %. Positive results were obtained<br />
most frequently in the epidemiological “core regions” in the<br />
Northwestern parts <strong>of</strong> Germany. The number <strong>of</strong> sero-reactors<br />
corresponded very well with the frequency <strong>of</strong> the notified clinical<br />
cases. However, the in-herd prevalence differed substantially and<br />
varied between single reactors and up to 80 % positive animals,<br />
and was generally higher in cattle herds than in sheep flocks.<br />
Apart from domestic ruminants, antibodies could be also detected<br />
in samples from bisons, roe deer, red deer and from one camel<br />
and lama, respectively. Furthermore, SBV-specific antibodies<br />
could be also detected in samples from PCR-negative animals as<br />
well as in sera <strong>of</strong> malformed calves without colostrum uptake.<br />
Our results will allow better insights into the epidemiolocial<br />
background <strong>of</strong> the SBV-infection, will expand the knowledge<br />
about pathogenetic mechanisms, and are able to substantiate the<br />
SBV case definition in PCR-negative animals.<br />
References<br />
H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H,<br />
Eschbaumer M, Goller KV, Wernike K, Fischer M, Breithaupt A,<br />
Mettenleiter TC, Beer M. (<strong>2012</strong>). Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe,<br />
2011, Emerg Infect Dis. <strong>2012</strong> Mar;18(3):469-72<br />
Orthobunyavirus, serology,
S3 - O - 09<br />
DIFFERENT DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS FOR A BROAD RANGE OF MACAVIRUSES AND THEIR<br />
RESERVOIR AND SUSCEPTIBLE HOSTS<br />
Christine Foerster 1 , Matthias Koenig 1 , Heinz-Juergen Thiel 1 , Jens-Ove Heckel 2<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Virology, diagnostic laboratory, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany<br />
2<br />
Zoo Landau, Germany<br />
Macavirus, malignant catarrhal fever, reservoir and susceptible host<br />
Introduction<br />
Malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) is a fatal disease <strong>of</strong> Artiodactyla,<br />
which is caused by different macaviruses within the subfamily<br />
Gammaherpesvirinae (GHV) <strong>of</strong> the family Herpesviridae. Until<br />
now there are at least 6 distinct macaviruses known to cause<br />
MCF: Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1), ovine herpesvirus 2<br />
(OvHV-2), caprine herpesvirus 2 (CpHV-2), white tailed deer-<br />
MCF-virus (MCF-WTD), an unclassified macavirus from ibex and<br />
a virus resembling alcelaphine herpesvirus 2 (AlHV-2). Other<br />
closely related viruses are the hippotragine herpesvirus 1 (HiHV-<br />
1 in roan antelope) and GHV in springbok, impala, oryx, muskox<br />
and aoudad.<br />
MCF usually occurs only sporadically. Within the framework <strong>of</strong><br />
differential diagnostics the detection <strong>of</strong> macaviruses was<br />
stimulated since the first cases <strong>of</strong> bluetongue disease were<br />
noticed in northern Europe.<br />
Typical reservoir hosts which do not develop clinical disease are<br />
sheep, goat and wildebeest. Several species <strong>of</strong> Artiodactyla are<br />
susceptible to MCF, for example bison, cattle, deer and moose.<br />
In addition pigs, goats and experimentally infected rabbits show<br />
typical clinical symptoms like fever, mucosal erosions, nasal and<br />
lacrimal discharge, corneal opacity and skin lesions.<br />
Undirected virological methods like virus propagation in cell<br />
culture and electron microscopy are not promising with regard to<br />
macaviruses. PCR is the method <strong>of</strong> choice for laboratory<br />
diagnosis. Until now most laboratories use the OvHV-2 specific<br />
PCR (Baxter et al., 1993) for samples <strong>of</strong> cattle.<br />
Objective <strong>of</strong> this work was to compare and improve the<br />
diagnostic tools for the detection <strong>of</strong> a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> potential<br />
MCF-viruses.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The competitive ELISA was clearly superior to SNA with regard<br />
to time, effort and quality <strong>of</strong> result. ELISA is recommended for<br />
routine diagnostic use, especially for reservoir hosts.<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> broadly reactive PCR methods was<br />
demonstrated by 18 positive results <strong>of</strong> wildlife samples. All 18<br />
cases led to negative results in the OvHV-2-specific PCR, but<br />
reacted positive in the PAN-Macavirus-PCR. Cloning, sequencing<br />
and phylogenetic analyses <strong>of</strong> the amplificates led to the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> CpHV-2, CpHV-2-like and BoHV-6-like macaviruses.<br />
For the first time CpHV-2-induced MCF was detected in two<br />
Banteng-cattle. Until now, CpHV-2 has been considered as a<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> MCF only in deer and moose. This implies that routine<br />
OvHV-2-specific-diagnostic in cattle is insufficient.<br />
The establishment <strong>of</strong> an OvHV-2-CpHV-2-discriminating realtime<br />
PCR allowed rapid differentiation between the two most common<br />
causative agents <strong>of</strong> MCF in Europe. This method is suitable for<br />
application in routine diagnostics <strong>of</strong> small ruminants and cattle.<br />
For the application in wildlife samples the conventional PCR is<br />
more suited, because primer pairs were selected for a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> macaviruses and the conventional PCR appeared to be<br />
more sensitive.<br />
References<br />
1. Baxter, S. I., Pow, I., Bridgen, A. and Reid, H. W. (1993). PCR detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sheep-associated agent <strong>of</strong> malignant catarrhal fever. Arch Virol 132<br />
(1-2), 145-59.<br />
2. Russell, G. C., Stewart, J. P. and Haig, D. M. (2009). Malignant<br />
catarrhal fever: A review. Vet J 179 (3), 324-35.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Two new conventional PCR-methods and an OvHV-2-CpHV-2-<br />
discriminating realtime PCR were established, which allowed to<br />
detect a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> macaviruses. They were compared to<br />
the commonly used OvHV-2-specific PCR. Amplified fragments<br />
were cloned, sequenced and used for phylogenetic analyses.<br />
Furthermore two antibody-test-systems, ELISA and serum<br />
neutralisation assay (SNA), were compared to each other.<br />
Samples <strong>of</strong> 276 wild and zoo animals, comprising 54 different<br />
genera <strong>of</strong> the family Bovidae, Cervidae, Camelidae and<br />
Giraffidae, 230 goats and 58 sheep were examined.<br />
Results<br />
39 cases out <strong>of</strong> 276 wild ruminants (14 %) led to a positive result<br />
in at least one procedure. In approximately half <strong>of</strong> the samples<br />
(19) OvHV-2 was identified, in 18 CpHV-2 or CpHV-2 like virus.<br />
Samples <strong>of</strong> one waterbuck contained sequences related to<br />
BoHV-6. 19 <strong>of</strong> 39 macavirus-positive animals showed MCF like<br />
disease.<br />
CpHV-2 was identified in conjunction with two cases <strong>of</strong> MCF in<br />
Banteng cattle.<br />
5 out <strong>of</strong> 230 goats (2 %) showed MCF like symptoms and 4 <strong>of</strong><br />
them also pathological and histological signs <strong>of</strong> MCF. In all<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> these animals OvHV-2 could be demonstrated.<br />
Samples <strong>of</strong> 92 (42 %) goats obtained positive results in at least<br />
one PCR method. Interestingly single and also double infection <strong>of</strong><br />
OvHV-2 and CpHV-2 were found.<br />
In contrast to the goats only OvHV-2 was found in 27 sheep<br />
samples (47 %).<br />
Realtime PCR was able to detect OvHV-2 and CpHV-2 in all<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> MCF-diseased animals. In latently infected animals high<br />
cycle treshold values were found.<br />
In some reservoir hosts antibodies were found but no viral DNA.<br />
33 <strong>of</strong> 59 animals (56 %) were found positive via ELISA, but<br />
negative by SNA, while only one animal (1,6 %) was estimated<br />
positive by SNA and negative via ELISA.
S3 - O - 10<br />
DIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF SUID HERPESVIRUS 1 INFECTION IN WILD BOAR<br />
Adolf Steinrigl, Sandra Revilla-Fernández, Eveline Wodak, Zoltán Bagó, Friedrich Schmoll<br />
AGES Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Mödling, Austria<br />
SuHV-1, wild boar, prevalence, molecular characterization<br />
Introduction<br />
Many infectious diseases that are strictly controlled in livestock<br />
may remain unnoticed in wild animals, posing the risk <strong>of</strong> entering<br />
domestic animal populations with potentially devastating<br />
consequences. Suid herpesvirus 1 (SuHV-1), the causative agent<br />
<strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease (AD), was eradicated from domestic pig<br />
populations in many European countries, including Austria. At the<br />
same time, SuHV-1 infection is common in European wild boar,<br />
as shown by a number <strong>of</strong> studies, reporting detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />
DNA or antibodies in wild boar (1). An additional indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
SuHV-1 presence in wild boar are occasional cases <strong>of</strong> AD in<br />
hunting dogs, usually in close connection to hunting events (2).<br />
Recently, we reported about the first detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />
Austrian wild boar and the molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />
field isolates from wild boar and hunting dogs (3).<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the Wild Animal Survey 2011, a nationwide study<br />
that was partly financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Health, additional sera and tissue samples from Austrian wild<br />
boar were collected and analysed, with the aim to provide a<br />
representative estimate <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> both, SuHV-1 DNA<br />
and antibodies, in Austrian wild boar. This work shows the results<br />
<strong>of</strong> this survey and reflects our experiences with detection and<br />
molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in wild boar.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Wild boar tissues and sera were sampled according to a survey<br />
design that was based on recent wild boar hunting bag statistics.<br />
Anti-SuHV-1 gB ELISA, real-time PCR (qPCR), amplification and<br />
sequencing <strong>of</strong> the SuHV-1 glycoprotein C coding region,<br />
phylogenetic analysis and virus isolation were performed as<br />
described previously (3).<br />
Results<br />
From April 2011 to January <strong>2012</strong>, tissues from 298 wild boars<br />
were sampled, corresponding to 78% <strong>of</strong> the scheduled sample<br />
size for the whole country. Wild boar sera <strong>of</strong> sufficient amount<br />
and quality were available from 259 animals. Results <strong>of</strong><br />
serological and virological screening are shown in Table 1. All<br />
qPCR positive wild boars were adult females at 2-4 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> them was also serologically positive, while the other two<br />
animals were seronegative.<br />
Table 1: Results <strong>of</strong> serological (ELISA) and virological (qPCR)<br />
screening <strong>of</strong> Austrian wild boars<br />
Samples Samples Prevalence<br />
tested positive<br />
ELISA 259 59 22.8%<br />
qPCR 298 3 1.0%<br />
Virus was successfully isolated from one <strong>of</strong> the qPCR-positive,<br />
yet seronegative, wild boars: tissue homogenate from a qPCRpositive<br />
tonsil was inoculated onto PK15 cells, resulting in<br />
massive cytopathic effect within 24 hours post inoculation. An<br />
attempt to isolate virus from the other two qPCR positive animals<br />
was unsuccessful. Phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 gC<br />
sequences amplified from the three qPCR positive wild boars<br />
sampled in 2011 showed that all three animals hosted virus that<br />
was identical in gC sequence and belonged to one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
previously described lineages <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 (3), which are currently<br />
present in Austria (Figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Neighbour Joining tree, based on a 639 bp alignment <strong>of</strong><br />
the SuHV-1 partial gC coding region. Sequences were amplified<br />
from wild boars (WB), hunting dogs (HD) and from a domestic pig<br />
(DP). Year <strong>of</strong> isolation is in brackets. Numbers along the<br />
branches indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> 1000 bootstrap replicates.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The presented study confirms the presence <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />
Austrian wild boar. SuHV-1 seroprevalence detected during the<br />
Wild Animal Survey 2011 was lower than that previously<br />
described (3), which is probably due to the more representative<br />
sampling strategy applied for the current study. In contrast to the<br />
high numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars with detectable SuHV-1 antibodies,<br />
SuHV-1 DNA was detected by qPCR in only a few animals.<br />
Furthermore, Cq-values <strong>of</strong> qPCR-positive tissue pools or<br />
individual organs were relatively high (30 - 38 Cq), indicating a<br />
low viral load in these tissues. This is also supported by our<br />
previous observation <strong>of</strong> weak immunohistochemistry signals in<br />
qPCR positive tissues (3) and by the fact that virus isolation was<br />
positive in a single case only. In summary, our results indicate<br />
that most SuHV-1 infected wild boars harbour virus in a latent<br />
form, whereas only a small proportion <strong>of</strong> infected wild boars is<br />
actually shedding virus and may infect other susceptible animals.<br />
This is also the most likely explanation for the relatively rare<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> AD in hunting dogs, despite rising numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars<br />
in many European countries and the frequent involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
hunting dogs in wild boar hunting. Despite the fact that only few<br />
potentially virus shedding wild boars were found in this study,<br />
direct contact between wild boars and domestic pigs could result<br />
in SuHV-1 transmission. Feeding <strong>of</strong> wild boar intestines to<br />
domestic animals, especially pigs, dogs and cats, is another<br />
reasonable possibility <strong>of</strong> transmission and must be strictly<br />
discouraged.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was financially supported in part by the Austrian<br />
Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. The excellent technical assistance <strong>of</strong><br />
the laboratory staff <strong>of</strong> the Departments for Molecular Biology,<br />
Virology and Electron Microscopy, and Pathology is<br />
acknowledged.<br />
References<br />
1. Müller T, Hahn EC, Tottewitz F, Kramer M, Klupp BG, Mettenleiter TC,<br />
Freuling C (2011). Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: a global perspective.<br />
Arch. Virol., 156, 1691-705.<br />
2. Cay AB, Letellier C (2009). Isolation <strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease virus from<br />
two hunting dogs in Belgium after hunting wild boar. Vlaams<br />
Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 78, 194-195.<br />
3. Steinrigl A, Revilla-Fernández S, Kolodziejek J, Wodak E, Bagó Z,<br />
Nowotny N, Schmoll F, Köfer J (2011). Detection and molecular<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> Suid herpesvirus type 1 in Austrian wild boar and<br />
hunting dogs. Vet Microbiol., Dec 30. [Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print]
S3 - O - 11<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN ® SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS INDIRECT ELISA<br />
P. Pourquier, 1 , C. Loic, 1 , S. Zientara, 2 , E. Breard, 2 , C. Sailleau, 2 , C. Viarouge, 2 , A.-B.Cay, 3 , N. De Regge, 3<br />
1<br />
IDvet, Montpellier, France<br />
2 ANSES Maisons-Alfort, France<br />
Introduction<br />
Schmallenberg virus (SBV) is the name given to a vectortransmitted<br />
orthobunyavirus related to Shamonda virus, initially<br />
reported in November 2011 to cause foetal congenital<br />
malformations and stillbirths in cattle, sheep, and goats. The<br />
virus has since been detected in Germany, the Netherlands,<br />
Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Italy, Spain and the United<br />
Kingdom.<br />
Serological testing is essential in order to study and control this<br />
new emerging disease. While SBV specific antibodies can be<br />
detected by virus neutralization tests and indirect<br />
immun<strong>of</strong>luoresence, these techniques are time-consuming, not<br />
suitable for high-throughput, and do not <strong>of</strong>fer standardized result<br />
interpretation.<br />
Available as <strong>of</strong> March <strong>2012</strong>, the ID Screen ®<br />
Schmallenberg<br />
virus Indirect ELISA is the first ELISA developed for SBV<br />
diagnosis. The test allows for the detection <strong>of</strong> SBV antibodies in<br />
ruminant serum and plasma. It is a rapid, standardized assay<br />
which is automatable and therefore suited to high throughput<br />
testing.<br />
This study presents validation data for this test. Data will be<br />
added for any second generation tests developed by IDvet<br />
between March and June <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Material & methods<br />
- The ID Screen ® Schmallenberg virus Indirect ELISA was<br />
performed as per manufacturer’s specifications.<br />
- Specificity was studied using panels <strong>of</strong> sera collected prior to<br />
2010.<br />
- Sensitivity was evaluated on sera tested positive with the virus<br />
neutralization test (VNT).<br />
- An experimental infection was performed in April <strong>2012</strong> in order<br />
to evaluate the seroconversion response in cattle, sheep and<br />
goats.<br />
Results & Discussion<br />
Preliminary validation studies indicate excellent test specificity<br />
and high correlation with other serological techniques, making the<br />
the ID Screen ® Schmallenberg virus Indirect ELISA an efficient<br />
tool for disease surveillance and epidemiological studies.<br />
3 CODA-CERVA, Department <strong>of</strong> Viral Diseases, Brussels, Belgium<br />
Schmallenberg virus, serology, ELISA
Oral presentations<br />
“New techniques in bacteriology,<br />
parasitology and pathology”<br />
(4 th session)
S4 - K - 01<br />
MALDI-TOF AND OTHER NEW DIAGNOSTIC<br />
Markus Kostrzewa<br />
Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bioanalytical development, Bremen, Germany<br />
Microorganism identification, FT-IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, MALDI-TOF MS<br />
Introduction – the “status quo”<br />
Since more than one hundred years, identification <strong>of</strong><br />
microorganisms mainly is performed by methods investigating<br />
their phenotypic characteristics. Gram stain together with<br />
microscopy in combination gives a first quick hint about identity.<br />
The screening <strong>of</strong> series <strong>of</strong> tests for biochemical capabilities is<br />
used to generate a pattern which is more or less species specific.<br />
Although these tests now have been automated for the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the most prevalent microorganisms, the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
biochemical tests is limited, in particular for organisms with few<br />
characteristic biochemical features like Gram negative nonfermenting<br />
bacteria <strong>of</strong> anaerobes. Even worse is the situation for<br />
rare bacteria, mycobacteria or fungi where mainly labourintensive<br />
manual methods like API are applied for identification.<br />
Therefore, there is an urgent need for modern automated<br />
methods for identification which can be introduced in routine<br />
laboratories to shorten time-to-result and decrease the overall<br />
costs <strong>of</strong> the laboratories. Promising approaches appearing in the<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> molecular biology, optical technologies and mass<br />
spectrometry have appeared through the recent years and are on<br />
the way to revolutionize microbial analysis.<br />
Methods based on molecular biology have already been<br />
introduced in many laboratories, mainly PCR based tests to<br />
screen for dedicated microorganisms, e.g. food pathogens. While<br />
having the advantage <strong>of</strong> high sensitivity and short analysis time<br />
one drawback <strong>of</strong> PCR based tests is that they generally need a<br />
pre-assumption which microorganism is searched for, i.e. a<br />
dedicated primer design. To apply DNA analysis to broad species<br />
identification, PCR typically is coupled with subsequent sequence<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> the amplicon. Sequencing <strong>of</strong> the 16S rDNA<br />
region nowadays is regarded the gold standard for species<br />
identification. Nevertheless, 16S rDNA sequencing has never<br />
made it to the routine but is mainly a second- or third-line method<br />
for cases where other methods have failed. Reasons are the high<br />
costs, elaborate sample handling, and PCR-related<br />
contamination risk. Further, in quite a number <strong>of</strong> cases,<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is not<br />
sufficient for the discrimination <strong>of</strong> closely related species and<br />
further gene sequences have to be analysed, increasing time to<br />
result, costs and labour, significantly. Novel next generation<br />
sequencing technologies might change the position <strong>of</strong><br />
sequencing in future by their enormous throughput capability, but<br />
today they are still expensive and labour-intensive research tools.<br />
The upcoming alternatives<br />
Vibrational spectroscopy<br />
Optical technologies have been shown to be powerful for<br />
microorganism identification as well as for analyses on the<br />
subspecies level. These techniques are based on a molecular<br />
fingerprint <strong>of</strong> the entire biomass, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids,<br />
nucleic acids. Analyses are not depending on reagent kits, labels<br />
or drugs, and these technologies are applicable to a broad<br />
spectrum <strong>of</strong> organisms.<br />
Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive optical technique,<br />
based on scattering <strong>of</strong> light by molecules, the so called “Raman<br />
effect”. The atoms in a molecule move in so called vibrational<br />
modes. When light, i.e. a photon, and a molecule interact, some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the energy <strong>of</strong> the photon can be transferred to the molecule.<br />
Thereby, one <strong>of</strong> the vibrational modes in the molecule is excited.<br />
The energy <strong>of</strong> the scattered photon is reduced by the exact<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> energy received by the molecule. The energy required<br />
to excite a molecular vibration is exactly defined and depends on<br />
the masses <strong>of</strong> the atoms involved in the vibration, on the type <strong>of</strong><br />
chemical bonds between these atoms, on the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
molecule and on interactions with its environment and other<br />
molecules. The spectrum <strong>of</strong> the scattered light is used as a<br />
pattern to identify microbes.<br />
In contrast, Fourier-transformation infrared spectroscopy uses<br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> an infrared light spectrum (not a single wavelength)<br />
to create a fingerprint <strong>of</strong> the whole cell composition. Mainly<br />
transmission <strong>of</strong> the light is used to create the characteristic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The first deviation <strong>of</strong> the transmission pr<strong>of</strong>ile spectrum is<br />
generated and sophisticated mathematical algorithms are used to<br />
identify strains by matching against a database or to build<br />
relational dendrograms for classification.<br />
Restrictions <strong>of</strong> the optical technologies is mainly that they require<br />
a strict standardization <strong>of</strong> cultivation conditions (time, media,<br />
temperature) as these are influencing the cell content and<br />
thereby the optical fingerprint. The speed <strong>of</strong> the analyses is also<br />
counteracted by the fact that a pure culture is required (i.e. <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
no analysis from primary culture can be performed).<br />
Mass spectrometry<br />
Some technological approaches for identification and further<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> microorganisms based on mass spectrometry may<br />
have the most impact on microbial characterization in the near<br />
future. One <strong>of</strong> these approaches is based on a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
molecular biology and electrospray time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass<br />
spectrometry (ESI-TOF MS). In a first step, several target regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the DNA from the unknown microorganism are amplified with<br />
generic primer pairs. This is creating a set <strong>of</strong> amplification<br />
products with specific molecular masses. Subsequently, the PCR<br />
products are purified with a magnetic bead based system and<br />
then injected in liquid phase into the ESI-TOF mass<br />
spectrometer. During the ionization process, the two DNA strands<br />
<strong>of</strong> an amplicon are separated. The mass <strong>of</strong> both DNA strands is<br />
measured in the ESI-TOF very accurately. From the combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accurate masses <strong>of</strong> the both pairing strands the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the polynucleotides (i.e. the number <strong>of</strong> A, C, G,<br />
and T, respectively) can be determined. The projection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
base compositions <strong>of</strong> the selected PCR products into a database<br />
is used for the identification <strong>of</strong> an organism. The more PCR<br />
products are analysed, the more accurate/discriminative the<br />
identification can be. One advantage <strong>of</strong> this technology is that in<br />
parallel to species identification also other characteristics, e.g.<br />
resistance genes or virulence factors, can be detected. On the<br />
other hand, this approach still relies on a relatively complex<br />
(although in parts automated) workflow, and both the instrument<br />
as well as consumable costs are significant.<br />
The second, currently most successful and promising mass<br />
spectrometry technology is matrix-assisted laserdesorption/ionization<br />
time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-<br />
TOF MS). In contrast to electrospray ionization the MALDI<br />
process (generating the ions measured in the TOF analyser) is<br />
performed from a solid sample. For this, the sample is deposited<br />
on a target plate, overlaid with the so called matrix, generally an<br />
organic acid related to cinnamic acid, which co-crystalizes with<br />
the sample. This matrix supports the evaporation <strong>of</strong> the sample<br />
and its ionization after absorption <strong>of</strong> the energy <strong>of</strong> a pulsed laser<br />
beam. One advantage <strong>of</strong> this technology is that the sample can<br />
be easily prepared <strong>of</strong>fline before measurement and then<br />
transported or stored until measurement.<br />
For one molecular biology based approach, MALDI-TOF MS is<br />
used to detect specific RNA fragments generated by PCR<br />
followed by transcription <strong>of</strong> both DNA strands and the cleavage <strong>of</strong><br />
the transcripts by RNAses. The exact masses <strong>of</strong> the fragments<br />
can be used as pattern for identification and typing <strong>of</strong><br />
microorganisms. Alternatively, minisequencing/primer extension<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific regions after PCR amplification, followed by mass<br />
determination in a MALDI-TOF MS, has been shown to have<br />
some potential for typing or resistance detection.<br />
While none <strong>of</strong> these DNA based mass spectrometry approaches<br />
made it to routine yet, MALDI-TOF MS whole cell protein pr<strong>of</strong>iling<br />
has entered many clinical and veterinary microbiology<br />
laboratories, already. This MALDI-TOF fingerprinting is based on<br />
the specific pattern <strong>of</strong> high abundant proteins <strong>of</strong> microbial cells<br />
which can be measured quickly and accurately by MALDI-TOF<br />
mass spectrometry. Sample preparation is very simple, fast and<br />
cheap: A small amount <strong>of</strong> a bacterial colony is transferred to a<br />
position on a MALDI sample target and smeared on it as a thin<br />
film. More robust cells can be broken by a short extraction with
acid and organic solvent. Then a droplet <strong>of</strong> matrix solution is<br />
added. Thereby, the cells are destructed, the protein content gets<br />
released and is embedded into the matrix crystals which are<br />
forming after solvent evaporation. During the subsequent MALDI-<br />
TOF analysis the most abundant proteins, in particular ribosomal<br />
proteins, are detected as a characteristic molecular pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
(fingerprint). This pattern then is compared with the pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />
stored in a database. Identification is done based on highest<br />
similarity and a minimum identity score. The whole process, from<br />
sample preparation to identification, can be as fast as ten<br />
minutes for a single sample/colony, less than one hour for about<br />
one hundred samples. For difficult to prepare microorganisms like<br />
actinomycetes, fungi, or mycobacteria special protocols are<br />
available which allow also their analysis with high success rate.<br />
Dependance on cultivation conditions is generally low. Thereby,<br />
this is one <strong>of</strong> the broadest applicable technologies for microbial<br />
identification. MALDI-TOF fingerprinting is already used in many<br />
clinical and veterinary laboratories, frequently as the first-line<br />
routine identification method. Its accuracy has been reported in<br />
various publications. Extensive commercial databases are<br />
available, but also alternative or supplementary laboratoryspecific<br />
libraries can be established. Recent developments in the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> direct specimen analysis, epidemiology, virulence<br />
typing, and resistance determination will make the technology<br />
even more valuable for the clinical microbiology.<br />
Conclusions<br />
New technologies for microorganism identification and<br />
characterization are no more on the horizon, they are on the<br />
playground. In the near future it can be expected that a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> molecular and spectroscopic/spectrometric<br />
technologies will substitute most <strong>of</strong> phenotypic/biochemical<br />
assays, increasing accuracy, efficiency and speed <strong>of</strong> the clinical<br />
microbiology laboratory.
S4 - O - 01<br />
SUITABILITY OF RECOMBINANT PROTEINS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LEPTOSPIROSIS IN PIGS<br />
Ripp, Ulrike 1,2 , Truyen, Uwe 2 , Homeier, Timo 2<br />
1<br />
Synlab.vet Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany<br />
2<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig, Germany<br />
Porcine leptospirosis, LipL32, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
Leptospirosis is a widespread disease in the world with a high<br />
zoonotic potential. The momentary gold standard is the<br />
microscopic agglutination test (MAT). The specificity seems to be<br />
good, but the sensitivity is controversially discussed. It is lacking<br />
as a non-objective test procedure. Additionally, the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
antibodies depends on the used serovar panel. Apart from the<br />
sensitivity, there is a risk <strong>of</strong> laboratory infection, as the leptospires<br />
used in the MAT have to be alive.<br />
Therefore, current research focuses on the development <strong>of</strong> an<br />
ELISA for the serological diagnosis <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis. Whole-cell<br />
based ELISA did not provide the desired results in sensitivity and<br />
specificity. Recombinant proteins, especially those that are only<br />
expressed in pathogenic leptospires, seem to be a more<br />
promising agent as an antigen. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to find<br />
a serovar-independent antigen which can be used in a screening<br />
ELISA in comparison to the MAT.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Microscopic agglutination test (MAT):<br />
8 serovars (L. Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Pomona,<br />
Tarassovi, Sejroe, Copenhageni, Saxkoebing) were used in the<br />
MAT panel. The highest titer where there were still less than 50%<br />
<strong>of</strong> free leptospires to be seen in the dark-field-microscopy, was<br />
the endtiter.<br />
Samples with a titer ≥ 1:100 were considered positive.<br />
Porcine serum samples were screened at dilutions <strong>of</strong> 1:50, 1:100<br />
and 1:200. Samples that were still positive at 1:200 were further<br />
diluted.<br />
ELISA:<br />
The recombinant protein LipL32 was used as antigen. It is highly<br />
conserved among the pathogenic serovars <strong>of</strong> Leptospira (1) and<br />
is not expressed in apathogenic leptospires. LipL32 contributes to<br />
a large amount <strong>of</strong> the outer membrane proteins <strong>of</strong> leptospires. It<br />
has already been tested in an ELISA for human, canine and<br />
bovine leptospirosis (2,3).<br />
Flat-bottom microtiter plates were coated with LipL32 and<br />
incubated over night at 4°C. The optimal antigen concentration<br />
was determined by checkerboard titration. The range was from<br />
1,17 g to 0,55 ng / well.<br />
The plate was blocked the next day with skim milk and again<br />
incubated over night at 4°C. After washing the plate, serum was<br />
added at a dilution <strong>of</strong> 1:100 and incubated for 1 hour at room<br />
temperature on a shaker. After the next washing step, the<br />
conjugate (a goat anti-pig antibody that was conjugated to<br />
horseradish-peroxidase) was added. The plate was incubated for<br />
1 hour at room temperature on a shaker, washed, and the<br />
substrate (TMB) was added. The reaction was stopped after 5<br />
minutes with 0,5M H 2 SO 4 and read at 450/630nm.<br />
Control sera:<br />
The positive control serum was gained from a pig that was<br />
vaccinated 3 times in intervals <strong>of</strong> 2 weeks with 10 9 CFU (Colony<br />
forming units) <strong>of</strong> formalin inactivated Leptospira Pomona.<br />
The serum <strong>of</strong> a specific pathogen free pig (that was negative in<br />
the MAT, too) was used as negative control.<br />
Results<br />
Optimum antigen concentration:<br />
The titration <strong>of</strong> LipL32 did not show a plateau with additional<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> OD values. Changes <strong>of</strong> the conjugate and serum<br />
dilutions as well as different blocking agents and microtiter plates<br />
did not improve the titration curve. Hence, the antigen dilution<br />
with the lowest OD for the negative control and still the biggest<br />
difference between the ODs <strong>of</strong> the negative and positive control<br />
was chosen. Weak positive samples were tested to verify that<br />
they could still be detected.<br />
It is becoming apparent that MAT negative porcine serum<br />
samples can be differentiated from MAT positive samples with the<br />
recombinant protein LipL32.<br />
OD‐value<br />
1,600<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
0,800<br />
0,600<br />
0,400<br />
0,200<br />
0,000<br />
0 1 2 3<br />
1= positive, 2 = weak positive, 3= negative sera<br />
Figure 1: 27 porcine sera with different MAT titers tested in the<br />
LipL32-ELISA<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Leptospirosis is a livestock disease with a serious impact on<br />
public health. It is important to find a reliable, inexpensive and<br />
hazardous-free diagnostic test. This study’s target is to test the<br />
possible utilisation <strong>of</strong> the recombinant protein LipL32 in an ELISA<br />
for porcine leptospirosis.<br />
LipL32 seems to be a potential candidate for an ELISA. The<br />
serum samples tested until now show different OD values,<br />
depending on having negative or positive MAT titers. There is a<br />
correlation <strong>of</strong> the qualitative results (positive / negative), but there<br />
seems to be no correlation <strong>of</strong> the quantitative results (MAT titers /<br />
OD values). Figure 1 shows that samples with weak positive MAT<br />
titers (1:100 / 1:200) are in the same range <strong>of</strong> OD values as<br />
samples with strong positive MAT titers (≥ 1:800).<br />
The goal <strong>of</strong> the ELISA wasn’t to establish a replicate <strong>of</strong> MAT<br />
titers, but to give reliable results whether an animal has been<br />
exposed to leptospires or not.<br />
The sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong> the ELISA have to be examined<br />
in further experiments.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors thank Dr. K. Nöckler and E. Luge, Federal Institute<br />
for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany for assistance with the<br />
MAT.<br />
References<br />
1. Haake,D.A., Chao,G. Zuerner, R.L. Barnett, J.K. Barnett, D., Mazel, M.,<br />
Matsunga, J., Levett, P.N., Bolin, C.A., (2000). The leptospiral major outer<br />
membrane protein LipL32 is a lipoprotein expressed during mammalian<br />
infection. Infect. Immun. 68, 2276-2285<br />
2. Dey,S., Madhan Mohan,C. (2004). Recombinant LipL32 antigen-based<br />
single serum dilution ELISA for detection <strong>of</strong> canine leptospirosis. Vet.<br />
Microbiol.103, 99-106.<br />
3. Bomfim, M.R.Q., Ko, A., Cota Koury, M. (2005). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recombinant LipL32 in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the<br />
serodiagnosis <strong>of</strong> bovine leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 109, 89-94
S4 - O - 02<br />
BIOLOG GENERATION III, MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION/IONISATION TIME-OF-FLIGHT<br />
(MALDI-TOF) MASS SPECTROMETRY AND 16S rRNA GENE SEQUENCING FOR THE<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIA OF VETERINARY INTEREST<br />
Peter Wragg 1 , Luke Randall 2 , Adrian Whatmore 3<br />
1 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Laboratory Services Department, Penrith, United Kingdom<br />
2,3 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Department <strong>of</strong> Bacteriology, Weybridge, United Kingdom<br />
Biolog, Maldi-ToF, 16S rRNA<br />
Introduction<br />
The veterinary bacteriologist is currently presented with a wide<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> technologies <strong>of</strong>fering potential solutions to problems in<br />
the identification <strong>of</strong> bacteria.<br />
16S rRNA sequencing is perhaps the most familiar <strong>of</strong> the genomic<br />
approaches. Nonetheless, genomic methods are not without<br />
limitations and may suffer similar database validation issues to<br />
phenotypic systems (1,2). Automated or semi-automated<br />
metabolic methods have developed rapidly in recent years, with<br />
multi-analyte systems <strong>of</strong>fering extended databases, although<br />
frequently less well populated with veterinary taxa. Biolog’s<br />
Generation III identification system employs a novel method <strong>of</strong><br />
detecting substrate utilisation and an extensive database,<br />
including veterinary isolates (3). Matrix-assisted laser desorption/<br />
ionization time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) has<br />
become widely recognised as one <strong>of</strong> the most adaptable <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chemotaxonomic methods (4). Veterinary strains are wellrepresented<br />
on manufacturer’s databases. Database<br />
enhancement initiatives are ongoing for all three technologies in a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> research facilities.<br />
This study was designed to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> the above<br />
methods for the identification <strong>of</strong> a limited but typical range <strong>of</strong><br />
referral isolates <strong>of</strong> veterinary significance (n=66) by comparison to<br />
partial 16S rRNA DNA sequencing, with a view to indicating<br />
potential suitability as a ’front-line’ identification tool.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The isolates used in this study consisted <strong>of</strong> field strains referred<br />
for determinative bacteriology by Regional Laboratories <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA),<br />
although a number <strong>of</strong> strains from the National Culture Type<br />
Collection (NCTC, Colindale, London) and the American Type<br />
Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia) were also included.<br />
Each field isolate had previously been identified by conventional<br />
biochemical approaches. Cultures were prepared on 5% sheep<br />
blood-Columbia agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), incubated either<br />
aerobically or in 7.5% carbon dioxide at 37 °C for 18-24h,<br />
according to cultural characteristics, and tested blind by each <strong>of</strong><br />
the three methods as follows.<br />
Biolog Generation 3:<br />
Inocula were prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions<br />
(Biolog, Hayward, CA). Growth patterns were measured using a<br />
Microstation reader and analysed using Microlog s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time <strong>of</strong> flight mass<br />
spectrometry (MALDI-TOF):<br />
Samples were prepared using standard Bruker protocols (Bruker<br />
Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) (4) and analysed using a<br />
Bruker Aut<strong>of</strong>lex II machine. Spectra were analysed with MALDI<br />
Biotyper s<strong>of</strong>tware version 2.0.10.0 in comparison with reference<br />
spectra (MALDI Biotyper reference library version 3).<br />
16S rRNA gene sequencing:<br />
Ribosomal RNA sequence identification was based on a minimum<br />
600bp sequence corresponding to the V2-V4 regions <strong>of</strong> the gene.<br />
Sequences were compared with both NCBI and RDP databases<br />
with criteria <strong>of</strong> a >99% similarity to the type strain <strong>of</strong> a<br />
taxonomically valid species being used as identification criteria for<br />
species. If matches were below 99% or there were matches >99%<br />
to multiple taxonomically valid species identification was given to<br />
the genus level only.<br />
In the majority <strong>of</strong> cases, referral for determinative bacteriology<br />
within AHVLA requires identification to species level. A scoring<br />
system was devised, using either 16S sequencing or the<br />
NCTC/ATCC identity as the ‘gold standard’. Where sequencing<br />
lacked species information for comparison, identification was<br />
scored at genus level only in all methods.<br />
Results<br />
Scores <strong>of</strong> 3, 1 and 0 were assigned for identifications to species,<br />
genus and ’ no identification’, respectively.<br />
Table 1 summarises the performance <strong>of</strong> each system.<br />
Table 1: Performance <strong>of</strong> identification systems<br />
Numbers <strong>of</strong> strains identified Biolog MALDI 16S sequencing<br />
To genus 28 30 29<br />
To species 27 27 36<br />
No ID 11 9 1<br />
Incorrect genus 0 0 0<br />
Incorrect species 0 0 0<br />
Overall score 109 111 137<br />
Scores for MALDI and Biolog may have improved if alternative<br />
phenotypic data had been considered in determining true identity.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Scores for MALDI and Biolog were broadly comparable, although<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> taxa were identified more specifically by particular<br />
techniques. A number <strong>of</strong> isolates proved refractory either by<br />
MALDI-TOF or Biolog, although local enhancements to databases<br />
would minimise these occurrences.<br />
Whilst each methodology <strong>of</strong>fers unique advantages, other factors<br />
which require consideration are the accessibility <strong>of</strong> the technology,<br />
including start-up and running costs, the quality and ease <strong>of</strong><br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer’s database and the<br />
requirement for centralisation <strong>of</strong> resources and expertise which<br />
may be implicit in the choice <strong>of</strong> technique.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank the AHVLA Regional Laboratories at Bury St Edmunds,<br />
Starcross and Sutton Bonington for provision <strong>of</strong> field strains, Mark<br />
Koylass and the Central Sequencing Unit at AHVLA Weybridge.<br />
References<br />
1.Janda, J.M., Abbott, S.L. (2007). 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial<br />
identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils and pitfalls. J. Clin.<br />
Microbiol. 45: 2761-2764.<br />
2. Woo, P.C., Lau, S.K., Teng, J.L., Tse, H., Yuen, K-Y. (2008) Then and<br />
now: use <strong>of</strong> 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and<br />
discovery <strong>of</strong> novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin.<br />
Microbiol. Infect., 14: 908-934.<br />
3. Morgan, M.C., Boyette, M., G<strong>of</strong>orth, C., Sperry, K. V., Greene, S. R.,<br />
(2009). Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Biolog Omnilog Identification System and 16S<br />
ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for accuracy in identification <strong>of</strong> atypical<br />
bacteria <strong>of</strong> clinical origin. J. Microbiol. Meth. 79: 336-343.<br />
4. Eigner, U., Holfelder, M., Oberdorfer, K. et al. (2009) Performance <strong>of</strong> a<br />
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry<br />
system for the identification <strong>of</strong> bacterial isolates in the clinical routine<br />
laboratory. Clin. Lab., 55: 289-296.
S4 - O - 03<br />
EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF PEPTIDE COCKTAILS IN THE INTERFERON<br />
GAMMA ASSAY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CATTLE<br />
Björn Schröder 1 , Roland Hardegger 1 , Marcus G. Doherr 2 , Jean-Louis Moyen 3 , Eamonn Gormley 4 and<br />
Alex J. Raeber 1<br />
1 Prionics AG, Schlieren, Switzerland, 2 Vetsuisse Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Bern, Switzerland, 3 Laboratoire Départemental d’Analyse et de Recherche,<br />
Coulounieix-Chamiers, France, 4 University College Dublin, Ireland,<br />
Tuberculosis, Bovigam, defined antigens, peptide cocktail<br />
Introduction<br />
Cattle infected with bovine tuberculosis (bTB) still represent a<br />
serious regulatory and health concern in a many countries. For<br />
more than two decades, eradication programs for bTB have<br />
relied on early detection and removal <strong>of</strong> infected cattle using the<br />
intradermal skin test as primary test and the in vitro interferon<br />
gamma (IFN-) assay as an ancillary assay. The interferon<br />
gamma assay is generally considered to be more sensitive than<br />
the skin test while the specificity is slightly lower. To increase the<br />
specificity <strong>of</strong> the IFN- assay, defined mycobacterial antigens<br />
such as ESAT-6 and CFP-10 have been evaluated as alternative<br />
stimulation antigens in blood cultures and have shown promising<br />
results although sensitivities were slightly lower than with<br />
tuberculin stimulation. Combining additional specific<br />
mycobacterial antigens with ESAT-6 and CFP-10 has been<br />
proposed to bring the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> antigen cocktails to the levels<br />
obtained with tuberculin and at the same time achieving<br />
specificities comparable to the skin test. We have developed<br />
peptide cocktails based on ESAT-6 and CFP-10 (1, 2, 3) and<br />
compared their performance to tuberculins in the IFN- assay for<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bTB in field studies in Ireland and France.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Lelystad tuberculin PPD antigens (avian and bovine) (Prionics,<br />
The Netherlands) or a synthetic peptide cocktail were used for<br />
stimulation <strong>of</strong> whole blood cultures. Following stimulation, plasma<br />
was harvested and IFN-γ was measured with the BOVIGAM ® 2G<br />
(Prionics, Switzerland) sandwich enzyme immunoassay. The<br />
peptide cocktail Prionics ® PC-HP (Prionics, Switzerland)<br />
contained overlapping peptides derived from ESAT-6 and CFP-<br />
10 and in addition peptides derived from Rv3615c and 3 other<br />
mycobacterial proteins. Diagnostic sensitivity was assessed in<br />
naturally bTB-exposed animals in Ireland. Diagnostic specificity<br />
was evaluated in France in animals from 12 herds free <strong>of</strong> bTB<br />
according to OIE criteria. Estimates for the test characteristics in<br />
the absence <strong>of</strong> a true gold standard were derived by a Bayesian<br />
model as described by Branscum et al. 2005 (4).<br />
Results<br />
Estimates <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and specificity (median and 95%<br />
confidence intervals) are shown in Table 1. In France 390<br />
animals have been included into the specificity trial. Specificity<br />
estimates for the BOVIGAM ®<br />
2G with tuberculin PPD from<br />
Lelystad was calculated with 84% (95%CI: 81% - 87%) whereas<br />
using the peptide cocktail PC-HP for whole blood stimulation a<br />
specificity estimate <strong>of</strong> 94% (95%CI: 92% - 96%) was computed.<br />
The difference in the specificity estimates <strong>of</strong> PPD and PC-HP<br />
was highly significant (p < 0.05; two-tailed exact Fisher test).<br />
Sensitivity was evaluated from the sample <strong>of</strong> 201 animals from<br />
Ireland, with an apparent prevalence (depending on test)<br />
between 16% and 31%. Sensitivity in this trial was calculated for<br />
Lelystad PPD with 89% (95%CI: 75% - 97%) whereas with PC-<br />
HP a comparable sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 85% (95%CI: 63% - 96%) was<br />
obtained.<br />
Table 1: Comparison <strong>of</strong> diagnostic performance estimates <strong>of</strong><br />
BOVIGAM ® 2G using PPD or antigen peptide cocktail PC-HP for<br />
stimulation <strong>of</strong> blood.<br />
Sensitivity<br />
Estimates<br />
95% CI<br />
Specificity<br />
Estimates<br />
95% CI<br />
PPD 89% 75 - 97% 84% 81 - 87%<br />
PC-HP 85% 64 - 96% 94% 92 - 96%<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Since 1991 when the BOVIGAM ® IFN- test was approved as an<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial test for bTB in Australia and later on in the European<br />
Union and the US, numerous field trials were undertaken to<br />
determine its diagnostic performance. In a review published by<br />
de la Rua-Domenech et al. (5) the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the IFN- test<br />
varied between 73.0% and 100%, with a median value <strong>of</strong> 87.6%<br />
while its median specificity was calculated with 96.6%, with a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> 85.0–99.6%. Using a Bayesian modelling approach, we<br />
have compared the diagnostic performance <strong>of</strong> the peptide<br />
cocktail Prionics ® PC-HP with tuberculin PPD for the stimulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> blood cultures in the BOVIGAM ® 2G IFN- assay. Our results<br />
suggest that the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the peptide cocktail PC-HP is not<br />
significantly different from the sensitivity with PPD whereas<br />
peptide cocktail PC-HP resulted in a specificity that was<br />
significantly higher than stimulation with PPD. Overall, we<br />
conclude from these studies that peptide cocktails provide<br />
superior performance compared to tuberculin PPD in the<br />
BOVIGAM ® 2G assay which opens up new possibilities for highly<br />
specific diagnostic tools in the eradication <strong>of</strong> bTB.<br />
References<br />
1. Buddle, BM, Ryan, TJ, Pollock, JM, Andersen, JM, and de Lisle, GW<br />
(2001). Use <strong>of</strong> ESAT-6 in the interferon- test for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bovine<br />
tuberculosis following skin testing. Vet Microbiol, 80, 37-46<br />
2. Sidders, B, Pirson, C, Hogarth, PJ, Hewinson, RG, Stoker, NG, and<br />
Vordermeier, HM (2008). Screening <strong>of</strong> highly expressed mycobacterial<br />
genes identifies Rv3615c as a useful differential diagnostic antigen for the<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infect Immun, 76, 3932-3939<br />
3. Schiller, I, Vordermeier, HM, Waters, WR, Palmer, M, Thacker, T,<br />
Whelan, A, Hardegger, R, Marg-Haufe, B, Raeber, A and Oesch, B (2009).<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium tuberculosis OmpATb as a novel antigen<br />
for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bovine tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 16,1314-21<br />
4. Branscum, AJ, Gardner, IA and Johnson WO (2005). Estimation <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. Prev<br />
Vet Med 68, 145-163<br />
5. De la Rua-Domenech, R, Goodchild, A.T., Vordermeier, H.M.,<br />
Hewinson, R.G., Christiansen, K.H., Clifton-Hadley, R.S. (2006) Ante<br />
mortem diagnosis <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis in cattle: a review <strong>of</strong> the tuberculin tests,<br />
gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques." Res<br />
Vet Sci 81: 190-210
S4 - O - 04<br />
MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION-TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY<br />
(MALDI-TOF MS) IN A VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY<br />
Annet E. Heuvelink, Refke Peerboom, Erik van Engelen, Abdul A. Hassan<br />
GD Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />
MALDI-TOF, bacterial identification, veterinary laboratory<br />
Introduction<br />
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time <strong>of</strong> Flight Mass<br />
Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has emerged as a new tool for<br />
fast and reliable identification <strong>of</strong> microorganisms (). We evaluated<br />
the performance <strong>of</strong> MALDI-TOF MS for the routine identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria in our veterinary diagnostic laboratory.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Mass spectra were acquired using a Micr<strong>of</strong>lex LT mass<br />
spectrometer and analysed by MALDI Biotyper 3.0 s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
(Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany).<br />
First, we determined the accuracy <strong>of</strong> MALDI-TOF MS<br />
identification by testing 66 bacterial strains <strong>of</strong> culture collections,<br />
in duplicate spots on the MALDI target plate. Second, we<br />
performed a prospective validation study, including 262 isolates<br />
collected in the routine laboratory: 156 isolates from post-mortem<br />
examinations <strong>of</strong> mammals and 106 mastitis pathogens from<br />
cow’s milk. The isolates were identified by conventional<br />
biochemical methods in parallel with MALDI-TOF MS, measured<br />
in duplicate spots. A selection <strong>of</strong> Gram-positive cocci, including<br />
coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and Streptococcus<br />
uberis isolates, were tested by both direct colony testing and the<br />
extended direct transfer method described by the manufacturer,<br />
comprising a rapid partial extraction with 70% aqueous formic<br />
acid. Finally, the repeatability and the robustness <strong>of</strong> identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS were evaluated. The repeatability<br />
was determined with five reference strains, by testing 10 cfu from<br />
one plate, in one run, by one technician. The robustness was<br />
evaluated by testing the effect <strong>of</strong> (a) refrigerated storage <strong>of</strong> fresh<br />
cultures grown on agar plates (for 24 or 48 h), (b) the use <strong>of</strong><br />
selective solid media, and (c) prolonged incubation (for 48 or 72<br />
h) either or not followed by a refrigeration step. For each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
species included in the robustness test, one reference strain and<br />
five field isolates were tested.<br />
some isolates, especially those <strong>of</strong> S. uberis, more not reliable<br />
identifications were obtained when performed with cultures stored<br />
for 48 h in the refrigerator or incubated for 48 h, and especially<br />
for 72 h prior to identification.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The present results show that MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable and<br />
rapid method for identification <strong>of</strong> most bacterial species<br />
encountered in our routine veterinary laboratory. No<br />
misidentifications occurred, only “no reliable identifications”. For<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> the isolates direct colony testing can be performed<br />
without extraction. For identification <strong>of</strong> presumptive CNS isolates,<br />
it is recommended to use the simple partial extraction procedure<br />
with 70% aqueous formic acid following the instructions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manufacturer.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the additional benefits <strong>of</strong> MALDI-TOF MS analysis is the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> CNS species. Species level identification <strong>of</strong> CNS<br />
will help to elucidate sources, transmission mechanisms and the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> different CNS species on cow health, productivity and<br />
milk quality, and this knowledge may lead to species-specific<br />
infection control measures.<br />
References<br />
1. Bizzini A, Greub G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization<br />
time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial<br />
identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16(11), 1614-1619.<br />
2. Wieser A, Schneider L, Jung J, Schubert S. MALDI-TOF MS<br />
in microbiological diagnostics-identification <strong>of</strong> microorganisms<br />
and beyond (mini review). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. <strong>2012</strong>,<br />
93(3), 965-974.<br />
Results<br />
Of the 66 reference strains tested, 79% were correctly identified<br />
to species level. The remaining strains were identified to genus<br />
level (14%) or could not be identified (7%). The latter strains<br />
belonged to species not included in the BioTyper 3.0 database.<br />
For 90% <strong>of</strong> the 156 isolates from post-mortem examinations <strong>of</strong><br />
mammals matching identifications at species level were obtained<br />
between MALDI-TOF MS and biochemical methods, 8% were<br />
correctly identified to genus level, and for 2% no reliable<br />
identifications were achieved. Eighty-nine% <strong>of</strong> the MALDI-TOF<br />
MS identifications <strong>of</strong> 106 mastitis pathogens were concordant<br />
with standard biochemical identifications. Ten% <strong>of</strong> the mastitis<br />
pathogens were identified to species level by MALDI-TOF MS<br />
(mainly CNS), while standard biochemical identifications <strong>of</strong> these<br />
isolates were at genus level only. For one isolate the MALDI-TOF<br />
MS result diverged from the biochemical identification; MALDI-<br />
TOF MS identified the isolate as Klebsiella pneumoniae, a<br />
qualitatively good result at species level, while the API 20E<br />
(bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) result was Klebsiella<br />
oxytoca, with a doubtful pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Most bacteria tested in this study<br />
could be successfully identified at species level using the direct<br />
colony testing method. However, for 70% <strong>of</strong> the CNS isolates the<br />
partial extraction procedure showed to be superior. For S. uberis<br />
the superiority <strong>of</strong> the extended direct transfer method appeared<br />
to be less pronounced, being observed for only 32% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
isolates.<br />
The repeatability <strong>of</strong> MALDI-TOF MS identification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reference strains <strong>of</strong> Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens,<br />
Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella Typhimurium was 100%.<br />
For the Streptococcus suis reference strain it was 90%, with 10%<br />
being not reliably identified.<br />
In general, MALDI-TOF MS identification results were not altered<br />
when performed with cultures stored for 24 or 48 h at<br />
refrigeration temperatures or with cultures tested after 48 or 72 h<br />
<strong>of</strong> incubation, nor when selective agars were used. However, for
S4 - O - 05<br />
RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF BOVINE MASTITIS PATHOGENS USING MALDI TOF<br />
Gudrun Overesch 1 , Andreas Thomann 1 , Vincent Perreten 1<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Bacteriology, University <strong>of</strong> Bern, Bern, Switzerland<br />
Maldi T<strong>of</strong>, mastitis, identification, veterinary pathogens<br />
Introduction<br />
Correct and rapid identification <strong>of</strong> pathogens is the main objective<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteriological diagnostic. Phenotypical identification<br />
procedures using biochemical parameters have been widely used<br />
in the last decades. Although automatic systems were developed,<br />
these methods are still time consuming. Therefore molecular<br />
identification methods, i. e. real time PCR, were established to<br />
replace biochemical approach when applicable. The exclusive<br />
use <strong>of</strong> molecular based diagnostic does not allow performing<br />
antibiotic susceptibility tests. The recently established matrixassisted<br />
laser desorption/ionization time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass<br />
spectroscopy (MALDI TOF MS) approach overcomes the<br />
disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the methods mentioned above. It is faster than<br />
PCR and, while working with cultured strains, it is possible to<br />
perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The databases <strong>of</strong><br />
MALDI TOF MS are usually based on spectra generated from<br />
human isolates [1]. Its use in veterinary bacteriology needs<br />
validation with livestock derived strains and update <strong>of</strong> the<br />
databases with spectra from relevant pathogens <strong>of</strong> veterinary<br />
interest. This study presents the establishment <strong>of</strong> MALDI TOF<br />
MS technology for the direct identification to the species level <strong>of</strong><br />
relevant bovine mastitis pathogens.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
156 bovine mastitis milk samples from individual cows were<br />
included. Ten microliter <strong>of</strong> whole milk was cultured on trypticase<br />
soy agar plates with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson) at 37 °C<br />
for 24 hours under aerobic conditions. Colonies were identified<br />
phenotypically by routine diagnostic procedures [2] [3]. In parallel,<br />
the same colonies were identified by MALDI TOF MS (Biotyper<br />
3.0, Bruker) using the direct transfer protocol recommended by<br />
the manufacturer. Brieflly, material from a single colony was<br />
taken with a toothpick, smeared on a steel plate in dublicates and<br />
overlaid with 1 μl <strong>of</strong> HCCA matrix solution. After air drying, the<br />
samples were measured using standard settings in the “Flex<br />
control” s<strong>of</strong>tware. For calibration and as an internal reference the<br />
“bacterial test standard” (BTS, Bruker) was applied in triplicate on<br />
every plate measured. Analysis <strong>of</strong> spectra with the Biotyper 3.0<br />
included a comparison against the internal commercial database<br />
in combination with the institute database. The latter was<br />
generated using veterinary field strains, which include coagulasenegative<br />
staphylococci (Table 1), S. pseudintermedius,<br />
Aerococcus viridans and Streptococcus uberis. All strains were<br />
identified with VITEK 2 (Biomérieux) and 16SrDNA sequence.<br />
New pr<strong>of</strong>iles were introduced into MALDI TOF MS database.<br />
Identification was accepted when a score value > 2.000 was<br />
achieved. All identified strains isolated from mastitis milk included<br />
in this study are listed in Table 1.<br />
Results<br />
After updating the commercial database with veterinary field<br />
strains (i. e. coagulase-negative staphylococci and. S. uberis)<br />
155 out <strong>of</strong> 156 biochemical defined strains were identified from a<br />
24 hour direct plating culture by MALDI TOF MS analyses (Table<br />
1). These strains include all highly relevant mastitis pathogens,<br />
i. e. staphylococci and streptococci species. MALDI TOF MS<br />
identified all alpha- double- and non-hemolytic Staphylococcus<br />
aureus. Trueperella (Arcanobacterium) pyogenes, Histophilus<br />
somni, E. coli and Klebsiella oxytoca were also clearly identified.<br />
Members <strong>of</strong> the Streptococcus-, Lactococcus-, Enterococcusgroup,<br />
which cannot be easily characterized using classical<br />
methods could also be identified to the species level using<br />
MALDI TOF MS. Only Corynebacterium bovis could not be<br />
directly identified by MALDI TOF MS, since this species has not<br />
yet been introduced in the new database.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
MALDI-TOF MS was shown to represent an excellent method for<br />
rapid species identification <strong>of</strong> relevant bovine mastitis pathogens<br />
by direct analysis <strong>of</strong> overnight cultures. However, the commercial<br />
database needed to be expanded with pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> important<br />
bovine mastitis pathogens. Further improvement such has<br />
extraction prior identification should also be engaged to increase<br />
the identification spectrum. A more detailed identification <strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria present in mastitis milk will also allow to increase the<br />
knowledge regarding species diversity involved in mastitis.<br />
Table 1: Biochemical identification and Maldi T<strong>of</strong> identification <strong>of</strong><br />
bacterial strains isolated from mastitis milk<br />
Isolates<br />
(N)<br />
Biochemical<br />
identification<br />
Maldi T<strong>of</strong> identification<br />
(number)<br />
39 Streptococcus uberis Streptococcus uberis<br />
39<br />
16<br />
15<br />
14<br />
9<br />
Non haemolytic<br />
staphylococci<br />
Double haemolytic<br />
S. aureus<br />
Streptococcus-,<br />
Lactococcus-,<br />
Enterococcus-group<br />
Alpha haemolytic<br />
staphylococci<br />
Streptococcus<br />
dysgalactiae subsp.<br />
dysgalactiae<br />
8 Enterococcus spp.<br />
5<br />
Trueperella<br />
(Arcanobacterium)<br />
pyogenes<br />
S*. xylosus (19)<br />
S. chromogenes (7)<br />
S. sciuri (4)<br />
S. epidermidis (2)<br />
S. vitulinus (2)<br />
S. equorum (2)<br />
S. warneri (1)<br />
S. devriesei (1)<br />
S. aureus (1)<br />
S. aureus (16)<br />
Lactococcus garvieae (9)<br />
Aerococcus viridans (3)<br />
Lactococcus lactis (1)<br />
Enterococcus devriesei (1)<br />
Streptococcus uberis (1)<br />
S. aureus (6)<br />
S. hemolyticus (5)<br />
S. xylosus (3)<br />
Streptococcus dysgalactiae<br />
subsp. dysgalactiae<br />
Enterococcus faecalis (4)<br />
Aerococcus viridans (2)<br />
Streptococcus equinus (1)<br />
Enterococcus faecium (1)<br />
Trueperella<br />
(Arcanobacterium) pyogenes<br />
4 Escherichia coli Escherichia coli<br />
2<br />
Streptococcus<br />
agalactiae<br />
Streptococcus agalactiae<br />
1 Histophilus somni Histophilus somni<br />
1 Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella oxytoca<br />
*S. = Staphylococcus<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
This study was partially financed by grant 1.11.21 <strong>of</strong> the Federal<br />
Veterinary Office (FVO), Switzerland.<br />
References<br />
1. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, et<br />
al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification <strong>of</strong> bacteria by<br />
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass<br />
spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(4):543-551.<br />
2. Guélat-Brechbuehl M, Thomann A, Albini S, Moret-Stalder S, Reist M,<br />
Bodmer M, et al. Cross-sectional study <strong>of</strong> Streptococcus species in<br />
quarter milk samples <strong>of</strong> dairy cows in the canton <strong>of</strong> Bern, Switzerland. Vet<br />
Rec 2010;167(6):211-215.<br />
3. Moret-Stalder S, Fournier C, Miserez R, Albini S, Doherr MG, Reist M,<br />
et al. Prevalence study <strong>of</strong> Staphylococcus aureus in quarter milk samples<br />
<strong>of</strong> dairy cows in the Canton <strong>of</strong> Bern, Switzerland. Prev Vet Med<br />
2009;88(1):72-76.
S4 - O - 06<br />
15 MINUTE ELISA USING A LOW COST COMMERCIAL BIOSENSOR<br />
Jason Sawyer 1 , Jennifer Cork 1 , Rebecca Jones 1<br />
1<br />
AHVLA (Weybridge), Technology Transfer Unit, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK<br />
ELISA, IBR, Biosensor, Penside testing, Serology, Vantix<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> biosensors for diagnostic testing <strong>of</strong>fers several<br />
potential advantages, but to date their use for routine diagnostic<br />
testing has been limited to specific markets (e.g. glucose testing).<br />
We evaluated the use <strong>of</strong> a commercially available potentiometric<br />
biosensor platform - Vantix - to carry out a serological assay<br />
for antibodies to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), caused<br />
by Bovine Herpes Virus 1 (BoHV-1).<br />
The Vantix system 1<br />
comprises a low cost reader unit and<br />
disposable potentiometric biosensors. The biosensors consist <strong>of</strong><br />
a working and reference electrode coated in a conductive<br />
polymer (polypyrrole) and covered in a protective plastic film.<br />
Biochemical or enzymatic activity taking place on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />
the working electrode as a result <strong>of</strong> immunocomplexes built up on<br />
the electrode, cause electrochemical changes in the conductive<br />
polymer layer on and around the working electrode thus<br />
generating a measurable change in electrical potential (measured<br />
in millivolts) relative to the reference electrode. The signal<br />
produced is proportional to the level <strong>of</strong> analyte under<br />
investigation.<br />
IBR is a highly contagious disease <strong>of</strong> cattle that is endemic in the<br />
UK and many other parts <strong>of</strong> the world 2 . ELISA is commonly used<br />
in the detection and control <strong>of</strong> this disease and AHVLA uses an<br />
in-house indirect ELISA. In this assay, BoHV-1 antigens, bound<br />
to the surface <strong>of</strong> a microtitre plate, capture BoHV-1 specific<br />
antibodies present in test samples. Bound antibodies are then<br />
detected using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labelled antibovine<br />
immunoglobulin and subsequent HRP catalysed oxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the chromogen substrate 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)<br />
produces a colour change. The in-house ELISA for BoHV-1 used<br />
at AHVLA has a total assay time <strong>of</strong> over 3 hours which is typical<br />
<strong>of</strong> commercial ELISA tests.<br />
In this work, the well-characterised and established reagents<br />
used in the parent ELISA were used to construct an assay on the<br />
Vantix platform. A panel <strong>of</strong> serum samples, submitted for<br />
routine ELISA testing, were then tested with the Vantix assay and<br />
the results compared to the parent ELISA.<br />
Table 1: Comparison <strong>of</strong> methodology <strong>of</strong> the IBR antibody biosensor<br />
assay and parent ELISA.<br />
Biosensor assay<br />
Indirect ELISA<br />
Step<br />
Incubation<br />
Incubation<br />
Step<br />
Time<br />
Time<br />
Biosensors and ELISA plates pre coated with BoHV1 antigen<br />
and stored ready for use<br />
Incubation with diluted<br />
Incubation with diluted<br />
5 min<br />
sample<br />
sample<br />
2 h<br />
8 Washes no soak 0.5 min<br />
5 x washes 10 second<br />
soak<br />
5 min<br />
Incubation with diluted<br />
Rabbit anti bovine HRP 5 min<br />
Incubation with diluted<br />
Rabbit anti bovine HRP 1 h<br />
Conjugate<br />
Conjugate<br />
8 Washes no soak 0.5 min<br />
5 x washes 10 second<br />
soak<br />
5 min<br />
Probes added to TMB<br />
Plate incubated with<br />
5 – 20 min<br />
substrate and read<br />
TMB substrate.<br />
4 min<br />
immediately. Potential<br />
Addition <strong>of</strong> Stop 1 min<br />
difference reading.<br />
Colorimetric read 1 min<br />
Total assay time 15 min Total assay time >3.25 h<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Table 1 summarises the steps and timings involved in the<br />
performing the Biosensor assay compared to the ELISA.<br />
Biosensor probes were prepared by coating with BoHV-1 antigen,<br />
and were then stored at +4 o C for up to 12 weeks. To perform the<br />
assay, the electrodes <strong>of</strong> the antigen coated biosensors were<br />
briefly placed in diluted serum, washed, and briefly incubated<br />
with conjugate. After a final wash step, the sensors were<br />
inserted into the Vantix reader unit and the working and<br />
reference electrode placed into TMB substrate. Changes in<br />
electrochemical potential difference were observed over a period<br />
<strong>of</strong> four minutes and recorded using Vantix s<strong>of</strong>tware. The<br />
biosensor assay was used to test 194 serum samples,<br />
comprising 90 positive and 104 negative as designated by the in<br />
house ELISA.<br />
% signal relative to weak<br />
positive control<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
IBR Biosensor<br />
2 x 2 box analysis assay<br />
Serum Samples Positive Negative Totals<br />
IBR<br />
ELISA<br />
Negative<br />
Positive 86 4 90<br />
Negative 2 102 104<br />
Totals 88 104 194<br />
Positive<br />
True positive rate<br />
(Sensitivity)<br />
0<br />
0 25 50 75 100<br />
False positive rate<br />
(100 - Specificity)<br />
Fig.1 Comparison <strong>of</strong> results obtained when testing serum<br />
samples using the parent IBR antibody ELISA and the biosensor<br />
assay. 2x2 table (Top); Box and whisker plot showing biosensor<br />
results for ELISA negative and positive samples (bottom left) and<br />
ROC analysis (bottom right).<br />
Results<br />
Fig 1 shows the resulting 2X2 Table, Box and Whisker plot and<br />
ROC curve when the biosensor assay was compared to the<br />
ELISA. Using the optimal cut-<strong>of</strong>f value (determined by ROC<br />
analysis and based on a percentage signal relative to the weak<br />
positive control serum run alongside the test samples) the<br />
biosensor assay had a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 98% and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 96%<br />
when compared to the indirect ELISA. Only 6 <strong>of</strong> 194 samples<br />
resulting in a different categorisation (positive or negative)<br />
compared to the ELISA results. Overall, the results demonstrate<br />
that the biosensor assay produces test results that closely match<br />
those obtained with the parent ELISA.<br />
Discussion & conclusion<br />
This work has shown that results equivalent to the ELISA can be<br />
obtained using the Vantix biosensor platform in 15 min. The<br />
relatively low cost <strong>of</strong> the biosensors (~ few Euro each) and reader<br />
(~ few thousand euro) make this an interesting and promising<br />
technology. The rapid and simple nature <strong>of</strong> the assays, and the<br />
fact that established ELISA reagents can readily be converted to<br />
the platform, suggest Vantix could be useful in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnostic testing scenarios. These may include rapid testing <strong>of</strong><br />
samples which require fast turnaround or testing in low tech<br />
laboratories. The generation <strong>of</strong> an electronic signal <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />
potential for transmission across mobile networks. Vantix are<br />
currently developing a hand held device which uses the same<br />
biosensors but <strong>of</strong>fers the potential for more rapid (
Poster presentations<br />
“General Session”<br />
(1 st session)
S1 - P - 01<br />
LAWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS IN BLUE FOXES IN FINLAND. A CASE REPORT<br />
Heli Kallio, Heikki Ahola<br />
Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Production Animal and Wildlife Health Research Unit, Seinäjoki, Finland<br />
Lawsonia intracellularis, blue fox, enteritis, diarrhoea, rectum prolapse<br />
Introduction<br />
Lawsonia intracellularis-bacteria is commonly detected in the<br />
enteritis in domestic pigs with proliferative enteropathy, intestinal<br />
adenomatosis and ileitis. In addition to pigs, Lawsonia<br />
intracellularis has been detected in wide variety <strong>of</strong> domestic and<br />
wild animals, including wild red foxes, and it is also suggested to<br />
be found in blue foxes reared in a fur farm. However,<br />
pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> Lawsonia intracellularis enteritis in fur farm<br />
animals is poorly studied. In this study we detected Lawsonia<br />
intracellularis for the first time in enteritis from blue fox in a<br />
Finnish fur farm.<br />
A 1 2 3 4<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A blue fox was submitted to laboratory for diagnostic because <strong>of</strong><br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea in a single farm. Symptoms <strong>of</strong> the foxes<br />
were, in addition to diarrhoea with loose faeces, decreased<br />
weight gain, and rectal prolapses.<br />
Necropsy was performed for the fox. Then intestinal samples<br />
were prepared for HE- and WS staining. Nested-PCR for the<br />
epithelium <strong>of</strong> the intestine was performed as earlier described by<br />
Jones et al. to detect Lawsonia intracellularis -bacteria. Prior to<br />
PCR DNA was extracted by boiling procedure according to<br />
Moeller et al. Intestinal samples were cultured on sheep blood<br />
agar in aerobic and anaerobic atmosphere, as well as plated onto<br />
a Campylobacter blood-free selective medium. The Sheather's<br />
sugar flotation technique was used to detect parasites.<br />
Results<br />
In necropsy rectal prolapse, severe hyperemia, oedema and<br />
thickening <strong>of</strong> mucosa in the distal ileum, colon and rectum were<br />
detected. Signs <strong>of</strong> poor growth and loss <strong>of</strong> fluid were also seen.<br />
In histology the fox had proliferative enteritis, colitis and proctitis<br />
with severe villushyperemia and –necrosis, and hypertrophic<br />
dilated crypts with vigorously branching structure. By WS-staining<br />
curved organisms, in the apical cytoplasm <strong>of</strong> hyperplastic<br />
epithelium lining intestinal glands, were detected. Using nested-<br />
PCR, Lawsonia intracellularis was discovered from the intestinal<br />
samples. No other putative pathogens were identified in<br />
bacteriological and parasitological studies.<br />
Figure 2. Amplification <strong>of</strong> Lawsonia intracellularis after nested-<br />
PCR analysis from intestine. Negative amplification control (1),<br />
positive amplification control (2), two separate samples from the<br />
epithelium <strong>of</strong> the intestine (3, 4). DNA ladder, 100-1000 bp (A)<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results obtained by this study show the Lawsonia<br />
intracellularis caused diarrhoea for the first time in Finnish blue<br />
fox farm. The fox examined showed typical changes in necropsy<br />
and histology. Lawsonia intracellularis was detected by PCR and<br />
WS-staining. Eriksen et al. reported earlier adenomatosis in blue<br />
foxes reared in a fur farm, most likely caused by Lawsonia<br />
intracellularis. Lawsonia intracellularis has been detected also<br />
from faeces <strong>of</strong> wild red foxes. However, according to our<br />
knowledge, other reports about Lawsonia intracellularis in foxes<br />
have not been published. Significance <strong>of</strong> Lawsonia intracellularis<br />
for fox farming is still poorly understood and further studies are<br />
required.<br />
References<br />
1. Tomanova,K Literak,I, Klimes,J Pavlacik,L, Mrlik,V and Smola,J (<br />
2003). Lawsonia intracellularis in Wild Mammals in the Slovak<br />
Carpathians. Journal <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Diseases, 39(2), 407-411<br />
2. Eriksen,K, Landsverk,K.T and Bratberg,B. (1990). Morphology and<br />
immunoperoxidase studies <strong>of</strong> intestinal adenomatosis in the blue fox,<br />
Alopex lagopus. Journal <strong>of</strong> Comparative Pathology, 102, 265-278<br />
3. Jones,GF, Ward,GE, Murtaugh,MP, Lin G, Gebhart,CJ (1993)<br />
Enhanced detection <strong>of</strong> intracellular organism <strong>of</strong> swine proliferative enteritis,<br />
ileal symbiont intracellularis, in feces by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin<br />
Microbiol, 31(10), 2611-5<br />
4. Møller,K, Jensen,TK, Jorsal,SE, Leser,TD, Carstensen,B (1998)<br />
Detection <strong>of</strong> Lawsonia intracellularis, Serpulina hyodysenteriae, weakly<br />
beta-haemolytic intestinal spirochaetes, Salmonella enterica, and<br />
haemolytic Escherichia coli from swine herds with and without diarrhoea<br />
among growing pigs. Vet Microbiol, 30;62(1), 59-72<br />
Figure 1. Curved organisms in the apical cytoplasm <strong>of</strong><br />
hyperplastic epithelium lining intestinal glands stain positively in<br />
WS-staining.
S1 - P - 02<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF A COMMERCIAL PRRS SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA ADAPTED TO<br />
ORAL FLUID: LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE IN EXPERIMENTALLY-INOCULATED POPULATIONS<br />
Apisit Kittawornrat 1 , John Prickett 1 , Chong Wang 1, 2 , Chris Olsen 1 , Yaowalak Panyasing 1 , Andrea Ballagi 3 ,<br />
Anna Rice 3 , Sergio Lizano 3 , Raymond Rowland 4 , Jeffrey Zimmerman 1<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States, 3 IDEXX<br />
Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine, United States, 4 Department <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas<br />
Introduction<br />
Previous work showed that a commercial PRRS ELISA<br />
(HerdChek® PRRS X3 ELISA) could be adapted to detect anti-<br />
PRRSV IgM, IgA, and IgG in oral fluid specimens. Further, the<br />
protocol for the IgG ELISA for oral fluid samples was readily<br />
amenable to the routine performance <strong>of</strong> the assay in highthroughput<br />
diagnostic laboratories. This suggested the possibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cost-effective method to routinely monitor commercial swine<br />
populations for maternal antibody, vaccination compliance, and<br />
herd immune parameters using oral fluid sampling. The purpose<br />
<strong>of</strong> the present study was to evaluate the ability <strong>of</strong> the PRRS oral<br />
fluid IgG ELISA to detect anti-PRRSV IgG antibody in pen-based<br />
oral fluid samples from experimentally inoculated pigs over time.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
In nine trials, ~200 pigs per trials were intramuscularly (IM)<br />
inoculated with PRRSV isolate NVSL 97-7895. Oral fluid<br />
samples were collected on 0, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 17, and 21 days<br />
post inoculation (DPI). All oral fluid samples were randomized<br />
and tested for anti-PRRSV antibodies using the PRRS ELISA<br />
protocol for oral fluids: 1:2 oral fluid sample dilution, 250µl sample<br />
volume, 16 hour incubation at 4°C, and detection <strong>of</strong> reaction<br />
using anti-pig IgM, IgA, and IgG FC (1).<br />
Results<br />
Anti-PRRSV antibody isotype (IgM, IgA, IgG FC ) kinetics in<br />
experimental samples are shown in Figure 1 for oral fluid<br />
samples collected on DPI 0, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 17, and 21. Mean<br />
IgM, IgA, and IgG S/P ratios on DPI 7 were 1.14 (95% confidence<br />
interval (CI) 1.04, 1.24), 0.09 (95% CI 0.06, 0.12), and 0.59 (95%<br />
CI 0.50, 0.68), respectively. The mean IgM S/P ratio peaked at<br />
DPI 9 (1.88, 95% CI 1.78, 1.97) and declined rapidly to a mean<br />
S/P <strong>of</strong> 0.10 (95% CI 0.09, 0.13) on DPI 21. Mean IgA and IgG<br />
S/P ratios peaked at DPI 11 (1.41, 95% CI 1.29, 1.53) and DPI<br />
14 (3.69, 95% CI 3.52, 3.85), respectively. Mean IgA and IgG<br />
S/P ratios remained relatively constant until the end <strong>of</strong> study at<br />
DPI 21.<br />
Oral fluid, ELISA, Experimental samples, PRRSV, Antibody<br />
Figure 1: Kinetics <strong>of</strong> anti-PRRSV antibody isotypes (IgM, IgA,<br />
IgG FC ) in experimental samples<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
These results indicated that anti-PRRSV antibodies in oral fluid<br />
are amenable to rapid detection post-infection. Testing based on<br />
oral fluids could provide an efficient, cost-effective approach to<br />
PRRSV monitoring in commercial herds and surveillance in<br />
elimination programs.<br />
References<br />
1. Kittawomrat, A et al.: <strong>2012</strong>. Detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV antibodies in oral fluid<br />
specimens using a commercial PRRSV serum antibody ELISA. J Vet<br />
Diagn Invest 24 (2):262-269
S1 - P - 03<br />
DETECTION OF PRRSV ANTIBODY IN ORAL FLUID SPECIMENS FROM INDIVIDUAL BOARS USING A<br />
COMMERCIAL PRRSV SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA<br />
Apisit Kittawornrat 1 , Mark Engle 3 , John Johnson 1 , John Prickett 1 , Chris Olsen 1 , Trevor Schwartz 1 , Daniel<br />
Whitney 1 , Kent Schwartz 1 , Anna Rice 4 , Andrea Ballagi 4 , Sergio Lizano 4 , Chong Wang 1,2 , Jeffrey Zimmerman 1<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Iowa State University, 3 PIC North America,<br />
Hendersonville, Tennessee, USA, 4 IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine, USA<br />
Oral fluid, Individual boar, ELISA, PRRSV<br />
Introduction<br />
Oral fluid specimens are used in human medicine for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> infectious agents, hormones, and drugs.<br />
Oral fluid samples are <strong>of</strong> interest in swine medicine because they<br />
are easily collected, yet highly efficacious for the surveillance <strong>of</strong><br />
PRRSV and other pathogens using PCR-based assays (1,3).<br />
Recent work showed that a commercial PRRS serum antibody<br />
ELISA (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, ME USA) could be<br />
adapted to detect PRRSV antibody in oral fluid specimens (2). In<br />
the current study we describe the kinetics <strong>of</strong> the ELISAdetectable<br />
anti-PRRSV IgG response in oral fluids collected from<br />
individually-housed boars.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study was conducted in 72 boars ranging from 6 months to<br />
3.6 years in age. Boars were under the ownership <strong>of</strong> PIC North<br />
America (Hendersonville, TN USA) and housing, study<br />
procedures, and protocols were approved and supervised by the<br />
PIC USA Health Assurance and Welfare department.<br />
Boars were assigned to three trials (I, II, III). Boars (n = 24) in<br />
Trial I were intramuscularly (IM) inoculated with 2 ml <strong>of</strong> a<br />
modified live virus (MLV) vaccine (RespPRRS®, Boehringer<br />
Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., St. Joseph, MO USA). Boars (n = 22)<br />
in Trial II were IM inoculated with 2 ml <strong>of</strong> a Type 1 PRRSV field<br />
isolate. Boars (n = 24) in Trial III were IM inoculated with 2 ml <strong>of</strong> a<br />
PRRSV Type 2 isolate (MN-184).<br />
Boars were monitored for 21 days post inoculation (DPI). Oral<br />
fluid samples were collected daily using 5/8" 3-strand 100%<br />
cotton rope. Serum samples were collected from all boars on DPI<br />
-7, 0, 7, 14, 21 and from 4 randomly selected boars on DPIs 3, 5,<br />
10, and 17. Thereafter, serum and oral fluid were assayed for<br />
PRRSV antibody using the ELISA protocol appropriate for each<br />
sample type (serum or oral fluid).<br />
Results<br />
The ELISA S/P response in oral fluid and serum samples<br />
followed similar patterns over time (Figure 1). Individual boar oral<br />
fluid samples were ELISA positive from DPI 8 to DPI 21 (Table<br />
1). Overall, 96% <strong>of</strong> the results were in agreement, i.e., 145 oral<br />
fluid samples and 150 serum samples were ELISA positive.<br />
Table 1: Detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV antibody in oral fluid samples from<br />
individually housed boars<br />
PRRSV<br />
ELISA-positive boars (%) by day post inoculation<br />
0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 & 21<br />
MLV 0 0 38 71 88 96 100 100 100<br />
Type 1 0 17 42 59 82 82 81 85 100<br />
Type 2 0 17 65 83 96 96 100 100 100<br />
Total 0 11 48 71 89 91 91 93 100<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The ring test results showed that the PRRS oral fluid IgG ELISA<br />
was highly reproducible across laboratories. These results<br />
support the routine use <strong>of</strong> this test in laboratories providing<br />
diagnostic service to pig producers. Thus, herd monitoring based<br />
on oral fluid sampling could be one part <strong>of</strong> a PRRSV control<br />
and/or elimination program. Further, the successful adaptation <strong>of</strong><br />
one assay to the oral fluid matrix suggests that this approach<br />
could provide the basis for monitoring specific health and welfare<br />
indicators in commercial swine herds using a "pig friendly"<br />
approach.<br />
References<br />
1. Kittawornrat A, et al. 2010. PRRSV in serum and oral fluid samples from<br />
individual boars. Virus Res 154:170-176.<br />
2. Kittawornrat A, et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV antibodies in oral fluid<br />
specimens using a commercial PRRSV serum antibody ELISA. J Vet<br />
Diagn Invest 24(2):262-269.<br />
3. Ramirez et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Efficient surveillance <strong>of</strong> pig populations using oral<br />
fluids. Prev Vet Med (Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print).<br />
Figure 1: Mean PRRS antibody ELISA kinetics over time: ora<br />
fluid vs. serum samples
S1 - P - 04<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF MAIN HAEMOPARASITIC DISEASES OF CATTLE BY REAL-TIME PCR.<br />
Villa Aleida 1 ; Benito AA 1 ; Arnal JL 1 ; Serrano JD 1 and Baselga R 1 .<br />
1 EXOPOL Autovacunas y Diagnóstico. Pol. Río Gállego, 50840 San Mateo de Gállego Zaragoza, España. Tel 976 69 45 25, exopol@exopol.com<br />
Piroplasmosis, Anaplasmosis, Diagnostic, qPCR, cattle<br />
Introduction<br />
Piroplasmosis and Anaplasmosis are the most important blood<br />
parasitic diseases in cattle and responsible for significant<br />
economical losses and mortality in livestock from many countries.<br />
Although these diseases occur mainly in tropical and subtropical<br />
areas, they are also becoming an increasing and serious problem<br />
in Europe ( 1 ). Clinical signs in haemoparasitic diseases are quite<br />
similar and include anemia, pyrexia, weakness, weight loss and<br />
drop in production levels. Bovine Piroplasmosis is caused by<br />
pathogenic Babesia and Theileria species. Th. parva and Th.<br />
annulata are the most important pathogens in this genus,<br />
although only Th. Annulata has been described in Europe ( 2 ).<br />
There are several pathogenic Babesia species affecting cattle (B.<br />
major, B. bovis, B. divergens and B.bigemina), but B. bigemina<br />
and B. bovis are the most frequently described ( 3 ). Bovine<br />
Anaplasmosis is caused by rickettsia <strong>of</strong> genus Anaplasma. A.<br />
marginale is considered the most pathogenic specie while A.<br />
centrale has been implicated in mild or less severe cases <strong>of</strong> this<br />
disease ( 4 ) .<br />
Laboratory diagnosis <strong>of</strong> these pathogens included<br />
their microscopical identification in blood smears; however, this<br />
method requires highly qualified personnel and is not reliable for<br />
detecting pre-symptomatic or carrier animals. Serological tests<br />
can also be used; although problems <strong>of</strong> cross-reactivity between<br />
pathogens <strong>of</strong> same genus have been reported. Recently, some<br />
techniques <strong>of</strong> polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been<br />
developed and allowed a specific and sensitive detection <strong>of</strong> these<br />
agents ( 5 ) .<br />
The main objective <strong>of</strong> this study was evaluate the<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> a Real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
Th. annulata, Th. parva, B. bigemina, B. bovis, A. marginale, A.<br />
centrale and A. phagocitophylum, in a multiparametric test for a<br />
specific identification and also quantification <strong>of</strong> these main tickborne<br />
pathogens <strong>of</strong> cattle.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Samples: A total <strong>of</strong> 122 cases (330 blood, 58 serum and 9 tissue<br />
samples) submitted to our laboratory with suspect <strong>of</strong><br />
haemoparasitic disease were evaluated. Some <strong>of</strong> these cases<br />
(10% aprox) had macroscopical findings and histopathological<br />
lesions <strong>of</strong> haemolytic syndrome. Most <strong>of</strong> cases 93% (113/122)<br />
came from 21 provinces in Spain and the rest from Portugal.<br />
Whole blood, serum and tissue samples were subjected to DNA<br />
extraction individually or pooled up to five per case.<br />
DNA extraction: A commercial kit “Genomic mini Kit LGD 500<br />
LabTurbo” and an automated DNA/RNA extraction System<br />
“LabTurbo 36 compact system C3620” (Taigen Bioscience<br />
Corporation, Taiwan) were used for DNA extraction following the<br />
manufacturer's instructions. DNA purity (260/280) and DNA yields<br />
were determined using a micro-volume spectrophotometer<br />
(Quawell UV Q5000, s<strong>of</strong>tware 4.0).<br />
Quantitative Real-Time PCR (Genesig Ltd): The qPCR assays<br />
used in this study identified the following pathogen-specific<br />
targets: Tams1 gene (Merozoite-piroplasm surface antigen) for<br />
Th. annulata; p104 gene (Microneme-rhoptry antigen) for Th.<br />
Parva; 18S gene (18S ribosomal RNA) for B. bigemina; 18S<br />
gene (18S ribosomal RNA) for B. bovis; msp4 gene (Major<br />
surface protein 4) for A. marginale; gen; msp2 gene (Major<br />
surface protein 2) for A. centrale and msp4 gene (Major surface<br />
protein 4) for A. phagocytophylum. A unique qPCR protocol were<br />
performed for all these pathogens according manufacturer's<br />
instructions, briefly: 10µl <strong>of</strong> MasterMix, 1µl <strong>of</strong> pathogen-specific<br />
primer/probe (FAM labeled, BHQ quenched), 5µl <strong>of</strong> RNAse/<br />
DNAse free water and 5µl <strong>of</strong> DNA sample (> 5ng) or control<br />
template conformed the PCR reaction in a final volume <strong>of</strong> 20 µl.<br />
Amplification reactions were carried out on a MiniOpticon RT<br />
System CFB3120 thermal cycler (Bio Rad, s<strong>of</strong>tware CFX<br />
manager 2.0) using a unique thermal pr<strong>of</strong>ile for all qPCRs<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> an initial enzyme activation step <strong>of</strong> 10 min a 95º C,<br />
followed by 50 cycles <strong>of</strong>: a denaturing step <strong>of</strong> 10 sec at 95º C,<br />
and an annealing/data collection step <strong>of</strong> 60 second at 60º C.<br />
Positive cut-<strong>of</strong>f value was established in ≤ 45 cycles. Detection<br />
limits and quantification were performed by 10 fold dilutions (10 6<br />
a 10 0 ) <strong>of</strong> specific DNA plasmids for each pathogen. Negative<br />
samples were evaluated for DNA integrity by amplification <strong>of</strong><br />
Beta-actina house-keeping gene.<br />
Results<br />
This multi-parametric qPCR assay was robust, specific and<br />
showed an analytical sensitivity for at less 10 2 copies <strong>of</strong> the target<br />
DNA. The Cq values for positive controls ranged from 25 to 35<br />
and the qPCR efficiencies were around 95% with R 2<br />
values<br />
above 0.990. A total <strong>of</strong> 122 cases were evaluated in this study<br />
and 49% (59/122) <strong>of</strong> them were positive by qPCR for at less one<br />
<strong>of</strong> these pathogens. Haemoparasites were detected in blood<br />
samples 52% (171/330), but also in tissue 22% (2/9) and serum<br />
38% (22/58) samples. Nearly 10% <strong>of</strong> cases had macroscopical<br />
and/or histopathological lesions compatible with haemolytic<br />
syndrome. Microscopical identification <strong>of</strong> Piroplasmids and<br />
Anaplasma were found in blood and/or tissue samples from 8 <strong>of</strong><br />
these cases and all <strong>of</strong> them had one or more positive result for<br />
haemoparasites by qPCR. From the overall cases Th. annulata<br />
27% (33/122) and A. marginale 27% (33/122) were the more<br />
frequent detected pathogens, followed by B. bigemina 16%<br />
(20/122), B. bovis 2% (3/122) and A. phaghocytophylum 2%<br />
(2/122). No positive cases were recorded for Th. Parva (0/122)<br />
and A. centrale (0/122). Concurrent infections with Th. annulata,<br />
A. marginale and B. bigemina were detected in 15% (9/57) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
positive cases.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Specific identification <strong>of</strong> haemoparasites infecting cattle is a<br />
crucial step for control <strong>of</strong> these diseases; because measures and<br />
treatment depend <strong>of</strong> the implicated agent. Although microscopical<br />
identification is possible it is not always reliable even for most<br />
expertice technicians. Clinical diagnosis is also difficult, by the<br />
similar symptomatology in these diseases. Our results clearly<br />
demonstrate the value <strong>of</strong> these qPCRs as a specifics and<br />
sensitive diagnostic tools for the rapid detection <strong>of</strong> main tickborne<br />
disease <strong>of</strong> cattle in blood and tissue sample from infected<br />
animals. The use <strong>of</strong> this qPCR multi-parametric assay allow a<br />
complete diagnosis <strong>of</strong> the main haemoparasitic diseases in a<br />
rapid way and reducing cost by pooling samples, up to five, per<br />
case. It also has the advantge for no competition <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />
primers by the target DNA, such ocurrs in a qPCR multiplex<br />
where a DNA depletion could happen mainly in animals with<br />
mixed infections. Our results showed a high percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
haemoparasitic infections, mainly Th annulata, A. marginale and<br />
B. bigemina, in the evaluated cases from the Iberian peninsula<br />
and justified the use <strong>of</strong> specific and sensitive diagnostic test, as<br />
this qPCR, to study the real epidemiological situation <strong>of</strong> these<br />
disease in the cattle population from these countries.<br />
References<br />
1. Paul Heyman, Christel Cochez, Agnetha H<strong>of</strong>huis, Joke van der Giessen,<br />
Hein Sprong, Sarah Rebecca Porter, et al. A clear and present danger:<br />
Tick-borne diseases in Europe. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010; 8(1):33-<br />
50.<br />
2. R. Cassini, F. Marcer, F. di Regalbono, G. Cancrini, S. Gabrielli, A.<br />
Moretti, et al. New insights into the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> bovine piroplasmoses<br />
in Italy. Vet Parasit <strong>2012</strong>(184):77-82.2. R. Cassini, F. Marcer, F. di<br />
Regalbono, G. Cancrini, S. Gabrielli, A. Moretti, et al. New insights into the<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> bovine piroplasmoses in Italy. Vet Parasit <strong>2012</strong>(184):77-<br />
82.<br />
3. S. Almeria, J. Castellà, D. Ferrer, A. Ortuño, A. Estrada-Peña, J.F.<br />
Gutiérrez. Bovine piroplasms in Minorca (Balearic Islands, Spain): a<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> PCR-based and light microscopy detection. Vet Parasitol<br />
2001(99):249–259.<br />
4. L. Ceci, N. Decaro, E. Lorusso, P. Paradies, G. Elia, V. Martella, et al.<br />
First report <strong>of</strong> bovine anaplasmosis by Anaplasma centrale in Europe,<br />
molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis. Vet Res commun<br />
2008(32):S236-S266.<br />
5. Oficina Internacional de Epizootias (OIE). Manual de las Pruebas de<br />
Diagnóstico y de las Vacunas para los Animales Terrestres. 2008.
S1 - P - 05<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A NEW AND ORIGINAL EXTRACTION PROTOCOL TO<br />
DETECT MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS IN BOVINE FECES BY REAL TIME<br />
PCR<br />
Blanchard Béatrice. 1 , Versmisse Yann. 1 , Rouillard Tony. 2<br />
1 ADIAGENE, 38 rue de Paris 22000 Saint Brieuc, FRANCE<br />
2<br />
AES CHEMUNEX, Rue Maryse Bastié, 35172 Bruz, FRANCE<br />
Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (Map), real-time PCR, diagnosis, low shedder.<br />
Introduction<br />
Mycobacterium avium ssp paratuberculosis (MAP) is the<br />
etiological agent <strong>of</strong> Johne’s disease, a granulomatous enteritis<br />
that can affect cattle, sheep and goats and other non ruminant<br />
wildlife species. Numerous countries have set up programmes to<br />
control the disease. It requires the development <strong>of</strong> highthroughput<br />
sensitive diagnostic methods for the direct detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> infected animals. The performance <strong>of</strong> the PCR methods was<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten hampered by low sample input and inhibition. To increase<br />
the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> diagnostic test, we developed an original<br />
protocol to concentrate Map from 6g <strong>of</strong> faecal samples and<br />
compared the real time PCR results obtained with classical DNA<br />
extraction from 1g.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A negative faeces collected from a paratuberculosis-free herd<br />
was spiked with serial dilutions <strong>of</strong> a MAP titrated suspension to<br />
4670, 2333, 1167, 233 and 117 bacteria per g. DNA extraction <strong>of</strong><br />
each sample spiked was repeat four times using the new protocol<br />
(NP) developed by Adiagene. Briefly, 6g +/- 0.2 g <strong>of</strong> faeces were<br />
placed in a bottle with 40 ml <strong>of</strong> sterile distilled water, mixed 15<br />
seconds and allowed to settle 10 to 20 minutes. 10 ml <strong>of</strong> the<br />
obtained supernatant were transferred on an ADIAFILTER and<br />
centrifuged 5 minutes at 3 000 g. The obtained pellet was<br />
resupended then disrupted 10 minutes at 30 Hz with a mixer mill<br />
and 300 mg <strong>of</strong> glass beads and centrifuge 5 minutes at 15 000 g.<br />
Then DNA was extracted from 200 μl <strong>of</strong> the supernatant.<br />
5µL <strong>of</strong> each DNA solution was analyzed with the ADIAVET ®<br />
PARATB REALTIME PCR kit (Adiagene).<br />
The detection limit <strong>of</strong> the diagnostic method is the smallest<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> MAP per sample generating 100% positive results.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the new protocol on field samples<br />
329 faecal samples were collected from different veterinary<br />
diagnostic laboratories. The common point among these samples<br />
is that they were sent to the laboratory for MAP analyses; they<br />
came from different area, from different herds with or without<br />
history <strong>of</strong> paratuberculosis.<br />
All the samples were analysed in parallel with two DNA extraction<br />
protocols.<br />
This first was performed using Adiapure ®<br />
(Adiagene) DNA<br />
extraction protocol (SP). The analyses were carried out from 1g<br />
<strong>of</strong> faecal sample as recommended by the manufacturer.<br />
The second DNA extraction was realised using the new protocol<br />
(NP). It was achieved with 6g +/- 0.2 g <strong>of</strong> faeces as previously<br />
described.<br />
5 µl <strong>of</strong> the each DNA solution obtained from the 2 different<br />
protocols was analysed with ADIAVET ® PARATB REALTIME kit.<br />
difficult to obtain a good sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the test due to the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> inhibitor and the biology <strong>of</strong> the bacteria.<br />
Foremost, it was important to increase the quantity <strong>of</strong> treated<br />
faecal sample. Most <strong>of</strong> the works done for MAP detection like<br />
culture or PCR treat up to 1g <strong>of</strong> faeces. Even the new technique<br />
combining magnetic beads separation and PCR uses a minimum<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> samples.<br />
The originality <strong>of</strong> our protocol is to be able to treat up to 10g <strong>of</strong><br />
faeces in order to concentrate the MAP present in the sample. In<br />
the standard protocol (SP) the DNA <strong>of</strong> 1g <strong>of</strong> faeces are treated.<br />
After homogenization and DNA purification, 0.15mg are used for<br />
PCR analyse; With the new protocol (NP), 6g are extracted and<br />
15mg <strong>of</strong> feces are used for PCR analyse. So, we are able to<br />
concentrate 100 times the sample and increase the sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
the whole method. Prior study have suggested that high<br />
shedders yield > 50CFU/tube and low shedders
S1 - P - 06<br />
VALIDATION OF REAL-TIME PCR TEST FOR THE DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF COXIELLA<br />
BURNETII FOR ABORTION CONTROL PROGRAM<br />
Leborgne Maëlle 1 , Blanchard Béatrice 1 , Gracieux Patrice 1 , Rouillard Tony 2<br />
1<br />
ADIAGENE, 38 rue de Paris 22000 Saint Brieuc, FRANCE<br />
2<br />
AES CHEMUNEX, Rue Maryse Bastié, 35172 Bruz, FRANCE<br />
Coxiella burnetii, Quantitative PCR, Diagnosis, Zoonosis<br />
Introduction<br />
Q fever, a zoonosis caused by the obligate intracellular bacterium<br />
Coxiella burnetii, is endemic throughout the world and infects<br />
arthropods, birds, pets, domestic and wild mammals, and<br />
humans.<br />
The recent developments in the EU, especially the increase in<br />
confirmed human cases <strong>of</strong> Q fever in the Netherlands, call for<br />
special consideration as regards the risks posed by Q fever for<br />
humans and animals. The European Commission requested<br />
further scientific advices and human risk assessment, as regards<br />
Q fever in animals (1). For EU it’s important to assess the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> Q fever in the EU Member<br />
States for a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the scale and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the disease and infection. In this context, French authorities<br />
organise a national program <strong>of</strong> Q fever surveillance. The control<br />
measures in infected herds consist first in preventing<br />
contamination <strong>of</strong> susceptible animals in reducing Coxiella<br />
shedding in infected ruminants. So, it is necessary to detect and<br />
quantify the amount <strong>of</strong> bacteria in infected samples in order to<br />
eliminate or separate the heaviest shedders from the herds.<br />
To reach this goal it is important to improve and standardize the<br />
diagnostic method in laboratories. We have developed a<br />
quantitative real time PCR test according to the guidelines for the<br />
development and validation <strong>of</strong> veterinary PCR (AFNOR, XP U47-<br />
600-2) (2). The new ADIAVET ® kit was validated by the French<br />
national reference laboratory for Q fever (ANSES, Sophia-<br />
Antipolis, France).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
One-well quantitative real time PCR was developed to detect<br />
simultaneously the C. burnetii IS1111 and a housekeeping gene<br />
GAPDH as an endogenous internal control <strong>of</strong> extraction and<br />
amplification.<br />
The specificity <strong>of</strong> the PCR test was tested against a panel <strong>of</strong><br />
bacteria and virus commonly found in bovine, caprine or ovine<br />
samples.<br />
The detection limit <strong>of</strong> the PCR (LD PCR ) generating a positive result<br />
in 95% <strong>of</strong> cases and the quantification limit <strong>of</strong> the PCR (LQ PCR )<br />
were calculated with a standard genomic DNA solution provided<br />
by the French national reference laboratory for Q fever (ANSES-<br />
Sophia Antipolis).<br />
The national control program recommended to collect vaginal<br />
swabs or placenta swabs after abortion.<br />
Four PCR methods, including DNA extraction from sample and<br />
PCR, were evaluated. The detection limit and the field <strong>of</strong><br />
quantification <strong>of</strong> each method were calculated.<br />
Table 1: Determination <strong>of</strong> the detection limit and <strong>of</strong> the field <strong>of</strong><br />
quantification for each method. The results are expressed in<br />
C.burnetii/ml.<br />
Vaginal<br />
swab<br />
Placenta<br />
swab<br />
QIAamp ® DNA Mini Kit<br />
Detection limit<br />
<strong>of</strong> method<br />
Field <strong>of</strong><br />
quantification<br />
NucleoSpin ® Tissue<br />
Detection limit<br />
<strong>of</strong> method<br />
Field <strong>of</strong><br />
quantification<br />
300 500 à 1.10 6 300 500 à 1.10 6<br />
300 500 à 1.10 6 300 500 à 1.10 6<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
To assess the sanitary status <strong>of</strong> the herds, the animals are<br />
considered as clinically infected if the swab contains more than<br />
10 4 C. burnetii/ml. Thus, the performances <strong>of</strong> the real-time PCR<br />
developed match with the requirements for the management <strong>of</strong><br />
C. burnetii infection.<br />
This quantitative real time PCR test was validated by the French<br />
national reference laboratory for Q fever. Currently, it’s used in<br />
France for a national program <strong>of</strong> Q fever surveillance. In addition,<br />
this kit may be also used for the epidemiologic diagnostic <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
Burnetii in faeces, milk, tissues and foetal liquid.<br />
References<br />
1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2010). Panel on Animal<br />
Health and Welfare (AHAW): More, S., Stegeman, al. Scientific Opinion on<br />
Q Fever. EFSA Journal, 8(5):1595. [114 pp.].<br />
doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1595. May.<br />
2. AFNOR XP U47-600-2 (juin 2011), Méthodes d’analyse en santé<br />
animale – PCR (réaction de polymérisation en chaîne) - Partie 2 :<br />
exigences et recommandations pour le développement et la validation de<br />
la PC<br />
Results<br />
This PCR test was assessed against a panel <strong>of</strong> 130 samples<br />
issues from organisms preferencially found in the same ecologic<br />
niche and/or close phylogeneticaly, among which Legionella. No<br />
cross reaction was observed.<br />
The analysis Probit showed that LD PCR was to 1.5 Genome<br />
Equivalent/reaction (5µL). LQ PCR was calculated to 2 Genome<br />
Equivalent/reaction (5µL).<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>of</strong> different methods are showed in<br />
the following table.
S1 - P - 07<br />
ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF A SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUS PCR ON AVIAN SAMPLES<br />
J. C. Pedersen 1 , C. Boss 2 , A. Burrell 3 , C. O’Connell 3<br />
1<br />
National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL), Ames, Iowa. USA<br />
2<br />
Life Technologies,Darmstadt, Germany<br />
3<br />
Life Technologies, Austin, USA<br />
Introduction<br />
Swine influenza is a highly contagious viral infection <strong>of</strong> pigs that<br />
has a significant economic impact on affected herds. The disease<br />
is caused by Swine Influenza Virus (SIV) which is a group <strong>of</strong><br />
specified viruses that are members <strong>of</strong> the family<br />
Orthomyxoviridae and placed in the genus influenzavirus A.<br />
Pigs play a unique role in the ecology <strong>of</strong> Influenza Type A, in that<br />
they have receptors in their respiratory tract that will bind swine,<br />
human, and avian influenza viruses. Consequently, pigs have<br />
been called the ‘mixing vessels’ for the development <strong>of</strong> new<br />
influenza viruses when swine, avian, and/or human influenza<br />
viruses undergo genetic reassortment in pigs. Subtypes <strong>of</strong> SIV<br />
that are most frequently identified in pigs include classical and<br />
avian H1N1, human (hu) H1N1 and H1N2, reassortant (r) H3N2,<br />
and rH1N2.<br />
In theory, a PCR based test which detects RNA coding for the<br />
matrix and nucleoprotein genes <strong>of</strong> SIV, an Influenzavirus A,<br />
should be able to detect similar viral RNA sequences in avian<br />
samples. The USDA licensed Swine Influenza Virus RNA Test Kit<br />
(VetMAX ® -Gold SIV Detection Kit) was used to test RNA<br />
extracted from a panel <strong>of</strong> clinical Avian Influenza Virus samples<br />
representing all 16 HA subtypes in order to assess the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the test in species other than swine.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A panel <strong>of</strong> 34 cultured isolates (stock virus) representing all 16<br />
HA Influenzavirus A subtypes was assembled at the NVSL. RNA<br />
was extracted from the samples using the MagMAX ® Viral RNA<br />
Isolation Kit following manufactures’ instructions. Undiluted RNA<br />
extracted from the stock viruses was tested using the VetMAX ® -<br />
Gold SIV Detection Kit real time PCR from Life Technologies<br />
following the product insert instructions. The test detects RNA<br />
representing two different targets on the SIV matrix gene as well<br />
as an additional target on the nucleoprotein gene.<br />
Results<br />
Strong amplification signals were obtained (Ct range: 13.2-20.9)<br />
for each <strong>of</strong> the panel members tested. The quality standards<br />
including positive and negative extraction conotrols, positive kit<br />
control and no template controls performed as expected.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This preliminary study gives an indication that further validation<br />
studies are warranted to support additional claims for use <strong>of</strong> this<br />
product for the detection <strong>of</strong> Influenzavirus A in avian samples.<br />
On a global level, the use diagnostic assays for the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
certain reportable diseases is becoming more highly regulated in<br />
order to ensure that clinical decisions are being made from high<br />
quality laboratory results. In light <strong>of</strong> this, the advantages listed<br />
above must be understood along with the limitations <strong>of</strong> these<br />
reported data.<br />
Limitations: The VetMAX ® -Gold SIV Detection Kit is a USDA<br />
licensed product for the detection <strong>of</strong> Swine Influenza Virus (SIV)<br />
RNA isolated from nasal swab samples. Off-label uses <strong>of</strong> the<br />
product in the United States are not supported by the<br />
manufacturer and any additional claims for performance <strong>of</strong> the kit<br />
must be supported by rigorous studies which must be submitted<br />
and approved by the USDA before any additional claims can be<br />
made in the US. Usage claims in other countries outside the US<br />
are subject to the regulatory requirement(s) within each country<br />
<strong>of</strong> use.<br />
References<br />
OIE Terrestrial Manual 2010, Chapter 2.8.8. Swine Influenza, accessed 30<br />
Mar <strong>2012</strong><br />
SIV, PCR, Avian Samples
S1 - P - 08<br />
QUALITY CONTROL OF PRRSV VACCINATION BY PARAMETERS OF IMMUNITY<br />
Böttcher J 1 , Janowetz B 1 , Alex M 1 , Seidenspinner M 2 , Schuh H 2 , Strutzberg-Minder K 3 , Wendt M 4 , Leibold W 5<br />
1<br />
Bavarian Animal Health Service, Poing, Germany,<br />
2<br />
Dr. Hermann Schuh, Veterinary Practice, Ipsheim, Germany<br />
3<br />
IVD GmbH, Hannover, Germany,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, 4 Klinik für kleine Klauentiere, 5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Immunology, Hannover, Germany<br />
PRRS, vaccination, immunity<br />
Introduction<br />
Control <strong>of</strong> porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)<br />
mainly relies on vaccination. Quality control <strong>of</strong> vaccination should<br />
focus on diagnostic parameters which are associated with<br />
immunity, i.e. neutralizing antibodies (nab) and Interferon-gamma<br />
(IFN-γ) response. The level <strong>of</strong> maternally derived nabs (MDNab)<br />
has to be included as an additional variable.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Six sows were tested for nabs 2 weeks (w) post partum. Piglets<br />
were classified by MDNab in “0.05, i.e. the lowest<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the IFN-γ-standard titration, or OD SC = 4<br />
< 4<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
vaccination group<br />
NT_US<br />
0<br />
Fig.2: Genotype-specificity <strong>of</strong> NT (n=58) and IFN-γ (n=29) in w27.<br />
Interferon-gamma (ng/ml)<br />
1000<br />
100<br />
10<br />
IFN_EU<br />
Vaccination group 2<br />
IFN_US<br />
Fig.3: PRRSV-EU-IFN-γresponse.<br />
Data for 12, 4, 1<br />
and 8 piglets are shown for<br />
groups 1, 2, 3 and 4,<br />
respectively. Groups 2 and<br />
3 showed marked IFN-γresponse<br />
against Marc145<br />
(NC). The effect <strong>of</strong> MDNab<br />
in group 1 was significant<br />
(p=0.036, Mann-Whitneytest,<br />
two-tailed probability).<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was financially supported by the Free State <strong>of</strong> Bavaria and the<br />
Bavarian Joint Founding Scheme for the Control and Eradication <strong>of</strong> contagious<br />
Livestock Diseases. This study was performed as a part <strong>of</strong> the thesis <strong>of</strong> Mr. Marc<br />
Seidenspinner.<br />
References<br />
1. Böttcher, J., M. Ritzmann, A. Gangl (2006): Felduntersuchungen mit einem<br />
„Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus“ (PRRSV)<br />
Neutralisationstest. Tierärztl. Umschau, 61, 550 – 559.<br />
Neutralization titer (PRRSV EU)<br />
Neutralization titer (PRRSV EU)<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Nab-titer <strong>of</strong> sows<br />
>= 4<br />
= 4<br />
< 4<br />
2 7 10 13 16 21 25 26 27<br />
weeks <strong>of</strong> life
S1 - P - 09<br />
PTS FOR BVDV ANTIGEN DETECTION BY GD - ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICE<br />
Rianne Buter 1 , Jet Mars 1 , Wim Swart 1 , Huub van de Sande 1 , Kees van Maanen 1<br />
1<br />
GD-Animal Health Service, Diagnostics,Research and Epidemiology,Deventer , the Netherlands<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests, nucleic acid amplification techniques, ISO/IEC 17043:2010, BVDV, PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Quality control should be an integral element in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> nucleic acid amplification techniques (NATs)<br />
e.g. PCR in diagnostic laboratories. Dealing with test<br />
characteristics like specificity and sensitivity, variations in<br />
qualitative and quantitative results, contamination and inhibition<br />
control mechanisms remains an on-going challenge. External<br />
quality controls are a useful tool to improve a laboratories quality<br />
system.<br />
At this moment ,different pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests for nucleic amplification<br />
techniques (NAT’s) e.g.PCR are available at GD, such as for<br />
Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV), mastitis pathogens,<br />
Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV-2), Porcine Reproductive and<br />
Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) and Brachyspira<br />
hyodysenteriae.<br />
In general, the purpose <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing is to determine the<br />
performances <strong>of</strong> individual laboratories for specific tests. All PTS<br />
organized by GD are performed according to ISO/IEC<br />
17043:2010 guidelines. This abstract presents the (anonimized)<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the BVDV antigen and genome detection PTS that was<br />
organized in 2011.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The BVDV antigen detection PTS consisted <strong>of</strong> 11 inactivated,<br />
freeze-dried sera and 1 inactivated and freeze dried tissue<br />
sample, which were sent to each <strong>of</strong> the participants with the<br />
request to test the samples for BVDV antigen/genome using all<br />
PCR and antigen ELISA techniques in operation at the time. The<br />
samples were identified by sample numbers (#1 - #12) only.<br />
Before shipment homogeneity and stability <strong>of</strong> the samples were<br />
checked. The samples were sent by TNT courier to participants<br />
all over the world but mainly in Europe and the deadline for<br />
testing and reporting was 6 weeks. The participants were asked<br />
to analyse the samples in duplicate in two different test runs.<br />
Results<br />
Statistical calculations were performed when there were at least<br />
6 laboratories participating within one test system. The boxplot<br />
represents the measurements for each sample <strong>of</strong> all laboratories<br />
participating in a commercial BVD ag ELISA (figure 1) and the<br />
XY-diagram represents the average z-scores <strong>of</strong> all laboratories<br />
using the commercial ELISA. (figure 2)<br />
Figure 1 BVDV ELISA boxplot<br />
For the BVDV real time PCR only the within lab reproducibility<br />
could be calculated (table 1), since there were too many<br />
differences in RNA isolation methods, PCR mixtures, PCR<br />
cyclers e.g.<br />
Table 1: BVDV Real-time PCR within-lab-reproducibility<br />
Lab<br />
Mean value<br />
Within Lab<br />
reproducibility sd<br />
A 28.20 0.10<br />
B 36.15 2.39<br />
C 28.85 1.54<br />
D 30.66 1.53<br />
E 30.96 0.19<br />
F 29.78 0.24<br />
G* 37.25 .<br />
H 30.54 0.39<br />
I 32.18 0.24<br />
J 28.53 0.37<br />
K 29.29 0.95<br />
M 30.27 2.29<br />
N* 29.03 .<br />
O 29.84 0.41<br />
P 30.11 1.48<br />
Q 28.36 0.44<br />
R 29.23 0.87<br />
S 30.94 0.60<br />
Labs marked with * reported only single results.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
In this PTS specificity did not seem to be a problem for both<br />
ELISA and PCR, since almost all labs scored a BVDV negative<br />
sample and a serum sample spiked with a heterologous RNA<br />
virus correctly negative.<br />
Detection limits <strong>of</strong> the ELISAs used in this PTS, as measured by<br />
TCID 50 /mL, were relatively high with all spiked samples up to a<br />
titre <strong>of</strong> 10 4,05 TCID 50 /mL being scored negative by all participants.<br />
Also (maternal) antibodies can interfere with virus detection by<br />
ELISA, as demonstrated by the results for samples #6 and #10.<br />
Since such interference does not occur with PCR, critical<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> discrepant test results is always needed when PCR<br />
and ELISA are both used in the context <strong>of</strong> BVDV diagnosis and<br />
compulsory or voluntary control and eradication programmes.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the laboratories that participated in this PTS used realtime<br />
PCR for BVDV detection. The detection limit <strong>of</strong> real-time and<br />
conventional PCRs as compared with the antigen detection<br />
ELISAs used in this PTS is much lower as demonstrated by the<br />
fact that allmost all serum samples spiked with BVDV-1 virus with<br />
a titre <strong>of</strong> 10 1,9 TCID50/mL or higher scored positive. The overall<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the laboratories that participated in this first GD BVDV<br />
antigen and genome PTS were reasonably good. Most labs have<br />
reliable assays in place for detection <strong>of</strong> BVDV PI-animals.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank our product-sales manager Annemiek Slothouber for<br />
her support and enthusiasm.<br />
We thank all participants for their enthusiasm, their quick<br />
response and their valuable comments.<br />
Figure 2 BVDV ELISA scatterplot
S1 - P - 10<br />
PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL PROFICIENCY TEST FOR THE SEROLOGICAL<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF EQUINE INFECTIOUS ANEMIA CONDUCTED IN ITALY BETWEEN 2006-2010.<br />
Ricci I 1 , Gasperetti L. 1 , D'Alonzo A. 1 , Nardini R. 1 , Giusti C. 1 , Caprioli A. 1 , Forletta R. 1 .<br />
1<br />
National reference centre for equine infectious Anemia, Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Lazio e Toscana<br />
Keywords: Equine infectious anemia, agar gel immunodiffusion, pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test<br />
Introduction<br />
Equine infection anemia (EIA) is a viral infection <strong>of</strong> equidae,<br />
caused by a virus (EIAV) <strong>of</strong> the Lentivirus genus, Retroviridae<br />
family. Since 2006, Italy has adopted a national surveillance plan<br />
based on the serological screening <strong>of</strong> all animals older than 6<br />
months except for meat horses. According to the Italian<br />
Regulations, the <strong>of</strong>ficial confirmatory test is the agar gel<br />
immunodiffusion (AGID), which detects antibodies against the<br />
p26, a highly conserved and primary immunogenic structural<br />
protein <strong>of</strong> the virus (1). The serological analysis <strong>of</strong> the samples,<br />
collected for the surveillance plan, can only be performed by the<br />
network <strong>of</strong> the national <strong>of</strong>ficial laboratories, belonging to the<br />
Isitituti Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattici Sperimentali, mostly operating according to<br />
the ISO IEC 17025 and annually participating to pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests.<br />
In this context, since 2002, the national reference centre for<br />
equine infectious anemia (CRAIE) has conducted inter-laboratory<br />
agid pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests (2) with an increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
participating laboratories.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to present and discuss the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests conducted in Italy during the years 2006-2010<br />
for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> EIA using the AGID test.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Over the period 2006-2010, 65 laboratories participated to the<br />
annual pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test, performing both methods prescribed for<br />
AGID for AIE: “the Coggins test” which uses two layers <strong>of</strong> agar<br />
(1.5% and 0.7% respectively and wells <strong>of</strong> 7mm in diameter and 3<br />
mm apart) and the OIE prescribed by the OIE (3). The panel<br />
distributed to each laboratory was each year made up <strong>of</strong> 10 sera,<br />
3 negatives and 7 positives, with different level <strong>of</strong> antibodies<br />
against the P26 antigen (high to weak positives). Only in 2008,<br />
the panel was constituted <strong>of</strong> 2 negative and 8 positive sera.<br />
Before dispatching the samples to each laboratory, they were<br />
subjected to homogeneity and stability tests for their reactivity (2),<br />
so as to correctly evaluate reproducibility and repeatability<br />
parameters. Statistical analysis was carried out using K Cohen<br />
statistic, which was calculated for each laboratory and for all<br />
laboratories gathered together (4).<br />
Results<br />
Of the 65 participating laboratories, 27 constantly had a K value<br />
equal to 1. The results <strong>of</strong> the different laboratories per year are<br />
reported in table 1.<br />
Table 1: K value results per year.<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the 65 laboratories per year<br />
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />
N. <strong>of</strong> laboratories<br />
0.21-0.40 8 1 2 1 0<br />
0.42-0.60 5 0 0 0 1<br />
0.61-0.80 7 2 0 2 1<br />
0.81-1 45 62 63 62 63<br />
K Value<br />
On the other hand when considering the samples not correctly<br />
identified (K < 1) in both methods for all laboratories, those<br />
mostly misclassified were weak positive, 7.6%, against the 1.4%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the strong positive sera.<br />
When taking into account the concordance <strong>of</strong> samples for the two<br />
different methods, the percentages <strong>of</strong> error for different AGID<br />
methods were respectively 5.2 for the Coggins test and 3.8 for<br />
the OIE method.<br />
The K analysis conducted to evaluate the concordance among<br />
the different laboratories for each year is reported in table 2. The<br />
results using the two different AGID methods are not significantly<br />
different.<br />
Table 2: K value results for all raters per year using both AGID<br />
methods.<br />
K value results among the raters per year<br />
YEAR 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />
AGID Coggins 0.78 0.94 1 0.94 0.95<br />
AGID OIE 0.77 0.98 1 0.97 0.98<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The constant increase <strong>of</strong> participating laboratories to the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests during the years is an important element for<br />
evaluating the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the diagnostic system at national level<br />
for detecting EIA infection. These results stress the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
performing such trials to achieve efficient diagnostic standards for<br />
each <strong>of</strong>ficial laboratory as well as for the national diagnostic<br />
network.<br />
Furthermore, the increase in the number <strong>of</strong> laboratories during<br />
the years, having a K value > 0.8, demonstrates an improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the diagnostic performances, as also the achievement <strong>of</strong> good<br />
quality standards, with very satisfactory reproducibility and<br />
repeatability parameters for both AGID tests, even if better for the<br />
AGID OIE. It is important to underline that some difficulties<br />
occurred in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> positive samples with lower<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> antibody against the p26 antigen (weak positive sera).<br />
This represents a problem especially because this error during<br />
routine performance is expected to be higher in consideration <strong>of</strong><br />
an expected higher attention in reading a pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test. This<br />
may constitute a potential bias <strong>of</strong> the results obtained, generating<br />
the calculation <strong>of</strong> a better pr<strong>of</strong>iciency than the effective.<br />
In this respect it our opinion that a more sensible technique such<br />
as the ELISA should be introduced to improve the efficacy and<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> the surveillance system. The introduction <strong>of</strong> such a<br />
screening test, with its characteristic <strong>of</strong> high sensitivity, rapidity<br />
and objectiveness is surely a more useful instrument for the<br />
laboratories performing EIA diagnosis, especially within an <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
surveillance and control programme. Another important issue<br />
emerging from our results is that the laboratories having lower<br />
level <strong>of</strong> concordance were those testing fewer samples in their<br />
diagnostic routine. This further remarks the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experience in the execution and interpretation <strong>of</strong> a test such as<br />
the AGID.<br />
References<br />
1. Ordinanza 8 agosto 2010 Piano di sorveglianza nazionale per l'anemia<br />
infettiva degli equidi. G.U. Serie Generale n. 219 del 18 settembre 2010<br />
2. Guidelines OIE 1998. Guidelines <strong>of</strong> the Office International des<br />
Epizooties for laboratory quality evaluation, for international reference<br />
standards for antibody assays and for laboratory pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing. Rev.<br />
Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 17 (2), 600-609<br />
3. Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2010,<br />
Chapter 2 . 5 . 6 .Equine infectious anaemia<br />
4. Langton S.D., Chevennement R., Nagelkerke N., Lombard B., 2002.<br />
Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative microbiological methods:<br />
accordance and concordance. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology<br />
79: pp. 175-181<br />
5. Charles J. Issel, R. Frank Cook (1993)REVIEW ARTICLE A review <strong>of</strong><br />
techniques for the serologic diagnosis <strong>of</strong> equine infectious anemia J Vet<br />
Diagn Invest 5: 137-141
S1 - P - 11<br />
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF AVIBACTERIUM (HAEMOPHILUS) PARAGALLINARUM<br />
ISOLATES RECOVERED IN THE RUSSIAN TERRITORY<br />
A.V. Chernyshov 1 , O.I. Ruchnova 1 , O.P. B’yadovskaya 1<br />
1 FGBI ARRIAH, Vladimir, Russian Federation<br />
Avibacterium paragallinarum, Haemophilus paragallinarum, Infectious Coryza, antimicrobial susceptibility<br />
Introduction<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most widely spread respiratory infectious diseases<br />
is infectious coryza. The disease is caused by the Gramnegative<br />
bacterium <strong>of</strong> Avibacterium paragallinarum species<br />
previously known as Haemophilus paragallinarum (1, 2, 5).<br />
The disease belongs to highly contagious diseases. It is<br />
manifested by catarrhal inflammation <strong>of</strong> nasal mucosa and air<br />
cells, as well as by the swollen-head-like syndrome and in rare<br />
cases by pneumonia. Chicks and chickens are susceptible to<br />
infectious coryza. Economic losses are caused by the stunting<br />
<strong>of</strong> chicks (up to (10-40%), drop in egg production (up to 41%)<br />
and mortality (up to 10%). (1, 5)<br />
Avian infectious coryza is reported from many countries <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world (2, 5).<br />
Currently, different antibacterial preparations are used in<br />
industrial poultry production but the violation <strong>of</strong> requirements to<br />
their use can lead to the emergence <strong>of</strong> resistant bacterial<br />
strains. Therefore, study <strong>of</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong> microorganisms to<br />
antibiotics has a vital significance for the bacterial infection<br />
therapy.<br />
The present work was focused on the study <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility pattern A. paragallinarum field isolates from<br />
poultry from the RF farms.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Pieces <strong>of</strong> lungs, tracheal and infraorbital sinus washings<br />
received from poultry <strong>of</strong> different age between 2009-2011 were<br />
tested for the presence <strong>of</strong> infectious coryza agent. Thirty-five<br />
A. paragallinarum field isolates were used in the given study.<br />
A. paragallinarum was identified based on the results <strong>of</strong><br />
studying morphological, cultural, biochemical and genetic<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> the isolates (1, 2, 5).<br />
Susceptibility to antimicrobial preparations was determined<br />
using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% <strong>of</strong> sheep red<br />
blood cells by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test (4) using a kit <strong>of</strong><br />
disks impregnated with different antibiotics (Research Center<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pharmacotherapy, St. Petersburg). The degree <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance <strong>of</strong> the isolates was determined according to the<br />
instruction to the kit.<br />
Results<br />
During 2009-2011 224 samples <strong>of</strong> pathological materials from<br />
broiler chicks and chickens were tested for avian infectious<br />
coryza. Total 35 isolates <strong>of</strong> A. paragallinarum were isolated<br />
from chickens and broiler chicks including 57.1% <strong>of</strong> isolates<br />
from infraorbital sinus swabs, 34.3% - from lung and 8.6% -<br />
from tracheal swabs.<br />
The recovered bacteria possessed tinctorial, morphologic,<br />
cultural and biochemical properties typical <strong>of</strong> A. paragallinarum<br />
and consistent with Bergey’s manual <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />
bacteriology and works by P.J. Blackall [et al.] (1, 2).<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> A. paragallinarum susceptibility to<br />
antibacterial preparations are presented in Table 1.<br />
It was established that most isolates <strong>of</strong> A. paragallinarum were<br />
characterized by a wide range <strong>of</strong> resistance to antibacterial<br />
preparations. In particular, to lincosamide group (clindamycin)<br />
(94.5%), tetracycline (tetracycline (82.9%), doxycycline<br />
(87.9%)), co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim) (82.9%), natural<br />
penicillins (benzylpenicillin) (82.9%), third generation<br />
cephalosporins (cefixime) (71.4 %), second generation<br />
fluoroquinolones (<strong>of</strong>loxacin (60 %), cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin (intermediate<br />
susceptibility 42.9 % <strong>of</strong> isolates), norfloxacin (51.4 %)) and<br />
macrolide group (erythromycin) (62.9 %).<br />
A. paragallinarum isolates had high susceptibility mainly to<br />
inhibitor-protected penicillins (amoxicillin<br />
clavulanate/amoxiclav) – 77.1% <strong>of</strong> strains, first and second<br />
generation aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin<br />
respectively) and nitr<strong>of</strong>uran group (furadonin) – more than 60<br />
%.<br />
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility <strong>of</strong> A, paragallinarum<br />
isolates. Number <strong>of</strong> isolates in % <strong>of</strong> total number. R –<br />
resistant, S – susceptible, I – intermediate susceptibility.<br />
No. Antibiotic name S I R<br />
1 Ofloxacin 34,3 5,7 60,0<br />
2 Cipr<strong>of</strong>loxacin 31,4 42,9 25,7<br />
3 Norfloxacin 34,3 14,3 51,4<br />
4 Lev<strong>of</strong>loxacin 34,3 22,9 42,9<br />
5 Tetracycline 0,0 17,1 82,9<br />
6 Doxycycline 12,1 0,0 87,9<br />
7 Clindamycin 0,0 5,7 94,3<br />
8 Trimethoprim 17,1 0,0 82,9<br />
9 Benzylpenicillin 17,1 0,0 82,9<br />
10 Amoxiclav 77,1 5,7 17,1<br />
11 Ampicillin 28,6 25,7 45,7<br />
12 Laevomycetin 62,9 17,1 20,0<br />
13 Erythromycin 5,7 31,4 62,9<br />
14 Gentamicin 60,0 22,9 17,1<br />
15 Amikacin 65,7 22,9 11,4<br />
16 Furadonin 57,1 25,7 17,1<br />
17 Cefuroxime 48,6 17,1 34,3<br />
18 Cefoperazone 48,6 22,9 28,6<br />
19 Сefixime 11,4 17,1 71,4<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
A high rate <strong>of</strong> resistance to erythromycin (62,9%) in our<br />
research according with Yuan-Man Hsu [et. al.] (1) results. He<br />
also marked the resistance <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> tested field strains<br />
to this preparation. Data on tetracycline resistance are similar to<br />
P. J. Blackall (4) investigations.<br />
Our investigation, on the contrary, demonstrated high<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> isolates resistant to aminopenicillin, erythromycin<br />
and benzylpenicillin in contrast to the results presented by E.S.<br />
Vargas and H.R. Terzolo (10).<br />
In conclusion, A. paragallinarum isolates have wide resistance<br />
range to large spectrum <strong>of</strong> antimicrobials, in particular<br />
tetracyclines (82.9 %), lincosamides (94.3 %), co-trimoxazole<br />
(82.9 %), natural penicillines (82.9 %). The majority <strong>of</strong> bacteria<br />
were susceptible to aminoglycosides (57.1 %), laevomycetin<br />
(62.9 %), inhibitor-protected penicillins (77.1 %) and nitr<strong>of</strong>urans<br />
(57.1 %).<br />
These data on antibiotic resistance should be helpful in<br />
planning strategies for the control <strong>of</strong> A. paragallinarum infection<br />
in poultry.<br />
References<br />
1. Blackall, P.J. (1989) The Avian Haemophili. Clin. Microbiology<br />
Reviews. Vol.2(3). P. 270-277.<br />
2. Blackall, P.J. (1999) Infectious Coryza: Overview <strong>of</strong> the disease and<br />
new diagnostic options. Clin. Microbiology Reviews. Vol. 12, №4. P. 627-<br />
632.<br />
3. Hsu, Y.-M., Shieh, H.K., Chen, W.-H. [et al.] (2007) Antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility, plasmid pr<strong>of</strong>iles and haemocin activities <strong>of</strong> Avibacterium<br />
paragallinarum strains. Vet. Microbiology. Vol.124. P. 209–218.<br />
4. Jorgensen, J.H., Turnidge, J.D. (2007) Susceptibility test methods:<br />
dilution and disk diffusion methods. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H.<br />
Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.), Manual <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
microbiology, 9th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. P. 1152–1172.<br />
5. Vargas, E.S., Terzolo, H.R. (2004) Haemophilus paragallinarum:<br />
Etiology <strong>of</strong> infectious coryza. Vet. Mex. Vol. 35, №3. P. 245–259.
S1 - P - 12<br />
COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY OF RABIES VIRUS ISOLATION IN<br />
NEUROBLASTOMA CELL CULTURE WITH ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY OF MOUSE INOCULATION<br />
TEST<br />
E.V. Chernyshova 1 , N.A. Nazarov 1 , A.E. Metlin 1<br />
1 FGBI "Federal Centre for Animal Health"(FGBI "ARRIAH"), Vladimir, Russian FederationRabies,<br />
diagnosis, virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell culture, mouse inoculation test, analytical sensitivity<br />
Introduction<br />
Rabies is an acute viral zoonotic infection characterized by<br />
lesions <strong>of</strong> the central nervous system impairment which almost<br />
always results in death.<br />
The main scheme <strong>of</strong> rabies laboratory diagnosis in animals<br />
adopted in the Russian Federation (RF) (State Standard 26075-<br />
84) consists <strong>of</strong> pathological material testing (brain tissue) using<br />
fluorescent antibody test (FAT). When FAT is negative mouse<br />
inoculation test (MIT) should be carried out (4).<br />
In laboratories with appropriate conditions and staff competence<br />
the OIE recommends using virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell<br />
culture instead <strong>of</strong> MIT (2). The reasons for such a<br />
recommendation are the following:<br />
Both methods are <strong>of</strong> high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity;<br />
Minimum and maximum time for diagnosis using virus isolation in<br />
neuroblastoma cell culture is from 4 to 12 days respectively and<br />
MIT performance takes from 12 to 30 days in average;<br />
It is necessary to confirm the results <strong>of</strong> MIT using FAT in addition;<br />
Virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell culture is more humane and<br />
less cost-consuming.<br />
In the EU countries when FAT is negative the virus isolation in<br />
cell culture is performed only in case <strong>of</strong> animal-human contact<br />
(France, Germany). In some countries (Lithuania) in case <strong>of</strong><br />
absence <strong>of</strong> such contacts pathological materials are just<br />
passaged once in cell culture.<br />
Currently, many regional veterinary laboratories <strong>of</strong> the RF are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> running diagnostic tests using cultural methods.<br />
Introduction the “Methodical instructions on rabies virus isolation<br />
in mouse neuroblastoma cell culture” into veterinary laboratory<br />
practice in the RF is <strong>of</strong> great importance.<br />
The study is aimed at the comparison <strong>of</strong> analytical sensitivity<br />
between methods <strong>of</strong> rabies virus isolation in cell culture and<br />
rabies virus isolation in white mice (1, 3).<br />
neuroblastoma cell culture. As for our experiments, the difference<br />
was 1 lg10.<br />
Thus, our results provide one more basis to replace a<br />
MIT the method <strong>of</strong> rabies virus isolation in mouse neuroblastoma<br />
cell culture in laboratories and research institutions dealing with<br />
rabies diagnosis.<br />
References<br />
1. Anthony R. Fooks. New Diagnostic Tools for Rabies in Animals (2009)<br />
http://www.oie.int/eng/A_RABIES/presentations_rage/S21%20NewDiagno<br />
sticTools_Pr<strong>of</strong>Fooks.pdf 40 p.<br />
2. OIE. Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals.<br />
Vol. 1. – 6nd ed. - Paris, (2008). - Chap. 2.1.13. - p. 304-323.<br />
3. Rabies General Aspects &Laboratory DiagnosticTechniques (2007)<br />
http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/Communicable_Diseases_Rabies_-<br />
General_Aspects_&_Laboratory_Diagnostic_Techniques.pdf 72 p.<br />
4. State Standard 26075-84 Methods <strong>of</strong> laboratory diagnosis for rabies<br />
(1984), 9 p.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The following materials were used for the study: mouse<br />
neuroblastoma N-2a cell line; white outbred mice (6-8 g); mouse<br />
brain-adapted rabies virus (CVS strain; 5.66 lg TCID 50 /ml); antirabies<br />
fluorescent immunoglobulin produced by the FGBI<br />
“ARRIAH”.<br />
Analytical sensitivities <strong>of</strong> the methods were determined by<br />
titration <strong>of</strong> rabies virus CVS strain in mouse neuroblastoma N-2a<br />
cell line and in white mice.<br />
The titre was expressed as the highest virus dilution at<br />
which specific fluorescence in cell culture or deaths <strong>of</strong> mice were<br />
observed.<br />
Specific deaths <strong>of</strong> mice were confirmed by FAT.<br />
Results<br />
A 10% suspension <strong>of</strong> original mouse-brain-adapted CVS strain <strong>of</strong><br />
rabies virus was prepared in RPMI medium for inoculation.<br />
Rabies virus was preliminary titrated using a series <strong>of</strong> tenfold<br />
dilutions <strong>of</strong> the prepared suspension. The highest dilution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus suspension with the specific fluorescence corresponded to<br />
1.66 lg TCID50/ml titer.<br />
In order to determine sensitivity more accurately five tw<strong>of</strong>old<br />
dilutions <strong>of</strong> the virus suspension with 1.66 lg TCID50/ml titer were<br />
prepared. Test results demonstrated that the last dilution with the<br />
specific fluorescence corresponded to 1.358 TCID50/ml titer.<br />
Seven tw<strong>of</strong>old dilutions <strong>of</strong> the virus suspension with 2.66<br />
TCID50/ml titer were prepared to determine sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the MIT.<br />
Test results demonstrated that the last dilution accompanied by<br />
specific deaths in mice corresponded to 2.358 TCID50/ml titer.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
A conclusion was made after comparison <strong>of</strong> the obtained results<br />
that the MIT had a lower analytical sensitivity in comparison to<br />
analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> rabies virus isolation in mouse
S1 - P - 13<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF GLOBICATELLA SANGUINIS ISOLATED FROM PNEUMONIA IN A GOAT<br />
M. Cocchi , S. Deotto, T. Di Giusto, M. Bregoli<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Sezione territoriale di Udine, Basaldella di Camp<strong>of</strong>ormido (UD), Italy<br />
Globicatella sanguinis, pneumonia, goat<br />
Introduction<br />
Globicatella (G.) sanguinis was described in 1992. This<br />
bacterium is a catalase-negative, facultative anaerobic, gram<br />
positive coccus. It has been associated with various diseases in<br />
humans, such as bacteraemia, meningitis and infections <strong>of</strong> the<br />
urinary tract. In veterinary medicine, G. sanguinis was described<br />
in meningoencephalitis in lambs (1, 3). The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was<br />
to describe an episode <strong>of</strong> pneumonia in a goat produced by G.<br />
sanguinis.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Two 1-year-old Tibetan goats out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> four goats<br />
belonging to a farm located in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (North<br />
east <strong>of</strong> Italy) showed unspecific clinical signs such as anorexia,<br />
depression, and permanent decubitus. These goats died after<br />
four days by the onset <strong>of</strong> the symptoms, and one <strong>of</strong> them was<br />
submitted for a necropsy. Bacteriological examinations were<br />
performed from lungs, brain and liver as follows: swabs were<br />
streaked onto blood agar base (BAB) and eosin-methylene blue<br />
agar (EMB). Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) was inoculated, too.<br />
Plates and tubes were incubated at 371°C for 48 hrs, in<br />
aerobiosis. BAB was incubated in anaerobic condition, too. From<br />
intestine a Perfringens agar base (PAB) other than EMB plate<br />
was used, incubated in anaerobiosis. It was obtained by using<br />
ANAEROGEN System, with an anaerobic indicator (Oxoid).<br />
Depending on morphology <strong>of</strong> the colonies, Gram staining,<br />
catalase and oxidase tests were performed. Miniaturized<br />
commercial tests were also used for identification. Agar plates<br />
and tubes were supplied by the service for media <strong>of</strong> the Istituto<br />
Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie. Antimicrobial test was<br />
performed with disk diffusion method, in accordance with Clinical<br />
and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2). Tested<br />
antimicrobials were: penicillin (10 g, Becton Dickinson),<br />
ampicillin (10 g, Becton Dickinson), oxacillin (10 g, Becton<br />
Dickinson), tetracycline (30 g, Oxoid), sulfamethoxazoletrimethropim<br />
(23,75-1,25 g –Oxoid-) and cephalothin (30 g –<br />
Oxoid-). Reading was done using the established diameter for<br />
Streptococcus (S.) spp other than S. pneumoniae.<br />
Results<br />
Necropsy. Macroscopic lesions recovered from lungs referred to<br />
acute bronchopneumonia and tracheal and laryngeal oedema.<br />
Catarrhal enteritis and hepatomegaly were observed, too.<br />
Bacteriological tests. Cultures from lungs and liver revealed pure<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> -haemolytic, pin-pointed (2-3 mm <strong>of</strong> diameter), circular<br />
colonies. Subsequently, analyses revealed a gram positive,<br />
catalase-negative, coccus-shaped organism.<br />
Figure 1 shows the morphology <strong>of</strong> the bacterium after 24 hrs <strong>of</strong><br />
incubation, on BAB. Biochemical identification was performed<br />
with a commercial kit, API rapid ID 32 Strep (Biomerieux). Both<br />
the gram positive strains showed identical biochemical pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />
(22274063110), with a percentage <strong>of</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> 99.9%,<br />
T=0.92. Only fermentation <strong>of</strong> ribose resulted as an atypical test<br />
(negative in our reaction). Cultures from the intestine showed E.<br />
coli and Clostridium perfringens.<br />
Antimicrobial test. G. sanguinis revealed resistance to oxacillin,<br />
and to tetracycline, while it was sensitive to other tested drugs.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Pneumonia is one <strong>of</strong> the most common respiratory problems in<br />
small ruminants throughout the world. In goat herds, pneumonia<br />
increases production costs associated with expensive treatments.<br />
Infectious and non-infectious agents can cause inflammation <strong>of</strong><br />
the lungs. In goats the most frequent causes <strong>of</strong> respiratory<br />
infection and death are Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia<br />
haemolytica. They are commonly found in the upper respiratory<br />
tract <strong>of</strong> healthy goats, too. Transportation stress, viral infections,<br />
parasites, poor management conditions, increase goats'<br />
susceptibility to these agents <strong>of</strong> pneumonia. In our case, the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> G. sanguinis in pure culture from diseased lungs<br />
could be indicative <strong>of</strong> the pathological role <strong>of</strong> this bacterium.<br />
The performed analysis on other organs revealed the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
G. sanguinis in liver, too. Differences are in reference to the<br />
growth in different atmospheres: culture from lungs showed G.<br />
sanguinis both in aerobic and in anaerobic conditions. Cultures<br />
from liver revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> the bacterium only in aerobic<br />
incubation. The fact that all the goats in the farm showed identical<br />
clinical signs is strongly indicative that this bacterium was also<br />
responsible for the pathology in the other goats.<br />
In veterinary medicine, G. sanguinis was isolated in a case <strong>of</strong><br />
suppurative meningoencephalitis in lambs (1). In our case<br />
macroscopic analysis revealed an acute bronchopneumonia. Any<br />
lesion was recovered from the brain.<br />
Regarding identification, in this paper we named the bacterium in<br />
accordance with the pr<strong>of</strong>ile given by a miniaturized system. The<br />
phenotypic findings are consistent with those described for this<br />
bacterium species, except for pyrrolidonil arylamidase test. It is<br />
pertinent to note that G. sanguinis belongs to a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />
Gram-positive, catalase-negative new taxa recently founded in<br />
human and animal clinical samples. Some authors revealed that<br />
misidentification can occur between Aerococcus viridans and G.<br />
sanguinis, because <strong>of</strong> very similar biochemical pr<strong>of</strong>iles (1,5).<br />
Moreover, looking into literature only a few number <strong>of</strong> isolates<br />
were tested, with some differences in the results (1,3). For these<br />
reasons, subsequent investigations using different methods, such<br />
as molecular genetic tools should accompany the identification <strong>of</strong><br />
this bacterium.<br />
The improvement <strong>of</strong> the identification systems <strong>of</strong> these unusual<br />
gram-positive, catalase-negative bacteria may contribute to<br />
making progress in current epidemiological knowledge on host<br />
distribution and range <strong>of</strong> clinical conditions.<br />
Data about antimicrobial susceptibility test showed resistance<br />
varied significantly among the tested strains (5). In our report<br />
resistance to tetracycline does not agree with the data <strong>of</strong><br />
Seegmuller et al (4).<br />
To the author’s knowledge this is the first report about G.<br />
sanguinis in an episode <strong>of</strong> pneumonia in a goat.<br />
References<br />
1. Vela, A.I., Fernandez E., Las Heras A., Lawson, P.A., Dominguez L.,<br />
Collins M.D., and Fernandez-Garayzabal J. (2000). Meningoencephalitis<br />
associated with Globicatella sanguinis infection in lambs. J Clin Microbiol<br />
vol 38, 4254-4255.<br />
2. Clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI). M31-A3. Performance<br />
standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria<br />
isolated from animals. Vol 28. n 8.<br />
3. Collins, M.D., Aguirre, M., Faclam, R.R., Shallcross J., and Williams<br />
A.M. (1992) Globicatella sanguis gen.nov., sp. Nov., a gram-positive<br />
catalase-negative bacterium fropm human sources. J Appl. Bacteriol.<br />
73:433-437.<br />
4. Seegmuller I., Van der Linden M., Heeg C., and Reinert R.R. (2007).<br />
Globicatella sanguinis is ana etiological agent <strong>of</strong> ventriculoperitoneal<br />
shunt-associated meningitis. J Clinical Microbiol. Febb. 666-667.<br />
5. Shewmaker, P.L., Steigerwalt, A.G., Shealey, L., Weyant, R., and<br />
Facklam, R. (2001). DNA relatedness, phenotypic characteristics, and<br />
antimicrobial susceptibilities <strong>of</strong> Globicatella sanguinis strains. J Clinic<br />
Microbiol. Nov 4052-4057.<br />
Figure 1: G. sanguinis after 24h incubation on blood agar base, in<br />
aerobic atmosphere
S1 - P - 14<br />
KAIZEN PROCESS APPLIED AT THE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE OF FACULTÉ DE MÉDICINE<br />
VÉTÉRINAIRE, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTREAL<br />
Estela Cornaglia, Véronique Boyer, Jean-François Brodeur, Guy Fontaine<br />
Université de Montréal, Faculté de médicine vétérinaire, Diagnostic Service, Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada<br />
Continuous improvement, Kaizen<br />
Introduction<br />
The diagnostic service (SD) at the Faculté de medicine<br />
vétérinaire de l’Université de Montréal, include 20 laboratories or<br />
services unities. First line laboratories as bacteriology, virology,<br />
parasitology, clinical pathology, pathology, molecular diagnosis,<br />
serology; and specialized unites as ichtyopathology, food safety,<br />
genomics, wildlife, OIE reference EcL laboratory, Actinobacillus<br />
pleuropneumoniae serology and serotyping.<br />
Our staff is around 90 people, 26 veterinarians and 14<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, among them 19 PhD and 13 graduated ACVP.<br />
Continuous improvement and accreditations are a priority for us<br />
to assure the quality <strong>of</strong> our service. We’ve chosen Kaizen as a<br />
principal tool to realize them.<br />
Kaizen means "continuous improvement" or "change for the<br />
better". It refers to philosophy or practices that focus upon<br />
continuous improvement <strong>of</strong> processes in manufacturing,<br />
engineering, supporting business processes, and management.<br />
It comes from Japan.<br />
Improvement can be broken down between innovation and<br />
Kaizen. Innovation involves a drastic improvement in the<br />
existing process and requires large investments. Kaizen<br />
signifies small improvements as a result <strong>of</strong> coordinated<br />
continuous efforts by all employees. Management works<br />
continuously towards revising the current standards, once they<br />
have been mastered, and establishing higher ones. Kaizen<br />
methodology includes making changes and monitoring results,<br />
then adjusting. Large-scale pre-planning and extensive project<br />
scheduling are replaced by smaller experiments, which can be<br />
rapidly adapted as new improvements are suggested.<br />
Kaizen is a process-oriented thinking versus a result-oriented<br />
thinking. Kaizen concentrates on improving the process rather<br />
than on achieving certain results.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The following Kaizen’s methodologies and concepts were<br />
applied:<br />
- 5S activity. 5S is the name <strong>of</strong> a methodology that uses a list<br />
<strong>of</strong> 5 Japanese words which are seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu<br />
and shitsuke. In English: sorting, straightening, systematic<br />
cleaning, standardizing, and sustaining<br />
- Activities based on teamwork. It involved technicians, support<br />
staff, quality assurance manager, pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and directors<br />
- This small multidisciplinary group worked in improving their<br />
own work environment and productivity.<br />
- This group was guided through the kaizen process by an<br />
external consultant.<br />
- This group prepared a Value Stream Mapping to select<br />
specific areas <strong>of</strong> improvement that would be addressed<br />
through Kaizen events and “just-do-it” activities.<br />
- The consultant facilitated an ideation/brainstorming processes<br />
to identify improvement options and obtained participant<br />
feedback.<br />
- The group reported Kaizen results to all employees and<br />
celebrated success<br />
Figure 1: Workplace before Kaizen<br />
Figure 1: Workplace after Kaizen<br />
Results<br />
Kaizen increased employee satisfaction by added-value activities<br />
and improvement <strong>of</strong> the work environment).<br />
By improving standardized activities and processes, kaizen<br />
eliminated waste (lean manufacturing).<br />
Kaizen process identified expected measurable improvements.<br />
It prepared an action plan with a list <strong>of</strong> activities required to<br />
realize those improvements.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Kaizen process allowed improving work environment and working<br />
distribution. It helped to eliminate waste and to recover time for<br />
value added activities.<br />
References<br />
1. Imai, M (2007). Gemba Kaizen, L’art de manager avec bon sens.
S1 - P - 15<br />
ACCURACY OF PARATUBERCULOSIS ANTIBODY ELISA AT PREDICTING FECAL SHEDDING OF<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS IN CATTLE<br />
Rakel T. Fernández 1 , Carmen Eiras 2 , Carmen Calvo 2 , Ignacio Arnaiz 2 , Fco. Javier Diéguez 1,3<br />
1<br />
Santiago de Compostela University (Veterinary Faculty), Department <strong>of</strong> Anatomy and Animal Production, Lugo, Spain<br />
2<br />
Animal Health and Production Laboratory, Lugo, Spain<br />
3<br />
Santiago de Compostela University (Veterinary Faculty), Institute <strong>of</strong> Food Analysis and Research, Lugo, Spain<br />
Paratuberculosis, bovine, ELISA, fecal culture<br />
Introduction<br />
Paratuberculosis, also called Johne's disease, is chronic<br />
granulomatous enteritis caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp.<br />
paratuberculosis (MAP). This infectious disease has a worldwide<br />
distribution affecting mainly ruminants, both domestic and wild,<br />
but has also been isolated from other animal species. It causes<br />
great economic losses in cattle farming 1 .<br />
ELISA is an essential tool in paratuberculosis control programs,<br />
although bacterial culture remains the reference confirmatory<br />
test. In this line, the aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> the ELISA test as a predictor <strong>of</strong> the MAP fecal<br />
elimination "status" (determined by means <strong>of</strong> fecal culture) <strong>of</strong><br />
individual animals.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study was carried out in Galicia (north-west Spain). Galicia is<br />
the major cattle-farming region <strong>of</strong> Spain. It was responsible for<br />
35% <strong>of</strong> the milk and 12% <strong>of</strong> the beef produced in Spain,<br />
constituting approximately 1.7% <strong>of</strong> the milk and 1.3% <strong>of</strong> the beef<br />
produced in the European Union.<br />
Bacteriological culture was performed in fecal samples from 239<br />
animals that were collected during the period 2007-2010. 181<br />
animals were negative to fecal culture and 58 were culture<br />
positive animals. Serological analysis (ELISA) was also<br />
performed in serum samples from the same animals.<br />
Bacterial culture was performed as described by the World<br />
Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2008) 2 . Briefly, 1 g <strong>of</strong> feces<br />
was added to 20 mL <strong>of</strong> sterile distilled water, and tubes were<br />
shaken for 30 min and then allowed to stand undisturbed for 30<br />
min. Five millilitres <strong>of</strong> the supernatant were added to 0.75%<br />
hexadecylpyridinium chloride (HPC) (Sigma). Tubes were<br />
inverted several times and allowed to stand undisturbed for 18 h<br />
at room temperature for decontamination. Triplicate Herrold’s egg<br />
yolk medium (HEYM) culture slopes containing amphotericin B,<br />
vancomycin and nalidixic acid were inoculated with 0.1 mL <strong>of</strong> the<br />
undisturbed sediment, incubated at 37º C and observed at 2-<br />
week intervals for 16 weeks. Suspect colonies were evaluated for<br />
mycobactin dependence along with morphology and acid-fast<br />
staining. Positive-staining colonies were confirmed by PCR. For<br />
every nine fecal samples a positive control (a positive field<br />
sample) was included.<br />
The ELISA used was “PARATUBERCULOSIS ANTIBODY<br />
SCREENING” (Institute Pourquier, France). False-positive results<br />
were reduced by pre-absorbing the samples with sonicates <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental mycobacterium Mycobacterium phlei. Samples<br />
were considered positive at a % sample:positive ratio <strong>of</strong> 55% or<br />
more.<br />
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure was used to<br />
evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy to estimate the antibody<br />
titer that was the best cut-<strong>of</strong>f point in terms <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and<br />
specificity as a predictor <strong>of</strong> the bacteriological "status" <strong>of</strong> the<br />
animals (culture positive/negative).<br />
Results<br />
The ROC curve -as measure <strong>of</strong> the accuracy <strong>of</strong> ELISA antibody<br />
titers to predict the bacteriological “status”- indicated a good<br />
diagnostic discrimination (Figure 1). The area under the curve<br />
was 0.878. The best overall diagnostic precision was in the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
point 155.7 with sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 84.5% and specificity <strong>of</strong> 78.9%<br />
(Table 1).<br />
Figure 1: ROC curve for overall accuracy <strong>of</strong> antibody titers as a<br />
predictor <strong>of</strong> MAP bacteriological “status”<br />
Table 1: Sensitivities and specificities obtained from ROC<br />
procedure<br />
Cut <strong>of</strong>f point Sensitivity 1-Specificity<br />
71.4 1.00 0.81<br />
133.1 0.91 0.34<br />
147.2 0.88 0.26<br />
155.7 0.84 0.22<br />
160.1 0.83 0.20<br />
164.2 0.81 0.18<br />
167.7 0.78 0.17<br />
309.2 0.00 0.01<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Traditionally the interpretation <strong>of</strong> ELISA is dichotomous (positive<br />
or negative) based on the cut-<strong>of</strong>f designed to optimize the<br />
sensitivity and specificity to detect animals with antibodies. The<br />
use <strong>of</strong> antibody titers on a continuous scale can improve the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> diagnostic information obtained by this technique. The<br />
ELISA evaluated in this study, as is the case <strong>of</strong> previous studies<br />
with different ELISAs 3 could allow a more accurate estimate <strong>of</strong><br />
the situation <strong>of</strong> the animal, in this case related to the<br />
bacteriological “status”.<br />
References<br />
1. Kennedy, DJ, Benedictus, G (2001). Control <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium avium<br />
subsp. paratuberculosis infection in agricultural species. Scientific and<br />
Technical Reviews, 20, 151-79.<br />
2. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2008). Manual <strong>of</strong> diagnostic<br />
test & vaccines for terrestrial animals, Chapter 2.1.11.<br />
3. Collins, MT (2002). Interpretation <strong>of</strong> a commercial bovine<br />
paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood<br />
ratios. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 9, 1367-71.
S1 - P - 16<br />
EVALUATION OF AN ELISA ASSAY AS AN ANCILLARY METHOD IN A HERD WITH A NATURAL<br />
TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION<br />
I. Arnaiz 1 , C. Eiras 1 , M.L. Luaces 2 , J. Fraga 3 , M. Rodríguez 3 , C. Calvo 1<br />
1 Laboratorio de Sanidade e Produción Animal de Galicia, Consellería do Medio Rural e do Mar, Xunta de Galicia, Lugo, España<br />
2<br />
Área Veterinaria de Lugo, Servicio Provincial de Ganadería de Lugo, Consellería do Medio Rural e do Mar, Xunta de Galicia, Lugo, España<br />
3<br />
Área Veterinaria de Vilalba, Servicio Provincial de Ganadería de Lugo, Consellería do Medio Rural e do Mar, Xunta de Galicia, Lugo, España<br />
Keyword: Tuberculosis, ELISA, IFN-g, SIT, isolation<br />
Introduction<br />
The single intradermal tuberculin (SIT) test and the Interferongamma<br />
assay (IFN-g) are the tuberculosis diagnostic tools in<br />
the tuberculosis eradication program currently used in Spain.<br />
These tests based on cell-mediated response can detect<br />
animals in the early stages <strong>of</strong> infection (1), although not all<br />
affected animals are detected with these tests. Humoral<br />
immune response is found in cattle with natural infection and<br />
this response could be detected by the use <strong>of</strong> an ELISA assay.<br />
ELISA testing is not routinely used in bovine tuberculosis<br />
control programs mainly due to a reduced sensitivity (2)<br />
although it has been suggested that it might be used as a<br />
complement to the tuberculin test, especially for the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> anergic tuberculous cattle (3).<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> SIT test<br />
and the IFN-g assay together with an ELISA assay in order to<br />
obtain the most complete detection <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis infected<br />
animals in a herd previously confirmed to have tuberculosis.<br />
Material & methods<br />
314 animals from a tuberculosis infected beef herd from<br />
Galicia, in north-west Spain, were tested using the SIT test.<br />
The IFN-g detection assay (BovigamTM, Prionics AG,<br />
Switzerland) was used in parallel with the SIT test. The 16<br />
positive SIT animals (<strong>of</strong> which 15 animals were also detected<br />
by IFN-g assay) and 17 cattle that were only detected by IFN-g<br />
assay were slaughtered and their tissues were collected for<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) isolation. At the<br />
same time, 20 cows older than 10 years were slaughtered too.<br />
Tissues from the 53 slaughtered animals were inoculated into<br />
the selective media (4). The MTC was recovered and<br />
confirmed by real-time PCR (5) in 18 cattle.<br />
The plasma collected for the IFN-g assay was also used on<br />
the ELISA assay for M. bovis antibody (IDEXX Laboratories).<br />
18 cattle were detected with the ELISA assay.<br />
The agreement and kappa statistic measurements were<br />
calculated by comparing the MTC isolation with SIT test, IFN-g<br />
and ELISA assays respectively.<br />
References<br />
1. Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG,<br />
Christiansen KH, Clifton-Hadley RS: Ante mortem diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
tuberculosis in cattle: a review <strong>of</strong> the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon<br />
assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci 2006,<br />
81:190-210.<br />
2.Ritacco V, Lopez B, Barrera L, Nader A, Fliess E, de Kantor: Further<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bovine tuberculosis. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1990, 37:19-<br />
27.<br />
3. Plackett P, Ripper J, Corner LA, Small K, de Witte K, Melville L,<br />
Hides S, Wood PR: An ELISA for the detection <strong>of</strong> anergic tuberculous<br />
cattle. Aus Vet J 1989, 66:15-19.<br />
4. Idigoras P., Beristain X., Iturzaeta A., Vicente D., Pérez-Trallero E.<br />
2000. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the automated nonradiometric BACTEC MGIT<br />
960 system with Löwestein-Jensen, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H11<br />
solid media for recovery <strong>of</strong> mycobacteria. European Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical<br />
Microbiology Infections Diseases 19: 350-354.<br />
5. Huard R.C., Oliveira-Lazzarini L.C., Butler W.R., van Soolingen D.,<br />
Ho J.L. 2003. PCR-Basaed method to differentiate the subspecies <strong>of</strong><br />
the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on the basis <strong>of</strong> genomic<br />
deletions. Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Microbiology, vol 41, n 4: 1637-1650.<br />
Results<br />
10 bovine with MTC recovered were SIT test positive. 16 were<br />
positive in the IFN-g assay and the ELISA detected 13 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
18 cattle with MTC recovered (one <strong>of</strong> them was negative in<br />
SIT test and IFN-g assay). One bovine with MTC recovered<br />
was negative in the three tests; this animal was slaughtered<br />
because it was more than10 years old.<br />
The kappa statistic shows a lower agreement for the SIT test<br />
(0.39) and the IFN-g assay (0.36) with the MTC isolation than<br />
the ELISA assay (0.58).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results suggest that the use <strong>of</strong> IFN-g and ELISA assays<br />
as ancillary techniques might help to detect a larger number <strong>of</strong><br />
tuberculosis infected animals in a TB-confirmed herd. These<br />
assays complement each other because they may detect<br />
animals in different stages <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thanks IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., for providing the ELISA<br />
test for detection <strong>of</strong> M. bovis antibodies. We also would like to<br />
thank the Official Veterinary Services from Vilalba for assisting<br />
with abattoir sampling, the Regional Animal Health Veterinary<br />
Services for their support and the Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Animal Health<br />
<strong>of</strong> Galicia.
S1 - P - 17<br />
VIROLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AVIAN-LIKE REASSORTANT H1N2<br />
SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUSES IN SWEDEN<br />
Giorgi Metreveli , Eva Emmoth, Lena Renström<br />
National Veterinary Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
Introduction<br />
The influenza A virus subtypes H1N1, H1N2 and H3N2 are<br />
prevalent in pig populations worldwide. In 2009 and 2010 there<br />
was the first reported isolations and demonstrations <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
reassortants <strong>of</strong> H1N2 viruses in pigs in Sweden (1,2).<br />
Characterized Swedish isolates possessed avian-like SIV H1N1<br />
HA and European H3N2 SIV-like NA. They were compared<br />
regarding their molecular composition and biological<br />
characteristics.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Virus was isolated from the clinical material by infecting Madin<br />
Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) (ATCC CCL-34) cells, following<br />
standard cell culture procedures. Viruses were analyzed by endpoint<br />
titration through cpe using 96-well plates containing MDCK<br />
cells, in 10-fold dilutions assaying eight replicates <strong>of</strong> 50 µl per<br />
dilution, and the virus titres after 6-8 days were calculated<br />
according to Kärber (3). NA enzyme activity and drug inhibition<br />
assays were performed with methylumbelliferone<br />
nacetylneuraminic acid (MUNANA) as the substrate. Genetic<br />
analyses were conducted on the clinical material and on the<br />
MDCK cell isolates. Total RNA was prepared from virus-infected<br />
MDCK cells by the QiagenRNeasy Mini kit, according to the<br />
manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden Germany).<br />
Sequencing templates were generated by amplification <strong>of</strong> each<br />
gene segment using one-step RT-PCR (QIAGEN OneStep RT-<br />
PCR Kit). The PCR products were purified using the ‘Purification<br />
Kit from Promega’ and sequenced using the fluorescent dye<br />
terminator method with an ABI PRISM® Big Dye Terminator<br />
Cycle Sequencing v3.1 Ready Reaction kit (Perkin Elmer,<br />
Waltham, MA, USA) on an ABI PRISM® 310 genetic analyzer<br />
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Applied<br />
Biosystems).Sequence data analyses, multiple alignments <strong>of</strong> the<br />
DNA sequences <strong>of</strong> each gene, were performed using CLC, Main<br />
Workbench 5.0.2 (CLC bio A/S, Aarhus, Denmark).<br />
Results<br />
The most remarkable result was a truncated coding region for<br />
PB1-F2 in the earlier isolates and a full length coding region in<br />
the more recent isolates. Concerning biological properties, these<br />
viruses reached lower titre and showed reduced<br />
cytopathogenicity in MDCK cells compared with an avian-like<br />
H1N1 isolate A/swine/Lidkoping/1193/2002 belonging to the<br />
same lineage as the 2009 and 2010 isolates.<br />
Figure 1: Always put legend below the figure<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Recent serological investigations in Swedish pig population has<br />
also shown that this uncommon avian-like reassortant H1N2 SIV<br />
variant appears to be gaining a stronger foothold among Swedish<br />
pig populations and producing more clinical disease. The<br />
molecular genomic differences found here indicate that the virus<br />
population is steadily evolving. In order to determine the effect on<br />
the swine industry and influenza ecology, further surveillance<br />
investigations and detailed analyses are needed.<br />
References<br />
1 Bálint, A., et al., The first Swedish H1N2 swine influenza virus isolate represents<br />
an uncommon reassortant. Virology Journal, 2009. 6 Oct 28(180).<br />
2. Metreveli, G., et al. Comparison <strong>of</strong> two H1N2 swine influenza A viruses from<br />
disease outbreaks in pigs in Sweden during 2009 and 2010.Virus Genes, 2011.<br />
Apr;42(2):236-44<br />
3. Kärber, G., Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer<br />
Reihenversuche. Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmacologie, 1931.<br />
162: p. 480-483.<br />
Influenza A, swine, genetic characterization
S1 - P - 18<br />
A TOOL TO ASSESS ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PATTERNS IN DAIRY FARMS<br />
Gerolimetto E. 1 , Cibin V. 1 , Marafin E. 1 , Zavagnin P. 1 , Longo A. 1 , Ramon E. 1 , Ruffa M. 1 , Menin R. 2 , Carraro A. 2 ,<br />
Pozza G. 1 , Lettini A.A. 1 ,Ricci A. 1<br />
1<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro (PD), Italy<br />
2 ASL 15 Alta Padovana, Cittadella (PD), ITALY<br />
Antimicrobial resistance, E. coli, Enterococcus spp., dairy farms<br />
Introduction<br />
Resistance to antimicrobials is <strong>of</strong> major public health concern.<br />
The inappropriate use <strong>of</strong> antimicrobials may contribute to the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> antibiotic resistant commensal bacteria, with the<br />
subsequent risk <strong>of</strong> widespread dissemination <strong>of</strong> antibiotic<br />
resistance determinants (1). To our knowledge few studies<br />
describing antimicrobials resistance patterns <strong>of</strong> indicator bacteria<br />
in dairy farms have been published (2). Aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to<br />
evaluate a tool to identify antimicrobial resistance patterns <strong>of</strong><br />
commensal bacteria at dairy herd-level highlighting differences<br />
among animal categories.<br />
Material & methods<br />
30 dairy farms in the north-eastern part <strong>of</strong> Italy were sampled<br />
between September 2010 and January 2011. Individual faecal<br />
samples were collected from 4 groups <strong>of</strong> animals taking into<br />
account the intra-herd animal population distribution: 15, 5, 5 and<br />
up to 5 samples from lactating cows (LA), dry cows (DC), heifers<br />
S1 - P - 19<br />
CHARACTERIZATION OF EXTENDED-SPECTRUM ß-LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING<br />
ESCHERICHIA COLI BOVINE ISOLATES IN NORTHWEST SPAIN.<br />
V. Gómez 1,2 , A. Mora 2 , A. Méndez 1 , R. Mamani 2 , C. López 2 , A. Lamas 1 , C. Eiras 1 , J. Blanco 2<br />
1 Laboratorio de Sanidade e Produción Animal de Galicia, Consellería do Medio Rural e do Mar, Xunta de Galicia, Lugo, España<br />
2<br />
Departamento de Microbioloxía e Parasitoloxía. Laboratorio de Referencia de Escherichia coli. Facultade de Veterinaria. USC, Lugo, España<br />
Keyword: Escherichia coli, ESBLs, bovine, CTX-M<br />
Introduction<br />
Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) confer bacterial<br />
resistance to all beta-lactams except carbapenems and<br />
cephamycins. In 1989, a new family <strong>of</strong> ESBLs called CTX-M<br />
was characterized with a potent hydrolytic activity against<br />
cephalosporins such as cefuroxime, cefotaxime and cefepime.<br />
At least 65 ß-lactamases CTX-M are currently known and<br />
spread all over the world (1).<br />
The emergence and wide dissemination <strong>of</strong> ESBLs among<br />
clinical Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates in hospitals,<br />
community patients, food-producing animals and household<br />
pets in recent years are <strong>of</strong> great concern and represent a<br />
problem for the treatment <strong>of</strong> infectious diseases (2).<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was the genotypic and phenotypic<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> E. coli strains isolated from bovine.<br />
3. Locatelli C, Caronte I, Scaccabarozzi L, Migliavacca R, Pagani L,<br />
Moroni P. 2009. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in E. coli<br />
strains isolated from clinical bovine mastitis. Vet. Res. Commun. 33:<br />
141-144.<br />
4. López-Cerero L, Egea P, Serrano L, Navarro D, Mora A, Blanco J,<br />
Doi Y, Paterson DL, Rodríguez-Baño J, Pascual A. Characterisation <strong>of</strong><br />
clinical and food animal Escherichia coli isolates producing CTX-M-15<br />
extended-spectrum β-lactamase belonging to ST410 phylogroup A. Int J<br />
Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Apr;37(4):365-7. Epub 2011 Feb 16. PubMed<br />
PMID: 21330111.<br />
5. Cortés P, Blanc V, Mora A, Dahbi G, Blanco JE, Blanco M, López C,<br />
Andreu A, Navarro F, Alonso MP, Bou G, Blanco J, Llagostera M.<br />
Isolation and characterization <strong>of</strong> potentially pathogenic antimicrobialresistant<br />
Escherichia coli strains from chicken and pig farms in Spain.<br />
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 May;76(9):2799-805. Epub 2010 Mar 12.<br />
PubMed PMID: 20228098; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2863447.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
From 2003 to 2009, 38 strains <strong>of</strong> ESBL-producing E. coli were<br />
isolated from clinical cases <strong>of</strong> bovine mastitis and diarrhoea<br />
from dairy farms in Galicia, northwest Spain.<br />
The phenotypic characterization was determined by BD<br />
PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System and double-disk<br />
synergy test.<br />
Genotypic ESBL confirmation, virulence gene, phylogenetic<br />
groups, and amplification <strong>of</strong> fragment blaCTX-M were carried<br />
out by PCR. Finally, the strains were serotyped, and molecular<br />
characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and<br />
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).<br />
Results<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the 38 isolates showed that 74% (28 strains) and<br />
26% (10 strains) produced CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-32<br />
enzymes, respectively. A statistical significant association was<br />
found between CTX-M-14 and resistance to gentamicin, and<br />
CTX-M-32 and resistance to aztreonam and ceftazidime. Of<br />
the 38 E. coli isolates, 30 (79%) carried at least two virulence<br />
gene typical <strong>of</strong> extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strains<br />
(ExPEC).<br />
The determination <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic groups showed that the E.<br />
coli isolates belonged to A (50%), B1 (31.5%) and D (18.4%)<br />
phylogroups. None <strong>of</strong> the bovine isolates belonged to the<br />
phylogenetic group B2 associated with human virulence in<br />
ExPEC.<br />
In accordance with the high diversity identified by serotyping,<br />
PFGE molecular analysis revealed highly heterogeneous<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Only one successful clonal group, the O20:H8/HNT-<br />
B1-ST448 CTX-M-14-producing, was detected.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our survey demonstrates that Galician bovine is a reservoir <strong>of</strong><br />
CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-32-producing E. coli strains, with<br />
important associated resistances to aminoglycoside,<br />
tetracycline, sulphonamide, fluoroquinolone and<br />
chloramphenicol.<br />
Although person-to person spread is recognised as the main<br />
vehicle <strong>of</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> ESBL-producing E. coli in hospital and<br />
the community, the primary reservoirs <strong>of</strong> such organisms are<br />
still in discussion. ESBL-producing E. coli have been isolated<br />
from food animals in many countries, particularly poultry and<br />
cattle (3, 4, 5), so farm animals are now recognised as<br />
important carriers <strong>of</strong> BLEEs. Further studies are required to<br />
determine the true zoonotic potential <strong>of</strong> these ESBL-producing<br />
strains.<br />
References<br />
1. Cantón R, Coque TM. 2006. The CTX-M beta-lactamase pandemic.<br />
Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9:466-475.<br />
2. Carattoli A. 2008. Animal reservoirs for extended-spectrum ß-<br />
lactamase producers. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:117-123.
S1 - P - 20<br />
OVINE ABORTION CAUSED BY YERSINIA PSEUDOTUBERCULOSIS – A CASE REPORT<br />
Varpu Hirvelä-Koski, Minna Nylund<br />
Finnish Food Safety Authority, Research Department, Oulu, Finland<br />
Ovine abortion, pseudotuberculosis<br />
Introduction<br />
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is a gram-negative organism that<br />
causes various syndromes including mesenteric lymphadenitis<br />
and septicaemia in wild and domestic animals as well as in<br />
humans. Wild birds and rodents are considered to be<br />
reservoirs <strong>of</strong> the bacterium. Sporadic abortions due to<br />
placentitis have been reported in sheep, goats and cows (1,2).<br />
We describe here a case <strong>of</strong> ovine abortion caused by Yersinia<br />
pseudotuberculosis.<br />
Material & methods<br />
The samples were obtained from an organic farm keeping<br />
about 300 ewes in central Finland. The ewes were traditional<br />
Finnish homebred sheep. Two <strong>of</strong> the ewes aborted before the<br />
lambing season with an interval <strong>of</strong> two weeks, approximately<br />
one month before the estimated lambing. Samples from the<br />
second abortion were sent to the laboratory, unfortunately<br />
frozen.<br />
Two fetuses and the afterbirth were obtained to the laboratory.<br />
The samples were examined using gross pathology and<br />
histopathology (HE stain). Lung, liver and contents <strong>of</strong><br />
abomasum as well as the afterbirth were cultivated on the<br />
following media: trypticase soy agar incorporated with 5 %<br />
bovine blood (aerobic incubation), fastidious anaerobe agar<br />
(FAA) (microaerophilic), FAA (anaerobic), selective FAA for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter fetus (microaerophilic), Sabouraud<br />
agar (aerobic), salmonella enrichment media (pre-enrichment<br />
broth, modified semi-solid Rappaport Vassiliadis medium).<br />
STAMP stain was used for the detection <strong>of</strong> brucellosis using<br />
material from lung, liver and afterbirth. All plates were<br />
incubated at 37⁰+ 1⁰C. The identification <strong>of</strong> Yersinia<br />
pseudotuberculosis was based on colony morphology, gramstain,<br />
oxidase reaction, production <strong>of</strong> acid from glucose, typical<br />
growth on MacConkey agar and API 20 E pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
Wild rodents are considered to be one reservoir <strong>of</strong> Yersinia<br />
pseudotuberculosis. The population densities <strong>of</strong> wild voles has<br />
been high in Finland in recent years. It is possible that this<br />
phenomenon has increased the infection pressure caused by<br />
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.<br />
References<br />
1. Karbe, E, Erickson, ED (1984). Ovine abortion and stillbirth due to<br />
purulent placentitis caused by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Vet. Pathol.<br />
21, 601-606<br />
2. Juste, RA, Minguijón, E, Arranz, J, Fuertes, M, Beltrán de Heredia, I<br />
(2009). Lamb mortality in an outbreak <strong>of</strong> Yersinia pseudotuberculosis<br />
mastitis, as a collateral effect <strong>of</strong> colostrum feeding for Lentivirus-control.<br />
Small Ruminant Res. 86, 46-53.<br />
3. Hallanvuo, S (2009). Foodborne Yersinia. Identification and<br />
molecular epidemiology <strong>of</strong> isolates from human infections. Acad. Diss.,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Finland. National Institute for Health and Welfare,<br />
Research series no 11, Helsinki University Print.<br />
Results<br />
The fetuses, a male and a female weighed 347,5 and 600,8 g,<br />
the fetal length being 21 and 26 cm, respectively. In gross<br />
pathology no specific lesions could be found. Both fetuses and<br />
the afterbirth had quite intense autolytic changes.<br />
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis was isolated as a pure growth<br />
from the afterbirth. Growth was observed on all non-selective<br />
media at all atmospheres. The bacterium was detected also<br />
from the inner organs <strong>of</strong> both fetuses. The growth was most<br />
abundant in cultivations from abomasum. Other pathogenic<br />
organisms were not detected.<br />
The bacterium was a gram-negative small rod, oxidase<br />
negative, acid but not gas was produced from glucose. There<br />
were small brown colonies on MacConkey. API 20 E pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
suggested identification to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.<br />
Histopathological examination revealed suppurative placentitis<br />
and non-suppurative conjunctivitis. In the villi <strong>of</strong> the cotyledons<br />
there were multiple necrotic foci with neutrophilic and<br />
mononuclear infiltrates. There were masses <strong>of</strong> coccobacilli and<br />
infiltrations <strong>of</strong> mononuclear and plasma cells with a few<br />
granulocytes in the lamina propria <strong>of</strong> the conjunctiva <strong>of</strong> both<br />
fetuses. In other internal organs the autolytic changes were<br />
quite intense and any specific lesions could not be found.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is <strong>of</strong>ten observed as the cause <strong>of</strong><br />
septicemia in wild animals in Finland, e,g, hare. The bacterium<br />
has also caused several large outbreaks <strong>of</strong> food-borne<br />
illnesses in humans in Finland in the last decade. Yersinia<br />
pseudotuberculosis has been reported as a rare causative<br />
agent <strong>of</strong> sporadic abortion <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat. However, as far<br />
as we know, this is the first time that it was isolated from ovine<br />
abortion samples in Finland.
S1- P - 21<br />
ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE MCMASTER METHOD IN RAYNAUD’S MODIFICATION IN<br />
DETECTION OF TOXOCARA SP. AND TRICHURIS SP. EGGS IN CARNIVORES FAECES<br />
Maciej Kochanowski, Joanna Dąbrowska, Jacek Karamon, Tomasz Cencek<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Departament <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Disease, Pulawy, Poland<br />
McMaster method, efficiency, carnivores, Toxocara, Trichuris<br />
Introduction<br />
Carnivores animals are the hosts <strong>of</strong> the important zoonotic<br />
intestinal parasites. Faeces <strong>of</strong> these animals, containing eggs <strong>of</strong><br />
dangerous parasites are a potential source <strong>of</strong> infection for<br />
humans. The particular importance in the spread <strong>of</strong> dangerous<br />
invasive parasitic forms may have a common use <strong>of</strong> this faeces<br />
as natural organic fertilizers. The aim <strong>of</strong> study was to determine<br />
the efficiency <strong>of</strong> McMaster method in Raynaud’s modification<br />
(Raynaund, 1970) in the detection <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs <strong>of</strong> the genera<br />
Toxocara and Trichuris present in the faeces <strong>of</strong> carnivores, using<br />
faeces samples enriched with known numbers <strong>of</strong> eggs.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Four variants <strong>of</strong> this McMaster method (counting in one grid, two<br />
grids, the whole McMaster chamber and flotation slide) were<br />
used to examine dog faeces samples enriched with Toxocara sp.,<br />
Trichuris sp. and Ascaris suum eggs. A. suum eggs were the<br />
control <strong>of</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> the parasite eggs properties on the results.<br />
One hundred and sixty enriched samples were prepared from<br />
dog faeces (20 repetitions for each eggs level) containing 15, 25,<br />
50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 eggs <strong>of</strong> the three types <strong>of</strong> eggs in<br />
1 g <strong>of</strong> faeces. Moreover, to compare the influence <strong>of</strong> kind <strong>of</strong><br />
faeces on the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the method 160 pig faecal samples<br />
were prepared and enriched with A. suum eggs.in the same way<br />
Results<br />
The highest (worst) limit <strong>of</strong> detection (Table 1) in all McMaster<br />
variants were obtained with eggs <strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp. (from 25 to 250<br />
eggs / g faeces, depending on the variant) - about twice higher<br />
than for Trichuris sp. and A. suum eggs (from 15 to 100 eggs / g<br />
feces). The highest (worst) limit <strong>of</strong> detection for flotation in the<br />
tube were obtained for Trichuris sp. eggs (100 eggs / g) - it was<br />
4-times higher than the results for other types <strong>of</strong> eggs (25 eggs /<br />
g). The best results <strong>of</strong> the limit <strong>of</strong> detection, sensitivity, the lowest<br />
coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation (providing about repeatability) were<br />
obtained with the use <strong>of</strong> whole McMaster chamber variant. There<br />
was no significant impact <strong>of</strong> faeces properties (dog and pig<br />
faeces) on the obtained results. Multiplication factors (to estimate<br />
the real number <strong>of</strong> eggs in 1 g <strong>of</strong> faeces) were calculated on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the transformed equation <strong>of</strong> the trend line illustrating the<br />
relationship between number <strong>of</strong> eggs found by the examination<br />
and the number <strong>of</strong> eggs added to the sample. Multiplication<br />
factors for eggs <strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp. and Trichuris sp. were higher<br />
than planned by Raynaud, and for A. suum were comparable with<br />
them. The multiplication factor estimated for flotation in the tube<br />
(flotation slide variant) for all types <strong>of</strong> examined parasite eggs<br />
were significantly higher than that given by Raynaud (Table 2).<br />
Table 1: Limit <strong>of</strong> detection for all variants <strong>of</strong> the McMaster method<br />
in Raynaund’s modification<br />
Variants<br />
Dog faeces<br />
Pig faeces<br />
<strong>of</strong> the method Toxocara Trichuris Ascaris Ascaris<br />
one grid 250 100 100 50<br />
two grids 100 50 25 25<br />
whole chamber 25 15 15 15<br />
flotation slide 25 100 25 25<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the publications about detection <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs are<br />
based on material from natural or experimental infection. For that<br />
reason the real number <strong>of</strong> eggs in faeces can not be properly<br />
assessed (Vadlejch et al, 2011; Mes et al, 2007). Therefore, in<br />
order to obtain the most reliable results in our experiment the<br />
material enriched with a known number <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs was<br />
used. The results <strong>of</strong> experiments indicate that detection <strong>of</strong><br />
parasite eggs <strong>of</strong> carnivores by McMaster method in Raynaud’s<br />
modification differs from the basic parameters <strong>of</strong> this<br />
modification. There were significant differences in the efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> the method according to the type <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs. In the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp. eggs examined in the McMaster chamber there<br />
were observed significantly lower numbers <strong>of</strong> detected eggs in 1<br />
g <strong>of</strong> faeces than obtained for Trichuris sp. and A. suum eggs.<br />
Most likely reason <strong>of</strong> the lowest detection Toxocara sp. eggs in<br />
the McMaster chamber is the specific shell structure <strong>of</strong> these<br />
eggs – namely, they have strong adhesive properties<br />
(Overgaauw, Knapen, 2008). It can result in higher losses <strong>of</strong><br />
parasite eggs during performing <strong>of</strong> the method. The variant in the<br />
tube (flotaion slide) was characterized by the lowest number <strong>of</strong><br />
detected eggs in the case <strong>of</strong> Trichuris sp. It is probably related to<br />
the high specific gravity <strong>of</strong> the Trichuris sp. eggs affects to less<br />
effective flotation process in tube. According to our study the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp. eggs in McMaster chamber is twice<br />
lower than planned by Raynaud. In the case <strong>of</strong> Trichuris sp. eggs<br />
it is slightly lower. However, A. suum eggs in pig and dog feces,<br />
were detected in number close to the assumptions <strong>of</strong> McMaster<br />
method in Raynaud’s modification. Detection <strong>of</strong> all three types<br />
parasite eggs as a result <strong>of</strong> the tube flotation (flotation slide<br />
variant) is several times lower than the assumptions <strong>of</strong> Raynaud's<br />
modification (which is at the level <strong>of</strong> detection obtained in the<br />
variant <strong>of</strong> two grids <strong>of</strong> McMaster chamber). Our results allowed<br />
us to assess the real efficiency <strong>of</strong> the McMaster method in<br />
Raynaud’s modification in carnivore feces samples enriched with<br />
a known number <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs. The investigation carried out<br />
with selected (important to the diagnostic and the zoonotic point<br />
<strong>of</strong> view) two types <strong>of</strong> nematodes (Toxocara sp. and Trichuris sp.)<br />
showed a significant effect <strong>of</strong> parasite genus on the detection<br />
efficiency. However, it is desirable to extend calibration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
method for other kinds <strong>of</strong> parasites whose eggs differ significantly<br />
in the morphology - in particular with regard to the eggs <strong>of</strong><br />
tapeworms.<br />
References<br />
1. Mes T., Eysker M., Ploeger H., 2007. A simple, robust and semiautomated<br />
parasite egg isolation protocol. Nature Protocols.<br />
2. Overgaauw P., Knapen F., 2008. Toxocarosis, an important zoonosis.<br />
European Journal <strong>of</strong> Companion Animal Practice Vol. 18 Issue 3 (2008).<br />
3. Raynaud J., 1970. Etude de l’efficacite d’une technique de coproscopie<br />
quantitative pour le diagnostic de routine et le controle des infestations<br />
parasitaires des bovins, ovins, equines et porcins. Annales de<br />
Parasitologie (Paris). 45 pp. 321-342<br />
4. Vadlejch J., Petrtyl M., Zaichenko I., Cadkova Z., Jankovska I.,<br />
Langrova I., Moravec M., 2011. Which McMaster egg counting technique is<br />
the most reliable? Parasitology Research 109(5): 1387-1394 (2011)<br />
Table 2: Multiplication factors for estimation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />
eggs in 1g <strong>of</strong> faeces, for all variants <strong>of</strong> the McMaster method in<br />
Raynaund’s modification<br />
Variants<br />
Dog faeces<br />
Pig faeces<br />
<strong>of</strong> the method Toxocara Trichuris Ascaris Ascaris<br />
one grid 244 145 108 111<br />
two grids 120 78 54 63<br />
whole chamber 40 26 22 22<br />
flotation slide 49 62 35 43
S1 - P - 22<br />
MILK AMYLOID A AND ITS USEFULNESS IN THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF MASTITIS<br />
Gabriel Kováč 1 , Csilla Tóthová 1 , Oskar Nagy 1 , Martin Kováč 2<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Clinic for Ruminants, Košice, Slovak Republic<br />
2 Regional Veterinary and Food Administration, Košice, Slovak Republic<br />
Dairy cows, mastitis, milk amyloid A, haptoglobin, serum amyloid A<br />
Introduction<br />
Mastitis is recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the most important diseases<br />
affecting dairy cattle. Raised levels <strong>of</strong> major acute phase proteins<br />
in cattle, haptoglobin and serum amyloid A, have previously been<br />
shown in milk from cows with clinical mastitis as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
leakage <strong>of</strong> these proteins from the blood to the milk (Eckersall et<br />
al., 2001). Further investigations showed an extrahepatic<br />
synthesis <strong>of</strong> specific is<strong>of</strong>orm <strong>of</strong> amyloid A directly in mammary<br />
epithelial cells, the so called milk amyloid A (MAA) (McDonald et<br />
al., 2001).<br />
Therefore, this work was aimed at the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the influence<br />
<strong>of</strong> clinical and sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cows on the<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> MAA in milk samples, and selected acute<br />
phase proteins in blood serum.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Into the evaluation we included 41 dairy cows <strong>of</strong> a low-land black<br />
spotted breed and its crossbreeds with various clinical findings on<br />
the mammary gland. These cows were in the 3rd – 4th lactation,<br />
but not in the period shortly after parturition. Clinical examination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the mammary gland was performed by visual inspection and<br />
palpation. Clinical mastitis was diagnosed by the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
observable signs <strong>of</strong> inflammation in the infected quarter such as<br />
swelling, heat, pain or redness, and by the presence <strong>of</strong> clots and<br />
flakes in the milk, or by its abnormal color or consistency. To<br />
detect sub-clinical mastitis the Californian Mastitis Test (CMT)<br />
was performed. According to the results <strong>of</strong> the clinical<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> the udder and to the results <strong>of</strong> CMT the animals<br />
were divided into 4 groups: Group I – cows without clinical<br />
changes on the mammary gland and with negative CMT (n = 7),<br />
Group II – cows without clinical changes on the mammary gland<br />
and with weakly positive CMT (n = 12), Group III – cows without<br />
clinical changes on the mammary gland and with strongly positive<br />
CMT (n = 13), Group IV – cows with clinical changes on the<br />
mammary gland and changes in milk appearance (n = 9).<br />
Milk samples were collected into plastic tubes by hand-stripping.<br />
Blood samples were collected by direct puncture <strong>of</strong> v. jugularis.<br />
Milk samples were used to assess the concentrations <strong>of</strong> milk<br />
amyloid A (M-SAA, ng/ml), and haptoglobin (Hp, mg/ml) and<br />
serum amyloid A (SAA, μg/ml) were assessed in blood samples.<br />
Haptoglobin was assessed using commercial colorimetric kits<br />
(Tridelta Development, Ireland) in microplates. SAA and M-SAA<br />
were analysed by commercial ELISA kits (Tridelta Development,<br />
Ireland). The optical densities were read on automatic microplate<br />
reader Opsys MR (Dynex Technologies, USA) at an optical<br />
density <strong>of</strong> 630 nm for Hp, and 450 nm using 630 as reference for<br />
SAA and M-SAA.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the significance <strong>of</strong> differences in measured<br />
values between cows with various clinical findings on the<br />
mammary gland was performed by Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric<br />
ANOVA test and Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test.<br />
Results<br />
M-SAA concentrations in milk samples differed significantly<br />
between the groups (P < 0.001), with concentrations in samples<br />
from cows with clinical mastitis (group IV) being significantly<br />
higher than in samples from groups I and II (P < 0.001 and P <<br />
0.05, respectively, Table 1). The concentrations <strong>of</strong> M-SAA in milk<br />
samples increased with increasing CMT score.<br />
The serum concentrations <strong>of</strong> Hp showed also tendency <strong>of</strong><br />
gradual significant increase with increasing CMT score and<br />
clinical changes on the mammary gland (P < 0.05, Table 1). The<br />
highest mean Hp concentration we found in cows with clinically<br />
manifested signs <strong>of</strong> mastitis. Similarly, SAA concentrations<br />
differed significantly between the evaluated groups <strong>of</strong> cows (P <<br />
0.05), with the highest mean concentration in animals with clinical<br />
signs <strong>of</strong> mastitis. However, the differences in the obtained results<br />
<strong>of</strong> Hp and SAA concentrations between the evaluated groups <strong>of</strong><br />
cows were less significant (P < 0.05) compared with MAA<br />
concentrations. The mean SAA concentrations found in cows<br />
from group I and group II were roughly uniform.<br />
Table 1: Concentrations <strong>of</strong> evaluated variables in dairy cows<br />
Variable I II III IV P <<br />
M- x 325.7 A,B 1433.1 a 3910.4 A 6073.8 B,a<br />
SAA ±sd 173.8 949.2 2145.8 4414.0<br />
0.001<br />
Hp<br />
x 0.046 0.122 0.299 0.329<br />
±sd 0.053 0.263 0.314 0.339<br />
0.05<br />
SAA<br />
x 29.7 27.6 a 48.2 71.5 a<br />
±sd 27.6 28.0 42.5 31.5<br />
0.05<br />
The same indexes in lines mean significance <strong>of</strong> differences in values<br />
between the groups: a – P < 0.05; A, B – P < 0.01<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> our study indicate that inflammatory diseases <strong>of</strong><br />
the mammary gland lead to an increase in the concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
M-SAA. Compared to Hp and SAA, M-SAA is synthesized directly<br />
in the mammary epithelia <strong>of</strong> the udder in response to infection<br />
(Jacobsen et al. 2005). Therefore, M-SAA is believed to be a<br />
more sensitive indicator <strong>of</strong> mastitis; it accumulates in milk only<br />
during mammary inflammation. Petersen et al. (2005) reported<br />
that M-SAA concentrations, similarly to our results, were higher in<br />
quarters with mastitis compared to healthy quarters.<br />
Moreover, mastitis may activate systemic inflammatory reactions,<br />
including the induction <strong>of</strong> the synthesis <strong>of</strong> acute phase proteins<br />
by the liver. The results <strong>of</strong> our study showed that the<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> Hp and SAA were higher in serum from cows<br />
with clinical mastitis, and increased with increasing CMT score.<br />
These results are in line with previous studies (Eckersall et al.<br />
2001). It appears that localized severe inflammation <strong>of</strong> the udder<br />
is sufficiently intense to induce a measurable systemic acute<br />
phase response. The concentrations <strong>of</strong> measured acute phase<br />
proteins had a tendency to be higher in the serum from the cows<br />
with local signs <strong>of</strong> mastitis and also in cows without clinical<br />
changes on the mammary gland, but with positive CMT.<br />
However, the finding that the differences in Hp and SAA<br />
concentrations observed between the groups <strong>of</strong> cows were less<br />
significant than the differences in M-SAA concentrations means<br />
that the measuring <strong>of</strong> serum concentrations <strong>of</strong> some acute phase<br />
proteins would be less useful to the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the severity <strong>of</strong><br />
mastitis than the measuring <strong>of</strong> the concentrations <strong>of</strong> M-SAA<br />
directly in milk samples.<br />
Generated data suggest the usefulness <strong>of</strong> M-SAA for diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> bovine sub-clinical mastitis, as well as in the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
the severity <strong>of</strong> mastitis, suggesting that its assessment as a part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the laboratory diagnosis would be a valuable supplementation<br />
to the proper clinical diagnosis and determination <strong>of</strong> other blood<br />
laboratory parameters.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This work was supported by VEGA Scientific Grant No 1/0592/12<br />
from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, and by Slovak Research and<br />
Development Agency under contract No. APVV-0475-10.<br />
References<br />
1. Eckersall, PD, Young, FJ, McComb, C, Hogarth, CJ, Safi, S, Weber, A,<br />
McDonald, T, Nolan, AM, Fitzpatrick, JL (2011). Acute phase proteins in<br />
serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Vet Rec, 148, 35-41<br />
2. Jacobsen, S, Niewold, TA, Kornalijnslijper, E, Toussaint, MJM, Gruys, E<br />
(2005). Kinetics <strong>of</strong> local and systemic is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>of</strong> serum amyloid A in<br />
bovine mastitic milk. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 104, 21-31<br />
3. McDonald, TL, Larson, MA, Mack, DR, Weber, A (2001). Elevated<br />
extrahepatic expression and secretion <strong>of</strong> mammary-associated serum<br />
amyloid A3 (M-SAA3) into colostrums. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 83,<br />
203-211<br />
4. Petersen, HH, Gardner, IA, Rossitto, P, Larsen, HD, Heegaard, PMH<br />
(2005). Accuracy <strong>of</strong> milk amyloid A (MAA) concentration and somatic cell<br />
count for diagnosing bovine mastitis. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 5 th International<br />
Colloquim on Animal Acute Phase Protein, Dublin, Ireland, March 14-15,<br />
2005, 43-44
S1 - P - 23<br />
RELIABLE AND EARLY DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN PIGS<br />
Tilman Kühn 1 , Patrik Buholzer 2<br />
1<br />
Synlab.vet Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany<br />
2<br />
Prionics AG, Schlieren, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
Salmonellosis is one <strong>of</strong> the most important zoonotic diseases and<br />
can cause serious clinical symptoms in humans. Pigs have been<br />
recognized as an important source <strong>of</strong> Salmonella infections. The<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> this disease presents great risks for human health.<br />
Salmonella infections <strong>of</strong> animals intended for the food industry<br />
play an important role in public health as these animals are<br />
considered to be the major source <strong>of</strong> human Salmonella<br />
infections. The PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 was<br />
developed for large-scale screening <strong>of</strong> pigs and for application in<br />
Salmonella control programs. Here we show that the test clearly<br />
discriminates positive and negative samples through its large<br />
dynamic range. As the test also allows earlier detection <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Salmonella infection in pigs, than competitor tests, it is the<br />
diagnostic tool <strong>of</strong> choice for Salmonella control programs.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Two separate experiments were performed. In the first<br />
experiment serum samples <strong>of</strong> ten pigs (4 negative and 6<br />
Salmonella positive samples) were tested with both the<br />
PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 and a competitor test.<br />
Additionally, the Salmonella status was determined in ten meat<br />
juice samples with both tests.<br />
In the second experiment, 40 pigs were experimentally inoculated<br />
with live Salmonella vaccine. Serum samples were taken at the<br />
day <strong>of</strong> inoculation, 3, 6 and 9 weeks post inoculation and were<br />
tested with the PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 and two<br />
competitor tests both validated for use in Germany. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
the three tests were compared.<br />
Results<br />
In the first experiment, both tests identified all positive and<br />
negative samples correctly, but the positive samples gave a<br />
much higher values with the PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine<br />
2.0 and therefore results were more clear-cut than those obtained<br />
with the competitor test. The average percentage positivity (PP)<br />
<strong>of</strong> positive samples <strong>of</strong> the PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0<br />
exceeded that <strong>of</strong> the competitor test by over 70 %. However, the<br />
PP values <strong>of</strong> negative samples were equal to, or lower than those<br />
<strong>of</strong> the competitor test. This means that the test does not generally<br />
generate high values, but is specific for positive samples.<br />
The PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 also earlier identifies<br />
animals experimentally infected with Salmonella. In serum<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> experimentally infected pigs, the PrioCHECK<br />
Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 identified 25 samples as positive at 3<br />
weeks post inoculation. 17 out <strong>of</strong> these 25 samples were missed<br />
by at least one competitor test (13 samples) at three weeks post<br />
inoculation, or only detected by the other tests at a later time post<br />
inoculation (4 samples).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The data show that the results obtained with PrioCHECK<br />
Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0 showed a large dynamic range and<br />
therefore allow reliable discrimination between positive and<br />
negative samples. This dynamic range means that the cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong><br />
40% PP -- implemented in most countries -- could easily be<br />
lowered to 20% without loss <strong>of</strong> specificity.<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> the PrioCHECK Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0<br />
reliably helps control Salmonella infections even early after<br />
infection.<br />
References<br />
1. B. Nielsen, D. Baggesen, F. Bager, J. Haugegaard, P. Lind Veterinary<br />
Microbiology 47 (1995) 205-218<br />
2. H.M.F. van der Heijden. First International Ring Trial <strong>of</strong> ELISA’s for<br />
Salmonella- antibody. Berl. Münch. Tierärztl Wschr. (2001) 389-392.<br />
3. PrioCHECK® Salmonella Ab porcine 2.0, Prionics AG<br />
http://www.prionics.com/diseases-solutions/salmonellosis/<br />
Food safety, diagnostic test, Salmonellosis
S1 - P - 24<br />
DETECTION OF BVD VIRUS ON PERSISTENTLY INFECTED CALVES BY REAL TIME REVERSE<br />
TRANSCRIPTION PCR ON EAR NOTCHES<br />
Damien MAGNEE 1 , Julie CHARROT 1 , Stéphane DALY 1 , Sandrine MOINE 1 , Eric SELLAL 1<br />
1<br />
LSI Laboratoire Service International, LISSIEU, France<br />
PCR, BVDV, Ear Notches, PI Calves, Magnetic Beads<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus is a pestivirus <strong>of</strong> the Flaviviridae<br />
family. The virus is transmitted by direct contact between<br />
animals. Vertical transmission plays an important role in the<br />
epidemiology and infection pathogenesis. In cattle, fetus infection<br />
can cause abortions, stillbirths, teratogenic effect or persistent<br />
infection <strong>of</strong> newborn calf (PI). It is therefore in the interest <strong>of</strong><br />
farmer to detect PI animals earliest after birth and then prevent<br />
virus spreading in the herd. The BVD diagnosis is performed on<br />
blood and serum, but there is a doubt about the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
virus detection in the presence <strong>of</strong> calf colostral antibodies, in the<br />
first day <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
In 2011, the French National Federation “Groupe de Défense<br />
Sanitaire” decided to study the feasibility <strong>of</strong> detecting the<br />
Persistently Infected (PI) calves by direct diagnosis on ear<br />
notches samples picked up while animals are tagged. In the<br />
frame <strong>of</strong> BVDV eradication, this system could become universally<br />
used if its sensitivity is equivalent to the detection on blood by RT<br />
rtPCR<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A study was conducted in Eastern France on 19 calves (3 days to<br />
4 weeks old) with confirmed PI status. Bloods and ear notches<br />
were collected for each animal.<br />
For each sample, nucleic acids were extracted with silica<br />
columns methods and with a magnetic beads method developed<br />
by LSI. Real-Time PCR was performed using the TaqVet<br />
BVDV Screening kit.<br />
The results obtained for bloods and ear notches were compared<br />
for each sample, to validate the using <strong>of</strong> skin samples for the<br />
BVDV diagnosis.<br />
The second part <strong>of</strong> the study consists to validate the using <strong>of</strong> pool<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10 samples <strong>of</strong> ear notches. Each positive eluate <strong>of</strong> skin sample<br />
for PI animals was pooled with 9 negative BVDV eluates, to<br />
obtain a pool <strong>of</strong> 10 samples. After RNA purification by column or<br />
magnetic beads, Real-Time PCR was performed with LSI kit.<br />
The last part consists <strong>of</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> the storage conditions <strong>of</strong> ear<br />
notches, from the sampling to the analysis. The samples were<br />
stored 7 days at 3 different conditions: -20°C, +4°C and room<br />
temperature. The RNA purification was performed with silica<br />
columns methods.<br />
Results<br />
For the comparison between blood and ear notches, the results<br />
showed a correlation <strong>of</strong> 100% (Figure 1). The mean difference<br />
between the both matrixes is about 0.7 Ct. Ear notch matrix<br />
shows an equivalent sensitivity than blood for PI calves detection.<br />
30<br />
25<br />
Blood<br />
Ear Notch<br />
Concerning the use <strong>of</strong> pool <strong>of</strong> 10 samples, the results show a<br />
good correlation between individual and pool <strong>of</strong> 10 results, with a<br />
Ct value difference <strong>of</strong> 3.2 (figure 2). This difference corresponds<br />
to the ear notches dilution factor <strong>of</strong> 10 (log [10] = 3.3Ct). Ear<br />
notch is then a reliable sample for PI detection in individual or in<br />
pool <strong>of</strong> 10 samples analysis.<br />
Figure 2: Ear Notch Analysis in pool <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
Concerning the last part <strong>of</strong> the study, for the storage conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
ear notches, no significative difference was observed on the PCR<br />
sensitivity at -20°C or at +4°C (∆Ct <strong>of</strong> 0.6, between D0 and D7).<br />
The storage at room T°C shows a significative variability on Ct<br />
values. So the room temperature is not adapted for the storage <strong>of</strong><br />
skin samples (∆Ct <strong>of</strong> 2.7, between D0 and D7). (Figure 3)<br />
Ct value<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
D0<br />
D7 at RT°<br />
D7 at +4°C<br />
D7 at ‐20°C<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19<br />
Calves<br />
Figure 4: Stability <strong>of</strong> Ear notch samples<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our results show that (i) ear notch matrix <strong>of</strong>fers the same<br />
sensitivity for PI calves detection than blood, (ii) the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
one PI calf amoung a pool <strong>of</strong> 10 samples can be performed on<br />
both matrixes, and (iii) the ear notch is a stable matrix (at +4°C<br />
and -20°C) for the diagnosis by PCR.<br />
The complete analysis method developed on ear notches<br />
(TaqVet BVDV Screening and MagVet Universal Isolation<br />
kit) is sensitive enough to detect a PI calf in pool <strong>of</strong> 10 samples or<br />
individual analysis. Then it could be used in large scale to control<br />
the disease and decrease the incidence <strong>of</strong> the PI in bovine herds.<br />
Ct value<br />
20<br />
15<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
A special thank to the LVD55-Segilab laboratory to their active<br />
participation in this project.<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19<br />
Calves<br />
Figure 1: Comparison on blood and ear notches matrixes<br />
The results obtained with columns or magnetic beads are similar<br />
for BVD and IPC detection, with a mean difference <strong>of</strong> 1 Ct<br />
between both methods. Extraction with beads shows equivalent<br />
results on PCR sensitivity than columns.
S1 - P - 25<br />
GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY DETERMINATION OF PATHOGENIC PROTOTHECA<br />
Sara Marques 1 , Eliane Silva 1 , Gertrude Thompson 1 , Volker Huss 2<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Porto, ICBAS – CIBIO, Porto, Portugal<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Erlangen-Nuremberg, Biology Department – MPP, Erlangen, Germany<br />
Prototheca spp.; bovine mastitis; internal transcribed spacer (ITS); 16S rDNA; intergenic spacer (IGS)<br />
Introduction<br />
Members <strong>of</strong> the genus Prototheca are ubiquitous nonphotosynthetic<br />
green algae that can be associated with<br />
pathologies in humans and animals (1). The known pathogenic<br />
species in the genus are P. zopfii, P. wickerhamii and P.<br />
blaschkeae (2). Both P. zopfii and P. blaschkeae have been<br />
associated with bovine mastitis (1, 2). Presently this pathology is<br />
recognized as endemic worldwide and is considered a public<br />
health problem (3). Prototheca identification is generally achieved<br />
by phenotypic and molecular characterization, the latter being<br />
used to easily identify Prototheca species. Phylogenetic<br />
relationships <strong>of</strong> Prototheca can be inferred from 18S and 28S<br />
rDNA sequence comparisons (1, 2, 4). The ribosomal internal<br />
transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and plastid ribosomal RNA<br />
operon are less conserved than 18S and 28S rRNA genes and<br />
provide greater interspecific differences that are useful for the<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> strains (5). Thus, the aim <strong>of</strong> the present study<br />
was to determine the genotypic variability within P. zopfii and P.<br />
blaschkeae strains by amplification and sequencing <strong>of</strong> these<br />
regions.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Prototheca isolates used in this study belong to a major collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> milk pathogens obtained from different dairy herds from the<br />
Northwest <strong>of</strong> Portugal. Thirty seven isolates were previously<br />
identified as P. zopfii genotype 2 and five as P. blaschkeae (1).<br />
These isolates were spread and grown on Sabouraud Dextrose<br />
Agar medium (Merck Laboratories, Darmstadt, Germany). In this<br />
study PCR amplification <strong>of</strong> the nuclear ITS region and plastid 16S<br />
rDNA, intergenic spacer (IGS) and partial 23S rDNA were<br />
performed. Briefly, genomic DNA preparation was performed as<br />
previously described (1). For amplification <strong>of</strong> the ITS region<br />
several sets <strong>of</strong> primers were applied and some additives were<br />
used to improve the reaction. The amplification products were<br />
analysed on a 0.8% (wt/vol) agarose gel after staining with<br />
ethidium bromide. Since some <strong>of</strong> the amplifications produced two<br />
bands, these were purified with the QIAquick ® PCR purification kit<br />
(Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and cloned into Topo ® XL PCR Cloning<br />
Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). As some sequences displayed<br />
similarities to the Prototheca plastid IGS region between 16S and<br />
23S rDNA, several other primers for the ITS region were tested<br />
and amplification <strong>of</strong> the 16S rDNA, IGS and part <strong>of</strong> the 23S rDNA<br />
were also performed.<br />
Results<br />
ITS amplification <strong>of</strong> Prototheca isolates retrieved bands <strong>of</strong> the<br />
expected size only in few cases (Fig. 1). Sequencing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
amplified products retrieved nuclear ITS <strong>of</strong> only 3 P. zopfii strains<br />
with some differences between them. No ITS sequences were<br />
obtained for P. blaschkeae.<br />
zopfii isolates had identical sequences, and the 5 P. blaschkeae<br />
isolates sequences could be assigned to 2 groups which differed<br />
in two positions within the 16S rRNA gene and one position in the<br />
tRNA-alanine gene.<br />
Figure 2: 16S rDNA amplification <strong>of</strong> some P. zopfii (Pz1-2) and P.<br />
blaschkeae (Pb1-2) isolates with 16S universal primers. All PCR<br />
fragments have a size close to the expected size <strong>of</strong> about 1,500<br />
bp. Lane EcoRI + HindIII – molecular weight standard, -C,<br />
negative control without DNA.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The variability <strong>of</strong> nuclear ITS and plastid rDNA sequences<br />
between and within P. zopfii and P. blaschkeae strains is shown<br />
for the first time. Within the ITS sequences <strong>of</strong> the P. zopfii<br />
isolates, similarities between 92 and 96% were found. The plastid<br />
sequences obtained for P. zopfii and P. blaschkeae isolates<br />
showed only 82.7% similarity between each other. Similarity <strong>of</strong><br />
the complete 16S rDNA alone was 85.3%, which was lower than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the respective 18S rDNA (98.0%) (1). Solving the<br />
amplification problem and sequencing <strong>of</strong> the ITS region together<br />
with the plastid rRNA operon from all isolates will be <strong>of</strong> great<br />
value for Prototheca population genetics and epidemiology.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e<br />
Tecnologia, Portugal, grant SFRH/BD/28892/2006.<br />
References<br />
1. Marques, S, Silva, E, Kraft, C, Carvalheira, J, Videira, A, Huss, V,<br />
Thompson, G (2008). Bovine mastitis associated with Prototheca<br />
blaschkeae. J Clin Microbiol; 46, 1941-1945.<br />
2. Janosi, S, Ratz, F, Szigeti, G, Kulcsar, M, Kerenyi, J, Lauko, T, Katona,<br />
F, Huszenicza, G (2001). Review <strong>of</strong> the microbiological, pathological, and<br />
clinical aspects <strong>of</strong> bovine mastitis caused by the alga Prototheca zopfii. Vet<br />
Q, 23, 58-61.<br />
3. Malinowski, E, Lassa, H, Klossowska, A (2002). Isolation <strong>of</strong> Prototheca<br />
zopfii from inflamed secretion <strong>of</strong> udders. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 46, 295-299.<br />
4. Moller, A, Truyen, U, Roesler, U (2007). Prototheca zopfii genotype 2:<br />
the causative agent <strong>of</strong> bovine protothecal mastitis? Vet Microbiol, 120,<br />
370-374.<br />
5. Pröschold, T, Darienko, T, Silva, PC, Reisser, W, Krienitz, L (2011). The<br />
systematics <strong>of</strong> Zoochlorella revisited employing an integrative approach.<br />
Environ Microbiol, 13, 350-364.<br />
Figure 1: ITS amplification <strong>of</strong> some P. zopfii (Pz1-6) and P.<br />
blaschkeae (Pb) isolates with ITS primers. All PCR fragments<br />
should have a size <strong>of</strong> approximately 1,300 bp, however different<br />
sizes were found and in some isolates two bands were amplified.<br />
Lane ClaI – molecular weight standard, -C, negative control<br />
without DNA.<br />
The complete plastid 16S rDNA <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the isolates was<br />
amplified (Fig. 2). Almost complete sequences <strong>of</strong> the plastid<br />
rRNA operon were obtained for 8 Prototheca isolates. Three P.
S1 - P - 26<br />
DETECTION OF SAXITOXINE (PSP MARINE BIOTOXIN) IN MOLLUSCS BY ELISA<br />
Miroslaw M. Michalski, Katarzyna Grądziel-Krukowska<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Hygiene <strong>of</strong> Food <strong>of</strong> Animal Origin, Puławy, Poland<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> the Department: pr<strong>of</strong>. Jacek Osek<br />
Marine biotoxins, saxitoxine, Elisa, intoxication<br />
Introduction<br />
Marine biotoxins are a group <strong>of</strong> natural toxins that sometimes<br />
accumulate in shellfish. Many biotoxins are produced by marine<br />
algae (phytoplankton, including diatoms and din<strong>of</strong>lagellates) and<br />
can accumulate in fish or shellfish if they ingest these algae.<br />
There are several types <strong>of</strong> illnesses, caused by marine biotoxins,<br />
that are connected with the consumption <strong>of</strong> contaminated<br />
shellfish. They include Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP), and<br />
Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP), Amnesic Shellfish<br />
Poisoning (ASP). Saxitoxin is a naturally produced marine<br />
biotoxin by several gonyaulacoid or gymnodinioid din<strong>of</strong>lagellates,<br />
including Alexandrium, Gymnodinium, Pyrodinium, and has also<br />
been found in freshwater cyanobacterial strains such as<br />
Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii<br />
The toxins responsible for PSP are heterocyclic guanidines<br />
(saxitoxins) and there are over 21 known congeners. Substitution<br />
at R4 results in substantial changes in toxicity. Saxitoxin (STX)<br />
binds with a high affinity to site 1 on the voltage dependent<br />
sodium channel, inhibiting channel opening (1, 3)<br />
Table 1<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> shellfish<br />
1.Mule<br />
Mytilus edulis<br />
2.Oysters<br />
Crassostrea gigas<br />
3.Vongole<br />
Tapes<br />
semidecussatus<br />
4.Scallops<br />
Pecten spp.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
samples<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> samples:<br />
bld 1 /pos 2 /exc 800<br />
µg/ 3<br />
24 5/19/0<br />
13 3/10/0<br />
Country <strong>of</strong><br />
origin<br />
Holland,<br />
Norway,<br />
France<br />
Holland,<br />
France<br />
12 2/10/0 Italia<br />
10 2/7/0 Holland<br />
Total numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
sam-samples<br />
59<br />
1 - bellow limit <strong>of</strong> detection<br />
2 - range 50-800 µg/kg<br />
3 – concentartion in molluscs meat more than 800 µg/kg<br />
PSP toxic syndrome is due primarily to the consumption <strong>of</strong><br />
molluscs contaminated by PSP toxins as a result <strong>of</strong> filter-feeding<br />
by toxic din<strong>of</strong>lagellates. After intoxication <strong>of</strong> PSP, the effects are<br />
predominantly neurological and include tingling, burning,<br />
numbness, drowsiness, incoherent speech, and respiratory<br />
paralysis. Symptoms <strong>of</strong> the disease develop fairly rapidly, within<br />
0.5 to 2 hours after ingestion <strong>of</strong> the shellfish, depending on the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> toxin consumed. In severe cases respiratory paralysis<br />
is common, and death may occur if respiratory support is not<br />
provided (1, 2, 3). In the EU law a limit for PSP toxins in bivalve<br />
molluscs is laid down at 80 g STX eq/100 g <strong>of</strong> shellfish meat (4).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The RIDACSREEN ® FAST PSP SC test was used for the<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> PSP toxins in shellfish. This assay is a direct<br />
competitive Elisa for PSP and related algae toxins in mussels. All<br />
reagents are contained in the test kit. Detection limit <strong>of</strong> test is 50<br />
µg/kg <strong>of</strong> shellfish meat. A total <strong>of</strong> four different types <strong>of</strong> mussels<br />
were used for analysis. Live shellfish samples used in this study<br />
were collected from warehouses and markets. A total number <strong>of</strong><br />
59 samples were investigated. Preparation <strong>of</strong> samples and Elisa<br />
test was performed according to the test producer instruction.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Fifty nine samples <strong>of</strong> shellfish meat were analysed by the Elisa<br />
test. In 46 samples PSP biotoxins were found, expressed as<br />
saxitoxin-HCl, in range 50-800 µg/kg. In 12 samples the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> PSP toxins was bellow the limit <strong>of</strong> the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the test and no sample with more than 800 µg/kg <strong>of</strong> PSP toxins<br />
in mussels. The present experiment clearly showed that the<br />
shellfish available on Polish marked are, as a food, safe for<br />
consumers.<br />
References<br />
1. EFSA. 2009. Marine biotoxins in shellfish – Saxitoxin group.<br />
Scientific Opinion <strong>of</strong> the Panel on Contaminants in the Food<br />
Chain. The EFSA Journal, 2009, 1019, 1-76<br />
2. Michalski Miroslaw. Biotoksyny morskie - występowanie i metody<br />
analizy. Żywność.Nauka.Technologia.Jakość. 2006, 3(48), 16-22<br />
3. Michalski Mirosław: Paralityczne toksyny morskie jako zagrożenie dla<br />
zdrowia konsumenta. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2007, 63(12), 1530-1533<br />
4. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 <strong>of</strong> The European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food <strong>of</strong><br />
animal origin.<br />
Results<br />
The content <strong>of</strong> saxitoxine determined by the Elisa test in the four<br />
species <strong>of</strong> shellfish is shown in table 1.
S1 - P - 27<br />
PROFICIENCY TESTING (PT) FOR CHEMICAL LABORATORIES PERFORMING ANALYSIS OF MEAT<br />
AND MEAT PRODUCTS ORGANISED BY NVRI IN PULAWY<br />
Michalski Miroslaw<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Hygiene <strong>of</strong> Food <strong>of</strong> Animal Origin, Puławy, Poland<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> the Department: pr<strong>of</strong>. Jacek Osek<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing, z-score, chemical analysis<br />
Introduction<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is the qualification <strong>of</strong> laboratories with help<br />
<strong>of</strong> interlaboratory pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing (PT) in range <strong>of</strong> analysed<br />
substances. Results <strong>of</strong> analyses should be credible with<br />
previously determined standard uncertainty <strong>of</strong> measurement.<br />
The harmonization <strong>of</strong> correct results <strong>of</strong> chemical analysis is<br />
secure by the validation <strong>of</strong> analytic methods, standard uncertainty<br />
for individual measurement or for the method <strong>of</strong> analysis, using<br />
certified reference materials <strong>of</strong> and participation in pr<strong>of</strong>iciency<br />
testing (3). Information on the precision and accuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
results are to be taken into consideration in the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assay (3,4,5). In case <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> reference materials or reference<br />
certified materials, participation in PT is the only method for<br />
confirming the technical competences <strong>of</strong> the laboratory (1,5).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Pasteurized meat product was used for analysis. Every<br />
participant received sample together with instruction <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation as well as a document which allows to introduce<br />
the sample in a quality system <strong>of</strong> laboratory. In this sample<br />
laboratory personnel should analyse at least one <strong>of</strong> parameters<br />
as sodium nitrate, salt (NaCl) by Mohr method, water, fat,<br />
phosphorus, proteins, ash, hydroxyproline, and starch. Deadline<br />
<strong>of</strong> realisation <strong>of</strong> analyses was appointed by organizer. The<br />
homogeneity <strong>of</strong> material was estimated on the basis investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> eight random choosen samples from designed to analysis,<br />
applying the criterion <strong>of</strong> the homogeneity Ss0,3 .<br />
Statistical calculations and homogeneity assessments have been<br />
conducted in accordance with the principles stipulated in ISO<br />
13528:2005 “Statistical methods for use in pr<strong>of</strong>iciency testing by<br />
inter-laboratory comparisons”.<br />
In the pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test 25 laboratories participated (<strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
veterinary labs as well as private) and 31 analysts. Laboratory<br />
code numbers were known only for laboratory and organizer. The<br />
participants <strong>of</strong> PT applied the standardized method or such,<br />
which they use during normal analysis, after their validation.<br />
Reference values for each analysed parameter were calculated<br />
with a help <strong>of</strong> algorithm A, according to Standard PN-ISO 57255:<br />
2000, based on results from participating laboratories.<br />
The calculated reference values as well as standard deviations<br />
made it possible to calculate z-score accoprding to the formula:<br />
z <br />
*<br />
x<br />
X<br />
*<br />
s<br />
where,<br />
s*- standard deviation for pr<strong>of</strong>iciency assessment<br />
X*- assigned value<br />
x - participant result<br />
For the purposes <strong>of</strong> performance assessment for a single round,<br />
z scores are interpreted as follows:<br />
z≤ 2.00 satisfactory result<br />
2.00 < zand < 3.00 questionable result<br />
z≥ 3.00 unsatisfactory result<br />
Table1: Results <strong>of</strong> statistical calculation for tested samples<br />
NaNO 3<br />
[mg/kg]<br />
NaCl<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Nitrogen<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Water<br />
[g/100]<br />
Fat<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Phosphoru<br />
s [mg/kg]<br />
Ash<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Starch<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Hydroxypr<br />
oline<br />
[g/100g]<br />
Reference<br />
value 18,39 2,22 2,84 76,07 1,09 4308,3 2,91 1,78 0,040<br />
Std 3,39 0,05 0,03 0,12 0,12 100,92 0,03 0,16 0,005<br />
Coefficient<br />
<strong>of</strong> variation<br />
cv (%)<br />
18,43 2,25 1,06 0,16 11,01 2,34 1,03 8,99 12,50<br />
Table 2: The number <strong>of</strong> results for respective parameters, which<br />
z score carried out |z| > 2<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
results<br />
2
S1 - P - 28<br />
SPECIFIED RISK MATERIAL REMOVAL PRACTICES:<br />
CAN WE REDUCE THE BSE HAZARD TO HUMAN HEALTH?<br />
D. Pitardi 1 , D. Meloni 1 , C. Maurella 1 , D. Di Vietro 1 , L. Nocilla 1 , A. Piscopo 2 , E. Pavoletti 3 , M. Negro 4 , M. Caramelli 1 ,<br />
E. Bozzetta 1 .<br />
1 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154, Torino, Italy.<br />
2 Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale 1AG, Viale della Vittoria 321, 92100, Agrigento, Italy.<br />
3 Azienda Sanitaria Locale VC, Via Benadir 35, 13100, Vercelli, Italy.<br />
4 Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN1, Corso Francia 12, 12100, Cuneo, Italy.<br />
BSE; vCJD; Spinal cord; SRM Contamination; Alternative slaughter practices.<br />
Introduction<br />
Following the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)<br />
epidemics across Europe in the early 1990s, the removal <strong>of</strong><br />
designated BSE specified risk material (SRM) became<br />
mandatory to minimize the risk to consumers <strong>of</strong> exposure to the<br />
infectious agent. Despite this preventive measure, crosscontamination<br />
<strong>of</strong> edible meat with SRM can occur during<br />
conventional slaughter (1-4).<br />
Currently, there are no markers that can identify the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
SRM in meat as a whole. Nevertheless, some assays are able to<br />
detect traces <strong>of</strong> CNS, hence this parameter is <strong>of</strong>ficially taken as<br />
indicative <strong>of</strong> SRM contamination.<br />
In this two-stage study, we carried out a survey to estimate the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> carcass contamination at two slaughterhouses, one<br />
large and the other medium-sized; we then compared three<br />
different methods (conventional vs. suction vs. water-jet) for<br />
spinal cord removal employed at the large slaughterhouse to<br />
assess their performance in preventing the spread <strong>of</strong> CNT over<br />
the carcass.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> CNS contamination<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> CNS contamination by the conventional<br />
technique was estimated from a total <strong>of</strong> 216 carcasses from a<br />
large slaughterhouse and 196 from a medium-sized one. In both<br />
abattoirs the carcasses were split with a hand-guided belt-type<br />
saw and the spinal cord cut along its length was removed from<br />
each side <strong>of</strong> the carcass. Sampling was performed immediately<br />
after spinal cord removal.<br />
Alternative techniques<br />
Two alternative spinal cord removal techniques were compared<br />
to the conventional method. In both techniques, the SRM is<br />
extracted before the carcass is split (by suction or by water-jet).<br />
Comparative study<br />
The estimated sample size (50 carcasses) was sampled for each<br />
SRM removal method: conventional; suction; and water-jet. The<br />
specimens were withdrawn immediately after carcass splitting.<br />
Sample collection and preparation<br />
Bovine older than 12 months were included in the study. Samples<br />
were collected from a defined area on the medial surface <strong>of</strong> each<br />
half <strong>of</strong> the split carcass. The area was selected and marked <strong>of</strong>f<br />
on the paravertebral muscles.<br />
Testing activity<br />
A commercially available ELISA kit (Ridascreen® Risk Material<br />
10/5, R-Biopharm), which detects GFAP as a marker for CNS,<br />
was used to analyze the samples. In order to facilitate application<br />
<strong>of</strong> the test for screening purposes, in previous studies we<br />
validated its qualitative use by plotting an ROC curve to set a<br />
useful cut-<strong>of</strong>f value (2).<br />
Results<br />
Using a qualitative approach, samples were defined as positive if<br />
CNS tissue was detected at a concentration ≥0.049% (2).<br />
Samples tested positive in 130/216 carcasses (60.2%, 95% CI<br />
53.3-66.8) from the large slaughterhouse and in 152/196 (77.6%,<br />
95% CI, 71-83.2) <strong>of</strong> those from the medium-sized one (Table I).<br />
The conventional slaughter technique was associated with an<br />
overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> CNS contamination <strong>of</strong> 68.4% (95% CI, 53 -<br />
83).<br />
The comparative study showed a CNS contamination <strong>of</strong> 62%<br />
(95% CI, 47.2-75.3) associated with the conventional technique,<br />
60% (95% CI, 45.2-73.6) with the suction technique, and 36%<br />
(95% CI, 22.9-50.8) with the water-jet system (Table II). The<br />
difference among the three methods appeared to be significant<br />
(P=0.0047).<br />
Table I: Conventional method - positive samples stratified<br />
according to contamination level and type <strong>of</strong> abattoir.<br />
Large abattoir Medium abattoir<br />
CNS contamination positive samples positive samples<br />
(%)<br />
(%)<br />
Low ( ≥ 0.049 and
S1 - P - 29<br />
LOW PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTIONS ON POULTRY FARMS IN THE<br />
NETHERLANDS<br />
Sylvia Pritz-verschuren 1 , Jeanet van der Goot 1 , Johan Bongers 1 , Guus Koch 1<br />
1<br />
Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong> Wageningen UR,Lelystad,The Netherlands<br />
Avian Influenza Virus, low pathogenic, poultry<br />
Introduction<br />
Outbreaks <strong>of</strong> highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) have a<br />
devastating economic impact on the poultry industry and also<br />
causes social distress. In countries free <strong>of</strong> HPAI, epidemics start<br />
after introduction <strong>of</strong> low pathogenic AI virus which may evolves to<br />
HPAI viruses. Early detection <strong>of</strong> AI infection is crucial for the<br />
control <strong>of</strong> outbreaks. Infections <strong>of</strong> LPAI viruses in laying birds is<br />
subclinical or causes mild symptoms such as a drop in egg<br />
production.<br />
Early detection <strong>of</strong> AI virus infection is crucial to prevent HPAI<br />
outbreaks. Therefore, in the Netherlands LPAI infections are<br />
detected by early warning and compulsory serological monitoring<br />
programmes <strong>of</strong> all poultry farms.<br />
In the period <strong>of</strong> 2006-2011, an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> LPAI<br />
virus infections in poultry was observed. A number <strong>of</strong> possible<br />
causes is discussed.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Serological samples were screened in an competitive NP<br />
antibody ELISA and the positive samples were confirmed and<br />
typed by hemagglutination inhibition and neuraminidase inhibition<br />
test.<br />
For detection <strong>of</strong> the virus an in house developed PCR with the M-<br />
gene as target is used. Positive samples were tested in an H5<br />
and H7 specific PCR described by the community EU reference<br />
lab (AHVLA, Weybridge). H5 and H7 negative samples were<br />
subtyped using a generic, hemagglutinin and neuraminidasespecific<br />
RT-PCR (1) followed by sequencing the PCR product.<br />
Results<br />
The number LPAI introductions either detected by PCR and/or<br />
antibodies increased in the period 2006-2011, especially since<br />
2009 (Table 1). Although there is a marked increase in the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> detections, the period is too short to speak about a<br />
tendency.<br />
Table 1. Number <strong>of</strong> poultry farms where LPAI viruses and/or<br />
antibodies were detected in period 2006-2011<br />
Year<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> LPAI Number <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
detected farms infections<br />
2006 4 2<br />
2007 13 8<br />
2008 10 9<br />
2009 11 10<br />
2010 20 18<br />
2011 33 23<br />
Total 91 70<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> possible causes for the increase <strong>of</strong> LPAI detections<br />
are:<br />
More intensive search for LPAI viruses and introduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
early warning.<br />
The early warning program was started in 2008/2009. However<br />
most farms (57/70) are detected by serological monitoring which<br />
was in place since 2004. So, this can’t be an explanation for the<br />
increase.<br />
Higher sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the serological test used for the monitoring.<br />
Sera are tested in an ELISA by the Dutch Animal Health Service<br />
(AHS). In January 2009 the AHS has changed to another test.<br />
However, the validation tests revealed no differences in<br />
sensitivity between the old and new test.<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam there is no<br />
sufficient evidence to assume such an increased prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
LPAI viruses in wild birds.<br />
An increase <strong>of</strong> the number wild birds in the Netherlands.<br />
Reports <strong>of</strong> Dutch Bird research group (SOVON) shows that the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> wild birds was more or less constant in the period<br />
2004-2009. Thus this also can’t explain the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> detection.<br />
More contact between poultry and wild birds due to the increased<br />
number <strong>of</strong> outdoor-layer farms.<br />
Data <strong>of</strong> the Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs (PVE)<br />
shows that the total number <strong>of</strong> outdoor-layer farms was lower in<br />
2008 and 2009 than in the years before and gradually increased<br />
again in 2010 and 2011.<br />
Different subtypes are found on the poultry farms (Table 2). In<br />
poultry H5, H7 and H8 viruses and/or antibodies are the most<br />
common in the period 2006-2011. For serology the<br />
neuraminidase inhibition test is used for typing, however the test<br />
is not suitable to test large numbers <strong>of</strong> sera samples and<br />
therefore the neuraminidase type is not yet determined for most<br />
farms, because 57/70 farms were detected in the serological<br />
monitoring programme. Therefore the most common N-type is<br />
not known.<br />
Table 2. Avian Influenza virus subtypes detected in poultry farms<br />
in the Netherlands in period 2006-2011<br />
HA N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N?* Totaal<br />
H1 2 1 3 6<br />
H2 2 1 3<br />
H3 2 2<br />
H4<br />
H5 1 10 11<br />
H6 1 1 3 5<br />
H7 1 1 2 4 4 12<br />
H8 3 9 12<br />
H9 3 1 4<br />
H10 2 1 3<br />
H11<br />
H12 1 1<br />
H13<br />
H14 1 1<br />
H16<br />
H?* 1 13 14<br />
Totaal 4 5 3 5 2 6 49 74<br />
* Typing <strong>of</strong> the haemagglutinine and/or neuraminidase was not<br />
possible.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Every year in the Netherlands more infections with LPAI viruses<br />
are detected in poultry farms . Up to now we did not identify an<br />
obvious explanation for the increase <strong>of</strong> LPAI virus introduction in<br />
poultry. However, different subtypes are found. The most<br />
common H-types are H5, H7 and H8.<br />
References<br />
1. Gall,A, H<strong>of</strong>fmann, B, Harder, Timm, Grund, C, Ehricht, R, Beer, M<br />
(2009). Rapid an Highly Sensitive Neuramidase Subtyping <strong>of</strong> Avian<br />
Influenza Viruses by Use <strong>of</strong> a Diagnostic DNA Microarray. J. <strong>of</strong> Clin.<br />
Microbiol., 47, 2985-2988<br />
A increased prevalence <strong>of</strong> LPAI viruses in wild birds.<br />
The prevalence varies per season, year, wild bird and location,<br />
but from a wild bird surveillance studies performed by the group
S1 - P - 30<br />
DETECTION OF BRACHYSPIRA HYODYSENTERIAE AND BRACHYSPIRA PILOSICOLI IN SWISS PIGS<br />
USING A COMBINATION OF CULTURE AND PCR<br />
Sarah Prohaska 1 , Helen Huber 1 , Titus Sydler 2 , Max M. Wittenbrink 1<br />
1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Zurich, Switzerland<br />
2<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Zurich, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
Swine dysentery and porcine intestinal spirochaetosis caused by<br />
pathogenic Brachyspira (B.) spp. (B. hyodysenteriae and<br />
B. pilosicoli) lead to considerable economic loss and are<br />
therefore <strong>of</strong> increasing importance to the pig industry.<br />
B. hyodysenteriae colonise the epithelium <strong>of</strong> the large intestine<br />
and subsequently induce severe mucohaemorrhagic colitis<br />
showing the typical signs <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea containing blood and plugs<br />
<strong>of</strong> mucus (1). Infections with B. pilosicoli however are<br />
characterised by moderate growth loss and mild diarrhoea (2).<br />
The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
B. hyodysenteriae and B. pilosicoli in Swiss pig herds by a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> culture and PCR.<br />
Swine, Brachyspira spp., culture, PCR<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Over a time period <strong>of</strong> three years (2009-2011) ligated colon<br />
sections (n=140) from dissected pigs as well as faecal swabs<br />
(n= 661) collected on 228 Swiss pig farms were subjected to a<br />
cultural assay and subsequent PCR for the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
B. hyodysenteriae and B. pilosicoli. Faecal swabs were taken<br />
from pigs suffering from acute diarrhoea.<br />
For culture, the selective BJ-Agar (Trypticase soy agar<br />
supplemented with 5% cattle blood and Colistin, Vancomycin,<br />
Spectinomycin, Spriramycin and Rifampicin) was used (3). Plates<br />
were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 42°C for 4-6 days.<br />
To evaluate the presence <strong>of</strong> Brachyspira spp., native<br />
preparations <strong>of</strong> colony material were investigated by darkfield<br />
microscopy. If spirochaetes were found, DNA was extracted from<br />
suspicious colonies. Subsequently, PCR using two primer pairs<br />
for the detection <strong>of</strong> B. hyodysenteriae and B. pilosicoli was<br />
performed (4).<br />
Results<br />
In two <strong>of</strong> the 140 (1.4%) tested colon sections B. hyodysenteriae<br />
could be detected, whereas B. pilosicoli was not found in these<br />
samples (Figure 1).<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> faecal swabs, cultivation and subsequent confirmation<br />
by PCR yielded B. hyodysenteriae in 122 (18.5%) samples and<br />
B. pilosicoli in 33 samples (5.0%). However, analysis <strong>of</strong> seven<br />
(1.0%) swabs revealed a co-infection <strong>of</strong> B. hyodysenteriae and<br />
B. pilosicoli (Figure 2).<br />
Figure 2: Results <strong>of</strong> faecal swabs<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> culture and PCR for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Swine<br />
dysentery and intestinal spirochaetosis pro<strong>of</strong>ed to be a<br />
successful tool.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this study show a remarkable presence <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogenic Brachyspira spp. in Switzerland. B. hyodysenteriae<br />
was detected in samples taken from pigs from 12 <strong>of</strong> 26 cantons<br />
in Switzerland. Due to this situation, the Swiss pig health service<br />
implemented a monitoring system <strong>of</strong> pathogenic Brachyspira spp.<br />
starting <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
References<br />
1. Hampson D.J., Atyeo R.F., Combs B.G., 1997. Swine Dysentery 175-<br />
209. In: Intestinal Spirochaetes in Domestic Animals and Humans<br />
(Hampson D.J. and Stanton T.B.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.<br />
2. Taylor D.J., Simmons J.R., Laird H.M., 1980. Production <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea<br />
and dysentery in pigs by feeding pure cultures <strong>of</strong> a spirochaete differing<br />
from Treponema hyodysenteriae. Vet. Rec. 106, 326-332.<br />
3. Dünser M., Schweighardt H., Pangerl R., Awad-Masalmeh M., Schuh<br />
M., 1997. Schweinedysenterie und Sprirochaetendiarrhoe – vergleichende<br />
Untersuchungen serpulinenbedingter Enteritiden. Wien. Tierärztl. Mschr.<br />
84, 151-161.<br />
4. La T., Philips N.D., Hampson D.J. 2003. Development <strong>of</strong> a Duplex PCR<br />
Assay for Detection <strong>of</strong> Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira<br />
pilosicoli in Pig Feces. J.Clin. Microbiol. 41, 3372-3375.<br />
Figure 1: Results <strong>of</strong> ligated colon samples
S1 - P - 31<br />
PRRSV DIAGNOSTICS BY RT-PCR AND DIFFERENT ELISA SYSTEMS IN SERUM AND ORAL FLUID<br />
OF PRRSV VACCINATED PIGS<br />
Tatjana Sattler 1 , Sandra Revilla-Fernández 2 , Adolf Steinrigl 2 , Manfred Berger 2 , Friedrich Schmoll 2<br />
1<br />
University Leipzig, Large Animal Clinic for Internal Medicine, Leipzig, Germany<br />
2<br />
AGES, Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Mödling, Austria<br />
PRRSV, ELISA, PCR, oral fluid, pig<br />
Introduction<br />
PRRSV infection is widely distributed all over the world. PRRSV<br />
eradication programs have been developed and PRRSV negative<br />
herds and farms have been established. PRRSV diagnostic tools<br />
with high sensitivity and specificity are essential to control the<br />
disease and to guarantee the negative status <strong>of</strong> the herds (1).<br />
Furthermore, specimens like oral fluid are advantageous in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> costs, working time and animal welfare, and therefore have<br />
been recently proposed for disease monitoring (2). The objective<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study was therefore to evaluate PRRSV RNA and antibody<br />
detection in pig oral fluid by RT-qPCR and commercial ELISA<br />
test systems, respectively. Furthermore, the performance <strong>of</strong><br />
different ELISA systems was compared both, in blood serum and<br />
oral fluid <strong>of</strong> pigs.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Ten pigs (from 8 to 20 weeks <strong>of</strong> age) from a PRRSV negative<br />
farm were injected with an EU-type PRRSV life vaccine (Porcilis ®<br />
PRRS, Intervet, Unterschleißheim, Germany). Blood and oral<br />
fluid samples were taken individually from each pig before, and 4,<br />
7, 14 and 21 days after vaccination. After automated RNA<br />
extraction, serum and oral fluid samples were analysed with an<br />
in-house PRRSV RT-qPCR assay (3).<br />
PRRSV antibody detection in serum and oral fluid was performed<br />
with three different ELISA systems: a) IDEXX PRRS X3 Ab-Test<br />
(IDEXX GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Germany), b) INGEZIM PRRS<br />
UNIVERSAL, c) INGEZIM PRRS DR (both Ingenasa, Madrid,<br />
Spain). Serum samples were diluted according to manufacturer’s<br />
instructions, whereas oral fluid samples were tested without<br />
dilution.<br />
Results<br />
In serum samples (table 1), antibodies were detected in seven<br />
out <strong>of</strong> ten pigs by day 14 after vaccination. One pig<br />
seroconverted at day 21. Two pigs did not seroconvert at all<br />
throughout the study period and also remained RT-qPCR<br />
negative throughout the whole study. Three out <strong>of</strong> ten pigs were<br />
RT-qPCR positive in serum as early as day 4 after vaccination,<br />
while most pigs (7/10) became positive by day 7. One pig<br />
became RT-qPCR positive as late as day 14, while other pigs<br />
became negative in RT-qPCR at this time-point. This animal was<br />
also the last to seroconvert during the study period.<br />
Table 1: Number <strong>of</strong> serum samples positive by PRRSV RT-qPCR<br />
and by three different PRRSV antibody ELISA testkits (a, b, c –<br />
see material and methods)<br />
day 0 (no<br />
vaccination)<br />
day 4 after<br />
vaccination<br />
day<br />
7<br />
day<br />
14<br />
day<br />
21<br />
PCR 0/10 3/10 7/10 5/10 3/10<br />
ELISA<br />
a)<br />
ELISA<br />
b)<br />
ELISA<br />
c)<br />
0/10 0/10 0/10 7/10 8/10<br />
0/10 0/10 0/10 7/10 7/10<br />
0/10 0/10 3/10 7/10 8/10<br />
In oral fluid (table 2), both RT-qPCR and ELISA positive results<br />
(in two <strong>of</strong> the tested ELISA kits) were observed, although<br />
sensitivity was significantly reduced in comparison to serum. The<br />
INGEZIM PRRS DR ELISA (Kit c) did not show positive results at<br />
all in oral fluid.<br />
Table 2: Number <strong>of</strong> oral fluid samples positive by PRRSV RTqPCR<br />
and by three different PRRSV antibody ELISA testkits (a,<br />
b, c – see material and methods)<br />
day 0 (no<br />
vaccination)<br />
day 4 after<br />
vaccination<br />
day<br />
7<br />
day<br />
14<br />
day<br />
21<br />
PCR 0/10 0/10 2/10 2/10 0/10<br />
ELISA<br />
a)<br />
ELISA<br />
b)<br />
ELISA<br />
c)<br />
0/10 0/10 0/10 2/10 3/10<br />
0/10 0/10 0/10 2/10 4/10<br />
0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
PRRSV-antibodies could be detected in serum <strong>of</strong> some pigs as<br />
early as day 7 after vaccination with the INGEZIM PRRS DR<br />
ELISA (Kit c), which was the most sensitive <strong>of</strong> the three ELISA<br />
systems. Results <strong>of</strong> the other two ELISA systems did not differ<br />
substantially from each other, although one pig remained<br />
antibody negative in serum at day 21 with the INGEZIM PRRS<br />
UNIVERSAL (Kit b), while it was found positive in both other<br />
ELISA systems. A seroconversion in this pig, tested with<br />
INGEZIM PRRS UNIVERSAL ELISA, could be expected later<br />
than day 21 after vaccination.<br />
Interestingly, some animals can remain seronegative despite<br />
vaccination, as was the case in this study in two out <strong>of</strong> ten pigs.<br />
The most likely reason was failure <strong>of</strong> the vaccine virus to<br />
replicate in these animals, as indicated by negative RT-qPCR<br />
results at all time-points tested. A similar finding was described in<br />
a previous vaccination study, where one out <strong>of</strong> 20 vaccinated<br />
gilts remained seronegative (4).<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> RT-qPCR and ELISA results obtained from<br />
matched oral fluid and serum samples suggest that testing <strong>of</strong>.oral<br />
fluid is much less sensitive. Lower amounts <strong>of</strong> both PRRSV RNA<br />
and antibodies and/or the presence <strong>of</strong> inhibitory factors can be<br />
expected in oral fluid (5). No positive results in oral fluid samples<br />
were found with the INGEZIM PRRS DR ELISA (kit c).<br />
It can be concluded that all tested ELISA systems were similarly<br />
able to detect PRRSV antibodies after PRRSV life virus<br />
vaccination, whereas INGEZIM PRRS DR ELISA seems to be<br />
the most sensitive. Reliable PRRSV antibody detection in oral<br />
fluid will require validation <strong>of</strong> test kits for this medium. RT-qPCR<br />
results confirmed the antibody detection results in both, serum<br />
and oral fluid.<br />
References<br />
1. große Beilage, E, Bätza, HJ. (2007): PRRSV-eradication: An option for<br />
pig herds in Germany? Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr. 120, 11/12, 470-<br />
479.<br />
2. Kittawornrat, A, Prickett, J, Chittick, W, Wang, C, Engle, M, Johnson, J,<br />
Patnayak, D, Schwartz, T, Whitney, D, Olsen, C, Schwartz, K,<br />
Zimmerman, J. (2010): Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome<br />
virus (PRRSV) in serum and oral fluid samples from individual boars: will<br />
oral fluid replace serum for PRRSV surveillance Virus Res. 154, 1-2,170-6.<br />
3. Revilla-Fernández S, Wallner B, Truschner K, Benczak A, Brem G,<br />
Schmoll F, Mueller M, Steinborn R.(2005): The use <strong>of</strong> endogenous and<br />
exogenous reference RNAs for qualitative and quantitative detection <strong>of</strong><br />
PRRSV in porcine semen. J Virol Methods. 126, 1-2, 21-30.<br />
4. Sipos, W, Indik, S, Irgang, P, Klein, D, Schuh, M, Schmoll, F (2002):<br />
Transfer <strong>of</strong> EU-ML-PRRSV (Porcilis PRRS) from vaccinated to nonvaccinated<br />
gilts. Proc 17th IPVS Congress, Ames, Iowa, USA, 418<br />
5. Chittick, WA, Stensland, WR, Prickett, JR, Strait, EL, Harmon, K, Yoon,<br />
KJ, Wang, C, Zimmerman, JJ (2010): Comparison <strong>of</strong> RNA extraction and<br />
real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction methods for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in<br />
porcine oral fluid specimens. J Vet Diagn Invest, 23, 248-53
S1 - P - 32<br />
RELIABLE DETECTION AND TYPING OF PRRSV USING MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME RT-PCR<br />
Christine Gaunitz, Carsten Schroeder, Marco Labitzke, Eva V. Knoop, Jörg Gabert<br />
Labor Diagnostik GmbH Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany<br />
PRRSV, High Pathogenic, real-time RT-PCR, simultaneous detection<br />
Introduction<br />
Infections with the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory<br />
Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) in swine are very prevalent and<br />
economically most important for the swine industry. Clinical signs<br />
are respiratory disease in piglets and reproductive failure in<br />
pregnant sows.<br />
PRRSV is a single-stranded RNA virus <strong>of</strong> the family Arteriviridae,<br />
order Nidovirales, and classified into the European (EU/I) and<br />
North American (NA/II) genotype. These genotypes show only<br />
55-70 % homology <strong>of</strong> nucleotides in the different genes. In 2006<br />
in China a highly pathogenic (HP) NA-strain emerged, which<br />
shows a deletion <strong>of</strong> around 30 amino acids in the non-structural<br />
protein 2 (Nsp2). Infection with the HP-strain is characterized by<br />
high fever and high mortality in pigs <strong>of</strong> all ages. In the last years<br />
there have been detected also new isolates from Eastern Europe.<br />
Purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop a real-time PCR which<br />
allows reliable detection and differentiation <strong>of</strong> PRRSV strains in<br />
one test run.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
To evaluate analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> VIROTYPE ® PRRSV, titration<br />
studies with in-vitro RNA were performed.<br />
Analytical specificity was proven by testing 12 PRRSV reference<br />
strains from cell culture.<br />
Diagnostic sensitivity was proven by testing the EPIZONE ring<br />
trial panel 2011.<br />
Serum, tissue and saliva samples were tested in comparison to<br />
other PCR assays. Two commercial PCR kits and VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV (Labor Diagnostik GmbH Leipzig, Germany) were used<br />
according to the manufacturer´s recommendations.<br />
Results<br />
The high analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the VIROTYPE ® PRRSV kit was<br />
proven by a titration series <strong>of</strong> in vitro RNA (PRRSV<br />
EU1/EU2/NA/HP [10 8 copies/well to 10 copies/well]), performed<br />
in triplicates <strong>of</strong> ten-fold dilutions. A high correlation between<br />
number <strong>of</strong> copies and amount <strong>of</strong> amplification product was<br />
demonstrated in the range <strong>of</strong> 10 8 to 10 3 and 10 8 to 10 2 copies,<br />
respectively (Fig. 1).<br />
PRRSV EU I<br />
PRRSV NA<br />
Figure 1: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> analytical sensitivity.<br />
PRRSV EU II<br />
PRRSV HP<br />
The analytical specificity was proven by testing a RNA-panel <strong>of</strong><br />
12 PRRSV reference strains comparatively with VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV and two commercial available tests (Test I and Test II).<br />
All reference strains were detected well with the VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV. In comparison to Test II, the VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV kit<br />
detects the EU strains around two Ct-values and the NA strains<br />
around five Ct-values more sensitive. The results <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
test I and VIROTYPE ® PRRSV are comparable (Tab. 1).<br />
Table 1: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> analytical specificity.<br />
VIROTYPE ® PRRSV commercial Test I commercial Test II<br />
Strain<br />
EU NA HP IC PRRSV EU NA IC EU NA IC<br />
Ct<br />
FAM<br />
Ct<br />
TEX<br />
Ct<br />
Cy5<br />
Ct<br />
HEX<br />
Ct<br />
FAM<br />
Ct<br />
FAM<br />
Ct<br />
FAM<br />
Ct HEX<br />
Ct<br />
FAM<br />
Ct<br />
Cy5<br />
Ct<br />
HEX<br />
EU Stendal V953 25.22 - - 34.61 24.62 24.08 - 29.89 24.95 - 35.66<br />
Intervet 22.02 - - 33.22 20.41 19.41 - 28.85 24.65 - -<br />
Cobbelsdorf 23.86 - - 32.65 22.91 22.20 - 29.32 26.02 - -<br />
Stendal V852 23.24 - - 39.96 23.50 21.86 29.68 26.16 - 36.98<br />
Stendal V1904 24.30 - - 39.06 24.48 23.47 29.30 27.63 - 37.41<br />
Stendal V1952/97 26.29 - - 35.41 26.32 24.51 31.32 28.12 - 36.06<br />
Stendal V1445/99 - 21.39 - 34.85 23.80 - 21.17 30.78 - 24.92 34.10<br />
USA VD28775/2 - 21.35 - 29.14 23.94 - 21.61 30.40 - 24.07 39.08<br />
USA VD29949/17 - 22.41 - 28.48 27.72 - 22.18 29.65 - 26.89 -<br />
USA 2 - 19.83 - 30.64 23.07 - 20.44 30.81 - 23.64 -<br />
USA 18 - 19.06 - 31.48 20.47 - 19.50 30.39 - 26.54 -<br />
China - 20.87 22.44 28.36 22.82 - 20.54 29.89 - 25.84 -<br />
Mean Value EU 24.16 23.71 22.59 26.26<br />
Mean Value NA 20.82 23.64 20.91 25.32<br />
In comparison to an in-house PCR (Kleiboeker mod.) performed<br />
at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV detects all<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> the Epizone Ring Trial 2011 more sensitive.<br />
VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV reliably detects the samples <strong>of</strong> the EU-2,<br />
EU-3, EU-4 and the atypical EU genotype 1 (Tab. 2).<br />
Table 2: Results from the EPIZONE ring trial panel 2011.<br />
VIROTYPE® PRRSV Kleiboeker (mod.)<br />
PRRSV-strain Genotyp RNA Dil. EU NA HP IC EU NA<br />
EU Stendal V954 EU-1 10 -2 24.96 - - 26.88 28.24 -<br />
EU Stendal V954 EU-1 10 -3 28.41 - - 27.06 31.53 -<br />
EU Stendal V954 EU-1 10 -4 31.61 - - 26.91 34.12 -<br />
EU Stendal V954 EU-1 10 -5 34.63 - - 27.14 37.61 -<br />
EU Stendal V954 EU-1 10 -6 - - - 28.11 - -<br />
EU Stendal V1952/97 EU-1 10 -1 23.08 - - 27.23 25.82 -<br />
EU Stendal V1952/97 EU-1 10 -2 26.57 - - 27.66 29.17 -<br />
EU Stendal V1952/97 EU-1 10 -3 29.54 - - 26.99 32.19 -<br />
EU Stendal V1952/97 EU-1 10 -4 32.50 - - 26.86 35.25 -<br />
EU Stendal V1952/97 EU-1 10 -5 36.92 - - 27.87 40.31 -<br />
Cobbelsdorf EU-1 1:500 23.33 - - 27.26 26.13 -<br />
Stendal V852 EU-1 1:500 23.55 - - 27.54 25.78 -<br />
Stendal V1904 EU-1 1:500 24.37 - - 27.37 26.72 -<br />
Aus_LT3 EU-2 01:10 24.80 - - 27.59 25.93 -<br />
BY_Bor/59 EU (atypical) 01:10 32.81 - - 27.79 33.63 -<br />
BY_231/SZA EU-3 01:10 21.01 - - 27.74 23.78 -<br />
BY_8380/OKT_2p EU-4 01:10 25.70 - - 27.59 28.36 -<br />
China NA-HP 10 -2 - 20.01 22.14 26.22 - 21.83<br />
China NA-HP 10 -3 - 23.93 25.79 26.89 - 26.06<br />
China NA-HP 10 -4 - 27.61 29.25 27.56 - 28.43<br />
China NA-HP 10 -5 - 29.93 31.71 26.96 - 32.34<br />
China NA-HP 10 -6 - 37.1 34.96 27.50 - 35.20<br />
Stendal V1445/99 NA 1:500 - 21.63 - 27.22 - 23.17<br />
USA VD29949/17 NA 1:500 - 22.74 - 26.75 - 24.44<br />
USA 2 NA 1:500 - 21.12 - 27.51 - 22.43<br />
Mean Value 27.12 25.51 29.62 26.74<br />
Standard Deviation 4.19 5.77 4.17 4.88<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
To evaluate sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong> VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV,<br />
titration studies with in-vitro RNA were performed. Serum, tissue<br />
and saliva samples were tested in comparison to other<br />
commercial PCR assays. Testing the EPIZONE PRRSV ring trial<br />
panel, all strains could be detected reliably. East European EU<br />
strains and the atypical EU strain scored positive.<br />
VIROTYPE ®<br />
PRRSV allows the reliable and simultaneously<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> PRRSV EU and NA genotype and the HP strain from<br />
porcine blood, serum, tissue, bronchial swabs, bronchial lavage,<br />
saliva, semen and also cell culture samples. The assay internal<br />
control guarantees the control <strong>of</strong> extraction as well as<br />
amplification. Due to the high sensitivity <strong>of</strong> VIROTYPE ® PRRSV<br />
pools <strong>of</strong> five samples can be tested. VIROTYPE ® PRRSV is easy<br />
to use with only one reaction-mix.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The EPIZONE ring trial panel and the panel <strong>of</strong> 12 PRRSV<br />
reference strains were kindly provided by K. Wernike and B.<br />
H<strong>of</strong>fmann, Federal Institute for Animal Health, Germany.<br />
References<br />
1. Wernike et al., Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus:<br />
inter-laboratory ring trial to evaluate real-time RT-PCR detection methods,<br />
submitted – under review
S1 - P - 33<br />
APPLICATION OF A HERD PROGRAMME BASED ON CONTROL MEASURES AND LABORATORY<br />
MONITORING TO ERADICATE A LEPTOSPIRA OUTBREAK IN A LARGE DAIRY CATTLE HERD<br />
M.T. Scicluna, G. Manna, F. Rosone, A. Caprioli, R. Frontoso, , G.L. Autorino<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana, 00178 Roma Italia<br />
Leptospira serovar hardjo, management, laboratory diagnosis<br />
Introduction<br />
In Italy, the application <strong>of</strong> severe sanitary measures, including<br />
animal movement restriction are mandatory on the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
Leptospira infection and are lifted only after the removal <strong>of</strong> all<br />
seropositive animals. In the attempt <strong>of</strong> reducing economic losses<br />
deriving from these actions, a herd control programme was<br />
applied in a dairy intensive farm, in which the infection had been<br />
diagnosed, based on the combination <strong>of</strong> preventive, treatment<br />
and biosecurity measures, aiming at the sterilization <strong>of</strong> carriers<br />
and prevention <strong>of</strong> new cases <strong>of</strong> infection (1,2,3,4). The primary<br />
objective was to accelerate the control/eradication <strong>of</strong> the infection<br />
which was evaluated by monitoring the absence <strong>of</strong> its circulation<br />
with the aid <strong>of</strong> serological and molecular techniques and not as<br />
requested by the Italian Regulation, through the sole removal <strong>of</strong><br />
the seropositive animals. Following is the description <strong>of</strong> the<br />
supplementary measures adopted and the actions applied for the<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the control protocol.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Following the notification <strong>of</strong> leptospira diagnosis, an extensive<br />
serological investigation was undertaken in the farm <strong>of</strong> 600<br />
producing cows, to verify if the infection was actively circulating:<br />
the random sampling scheme (Table 1) adopted, allowed the<br />
estimation <strong>of</strong> a prevalence <strong>of</strong> at least 50%, with a standard error<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10% and a confidence interval <strong>of</strong> 95%. The serological method<br />
used was the microagglutination test (MAT) described in the OIE<br />
manual, employing the serovar hardjo. A sample was considered<br />
positive when presenting a titre > to 1/100 (6).<br />
The supplementary control plan applied on the farm was based<br />
on the following points:<br />
- preventive measures, based on vaccination to limit new cases<br />
contributing to the further spread <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis. The vaccine<br />
employed, produced by the Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>illatico Sperimentale<br />
<strong>of</strong> Umbria and Marche, contained serovar hardjo and was<br />
administered as prescribed to all animals.<br />
- antibiotic treatment was adopted to sterilize carrier animals and<br />
eliminate primary source <strong>of</strong> infection. Two different antibiotics<br />
were chosen for economical and management reasons. (1,6) The<br />
more economical, Penistrep ®, 25mg/kg b.w., was for 3<br />
consecutive days used in animals managed individually. To avoid<br />
any impact <strong>of</strong> treatment on the sale <strong>of</strong> milk, antibiotics were<br />
administered when the producing animals were dried <strong>of</strong>f.<br />
Treatment was conducted so as to ensure that all animals <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same group received it all together, to avoid infection <strong>of</strong><br />
seronegative subjects, after the disappearance <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment. These animals received a single dose <strong>of</strong> 20 mg/kg<br />
b.w., <strong>of</strong> Duphaciclina 300 LA®.<br />
- Biosecurity measures aimed at further limiting the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
leptospira in the environment, consisted in: isolation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different units and their drinking systems in relation to whether<br />
these had undergone antibiotic treatment and complete<br />
vaccination; exclusive use <strong>of</strong> artificial insemination; systematic<br />
draining <strong>of</strong> paddocks to avoid water and urine stagnation;<br />
confinement, feeding and milking last <strong>of</strong> untreated animals.<br />
On conclusion <strong>of</strong> the control plan, actions were set up to verify its<br />
efficacy. These consisted in the microbiological examination <strong>of</strong><br />
272 urine samples <strong>of</strong> the animals in the different productive units,<br />
using the same sampling scheme described for the<br />
serosurveillance. These were examined in a SYBR Green Real<br />
Time PCR, specific for pathogenic Leptospira (7). Advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
this test is that it can identify the carrier state even in a<br />
serologically positive animal and compared to the microbiological<br />
isolation, is fast and highly specific. Although reaction inhibition<br />
could occur due to the type <strong>of</strong> sample, using the test at herd<br />
level, increases the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the method.<br />
In addition, a serological control was carried out on 50 animals<br />
born after the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the programme, used also as<br />
seronegative sentinels, placed in the productive units for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> an active circulation. The number <strong>of</strong> sentinel animals<br />
examined aimed to reveal an infection prevalence <strong>of</strong> 5% (IC<br />
95%). These animals were retested at the end <strong>of</strong> their in-contact<br />
period, <strong>of</strong> two months, ensuring exposure, incubation period and<br />
also the production <strong>of</strong> a detectable serological response.<br />
Results & discussion<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the serosurvey (table 1) demonstrate that<br />
leptospira infection was actively circulating in the farm. The<br />
supplementary measures adopted were considered as successful<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> the interruption <strong>of</strong> the leptospira infection in the<br />
different production units, as indicated by the negative results<br />
obtained for the urine samples and the seronegativity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sentinels after their in-contact period with serological positive<br />
animals. Further evidence <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the control<br />
programme was also the seronegativity <strong>of</strong> all animals born after<br />
the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the adoption <strong>of</strong> these measures.<br />
The adoption <strong>of</strong> such a herd control programme would be <strong>of</strong><br />
benefit for both the farmers as well as the Veterinary Authorities,<br />
in that they would have more instruments for the control <strong>of</strong> this<br />
infection.<br />
Table 1. Sample scheme for serological survey.<br />
Productive Consistency Examined Positive N° <strong>of</strong><br />
Unit<br />
(positive)<br />
animals<br />
(Titres)<br />
Heifers 60 34 (5) 5 1(1/100)<br />
1(1/200)<br />
3(1/400)<br />
Pregnant<br />
Heifers<br />
160 54 (38) 38 27 (1/100)<br />
3(1/400)<br />
8(1/200)<br />
Dry cows 140 51 (37) 37 29(1/100) 73<br />
8(1/200)<br />
Primipare 120 48 (26) 26 26 (1/100) 54<br />
Pluripare 160 60 (35) 35 34(1/100) 58<br />
1(1/200)<br />
Fresh 50 33 (12) 12 10(1/100) 36<br />
Lactating<br />
cows<br />
2(1/200)<br />
Problem 80 44 (25) 25 25 (1/100) 57<br />
animals<br />
Sick bay 20 17 (7) 7 7 (1/100) 41<br />
References<br />
1. Bolin CA, Alt DP. 2001. Am J Vet Res. 62(7):995-1000<br />
2. Cortese VS, et al., 2007. Vet Ther. 8(3):201-8<br />
3. Little TW, et al., 1992. Vet Rec. 1;131(5):90-2<br />
4. Little TW, et al., 1992. Vet Rec. 24;131(17):383-6<br />
5. Levett PN Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001 Apr.,: 296–32<br />
6. Alt DP, et al.,2001.J Am Vet Med Assoc.1;219(5):636-9<br />
7. Ahmed A, et. al. 2009. PLoS One 4: Vol 4, Issue 9:1-8<br />
Estimted<br />
prevalence %<br />
15<br />
70
S1 - P - 34<br />
THE SERUM PROTEIN ELECTROPHORETIC PATTERN IN CALVES WITH CHRONIC RESPIRATORY<br />
DISEASES<br />
Csilla Tóthová 1 , Oskar Nagy 1 , Gabriel Kováč 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Clinic for Ruminants, Košice, Slovak Republic<br />
Calves, electrophoresis, respiratory diseases, protein fractions<br />
Introduction<br />
Together with diarrhoea, respiratory tract diseases constitute the<br />
main health problem and overall the most common cause <strong>of</strong><br />
morbidity and mortality in calves and young cattle. In case <strong>of</strong><br />
dairy calf pneumonia, diagnosis and treatment are mainly based<br />
on the observation <strong>of</strong> clinical symptoms. However, in many<br />
cases, the infected calves show only mild clinical symptoms that<br />
could be easily missed in a group <strong>of</strong> calves on a farm (Gänheim<br />
et al., 2007). Therefore, there is a need for objective parameters<br />
that are suitable as indicators <strong>of</strong> health or disease in calf herds<br />
applicable in the laboratory diagnosis <strong>of</strong> diseases. Analytical<br />
methods like serum protein electrophoresis could be useful for<br />
identifying diseased animals. Although it provides useful<br />
information on the pathological conditions associated with<br />
disorders <strong>of</strong> the protein pr<strong>of</strong>ile, the serum protein electrophoresis<br />
in cattle with various organ diseases is a rarely used laboratory<br />
method. Therefore, the objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine<br />
whether chronic respiratory diseases in calves cause changes in<br />
the serum protein electrophoretic pattern.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Twenty-five calves with clinical signs <strong>of</strong> chronic respiratory<br />
diseases <strong>of</strong> various degrees were included into this study. The<br />
calves were <strong>of</strong> a Slovak spotted breed at the age <strong>of</strong> 4-6 months.<br />
Into the evaluation we included the calves with clinical signs <strong>of</strong><br />
the disease manifesting for more than 2 weeks. To compare the<br />
evaluated variables between sick and healthy animals, 29<br />
clinically healthy calves <strong>of</strong> the same age and breed in good<br />
general health were used as a group <strong>of</strong> controls.<br />
Blood samples were collected by a direct puncture <strong>of</strong> v. jugularis.<br />
The separated serum was analyzed for the total serum protein<br />
concentrations and identification <strong>of</strong> serum protein fractions.<br />
Total protein (TP, g/l) concentrations in blood serum were<br />
assayed in the automated biochemical analyser Alize (Lisabio,<br />
France) by the biuret method using commercial diagnostic kits<br />
(Randox). Serum protein fractions were separated by zone<br />
electrophoresis on the buffered agarose gel at pH 8.8 on an<br />
automated electrophoresis system Hydrasys (Sebia Corporate,<br />
France) using commercial diagnostic kits Hydragel 7 Proteine<br />
(Sebia Corporate, France) according to the procedure described<br />
by the manufacturer. The electrophoretic migration was<br />
performed for 15 minutes at 20 °C constantly at 10 W, 40 mA,<br />
and 240 V. After migration, the gels were stained in amidoblack<br />
staining solution, and then destained by acidic solutions and<br />
dried completely. The electrophoretic gels were scanned, and the<br />
serum protein fractions were visualized and displayed on the<br />
densitometry system Epson Perfection V700 (Epson America<br />
Inc., USA). Protein fractions were identified and quantified by<br />
computer s<strong>of</strong>tware Phoresis 5.50 (Sebia Corporate, France).<br />
Serum proteins were separated into the following fractions in the<br />
order from fastest to slowest mobilities: albumin, alpha 1 (α 1 )-,<br />
alpha 2 (α 2 )-, beta 1 (β 1 )-, beta 2 (β 2 )-, and gamma (γ)-globulins.<br />
Albumin: globulin ratios (A/G) were computed from the<br />
electrophoretic scan.<br />
Results<br />
The total serum protein concentrations obtained in the calves<br />
suffering from chronic respiratory diseases were significantly<br />
higher than the values recorded in healthy animals (P
S1 - P - 35<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A BROADLY DETECTING ASSAY FOR FLAVIVIRUS USING A NOVEL CONCEPT<br />
Frederik Widén 1 , Mikael Leijon 1 , Alia Yacoub 1<br />
1<br />
SVA, VIP, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
2<br />
Affiliation Institute name, Department name, City, Country<br />
Introduction<br />
The flavivirus genus is a large group containing enveloped single<br />
stranded RNA viruses. At least 70 different species <strong>of</strong> flaviviruses<br />
have been identified, several cause disease in animals or man<br />
and many can be transmitted from animals to man by vectors.<br />
Climate change and globalisation may cause the virus to appear<br />
in new areas. This can be illustrated with the detection in Europe<br />
<strong>of</strong> Usutuvirus, WNV lineage 2 and Bagazavirus which were<br />
previously present only in Africa or very rarely in Europe.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> a changing situation it is appropriate to test<br />
suspected cases with broadly detecting assays. Previously<br />
developed assay for broad detection <strong>of</strong> flavivirus have poor<br />
sensitivity and show strong variation in sensitivity depending on<br />
virus species. This is very unsatisfactory and therefore a PCR<br />
assay based on a novel approach was developed and tested on<br />
a panel <strong>of</strong> different flaviviruses.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The following viruses were included in the test panel: WNV 1 and<br />
2, Usutuvirus, TBEV (3 strains, Yellow fever virus, Dengue virus<br />
1-4 Japanese Encephalitis virus (two strains) and unrelated virus<br />
(pestivirus and hepacivirus). Several other viruses were used to<br />
test the specificity. Amplification primers were designed using<br />
Jalview etc. The assay was run on a Corbett Rotorgene 3000<br />
real-time thermocycler.<br />
Results<br />
All tested flaviviruses were detected while the unrelated virus was<br />
not detected. The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay was similar for all tested<br />
viruses. For WNV the sensitivity was similar to the specific WNV-<br />
PCR.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our results clearly demonstrate that it is possible to detect many<br />
different flaviviruses with very good sensitivity. It is likely that this<br />
assay will also detect emerging variants <strong>of</strong> previously unknown<br />
flaviviruses. This assay is an important diagnostic tool for<br />
surveillance <strong>of</strong> flavivirus infections.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Thanks are due to the Swedish institute <strong>of</strong> infectious disease<br />
control, to Cecile Baronti at the European Virus Archive project<br />
and to Tamas Bakonyi and Norbert Novotny for providing virus<br />
strains.<br />
References<br />
1. Moreau et al.(2007) A Real-Time RT-PCR Method for the Universal<br />
Detection and Identification <strong>of</strong> Flaviviruses Vector borne and zoonotic<br />
diseases.7,467-477<br />
Flavivirus, PCR, WNV, detection
S1 - P - 36<br />
EXTENDING THE SHELF LIFE OF COMMERCIAL ELISA KITS<br />
Michael O’Connor, Goretti McDonagh and Ronan G. O’Neill<br />
Virology Division, Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food & the Marine Laboratories, Backweston, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland<br />
Kits, ELISA, shelf-life, longevity<br />
Introduction<br />
In <strong>2012</strong>, veterinary laboratories must use an ever expanding<br />
range <strong>of</strong> ELISAs to detect antibodies to, and antigens <strong>of</strong>, a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> viruses which cause endemic, exotic and emerging<br />
diseases. The demand for such non-routine testing is impossible<br />
to anticipate, frequently resulting in kits or portions <strong>of</strong> kits<br />
exceeding their stated expiry dates. Veterinary virology has<br />
developed through in-house and non-commercial ELISAs,<br />
microtitre cell culture neutralisation tests and virus isolation<br />
techniques. Reagents and controls for these tests were produced<br />
in-house or received as gifts. They are in limited supply, valuable<br />
and <strong>of</strong>ten unique. The precedent has been that such reagents<br />
were stored under optimal conditions and used for as long as<br />
they worked. COULD THE SAME APPLY TO COMMERCIAL<br />
ELISAS?<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Competitive and indirect commercial ELISA kits for the antibodies<br />
to, or the antigens <strong>of</strong>, classical and African swine fever viruses,<br />
foot and mouth disease virus, swine vesicular disease virus,<br />
African horse sickness virus, bluetongue virus, porcine<br />
reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, the ruminant<br />
pestiviruses, ovine herpesvirus 2 and Coxiella burnetii were<br />
evaluated. Kits stored beyond their stated expiry dates were<br />
compared at intervals with in-date kits. Control sera remaining<br />
from used kits and pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test sera were retested. Results<br />
obtained with the same samples using within-date and postexpiry<br />
date kits were compared. Anticipated shelf life on storage<br />
was assessed by accelerated degradation at 37 o C.<br />
Results<br />
Kits stored at 4 o C for up to 5 years beyond their expiry date<br />
satisfied all manufacturers’ validity criteria, detected all control<br />
samples and performed satisfactorily in EU and National<br />
Reference Laboratory pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests. Positive control serum<br />
from a blocking ELISA for antibodies to classical swine fever<br />
virus, stored for 98 months (8 years) at 4 o C, reacted similarly to<br />
the control serum supplied with the current kit.<br />
Table 1: Effect <strong>of</strong> storage for 5 years on the performance <strong>of</strong> a<br />
blocking ELISA kit for antibodies to porcine reproductive and<br />
respiratory syndrome virus<br />
9/02/05<br />
Dates tested to 27/09/06 3/10/07 23/03/09 16/04/10<br />
18/05/05<br />
Time beyond<br />
kit expiry date - 9 to - 6 + 10 + 23 + 40 + 53<br />
in months<br />
Optical density<br />
<strong>of</strong> negative 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.3 1.4<br />
control serum<br />
Percentage<br />
inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />
positive<br />
control serum<br />
95 89 89 87 88<br />
Accelerated degradation at 37 o C for a simulated time <strong>of</strong> 27<br />
months had no effect on kits for African horse sickness virus<br />
antigen and African swine fever virus antibody, although a<br />
simulated time <strong>of</strong> 12 months significantly impaired the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> an African horse sickness virus antibody kit.<br />
Table 2: Percentage inhibition (PI) <strong>of</strong> NRL pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test sera<br />
examined for antibodies to FMD serotype O using post-expiry<br />
date blocking ELISA and in-date kit. PI ≥ 50 is positive<br />
Serum<br />
ID<br />
Kit 10 months<br />
post expiry date<br />
Same kit 21<br />
months post expiry<br />
date<br />
New in-date kit<br />
B107 16 22 19<br />
B108 100 100 100<br />
B109 95 95 94<br />
B110 18 28 23<br />
Ready-to-use substrate/chromogen was sometimes found to<br />
have developed colour on prolonged storage at 4 o C. This was<br />
easily recognised and readily replaced by spare reagent from<br />
newer kits/different manufacturers or from commercial sources.<br />
Table 3: Time beyond expiry date (in months) <strong>of</strong> 5 different<br />
commercial ELISAs for antibodies to bluetongue virus, which all<br />
gave identical, correct results in NRL pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test<br />
ELISA Kit 1 Kit 2 Kit 3 Kit 4<br />
Kit<br />
5<br />
Indirect (I) or competitive (C) I C C C I<br />
Months beyond kit expiry date - 6 + 23 + 3 + 18 + 9<br />
Throughout this study, the only less than satisfactory ELISA kit<br />
detected was a recently purchased within-date one, which<br />
yielded atypical and much reduced, although still valid, control<br />
readings coupled with poor specificity. This kit was replaced free<br />
<strong>of</strong> charge by the manufacturer.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The demonstration <strong>of</strong> a shelf life <strong>of</strong> up to 5 years beyond the<br />
manufacturers’ expiry date means that ELISA kits from<br />
previous/occasional studies can be safely used. These could<br />
rapidly identify or exclude novel, rare, exotic or emerging<br />
infections, rather than waiting for fresh kits from laboratory<br />
suppliers. It can also reduce wastage, especially where kit usage<br />
has unexpectedly declined or kits have been stockpiled. Kit<br />
suppliers may also expand their diagnostic range without the<br />
need to continuously produce all items in their catalogues.<br />
Four primary antibodies to cell markers were found by 221<br />
laboratories to be effective beyond their expiry dates (1). Sixtyfive<br />
polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, up to 131 months (11<br />
years) beyond their expiry date, showed no significant<br />
deterioration (2).<br />
The overall performance <strong>of</strong> the ELISA, rather than its expiry date,<br />
should be the absolute determinant <strong>of</strong> whether it may be used.<br />
Performance monitoring should include not only the meeting <strong>of</strong> all<br />
validity criteria but maximum and minimum ODs, sensitivity,<br />
specificity, trends, time for chromogen development, room<br />
temperature etc. Critical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the results by the<br />
laboratory worker will enable early detection <strong>of</strong> problems and<br />
rapid identification <strong>of</strong> significant results, enhancing the value <strong>of</strong><br />
performing ELISA tests.<br />
ELISA kits should be stored at the correct temperature, usually<br />
4 o C, throughout their life. Care should be exercised in<br />
withdrawing reagent aliquots (aseptically or in aliquots) and<br />
removing plate strips/sections. Unused materials/components<br />
should not be left at room temperature while awaiting test<br />
completion. The substrate/chromogen must be examined before<br />
use by decanting into a clear container. SOPs and Quality<br />
Manuals must take account <strong>of</strong> the likely greatly extended shelf<br />
life <strong>of</strong> ELISA kits.<br />
Every laboratory worker using an ELISA plate or strip has the<br />
immediate reassurance <strong>of</strong> seeing that validity criteria and control<br />
parameters have been met as each test is performed and<br />
therefore can have appropriate and logical confidence in the<br />
subsequent results.<br />
References<br />
1. Tubbs, RR, Nagle R, Leslie K, Pettigrew NM, Said JM, Corwin DJ,<br />
Rickert RR & Roche PC. Extension <strong>of</strong> useful reagent shelf life beyond<br />
manufacturers’ recommendations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998, 122, 1051–<br />
1052.<br />
2. Balaton AJ, Drachenberg CB, Rucker C, Vaury P & Papadimitriou JC.<br />
Satisfactory performance <strong>of</strong> primary antibodies beyond manufacturers’<br />
recommended expiration dates. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol<br />
1999, 7, 221–225.
S1 - P - 37<br />
MONITORING OF BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS (BVDV) IN DAIRY CATTLE HERDS IN POLAND<br />
Aleksandra Kuta, Mirosław P. Polak, Magdalena Larska, Jan F. Żmudziński<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Puławy, Poland<br />
Bovine viral diarrhea, bulk tank milk, Ab ELISA, RT-PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), a Pestivirus <strong>of</strong> the family<br />
Flaviviridae is an important pathogen <strong>of</strong> dairy cattle. BVDV<br />
infection can lead to: reduced milk production, diarrhea,<br />
respiratory disorders, interfility, abortion, stillbirth, birth <strong>of</strong><br />
persistently infected (PI) calves. Controlling BVDV is very<br />
complicated and time-consuming. PI animals may be missed if<br />
laboratory monitoring is not implemented at herd level. These<br />
animals shed BVD virus throughout their entire life and they<br />
are the main source <strong>of</strong> infection in a herd. This is the reason<br />
why we should constantly test cattle for the presence <strong>of</strong> BVDV<br />
infection. Farmers’ expectation is that this should be done at<br />
the lowest cost. The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to assess the status<br />
<strong>of</strong> BVDV infection in selected dairy herds based on bulk tank<br />
milk serology and RT-PCR.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The material for the study consisted <strong>of</strong> 162 samples <strong>of</strong> bulk<br />
tank milk collected in 60 dairy herds in Poland. The size <strong>of</strong><br />
these herds was between 15 and 565 cattle. Only one herd<br />
was vaccinated against BVDV and in another one herd clinical<br />
problems were observed.<br />
The SVANOVIR BVDV-Ab ELISA was used to detect<br />
antibodies in bulk tank milk and 35 samples with high<br />
Corrected Optical Density (COD) values were additionally<br />
tested by reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction<br />
(RT-PCR). Viral RNA was extracted from the milk somatic cells<br />
using TRI Reagent (SIGMA-ALDRICH, USA), according to the<br />
manufacturer’s instructions. RT–PCR was carried out using<br />
a commercial kit (Titan One Tube RT – PCR System, Roche,<br />
Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification<br />
was done using primers specific for 5’UTR region, sequences<br />
<strong>of</strong> which were published by Vilcek et al. (2). RT-PCR products<br />
were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> antibody ELISA were interpreted according to<br />
Swedish system <strong>of</strong> classification. Herds were allocated into 4<br />
different classes based on corrected optical density (COD)<br />
value. Class: 0 – (COD:
S1 - P - 38<br />
DETECTION OF BOVINE LEUKAEMIA VIRUS PROVIRAL DNA IN DENDRITIC CELLS BY IN SITU PCR<br />
Maria Szczotka, Jacek Kuźmak, Ewelina Iwan<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Biochemistry Department, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Bovine leukemia, dendritic cells, PCR in situ<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine leukaemia virus (BLV), like human and simian T-<br />
lymphotropic viruses (HTLV-I/II, STLV-I/II, STLV-L), belongs to<br />
the Deltaretrovirus genus <strong>of</strong> Retroviridae family and causes<br />
enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), a disease <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lymphoreticular system.<br />
Dendritic cells (DCs) are most potent antigen presenting cells<br />
(APCs) with unique ability take up and process antigens in the<br />
peripheral blood and tissues. They subsequently migrate to<br />
draining lymph nodes, where they present antigen to resting<br />
lymphocytes. They express higher levels <strong>of</strong> MHC class II and<br />
accesory molecules on their surface than other pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
APCs. DCs are generally considered as relatives <strong>of</strong> monocytes<br />
and macrophages and to be <strong>of</strong> myeloid origin. They appear to<br />
derive from progenitor also capable <strong>of</strong> forming granulocytes<br />
and macrophages, although more recently a committed DC<br />
progenitor, possibly a downstream precursor, has been<br />
identified. The myeloid mature DCs emphasize by the direct<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a form <strong>of</strong> DCs from blood monocytes. All these<br />
lines <strong>of</strong> evidence for a myeloid origin <strong>of</strong> DC derive from culture<br />
studies using GM-CSF. The aim <strong>of</strong> presented study was to<br />
develop in situ PCR for the detection <strong>of</strong> proviral DNA <strong>of</strong> BLV in<br />
DCs <strong>of</strong> naturally infected cattle. The results <strong>of</strong> provirus<br />
detection by in situ PCR were compared with those obtained<br />
using conventional PCR i.e. solution phase PCR<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Animals. Investigations were performed on the group <strong>of</strong> 9<br />
naturally infected with BLV leukaemic and 5 healthy cows.<br />
Samples. Blood samples, bone marrow, spleen and lymph<br />
nodes were examined in this experiment. Blood was collected,<br />
centrifuged in Histopaque gradient, density 1.077. Cells from<br />
interphase were collected and monocytes were separated with<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> magnetic microbeads labelled with MoAb CD14.<br />
Samples <strong>of</strong> lymphoid organs were cut, digested with<br />
collagenase-DNase, centrifuged and incubated with<br />
immunomagnetic microbeads coated with monoclonal<br />
antibody. Cells were passed through the magnetic sorter, the<br />
cells retendent on the magnet were eluted, washed and placed<br />
in cell culture for 2 weeks in RPMI in the presence <strong>of</strong> IL-4 and<br />
GM-CSF. Cells were grown in special labteks in incubator at<br />
37 o C in 5% <strong>of</strong> CO 2 . After that cells were washed, fixed and<br />
PCR in situ was performed in termocycler. Detection was<br />
performed with the use <strong>of</strong> anti-DIG peroxidase conjugate and<br />
AEC or alkaline phosphatase substrates.<br />
Immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence test (IF) and flow cytometry were<br />
performed with the use <strong>of</strong> MoAbs anti gp51 –BLV glycoprotein<br />
for determination <strong>of</strong> gp51 expression. Flow cytometry was<br />
used for determination <strong>of</strong> DCs immunophenotype in healthy<br />
and naturally infected with BLV cattle. Expression <strong>of</strong> cytokines:<br />
IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p40 and IL-12p70 was measured with<br />
commercial ELISA sets.<br />
Control. As positive control the foetal lamb kidney<br />
permanently infected with BLV - (FLK-BLV) cell line was used<br />
Results<br />
Generated from the blood and inner organs dendritic cells had<br />
typical shape, veils and processes. The expression <strong>of</strong> gp51<br />
glycoprotein was determined by flow cytometry.<br />
In dendritic cells infected with BLV we observed very high<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> determinants: CD11a, CD11b, CD11c and<br />
MHC-II class and very high expression <strong>of</strong> IL-6, IL-10. IL-12p40<br />
and IL-12p70 in culture fluids. Leukemic DCs exhibited DCs<br />
morphology and had a phenotype <strong>of</strong> mature DCs. The<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> gp51 glycoprotein <strong>of</strong> BLV on leukaemic DCs was<br />
detected in flow cytometry and immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence. The cells<br />
<strong>of</strong> samples with positive reaction in in situ PCR were dark<br />
brown stained. The negative controls were unstained. In situ<br />
PCR results agreed with those <strong>of</strong> provirus detection using<br />
conventional PCR and localization <strong>of</strong> proviral material in cells<br />
was visible.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> PCR in situ:<br />
DCs-blood DCs - spleen DCs bone marrow<br />
DCs – blood<br />
T<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> IF:<br />
DCs - spleen<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
In the present study, DCs generated from peripheral blood and<br />
different lymphoid tissues <strong>of</strong> cattle naturally infected with BLV,<br />
were examined for the presence <strong>of</strong> proviral DNA. In the first<br />
approach, called also direct in situ PCR, dNTP’s, labelled with<br />
digoxygenin, biotin or other markers, are incorporated into<br />
amplification products; the second approach involves two<br />
stage process which combines in situ PCR plus in situ<br />
hybridization with DNA probe. In our study we have used the<br />
first strategy and digoxigenin labelled dNTP’s. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />
gp51 expression was determined as well in IF as in flow<br />
cytometry. We obtained agreement in results <strong>of</strong> in situ PCR<br />
with results <strong>of</strong> other test. The DCs infected with BLV had more<br />
delicate morphology with many vacuoles in cytoplasm.<br />
Infection with BLV caused an increase in cytokines expression<br />
and changes in the percentage <strong>of</strong> surface molecules on<br />
dendritic cells. With the use <strong>of</strong> in situ PCR the localization <strong>of</strong><br />
proviral load could be detected.<br />
Application <strong>of</strong> in situ PCR would be recommended as a<br />
method to confirmation <strong>of</strong> infection with BLV.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The research was supported by the Polish State Committee for<br />
Scientific Research, grant No N N 308 622 138. The authors<br />
thank the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research for<br />
financial support.<br />
References<br />
1.Mirsky M.L., Olmstead C.A., Da Y., Lewin H.A. 1996: The prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> proviral bovine leukemia virus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells<br />
at two subclinical stages <strong>of</strong> infection. J Virol, 70, 2178-2183.<br />
2. Naif H.M., Brandon R.B., Daniel R.C.W., Lavin M.F. 1998: Bovine<br />
leukaemia proviral DNA detection in cattle using the polymerase chain<br />
reaction. Vet Microbiol, 1, 25, 117-129.<br />
3. Steinman R.M. 1991. The dendritic cell system and its role in<br />
immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 9, 271-296.<br />
4. Ballagi-Pordany A., Klintevall K., Merza M., Klingeborn B., Belak S.<br />
1992 : Direct detection <strong>of</strong> bovine leukemia virus infection: Practical<br />
applicability <strong>of</strong> a double polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Med B, 39,<br />
69-77.
S1 - P - 39<br />
BOVINE BLOOD DENDRITIC CELLS IN CATTLE INFECTED WITH BOVINE LEUKAEMIA VIRUS (BLV)<br />
Maria Szczotka, Jacek Kuźmak<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Biochemistry Department, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Bovine leukemia, dendritic cells, immunophenotype<br />
Introduction<br />
Dendritic cells (DCs) play an important role in the immune<br />
system. These cells are specialized in the presentation <strong>of</strong><br />
antigens. DCs are leukocytes derived from bone marrow and<br />
they are the only cells able to present antigen to naïve T cells.<br />
They initiate primary immune response, exist in all lymphoid and<br />
most non-lymphoid tissues and express both MHC class I and<br />
class II antigens. They not only have an enhancing effect on the<br />
acquired immunity development, but can induce tolerance and<br />
can be manipulated to prevent and treat allergic and autoimmune<br />
diseases. These cells are present in most tissues and comprise a<br />
small fraction <strong>of</strong> the leukocytes through the body, representing<br />
only about 1% <strong>of</strong> peripheral blood mononuclear cells. DCs are<br />
heterogenous cells that can be divided into the few functionalldistinct<br />
subsets on the basis <strong>of</strong> their phenotype, possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
migration and ability for cytokine production. They modulate both<br />
innate and adaptive immune response.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was the isolation <strong>of</strong> monocytes from bovine<br />
blood with the use <strong>of</strong> immunomagnetic beads coated with<br />
monoclonal antibody, generation <strong>of</strong> DCs and determination <strong>of</strong><br />
immunophenotype and cytokine expression.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Isolation <strong>of</strong> monocytes.<br />
Investigations were performed on a group <strong>of</strong> 9 cows naturally<br />
infected with BLV and 4 healthy, BLV-negative animals in ELISA<br />
and PCR that served as negative control. Peripheral blood<br />
mononuclear cells were isolated from whole blood treated with<br />
EDTA-K 2, by standard density centrifugation in Histopaque<br />
(density 1.077). The cells from interphase were collected,<br />
washed twice by centrifugation and incubated with<br />
immunomagnetic Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany), coated<br />
with monoclonal mouse anti-human CD14 antibody. After<br />
incubation, cells were centrifuged, cell pellet was resuspended in<br />
AutoMacs Rinsing Solution and placed on a magnetic column<br />
MACS LS (Miltenyi Biotec). The magnetically labelled CD14+<br />
cells were retained on the column and eluted after removal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
magnetic column from the magnet. The viability <strong>of</strong> the cells was<br />
assessed by trypan blue exclusion. The purity <strong>of</strong> the monocyte<br />
fraction was higher than 90%, determined by FACS analysis.<br />
Monocyte culture.<br />
Isolated monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium<br />
(containing FCS, glutamax and antibiotics) at 37 0 C in humidified<br />
5%CO 2 atmosphere, in the presence <strong>of</strong> granulocyte-macrophage<br />
colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and recombinant bovine<br />
interleukin- 4. The cells were fed every 3 day and cultivated for 7-<br />
10 days.during this period, the monocytes transformed into DCs.<br />
Cytology <strong>of</strong> DCs<br />
After 7-10 days, the cultured cells were dislodged by gentle<br />
pipetting, washed, cytocentrifuged onto slides, air-dried at room<br />
temperature and stained with Giemsa’s stain. Morphological<br />
observations were performed under the light microscope<br />
Olympus, equipped with computer system Lucia (Nikon).<br />
Ultrastructure <strong>of</strong> DCs was examined using scanning electron<br />
microscopy (SEM). Briefly, the cells were fixed in 2,5%<br />
glutaralaldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer, dehydrated in serially<br />
graded alcohols (70%-100%), and embedded. Ultrathin sections<br />
were cut, counterstained, and then observed under SEM.<br />
Immunophenotype <strong>of</strong> DCs in both groups <strong>of</strong> cows was<br />
determined in flow cytometer with the use <strong>of</strong> specific monoclonal<br />
antibodies for CD markers and fluorescent conjugates.<br />
Results<br />
In normal bovine blood, the number <strong>of</strong> monocytes was very low:<br />
1%-4%. After magnetic separation we obtained a fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
positively enriched (95%-97%) labelled cells. The CD14 positive<br />
cells had typical monocyte morphology with great nucleus and<br />
small cytoplasm. These cells cultured 24 h in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
GM-CSF and IL-4 in a growth medium transformed to the<br />
dendritic cells. Some <strong>of</strong> them were elongated and had dendritelike<br />
processes or edges. After 72 h, almost all cells had typical<br />
dendrites: some <strong>of</strong> them were divided on the end. DCs <strong>of</strong> infected<br />
cows cultured in vitro had very strong expression <strong>of</strong> CD11a,<br />
CD11b, CD11c, MHC-I and MHC-II. Expression <strong>of</strong> gp51<br />
glycoprotein was determined in BLV infected cows.by flow<br />
cytometry<br />
Tab.1. The immunophenotype <strong>of</strong> dendritic cells in leukaemic and<br />
control cattle (% cells – mean values)<br />
BLV(+)<br />
CD<br />
14<br />
CD<br />
11a<br />
CD<br />
11b<br />
CD<br />
11c<br />
MHC<br />
I<br />
MHC<br />
II<br />
gp5<br />
1<br />
1 week 83,6 42,5 89,5 58,4 84,6 17,0 5,6<br />
2 weeks 87,9 53,6 84,9 30,0 79,5 16,4 4,1<br />
3 weeks 92,7 63,2 95,7 31,6 77,5 20,5 5,4<br />
BLV (-)<br />
CD<br />
14<br />
CD<br />
11a<br />
CD<br />
11b<br />
CD<br />
11c<br />
MHC<br />
I<br />
MHC<br />
II<br />
1 week 49,4 38,8 67,3 26,5 80,4 20,5 -<br />
2 weeks 41,6 27,3 75,7 26,5 51,3 9,2 -<br />
3 weeks 88,4 23,4 72,2 11,2 28,9 10,5 -<br />
4 weeks 12,7 10,4 41,3 2,1 1,4 30,7 -<br />
gp5<br />
1<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The great amount <strong>of</strong> work performed in the recent years has led<br />
to the definition <strong>of</strong> DCs as cells identified by peculiar morphologic<br />
characteristics and specific functions, such as the ability to<br />
activate naive T cells. Very little is known about their origin and<br />
pathways <strong>of</strong> differentiation. Developing the immunogenic<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> DCs for vaccines – and what is very important for<br />
cancer therapy in humans – requires better access to this cell<br />
type. This report demonstrates that DCs can be derived from<br />
positively-selected monocytes in cattle. Large amounts <strong>of</strong> DCs<br />
can be obtained after the in vitro exposure <strong>of</strong> peripheral blood<br />
monocytes to the effects <strong>of</strong> cytokine combinations, mainly<br />
interleukin IL-4 and GM-CSF, but the ability <strong>of</strong> monocytes to<br />
convert to DCs in vivo has not been so far established. Although<br />
their origins are still controversial or remain unknown, myeloidderived<br />
and lymphoid-derived DCs lineages have been<br />
described. Through their ability to determine the differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />
either Th1 or Th2 cells, distinct DCs subsets may present<br />
antigens in vivo in an immunogenic or tolerogenic fashion. It is<br />
important that the immunostimulatory properties <strong>of</strong> DCs are<br />
dependent on their maturity state: immature DCs have been<br />
shown to be capable <strong>of</strong> inducing antigen-specific inhibition <strong>of</strong> in<br />
vivo T-cell function in humans. Moreover, DCs are potent to<br />
improve vaccine efficacy and are still being investigated as an<br />
important tool in cancer therapy. The availability <strong>of</strong> sufficient<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> efficient antigen-presenting DCs facilitates effective<br />
vaccine development and the study <strong>of</strong> T-cell-mediated responses<br />
to tumour-associated antigens and cancer therapy.<br />
References<br />
1.Banchereau, J, Steiman, R.1998, Dendritic cells and the control <strong>of</strong><br />
immunity. Nature, 392, 245-252<br />
2. Dubois, B, Fayette, J.1999. Dendritic cells directly modulate B cell<br />
growth and differentiation. J Leukoc Biol, 66, 224-230.<br />
3. Pinchuk LM, Boyd BL, Kruger EF. 2003. Bovine dendritic cells<br />
generated from monocytes and bone marrow progenitors regulate<br />
immunoglobulin production in peripheral blood B cells. Comp Immunol<br />
Microbiol Infect Dis, 26, 233-249.
S1 - P - 40<br />
PORCINE CIRCOVIRUS TYPE 2 IN POSTWEANING PIGS WITH ANTIBIOTIC NON-RESPONSIVE<br />
DIARRHEA<br />
Anna Szczotka 1 , Jacek Żmudzki 1 , Tomasz Stadejek 2 , Zygmunt Pejsak 1<br />
1<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Swine Diseases, Pulawy, Poland<br />
2<br />
Warsaw University <strong>of</strong> Life Sciences - SGGW, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics Warsaw, Poland<br />
Pigs, PCV2, diarrhea<br />
Introduction<br />
Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is a causative agent<br />
<strong>of</strong> postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). The<br />
diseases affects 5 – 15 weeks old pigs and is characterized by<br />
wasting, dyspnea, enlarged lymph nodes, pallor and jaundice.<br />
Sometimes diarrhoea could also be observed and this clinical<br />
manifestation should be differentiated from other swine enteric<br />
diseases, like proliferative enteropathy (PE ) and swine dysentery<br />
(SD). The etiological agents <strong>of</strong> these diseases are, respectively:<br />
Lawsonia intracellularis (L. Intracellularis) and Brachyspira<br />
hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae).<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to analyze the presence <strong>of</strong> porcine<br />
circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in cases <strong>of</strong> antibiotic non-responsive<br />
diarrhoea and to evaluate the possible role <strong>of</strong> the virus in<br />
development <strong>of</strong> enteritis in pigs. For differential diagnosis<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> L. Intracellularis and B. hyodysenteriae was<br />
performed.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Internal organs and feces were collected from 76 pigs, 5 – 19<br />
weeks old, from 50 farrow-to-finish farms, PMWS-positive or<br />
PMWS-suspected. Sections <strong>of</strong> lymph nodes and intestines<br />
(ileum, caecum and colon) were analyzed for presence <strong>of</strong> PCV2<br />
DNA by in situ hybridization test (ISH) (2). They were also<br />
hematoxilin-eosin (HE) stained for standard histopathological<br />
examination. Addtionally, fecal samples were tested for presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> B. hyodysenteriae and L. intracellularis by PCR (3).<br />
Results<br />
In samples from 37 pigs, 10 – 17 weeks old, large amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
PCV2 DNA, typical for PMWS, were detected in lymph nodes by<br />
ISH. In this group, in samples from 19 pigs, PCV2 was also found<br />
in abundant amount in samples <strong>of</strong> ileum. The remaining 18 pigs,<br />
PCV2-positive in lymph nodes, were negative in ileum. In<br />
samples from only 1 animal lymph nodes were negative for PCV2<br />
in ISH, but virus was detected in considerble amount in ileum. In<br />
HE stained sections <strong>of</strong> lymph nodes histopathological lesions<br />
characteristic for PMWS were identified. Similar lesions were<br />
observed in PCV2-positive samples <strong>of</strong> ileum. Seventy samples <strong>of</strong><br />
feces were negative in PCR for B. hyodysenteriae and<br />
L. intracellularis. DNA <strong>of</strong> L. intracellularis was found in feces from<br />
3 pigs and mixed infection caused by both bacteria was detected<br />
in 3 animals<br />
Figure 2: Presence <strong>of</strong> multinucleated giant cells (arrows) in<br />
mesenteric lymph node (left); multiple intracytoplasmic inclusion<br />
bodies in ileum (right). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE), 200x.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
According to the obtained results in PMWS-affected pigs similar<br />
lesions could be observed both in lymph nodes and in ileum and<br />
they correlate with clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> disease. Also, it was found<br />
that presence <strong>of</strong> PCV2 in ileum could be correlated with<br />
diarrhoea in PMWS- free animal, which confirms that the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> this virus as an intestinal pathogen may represent<br />
a new phenomenon (1). In the animals negative for<br />
B. hyodysenteriae and L. intracellularis and PCV2 other<br />
causative agents <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea should be considered.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This work was supported by the research grant N N308 075634<br />
from Polish Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and Higher Education<br />
References<br />
1. Jensen TK, Vigre H, Svensmark B, Bille-Hansen V (2006) Distinction<br />
between porcine circovirus type 2 enteritis and porcine proliferative<br />
enteropathy caused by Lawsonia intracellularis. J Comp Pathol 135: 176–<br />
182.<br />
2. Stadejek T., Podgórska K., Kołodziejczyk P., Bogusz R., Kozaczyński<br />
W., Pejsak Z. (2006) Pierwszy przypadek poodsadzeniowego<br />
wielonarządowego zespołu wyniszczającego świń w Polsce. Medycyna<br />
Wet., 62 (3), 297-301. [First report <strong>of</strong> postweaning multisystemic wasting<br />
syndrome in pigs in Poland].<br />
3. Żmudzki J, Osek J, Stankevicius A, Pejsak Z (2004) Rapid detection <strong>of</strong><br />
Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Lawsonia intracellularis in swine faecal<br />
and mucosal specimens by multiplex PCR. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 48: 207-<br />
214.<br />
Figure 1: Large amount <strong>of</strong> PCV2 antigen in inguinal superficial<br />
lymph node (left) and in ileum (right). In situ hybridization (ISH),<br />
200x.
Poster presentations<br />
“Diagnostics<br />
at the point <strong>of</strong> interest”<br />
(2 nd session)
S2 - P - 01<br />
EVALUATION OF FIELD BASED METHODS FOR DETECTION OF CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER BY PCR<br />
Ann-Sophie Ol<strong>of</strong>son 1 , Frederik Widén 1 , Neil Leblanc 1<br />
1<br />
SVA, VIP, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
Introduction<br />
Classical Swine Fever is a disease <strong>of</strong> high economical<br />
importance. Outbreaks in pigs can be extremely costly due to<br />
mortality, production losses and trade restrictions. In Europe this<br />
disease is circulating among wild boars. This virus reservoir<br />
constitutes an important risk for spill over to domestic pigs and<br />
therefore it is important to detect outbreaks among wild boars as<br />
early as possible. Field based PCR detection <strong>of</strong> CSFV <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> very early detection and is therefore an important<br />
tool for restricting and combating the outbreak.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Several different PCR instruments, like Cepheid Smartcycler,<br />
Corbett Rotorgene and Tetracore T4 etc. were compared for<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> CSFV using wet kit, dry kit and conventional<br />
reagents for PCR and several different filter papers, handheld<br />
magnetic comb and conventional methods for RNA extraction.<br />
Results<br />
Using the field based methods for extraction <strong>of</strong> RNA and field<br />
based PCR it was possible to detect CSFV with good sensitivity.<br />
Specific data will be presented.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results demonstrates that a truly field based detection <strong>of</strong><br />
CSFV can be accomplished using a battery driven PCR<br />
instrument an filter paper based extraction <strong>of</strong> RNA.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Thanks are due to Tetracore Inc, Rockville, USA for providing<br />
PCR instruments and reagents<br />
References<br />
1. ,Wakeley PR,Errington, J, Squirrell D.Use <strong>of</strong> a field-enabled extraction and<br />
PCR to detect BVDV. Veterinary Record 2010;166:238-239<br />
doi:10.1136/vr.b4783<br />
PCR, field based, penside, CSFV, Swine Fever
S2 - P - 02<br />
NEW IMMUNOASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ASFV BASED ON VP72: CAPTURE ELISA FOR<br />
DETECTION OF IGM SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND PEN-SIDE TEST FOR BLOOD SAMPLES.<br />
Teresa Perez 2 , Carmina Gallardo, 1 Angel Venteo 2 , Ana Ranz 2 , Raquel Nieto 1 , Ana Simon 1 , Paloma Rueda 2 ,<br />
Patricia Sastre, P 2 M Luisa Arias 1 , Antonio Sanz 2<br />
1 CISA-INIA, MADRID, SPAIN;<br />
2<br />
INGENASA, MADRID, SPAIN<br />
ASFV, PEN-SIDE TEST, diagnostic, IgM<br />
Introduction<br />
African swine fever (ASF) is a complex and lethal disease <strong>of</strong><br />
swine caused by a large double-stranded DNA virus belonging<br />
to the Asfaviridae family. The acute forms <strong>of</strong> the disease are<br />
devastating and result in very high mortality that may reach<br />
100% producing a major negative effect on national, regional<br />
and international trade. ASF it has been endemic in most <strong>of</strong><br />
sub-Saharan African countries and in Sardinia (Italy) until<br />
2007. In April 2007 its remarkable potential for trans-boundary<br />
spread was amply demonstrated appearing in the Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
Georgia with subsequent outbreaks to Armenia, Azerbaijan<br />
and Russia. Currently ASF is considered as being established<br />
in the Russia Federation threatens to other regions <strong>of</strong> Europe,<br />
central Asia and even China, which has the largest pig<br />
population in the world. Since there is no vaccine available,<br />
rapid and specific diagnostic procedures are an essential<br />
component in affected countries. The early appearance and<br />
subsequent long-term persistence <strong>of</strong> antibodies make antibody<br />
detection techniques a key factor in the control <strong>of</strong> the disease.<br />
To this end, INGENASA in collaboration with the European<br />
Union Reference Laboratory for ASF (CISA-INIA), have been<br />
working in the development an initial standardization <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Capture ELISA for detection <strong>of</strong> specific IgM. In addition has<br />
been improved a rapid, one-step immunochromatographic strip<br />
(pen-side test) INGEZIM PPA CROM for its applicability in the<br />
field to detect specific anti-ASF antibodies directly in blood<br />
specimens besides serum.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Although more studies are required for further validation, these<br />
preliminary results indicate that the p72 based IgM-capture-<br />
ELISA could be very useful tool for early detection <strong>of</strong> ASFV<br />
infection.<br />
In addition, the analyses <strong>of</strong> blood samples using the<br />
immunochromatographic assay INGEZIM PPA CROM allow us<br />
to detect specific antibodies against ASFV with appropriate<br />
values <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and specificity showing the capability <strong>of</strong><br />
the assay for rapid diagnosis <strong>of</strong> ASF in the field and where<br />
laboratory support and skilled personnel are limited.<br />
References<br />
1. Sánchez-Vizcaíno et al. Scientific report submitted to EFSA on<br />
African Swine Fever. (2009), 1-141.<br />
2. J. M. Sánchez-Vizcaíno et al. African Swine Fever: An<br />
Epidemiological Update. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, <strong>2012</strong><br />
(59), S1: 27–35.<br />
These studies have been made in collaboration with CISA-INIA<br />
(ASFRISK Project)<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Three different ASFV proteins were used as antigen for the<br />
IgM-ELISAs which comprised the fused p30-p15 protein, the<br />
p72 protein and the uncharacterized protein <strong>of</strong> 33kDa encodes<br />
by the K205R ORF. For initial standardization and validation <strong>of</strong><br />
the IgM-ELISAs, a panel <strong>of</strong> experimental serum samples was<br />
used. The samples were obtained from four independent<br />
experimental infections using the Kenyan ASF viruses<br />
belonging to genotype IX and X, the current East Europe<br />
circulating virus <strong>of</strong> genotype II and the attenuated and non<br />
haemadsorbing Portugal ASFV strain NH/P68 (NHV)<br />
belonging to p72 genotype I.<br />
To test the applicability <strong>of</strong> the immunochromatographic assay<br />
INGEZIM PPA CROM to detect antibodies in blood samples, in<br />
this study were included a wide panel <strong>of</strong> paired experimental<br />
and field porcine serum and blood samples available at CISA-<br />
INIA.<br />
The results were compared to those obtained using the OIE<br />
serological prescribed assays (OIE 2008) as gold standards.<br />
Results<br />
The results obtained in the initial standardization and validation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the IgM-ELISAs, showed that the new developed IgM<br />
capture ELISA, using p72 as antigen, detected specific IgM to<br />
ASFV at early times post infection. These positive samples<br />
remained negative using HT and K205R based IgM-ELISAs,<br />
as well as using the OIE prescribed serological assays.<br />
Results obtained with experimental infections using the<br />
attenuated and non haemadsorbing Portugal ASFV strain<br />
indicated that specific antibody response was detected on<br />
blood samples since day 6 p.i. using the<br />
immunochromatographic assay INGEZIM PPA CROM until the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the experiment. Same result was obtained using the<br />
OIE (Indirect ELISA) and INGENASA (Competition ELISA)<br />
conventional assays.
S2 - P - 03<br />
PORTABLE PLATFORMS FOR THE DETECTION OF AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS TESTED IN<br />
FIELD CONDITIONS IN NORTHERN UGANDA<br />
Neil LeBlanc 1 , Edward Okoth 2 , Mikhayil Hakhverdyan 1 , Charles Masembe 3 , Richard Bishop 2 ,<br />
Sándor Belák 1 , Karl Ståhl 1<br />
1 National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
2 International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya<br />
3 Makerere Univeristy, Kampala, Uganda<br />
African Swine Fever, Penside, Real-time PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a serious transboundary<br />
animal disease in Suidae, causing high rates <strong>of</strong> morbidity and<br />
mortality. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to produce a portable<br />
molecular platform lab that is suitable for use in the field or<br />
modestly equipped laboratories.<br />
In Southern and Eastern Africa, the presence <strong>of</strong> the sylvatic<br />
cycle involving wild Suidae and s<strong>of</strong>t ticks within the Ornithodoros<br />
family means that the risk <strong>of</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> ASFV into domestic<br />
swine is always present. However, ASFV can become<br />
established and maintained in domestic and wild pig populations<br />
for prolonged periods. In fact, due to low biosecurity, pig to pig<br />
transmission and contamination are considered the main factors<br />
in maintaining circulation <strong>of</strong> the virus. In Uganda, small pig<br />
holders form a key part <strong>of</strong> the food supply. The ability to detect<br />
ASFV at penside can be a key aspect in control <strong>of</strong> the disease<br />
and education <strong>of</strong> the pig owners to create an awareness <strong>of</strong><br />
biosecurity.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The T-COR 4 portable real-time PCR thermocycler was used for<br />
amplification and detection (Figure 1). In addition, materials for<br />
three methods <strong>of</strong> DNA extraction from whole blood were brought<br />
in for testing. They included a magnetic bead extraction method<br />
(Nordiag AB), FTA elute indicating cards, and Tego sample<br />
cards.<br />
The real-time PCR assay (ASFV UPL) employed was a new,<br />
recently published assay based on the universal probe library 1<br />
(Roche).The reagents used for the assay included the TaqMan<br />
Fast Advanced Master Mix, as this provided a robust mix that<br />
was thermostable to deal with field conditions. The primary field<br />
location was in an area near Koch Goma, Gulu District, Uganda;<br />
which had no electricity or running water. The laboratory was run<br />
three times over an eight day period, twice in Koch Goma and<br />
once in Kampala.<br />
Results<br />
The assay was tested in ASFV ring trials from two European<br />
projects (Epizone and ASFRISK) as well as another panel <strong>of</strong><br />
isolates representing all 22 genotypes <strong>of</strong> ASFV. They were also<br />
tested with the 2011 clinical ring trial samples prepared by the<br />
EURL. The assay performed well and is designed for ease <strong>of</strong> use<br />
in the field. The ASFV UPL assay was pre-mixed for use in the<br />
field, so assay preparation consisted <strong>of</strong> simply pipetting the mix<br />
into reaction tubes. The results indicate that platforms now can<br />
be established at pen-side or in field laboratories that perform at<br />
a level comparable to sophisticated molecular laboratories.<br />
Discussions & Conclusions<br />
The field trial revealed that these methods have potential for<br />
application in research and monitoring.<br />
Figure 1. Real-time PCR results from field site in Koch Goma,<br />
Uganda<br />
Extraction<br />
The magnetic bead extraction method appears to be robust and<br />
the most efficient. However, it involves a good deal <strong>of</strong> pipetting<br />
and various reagents. The Tego extraction is extremely simple<br />
and requires little time but sensitivity is lower. The FTA method<br />
also works well but there is significant drying time a 30 minute<br />
heating step, which means that although the method is simple, it<br />
does take some time. The sensitivity appears in between the two<br />
former methods.<br />
Assay<br />
The ASFV UPL assay worked was sensitive, reliable and robust.<br />
It is simple to use because it can be pre-mixed before going in<br />
the field.<br />
Instrument<br />
The TCOR 4 instruments functioned very well and managed to<br />
do several runs in a genuine field setting without fail. Re-charging<br />
the instruments by plugging into a vehicle outlet using a 12V<br />
universal adapter was effective in keeping the field lab functional<br />
while <strong>of</strong>f the grid for several days.<br />
Future<br />
Further efforts are now ongoing in collaboration with the<br />
International Livestock Research Institute in Kenya and Makerere<br />
University in Uganda. This includes another trial to facilitate the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> a portable ASFV platform in a major field study.<br />
References<br />
1. Fernández-Pinero, J, Gallardo, C, Elizalde, A et al. (<strong>2012</strong>). Molecular<br />
Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> African Swine Fever by a New Real-Time PCR Using<br />
Universal Probe Library. Transbound. and Emerg. Dis.,<br />
DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.<strong>2012</strong>.01317.x
Poster presentations<br />
“Emerging, re-emerging<br />
and wildlife diseases –<br />
diagnostic possibilities”<br />
(3 rd session)
S3 - P - 01<br />
BEAD-BASED SUSPENSION ARRAY FOR THE SIMULTANIOUS DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES<br />
AGAINS THE RIFT VALLEY FEVER VIRUS NUCLEOCAPSID AND GN GLYCOPROTEIN<br />
René Achterberg 1 , Fimme Jan van der Wal 1 , Matthijn de Boer 2 , Hani Boshra 3 , Alejandro Brun 3 , Kitty Maassen 1 ,<br />
Jeroen Kortekaas 1<br />
1 Central Veterinary Institute <strong>of</strong> Wageningen UR, Department <strong>of</strong> Bacteriology, Lelystad, The Netherlands<br />
2 Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Virology Division, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands<br />
3 Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), Carretera de Valdeolmos-El Casar s/n, Valdeolmos, Madrid, Spain<br />
Introduction<br />
Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a mosquito borne virus that was<br />
first isolated in 1930 in Kenya, and has since caused devastating<br />
outbreaks throughout Africa.<br />
The glycoprotein Gn and the nucleocapsid protein N were used<br />
to develop a Luminex assay for the simultaneous detection <strong>of</strong><br />
antibodies against these proteins.<br />
The resulting assay was evaluated using a well characterized<br />
panel <strong>of</strong> sera. The assay correctly identifies seropositive serum<br />
samples. In addition, results show that the assay may be used to<br />
differentiate infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) when new<br />
vaccines based on RVFV glycoproteins are were used.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Recombinant Gn and N proteins were coupled to Luminex<br />
paramagnetic MagPlex beads using standard coupling chemistry.<br />
The assay was evaluated using ring trial sera (1), field sera, and<br />
experimental sera from lambs vaccinated with a recombinant<br />
NDV virus expressing the RVFV Gn and Gc proteins (2).<br />
The sets include sera from sheep, cattle and humans and were<br />
tested using anti-species IgG and anti-species IgM.<br />
Results<br />
Ring trial (1) sera (57 sheep, 13 cattle) were defined ‘positive’ if<br />
at least one <strong>of</strong> the ELISAs in the ring trial gave a positive result at<br />
all participating laboratories. Most <strong>of</strong> the sera that scored positive<br />
in the ring trial scored positive in the Gn/N IgG Luminex assay.<br />
Sera that scored positive in the ring trial, but negative in the IgG<br />
Luminex assay, were found positive in the IgM Luminex assay.<br />
The results obtained from the field sera (11 ovine, 5 bovine and<br />
16 human) using the Gn/N IgG Luminex assay corresponded with<br />
data (unpublished) from an IgG ELISA.<br />
Animals, vaccinated with a Gn vaccine that lacks N, over time<br />
developed an IgG response exclusively against Gn, as<br />
demonstrated with the Gn/N IgG Luminex assay.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The RVFV Gn/N Luminex assay can be used for the<br />
simultaneous detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies against the RVFV Gn and N<br />
proteins in a single sample. The assay is capable <strong>of</strong> detecting<br />
IgG and IgM antibodies in multiple species and performs<br />
comparable to existing ELISAs. The results further show that the<br />
assay may be used as DIVA test to accompany glycoprotein<br />
based RVFV vaccines.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors would like to thank Catherine Cêtre-Sossah, Philippe<br />
Marianneau, Michel Pépin, Martin Eiden, Francesc Xavier Abad<br />
Morejón de Girón, Christiaan A. Potgieter and Shirley J. Smith for<br />
sera, Jan Wichers and Rob Moormann for helpful discussions.<br />
This research was funded by the Dutch Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.<br />
References<br />
1. Kortekaas et al., European ring trial to evaluate Rift Valley fever virus<br />
ELISAs, submitted<br />
2. Kortekaas, J., de Boer, S.M., Kant, J., Vloet, R.P., Antonis, A.F.,<br />
Moormann, R.J., 2010. Rift Valley fever virus immunity provided by a<br />
paramyxovirus vaccine vector. Vaccine 28, 4394-401<br />
RVFV, serology, Luminex, DIVA, suspension array
S3 - P - 02<br />
LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE-CAPTURE ELISA FOR THE DETECTION OF LEPTOSPIRA<br />
BORGPETERSENII SEROVAR HARDJO IN SHEEP<br />
Zbigniew Arent, Colm Gilmore, William Ellis<br />
OIE Leptospirosis Reference Laboratory, Veterinary Sciences Division, AFBI, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK<br />
Leptospira, leptospirosis, sheep, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
Endemic infection <strong>of</strong> sheep with Leptospira borgpetersenii<br />
serovar Hardjo (type Hardjo Bovis) is now recognised in many<br />
countries. Many authors demonstrated that infection in sheep is<br />
economically and clinically significant, particularly with regards to<br />
reproductive problems (1).This type <strong>of</strong> infection is <strong>of</strong>ten attributed<br />
to abortion, stillbirth, agalactia and death <strong>of</strong> weak newborn lambs.<br />
In addition, Hardjo infection is an occupational zoonosis <strong>of</strong> those<br />
who work with sheep. All the evidence points to sheep being an<br />
alternative maintenance host for this serovar. The efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
epidemiological or diagnostic studies <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis in sheep<br />
relies mainly on the correct identification <strong>of</strong> animals which have<br />
been exposed to infection. However, seroprevalence studies in<br />
sheep are difficult to interpret because the microscopic<br />
agglutination test (MAT) - standard serological test, detects only<br />
short-live immunological responses and many previously<br />
exposed and/or infected animals are seronegative. . Therefore<br />
there is a need for more sensitive test than the MAT as an<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> past exposure.<br />
Leptospiral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been identified as an<br />
immunodominant antigen, both in response to infection and to<br />
vaccination. It has proved useful for diagnosing previous<br />
exposure <strong>of</strong> cattle to Hardjo infection as it can be used to detect<br />
specific IgG antibodies to be suitable for diagnostic purposes as it<br />
is more specific and it may give some indication <strong>of</strong> the immune<br />
status <strong>of</strong> an animal.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was the development <strong>of</strong> antibody-capture<br />
ELISA using a monoclonal antibody directly against LPS epitope<br />
and its optimisation for use in sheep<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Plates were coated with monoclonal antibody against Leptospira<br />
borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo lipopolysaccharide produced and<br />
characterized earlier in our laboratory (2).<br />
Carbohydrate (CH) antigen was extracted from culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo type Bovis strains 0294<br />
using the hot-phenol–water method.<br />
Mouse monoclonal anti-ovine IgG antibodies prepared earlier in<br />
our laboratory were used to prepared conjugate. The monoclonal<br />
Ig’s were purified on a Protein G column and covalently attached<br />
to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) using periodate oxidation<br />
method. TMB substrate was used as colorimetric indicator.<br />
After reading the plate at 405 nm results were normalized by<br />
expressing the corrected optical density (Serum OD – Negative<br />
Control OD) as the percentage <strong>of</strong> positivity (%P) <strong>of</strong> the positive<br />
control serum. The optimal cut-<strong>of</strong>f value for the ELISA was<br />
determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.<br />
Correlation between MAT and ELISA was evaluated using 560<br />
field sheep serum samples<br />
Results<br />
A cut-<strong>of</strong>f point was calculated using 80 serum samples obtained<br />
from flocks with no history <strong>of</strong> Leptospirosis and which had no<br />
serological evidence <strong>of</strong> exposure to serovar Hardjo and 60<br />
Hardjo MAT-positive sheep sera. The ROC analysis estimated<br />
the optimized ELISA cut-<strong>of</strong>f as %P ≥ 4.5, with corresponding<br />
diagnostic sensitivity at 95% (95% Cl: 86.1 - 99.0) and specificity<br />
at 98.75% (95% Cl: 93.2 - 100.0) (Fig1).<br />
Sensitivity (%)<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Fig 1 ROC curve analysis<br />
0<br />
cut-<strong>of</strong>f value: >4.5<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
100-Specificity (%)<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> positive results obtained by ELISA test and<br />
MAT applied to field sera are presented in Tab. 1. In the MAT,<br />
reactions to serovar Hardjo were with 28 ovine sera (5.0%)<br />
reacting at 1/100 or greater. When using ELISA, 82 (14.6%) <strong>of</strong><br />
the sera were positive. Only 5 (0.9%) sera were positive in MAT<br />
and negative in ELISA test.<br />
Tab. 1 Comparison <strong>of</strong> ELISA and MAT results<br />
ELISA<br />
Positive<br />
ELISA<br />
Negative<br />
MAT<br />
≥ 1:100<br />
MAT<br />
Negative<br />
TOTAL<br />
for ELISA<br />
14.6% 85.4%<br />
TOTAL<br />
for MAT<br />
4.6% 0.4% 5.0%<br />
10.0% 85.0% 95.0%<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the study demonstrated that the ELISA was more<br />
sensitive than MAT. The differences in correlation between the<br />
MAT and ELISA tests was to be expected since the tests<br />
measure different classes <strong>of</strong> antibody. The MAT detects both IgG<br />
and IgM antibodies whereas the ELISA used in this study detects<br />
only IgG. This shows that our ELISA has some limitation<br />
especially as an individual animal test, but despite this, the higher<br />
sensitivity, when compared with the MAT indicates obvious<br />
advantages in use <strong>of</strong> the ELISA as a flock test, where the aim is<br />
to estimate exposure and immunity levels in the flock. The<br />
ELISA seems to be a valuable complement to serological<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis but cannot replace MAT, which<br />
represents the gold standard.<br />
Advantages <strong>of</strong> LPS-captured ELISA test:<br />
- Leptospira Hardjo specific<br />
- Better indicator <strong>of</strong> past exposure than MAT<br />
- Safe and easy to use<br />
- Suitable for screening large numbers <strong>of</strong> sera<br />
References<br />
1. Ellis et al. (1983) Possible involvement <strong>of</strong> leptospires in abortion,<br />
stillbirths and neonatal deaths in sheep. Vet Rec 26, 291-293.<br />
2. Yan K.-T. et al. 1999. Development <strong>of</strong> an ELISA to detect antibodies to<br />
a protective lipopolysaccharide fraction <strong>of</strong> Leptospira borgpetersenii<br />
serovar hardjo in cattle. Vet Microbiol 69, 173-187.
S3 - P - 03<br />
EVALUATION OF DIRECT BLOOD POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR RAPID DETECTION OF<br />
AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS<br />
Claudia Gabriel 1 , Marianna Khachatryan 1 , Immanuel Leifer 1,2 , Sandra Blome 1 , Johanna Zemke 1 ,<br />
Bernd H<strong>of</strong>fmann 1 , Martin Beer 1<br />
1<br />
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Virology, Greifswald – Insel Riems, Germany<br />
2<br />
Present address: Institute <strong>of</strong> Virology and Immunoprophylaxis, Mittelhaeusern, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
Most polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> African swine fever virus (ASFV) require labourintensive<br />
and expensive DNA extraction steps. Nowadays, PCR<br />
kits are available that allow PCR directly from blood samples.<br />
Here, we report on the evaluation <strong>of</strong> such kits in combination with<br />
routine primers.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
In the initial phase <strong>of</strong> the study, two direct PCR kits were<br />
assessed using positive EDTA blood samples obtained from<br />
animals experimentally infected with a highly virulent ASFV<br />
isolate from Armenia: A) the Phusion® Blood Direct PCR Kit<br />
(Finnzymes Oy, Vantaa, Finland; now Thermo Fisher Scientific,<br />
Waltham, USA) and B) the KAPA Blood PCR Master Mix<br />
(PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). For<br />
specific detection <strong>of</strong> ASFV, primers published by King et al.<br />
(2003) were used.<br />
Both test kits were optimised for gel-based PCR regarding<br />
sample volume and temperature pr<strong>of</strong>ile referring to the<br />
manufacturer’s recommendations. Subsequently, the direct PCR<br />
Kits were tested with negative samples, positive samples from<br />
animal trials, and dilution series <strong>of</strong> positive samples in<br />
comparison with the routinely used real-time PCR assay.<br />
Results<br />
After preliminary optimisation, ASFV was reliably detected in<br />
blood samples from experimentally infected pigs. Both with these<br />
experimental samples and dilution series <strong>of</strong> positive samples, the<br />
direct PCR proved to be as sensitive as established real-time<br />
PCR protocols.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Concluding, this assay is favourable in both economical and<br />
technological terms and allows the analysis <strong>of</strong> very small sample<br />
volumes. Moreover, direct blood PCR could be advantageous for<br />
pen-side diagnostic applications.<br />
References<br />
1. King DP, Reid SM, Hutchings GH, Grierson SS, Wilkinson PJ, Dixon LK,<br />
Bastos AD, Drew TW. (2003). Development <strong>of</strong> a TaqMan PCR assay with<br />
internal amplification control for the detection <strong>of</strong> African swine fever virus. J<br />
Virol Methods, 107(1):53-61<br />
African swine fever virus, Diagnosis, Direct PCR
S3 - P - 04<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS ANTIBODY ELISA<br />
Christian Schelp 1 , Yann Senechal 1 , San Pun 1 , Daniel Schumacher 1 , Dragos Gradinaru 2 , Christoph Egli 1 , Jean-<br />
Luc Troch 1 , John Lawrence 3 , Serge Leterme 3<br />
Introduction<br />
Schmallenberg virus was first identified in Germany in late 2011<br />
as a new Orthobunyavirus genetically highly similar to viruses <strong>of</strong><br />
the Simbu serogroup. The virus infects ruminants such as cattle,<br />
sheep and goats. Schmallenberg virus infections have been<br />
recently confirmed in several European countries including<br />
Germany 1 , The Netherlands, Belgium, France, United Kingdom,<br />
Luxembourg, Italy and Spain. Clinical signs include reduced milk<br />
yields, fever, diarrhea, abortions and malformed newborns. Virus<br />
detection by real time RT-PCR or virus cultivation is not the<br />
method <strong>of</strong> choice for infection monitoring due to the very short<br />
viremic period. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an antibody<br />
ELISA to identify infected animals.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Hundreds <strong>of</strong> samples originating from clinically affected herds,<br />
from virus positive animals and from areas with no<br />
Orthobunyavirus presence are being collected. Samples will be<br />
further characterized by using an inhouse immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence<br />
assay, PCR and epidemiological and clinical data.<br />
An antibody ELISA will be described. Microtiter plates will be<br />
coated with inactivated Schmallenberg-virus antigen. Binding <strong>of</strong><br />
Schmallenbergvirus antibodies will be visualized by colour<br />
change in the wells <strong>of</strong> the microtiter plate. The diagnostic<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> the result will be assessed by comparing the optical<br />
density (OD) <strong>of</strong> the samples with the OD <strong>of</strong> the positive control.<br />
Results<br />
Preliminary data will be presented. Specificity and sensitivity data<br />
will be calculated using characterized samples. The data will<br />
allow for setting a cut-<strong>of</strong>f to identify Schmallenbergvirus antibody<br />
positive and negative samples.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The data will be discussed and conclusions will be proposed<br />
according to obtained antibody test performance.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We kindly acknowledge the collaboration with the FLI (Friedrich-<br />
Loeffler-Institut), Insel Riems, Germany.<br />
We also would like to thank for the assistance by various<br />
institutes and veterinarians across Europe in helping to collect<br />
samples and additional data.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, B, Scheuch, M, Höper, D, Jungblut, R, Holsteg, M,<br />
Schirrmeier, H, Eschbaumer, M, Goller, K.V., Wernike, K, Fischer, M,<br />
Breithaupt, A, Mettenleiter, T.C., Beer, M (<strong>2012</strong>). Novel Orthobunyavirus in<br />
Cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, 469-472<br />
1<br />
IDEXX Switzerland AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland<br />
2 IDEXX Montpellier SA, Montpellier, France<br />
IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, USA 3<br />
Schmallenberg virus, antibody ELISA, Orthobunyavirus
S3 - P - 05<br />
DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS MULTILOCULARIS IN FOXES’ FAECES BY PCR WITH THE USE OF<br />
DILUTED DNA SAMPLES – COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF DNA ISOLATION<br />
Jacek Karamon, Jacek Sroka, Tomasz Cencek<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Disease, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Key words: Echinococcus multiloculais, PCR, copro-DNA, inhibitors, foxes<br />
Introduction<br />
Echinococcus multioloculais infection is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
dangerous zoonoses and still remains a significant public health<br />
problem. Definitive hosts <strong>of</strong> this tapeworms are carnivores<br />
(especially foxes, but also dogs) which disperse the invasive<br />
eggs with faeces. A lot <strong>of</strong> prevalence study are conducted in<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> foxes and dogs, in order to estimate the infection<br />
risk for people. In wild carnivires post mortem examinations <strong>of</strong><br />
intestines are recommended - among them the SCT – regarded<br />
as the “gold standard”. But there are many situations when<br />
investigation must be carried out in vivo (for example examination<br />
<strong>of</strong> dogs populations). Therefore there are some techniques for<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Echinococcus infection in definitive hosts by feaces<br />
examination and among them PCR for copro-DNA detection is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the most usefull and sensitive. However, there are many<br />
problems connected with PCR inhibiting factors contained in<br />
faeces. The aim <strong>of</strong> this investigation was to compare the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> different methods <strong>of</strong> E. multilocularis DNA<br />
isolation from faeces for PCR performed with different DNA<br />
dillutions - to choose the variant minimizing the inhibiting influent<br />
<strong>of</strong> faeces.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Intestines (small and large) used in investigation were obtained<br />
from 35 foxes. Small intestines were examined by sedimentation<br />
and counting technique (SCT). Samples <strong>of</strong> faeces (about 2 g)<br />
collected from the end <strong>of</strong> rectum were frozen (-20 o C) for<br />
molecular examination.,<br />
DNA from samples were isolated and purified with the use <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
different methods:<br />
(L)– with the use <strong>of</strong> QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen)<br />
according to protocol for larger volumes <strong>of</strong> stool (1g samples<br />
were used)<br />
(S)– with the use <strong>of</strong> QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen)<br />
according to standard protocol for (200 mg samples were used)<br />
(T)- with the use <strong>of</strong> QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to<br />
standard producer protocol (20 mg samples were used)<br />
DNA isolated in each method were tested by PCR in 6 variants:.<br />
one not diluted (1/1) and 5 diluted (1/2.5, 1/5, 1/10. 1/20, 1/40)<br />
A nested PCR method was used, as described by Dinkel et al.<br />
(1998) with some modifications concerning reaction mixture and<br />
time conditions <strong>of</strong> amplification (Karamon et al <strong>2012</strong>). The<br />
sequence for amplification was part <strong>of</strong> the E. multilocularis<br />
mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. In a second stage <strong>of</strong> PCR the<br />
fragment specific for E. multilocularis (250 bp) was amplified.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> 25 foxes additional faecal samples were collected and<br />
examinmed at once for detection od Taenidae eggs by McMaster<br />
flotatuion technique.<br />
Fig. 1. Percentage <strong>of</strong> E. multilocularis positive samples detected<br />
by SCT and PCR (3 variants <strong>of</strong> DNA isolation) and Taenidae<br />
positive samples found by flotation.<br />
.<br />
% <strong>of</strong> positive samples<br />
60,0<br />
50,0<br />
40,0<br />
30,0<br />
20,0<br />
10,0<br />
0,0<br />
51,4<br />
45,7<br />
40,0<br />
34,3<br />
20,0<br />
SCT PCR L PCR S PCR T Flotation<br />
(Taenidae<br />
eggs)<br />
Results<br />
E. multilocularis tapeworms were found in 18 from 35 (51,4%)<br />
intestines examined by SCT. The intensity was ranged from 2 to<br />
1055 worms per intestine.<br />
The highest number <strong>of</strong> positive results in PCR (16) were obtained<br />
in isolation variant (L) (isolation with the use <strong>of</strong> larger stool<br />
volume), and then 14 and 12 respectively for (S) and (T) variants<br />
<strong>of</strong> isolation. In one case (sample No. 19) sample negative in<br />
SCT was estimated as positive in PCR (L).<br />
In some samples positive results in PCR were obtained only in<br />
diluted DNA. From 25 faeces examined by flotation only in 5<br />
(20%) Taenidae eggs were detected<br />
Table 1. Selected results obtained by PCR for detection <strong>of</strong> E.<br />
multilocularis copro-DNA (in different DNA dilution and with the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> 3 different variants <strong>of</strong> DNA isolation) in comparison to<br />
microscopic sedimentation and counting technique (SCT).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Blocking <strong>of</strong> PCR by inhibitors contained in faeces is the known<br />
problem in molecular diagnostics. When the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
inhibiting substances in the sample is high, the elimination <strong>of</strong><br />
them during DNA purification (also by using dedicated methods)<br />
may be insufficient In that cases significant amount <strong>of</strong> them leave<br />
in the DNA sample and can block the PCR - causing possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
false negative results. Some authors demonstrated that samples<br />
which block the PCR may be identified by repeated examination<br />
<strong>of</strong> all negative ones with adding to each one additional positive<br />
control (Dinkel et al 1998). But in such method all identified<br />
inhibiting samples had to be eliminated from further analysis at<br />
all, because there were still no answer which ones were really<br />
positive or negative.<br />
However, our investigation showed that in E. multilocularis PCR<br />
additional using diluted DNA (besides non diluted) could avoid<br />
false negative results causing by PCR inhibition. In the (L)<br />
method <strong>of</strong> purification using additionally 1/10 dilution <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />
seems to be enough. But, when DNA purification was done by<br />
the method not dedicated for faeces, DNA samples required<br />
more and higher dilutions (because <strong>of</strong> higher inhibitors<br />
concentration).<br />
References<br />
1. Dinkel, A. et al Echinococcus multilocularis in the definite host,<br />
coprodiagnosis by PCR is an alternative to necropsy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36,<br />
1871–1876 (1998)<br />
2. Karamon et al. The first detection <strong>of</strong> Echinococcus multilocularis in<br />
slaughtered pigs in Poland. Vet Parasitol 185 327– 329 (<strong>2012</strong>)
S3 - P - 06<br />
COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND PCR FOR DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SSP.<br />
PARATUBERCULOSIS IN BOVINE FAECES<br />
Selina Keller 1 , Nicole Cernela 2 , Roger Stephan 2 , Max M. Wittenbrink 1<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Zurich, Switzerland<br />
2<br />
Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Zurich, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
Paratuberculosis is an incurable granulomatous enteropathy<br />
caused by Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP)<br />
affecting primarily wild and domestic ruminants with animals up to<br />
six months <strong>of</strong> age being most receptive (1). Common route <strong>of</strong><br />
infection is faecal-oral with faeces or milk and incubation time<br />
ranges from months to years. Together with the late onset <strong>of</strong><br />
symptoms, this makes diagnosis <strong>of</strong> paratuberculosis very<br />
challenging. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to compare a direct real<br />
time PCR with a cultural approach for screening faecal samples<br />
<strong>of</strong> healthy animals from different farms with a history <strong>of</strong><br />
paratuberculosis.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
This study comprised faecal samples <strong>of</strong> 1266 animals from 13<br />
dairy cattle and 10 sucking cow herds. In these herds at least one<br />
animal had been diagnosed with paratuberculosis in the last 5<br />
years. Herd sizes ranged from 11 to 130 animals.<br />
Paratuberculosis, culture, PCR, cattle<br />
Culture and PCR were performed from three pooled faecal<br />
samples at a time (2). For culture, a decontamination with 4%<br />
NaOH and 5% oxalic acid was used to reduce the accompanying<br />
bacterial flora before the 422 faecal pools were transferred onto<br />
selective media containing Mycobactin J, namely Löwenstein-<br />
Jensen (LJ) and Herrold’s Egg Yolk agar (HEYA) (3). Suspicious<br />
colonies were inoculated into Middlebrook 7H9 broth enriched<br />
with ADC and Mycobactin J (4). After one week <strong>of</strong> multiplication,<br />
Ziehl-Neelsen staining was performed for detection <strong>of</strong> acid fast<br />
bacilli. For confirmation <strong>of</strong> MAP, real time PCR based on the F57<br />
element was used (5). Moreover, for direct detection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pathogen in pooled faecal samples, the same real time PCR<br />
protocol was performed.<br />
Results<br />
After incubation for 16 weeks, in 62 <strong>of</strong> the 422 (14.7%) faecal<br />
pools cultivation <strong>of</strong> MAP succeeded (Figure 1), <strong>of</strong> which 48<br />
(77.4%) grew on HEYA, 2 (3.2%) on LJ and 12 (19.6%) grew<br />
both on LJ and HEYA (Figure 2). However, only 9 <strong>of</strong> 422 (2.1%)<br />
faecal pools tested positive by direct real time PCR. In general,<br />
HEYA revealed positive cultures already after 9 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation, whereas 11 weeks were necessary for visible growth<br />
on LJ.<br />
For identification <strong>of</strong> the MAP spreading animals, samples (n=186)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 62 positive tested pools were individually subjected to<br />
culture and PCR. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> MAP succeeded in 59 <strong>of</strong> the 186<br />
(31.6%) faecal samples, whereas only 12 <strong>of</strong> 186 (6.4%) tested<br />
positive by direct real time PCR.<br />
Figure 2: Growth <strong>of</strong> MAP on HEYA and LJ<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this study show that for MAP detection in faecal<br />
samples from animals without clinical signs, the cultural assay is<br />
a more sensitive method compared to F57 real time PCR.<br />
Nevertheless, considering the long cultivation time and the workintensive<br />
procedure, the applicability in view <strong>of</strong> eradication<br />
systems remains restricted. The limited performance <strong>of</strong> PCR,<br />
however, may be due to the fact that in the cultural assay 1244-<br />
times more faecal material is used. Results from this study also<br />
highlight the impact <strong>of</strong> the medium chosen for cultivation since<br />
HEYA revealed a much higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> MAP compared to<br />
LJ.<br />
References<br />
1. Bögli-Stuber, K., et al. (2005): Detection <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium avium<br />
subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss dairy cattle by real-time PCR and<br />
culture: a comparison <strong>of</strong> the two assays,<br />
J Appl. Microbiol. 99:587–597.<br />
2. Kalis, C.H.J., et al. (2000): Culture <strong>of</strong> strategically pooled bovine fecal<br />
samples as a method to screen herds for paratuberculosis, Vet. Diagn.<br />
Invest. 12:547–551.<br />
3. Beerwerth, W. (1967): Die Züchtung von Mykobakterien aus dem Kot<br />
der Haustiere und ihre Bedeutung für die Epidemiologie und Bekämpfung<br />
der Tuberkulose, Prax. Pneumol. 21:189–202.<br />
4. Glanemann, B., et al. (2004): Detection <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium avium<br />
subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss dairy cattle by culture and serology,<br />
Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk., 146:409-415.<br />
5. Bosshard, C., et al. (2006): Application <strong>of</strong> an F57 sequence-based realtime<br />
PCR assay for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis detection in bulk tank<br />
raw milk and slaughtered healthy dairy cows, J Food Prot. 69:1662-7.<br />
Figure 1: MAP detection in faecal pools by PCR and culture.
S3 - P - 07<br />
HEPATITIS E VIRUS IN DOMESTIC SWINE AND WILD BOAR FROM GERMANY<br />
Oliveira-Filho, E.F, Bank-Wolf, B.R., Thiel, H-J., König, M.<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Virology, Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Schubertstr. 81, 35392 Gießen<br />
Introduction<br />
Hepatitis E is an emerging zoonotic disease distributed<br />
worldwide. The causative agent Hepatitis E virus (HEV)<br />
belongs to the genus Hepevirus <strong>of</strong> the virus family<br />
Hepeviridae. Another member <strong>of</strong> the family not assigned to a<br />
genus so far is the avian HEV.<br />
HEV is non-enveloped with a single stranded RNA genome <strong>of</strong><br />
positive polarity. The genome encompassing approximately<br />
7.2 kb encodes three open reading frames. Members <strong>of</strong> HEV<br />
can be subdivided into at least 4 genotypes (1-4). Virus<br />
isolates from rats and rabbits may belong to additional new<br />
genotypes.<br />
HEV may cause acute hepatitis in humans but infection <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
remains subclinical. Besides man HEV was also found in<br />
domestic animals such as swine as well as in wildlife species<br />
like wild boar, deer, rabbit and rat. So far, no clinical disease<br />
has been associated with HEV infection in these animals.<br />
In this study we intended to investigate the presence <strong>of</strong> HEV in<br />
wild boar and domestic swine in Germany. Phylogenetic<br />
analyses were performed to form the basis for molecular<br />
epidemiology and the improvement <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 105 porcine faecal samples and 124 sera from wild<br />
boar were tested by conventional RT-PCR using different<br />
primer combinations. In addition a quantitative real time PCR<br />
(qPCR) test for HEV was set up.<br />
PCR amlicons were cloned and nucleic acid sequences<br />
obtained and compared to sequence data from GenBank.<br />
Phylogenetic analyses using partial as well as complete<br />
sequences <strong>of</strong> the HEV capsid gene were performed.<br />
Results<br />
A fragment <strong>of</strong> 241 nucleotides was detected in 13.7% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sera from wild boar and in a single faecal sample from a<br />
domestic swine (0.95%). All viruses could be assigned to<br />
genotype 3 <strong>of</strong> HEV. Sequence diversity was significant with<br />
differences <strong>of</strong> up to 21.6% among the wild boar samples.<br />
The complete capsid protein gene was cloned and sequenced<br />
from three wild boar samples and the single positive domestic<br />
swine. Based on this sequence data the isolate from domestic<br />
swine was assigned to HEV subtype 3a and the three wild<br />
boar viruses to subtypes 3a and 3i.<br />
Additional analyses indicated recombination between<br />
members <strong>of</strong> HEV subtypes as one reason for sequence<br />
diversity.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our study indicates that HEV is circulating among wild boar in<br />
Germany and may be transferred to domestic swine. These<br />
data support observations by others (1, 2).<br />
The close relationship <strong>of</strong> the animal and human HEV<br />
sequences implies the risk for zoonotic transmission <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus. Phylogenetic analyses should be based on complete<br />
capsid gene sequences to allow a significant separation <strong>of</strong><br />
subtypes.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Samples from wild boar were kindly provided by Landesbetrieb<br />
Hessisches Landeslabor Giessen.<br />
References<br />
1. Schielke, A, Sachs, K, Lierz, M, Appel, B, Jansen, A, Johne, R<br />
(2009). Detection <strong>of</strong> hepatitis E virus in wild boars <strong>of</strong> rural and urban<br />
regions in Germany and whole genome characterization <strong>of</strong> an endemic<br />
strain. Virol J. 14;6:58.<br />
2. Wenzel JJ, Preiss J, Schemmerer M, Huber B, Plentz A, Jilg W.<br />
(2011). Detection <strong>of</strong> hepatitis E virus (HEV) from porcine livers in<br />
Southeastern Germany and high sequence homology to human HEV<br />
isolates. J Clin Virol. 52(1):50-4.<br />
HEV, zoonosis, wild boar, phylogenetic analysis
S3 - P - 08<br />
EMERGENCE OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS:<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR DETECTION KIT<br />
Damien MAGNEE 1 , Stéphane DALY 1 , Sandrine MOINE 1 , Eric SELLAL 1<br />
1<br />
LSI Laboratoire Service International, LISSIEU, France<br />
Schmallenberg, Real-Time PCR, Outbreak,<br />
Introduction<br />
Between August and December 2011, outbreaks <strong>of</strong> disease in<br />
adult cattle, abortions and births <strong>of</strong> malformed animals in sheep,<br />
cattle and goats were reported in the Netherlands, Germany and<br />
Belgium. A new virus was identified as a cause <strong>of</strong> these problems<br />
and was named “Schmallenberg virus” after the place where it<br />
was first identified.<br />
This virus belongs to the Bunyaviridae family, genus<br />
orthobunyaviridae and is closely related to Akabane, Aino and<br />
Shamonda viruses. Preliminary studies have suggested that this<br />
virus affects mainly ruminants and must be transmitted by a<br />
vector (biting midges <strong>of</strong> the genus Culicoides, mosquitoes...).<br />
We present here the development <strong>of</strong> new real-time PCR kits for<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus, by targeting the S segment,<br />
and the different validation steps leading to final authorisation for<br />
SBV diagnosis by the French National Reference Laboratory<br />
(ANSES Maisons-Alfort) and by the Friedrich-Loeffler-Insitut in<br />
Germany.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Systems for specific detection <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg Virus were<br />
designed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the sequence deposited on Genbank. A<br />
first system was designed on the L segment. Then, according to<br />
the FLI recommendations, we realised a new design, based on<br />
the detection <strong>of</strong> the S segment. The LSI SBVS kit allows the<br />
simultaneous detection <strong>of</strong> SBV target and an endogenous IPC.<br />
Detectability <strong>of</strong> the both kits was compared with the FLI design<br />
using serial dilution <strong>of</strong> SBV RNAs provided by the Friedrich-<br />
Loeffler Institut (Germany). Analytical specificity and sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
L and S segment kit were assessed using several field samples<br />
(brains), coming from France and Belgium.<br />
Specificity <strong>of</strong> prototype kits was evaluated on a panel <strong>of</strong> ruminant<br />
pathogens and other orthobunyaviridae.<br />
Both prototype kits were sent to the Friedrich Loeffler Institut and<br />
the S segment prototype kit was sent to the French NRL<br />
(ANSES-Maisons Alfort) for evaluation <strong>of</strong> their specificity,<br />
sensitivity, detectability and repeatability on field samples, in<br />
order to receive <strong>of</strong>ficial validation for diagnosis in France and<br />
Europe.<br />
SBV virus detection is preferably performed on brains <strong>of</strong> aborted<br />
fetus, but the virus can also be located in blood, serum and<br />
spleen. For brain and spleen samples, a grinding step is<br />
necessary.<br />
Results<br />
The both systems showed good specificity, with detection <strong>of</strong> all<br />
positive samples and no detection <strong>of</strong> other ruminant pathogens.<br />
These kits have equivalent detectability with the FLI designs, with<br />
better sensitivity for the S segment relative to the L segment (for<br />
FLI and LSI design).<br />
On 34 field samples (brains coming from stillbirths with<br />
malformations), we have better detectability with LSI systems,<br />
with 29 positives samples with LSI S segment PCR and 25<br />
positives with FLI PCR.<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the both kits obtained at LSI were confirmed at<br />
the French NRL and the Friedrich Loeffler Institut. Kits showed<br />
good sensitivity, specificity and detectability (Table 1).<br />
Table 1: Official evaluation <strong>of</strong> LSI SBV Segment S kit<br />
Sensitivity<br />
and<br />
specificity<br />
Detectability<br />
ANSES (France)<br />
37 samples with<br />
100% correlation<br />
2 negatives samples<br />
with FLI system are<br />
positive with LSI kit<br />
Gain <strong>of</strong> 1 log<br />
FLI (Germany)<br />
40 field samples<br />
with 100%<br />
correlation<br />
100% correlation<br />
with FLI system<br />
The SBV-S segment kit commercialised by LSI received <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
authorisation for utilisation in the French network for diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
Schmallenberg virus and was also validated by the FLI, for use in<br />
European market.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
We showed here all the steps leading to <strong>of</strong>ficial validation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
SBV LSI kit in Real-Time rt-PCR, by the French National<br />
Reference Laboratory and the Friedrich Loeffler Institut.<br />
The first step was to develop a PCR kit, targeting the L segment,<br />
with exogenous IPC. After recommendation by the FLI to target<br />
preferably the S segment and request <strong>of</strong> the French NRL to use<br />
an endogenous IPC, we develop a second kit with segment S<br />
detection, with endogenous IPC.<br />
The initial validation at LSI shows good results in sensitivity,<br />
specificity and detectability. A panel <strong>of</strong> 34 field samples show<br />
good results, for SBV target and for IPC (figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Results on field samples for SBV-S LSI kit<br />
All characteristics obtained at LSI were confirmed at the French<br />
NRL and at the FLI, giving to this kit an <strong>of</strong>ficial authorisation for<br />
use in SBV diagnosis in France and Europe.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
A special thank to the French NRL (ANSES Maisons-Alfort) and<br />
Bernd H<strong>of</strong>fmann (FLI) for their scientific expertise and their help,<br />
in this particular context.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, B, Scheuch, M (<strong>2012</strong>). Novel Orthobunyavirus in Cattle,<br />
Europe, 2011. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Vol 18 N° 3, p1-<br />
6
S3 - P - 09<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF A SOLID- PHASE COMPETITIVE ELISA FOR THE DETECTION OF<br />
ANTIBODIES AGAINST WEST NILE DISEASE VIRUS IN HORSE SERA<br />
G. L. Autorino 1 , A. Caprioli 1 , F. De Simone 2 , R. Frontoso 1 , D. Lelli 2 , R. Nardini 1 , F. Rosone 1 , M. T. Scicluna 1 .<br />
1<br />
National Reference Centre for Equine Infectious Diseases, Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Lazio e Toscana, 00178 Roma Italia. 2 Istituto<br />
Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Emilia Romagna e Lombardia, Via A. Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia Italia<br />
Keywords: West Nile Disease, serological diagnosis, competitive elisa, validation<br />
Introduction<br />
In 1998, Italy reported the first equine outbreaks <strong>of</strong> West Nile<br />
Disease (WND). From 2001, a national veterinary surveillance<br />
system was adopted in areas considered at risk <strong>of</strong> WNV<br />
introduction, based on the passive surveillance <strong>of</strong> avian mortality<br />
and on the repeated serological testing <strong>of</strong> sentinel horses first in<br />
screening ELISA tests available commercially, either in a<br />
competitive format or based on the detection <strong>of</strong> IgG and IgM.<br />
Positive samples are then examined in the confirmatory test<br />
represented by the plaque neutralization reduction test. A solidphase<br />
competitive ELISA was developed and a preliminarily<br />
validation was carried by an interlaboratory trial. The data <strong>of</strong> the<br />
this preliminary validation is presented and discussed.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The procedure for the competitive ELISA (C-ELISA), object <strong>of</strong><br />
this validation, is briefly described as follows. 96 well microplate<br />
are pre-adsorbed with a monoclonal antibody (Mab), recognising<br />
the domain III (Ed III) <strong>of</strong> WND virus (WNDV), are prepared ready<br />
for use. The reaction is started by the addition <strong>of</strong> the antigen, a<br />
cell-culture cryolysate <strong>of</strong> inactivated virus, on to the plate and its<br />
incubation for 90 minutes at 37°C. In parallel to the first<br />
incubation, serum samples and controls are diluted 1:5 and 1:10<br />
on a separate plate. The samples and controls are then<br />
transferred on the adsorbed plate containing the antigen and<br />
incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C. After washing the plate, the<br />
same Mab used for adsorption is added conjugated with<br />
horseradish peroxidase. Following another incubation period <strong>of</strong><br />
90 minutes at 37°C, ortophenyl-diamine substrate is added and<br />
the plate is incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in the<br />
dark. Sulphuric acid is used to stop the enzymatic reaction, which<br />
is read using an optical density (OD) <strong>of</strong> 492nm. Sera are<br />
categorized as positive or negative according to percentage<br />
inhibition (PI), calculated as the ratio between sample and<br />
reaction control.<br />
Validation was performed according to WOAH Manual guidelines.<br />
The aim for this ELISA test is for screening purposes.<br />
Nine laboratories were involved in this validation. Pre-adsorbed<br />
plates, reagents (Mab and antigen) and a panel <strong>of</strong> sera were sent<br />
to each <strong>of</strong> them. The latter was made up <strong>of</strong> 20 sera, each<br />
replicated twice, and numbered from 1 to 40. The panel derived<br />
from the sera <strong>of</strong> five horses, two experimentally infected, two<br />
repeatedly vaccinated and one negative. The order <strong>of</strong> the sera<br />
was different for each laboratory. Each participant was requested<br />
to carry out the test three times, each time carried out by a<br />
different operator and on different days. The OD <strong>of</strong> each test was<br />
registered and returned in an Excel file. Validation criteria for the<br />
ELISA were the following: mean OD <strong>of</strong> control reaction higher<br />
than 1.0; OD <strong>of</strong> negative control < 50% <strong>of</strong> OD <strong>of</strong> control reaction<br />
for both dilutions; OD <strong>of</strong> positive control > 50% <strong>of</strong> OD <strong>of</strong> control<br />
reaction in both dilutions. Runs that did not comply with these<br />
criteria were discarded.<br />
In analysing all data the following parameters were estimated:<br />
Qualitative accuracy, estimated by:<br />
Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), Cohen K value for each<br />
laboratory, Weighted Cohen K value for each laboratory,<br />
Cohen K value for all laboratories gathered together.<br />
K values were calculated by comparing the expected results,<br />
positive and negative, with those obtained, for Cohen K value<br />
and negative, weak, medium and strong positive for Cohen K<br />
value and weighted Cohen K value.<br />
In considering both qualitative and semi-quantitative<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> the ELISA test, repeatability and reproducibility<br />
were estimated using the following parameters:<br />
Coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation (CV), Accordance, Concordance,<br />
Concordance Odds Ratio (COR), K value <strong>of</strong> all laboratories<br />
results gathered together.<br />
For details regarding the calculation <strong>of</strong> these parameters, articles<br />
by Langton et al., Quatto and Soliani et al. can be consulted<br />
(1,2,3,4).<br />
Results<br />
1.Both sensitivity and specificity resulted 100%.<br />
2.K values are shown in figure 1. K for all laboratories resulted<br />
equal to 0.76.<br />
K VALUE<br />
1,2<br />
1<br />
0,8<br />
0,6<br />
0,4<br />
0,2<br />
0<br />
K (2 cat.) WEIGHTED K (4 cat.) K(4 cat.)<br />
LAB 1 LAB 2 LAB 3 LAB 4 LAB 5 LAB 6 LAB 7 LAB 8 LAB 9<br />
Figure 1: K values for each laboratory: not weighted with 2 and 4<br />
categories, and weighted with two categories.<br />
3.Values <strong>of</strong> accordance, concordance and COR are showed in<br />
table 1.<br />
Table 1: Values <strong>of</strong> Accordance, concordance and COR for each<br />
serum and all laboratories together<br />
Serum N° Accordance Concordance COR Serum N° Accordance Concordance COR<br />
1 86,71 81,75 1,46 11 62,14 45,11 2,00<br />
2 95,29 95,24 1,01 12 75,43 74,87 1,03<br />
3 92,43 90,48 1,29 13 64,00 41,27 2,53<br />
4 100 100 1 14 66,86 52,78 1,80<br />
5 76,29 56,88 2,44 15 100 100 1<br />
6 95,29 95,24 1,01 16 100 100 1<br />
7 65,86 49,74 1,95 17 100 100 1<br />
8 86,71 81,75 1,46 18 100 100 1<br />
9 100 100 1 19 100 100 1<br />
10 100 100 1 20 100 100 1<br />
K value <strong>of</strong> all laboratories together not compared with expected<br />
results resulted equal to 0.72.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
From the results <strong>of</strong> the evaluated parameters the test is suitable<br />
for screening purposes. Accuracy is highly satisfactory since<br />
sensitivity and specificity resulted equal to 100%. Furthermore, K<br />
values indicate a degree <strong>of</strong> concordance almost perfect<br />
according to the classification <strong>of</strong> Landis et al. (5) Qualitative<br />
repeatability and reproducibility are also satisfactory since CV<br />
values are all less than 20%, value set as acceptable limit;<br />
accordance and concordance are also close to 100% in more<br />
than the half <strong>of</strong> sera. COR resulted very close to 1 for all sera<br />
except for two <strong>of</strong> them, however with a maximum value <strong>of</strong> 2.53.<br />
An additional advantage <strong>of</strong> this c-ELISA is that it can be extended<br />
to the testing <strong>of</strong> other species for which it has to be validated. To<br />
fulfil the remaining criteria set by WOAH, a second phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
validation procedure is necessary in which further parameters<br />
need to be evaluated, among which are the performances <strong>of</strong> this<br />
test on field samples.<br />
References<br />
1.S.D. Langton et al ” Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative<br />
microbiological methods: accordance and concordance”, International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology 79 (2002) 175-181<br />
2.http:/www.dsa.unipr.it/soliani/soliani.html<br />
3.J. Richard Landis e Gary G. Koch del 1977 “The measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
observer agreement for categorial data” Biometrics, Vol. 33, pp.159-174.<br />
4.P. Quatto (2004). “Un test di concordanza tra più esaminatori”. In:<br />
Statistica, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 145-151<br />
5.J. Richard Landis e Gary G. Koch del 1977 “The measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
observer agreement for categorical data” Biometrics, Vol. 33, pp.159-174.
S3 - P - 10<br />
SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF INFLUENZA A VIRUS<br />
AND NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS BY ONE STEP RT-PCR.<br />
D. Nidzworski 1 , L. Rabalski 1 , B. Szewczyk 1 , K. Śmietanka 2 , Z. Minta 2<br />
1<br />
Intercollegiate Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology University <strong>of</strong> Gdansk and Medical University <strong>of</strong> Gdansk, Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular Virology, Gdansk, Poland<br />
2<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy, Department <strong>of</strong> Poultry Diseases, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Influenza virus, Newcastle disease virus, diagnosis, RT-PCR,<br />
Introduction<br />
Newcastle disease Virus (NDV), a member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Paramyxoviridae family and Influenza A virus (IAV), from the<br />
Orthomyxoviridae family, are two main avian pathogens causing<br />
serious economic problems in poultry farming (3,4). NDV strains<br />
are classified into three major pathotypes: velogenic, mesogenic<br />
and lentogenic (2). Avian Influenza (AI) viruses are also divided<br />
into low pathogenic (LPAI) and highly pathogenic (HPAI) strains<br />
(1).Both viruses are enveloped, single stranded, negative-sense<br />
RNA viruses which give similar symptoms ranging from subclinical<br />
infections to severe disease, including loss in egg<br />
production, acute respiratory syndrome and high mortality,<br />
depending on their level <strong>of</strong> pathogenicity. This hinders the<br />
diagnosis based on clinical and post mortem examination only.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the currently available molecular detection methods are<br />
also pathogen-specific and require to perform more than one RT-<br />
PCR to confirm or exclude the presence <strong>of</strong> both pathogens.<br />
To overcome this disadvantage, we have applied One Step<br />
Duplex RT-PCR method to distinguish between those two<br />
pathogens. The main objective <strong>of</strong> the project was to develop new,<br />
fast and non-expensive method, which could be used in any<br />
veterinary laboratory.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Thirty six viruses: sixteen ND Polish pigeon strains, four ND<br />
reference strains, four Influenza and twelve other (negative<br />
control strains) viruses were isolated from allantoic fluids <strong>of</strong> SPF<br />
embryonated eggs. The 4-week-old SPF chickens were also<br />
infected with both viruses (NDV – LaSota; IV – H7N1) Swabs<br />
from cloaca and trachea were collected and examined (Tab.1).<br />
Table 1: The experimental design<br />
Actions<br />
Day <strong>of</strong> experiment<br />
Inoculation <strong>of</strong> birds (4 week old) with<br />
1<br />
LaSota and H7N1 strains<br />
Collection <strong>of</strong> cloacal and oral swabs 4<br />
Collection <strong>of</strong> cloacal and oral swabs 5<br />
RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Nini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia,<br />
CA, USA). After RNA isolation, One Step RT-PCR were carried<br />
out.<br />
Two sets <strong>of</strong> primers based on conserve fragments <strong>of</strong> the M gens<br />
<strong>of</strong> NDV and IV were used in this study:<br />
NDV-F-4011: 5’ GTCCCAAATACCGGAGACCT 3’<br />
NDV-R-4142: 5’ TTGTTTGCCACAACCCTACAG 3’<br />
IV-F-VII/25: 5’ AGATGAGTCTTCTAACCGAGGTCG 3’<br />
IV-R-VII/124: 5’ TGCAAAAACATCTTCAAGTCTCTG 3’<br />
The reaction was carried out according to the Transcriptor One-<br />
Step RT-PCR Kit protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim,<br />
Germany). The reaction mixture contained: viral RNA, both sets<br />
<strong>of</strong> primers (0,3µM each), buffer (1x), Transcriptor Enzyme Mix<br />
and water. Condition <strong>of</strong> reaction presents Tab. 2<br />
Table 2. Conditions <strong>of</strong> One Step RT-PCR reaction.<br />
Step Temp. Time Cycles<br />
Reverse<br />
transcription<br />
50ºC 30 min 1<br />
Initial<br />
denaturation<br />
94ºC 7 min 1<br />
Denaturation 94ºC 10 sec<br />
Annealing 53 ºC 30 sec 10<br />
Elongation 68 ºC 105 sec<br />
PCR pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
Denaturation 94 ºC 10 sec<br />
Annealing 60 ºC 30 sec 25<br />
Elongation 68 ºC 105 sec<br />
Final<br />
Elongation<br />
68 ºC 7 min 1<br />
Two products were expected: one for NDV – 152 base pair<br />
fragment contained conserve M gene fragment; and one for IV –<br />
102 base pair fragment also contained conserve M gene<br />
fragment. The results were visualized in 2,5% agarose gel.<br />
Results<br />
All NDV and Influenza virus strains isolated from eggs and from<br />
oral or cloacal swabs were detected by One Step RT-PCR<br />
method. The results <strong>of</strong> analysis are presented in Figure 1 and<br />
Tab. 3.<br />
NDV IV NDV+IV ntc M<br />
152 bp<br />
102 bp<br />
Figure. 1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> One Step RT-PCR reaction. 2,5% Agarose<br />
gel with EtBr. ntc – no template control, M – Mass marker (Hyper<br />
Ladder II, BioLine)<br />
Table 3. Results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> infected birds and comparison with<br />
other previously described methods.<br />
Chicken no 41 Chicken no 31<br />
AIV NDV AIV NDV<br />
A OS B OS A OS B OS<br />
4 dpi O 20.48 + n.d. n.d. 20.71 + 29.82 +<br />
4 dpi C 22.76 + 29.74 + 24.80 + >35 -<br />
5 dpi O 20.68 + 27.34 + 21.69 + 33.69 +<br />
5 dpi C 22.07 + n.d. n.d. 23.40 + >35 -<br />
Chicken no 42 Chicken no 10<br />
AIV NDV AIV NDV<br />
A OS A OS A OS B OS<br />
4 dpi O 21.68 + n.d. n.d. 21.98 + 35.00 +<br />
4 dpi C 23.94 + n.d. n.d. 19.55 + 33.39 +<br />
5 dpi O 21.86 + 34.55 + 23.34 + >35 -<br />
5 dpi C 25.01 + 34.97 + 20.72 + n.d. n.d<br />
AIV – Avian Influenza Virus; NDV – Newacastle Disease Virus; dpi – day<br />
post infection; O – Oral swab; C – Cloacal swab; n.d. – not detected; A –<br />
method <strong>of</strong> detection based on Spackman et al., 2002 (6); B – method <strong>of</strong><br />
detection based on Mia Kim et al., 2008 (5); OS – One Step RT-PCR<br />
Method; “+” – positive; “-“ – negative.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Birds infected by Newcastle Disease or Influenza virus give very<br />
similar symptoms, hard to distinguish by veterinarians even<br />
during post-mortem examination.<br />
For this reason, the new One Step RT-PCR method for direct<br />
detection and differentiation <strong>of</strong> NDV and IV was developed. One<br />
Step RT-PCR assay can be applied by veterinary diagnosticians<br />
for preliminary differentiation between NDV and Influenza virus.<br />
The ability to detect both major avian pathogens in a very easy<br />
procedure makes this method very attractive for application in<br />
veterinary laboratories.<br />
References<br />
1. Alexander, D.J. – Orthomyxovirus infections. in: Viral Infections <strong>of</strong> Birds,<br />
red: J.B. McFerran, M.S. McNulty – Elsevier Science, London 1993, 287-<br />
316<br />
2. Beard, C, Hanson, R (1984). Newcastle Disease. In: H<strong>of</strong>stad, M,<br />
Barnes, H, Calnek, B, Reid, W, Yoder, H. (Eds.) Disease <strong>of</strong> Poultry, 8 th ed.<br />
Iowa State University Press, Ames, 452-470.<br />
3. Capua, I., Alexander, D.J. - Avian influenza and human health - Acta<br />
Tropica 83 (2002), 1–6<br />
4. Lamb, R, Collins,P, Kolak<strong>of</strong>sky, D, Melero J, Nagai,Y, Oldstone, M,<br />
Pringle,C, Rima, B. Family paramyxoviridae. In: Fauquet, C, Mayo M,<br />
Manil<strong>of</strong>f J, Desselberger, U, Ball, L. (Eds.) Virus Taxonomy, VIII th Report <strong>of</strong><br />
the International Committee on Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Viruses. Elsevier Academic<br />
Press, San Diego, 655-668.<br />
5. Mia Kim, L., Suarez, D.L., Afonso, C.L., 2008. Detection <strong>of</strong> a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> class I and II Newcastle disease viruses using a multiplex real<br />
time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Vet. Diagn.<br />
Invest. 20, 414-425.<br />
6. Spackman, E, Senne, DA, Myers, TJ, Bulaga, LL, Garber, LP, Perdue,<br />
ML, Lohman, K, Daum, LT, Suarez, DL , 2002. Development <strong>of</strong> a real-time<br />
reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian<br />
H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes.J. Clin Microbiol., 40, 3256
S3 - P - 11<br />
DOLPHIN MORBILLIVIRUS INFECTION IN A CAPTIVE HARBOR SEAL (PHOCA VITULINA)<br />
Sandro Mazzariol 1 , Francesco Grande 2 , Cristina Pilenga 2 , Paola Modesto 3 , Cristina Biolatti 3 , Giovanni Di<br />
Guardo 4 , Alessandra Mondin 5 , Simone Peletto 3 , Pier Luigi Acutis 3<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Comparative Biomedicine and Nutrition (BCA), University <strong>of</strong> Padua, Legnaro, Italy<br />
2 Zoomarine Italia, Rome, Italy<br />
3 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Turin, Italy<br />
4 Department <strong>of</strong> Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Teramo, Teramo, Italy<br />
5<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Medicine and Health, University <strong>of</strong> Padua, Legnaro, Italy<br />
morbillivirus, DMV, harbor seal, transmission, phylogeny<br />
Introduction<br />
During the last 25 years morbilliviral infections have caused<br />
dramatic mortalities among several aquatic mammal species and<br />
populations worldwide (1). In particular, Dolphin Morbillivirus<br />
(DMV) represents a major biological threat for free-ranging<br />
cetaceans. In the Mediterranean Sea, DMV has been responsible<br />
for two epidemics, the first <strong>of</strong> which caused a dramatic mortality<br />
among striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) between 1990<br />
and 1992, while the second one was firstly reported in the<br />
western Mediterranean in 2006-2008, moving thereafter eastward<br />
along the French and the Italian coastlines. In June 2011, one<br />
bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and one striped dolphin<br />
stranded along the Tyrrhenian coastline, close to Rome. Both<br />
animals were found molecularly (RT-PCR) positive to<br />
Morbillivirus. Personnel from a marine park helped the stranding<br />
network with the bottlenose dolphin, which stranded alive and<br />
died after one day <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation. Standard quarantine protocols<br />
were applied, in order to avoid any contact with cetaceans kept in<br />
the park. On July 25 th , 2011, an 8-years-old male harbor seal<br />
(Phoca vitulina) hosted inside the aforementioned park was<br />
submitted for post-mortem examination after a short history <strong>of</strong><br />
anorexia, tremors, abdominal contractions, and polyuria with<br />
hypothermia and vomit in the last phases.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
A complete post-mortem investigation was carried out the day<br />
after death. Samples from main organs (brain, lungs, heart, liver,<br />
kidneys, GI tract, spleen, lymph nodes) were fixed in 10% neutral<br />
buffered formalin, paraffin-embedded and routinely processed for<br />
histopathology. Samples from intestine and kidneys were<br />
submitted for routine microbiological exams while cerebral,<br />
hepatic, cardiac, splenic, pulmonary and lymph node tissues<br />
were preserved frozen for molecular analyses.<br />
Molecular investigations were carried out to look for the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> Canine Distemper Virus (CDV), Phocine Distemper Virus<br />
(PDV) and Cetacean Morbillivirus (CeMV) nucleic acids. Multiple<br />
sequence alignment was performed with the s<strong>of</strong>tware BioEdit<br />
using CLUSTAL W. An identity matrix was created to compare<br />
sequenced products with morbillivirus sequences deposited in<br />
GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA 5.0<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware. The tree topology was inferred by the maximum<br />
likelihood method with Kimura 2-parameter model. The reliability<br />
<strong>of</strong> the topology was tested by bootstrapping 1,000 replicates.<br />
Results<br />
Necropsy revealed a mild gastro-enteritis and splenitis due to<br />
Aeromonas hydrophyla, along with hepatic and renal necrosis<br />
presumably due to endotoxemia. Besides these pathological<br />
findings, a generalized and diffuse lymph node enlargement was<br />
observed, along with a severe meningeal hyperemia and<br />
choroidal edema. Histologically, a severe and diffuse reactive<br />
lymphadenopathy was apparent, with lesions being characterized<br />
by lymphoid cell depletion, hyalinosis, and several multinucleate<br />
syncytia. A mild, multifocal, chronic choriomeningitis with white<br />
matter spongiosis and demyelination were also apparent, with<br />
eosinophilic inclusion bodies being also found in the cytoplasm <strong>of</strong><br />
brain neurons and glial cells. Furthermore, the lung showed a<br />
mild, chronic bronchointerstitial pneumonia, with simultaneous<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> bronchiolar epithelial cell hyperplasia/hypertrophy.<br />
Pathological findings suggested a morbilliviral infection, which<br />
was confirmed by RT-PCR, with CeMV-specific genome<br />
sequences being subsequently amplified from the brain <strong>of</strong> this<br />
seal. CDV and PDV molecular analyses were negative. Similarity<br />
was 97.6-99.5% with known DMV sequences and 85.9-89.6%<br />
with other CeMV members (Porpoise Morbillivirus and the<br />
tentatively named Pilot Whale Morbillivirus). Phylogenetic<br />
analysis confirmed clustering <strong>of</strong> the harbor seal CeMV sequence<br />
with previously reported DMV sequences from cetacean species<br />
(Figure 1).<br />
53<br />
75<br />
DMV AJ608288<br />
95 DMV AY586536<br />
DMV Z36978<br />
DMV AJ224705<br />
94<br />
DMV Sc/2007 HQ829973<br />
75 DMV Gme/2007 HQ829972<br />
Harbor seal<br />
PWMV 20E FJ842382<br />
90<br />
PMV IRL88 FJ648457<br />
PMV 2990 AY586537<br />
MeV UK140H94 U29285<br />
69<br />
RPV LA96 JN234010<br />
PPRV ICV89 EU267273<br />
PDV AF479277<br />
CDV EU716337<br />
SeV X56131<br />
0.2<br />
Figure 1: Maximum Likelihood dendrogram, based on the Kimura<br />
2-parameter model, illustrating haemagglutinin gene (H)<br />
nucleotide sequence relationships <strong>of</strong> morbilliviruses.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
During the last epidemic outbreak, morbilliviral infection was<br />
reported in several species besides striped dolphins, namely pilot<br />
whales (Globicephala melas), bottlenose dolphins, Risso’s<br />
dolphins (Grampus griseus), and fin whales (Balaenoptera<br />
physalus). Although the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> these cetacean species<br />
was already known, no reports other than the present one have<br />
ever described DMV transmission to harbor seals. Indeed,<br />
infection <strong>of</strong> pinniped species with morbilliviruses <strong>of</strong> cetacean<br />
origin was previously speculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> serological<br />
cross-reactivity and sequence homology (2). On a global scale,<br />
mortality events in both this and in other pinniped species such<br />
as grey seals (Halichoerus grypus), Bajkal seals (Pusa siberica),<br />
and Caspian seals (P. caspica) have been respectively linked to<br />
PDV and to CDV, with the former agent being more closely<br />
related to CDV than to any other known morbillivirus, while DMV<br />
appears to be more closely related to Rinderpest Virus (RPV).<br />
Apart from their diverging phylogeny and their phylogenetic<br />
distances, DMV and CDV could share similar epidemiologic<br />
features. This hypothesis is strongly supported by the<br />
simultaneous evidence <strong>of</strong> morbilliviral infection in the two freeranging<br />
dolphins found beached ashore near Rome before this<br />
captive seal died. Therefore, a possible route <strong>of</strong> virus (DMV)<br />
entry into the facility could have been represented by either the<br />
personnel and/or the instruments used for the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Morbillivirus-infected bottlenose dolphin that was found stranded<br />
alive one month before. In conclusion, this report emphasizes<br />
that, apart from cetaceans, also pinniped species such as harbor<br />
seals are susceptible to DMV infection and related mortality.<br />
Therefore, strict quarantine procedures should be enforced also<br />
in structures where pinnipeds are kept when injured or stranded<br />
cetaceans are hospitalized within these facilities.<br />
References<br />
1. Di Guardo G, Mazzariol S, Fernández A. (2011). Biologically threatened<br />
dolphins and whales. Environmental Microbiology, 13(11), 2833-4.<br />
2. Van de Bildt MWG, Martina BEE, Vedder EJ et al. (2000). Identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> morbilliviruses <strong>of</strong> probable cetacean origin in carcases <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean<br />
monk seals (Monachus monachus). Veterinary Record, 10, 691-4.
S3 - P - 12<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN AFRICAN SWINE FEVER INDIRECT ELISA BASED<br />
ON THREE RECOMBINANT ASF PROTEINS<br />
Pourquier, P. 1 , Loic, C. 1,<br />
1<br />
IDvet, Montpellier, France<br />
African Swine Fever, diagnostics, serology, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious, viral<br />
haemorrhagic disease <strong>of</strong> pigs, warthogs, European wild boar and<br />
American wild pigs caused by the African Swine Fever Virus<br />
(ASFV). There is neither treatment nor vaccine for ASF. To<br />
prevent introduction and spread <strong>of</strong> the disease, countries<br />
implement strict surveillance, control and eradication programs<br />
which require accurate and reliable diagnostic tests.<br />
In this context, IDvet has launched the ID Screen ® African Swine<br />
Fever Indirect ELISA. This test detects anti-ASFV antibodies in<br />
domestic or wild pigs, in serum, plasma or blood filter paper<br />
samples.<br />
Unique features <strong>of</strong> the ID Screen ® African Swine Fever Indirect<br />
ELISA include the coating <strong>of</strong> three recombinant ASFV antigens<br />
(P32, P62, and P72), and the ability to use the test with blood<br />
filter paper samples as well as serum and plasma.<br />
This study presents the preliminary validation data obtained for<br />
this ELISA kit on both serum and filter paper samples.<br />
References<br />
1. Barderas MG et al, 2000. Serodiagnosis <strong>of</strong> African Swine Fever using<br />
the recombinant protein p30 expresses in insect larvae. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
virological methods, 89:129-136.<br />
2. Gallardo C et al, 2009. Recombinant antigen targets for serodiagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
African Swine Fever. 16 :1012-1020.<br />
3. Gallardo C et al, 2006. Antigenic properties and diagnostic potential <strong>of</strong><br />
African Swine Fever virus protein p62 expressed in insect cells. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
clinical microbiology, 44 : 950-956.<br />
4. Hutching GH et al, 2006. Indirect sandwich ELISA for antigen detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> African Swine Fever virus : comparison <strong>of</strong> polyclonal and monoclonal<br />
antibodies. Journal <strong>of</strong> virological methods, 131:213-217.<br />
5. OIE, 2008. Manuel terrestre de l’OIE : African Swine Fever. Chapitre<br />
2.8.1.<br />
6. Sanz et al, 1985. Monoclonal antibodies specific for African Swine Fever<br />
Virus proteins. Journal <strong>of</strong> virology, 54:199-206.<br />
Material & methods<br />
The ID Screen ® African Swine Fever Indirect is based on three<br />
recombinant ASFV antigens (P32, P62, and P72) and an antiswine-HRP<br />
conjugate. Analyses were performed as per<br />
manufacturer’s specifications.<br />
Results<br />
Specificity<br />
- 556 disease-free sera from domestic pigs (France and Norway),<br />
wild boars (France), and Iberian pigs (Spain) were tested. All<br />
samples were found negative.<br />
- 90 negative animals were tested by both the serum and filter<br />
paper protocols. All sera were found negative by both protocols.<br />
Sensitivity<br />
- 3 sera were tested from pigs vaccinated on day 0 and day 24<br />
with the ASF strain Ourt88/3, challenged on day 42 with a mild<br />
ASF strain (ANSES, Ploufragan, France), and bled on day 62 or<br />
63. After challenge, all three animals gave strong positive results<br />
with the ID Screen ® African Swine Fever Indirect ELISA.<br />
- 8 reference sera provided by the Community Reference<br />
Laboratory (CRL), CISA-INIA, Spain were analysed. The ID<br />
Screen® African Swine Fever Indirect ELISA accurately identified<br />
all sera.<br />
- 92 sera from infected herds (Sassari, Sardinia, Italy) were<br />
tested in parallel by the ID Screen ® ELISA and the CRL ELISA<br />
reagents (CISA-INIA, Spain). Test correlation was found to be<br />
95.7%. The relative sensitivity and specificity were 97.67% and<br />
97.83%, respectively.<br />
- 3 sera were titrated and tested by both the serum and filter<br />
paper protocols. The measured analytical sensitivity was similar<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> the sample type tested (serum, Whatman 1 or<br />
Whatman 3 filter paper).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The ID Screen ® African Swine Fever Indirect ELISA is an efficient<br />
and reliable tool for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> ASF in wild and domestic<br />
species.<br />
It is the only commercial ELISA based on 3 recombinant<br />
antigens. Both the serum and filter paper test protocols show<br />
excellent sensitivity and specificity<br />
Collecting blood using filter paper facilitates sample collection in<br />
the field. With the ID Screen protocol, filter paper samples may<br />
be tested in a 96-well deep-well plate, making sample processing<br />
faster and less prone to mix-ups.
S3 - P - 13<br />
ONE STEP RT-PCR FOLLOWED BY MSSCP AS A NOVEL METHOD FOR A FAST AND RELIABLE<br />
DETECTION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF MIXED INFECTION WITH NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS OF<br />
DIFFERENT ORIGIN.<br />
L. Rabalski 1 , D. Nidzworski 1 , B. Szewczyk 1 , K. Śmietanka 2 , Z. Minta 2<br />
1<br />
Intercollegiate Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology University <strong>of</strong> Gdansk and Medical University <strong>of</strong> Gdansk, Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular Virology, Gdansk, Poland<br />
2<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy, Department <strong>of</strong> Poultry Diseases, Pulawy, Poland<br />
MSSCP, differentiation <strong>of</strong> strands, RT-PCR, Newcastle disease<br />
Introduction<br />
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) is an avian enveloped virus<br />
containing linear non-segmented single-stranded RNA (Lamb et<br />
al., 2005). It belongs to the Mononegavirales order,<br />
Paramyxoviridae family and Avulavirus genus. NDV strains are<br />
classified into three major pathotypes: velogenic, mesogenic and<br />
lentogenic (Beard and Hanson, 1984). Vaccination (with live<br />
virus) does not protect against the spread <strong>of</strong> virulent form <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus. Detection <strong>of</strong> the field virus in immunized population <strong>of</strong> birds<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> conventional diagnostic methods is costly and time<br />
consuming. To overcome this disadvantage, we have applied<br />
One Step RT-PCR and Multitemperature Single-Strand<br />
Conformational Polymorphism (MSSCP) methods in our<br />
laboratories to distinguish between pathogenic and vaccine<br />
strains <strong>of</strong> the NDV. Classical single-strand conformational<br />
polymorphism (SSCP) analysis is based on the observation that<br />
single stranded DNA fragments attain a number <strong>of</strong><br />
conformational forms which may be separated by native<br />
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis giving a characteristic pattern<br />
<strong>of</strong> electrophoretic bands. Point mutations, other minor changes in<br />
nucleotide sequence, as well as physico-chemical conditions like<br />
ionic strength, pH and temperature may have significant effect on<br />
electrophoretic pattern <strong>of</strong> single stranded DNA (Orita et al.,<br />
1989). By sequential changes <strong>of</strong> separation temperature it is<br />
possible to increase the resolution <strong>of</strong> single-strand DNA bands;<br />
this technique was named MSSCP (where M stands for<br />
“multitemperature”) (Kaczanowski et al., 2001).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
SPF chickens housed in isolation were infected oculonasally with<br />
three different strains <strong>of</strong> NDV (LaSota – lentogenic, Roakin –<br />
mesogenic and Italy – velogenic). Swabs from cloaca and<br />
oropharynx were collected at different time-points post infection<br />
(Tab.1). After RNA isolation and One Step RT-PCR, 123bp DNA<br />
<strong>of</strong> viral fusion (“F”) gene fragments were obtained (Fig. 1). PCR<br />
products were denatured (3’ in 97C) and subjected to MSSCP<br />
electrophoresis where, after silver staining, they gave specific<br />
ssDNA band patterns.<br />
Table 1: The experimental design<br />
Actions<br />
Inoculation <strong>of</strong> birds with<br />
LaSota and Roakin NDV<br />
strains<br />
Inoculation <strong>of</strong> birds with Italy<br />
NDV strain<br />
Collection <strong>of</strong> cloacal and<br />
oropharyngeal swabs<br />
Day <strong>of</strong> experiment<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3, 4 ,5 ,6 ,7, 10<br />
Results<br />
Three embryo-grown NDV strains (separately and mixed<br />
together) were tested for the level <strong>of</strong> detection. We found it<br />
possible to determine the presence <strong>of</strong> the minor variant <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus, even when its contribution was less than 0.1% <strong>of</strong> total<br />
sample. After MSSCP analysis, characteristic ssDNA band<br />
patterns were obtained for each NDV strain. Both artificially<br />
mixed and swab samples showed a combined pattern <strong>of</strong> bands<br />
making it easy to identify the composition <strong>of</strong> samples (Fig. 2).<br />
Figure 1: 123bp PCR product at 7 days after infection (digit -<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> the chicken, G - oropharyngeal swabs,<br />
K – cloacal swabs, M - HyperLadder IV - 100bp-1000bp)<br />
Figure 2: MSSCP patterns <strong>of</strong> 123bp PCR product (M -<br />
HyperLadder IV - 100bp-1000bp, L – LaSota, R – Roakin,<br />
I – Italy, number – level <strong>of</strong> matrix concentration)<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
MSSCP combined with One Step RT-PCR can be applied for the<br />
detection and preliminary characterization <strong>of</strong> NDV without the<br />
need for nucleotide sequencing. The ability to diagnose multistrain<br />
infections and to detect the minor viral variant are the main<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> the proposed method. Additionally, we confirm the<br />
observation that vaccination does not protect against virus<br />
replication and shedding in chickens.<br />
The developed method can be especially helpful in the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> field infection in flocks immunized with live vaccines provided<br />
that we know the MSSCP pattern <strong>of</strong> an NDV strain used for<br />
vaccination. In such cases an RT-PCR method alone yields<br />
postitive results irrespective <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> strains present in<br />
the tested sample while the sequencing shows the overlapping<br />
peaks <strong>of</strong> fluorsecence. If the MSSCP patterns <strong>of</strong> NDV present in<br />
the sample are not known, there is a possibility to cut the bands<br />
from the gel and sequence them separately.<br />
References<br />
1. Orita, M, Iwahana, H, Kanazawa, H, Hayashi, K, Sekiya, T (1989).<br />
Detection <strong>of</strong> polymorphisms <strong>of</strong> human DNA by gel electrophoresis as<br />
single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA, 86,<br />
2766-70.<br />
2. Kaczanowski, R, Trzeciak, L, Kucharczyk, K (2001). Multitemperature<br />
single-strand conformation polymorphism. Electrophoresis, 22, 3539-45.<br />
3. Lamb, R, Collins,P, Kolak<strong>of</strong>sk, D, Melero J, Nagai,Y, Oldstone, M,<br />
Pringle,C, Rima, B. Family paramyxoviridae. In: Fauquet, C, Mayo M,<br />
Manil<strong>of</strong>f J, Desselberger, U, Ball, L. (Eds.) Virus Taxonomy, VIII th Report <strong>of</strong><br />
the International Committee on Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Viruses. Elsevier Academic<br />
Press, San Diego, 655-668.<br />
4. Beard, C, Hanson, R (1984). Newcastle Disease. In: H<strong>of</strong>stad, M,<br />
Barnes, H, Calnek, B, Reid, W, Yoder, H. (Eds.) Disease <strong>of</strong> Poultry, 8 th ed.<br />
Iowa State University Press, Ames, 452-470.
S3 - P - 14<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISPECIES SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS TO DETECT ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC<br />
FOR Mycobacterium bovis IN SERUM SAMPLES<br />
Lisset López 1 , Ana Ranz 1 , Angel Venteo 1 , Teresa Pérez 1 , Tamara Ruiz 1 , L DeJuan 2 , Beatriz Romero 2 , Mariana<br />
Boadella 3 , Christian Gortázar 3 , Beatrice Boniotti 4 , Paolo Pasquali 5 , Paloma Rueda 1<br />
1 1 INGENASA, Madrid Spain; 2 VISAVET, Madrid, Spain; 3 IREC, Barcelona, Spain; 4 I.Z.S. della Lombardia e dell'Emilia, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Istituto Superiore di<br />
Sanità di Roma, Roma, Italy<br />
Tuberculosis, PEN-SIDE TEST, DIAGNOSTIC, ELISA DR<br />
Introduction<br />
Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic bacterial disease <strong>of</strong><br />
animals and humans caused by M. bovis. In a large number <strong>of</strong><br />
countries bovine tuberculosis is a major infectious disease<br />
among cattle, other domesticated animals, and certain wildlife<br />
populations. Transmission to humans constitutes a public health<br />
problem. For years eradication programmes have been carried<br />
out. Traditional mycobacterium culture remains the gold<br />
standard method for routine confirmation <strong>of</strong> infection but<br />
Delayed Hypersensitivity test and gamma-interferon test are the<br />
ones used in these programmes. Detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies<br />
specific could be a useful alternative for TB diagnosis. Different<br />
antibodies detection assays have been described although all <strong>of</strong><br />
them present sensitivity problems<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study has been to develop and validate<br />
multispecies assays based on Double Recognition ELISA<br />
(ELISA-DR) and Immunochromatography (IC) techniques for<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies specific <strong>of</strong> M. bovis. using the<br />
recombinant protein MPB83, expressed in insect cells.<br />
Material & methods<br />
Recombinant proteins ESAT6, CFP10, MPB64, MPB70 y MPB<br />
83 were obtained, expressed and purified. Finally, MPB83 was<br />
selected as the antigen for serological assays (ELISA and IC<br />
assays)<br />
To validate these assays, sera from different species previously<br />
catalogued by gamma interferon assay (72 bovine sera), by<br />
culture (46 buck, 205 wild boar) or by necropsy (205 deer and<br />
138 wild boar experimental sera) were used. Moreover, cross<br />
reactivity with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis was<br />
determined. For this propose sera and plasma <strong>of</strong> 9 cows and 9<br />
goats positive to Paratuberculosis and negative to TB were<br />
used.<br />
Samples from different wild species such as alpaca, elephant<br />
and American bison are going to be tested. In addition sera<br />
collected from wild boar and deer are being evaluated.<br />
Table 2.<br />
Ref: ELISA DR<br />
SPECIES N Accuracy<br />
CATTLE 13 77%<br />
WILD BOAR 200 90%<br />
BUCK 46 89%<br />
DEER 22 77%<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
INGENASA has developed two multispecies assays based on<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> the recombinant protein MPB83 expressed in insect<br />
cells. More than 300 samples from different species have been<br />
analyzed giving high percentages <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and specificity.<br />
Although higher number <strong>of</strong> samples is necessary, preliminary<br />
results suggest that both diagnostic approaches are very useful<br />
methods for control and surveillance <strong>of</strong> TB infection.<br />
The immunochromatographic assay can become a useful tool in<br />
situations where laboratory support and skilled personnel are<br />
limited.<br />
References<br />
1. Schiller et al. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. (2010),<br />
57:205-220<br />
2. Boadella et al. Preventive Veterinary Medicine (<strong>2012</strong>), 104:160-164<br />
3. Waters et al. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology (2011), 18:1882-1888<br />
(KBBE-2007-1-3-04) Strategies for the eradication <strong>of</strong> bovine tuberculosis<br />
(TB-STEP)<br />
Results.<br />
Preliminary results show that both assays detect antibodies<br />
specific <strong>of</strong> TB. None <strong>of</strong> them showed cross-reaction with<br />
antibodies to PTB. Depending on the species analyzed,<br />
sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong> ELISA-DR range between 70-100%<br />
and 92-97%, respectively (Table I). Concerning to IC, accuracy<br />
with respect to ELISA DR ranged between 77 and 90%<br />
depending on the species studied (TABLE II).<br />
Table 1<br />
ELISA-DR<br />
SPECIES N Sensitivity Specificity REFERENCE<br />
CATTLE 72 88% 96% Bovigam®<br />
WILD BOAR 138 100% 97% Necropsy<br />
WILD BOAR 200 82% 92% Culture<br />
BUCK 46 70% 94% Culture<br />
DEER 205 93% 92% Necropsy
S3 - P - 15<br />
FIRST REPORTED LOW PATHOGENCITY AVIAN INFLEUNZA VIRUS SUBTYPE H9 INFECTION OF<br />
DOMESTIC FOWL IN ENGLAND<br />
C. Daniel Parker 1 , Scott M. Reid 2 , Allan Ball 1 , William J. Cox 2 , Steve C. Essen 2 , Amanda Hanna 2 ,<br />
Marek J. Slomka 2 , Richard M. Irvine 2 , Ian H. Brown 2<br />
1 Slate Hall Veterinary Practice Ltd, Unit 7 Highgate Farm, Over Road, Willingham, Cambridge, CB24 5EU<br />
2 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB<br />
Avian influenza virus, H9 real-time RT-PCR, broiler breeders, UK poultry, Egg drop in poultry<br />
Introduction<br />
Poultry outbreaks, caused by avian influenza (AI) viruses <strong>of</strong><br />
H9N2 subtype, have been reported in many parts <strong>of</strong> Asia and the<br />
Middle East since the 1990s where they may be considered as<br />
being endemic (1, 2). Although H9 virus infections are typically<br />
characterised as being <strong>of</strong> low pathogenicity (LP) and are not<br />
classified as notifiable disease (3), LPAI H9N2 poultry outbreaks<br />
in these regions continue to be characterised clinically by<br />
respiratory disease and a reduction in egg production (4).<br />
However, since the more recent emergence <strong>of</strong> a significant H9N2<br />
poultry problem in Asia and the Middle East, the present paper<br />
presents the first detailed epidemiological investigation <strong>of</strong> a H9<br />
poultry outbreak in the UK and indeed in Europe. This occurred in<br />
the East Anglia region in December 2010 in a broiler breeder<br />
flock, and an important aspect <strong>of</strong> the outbreak investigation was<br />
the successful use <strong>of</strong> molecular methods to identify and<br />
characterise the AIV subtype.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Disease suspicion was based on acute drops in egg production in<br />
two <strong>of</strong> four sheds, poor egg shell quality and evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
diarrhoea. Cloacal and oropharyngeal swabs from 60 chickens<br />
from each <strong>of</strong> two affected houses were pooled (n=48) into groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> five swabs obtained from the same anatomical site. All swab<br />
pools were inoculated into 10-day-old embryonated SPF fowls’<br />
eggs, and allantoic fluids were harvested and tested for the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> any haemagglutinating agent (5). Four AI real-time<br />
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR)<br />
assays were used to test the RNA extracts: (i) the Matrix (M)-<br />
gene assay for generic AI detection; (ii) H5 and H7 AI virus RRT-<br />
PCR assays to test for notifiable avian influenza (NAI); (iii) an H9<br />
RRT-PCR; (iv) selected RNA extracts were tested by an N1 RRT-<br />
PCR. The RNA extracts were simultaneously screened for<br />
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) using primers and probes<br />
targeting the L-gene <strong>of</strong> NDV. RNA extracted from the positive<br />
cloacal swab specimen A/chicken/England/1415-51184/10 was<br />
used for nucleotide sequencing. The HA and neuraminidase (NA)<br />
genes were amplified by conventional reverse transcription (RT)-<br />
PCR, sequenced and analysed phylogenetically.<br />
poultry for 40 years vindicates the need for continued vigilance<br />
and surveillance <strong>of</strong> AI viruses in poultry populations.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors thank Andrew Gibson, Mark Spelman and Simon<br />
Rednall from the farm management team, Sue Graham <strong>of</strong> Slate<br />
Hall Veterinary Practice Ltd for her laboratory assistance and Dr<br />
Dennis Alexander <strong>of</strong> AHVLA for technical assistance. This study<br />
was supported by Defra contract ED1300: Scanning Surveillance<br />
for Disease in Poultry and Game Birds in England, Scotland and<br />
Wales.<br />
References<br />
1.Alexander, DJ (2007). An overview <strong>of</strong> the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> avian<br />
influenza. Vaccine 25:5637–5644.<br />
2.Capua, I, Alexander, DJ (2007) Avian influenza infections in birds – a<br />
moving target. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 1:11–18.<br />
3.OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). (2008). World Health<br />
Organisation for Animal Health, Terrestrial Animal Health Code, chapter<br />
10.4 “Avian influenza”. OIE: Paris. Available at:<br />
http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mcode/en_chapitre_1.10.4.pdf<br />
4.Swayne, DE, Halvorson, DA (2003). Influenza. In ”Diseases <strong>of</strong> Poultry”,<br />
pp135-160. Eds: YM Saif, HJ Barnes, JR Glisom, AM Fadly, LR<br />
McDougald and DE Swayne. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.<br />
5.OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). (2010). Manual <strong>of</strong><br />
Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, chapter 2.3.4.<br />
“Avian influenza”. Paris: OIE. Available at:<br />
http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.03.04_AI.<br />
p<br />
Results<br />
Attempted virus isolation in embryonated SPF fowls’ eggs was<br />
unsuccessful. H9N1 LPAI virus infection was confirmed by RRT-<br />
PCR. Sequencing <strong>of</strong> the haemagglutinin and neuraminidase<br />
genes revealed high nucleotide identity <strong>of</strong> 93.6% and 97.9% with<br />
contemporary North American H9 and Eurasian N1 genes,<br />
respectively. Epidemiological investigations were conducted to<br />
identify the source <strong>of</strong> infection and any onward spread.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This is the first known report <strong>of</strong> an H9 subtype avian influenza<br />
infection in poultry in England. The infecting subtype was H9N1<br />
and phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> the HA and NA genes indicated<br />
North American and Eurasian origins for these two genes, which<br />
suggested that this AIV may be a reassortment that consists <strong>of</strong><br />
genetic segments <strong>of</strong> diverse geographic origin. The source <strong>of</strong> the<br />
influenza virus infection could not clearly be established.<br />
Following the infection, epidemiological investigations failed to<br />
identify any human, inter- or intra-company contacts that could<br />
have introduced the virus onto the farm. No other breeder or<br />
poultry farms in the area were known to be infected. Infection<br />
followed a period <strong>of</strong> extremely cold weather and snow which<br />
could have compromised disease security. Wild bird activity<br />
around the farm buildings was significantly higher during this cold<br />
weather period as birds foraged for feed. In the present episode,<br />
clinical signs were relatively mild in the poultry with no mortality.<br />
However, this first reported detection <strong>of</strong> H9 LPAI virus in UK
S3 - P - 16<br />
DETECTION OF IBV QX IN COMMERCIAL POULTRY FLOCKS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Richard M. Irvine 1 , Rebecca M. Jones 1 , Richard J. Ellis 1 , Jennifer L. Cork 1 ,<br />
Jane Errington 2 , William J. Cox 1 , Vanessa Ceeraz 1 , Alisdair M. Wood 3 , Scott M. Reid 1 ,<br />
Ian H. Brown 1<br />
1 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency – Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK;<br />
2 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency – Penrith, Merrythought, Calthwaite, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 9RR, UK;<br />
3 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency – Lasswade, International Research Centre, Pentland Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian<br />
EH26 0PZ, UK.<br />
Infectious bronchitis virus, IBV QX strain, IBV real-time RT-PCR, IBV S1 genotyping, UK commercial poultry flocks<br />
Introduction<br />
The QX strain <strong>of</strong> infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) was first<br />
detection in China between 1995 and 2004, associated with<br />
nephritis, mortality and egg production problems in IBVvaccinated<br />
flocks (1). Strains <strong>of</strong> IBV showing a close relationship<br />
with the so-called Chinese QX strain <strong>of</strong> IBV (IBV QX) have<br />
recently been detected in the UK. Following the initial isolation <strong>of</strong><br />
a QX-like variant strain serologically unrelated to the major UK<br />
contemporary IBV strains from a small backyard flock during<br />
2007, European IBV QX-like strains have been detected in<br />
backyard and hobby flocks. Since 2009, such strains have also<br />
been detected in samples submitted for diagnostic investigation<br />
from commercial poultry flocks (2).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Diagnostic samples testing positive by IBV real-time reverse<br />
transcription polymerase chain reaction were subject to partial<br />
sequencing <strong>of</strong> the S1 gene (3). Primers and probes were<br />
optimised for sequencing a fragment <strong>of</strong> the S1 gene (c. 450 bp).<br />
For an initial genotyping test, a 140bp region was compared to a<br />
library <strong>of</strong> IBV S1 gene sequences.<br />
Results<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> the entire 450bp region for the QX strains allowed<br />
separate sub-lineages to be identified. Whilst the European IBV<br />
QX-like genotypes detected from commercial poultry flocks in<br />
Great Britain (GB) and Northern Ireland are closely related,<br />
differences are apparent in the S1 sequence, revealing separate<br />
sub-lineages (Figure 1). The greatest differences occur between<br />
European IBV QX-like strains detected from backyard poultry and<br />
commercial flocks. Furthermore, strains from some commercial<br />
poultry flocks in GB share a higher degree <strong>of</strong> S1 sequence<br />
homology with each other and a strain detected from poultry in<br />
The Netherlands.<br />
SA12- 008180<br />
SA12- 013762<br />
SA12- 007589<br />
SA12- 009984<br />
SA12- 009987 SA12-013717<br />
SA12-013719<br />
SA12-013721<br />
SA12-013722<br />
SA12-011754<br />
SA12-011755<br />
SA12-006209<br />
SA12-006211<br />
SA12- 010211<br />
SA12- 010573<br />
SA12- 010575<br />
SA12- 010825<br />
SA12- 010827<br />
SA12-005257<br />
SA12-010215<br />
SA12-004866<br />
SA12-006034<br />
Jun- 164-S3<br />
AVP - 09- 023587<br />
AVP - 09- 023588<br />
SA12- 011173<br />
Poulvac-QX -Vaccine<br />
QX AV2150/07<br />
SA12-014043<br />
AV418-trachea<br />
AVI-08- 035383<br />
AVI-08-022254<br />
SA12-011670<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Together, these data revealed differences by sector, suggesting<br />
that separate routes <strong>of</strong> introduction may have occurred.<br />
Emergence <strong>of</strong> a novel variant such as IBV QX might threaten<br />
commercial poultry production as currently-used vaccines might<br />
not be fully protective and the severity <strong>of</strong> disease caused by<br />
novel strains may differ from that caused by extant strains. This<br />
may result in substantial losses. Experimental studies have<br />
demonstrated that protection may be afforded against infection<br />
with IBV QX-like strains in young chickens by existing vaccines<br />
and vaccine combinations (4). However, further work is required<br />
to fully understand the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> IBV QX in UK poultry<br />
populations.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was supported by Defra contract ED1300: Scanning<br />
Surveillance for Disease in Poultry and Game Birds in England,<br />
Scotland and Wales.<br />
References<br />
1. Liu, SW, Zhang, QX, Chen, JD, Han, ZX, Liu, X, Feng, L, Shao, YH,<br />
Rong, JG, Kong, XG, Tong, GZ (2006). Genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> avian<br />
infectious bronchitis coronavirus strains isolated in China between 1995<br />
and 2004. Archives <strong>of</strong> Virology 151: 1133-1148.<br />
2. Irvine, RM, Cox, WJ, Ceeraz, V, Reid, SM, Ellis, RJ, Jones, RM,<br />
Errington, J, Wood, AM, McVicar, C, Clark, MI (2010). Detection <strong>of</strong> IBV QX<br />
in commercial broiler flocks in the UK. Veterinary Record 167:877-879.<br />
http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/167/22/877.2.full.pdf<br />
3. Jones, RM, Ellis, RJ, Cox, WJ, Errington, J, Fuller, C, Irvine, RM,<br />
Wakeley, PR (2011). Development and Validation <strong>of</strong> RT-PCR Tests for the<br />
Detection and S1 Genotyping <strong>of</strong> Infectious Bronchitis Virus and other<br />
Closely Related Gammacoronaviruses Within Clinical Samples.<br />
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58 (5): 411–420.<br />
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1865-<br />
1682.2011.01222.x/abstract.<br />
4 Terregino, C, T<strong>of</strong>fan, A, Beato, MS, Nardi, R, Vascellari, M, Meini, A,<br />
Ortali, G, Mancin, M, Capua, I (2008). Pathogenicity <strong>of</strong> a QX strain <strong>of</strong><br />
infectious bronchitis virus in specific pathogen free and commercial broiler<br />
chickens, and evaluation <strong>of</strong> protection induced by a vaccination<br />
programme based on the Ma5 and 4/91 serotypes. Avian Pathology 37<br />
(5) : 487-493.<br />
0.01<br />
Broilers; Broiler breeders; Layer; Backyard<br />
Figure 1: Evolutionary relationships
S3 - P - 17<br />
APPLICATION OF REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION REAL-TIME PCR TO DETECT THE<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS GENOME<br />
Nikolai Salnikov, Helena Nikitina, Sodnom Tsybanov, Denis Kolbasov<br />
National research institute for veterinary virology and microbiology <strong>of</strong> Russia, Pokrov, Russia<br />
Schmallenberg disease, virus, PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
The disease Schmallenberg was registered among cattle, sheep<br />
and goats in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Britain, France,<br />
Italy, Luxembourg and Spain (3,4). The Schmallenberg virus is<br />
a member <strong>of</strong> the genus Orthobunyavirus family Bunyaviridae.<br />
Established the pathogenicity <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus for<br />
sheep, goats and cattle. Clinical signs <strong>of</strong> the disease in<br />
cattle include fever, drop in milk yield (50%), loss <strong>of</strong> appetite and<br />
sometimes diarrhea. If an adult ewe or heifer was infected in the<br />
early stages <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, the fetal infection can occur,<br />
leading to serious consequences: abortion, birth <strong>of</strong> premature or<br />
dead fetuses and lambs, goats and calves with<br />
various malformations. At detection in animals the characteristic<br />
clinical signs <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg disease carry out<br />
activities for virus isolation in cell cultures, detection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virus genome by PCR and antibodies to it in the neutralization<br />
test (1,2). The aim <strong>of</strong> this work was the development the test -<br />
system to detect the Schmallenberg virus genome by real-time<br />
quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
In our work the referent RNA samples <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus<br />
were used. Also we used the different strains <strong>of</strong> such viruses, as<br />
Nairobi sheep disease, Akabane, Rift Valley fever and<br />
bluetongue. Extraction <strong>of</strong> viral RNA was performed using "Trizol''<br />
(Trizol Reagent, Life Technology, USA). RT-qPCR was carried<br />
out on the thermocycler Rotor Gene 6000 (Corbett Research,<br />
Australia). Cloning <strong>of</strong> the amplified Schmallenberg virus<br />
genome's fragment was performed using the "Ins TAclone PCR<br />
cloning kit"(Fermentas, Latvia). The synthesis <strong>of</strong> RNA from<br />
cloned DNA inserts was performed using the kit "RiboMAX Large<br />
Scale RNA Production System T7" (Promega, USA).<br />
preparations <strong>of</strong> heterologous viruses and RNA extracted from the<br />
intact samples has not been received positive results. This<br />
proves the specificity <strong>of</strong> the primers and the probe included in<br />
the test - system. The analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the developed test -<br />
system is 7,178*10^5 RNA copies / mkl.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank for the referent RNA samples <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg<br />
virus Dr. Martin Beer and Dr. Bernd H<strong>of</strong>fman, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Germany.<br />
References<br />
1. Gibbens, N. Schmallenberg virus: a novel viral disease in northern<br />
Europe. <strong>2012</strong>. Vet. Rec.17: 58.<br />
2. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier<br />
H, et al. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg. Infect.<br />
Dis. <strong>2012</strong> Mar.<br />
3. Latest posts on Pro Med-mail. International society for infectious<br />
diseases, 2011-<strong>2012</strong>. http://www.promedmail.org.<br />
4. Weekly disease information/WAHID Interface/OIE, 2011-<strong>2012</strong>.-<br />
http://www.oie.int.<br />
Results<br />
With order to select primers the available in Gen Bank nucleotide<br />
sequences <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg virus Genome were analyzed using<br />
the programs Bio Edit 7.0 and Oligo 6.0. As a result a pair <strong>of</strong> the<br />
primers flanking the fragment <strong>of</strong> 130 bp within the gene N <strong>of</strong><br />
Schmallenberg virus was designed. For detection <strong>of</strong> amplification<br />
products in real-time the probe Taq-man, which contains at the<br />
5'-end the fluorophores HEX and at the 3'-end – quencher BHQ2<br />
was designed. Analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the method was<br />
determined using in vitro transcripts synthesized on the template<br />
<strong>of</strong> the recombinant plasmid with the Schmallenberg virus<br />
genome fragment's insertion. Ten-fold serial dilutions <strong>of</strong> in<br />
vitro transcribed RNA (<strong>of</strong> known concentration) were used to<br />
determine analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> RT-q PCR. The limit <strong>of</strong><br />
sensitivity considered the maximum dilution at which a positive<br />
result was registered.<br />
The calculated value <strong>of</strong> analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> RT-PCR in realtime<br />
was 7.178*10^5 RNA copies /mkl, which corresponds<br />
to 3,698*10^6 copies <strong>of</strong> RNA per reaction. To evaluate<br />
the specificity <strong>of</strong> the test - system the RNA samples <strong>of</strong> Nairobi<br />
sheep disease, Akabane, Rift Valley fever and bluetongue<br />
viruses were examined. We also examined the RNA samples<br />
extracted from the intact cultures <strong>of</strong> kidney cells <strong>of</strong> antelope,<br />
BHK-21/13, CV-1, blood samples and organs from intact animals<br />
(goats, sheep, cattle, mice). With any <strong>of</strong> the examined RNA<br />
samples has not been a received positive result in RT-qPCR. By<br />
using the developed method over 500 blood samples and 15<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> placenta and meconium from clinically<br />
healthy pregnant heifers imported from Germany and the<br />
Netherlands in 2011-<strong>2012</strong> in the farms <strong>of</strong> Nizhny Novgorod,<br />
Moscow and Kaluga regions were examined. This also was<br />
not obtained positive results.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The designed test -system is suitable to detect the<br />
Schmallenberg virus genome in blood samples and<br />
organs <strong>of</strong> sheep and cattle. In the investigation <strong>of</strong> RNA
S3 - P - 18<br />
PREVALENCE OF COXIELLA BURNETII ANTIBODIES IN SHEEP AND GOATS IN FINLAND<br />
Teresa Skrzypczak 1 , Tiina Autio 2 , Jaana Seppänen 1 , Sinikka Pelkonen 1,2<br />
1<br />
Finnish Food Safety Authority, Evira, Research and Laboratory Department, Veterinary Bacteriology, Helsinki, Finland<br />
2<br />
Finnish Food Safety Authority, Evira, Research and Laboratory Department, Veterinary Bacteriology, Kuopio, Finland<br />
Coxiella burnetii, Q-fever, sheep, goat, prevalence<br />
Introduction<br />
Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular pathogen which causes a<br />
highly contagious zoonotic disease, Q fever. The infection is<br />
endemic worldwide and has been detected in several European<br />
countries in goat, sheep and cattle populations (2, 4). The<br />
transmission <strong>of</strong> the infection from goats to humans has caused<br />
severe zoonotic epidemic in the Netherlands in the last few years<br />
(3, 5). In Finland, C. burnetii infection was detected for the first<br />
time in 2008 in a dairy herd. Seropositive animals were found in<br />
ELISA tests made for export control. A succeeding PCR test <strong>of</strong><br />
the bulk tank milk sample was positive for C. burnetii. No clinical<br />
signs <strong>of</strong> Q fever were observed in the herd. A later performed<br />
nationwide prevalence study <strong>of</strong> dairy herds in 2009 indicated that<br />
the prevalence <strong>of</strong> C. burnetii infection in cattle population was<br />
extremely low. Only two out <strong>of</strong> 1238 tested herds were<br />
seropositive (1). In this study we assessed the prevalence <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
burnetii antibodies in sheep and goat populations in Finland.<br />
References<br />
1. Autio, T., Skrzypczak, T., Pohjanvirta, T., Pelkonen, S. 2010.<br />
Low prevalence <strong>of</strong> Coxiella burnetii (Q-fever) antibodies in dairy herds in<br />
Finland. 25th World Buiatrcis Congress, Chile.<br />
2. Guatteo, R., Seegers, H., Taurel, A.-F., Joly, A., Beaudeau, F. 2011.<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Coxiella burnetii infection in domestic ruminants: A critical<br />
review. Vet. Microbiol. 149:1-16.<br />
3. Roest, H.I.J., Tilburg, J.J.H.C., van Der Hoek, W., Vellema, P., van Zijderveld,<br />
F.G., Klaassen, C.H.W., Raoult, D. The Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands:<br />
history, onset, response and reflection. 2011. Epidemiol. Infect. 139: 1–12.<br />
4. Ryan, E, Kirby, M, Clegg, T, Collins, D,M. 2011. Seroprevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
Coxiella burnetii antibodies in sheep and goats in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Ireland.<br />
Vet. Record, 169, 280b<br />
5. Schimmer,B, Luttikholt, S, Hautvast, J.L.A, Graat, E.A.M, Vellema, P,<br />
van Duynhoven, Y.T.H.P.2011. Seroprevalence and risk factors <strong>of</strong> Q fever<br />
in goats on commercial dairy goat farms in the Netherlands, 2009-2010.<br />
BMC Vet. Res. 2011,7:81<br />
Materials & methods<br />
We used serum samples collected for sheep Meadia-Visna-virus<br />
(MV) and goat Caprine arthritis-encephalitis-virus (CAE)<br />
surveillance study in year 2010. According to the legislation, all<br />
herds having 20 eves or more must be tested for MV and CEA.<br />
The smaller herds remained out <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />
In total, we obtained 8545 ovine sera from 246 farms and 819<br />
caprine sera from 24 farms. From the herds with less than 50<br />
animals, all animals were included in the study. From herds with<br />
more than 50 animals, 50 sera were chosen randomly. The<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> individual herds were combined into pools <strong>of</strong> ten<br />
samples. Altogether 740 pooled samples from sheep were<br />
tested. Caprine samples were mainly studied individually, except<br />
from one herd with more than 200 animals. In case <strong>of</strong> a positive<br />
test result, all samples from a positive pool were tested<br />
separately.<br />
The samples were tested using CHEKIT Q-fever antibody ELISAtest<br />
(IDEXX, Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland).<br />
Results<br />
All the tested samples were negative for C. burnetii antibodies.<br />
The negative results indicate that the seroprevalence <strong>of</strong> C.<br />
burnetii in the ovine population was less than 0.0004 % and<br />
caprine population less than 0.0048 %, with 95 % confidence.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This was the first time that Q fever antibodies were analyzed in<br />
sheep and goats in Finland. All tested farms and animals were<br />
negative. There were altogether 129 091 sheep on 1349 farms<br />
and 4 890 goat on 165 farms at the time <strong>of</strong> sampling in 2010. The<br />
sampling covered 6.6 % <strong>of</strong> sheep and 16.7 % <strong>of</strong> goat populations<br />
in the country, and represented 18.2% <strong>of</strong> ovine and 14.5% <strong>of</strong><br />
caprine farms situated in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country. The study<br />
shows extremely low prevalence <strong>of</strong> C. burnetii infection in sheep<br />
and goats in Finland. The finding is in line with the detected low<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> the infection in dairy cattle herds in 2009 (1). The<br />
Nordic climate, small herd size <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat farms and<br />
small density <strong>of</strong> these farms may have accounted for the<br />
favorable situation. We conclude that C. burnetii infection is very<br />
rare in domestic ruminants in Finland.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We thank Riikka Mäkinen for excellent technical assistance.
S3 - P - 19<br />
DETECTION OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS IN BOVINE SEMEN BY ONE-STEP REAL-TIME RT-PCR<br />
Remco Dijkman 1 , Jet Mars 1 , Gerard Wellenberg 1<br />
1<br />
Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Affiliation Institute name, Department name, City, Country<br />
Schmallenberg virus, semen, real-time PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
For the detection <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in serum,<br />
tissues and body fluids, a real-time PCR, based on the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific regions <strong>of</strong> the L-segment <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus,<br />
was developed (1). Recently, two real-time PCR methods, based<br />
on the detection <strong>of</strong> S-segment sequences, were developed too.<br />
However, these PCR methods have not been validated for<br />
semen samples.<br />
In this study, we have examined whether the L-PCR, S3-PCR<br />
and an “in-house” S-PCR were suitable for the detection <strong>of</strong> SBV<br />
in bovine semen.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Besides the L1 and S3 PCR, which were developed by FLI<br />
(Germany), we also used an “in-house” pan-orthobunyavirus S-<br />
PCR (OBV-S PCR) real-time PCR targetting the orthobunyavirus<br />
S-segment for the detection <strong>of</strong> SBV in bovine semen samples.<br />
RNA was extracted with the AM1836 extraction kit (Life<br />
Technologies) using the MagMAX express 96 system (Life<br />
Technologies). The AgPath-ID one-step RT-PCR kit (Life<br />
Technologies) was used for amplification. PCR amplification was<br />
performed on a ABI7500 sequence detection system from<br />
Applied Biosystems (Life Technologies).<br />
The validation <strong>of</strong> the three PCR tests was based on the<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> the detection limit (lowest detectable amount <strong>of</strong><br />
SBV per mL semen) for undiluted (fresh semen) and diluted<br />
semen (straw) samples.<br />
Therefore, ten-fold dilutions from a Schmallenberg virus stock<br />
solution with a known titer (10 4.9 TCID50/mL) were used for<br />
spiking semen samples and subsequently used for analyses.<br />
This study was also focused on spiking experiments to determine<br />
the negative influences <strong>of</strong> inhibitory compounds in semen<br />
samples as they may lead to false-negative results.<br />
As it is unknown whether SBV is excreted by semen, and natural<br />
SBV infected semen samples were not available, spiking<br />
experiments have been performed with undiluted (fresh semen)<br />
and diluted semen (straw) samples. Undiluted semen from 8<br />
different bulls (bulls A t / H) and diluted semen from 14 bulls<br />
(bulls I t / m V) were used. The recovery <strong>of</strong> the SBV in undiluted<br />
and diluted semen samples was determined by PCR and<br />
compared with the results <strong>of</strong> control samples.<br />
Results<br />
In silico analyses showed that the primers and probes <strong>of</strong> the L-<br />
and S3-PCR are specific for SBV, and that the selected primers<br />
and probe <strong>of</strong> the OBV S-PCR recognize conserved regions within<br />
the S-segment <strong>of</strong> SBV, also present in other orthobunyaviruses.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the detection limits <strong>of</strong> the three real-time PCR<br />
methods are reported in Table 1.<br />
straws were comparable or to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 4 Ct-values higher<br />
than the Ct-value <strong>of</strong> the Positive Reference sample (PBS matrix).<br />
The semen samples without spiking were negative in all three<br />
PCR methods (Figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Ct-values <strong>of</strong> 1:3 diluted (fresh) semen and diluted<br />
semen (straws)spiked with SBV as obtained by L-, S3- and the<br />
OBV-S PCR.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This validation study showed that the L-, the S3-, and the OBV-S<br />
PCR are able to detect SBV in 1:3 diluted fresh semen and<br />
diluted (straw) semen samples. The detection limits <strong>of</strong> the S3-<br />
and the OBV-S PCR are lower compared to the detection limit <strong>of</strong><br />
the L-PCR.<br />
In addition, the spiking experiments, to examine the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
inhibitory compounds in bovine semen samples, showed that no<br />
negative influences were recorded in 1:3 diluted semen and in<br />
diluted semen (straw) samples. Therefore, fresh semen needs to<br />
be diluted prior to the RNA-extraction and semen straws can be<br />
examined by PCR without further dilution.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> an internal control, to check for inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
matrix, was not examined in this study, but can be the scope for<br />
further validation.<br />
As fresh semen can be diluted 1:3, and semen in straws are<br />
diluted approximately between 1:20 and 1:30, the screening <strong>of</strong><br />
fresh semen is more sensitive than straws.<br />
It might be useful to use the OBV-S PCR as a general screening<br />
PCR, and the S3-PCR can be used as a screening and/or<br />
confirmatory PCR.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier<br />
H, et al. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis<br />
(epub).<br />
Table 1: Detection limits <strong>of</strong> the three real-time SBV PCR methods<br />
Test method<br />
Detection limit (TCID50/ml)<br />
Undiluted semen Diluted semen<br />
Straws<br />
L-PCR 10 1.9 10 0.9<br />
S3-PCR 10 -0.1 10 -1.1<br />
OBV-S PCR 10 -0.1 10 -0.1<br />
Results showed that inhibitory effects were recorded for undiluted<br />
(fresh) semen, while no inhibitory effects were recorded by PCR<br />
when these semen samples were 1:3 pre-diluted. Ct-values <strong>of</strong><br />
the 1:3 diluted fresh semen samples and the diluted semen
S3 - P - 20<br />
INTERFERON-GAMMA ASSAY TO DIAGNOSE Mycobacterium bovis INFECTION IN PIGS<br />
Michele Pesciaroli 1 , Piera Mazzone 2 , Cinzia Marianelli 1 , Sara Corneli 2 , Miriam Russo 3 , Vincenzo Aronica 3 , Michele<br />
Fiasconaro 3 , Massimo Biagetti 2 , Marcella Ciullo 2 , Monica Cagiola 2 , Paolo Pasquali 1 and Vincenzo Di Marco 3<br />
1 Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria e Sicurezza Alimentare, Italy,<br />
2 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, Italy, 3 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia,Italy<br />
Mycobacterium bovis, pig, γ-IFN test<br />
Introduction<br />
Different species <strong>of</strong> animals are susceptible to Mycobacterium<br />
bovis (MB), the causative agent <strong>of</strong> bovine tuberculosis (bTB) and<br />
may represent both "reservoir" <strong>of</strong> infection or "spillover host".<br />
Swine, until a few years ago, was considered only a spillover host<br />
(1). In areas where MB is still present in cattle which share the<br />
pasture with the pig population, the marginal role attributed to the<br />
pig in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> infection <strong>of</strong> MB is strongly questioned.<br />
When high rates <strong>of</strong> infection are observed also in pigs, this<br />
species may play the role <strong>of</strong> true "reservoir" (2). The diagnostic<br />
procedures used to identify in vivo MB infected cattle, including<br />
skin test (IDT) and γ-interferon (γ-IFN) test, are also adopted in<br />
other animal species (3,4) but their application in pigs has not<br />
been completely evaluated. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />
calculate the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the γ-IFN test in pigs infected with MB,<br />
compared with the results <strong>of</strong> post-mortem diagnostic tests<br />
(pathological examination and culture).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Animals: The Black Sicilian Pig is a traditional Italian breed native<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Nebrodi Park (Sicily). These pigs are usually reared in freerange<br />
farms and share the pasture with cattle. In this area the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> TB in cattle ranges from 5.36% to 8.58% (data<br />
2010 Italian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health). For the study, 100 Blacks Sicilian<br />
Pigs, coming from farms with bTB positive cases (2), aging from<br />
12 to 24 months, were randomly sampled at the abattoir <strong>of</strong> Mirto<br />
(Sicily). In addition, 15 healthy pigs from tuberculosis-free herds<br />
were sampled at the same abattoir and used to set up the<br />
method and as negative controls.<br />
Protocol and dose response curves <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ: Samples <strong>of</strong> whole<br />
blood <strong>of</strong> the 15 healthy pigs were stimulated with 5μl/ml <strong>of</strong><br />
Pokeweed mitogen (PWM) (Sigma-Aldrich, MS, USA) and 5μl/ml<br />
<strong>of</strong> "Phosphate Buffered Saline" (0.01M PBS, pH 7.2). The<br />
production <strong>of</strong> γ-IFN by lymphocytes was evaluated using a<br />
sandwich ELISA (Porcine IFN-gamma Quantikine ELISA Kit,<br />
R&D Systems, Mn, USA) on the supernatant collected after 24<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> incubation at 37 °C at 5% CO 2 . The stimulation with PBS<br />
did not induce any production <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ; on the contrary, the blood<br />
samples stimulated with PWM, showed an average production <strong>of</strong><br />
γ-IFN <strong>of</strong> 2633 µg/ml, with a standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 688.2 µg/ml.<br />
The samples stimulated with PWM, with a value below 1250<br />
µg/ml (calculated as mean - 2 SD), were excluded from the<br />
analysis because considered unresponsive.<br />
γ-IFN test: Heparinized blood samples, taken at the<br />
slaughterhouse, were dispensed in aliquots <strong>of</strong> 1.5 ml in 24-well<br />
plates (Costar, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). The<br />
lymphocyte stimulation was performed in duplicate: PBS, for the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the basal value <strong>of</strong> γ-IFN (N); PWM (5 μl/ml); bovine<br />
PPD (10μg/ml); avian PPD (10μg/ml). The PPDs (purified protein<br />
derivatives), used in the experiment, were both produced by the<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico dell’Umbria e delle Marche (IZSUM),<br />
according to the <strong>of</strong>ficial protocols (EC Regulation N o 1226/2002).<br />
The values obtained from each sample, expressed in units <strong>of</strong><br />
Optical Density (OD), were interpreted as reported below.<br />
Table 1. Possible outcomes following lymphocytes stimulation<br />
with avian and bovine PPDs (OD 450 nm )<br />
AOD & BOD < 2N<br />
Negative<br />
AOD or BOD > 2N<br />
AOD 2 N Positive for M. avium<br />
BOD 2 N Positive for M. bovis<br />
BOD/AOD 0,9 Positive for M. avium<br />
AOD & BOD > 2N BOD/AOD 1,1 Positive for M. bovis<br />
0.9 BOD/AOD 1,1 Doubt<br />
N = baseline value (value obtained with PBS only)<br />
AOD = value obtained after stimulation with avian PPD<br />
BOD = value obtained after stimulation with bovine PPD<br />
Pathological examination (EAP): The macroscopic examination<br />
was conducted at the slaughterhouse in accordance with<br />
conventional inspection methods. Samples <strong>of</strong> lymph nodes (LN)<br />
from the head (mandibular, retropharyngeal, parotid LN), the<br />
thorax (bronchial LN), and the abdomen (hepatic, gastric,<br />
intestinal LN) were also collected from all the pigs.<br />
Microbiology: Bacterial culture for MB was performed according<br />
to the Italian Ministerial Decree (DM 592/1995) on each lymph<br />
node. Suspect colonies, testing positive for acid fast staining,<br />
were further identified through bio-molecular techniques (3).<br />
Results<br />
Of the 100 pigs involved in the study, 2 subjects did not respond<br />
to stimulation with PWM; these animals were excluded from the<br />
final evaluation. EAP and culture identified respectively 26<br />
(26,5% ) and 19 (19,4%) positive pigs . γ–IFN assay identified 22<br />
positive pigs among the 26 with tubercular lesions and 15 among<br />
the 19 with positive bacterial culture (Table 2). The sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
the test, assuming as gold standard the traditional tests, resulted<br />
84,6% (95% CI 52.6-100%) and 78,9% (95% CI 44.8-100%)<br />
respectively.<br />
Table 2: Comparison between the results obtained in γ-IFN test,<br />
EAP and culture for M. bovis. P: Positive N: Negative.<br />
Lesion<br />
Culture for M. bovis<br />
P N P N<br />
P 22 4 15 11<br />
γ- IFN<br />
N 4 68 4 68<br />
Total 26 72 19 79<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our results demonstrate the circulation, in the Nebrodi Park, <strong>of</strong><br />
MB also in the swine population that inhabits this area (2),<br />
supporting the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> an epidemiological role <strong>of</strong> the Black<br />
Sicilian pig as a significant reservoir <strong>of</strong> infection. Therefore, the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> future control strategies also in this species is<br />
needed. In this perspective, γ-IFN test could represent a good<br />
tool for intra vitam diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bTB in pigs. The study results<br />
show, in general, an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> agreement between<br />
traditional diagnostic tests and γ-IFN test. In particular, as shown<br />
in Table 2, there is a better agreement with the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
tubercular lesions rather than with the MB isolation. This feature<br />
can be explained with a generally low sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the cultural<br />
test (4). Animals with positive reaction at γ-IFN test showing<br />
neither macroscopic lesions nor MB infections could be assumed<br />
as false positive. However, they could also be ascribed to the<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> this immunoassay to identify recently infected<br />
subjects with still unapparent lesions at least during the routine<br />
post-mortem inspection. These preliminary results encourage us<br />
to plan future research to optimize γ-IFN test performance in<br />
swine. This study was founded by the Research Project <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Seventh Framework Program “Strategies for the eradication <strong>of</strong><br />
bovine tuberculosis” (Contract Number 212414 – Acronyms TB-<br />
STEP).<br />
References<br />
1. O’Reilly L. M., Daborn C. J., (1995) The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium<br />
bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tubercle and lung disease.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>ficial journal <strong>of</strong> the International Union against Tuberculosis and<br />
Lung Disease, 76 Suppl. 1: 1-46.<br />
2. V. Di Marco, P. Mazzone, MT. Capucchio, MB. Boniotti, V. Aronica, M.<br />
Russo, M. Fiasconaro, N. Cifani, S. Corneli, E. Biasibetti, M. Biagetti, ML.<br />
Pacciarini, M. Cagiola, P. Pasquali, and C. Marianelli. “Epidemiological<br />
Significance <strong>of</strong> the Domestic Black Pig (Sus scr<strong>of</strong>a) in Maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
Bovine Tuberculosis in Sicily” J Clin Microbiol. <strong>2012</strong> Apr;50(4):1209-18.<br />
Epub <strong>2012</strong> Feb 8.<br />
3. OIE Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals<br />
2010 Chapter 2.4.7. Bovine tuberculosis (Version adopted in May 2009)<br />
4. Boadella M., Lyashchenko K., Greenwald R., Esfandiari J., Jaroso R.,<br />
Carta T., Garrido J. M., Vicente J., de la Fuente J., Gortázar C. (2011)<br />
Serologic tests for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and<br />
Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar<br />
(Sus scr<strong>of</strong>a scr<strong>of</strong>a). J Vet Diagn Invest. 23 (1): 77-83
S3 - P - 21<br />
USE OF EXPERIMENTAL JOHNIN IN THE GAMMA-INTERFERON TEST<br />
IN CATTLE INFECTED BY Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: PRELIMINARY DATA<br />
Piera Mazzone 1 , Nicoletta Vitale 2 , Matteo Ricchi 3 , Sara Corneli 1 , Piermario Mangili 1 , Paola Papa 1 , Massimo<br />
Biagetti 1 , Carla Sebastiani 1 , Angela Caporali 1 , Alex Raber 4 , Giovanni Pezzotti 1 , Norma Arrigoni 3 , Monica Cagiola 1<br />
1<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, Italy<br />
2<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta,Italy<br />
3<br />
Centro di<br />
Referenza Nazionale per la Paratubercolosi - Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia ed Emilia Romagna,Italy 4 Prionics AG Switzerland<br />
Paratuberculosis, γ-IFN test, Johnin<br />
Introduction<br />
The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Paratuberculosis (PTB), due to Mycobacterium<br />
avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), is usually based on<br />
serology and fecal culture, detecting advanced stages <strong>of</strong><br />
infection. The Gamma Interferon (γ-IFN) test, used for antemortem<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bovine Tuberculosis (bTB), due to<br />
Mycobacterium bovis (MB), together with Skin Test (IDT) (1),<br />
may be used as additional test also for PTB diagnosis. Moreover,<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> an immunological test that, at the same time,<br />
may distinguish between animals infected with MB or MAP and<br />
enables an early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PTB, could support the control <strong>of</strong><br />
both diseases. The γ-IFN test detects the amount <strong>of</strong> cytokine<br />
produced by T lymphocytes <strong>of</strong> infected animals, in response to a<br />
stimulation carried out with the traditional bovine and avian<br />
purified protein derivatives, respectively extracted by MB (PPDB)<br />
and by M. avium (PPDA). Similarly, the Johnin PPD (PPDJ) is<br />
obtained from a culture <strong>of</strong> MAP (2). In this preliminary study, in<br />
order to achieve an early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PTB, 3 new PPDJs were<br />
produced, used in the γ-IFN test and compared to classic PPDs,<br />
avoiding false positive reactions for bTB.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Johnin production: 20 Italian MAP strains, candidates to be used<br />
for production <strong>of</strong> PPDJs, were genotyped by amplification <strong>of</strong> Mini<br />
and Microsatellite loci (3). Two strains were selected: the one<br />
with the most and the one with the least frequent genetic pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
observed in Italy, identified as Strain A and Strain B respectively.<br />
The strain ATCC 19698 (Strain C) was used for the third batch <strong>of</strong><br />
Johnin. The three MAP strains were cultured for 4 months at<br />
37°C in Watson-Reid modified broth, and then the bottles were<br />
autoclaved at 100°C for 3 hours. Cells were removed and the<br />
proteins extracted by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. The<br />
precipitate was then washed and dissolved in phosphate<br />
phenolate buffer and glycerine, with a final protein content <strong>of</strong> 1<br />
mg/ml, as required for PPDB by the Decree <strong>of</strong> the Italian Ministry<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health June, 26 th 1981 and Regulation (EC) N o . 1226/2002.<br />
Field trials: 24 IDT tuberculosis negative bovines from 3 bTB<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially free (OF) dairy herds were selected. In these herds,<br />
clinical cases <strong>of</strong> PTB had been reported. The animals were<br />
subjected in parallel to ELISA test for PTB (IDVet), PCR (4) and<br />
culture (2) for MAP from faeces. Animals with positive results in<br />
at least one <strong>of</strong> the tests were considered positive for PTB. Of the<br />
24 animals, 16 were positive to at least one <strong>of</strong> the tests and 8<br />
were negative for all.<br />
In vitro stimulation and γ-IFN test: The heparinized blood<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> the 24 bovines were dispensed in aliquots <strong>of</strong> 1 ml and<br />
stimulated respectively with: "Phosphate Buffered Saline" (PBS<br />
0.01 M, pH 7.2), considered as blank; 30 μg <strong>of</strong> PPDB and 30 μg<br />
<strong>of</strong> PPDA (AgriQuality Australia Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia); 10 μg<br />
<strong>of</strong> Italian PPDB and 10 μg <strong>of</strong> Italian PPDA; three experimental<br />
PPDJ (strains A, B, C) with three different dilutions (1:5, 1:10 and<br />
1:15). The evaluation <strong>of</strong> γ-IFN was performed with the Elisa kit<br />
BOVIGAM ® in the plasma collected after 24 hours <strong>of</strong> incubation.<br />
The samples have been considered positive when the Optical<br />
Density value (OD450 nm) was, at least, twice the OD <strong>of</strong> the<br />
blank. To evaluate the "dilution factor" <strong>of</strong> Johnin (1:5, 1:10; 1:15)<br />
and the "strain factor" (A, B, C), a 2-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />
using the procedure Proc GLM <strong>of</strong> SAS ®<br />
v9.2 s<strong>of</strong>tware was<br />
conducted. The relative specificity <strong>of</strong> PPDB and PPDJ in the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bTB (bTB OF farms) was calculated using the IDT<br />
as Gold Standard (GS). The relative sensitivity <strong>of</strong> PPDJ in the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PTB was calculated using as GS positivity in ELISA<br />
and/or PCR and/or Bacteriological test.<br />
Results<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the lymphocyte stimulation with the different PPDs<br />
are shown in Figure 1. The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance showed<br />
statistically significant differences between the mean OD 450 <strong>of</strong><br />
PPDJ for both the "dilution factor" <strong>of</strong> Johnin (F test = 28.44,<br />
p
S3 – P - 22<br />
COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF FIVE DIFFERENT IMMUNOASSAYS TO DETECT SPECIFIC<br />
ANTIBODIES AGAINST EMERGING ATYPICAL BOVINE PESTIVIRUS<br />
Magdalena Larska 1,2 , Lihong Liu 3 , Mirosław P. Polak 1 , Stefan Alenius 2 , Åse Uttenthal 5<br />
1 National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Virology Department, Puławy, Poland, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Sciences, Swedish University <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden; 3 Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Immunology and Parasitology (VIP), National Veterinary Institute (SVA),<br />
Uppsala, Sweden; 5 National Veterinary Institute, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Lindholm, Denmark<br />
Atypical bovine pestivirus, antibodies, ELISA, Microsphere-based immunoassay (MIA), diagnosis<br />
Introduction<br />
Atypical bovine pestiviruses are a group <strong>of</strong> viruses which together<br />
with two bovine viral diarrhoea virus species (BVDV-1 and<br />
BVDV-2), border disease virus (BDV) and classical swine fever<br />
virus (CSFV) comprise the Pestivirus genus <strong>of</strong> the Flaviviridae<br />
family. The group was previously referred to as Hobi-like<br />
pestiviruses from the precursor strain isolated from Brazilian<br />
foetal bovine serum (FBS) (2). Increasing evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
intercontinental spread <strong>of</strong> the atypical pestivirus raised the<br />
discussion over the emergence <strong>of</strong> the new BVDV species and<br />
prompts the search for the tools supporting testing and control<br />
programs. Serological test has not been validated to detect<br />
specific antibodies against those pestiviruses yet.<br />
0.0001) with ρ values between 0.82 for b-ELISA-2 and 0.92 for i-<br />
ELISA-2.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study was conducted using 140 sera from calves<br />
experimentally inoculated with Asian atypical pestivirus<br />
Th/04_KhonKaen strain (Group A); BVDV-1a strain Horton 916<br />
(Group B), with a mixture <strong>of</strong> both viruses (Group C) and<br />
uninfected controls (1). Serum samples were collected from all<br />
animals on 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 days post inoculation (dpi).<br />
Five serological tests including two commercial indirect BVDV<br />
ELISAs (i-ELISA-1 and 2), two blocking BVDV ELISAs (b-ELISA-<br />
1 and 2) and newly developed microsphere immunoassay (MIA)<br />
(3) using recombinant E rns protein <strong>of</strong> Th/04_KhonKaen pestivirus<br />
were evaluated for their robustness, sensitivity, specificity and<br />
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using virus neutralization<br />
test (VNT) as ’gold’ standard.<br />
Results<br />
According to VNT using homologous to inoculum viruses the<br />
animals from groups A and B started to seroconvert against<br />
homologous viruses at 14 dpi, while Group C seroconverted<br />
independently to both viruses before 14 dpi. The earliest<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies in the Group A was observed at 14 dpi in<br />
the i-ELISA-1, b-ELISA-2, MIA. Using i-ELISA-2 the antibodies<br />
were detected first in two animals from Group A at 21 dpi and in<br />
all animals from 28 dpi. Detection <strong>of</strong> specific antibodies in Group<br />
A was the most delayed to the end <strong>of</strong> experiment in b-ELISA-2.<br />
100% sensitivity in detecting Th/04_KhonKaen virus specific<br />
antibodies in Group A was obtained by b-ELISA-2 and MIA, while<br />
their specificities were 82% and 91%, respectively. Other assays<br />
were characterised by 100% specificity, however the sensitivity<br />
varied from only 25% for b-ELISA-2 and BVDV-1 VNT to 83% for<br />
i-ELISA-1 when testing calves from Group A. Most assays<br />
detected 100% <strong>of</strong> seropositive animals from Group B which were<br />
categorised as positive in BVDV-1 VNT, except for b-ELISA-1<br />
which had only 72% sensitivity. The specificity <strong>of</strong> the tests was<br />
lower in respect to VNT test, possibly due to the lower sensitivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the latter. The AUC for the methods detecting atypical<br />
pestivirus antibodies were the highest reaching 0.93 for MIA and<br />
the lowest (0.62) for b-ELISA-1 and BVDV-1 VNT. Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
positive-negative cut-<strong>of</strong>f values by ROC analysis showed that<br />
optimizing the recommended by manufacturer or SOP values<br />
could increase senstitivities and specificities <strong>of</strong> some<br />
immunoassays. Two tests: MIA and b-ELISA-2 showed more<br />
flexible cut-<strong>of</strong>fs which allowed the values to fluctuate within a<br />
wider range without influencing their performance.<br />
The values <strong>of</strong> all ELISA tests were significantly correlated with<br />
the neutralizing titres against atypical pestivirus and BVDV-1 (P <<br />
0.0001) when tested by the Spearman rank correlation<br />
coefficients (ρ). Anti-Th/04_KhonKaen antibody titres showed the<br />
comparable correlations with all ELISAs tested, with the highest<br />
correlation to b-ELISA-2 (ρ= 0.84). The lowest correlation was<br />
observed between Th/04_KhonKaen antibody titres and VNT<br />
using BVDV-1 strain (ρ= 0.65). The correlations between BVDV-1<br />
antibody titres and ELISA results were also significant (P <<br />
Figure 1: Comparison <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp)<br />
(A) and AUC (area under ROC curve) values (B) <strong>of</strong> all<br />
immunoassays.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results have shown that all the tested immunoassays were<br />
suitable to detect antibodies raised in calves inoculated with<br />
atypical pestivirus, however only some could be used in the early<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> the seroconversion. Two ELISAs (i-ELISA-1 and b-<br />
ELISA-2) and novel MIA were considered to be superior (even in<br />
respect to BVDV-1 VNT) for the routine detection <strong>of</strong> atypical<br />
bovine pestivirus antibodies in cattle. The analysis <strong>of</strong> optimal cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
values suggested that cautious result interpretation using the<br />
recommended cut-<strong>of</strong>f values diminish the possibility <strong>of</strong> obtaining<br />
false results. Here the focus is on early detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies,<br />
as the immune system will initially produce IgM antibodies there<br />
is a natural preference <strong>of</strong> assays that are independent <strong>of</strong> IgG.<br />
Therefore, despite the conservative nature <strong>of</strong> NS3 protein,<br />
blocking b-ELISA-1 performed with the lowest sensitivity and the<br />
seroconversion appeared at the latest. Development <strong>of</strong> MIA<br />
using microspheres conjugated with mAbs against atypical<br />
pestivirus E rns protein resulted in high sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong><br />
detection <strong>of</strong> antibodies against homologous virus comparable to<br />
VNT, which however did not promise much possibility for the<br />
pestivirus specific discrimination as it detected BVDV-1<br />
antibodies equally efficiently.<br />
References<br />
1. Larska et al., <strong>2012</strong>. Kinetics <strong>of</strong> single and dual infection <strong>of</strong> calves with an<br />
Asian atypical bovine pestivirus and a highly virulent strain <strong>of</strong> bovine viral<br />
diarrhoea virus 1.Comp Immunol Microbiol Infec Dis. {Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print]<br />
2. Schirrmeier et al., 2004. Genetic and antigenic characterization <strong>of</strong> an<br />
atypical pestivirus isolate, a putative member <strong>of</strong> a novel pestivirus species.<br />
J Gen Virol. 85, 3647–3652<br />
3. Xia et al., 2010. A microsphere-based immunoassay for rapid and<br />
sensitive detection <strong>of</strong> bovine viral diarrhoea virus antibodies. J Virol<br />
Methods 168, 18-21.
S3 - P - 23<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS (SBV) IN POLAND – PRELIMINARY RESULTS<br />
Magdalena Larska, Mirosław P. Polak, Jan F. Żmudziński<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Virology Department, Puławy, Poland<br />
Schmallenberg virus, testing, Culicoides<br />
Introduction<br />
SBV was first detected in Germany by metagenomics analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
samples collected from sick cows from the city <strong>of</strong> Schmallenberg<br />
in the autumn 2011 (1). Until now over 4000 cases were<br />
described in Northern Europe. Because Poland is a neighbouring<br />
country to the area covered by SBV epidemic, the risk <strong>of</strong> further<br />
spread to our territory is possible. European SBV is a reassortant<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses belonging to<br />
Orthobunyavirus <strong>of</strong> the family Bunyaviridae which emerged<br />
around a decade ago in Japan (2). The source <strong>of</strong> SBV infection in<br />
Europe is not know, however the virus is known to spread by<br />
Culicoides sp. biting midges, similarly to bluetongue virus (BTV),<br />
what may suggest climate change or involvement <strong>of</strong> redistribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> vectors as a possible cause.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Tissue and blood samples from fifteen animals from two cattle<br />
and one goat herds from different parts <strong>of</strong> Poland were submitted<br />
to NVRI by district <strong>of</strong>ficial veterinarians under the suspicion <strong>of</strong><br />
Schmallenberg virus infection. The clinical signs included<br />
abortions (no malformation observed), fever, depression and in<br />
older cows respiratory disorders with sudden death. Mortality in<br />
older cows was later confirmed to occur due to antibiotic resistant<br />
Mannheimia haemolytica infection. Additionally, 36 pools <strong>of</strong><br />
midges including C. obsoletus, C. punctatus, C. chiropterus and<br />
C. pulicaris from the border zone with Germany and from northeastern<br />
part <strong>of</strong> Poland collected in September/October 2011<br />
were tested. Midge pools were homogenised in Ribolyzer tubes<br />
(Hybaid, UK) containing 0.6g beads with TRI Reagent (Sigma<br />
Adrich) for 80 sec. at 5m/sec. speed. Viral RNA was extracted<br />
using TRI Reagent. Real time RT-PCR was performed according<br />
to Friedrich-Loeffler Institut (FLI) protocol using primers and<br />
probes specific to S and L segment <strong>of</strong> SBV genome with β-actin<br />
as internal control. AgPath-ID One-Step RT-PCR Reagents<br />
(Ambion-Applied Biosystems) were used and the reaction was<br />
performed in StepOnePlus machine (Applied Biosystems). SBV<br />
RNA standard used as positive control and to determine<br />
sensitivity/specificity was acquired from FLI.<br />
Figure 2: Standard curve (correlation <strong>of</strong> Ct value and log dilution<br />
<strong>of</strong> SBV RNA standard)<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
More samples have to be tested to verify the possibility <strong>of</strong> SBV<br />
introduction into Polish herds. However, Polish population <strong>of</strong><br />
sheep and goats is scarce (approx. 250 000 and 130 000,<br />
respectively), the disease may already be present in the country,<br />
but SBV is not detected because <strong>of</strong> its mostly asymptomatic<br />
course in cattle. More research including some seroprevalence<br />
studies is planned.<br />
References<br />
1. H<strong>of</strong>fmann et al., <strong>2012</strong>. Novel orthobunyavirus in Cattle, Europe, 2011.<br />
Emerg Infect Dis. 18, :469-7<br />
2. Yanase et al., <strong>2012</strong>. Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and<br />
Shamonda viruses <strong>of</strong> the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for<br />
their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus. Arch Virol. [Epub ahead<br />
<strong>of</strong> print]<br />
Results<br />
All samples were negative for the presence <strong>of</strong> SBV genetic<br />
material. In all animal and insect samples amplification <strong>of</strong> β-actin<br />
was positive with Ct values ranging from 25 to 34. Specificity <strong>of</strong><br />
PCR products was confirmed by sequencing. The specificity <strong>of</strong><br />
the assays was 100%, while sensitivity was comparable to FLI<br />
(detection limit at 10 -7<br />
SBV RNA). The efficiency determined<br />
using the standard RNA was approx. 98% with the mean slope <strong>of</strong><br />
3.38.<br />
Figure 1: Amplification plots <strong>of</strong> SBV RNA standard with segment<br />
S specific primers and TaqMan probe.
S3 - P - 24<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRUS NEUTRALISATION TEST TO DETECT ANTIBODIES AGAINST<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS AND FIRST RESULTS IN SUSPECT AND INFECTED HERDS<br />
W.L.A. Loeffen 1 , S. Quak 1 , E. de Boer-Luijtze 1 , W.H.M. van der Poel 1 , R. Bouwstra 2 , R. Maas 1<br />
1<br />
Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Lelystad, The Netherland.<br />
2<br />
Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, Crisis Management and<br />
Diagnostics, Lelystad, The Netherland.<br />
Schmallenberg, VNT, sensitivity, specificity<br />
Introduction<br />
On the 18th <strong>of</strong> November 2011, a new Orthobunya virus was<br />
reported to be found in Germany (3). This virus was closely<br />
related to Shamonda-, Aino- and Akabane-virus, which all belong<br />
to the Simbu serogroup <strong>of</strong> the genus Orthobunyavirus, family<br />
Bunyaviridae (1). The virus, provisionally called Schmallenberg<br />
virus (SBV), has since been associated with clinical signs <strong>of</strong><br />
decreased milk production, watery diarrhoea, fever and<br />
congenital malformations (3,4,5).<br />
To determine the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the disease and carry out<br />
epidemiological studies, there was a need for a reliable and<br />
robust serological assay. A virus neutralisation test (VNT) was<br />
developed, as this also allows for a (semi)quantitative detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibodies against the virus. An initial validation (specificity,<br />
sensitivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and robustness) was<br />
carried out and the test was used in suspect (congenital<br />
malformation, no positive RT-PCR) and infected herds (positive<br />
RT-PCR).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The VNT was carried out in flat bottomed 96 well micro titre<br />
plates. Serum samples were inactivated for 30 min at 56°C and<br />
from a starting dilution <strong>of</strong> 1:4, two-fold dilutions were made.<br />
Subsequently 500 TCID 50 <strong>of</strong> virus was added to each well. Serum<br />
and virus were pre-incubated at 37°C for 1 to 2 hours to allow<br />
neutralisation <strong>of</strong> the virus. Thereafter, 20,000 cells (VERO cells)<br />
per well were added. Plates were then incubated for 5 days at<br />
37°C and under 5% CO2.<br />
After 5 days, the plates were stained with amido black and read<br />
macroscopically. Wells with 25-100% staining were considered to<br />
have no or limited CPE only. Wells with less than 25% staining<br />
were considered to have extensive or full CPE. In each dilution<br />
series the last well with no or limited CPE was identified and the<br />
sample was assigned a titre that was the reciprocal <strong>of</strong> the dilution<br />
in that well. Control samples were included and a back titration <strong>of</strong><br />
the virus was carried out for each test run.<br />
Initially, 351 blood samples (160 sheep, 191 cattle) from noninfected<br />
animals were tested in the final version <strong>of</strong> the assay.<br />
These samples originated from the Netherlands, from the period<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2000-2010, before the introduction <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus.<br />
They were used to set the initial cut-<strong>of</strong>f value in the assay.<br />
Subsequently, 366 samples from suspect herds (being herds in<br />
which congenital malformations were observed, with no<br />
confirmation in the RT-PCR), and infected herds (herds where<br />
the infection was confirmed by RT-PCR).<br />
Results<br />
In serum samples from non-infected sheep, a higher background<br />
was seen than in sera from non-infected cattle (figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Distribution <strong>of</strong> titres in non-infected sheep (n=160) and<br />
cattle (n=191).<br />
Based on testing 160 sheep and 191 cows, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f values<br />
were set at a titre <strong>of</strong> 16 for sheep and 8 for cattle. Given this cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
value, a specificity <strong>of</strong> 99.4% in sheep and 99.5% in cattle was<br />
estimated.<br />
Ninety-two percent <strong>of</strong> the cattle and 94% <strong>of</strong> the sheep from<br />
suspect and infected herds scored positive in the VNT. In sheep<br />
no titres <strong>of</strong> 8 and in cattle no titres <strong>of</strong> 4 were observed, thus<br />
clearly separating the peak <strong>of</strong> the positive samples from the peak<br />
<strong>of</strong> the negative samples (figure 2). This again corresponds to a<br />
cut-<strong>of</strong>f value <strong>of</strong> 16 and 8 respectively from sheep and cattle, as<br />
determined already by testing serum samples from non-infected<br />
animals. Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay is therefore at least 92% and<br />
94% in cattle and sheep respectively, assuming the worst case<br />
scenario that all were seropositive in reality. However, the clear<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> the negative and positive peak suggests that the<br />
sensitivity for both species is close to 100%.<br />
Figure 2: Distribution <strong>of</strong> titres in goats, sheep and cattle from<br />
suspect (in utero malformations, RT-PCR negative), and infected<br />
herds (infection confirmed by RT-PCR).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
A very robust VNT was developed with a very high specificity and<br />
sensitivity, both close to 100%, in sheep and cattle. The assay<br />
was shown to be highly repeatable and reproducible (results not<br />
shown). The VNT is easy to perform and can be read<br />
macroscopically, as a result <strong>of</strong> the amido black staining. With the<br />
current, optimized protocol, this staining results most <strong>of</strong> the times<br />
in a very sharp transition between wells with and without CPE.<br />
This makes it easy and very fast to read the plates, with a high<br />
reliability and reproducibility.<br />
In suspect and infected herds more than 90% <strong>of</strong> the sheep and<br />
cattle tested seropositive, suggesting that within herds with<br />
congenital malformations, the infection is wide spread with a high<br />
within-herd seroprevalence. High seroprevalences, both on a<br />
regional level, but also within herds, with and without obvious<br />
clinical signs, are not uncommon for viruses related to SBV. A<br />
very high overall seroprevalence <strong>of</strong> 70% in cattle was recently<br />
also reported in the Netherlands, using this VNT (2).<br />
References<br />
1. Causey OR, Kemp GE, Causey CE, Lee VH. 1972. Ann Trop Med<br />
Parasitol 66: 357-62.<br />
2. Elbers ARW, Loeffen WLA, Quak S, et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Emerg Infect Dis.<br />
3. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Emerg Infect Dis.<br />
4. Muskens J, Smolenaars AJG, Van der Poel WHM, et al. <strong>2012</strong> Tijdschr<br />
Diergeneeskd. 137: 112-5.<br />
5 .Van den Brom R, Luttikholt SJM, Lievaart-Peteron K,et al. <strong>2012</strong><br />
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 137: 106-11.
S3 - P - 25<br />
VIRAL DIAGNOSIS USING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS<br />
David J. Everest and W. A. Cooley<br />
1<br />
Central Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK<br />
Most viruses are very small and visualisation by Transmission<br />
Electron Microscopy (TEM) has provided a major contribution in<br />
the discovery and detection <strong>of</strong> viral infections. The AHVLA’s Bioimaging<br />
unit provides a rapid viral diagnostic service, analysing<br />
fresh unfixed scab, lesion, wart and faecal materials by TEM.<br />
Species range from domestic farm animals, to wildlife, marine<br />
mammals and Zoo animals, covering red squirrels to Elephants.<br />
Historically, this form <strong>of</strong> microscopy has been a key application in<br />
the diagnosis and surveillance <strong>of</strong> several wildlife viral infections.<br />
These have included Squirrel pox and adenovirus, both<br />
contributing to the decline <strong>of</strong> the UK Red Squirrel, calicivirus from<br />
Rabbits and Hares, the causative agent <strong>of</strong> rabbit haemorrhagic<br />
disease and pox viruses in various marine mammal species.
S3 - P - 26<br />
DETECTION OF EQUINE FOAMY VIRUS INFECTIONS IN HORSES<br />
Magdalena Materniak, Jacek Kuzmak<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Equine foamy virus, diagnostics, PCR, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
Foamy viruses (FVs) are the least known complex retroviruses.<br />
FVs infections are highly prevalent among several animal species<br />
including non-human primates (chimpanzees, gorillas, etc.), cats<br />
and cattle. Another foamy virus was isolated from horses (Equine<br />
foamy virus - EFV) (1). Similarly to other FVs, EFV shows<br />
characteristic ultrastructure and susceptibility to infect large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cell lines. Furthermore, its molecular analysis exhibits<br />
genome organization typical for other known foamy viruses, but<br />
its sequence shows the highest similarity to bovine foamy virus.<br />
Although the first isolation <strong>of</strong> EFV was reported over ten years<br />
ago, still nothing is known about the prevalence <strong>of</strong> EFV infections<br />
in horses. Therefore we aimed to develop diagnostic tools and<br />
apply them to investigate the EFV infection in horses from<br />
Poland.<br />
References<br />
1. Tobaly-Tapiero J., Bittoun P., Neves M., Guillemin M.-C., Lecellier Ch.-<br />
H., Puvion-Dutilleul F., Gicquel B., Zientara S., Giron M.-L., The H. de,<br />
Saϊb A. (2000). Isolation and characterization <strong>of</strong> an eqiune foamy virus. J.<br />
Virol., 74, 4064-4073.<br />
2. Romen F., Backes P., Materniak M., Sting R., Vahlenkamp T. W., Riebe<br />
R., Pawlita M., Kuzmak J., Löchelt M. (2007). Serological detection<br />
systems for identification <strong>of</strong> cows shedding bovine foamy virus via milk.<br />
Virology, 364, 123-131.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Blood samples were collected from 175 horses (4 -18 years old),<br />
including common breeds, Hucul ponies and randomly selected<br />
samples from slaughtered horses. Semi-nested PCR was<br />
developed and applied to detect EFV DNA in DNA extracted from<br />
peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs). Selected primers flanked 275<br />
bp fragment within pol gene, the most conservative EFV region.<br />
GST ELISA with BFV specific Gag-GST fusion protein (2) was<br />
used for detection <strong>of</strong> foamy virus specific antibodies in horse<br />
serum samples. To confirm ELISA results immunoblotting with<br />
antigen prepared from Cf2Th/BFV 100 cells was applied.<br />
Additionally, attempts were made to isolate EFV from peripheral<br />
blood leukocytes <strong>of</strong> PCR positive animals by co-cultivation with<br />
BHK-21 and RK-13 cells.<br />
Results<br />
12.5% <strong>of</strong> samples were positive in semi-nested PCR. Specificity<br />
<strong>of</strong> amplified fragments was confirmed by sequencing and parwise<br />
identity <strong>of</strong> particular sequences ranged from 95.3% to 98.3%,<br />
when compared to EFV reference sequence (GenBank Acc. No.<br />
NC_002201). In contrast, almost 19% <strong>of</strong> the samples showed<br />
seroreactivity to BFV Gag protein. Most <strong>of</strong> PCR positive samples<br />
were detected in Hucul ponies, while only several in samples<br />
randomly collected from slaughtered animals. All attempts to<br />
isolate EFV from PBLs <strong>of</strong> PCR positive horses failed.<br />
Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> results.<br />
Origin<br />
PCR (+) ELISA (+)<br />
samples samples<br />
Hucul ponies 15 14 0<br />
Saddle-horses 3 6 0<br />
Slaughtered<br />
horses<br />
TOTAL<br />
4<br />
22<br />
13<br />
33<br />
Co-cultivation (+)<br />
samples<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This study presents the first report on prevalence <strong>of</strong> EFV infection<br />
in horses. The discordance between PCR and serological results<br />
can be due to application <strong>of</strong> BFV specific tests instead <strong>of</strong> EFV<br />
specific serological assays. Therefore further studies are<br />
essential to develop EFV specific serological tests to confirm<br />
obtained results. Nevertheless, our study clearly shows that EFV<br />
infections are present among horses in Poland.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ali Saïb and Dr. Joelle<br />
Tobaly-Tapiero for providing EFV positive DNA and serum<br />
controls.<br />
0<br />
0
Poster presentations<br />
“New techniques in bacteriology,<br />
parasitology and pathology”<br />
(4 th session)
S4 - P - 01<br />
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS<br />
STRAINS IN A NATIONAL PARATUBERCULOSIS CONTROL PROGRAM<br />
Michaela Altmann 1 , Eva Sodoma 1 , Petra Möbius 2 , Michael Dünser 1<br />
1<br />
Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Austria Agency for Health and Food Safety, Linz, Austria<br />
2<br />
Institute for Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Jena, Germany<br />
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, RFLP, MIRU, VNTR, paratuberculosis<br />
Introduction<br />
In 2006 Austria started a national paratuberculosis (PTB) control<br />
programme based on government regulation which affects cattle,<br />
sheep, goat and farmed deer. PTB was declared a notifiable<br />
disease, so animals showing clinical signs have to be tested for<br />
MAP at the national reference laboratory. MAP strains isolated<br />
from different herds between 2006 and 2011 and strains from red<br />
deer were selected for molecular characterization.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
165 MAP field strains from 164 clinically diseased ruminants<br />
were analysed by IS900 RFLP with two restriction enzymes<br />
(BstEII, PstI) and MIRU-VNTR at 8 genomic loci (MIRU292,X3;<br />
VNTR25,47,3,7,10,32) according to MÖBIUS et al. (2008) and<br />
THIBAULT et al. (2007). These field strains included 141 MAP<br />
cattle isolates from 73 farms and different breeds (Angus,<br />
Aquitaine Blonde, Austrian Brown Mountain, Fleckvieh<br />
(Simmental), Tyrolean Grey Mountain, Holstein Friesian, Jersey,<br />
Limousin, Murbodner, Piemontese, Red Friesian, Danish<br />
Melkrace), 19 isolates from goat and 4 isolates from red deer.<br />
Results<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> RFLP and MIRU-VNTR analysis allowed a<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> 18 MAP strain types classified AT1 to AT18.<br />
Detailed results and frequency in animals and herds are shown in<br />
Table 1. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> MAP strain types in different cattle<br />
breeds, goats and red deer is listed in Table 2.<br />
Table 1: RFLP and MIRU-VNTR results <strong>of</strong> 165 MAP field strains<br />
(INMV: INRA NOUZILLY MIRU-VNTR)<br />
RFLP INMV<br />
MIRU VNTR<br />
Σ<br />
292,X3 25,47,3,7,10,32 animals<br />
AT1 C1P1 1 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 16<br />
AT2 C1P1 2 3,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 59<br />
AT3 C18 2 3,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 18<br />
PnewIII<br />
AT4 C1P1 17 3,1 3,3,2,2,2,8 8<br />
AT5 C18 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 4<br />
PnewII<br />
AT6 C1 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 9<br />
PnewV<br />
AT7 C1P7 1 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
AT8 C1P1 5 4,2 3,3,2,2,1,8 2<br />
AT9 C18 1 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 15<br />
PnewIII<br />
AT10 C1P1 new 2,2 5,2,2,2,2,6 1<br />
AT11 CnewI 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
PnewIII<br />
AT12 C18P1 17 3,1 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
AT13 C28 1 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
PnewI<br />
AT14 C18P1 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 5<br />
AT15 C1 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
PnewIV<br />
AT16 C1P1 12 2,2 5,2,2,2,2,8 3<br />
AT17 CnewIII 2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 19<br />
PnewIV<br />
AT18 C14<br />
PnewIII<br />
2 4,2 3,3,2,2,2,8 1<br />
Table 2: The occurrence <strong>of</strong> MAP strain types AT1-18<br />
Breed<br />
AT MAP strain type (number)<br />
Angus 2(3)<br />
Aquitaine Blonde 5(2),6(3)<br />
Austrian Braun Mountain 1(1),2(3),6(1)<br />
Fleckvieh 1(2),2(10),3(1),4(5),5(1),8(2)<br />
Austrian Grey Mountain 1(2)<br />
Holstein Friesian 1(1),2(9),5(1),6(3),16(3)<br />
Jersey 2(3),3(3),7(1),15(1)<br />
Limousin 1(5),2(25),3(12),4(3),9(15),11(1)<br />
13(1),14(5),18(1)<br />
Murbodner 3(1),12(1)<br />
Piemontese 1(4)<br />
Red Friesian 2(2),3(1),6(1),<br />
Danish Melkrace 2(1),6(1),10(1)<br />
Goat<br />
Red Deer<br />
18(19)<br />
1(1), 2(3)<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Despite the fact that 18 different MAP types were detected in a<br />
comparatively large and diverse sample selection, 42% <strong>of</strong> all<br />
isolates were classified as MAP type AT2 (RFLP C1-P1; INMV<br />
2). MAP type AT2 was found in 8 <strong>of</strong> 12 PTB affected cattle<br />
breeds and in 2 <strong>of</strong> 4 isolates from red deer and is therefore the<br />
predominating MAP type strain in Austria. 9 new RFLP patterns<br />
and 1 new INMV pr<strong>of</strong>ile could be determined within the 165<br />
analysed field strains. Some unique occurring strains showed<br />
association with certain cattle breeds, goat and red deer (Table<br />
2). This is the first study carried out in Austria providing data<br />
about MAP strain types on a national scale. Additional<br />
information about routes <strong>of</strong> transmission between herds and the<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> PTB in Austria could be achieved by using the<br />
national cattle data base and the results <strong>of</strong> MAP typing.<br />
References<br />
1. MÖBIUS, P., LUYVEN, G., HOTZEL, H., KÖHLER, H. (2008): High<br />
Genetic Diversity among Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis<br />
Strains from German Cattle Herds Shown by Combination <strong>of</strong> IS900<br />
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis and Mycobacterial<br />
Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number Tandem Repeat Typing. J.<br />
Clin. Microbiology, 46, 972-980<br />
2. THIBAULT, V., GRAYON, M., BOSCHIROLI, M. L., HUBBANS, C.,<br />
OVERDUIN, P., STEVENSON, K., GUTIERREZ, M.C., SUPPLY, P., BIET,<br />
F. (2007): New Variable Number Tandem Repeat Markers for Typing<br />
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and M. avium Strains:<br />
Comparison with IS900 and IS1245 Restriction Fragment Length<br />
Polymorphism Typing. J. Clin. Microbiology, 45, 2404-2410
S4 - P - 02<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF<br />
LEPTOSPIRA BORGPETERSENII SEROVAR HARDJO IN URINE AND KIDNEY<br />
Zbigniew Arent 1 , Caroline Frizzell 2 , Colm Gilmore 1 , William Ellis 1<br />
1<br />
OIE Leptospirosis Reference Laboratory, Veterinary Sciences Division, AFBI, Belfast, Northern Ireland<br />
2<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University <strong>of</strong> Belfast<br />
Leptospira, leptospirosis, real-time PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo is the most common<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis in cattle throughout the world. Infection <strong>of</strong><br />
cattle with Hardjo can cause abortion, stillbirth, birth <strong>of</strong> weak<br />
calves and decreased milk production (1, 2). Infected animals<br />
can act as lifelong renal carriers without clinical signs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disease (3) and shed live organisms over a long period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
(4).<br />
There is no satisfactory method available for the rapid<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> carrier animals. Culturing <strong>of</strong> leptospires is the<br />
most definitive test. However this is possible only on fresh<br />
samples where viable leptospires are present. . PCR assays<br />
have the potential to detect both viable and non-viable<br />
leptospires and in recent years, several real-time PCR assays<br />
have been described. Levett et al. (5) developed a real-time<br />
assay using SYBR green chemistry, in which the target was the<br />
gene for the outer-membrane protein LipL32. Expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
LipL32 gene is a unique virulence factor for pathogenic<br />
leptospires. LipL32 is an outer membrane lipoprotein that is<br />
conserved genetically and immunologically in pathogenic<br />
leptospires. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most abundant proteins in Leptospira.<br />
In this study we developed and validated a TaqMan PCR using<br />
novel primers which target a 200 bp fragment <strong>of</strong> the LipL32 gene.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Eight animals that had no evidence <strong>of</strong> exposure to serovar Hardjo<br />
were experimentally infected with L. borgpetersenii serovar<br />
Hardjo type Bovis via conjunctival instillation <strong>of</strong> 2.5 x 10 6<br />
organisms on 3 consecutive days. A total <strong>of</strong> 8 urine samples<br />
were collected from each animal prior to and at intervals up to 40<br />
days after infection. In addition , 24 culture negative urine<br />
samples obtained from herds with no evidence <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis<br />
and 72 kidney samples collected post mortem from animals with<br />
serological evidence <strong>of</strong> Leptospira serovar Hardjo exposure were<br />
used in the study. All samples were cultured using Leptospira<br />
semisolid Tween 80/40 medium and biphasic culture medium<br />
with different variants <strong>of</strong> inhibitory substance addition.<br />
DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures and kidneys using the<br />
QIAamp DNA Mini kits (Qiagen) and from urines using the<br />
QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the<br />
manufacturer’s recommendations.<br />
The TaqMan assay to amplify a 200 bp fragment <strong>of</strong> the LipL32<br />
gene was optimized (primer/probe concentration, annealing<br />
temperature and incubation time with the QuantiTec Probe PCR<br />
Kit (Qiagen) for urine samples and kidney according to the<br />
manufacturer’s instructions. As a control for PCR inhibitors,<br />
specific primers and probe were designed to a housekeeping<br />
gene, β-actin, in cattle for kidney samples but in case <strong>of</strong> urine<br />
samples TaqMan Exogenous Internal Positive Control reagent<br />
(Applied Biosystems) was added to the amplification reaction.<br />
The limit <strong>of</strong> detection was ten template copies. Thirty two urine<br />
samples were used to determined diagnostic specificity (DSp). All<br />
<strong>of</strong> them were culture negative. Also thirty two urine samples and<br />
20 kidney samples that contained serovar Hardjo, as determined<br />
by culture were used to determine diagnostic sensitivity (DSe).<br />
The table below gives the results.<br />
Table 1: Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong> the LipL32 realtime<br />
PCR.<br />
Sensitivity % Specificity %<br />
Urine 84.4 90.6<br />
Kidney 95.0 Not tested<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This study evaluated the real-time PCR assay targeting LipL32<br />
gene for detection <strong>of</strong> Leptospira spp in bovine kidney and urine.<br />
The results indicate that the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the diagnostic assay<br />
varies for kidney and urines. Presumably, some false negative<br />
results were caused by substances in the urine that inhibited<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> the DNA, as the exogenous internal positive control<br />
did not show inhibition <strong>of</strong> the amplification reaction.<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> the difficulties associated with isolation <strong>of</strong> leptospires<br />
and the fact that serology does not imitate the carrier or shedding<br />
status, the LipL32 real-time PCR assay may be used as method<br />
for the detection <strong>of</strong> pathogenic leptospires in bovine urine and<br />
kidney samples<br />
References<br />
1. Ellis, W.A., (1984) Bovine Leptospirosis in the tropics: Prevalence,<br />
Pathogenesis and Control. Pre Vet Med 2: 411-421.<br />
2. Ellis, W.A., O’Brien, J.J., Bryson, D.G., Mackie, D.P., (1985) Bovine<br />
leptospirosis: some clinical features <strong>of</strong> serovar Hardjo infection. Vet Rec<br />
117: 101-104.<br />
3. Ellis, W.A., Songer, J.G., Montgomery, J., Cassells, J.A., (1986)<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo in the genital and<br />
urinary tracts <strong>of</strong> non-pregnant cattle. Vet Rec 118: 11-13.<br />
4. Ellis, W.A., (1994) Leptospirosis as a cause <strong>of</strong> reproductive failure. Vet<br />
Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 10: 463-478.<br />
5. Levett, P.N., Morey R.E., Galloway R.L., Turner D.E., Steigerwalt A.G.,<br />
Mayer L.W. (2005) Detection <strong>of</strong> pathogenic leptospires by real-time<br />
quantitative PCR. J Med Microbiol 54: 45-49.<br />
The real time PCR was tested against a panel <strong>of</strong> bacterial<br />
species known to be ruminant pathogens to determine the<br />
analytical specificity <strong>of</strong> the assay. The analytical sensitivity was<br />
calculated using a dilution series <strong>of</strong> target DNA. A genome size <strong>of</strong><br />
3.9 Mb was used to determine the genomic equivalent (GE) per<br />
microlitre <strong>of</strong> the purified DNA. The diagnostic sensitivity and<br />
specificity <strong>of</strong> the assay was determined by testing samples with<br />
only known culture status.<br />
Results<br />
The LipL32 target was amplified from 35 strains tested which<br />
belonged to 6 pathogenic leptospiral species (L.interrogans,<br />
L.borgpetersenil, L.kirschneri, L. santarosai, L.noguchii, L. weilii).<br />
The non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa, intermediate L. fainei and<br />
other 20 bovine pathogens included were not amplified.
S4 - P - 03<br />
USEFULNESS OF LIVE/DEAD BACLIGHT BACTERIAL VIABILITY KIT TYPE 7007 MOLECULAR<br />
PROBES FOR EVALUATION OF VIABILITY ASCARIS SP., TOXOCARA SP. AND TRICHURIS SP.<br />
EGGS ISOLATED FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE<br />
Joanna Dąbrowska, Maciej Kochanowski, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Stojecki, Jolanta Zdybel, Tomasz Cencek<br />
National Veterinary Research Insitute, Departament <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Disease, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Viability, sludge, Ascaris, staining, fluorescence<br />
Introduction<br />
Sewage sludge and treated sewage from wastewater treatment<br />
plant despite the use <strong>of</strong> new ways <strong>of</strong> decontamination may<br />
contain live parasite eggs, which after entering the watering<br />
place, drinking water or into the fields as fertilizer can be a source<br />
<strong>of</strong> infection <strong>of</strong> humans and animals. For this reason, there is duty<br />
to monitor the safety <strong>of</strong> these substances, including the obligation<br />
to parasitological research. According the current rules<br />
parasitological examination includes detection <strong>of</strong> the Ascaris<br />
suum, Trichuris sp., and Toxocara sp. eggs and assess their<br />
viability.The assessment <strong>of</strong> their viability based only on the<br />
incubation and observation <strong>of</strong> isolated egg is long, time- and<br />
labour-consiuming and imprecise.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop sensitive and less labourintensive<br />
methods for assessing viability <strong>of</strong> Ascaris suum,<br />
Toxocara sp. and Trichuris sp. eggs in sewage sludge and<br />
organic fertilizers.<br />
Material & methods<br />
Dehydrated sludge obtained from municipal wastewater<br />
treatment plant. Eggs <strong>of</strong> parasites isolated from the female<br />
nematode Ascaris suum, Trichuris ovis and Toxocara canis were<br />
used in the investigation (parasites were obtained from the<br />
intestines <strong>of</strong> animals killed in a slaughterhouse or excreted with<br />
faeces). Some <strong>of</strong> the eggs were inactivated by incubation in a<br />
water bath in 60 0 C for 30min. Eggs viability was confirmed by<br />
incubation in a moist chamber at 27 0 C. For differential staining <strong>of</strong><br />
live and dead eggs were used diagnostic kit Live/Dead Bacterial<br />
<strong>of</strong> Molecular Probes, type 7007.<br />
The study was conducted in two experiments.<br />
Experiment 1. Live and inactivated parasite eggs were<br />
suspended in distilled water in separate test tubes. Then the<br />
eggs were stained using a set <strong>of</strong> Live/Dead Bacterial Kit 7007<br />
using the ratio: 1 ml <strong>of</strong> eggs suspended in water and 6 ml dye<br />
mixture (3 ml dye SYTO 9 and 3 ml <strong>of</strong> dye propiodium iodide).<br />
After thorough mixing, the suspension was incubated for 15 min<br />
at room temperature in the dark. Then it filtered through a<br />
polycarbonate filter, and so prepared sample coated with<br />
glycerol. The sample was viewed under a fluorescence<br />
microscope with suitable filters for wavelength settings excitation<br />
470 nm, emission 490 at the area (magnifcation 400x).<br />
Experiment 2. Live and dead eggs were added to separate<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> dewatered sewage sludge. Then the eggs were<br />
isolated from samples using own methods which is the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> flotation and sedimentation methods (3) which is<br />
the combination <strong>of</strong> flotation and sedimentation methods. Before<br />
filtering stage <strong>of</strong> the match after flotation and sedimentation <strong>of</strong><br />
sludge contained in the eggs <strong>of</strong> parasites were stained with<br />
Live/Dead Bacterial, type 7007 Molecular Probes. In the<br />
experiment used the proportion: in 20 ml <strong>of</strong> sludge was added 8<br />
ml mixture <strong>of</strong> dyes (4 ml SYTO 9 and 4 ml <strong>of</strong> dye propidium<br />
iodide). Then the sample was proceeded as in experiment 1.<br />
Results<br />
Experiment 1. The significant differences in staining <strong>of</strong> live and<br />
dead eggs <strong>of</strong> all three species <strong>of</strong> parasites were obtained. Strong<br />
green color <strong>of</strong> the live eggs and red color <strong>of</strong> inactivated eggs<br />
were observed under the fluorescence microscope (Figure 1).<br />
Experiment 2. With regard to the presence <strong>of</strong> organic matter<br />
derived from sewage sludge generated staining <strong>of</strong> eggs was<br />
similar as in experiment 1 although the colours were less<br />
intensive. Moreover, live eggs <strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp. took a green or<br />
blue than in experiment 1. In addition, live eggs <strong>of</strong> Toxocara sp.<br />
took a green or blue colour. Exemplary stained live and dead<br />
eggs obtained from the sewage sludge observed in fluorescence<br />
compared with the same eggs in bright field are shown in Figure<br />
2.<br />
Fig. 1 Example <strong>of</strong> stained live and dead eggs <strong>of</strong> Trichuris sp.<br />
suspended in water observed in fluorescence microscope<br />
Live egg in water<br />
Dead egg in water<br />
Fig. 2 Stained live and dead eggs obtained from sewage sludge<br />
observed in fluorescence and bright field microscope<br />
Live eggs<br />
Dead eggs<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> observation<br />
Method <strong>of</strong> observation<br />
Bright field Fluorescence Bright field Fluorescence<br />
1 1<br />
2 2<br />
3 3<br />
As is apparent from the images the biggest difference in the<br />
staining <strong>of</strong> live and dead eggs were obtained for eggs A. suum<br />
(images 1) and Trichuris (images 3). Slightly weaker results were<br />
obtained when stained eggs <strong>of</strong> nematodes- Toxocara (some <strong>of</strong><br />
the living eggs stained in blue, and dead eggs were pink-blue,<br />
images 3).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
In most methods used in the world for parasitological<br />
examinations <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge eggs viability assessment is<br />
made by direct evaluation <strong>of</strong> the morphology <strong>of</strong> the eggs or<br />
observation and assessment their development during<br />
incubation. However, these methods are very subjective and in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> incubation very time and labour-consuming. Moreover<br />
the addition <strong>of</strong> glycerol (required to observe the microscopic filter<br />
papers) strongly inhibits the development <strong>of</strong> eggs. Diagnostic Kit<br />
Live/Dead Bacterial, the type <strong>of</strong> company Molecular Probes<br />
7007, composed <strong>of</strong> two components: SYTO 9 giving a green<br />
fluorescence, and propidium iodide (PI) - red fluorescence make<br />
use <strong>of</strong> a different ability <strong>of</strong> the two dyes to penetrate membrane<br />
<strong>of</strong> bacteria (1).<br />
The study showed that both dyes behave similarly also in relation<br />
to the cells <strong>of</strong> worm eggs. It was found that this method after the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> minor modifications by the nature <strong>of</strong> the test<br />
samples can be successfully used to distinguish between<br />
live and dead eggs <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites in sewage sludge. This<br />
method is less dependent from subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investigator and less time consuming than other methods used to<br />
assess the viability <strong>of</strong> eggs <strong>of</strong> parasitic nematodes.<br />
References<br />
1. Biggerstaff J.P., Le Puil M., Weidow B.L., Prater J., Glass K.,<br />
Radosevich M., White D. New methodology for viability testing in<br />
environmental samples. Mol Cell Probes. 2006 Apr;20(2):141-6.<br />
Epub 2006 Feb 14.<br />
2. Zdybel J, Karamon J., Cencek T.. Występowanie jaj nicieni<br />
pasożytniczych z rodzajow Ascaris, Trichuris i Toxocara<br />
w nawozach organicznych i organiczno-mineralnych oraz<br />
osadach ściekowych. Życie Weterynaryjne, rocznik 84 2009,<br />
rocznik 84
S4 - P - 04<br />
AUTOMATION OF A CAPTURE PROBE MAGNETIC BEAD DNA EXTRACTION METHOD FOR 3 GRAM<br />
FAECAL SAMPLES FROM RED FOX INTENDED FOR PCR-DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS<br />
MULTILOCULARIS<br />
Isaksson, M 1 , Hagström, Å 1 , Lukacs, M 2 , Holmberg, A 3 , Juremalm, M 1<br />
1<br />
National Veterinary Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
2<br />
Nordiag ASA, Research and development, Oslo, Norway<br />
3<br />
Nordiag AB, Research and development, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Automation, capture probe, DNA extraction, faecal samples, Echinococcus multilocularis<br />
Introduction<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the Echinococcus multilocularis (EM) surveillance in<br />
Sweden, 4000 red fox faecal samples will be collected and<br />
analyzed by PCR. This necessitates an automated DNA<br />
extraction method. Due to the heterogeneous presence <strong>of</strong> EMeggs<br />
in faeces, 3 grams <strong>of</strong> sample material is needed for the<br />
DNA extraction <strong>of</strong> this analysis. Earlier findings show that a<br />
capture probe magnetic bead extraction method (1) increases<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay compared to the standard egg-flotation<br />
and DNA extraction previously used at the National Veterinary<br />
Institute in Sweden (not published). In this study, we show how<br />
automation <strong>of</strong> the manual capture probe magnetic bead DNA<br />
extraction method capable <strong>of</strong> handling 3 grams <strong>of</strong> faeces per<br />
sample can increase the sample throughput capacity compared<br />
to manual extraction.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The robot used in this study is a Nordiag Bullet (Nordiag ASA). It<br />
is a flexible robot for microplate format and includes a gripper for<br />
plate transfers, a splittable 1ml eight channel pipette head,<br />
magnetic separation station, bar code capability and external<br />
waste. To be able to automate the large sample volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />
three grams <strong>of</strong> faeces in lysis buffer, 10ml 24-well deepwell<br />
plates were used together with two high power magnet stations.<br />
Results<br />
Essentially the automation consists <strong>of</strong> the five wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
magnetic beads and the magnetic pelleting between washes,<br />
eliminating the need to manually pipette the wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
samples. The robot can be loaded with up to 48 individual<br />
samples consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 grams <strong>of</strong> homogenized fox faeces in<br />
buffer with biotinylated hybridization probes hybridized to the<br />
target and attached to streptavidin coated magnetic beads. When<br />
the robot is finished, the target DNA is melted <strong>of</strong>f the probes and<br />
the probe/magnetic bead pellet is discarded. The manual capture<br />
probe magnetic bead DNA extraction method allows a laboratory<br />
technician to finish 12-20 samples in one day. The automation<br />
allows the same technician to finish 48 samples in one day, with<br />
time to do other things while the robot is working. 96 samples in<br />
one long day are also possible, but in this case with more or less<br />
100% hands on time, preparing the next batch <strong>of</strong> samples while<br />
the robot is processing the first batch.<br />
Tab 1. Throughput <strong>of</strong> samples per week per technician, time for<br />
weighing and division <strong>of</strong> samples not included.<br />
Samples per<br />
week per<br />
technician<br />
Manual extraction<br />
Automated extraction<br />
100 336<br />
Fig 1. The Nordiag Bullet robot used in the study<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The preparation <strong>of</strong> faecal samples before extraction, manual or<br />
automated, is difficult to automate. The samples have to be<br />
divided and put in the correct format tube or well before the<br />
extraction method itself can be initiated. Automating the washing<br />
steps <strong>of</strong> this method means that the sample throughput is<br />
increased enough for the hybridization capture probe method to<br />
be implemented as a routine, large scale DNA extraction method<br />
for the PCR detection <strong>of</strong> EM eggs in red fox faecal samples.<br />
Current work is aimed at modifying the automated capture probe<br />
DNA extraction method to be usable also for RNA targets in a<br />
standardized format, mixing RNA and DNA targets in the same<br />
robot run, or even in the same sample well. This would make the<br />
automated capture probe extraction method even more<br />
interesting for a number <strong>of</strong> difficult sample materials such as<br />
organ material, soil, sewage water etc.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This project is funded by the Swedish Civil Contingencies<br />
Agency.<br />
References<br />
1. Opsteegh, M, Langlelaar, M, Sprong, H, den Hartog, L, De Craeye, S,<br />
Bokken, G, Ajzenberg, D, Kijlstra, A, van der Giessen, J. 2010. Direct<br />
detection and genotyping <strong>of</strong> Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples using<br />
magnetic capture and PCR. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology,<br />
139(3), 193-201.
S4 - P - 05<br />
EVALUATION OF THREE ELISAs FOR DETECTING SERUM ANTIBODIES AGAINST MYCOPLASMA<br />
HYOPNEUMONIAE<br />
Martos-Raich, Alba, Porquet-Garanto, Lourdes, Rebordosa-Trigueros, Xavier<br />
HIPRA, 17170 Amer, Girona, Spain<br />
1 Keywords: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, ELISA, vaccinated/challenged animals<br />
Introduction<br />
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) is an important component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the so called Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC).<br />
Mhyo infection in pigs is usually monitored through serology. In<br />
this study, we compared three ELISAs developed to detect<br />
antibodies to Mhyo in swine serum. The main objectives <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study were to differentiate serum antibody pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> four groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> animals: non-challenged/vaccinated, challenged/vaccinated,<br />
challenged/non-vaccinated and non-challenged/non-vaccinated<br />
animals.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Seventy young piglets (10-day-old) serologically negative to<br />
Mhyo were divided into 7 groups <strong>of</strong> 10 animals each. Groups 1-5<br />
were vaccinated with 5 different commercial vaccines against<br />
enzootic pneumonia on D0, and D21, and subsequently<br />
challenged on D70 with Mhyo strain 3371. Groups 6 and 7 were<br />
used as non-vaccinated/challenged and non-vaccinated/nonchallenged<br />
control groups, respectively. Blood samples were<br />
taken from all animals at D0, D21, D42, D70 and D98. All<br />
samples were tested using the CIVTEST SUIS MHYO ELISA kit,<br />
a commercial indirect ELISA (ELISA-I), and a commercial<br />
competition ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody against the<br />
p74 (ELISA-C).<br />
Results<br />
All the kits showed good performance in the analysis <strong>of</strong> specificity<br />
(100%) (2). In regard to sensitivity, it varies depending on the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> sample analyzed: ELISA-C detected more positive<br />
samples from vaccinated animals (72,2%), followed by CIVTEST<br />
(41,67%) and the ELISA-I (14,81%). No differences in sensitivity<br />
were observed between ELISA-C and the CIVTEST (87,5% in<br />
both cases) in the samples from challenged animals (vaccinated<br />
and non-vaccinated); ELISA-I was less sensitive (50%) (Figure<br />
1). All three kits showed some common performance<br />
characteristics: they displayed maximum sensitivity at D42 after<br />
two doses <strong>of</strong> vaccine and sensitivity diminishes at D70. Also,<br />
sensitivity was lower when dealing with only challenged samples<br />
(2); in this case, CIVTEST and ELISA-C displayed the same<br />
sensitivity (33.3%) and detected all samples from<br />
vaccinated/challenged animals (100%); ELISA-I was the less<br />
sensitive (0% and 61.54%, respectively).<br />
Table 1. Kappa values obtained in the different comparisons.<br />
Comparison All Vacc. Chall.<br />
CIVTEST vs ELISA-C 0.7 0.4 1.0<br />
ELISA-I vs ELISA-I 0.54 0.39 0.25<br />
ELISA-C vs ELISA-I 0.34 0.12 0.25<br />
Figure 1. Quantitative representation <strong>of</strong> the Mhyo ELISA<br />
serology using three commercial kits. The results are shown as a<br />
mean (central point) and standard desviation (vertical bars).<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The most similar kits were the CIVTEST and the ELISA-C<br />
because both <strong>of</strong> them have a high sensitivity (Table 1). CIVTEST<br />
has better performance differentiating quantitatively samples from<br />
vaccinated animals and samples from vaccinated/challenged<br />
animals. The high sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the ELISA-C when detecting<br />
vaccination seems to make this test have more problems when<br />
distinguishing between samples from vaccinated animals and<br />
samples from vaccinated/challenged animals (Figure 1).<br />
References<br />
1. Ameri-Mahabadi, Mehrdad et al: 2055, J Vet Diagn Invest 17:61-65.<br />
2. Earlandson, KR et al: 2005, Journal <strong>of</strong> Swine Health and Production<br />
198:203.
S4 - P - 06<br />
SEPRION-COATED MICROCANTILEVER SENSORS FOR PRP SC DETECTION<br />
Daniela Meloni¹, Danilo Pitardi¹, Maria Mazza¹, Riccardo Castagna 2 , Ivan Ferrante 2 , Carlo Ricciardi 2 , Elena<br />
Bozzetta¹.<br />
¹Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Istopatologia e Test Rapidi, Turin, Italy;<br />
2<br />
Politecnico di Torino, Scienza dei Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica, Turin, Italy.<br />
Cantilever, Seprion, TSE, PrP sc detection<br />
Introduction<br />
The current state <strong>of</strong> technology to detect animal TSEs relies upon<br />
the post-mortem detection <strong>of</strong> prions, considering the EU trend in<br />
the age limit for testing [1] and in order to improve surveillance<br />
and food safety, new technologies should be developed to allow<br />
the ante mortem tests for PrP sc proteins. The new tests should be<br />
body fluids-based and performed on presymptomatic animals, but<br />
to be effective they would need to detect small amounts <strong>of</strong> PrP sc<br />
and to differentiate PrP c from PrP sc .<br />
Mechanical biosensors appear to be one <strong>of</strong> the most promising<br />
techniques for molecular diagnostics [2]. Dynamic-mode<br />
mechanical biosensors are oscillating devices with a resonance<br />
frequency that changes when molecules land on the cantilever.<br />
Thanks to the monitoring <strong>of</strong> different resonance modes over<br />
arrays <strong>of</strong> several cantilever-based microbalances, the selective<br />
identification and quantification <strong>of</strong> adsorbed mass <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong><br />
few picograms with very high precision was recently<br />
demonstrated [3].<br />
Here we propose the development <strong>of</strong> a biosensing platform for<br />
PrP sc<br />
detection based on microcantilever arrays coated with a<br />
selective polymer (Seprion from IDEXX Lab. Inc.).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Microcantilever arrays were fabricated in a clean room making<br />
use <strong>of</strong> standard microtechnologies such as KOH bulk etching,<br />
optical lithography and Reactive Ion Etching; they were dipped<br />
into coating solution for few minutes inside a laminar flow bench,<br />
washed with PBS and MilliQ water, and finally dried on a plate<br />
dryer.<br />
An optical lever setup is used to monitor cantilever resonance<br />
curve while vibrating in vacuum environment; a piezoactuator is<br />
employed for the excitation. We calculated the arithmetic mean<br />
and uncertainty <strong>of</strong> relative frequency deviation Δf/f over the<br />
modes for each cantilever, and then we used the “weighted<br />
average”method to have the best estimation <strong>of</strong> the true value Δf/f<br />
<strong>of</strong> the array [3].<br />
PrP sc<br />
was extracted from scrapie positive samples, brainstems<br />
were homogenised in lysis buffer and centrifuged at 22.000 g for<br />
20 minutes, the supernatant was collected and incubated with<br />
proteinase K (20 μg/ml) for 1 hour at 37° C. After centrifugation at<br />
215.000 g for 1 hour, the pellet was dissolved in distilled water.<br />
The coated arrays were incubated for 2h in a water-based<br />
solution containing pathologic PrP sc or simply water as negative<br />
control experiment (“blank”). Samples were then rinsed in DI<br />
water and finally dried in a steam <strong>of</strong> nitrogen.<br />
Fig. 2. Micro-cantilever array<br />
Fig3. PrP sc capture<br />
Results<br />
Microcantilever arrays were successfully treated with both 0.1%<br />
and 0.2% coating solution: the calculated mass surface densities<br />
seemed to be rather similar over the arrays and dilution, showing<br />
a good homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the functionalization procedure.<br />
Preliminary data exhibited a relevant negative relative frequency<br />
deviation Δf/f up to nearly 10 times higher respect to blank<br />
signals, showing that the polymer remained active in immobilizing<br />
the target molecule and thus an increment <strong>of</strong> mass occurred on<br />
cantilever surfaces when exposed to PrP sc solutions.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Cantilever-based microbalances were successfully coated with<br />
Seprion polymer to selectively immobilize pathogenic PrP sc .<br />
Preliminary data showed that the technique looks promising, but<br />
more focused experiments are needed to exploit its potentiality.<br />
References<br />
1. European Commission, Brussels, 16.7.2010, COM (2010) 384 final.<br />
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the<br />
Council. The TSE Road map 2, a Strategy paper on Transmissible<br />
Spongiform Encephalopathies for 2010-2015.<br />
2. Arlett, J.L., Myers, E.B., Roukes, M.L. (2011). Comparative advantages<br />
<strong>of</strong> mechanical biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 4:203-15.<br />
3. Ricciardi, C., Fiorilli, S., Bianco, S., Canavese, G., Castagna, R.,<br />
Ferrante, I., Digregorio, G., Marasso, S.L., Napione, L., Bussolino, F.<br />
(2010). Development <strong>of</strong> microcantilever based biosensor array to detect<br />
Angiopoietin-1, a marker <strong>of</strong> tumor angiogenesis. Biosens. Bioelect.,<br />
25:1193-1198<br />
Figure 1: Flow chart explaining the new technique
S4 - P - 07<br />
EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIUM<br />
AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS IN BOVINE FAECES<br />
Jean-Louis Moyen 1 , Laure Brugère 1 , Julie Charrot 2 , Eric Sellal 2 , Line Kirsty 3 , Adrian McGoldrick 3<br />
1<br />
Laboratoire départemental d’Analyse et de Recherche de la Dordogne,24660 Coulounieix-Chamiers France<br />
2<br />
Laboratoire Service International, Lisieux, France<br />
3 Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency Starcross, Exeter, United Kingdom<br />
M; avium susp. paratuberculosis, MAP,<br />
Introduction<br />
Johne’s disease or bovine paratuberculosis occurs throughout<br />
the world. It is a chronic, untreatable, intestinal disease <strong>of</strong><br />
ruminants caused by Mycobacterium avium subspecies<br />
paratuberculosis (MAP) 1 . The pr<strong>of</strong>ile and interest in the disease<br />
has risen in recent years, and consequently, it will be beneficial to<br />
have accurate information about prevalence in order to formulate<br />
policy and appropriate control strategies. Central to gaining<br />
accurate prevalence data in any country, is the availability <strong>of</strong><br />
good diagnostic methods. In order to control the disease, MAP<br />
has to be diagnosed ante-mortem by either detecting the<br />
causative agent itself or by the detection <strong>of</strong> specific antibodies.<br />
The need <strong>of</strong> a rapid, low cost, and sensitive diagnostic test would<br />
be beneficial in the detection and control <strong>of</strong> the organism. The<br />
methods currently available include solid and liquid culture,<br />
serological methodologies and more recently, polymerase chain<br />
reaction (PCR) based tests.<br />
Culture (liquid and solid) is sensitive but the time to detection<br />
ranges from 6 to 24 weeks. Serological methods tend to be<br />
used in screening programmes since they are quick and cheap,<br />
however the sensitivity is low. Available PCR methods allow fast<br />
results (2 days) but reported sensitivity also remains low.<br />
Sensitivity and the time taken to reach diagnosis are critical<br />
points in MAP management control programmes. Indeed, these<br />
disease control strategies can <strong>of</strong>ten fail because new clinical<br />
cases are found even after culling <strong>of</strong> positive diagnosed animals.<br />
In this study, with specific reference to PCR, we hypothesise that<br />
the optimization <strong>of</strong> sample preparation and nucleic acids<br />
extraction can improve the sensitivity making PCR a viable option<br />
in the control <strong>of</strong> the disease.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Faecal material from cows belonging to certified MAP free herds<br />
were used as negative controls. Positive samples originated<br />
from naturally infected animals as well as from spiking negative<br />
faeces with MAP homogenates.<br />
Naturally infected samples, as well as those spiked, were used to<br />
prepare a dilution series <strong>of</strong> samples. Each set <strong>of</strong> samples were<br />
prepared in duplicate. All samples, both naturally infected and<br />
those spiked, were thoroughly mixed to ensure homogeneity (as<br />
much as practically possible).<br />
For a field trial (epidemiological study), sampling was made from<br />
undiluted samples. The heterogeneity between samples is<br />
increased but the aliquots are more representative using real<br />
faeces.<br />
Sample preparation conditions were comparable (size, dilution,<br />
shaking, bead beating, pK incubation and spinning)<br />
In this study we compared 3 PCR methods. The first was an<br />
IS900 real time PCR test from LSI (Taqman) 2,3 using a Qiagen<br />
spin column extraction method with 1g faeces and 4 ml H2O.<br />
The alternative methods were:<br />
An ambion magnetic beads method on Magmax KF96<br />
developped by AHVLA 4 and an LSI magnetic beads (MV384)<br />
method on Magmax KF96 optimized by the LDAR24.<br />
Results<br />
Spiked and diluted faeces:<br />
All negative samples were negative<br />
Detection <strong>of</strong> higher dilutions depends on the methods<br />
Tab.1. spiked samples – CT values for serial dilutions for each<br />
method<br />
10 -2 1/2 10 -2 1/4 10 -2 1/8<br />
10 -2<br />
1/16<br />
10 -2<br />
1/32<br />
10 -2<br />
1/64<br />
Qiagen<br />
Spin<br />
columns<br />
33.52 34.44 34.73 undet 37.81 38.75<br />
35.54 35.03 35.57 35.53 34.59 undet<br />
33.26 33.97 36.09 37.85 undet 37.39<br />
33.58 38.09 36.97 38.13 undet undet<br />
mean 33.98 35.38 35.84 37.17 36.20 38.07<br />
s 1.05 1.86 0.94 1.43 2.28 0.96<br />
Soil kit<br />
24.96 26.39 27.73 28.26 29.33 31.24<br />
25.36 26.14 27.2 28.01 29.77 31.06<br />
25.3 25.81 27.16 28.17 29.4 33.1<br />
26.02 26.49 27.31 28.09 29.64 34.42<br />
mean 25.41 26.21 27.35 28.13 29.54 32.46<br />
s 0.44 0.30 0.26 0.11 0.21 1.60<br />
Ambion<br />
AHVLA<br />
28.94 28.08 30.09 30.46 31.3 33<br />
27.21 27.11 31.17 31.89 31.54 32.96<br />
26.9 29.23 30.04 31.31 31.2 32.72<br />
26.96 27.63 31.05 33.06 33.44 33.08<br />
mean 27.50 28.01 30.59 31.68 31.87 32.94<br />
s 0.97 0.90 0.61 1.09 1.06 0.15<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> samples for field trial is important.<br />
The best method sensitivity is obtained with AHVLA<br />
method.<br />
This method is requires more time and needs a larger<br />
centrifuge.<br />
The LSI magnetic beads method gives a very good<br />
sensitivity too.<br />
The classic spin column method gives the worst<br />
sensitivity<br />
The epidemiological sensitivity is much better with the<br />
optimized methods and allows better eradication<br />
program.<br />
The choice between these methods depends on the customer’s<br />
requirement. (cost versus sensitivity)<br />
References<br />
1. N. Beth Harris, R. G. Barletta Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001 14(3): 489-512<br />
Mycobacterium avium ssp paratuberculosis in veterinary medicine<br />
2. E.P. Green, M.L.V. Tizard, M.T. Moss, J. Thompson, D.J. Winterhouse,<br />
J.J. McFadden and J. Hermon-Taylor: 1989, Sequence and characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> IS900, an insertion element identiefied in a human Crohn’s disease<br />
isolate <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Nucleic acid research volume<br />
17 number 22 9063-9073<br />
3.. LSI Kit TaqVetM. paratuberculosis advanced V003<br />
4. A. McGoldrich, K. Line <strong>2012</strong> (personnal communication)<br />
<br />
<br />
Sample preparation (sample size, dilution, shaking,<br />
bead beating and spinning conditions) is very important<br />
Soil kit (Fast Dna MPBIO) gives the best sensitivity but<br />
is time consuming and is not usable for field diagnosis
S4 - P - 08<br />
REAL-TIME PCR FOR DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI, COLI AND LARI IN FOODS: TEST<br />
VALIDATION ACCORDING TO ISO16140:2003<br />
Nogarol C. 1 , Vencia W. 1 , Bianchi DM. 1 , Gallina S. 1 , Adriano D. 1 , Zuccon F. 1 , Decastelli L. 1<br />
1<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, S.C. Controllo Alimenti e Igiene delle Produzioni, Turin, Italy<br />
Campylobacter, ISO 16140:2003, Real Time PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Several countries with foodborne outbreaks (FBO) reporting<br />
systems documented significant increases over the past few<br />
decades in the incidence <strong>of</strong> diseases caused by microorganisms<br />
in food, including pathogens such as Salmonella, Campylobacter<br />
jejuni and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (3).<br />
Changes in food habits, such as a preference for fresh and<br />
minimally processed foods and the longer shelflife <strong>of</strong> products,<br />
contributed to the increased incidence <strong>of</strong> FBO ascribed to<br />
microbiological organisms.<br />
The recent EU-policy bases the surveillance <strong>of</strong> foodborne<br />
zoonoses on laboratory isolation <strong>of</strong> bacteria considered sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> outbreaks (3).<br />
Althought standardized by international bodies, cultural methods,<br />
due to execution time, not always allow the pathogen isolation<br />
and identification before outbreak conclusion, in particular when<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> FBO are represented by slow growing bacteria. On<br />
the contrary, the identification <strong>of</strong> bacteria responsible <strong>of</strong> FBO<br />
should be ended in shortly, in order to guarantee a specific<br />
therapy <strong>of</strong> ill patients and to correctly implement report database<br />
systems.<br />
For this reason, the use <strong>of</strong> alternative methods able to rapidly<br />
identify the source <strong>of</strong> FBO is recommended: European<br />
regulations accept the use <strong>of</strong> these rapid methods as long as<br />
they have been validated towards standardized reference method<br />
according to ISO 16140:2003 (1).<br />
Data here reported describe the results <strong>of</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
qualitative Real-Time PCR commercial kit for the detection <strong>of</strong><br />
Campylobacter jejuni, coli and lari (JCL) in the food category<br />
“fruit and vegetable based products”.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
From January to August 2011, the Laboratorio Controllo Alimenti<br />
e Igiene delle Produzioni, in Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale<br />
<strong>of</strong> Piemonte, Liguria and Valle d’Aosta (North-Western Italy) led a<br />
study aimed to verify the performances and to validate a<br />
Campylobacter JCL Real-Time detection kit.<br />
The commercial kit consists in two steps occurring in a semiautomated<br />
closed system: extraction <strong>of</strong> bacterial DNA and<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter JCL target genes. Reagents<br />
necessary for these two steps are included in the kit. According<br />
to the ISO 16140:2003, the validation was performed against the<br />
reference method (ISO 10272:2006) (2) and the following<br />
parameters were evaluated: Limit <strong>of</strong> Detection (LOD); relative<br />
accuracy, relative specificity and sensitivity; relative detection<br />
level (RDL); inclusivity and exclusivity.<br />
To evaluate LOD, a spiking inoculum was prepared with a<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni <strong>of</strong> 1,5*10 7<br />
CFU/ml: eight<br />
decimal dilutions were prepared and one millilitre <strong>of</strong> each dilution<br />
was used to spike samples; after incubation, pre-enriched<br />
samples were tested with commercial detection kit.<br />
In order to determine relative accuracy, relative specificity and<br />
sensitivity a total <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> 60 test portions (50% positive, with<br />
three contamination levels and 50% negative samples) were<br />
analyzed.<br />
The relative detection level (RDL) is the smallest number <strong>of</strong><br />
culturable microorganism that can be detected in the sample in<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> occasions by the alternative and reference methods: it<br />
was evaluated throught the contamination <strong>of</strong> 72 food products<br />
with the three different target microorganisms (C.jejuni, coli and<br />
lari), at three concentration levels (24 negative control, 24<br />
samples spiked with theoretical detection level and 24 samples<br />
spiked with a bacteria concentration just above LOD level). Each<br />
combination (food product-level <strong>of</strong> contamination) was replicated<br />
six times by both the alternative and reference methods.<br />
In order to evaluate the inclusivity <strong>of</strong> the alternative method, 50<br />
pure culture <strong>of</strong> target microorganism were tested. The inoculum<br />
level used was 10 to 100 times greater than the minimum RDL <strong>of</strong><br />
the alternative method.<br />
The exclusivity was verified analyzing 30 pure cultures <strong>of</strong> nontarget<br />
strains (50% <strong>of</strong> Gram positive and 50% <strong>of</strong> Gram negative)<br />
Finally, to perform a complete validation according to ISO<br />
16140:2003 an interlaboratory study was organized, in order to<br />
determine the variability <strong>of</strong> the results obtained in different<br />
laboratories using identical samples.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 10 collaborative laboratories were included in the study:<br />
each <strong>of</strong> them received 24 blind samples, spiked with three<br />
contaminations levels (8 negative controls, 8 slightly above the<br />
LOD level and 8 samples 10 times greater than LOD level).<br />
Contamination was performed with reference material (lenticules<br />
discs) from HPA containing lyophilized C. jejuni pure culture.<br />
Guidelines and requirements for the interlaboratory study are<br />
given in the Annex H <strong>of</strong> ISO 16140:2003.<br />
Results<br />
The results obtained in our laboratory defined the LOD <strong>of</strong> Real-<br />
Time PCR protocol at 4 CFU/ 25 g or ml <strong>of</strong> food sample; the<br />
Table 1 resumes the results about relative accuracy, relative<br />
specificity and sensitivity.<br />
Table 1: Criteria percentage obtained with paired tabulate; LCL:<br />
lower confidence limit at 95%<br />
PARAMETERS % LCL 95%<br />
Relative Accuracy 98.33 96<br />
Relative Specificity 100 > 98<br />
Relative Sensitivity 96,66 93<br />
Only one sample resulted positive with alternative method and<br />
negative with the reference one.<br />
Interpretation <strong>of</strong> results obtained for the determination <strong>of</strong> RDL<br />
were calculated for each level and for each food/strain<br />
combination, comparing both methods performing exact Fisher<br />
tests. Results gave a p value=1 for each contamination levels:<br />
the probability that methods are able to detect the inoculum<br />
levels is 100% in all tested samples. Results <strong>of</strong> inclusivity,<br />
exclusivity and interlaboratory study were satisfactory, confirming<br />
all expected determinations.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The alternative Real-Time PCR method was successfully<br />
validated according to ISO 16140:2003. All the criteria and<br />
parameters tested gave excellent values and allowed to consider<br />
this commercial kit suitable for <strong>of</strong>ficial control on fruit and<br />
vegetable food samples. Finally the study also confirmed that this<br />
commercial kit is easy to use and handle by laboratory<br />
personnel.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was founded by the Italian Health Ministry: Ricerca Corrente<br />
Ministero della Salute, anno 2009, IZS PLV 12/09.<br />
References<br />
1. ISO 16140:2003, Microbiology <strong>of</strong> food and animal feeding stuffs –<br />
Protocol for the validation <strong>of</strong> alternative methods.<br />
2. ISO 10272:2006, Microbiology <strong>of</strong> food and animal feeding stuffs-<br />
Horizontal method for detection and enumeration <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter spp.<br />
3. EFSA Journal <strong>2012</strong>;10(3):2597
S4 - P - 09<br />
VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN SALMONELLA DUBLIN COMPETITIVE ELISA<br />
Pourquier, P. 1 , Loic, C. 1 , Pozet, F. 2 , Buthod-Garçon, M.P. 2<br />
1<br />
IDvet, Montpellier, France<br />
2<br />
LVD39, Poligny, France,<br />
Salmonella Dublin, diagnostics, serology, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
The most common type <strong>of</strong> Salmonella affecting cattle in many<br />
countries is Salmonella enteritica, subspecies enteritica serotype<br />
Dublin (Salmonella Dublin). Salmonella Typhimurium and<br />
Salmonella Montevideo are also frequently isolated from cattle.<br />
While antigens O:1 and O:12 are common to serotypes Dublin<br />
and Typhimurium, antigen O:9 characterises infection by S.<br />
Dublin.<br />
Salmonella Dublin is a bacteria which is host-adapted to cattle<br />
and which causes both economical and welfare losses to the<br />
cattle industry. It can potentially spread to humans, particularly<br />
through the consumption <strong>of</strong> contaminated, unpasteurised milk<br />
and cheese.<br />
Unlike most other types <strong>of</strong> Salmonella bacteria, Salmonella<br />
Dublin has a tendency to reside in the herds for years or<br />
decades, mainly due to its ability to produce persistently infected<br />
carriers that shed bacteria to the environment either continuously<br />
or periodically. In order to control infection in such endemically<br />
infected herds, it is necessary to cull the carriers and prevent<br />
infection <strong>of</strong> new carriers.<br />
Serology is therefore an important tool in order to limit the spread<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disease by identifying disease carriers, and eliminate<br />
excretors before contamination <strong>of</strong> bulk milk.<br />
IDvet, in collaboration with the Jura Departmental Veterinary<br />
Laboratory (LVD 39), has developed two ELISAs for the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> antibodies against Salmonella Dublin in bovine milk, serum<br />
and plasma: ID Screen ® Salmonella Dublin Competition, and ID<br />
Screen ® Salmonella Dublin Indirect.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The specificity <strong>of</strong> the test ID Screen ®<br />
Salmonella Dublin<br />
Competition was found to be (100%, IC95% 99.5-99.99%). No<br />
false positive results due Salmonella Typhimurium were<br />
observed.<br />
The ID Screen ® competitive ELISA is a cost-effective Salmonella<br />
Dublin diagnostic method which facilitates identification <strong>of</strong> herds<br />
at risk and transitory excretors.<br />
It should be noted that the analytical sensitivity <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />
ELISA method on bulk milk is limited by degree <strong>of</strong> excretion <strong>of</strong><br />
the animal, the size <strong>of</strong> the bulk milk, and the fact that milk<br />
contains less antibodies than sera.<br />
A suggested testing protocol would be to screen bulk milks with<br />
the ID Screen Indirect ELISA, and test any positive samples<br />
individually with the competitive ELISA in order to maximize<br />
analytical sensitivity.<br />
References<br />
1. Hoorfar J, Feld NC, Schirmer AL, Bitsch V, Lind P. Serodiagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
Salmonella dublin infection in Danish dairy herds using O-antigen based<br />
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Can J Vet Res. 1994 Oct;58(4):268-<br />
74.<br />
2. Hoorfar J, Lind P, Bitsch V. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> an O antigen enzyme-linked<br />
immunosorbent assay for screening <strong>of</strong> milk samples for Salmonella dublin<br />
infection in dairy herds. Can J Vet Res. 1995 Apr;59(2):142-8.<br />
3. Nielsen LR, Ersbøll AK. Age-stratified validation <strong>of</strong> an indirect<br />
Salmonella Dublin serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for<br />
individual diagnosis in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2004 May;16(3):212-8.<br />
This study presents the test validation data for the competitive<br />
ELISA.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The ID Screen ®<br />
Salmonella Dublin Competition ELISA is a<br />
competitive ELISA based on microplates coated with S. Dublin<br />
LPS and an anti-O:9 monoclonal antibody conjugate.<br />
The ID Screen ®<br />
Salmonella Dublin Indirect ELISA is based on<br />
microplates coated with S. Dublin LPS and an anti-ruminant-HRP<br />
conjugate.<br />
Specificity:<br />
176 individual milks, 84 bulk milks, and 180 sera from a diseasefree<br />
region (Brittany, France) were tested with both kits.<br />
Exclusivity:<br />
111 individual milks from a herd infected with Salmonella<br />
Typhimurium (bacteria were isolated from several animals), were<br />
tested.<br />
Sensitivity:<br />
158 paired milk and sera samples from 20 herds with a history <strong>of</strong><br />
S. Dublin infection were tested. A bacteriological study <strong>of</strong><br />
seropositive animals allowed for the identification <strong>of</strong> excretors in<br />
Herd 2.<br />
Results<br />
Specificity and exclusivity studies: All animals were found<br />
negative with the ID Screen ®<br />
Salmonella Dublin competitive<br />
ELISA.<br />
Sensitivity study:<br />
- Correlation between milk and serum results was excellent<br />
(100%).<br />
- The average herd seroprevalence was found to be: 12.9 %<br />
(3,8%-30,2%).<br />
- 89% (16/18) <strong>of</strong> excretors were also seropositive.
S4 - P - 10<br />
ID SCREEN ® INTERFERON GAMMA ELISA : IMPROVEMENT OF ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY AND<br />
INTRODUCTION OF A STANDARD REFERENCE CONTROL TO IMPROVE RESULT INTERPRETATION<br />
Pourquier, P. 1 , Loic, C. 1 , Olagnon, L. 1 , Marion, S. 1,<br />
1<br />
IDvet, Montpellier, France<br />
Interferon gamma, diagnostics, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
Detection <strong>of</strong> Interferon gamma (IFN-g) by the sandwich ELISA<br />
method is widely used to detect the cellular response to<br />
pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis<br />
(Map) or Mycobacterium bovis by measuring the difference<br />
between activated and non-activated whole blood or peripheral<br />
Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) IFN-g signals. Results,<br />
expressed as the difference between raw optical densities, are<br />
not generally linked to a stable reference control.<br />
The ID Screen ®<br />
Ruminant IFN-g ELISA, contrary to other<br />
commercial ELISAs, expresses the level <strong>of</strong> IFN-g with respect<br />
to a standardized, freeze-dried positive reference control.<br />
This relative expression <strong>of</strong> the measured quantity <strong>of</strong> IFN-g<br />
guarantees the standardization <strong>of</strong> results between runs and kit<br />
batches.<br />
Results are expressed as sample / positive reference control<br />
(S/P) ratios.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
ID Screen ® Interferon gamma Capture ELISA: Wells are coated<br />
with an anti-IFN-γ monoclonal antibody (Mab). The conjugate is<br />
anti-IFN-γ–HRP conjugate monoclonal antibody.Creation <strong>of</strong><br />
standard reference controls: A freeze-dried positive control<br />
containing native bovine IFN-g was created and introduced onto<br />
each plate. All results were calculated with respect to this<br />
standard. A standard positive plasma reference sample was also<br />
created.<br />
Results<br />
Test baseline: Bovine and ovine sera and PBS-activated bovine<br />
and caprine plasmas were tested and found to have a low<br />
baseline with few heterophilic reactions.<br />
Analytical sensitivity: 5 bovine, 1 caprine and 1 ovine blood<br />
sample were non-specifically activated with 5 µg/ml <strong>of</strong> lectin, 24h<br />
at 37°C. Plasma was collected and each sample was serially<br />
diluted in non-activated plasma. Samples were then tested in<br />
parallel with the ID Screen ®<br />
ELISA and another commerciallyavailable<br />
IFN-g sandwich ELISA (kit A).<br />
- The ID Screen ® ELISA and Test A showed similar analytical<br />
sensitivity for ovine IFN-g, while the ID Screen ELISA<br />
demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity for bovine and<br />
caprine IFN-g. In addition, the ID Screen ® ELISA showed clearer<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> positive and negative samples.<br />
Multi-site field validation: 3 French laboratories tested previouslyactivated<br />
samples (n=216) using the ID Screen ®<br />
ELISA and<br />
another commercial ELISA.<br />
- Excellent correlation (98.6%) was found between the two tests,<br />
with the ID Screen ® test giving higher OD values for the positive<br />
samples.<br />
Field data from a Map-infected goat herd: 180 caprine blood<br />
samples from herd with a history <strong>of</strong> clinical paratuberculosis were<br />
activated with 9 different antigens, including 3 different Map<br />
extracts from a field caprine isolate, as well as PPD avium.<br />
- One <strong>of</strong> the IDvet caprine Map antigen preparations gave a<br />
similar result pr<strong>of</strong>ile to the PPD avium antigen tested.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The new ID Screen® Ruminant IFN-g ELISA has improved<br />
upon current IFN-g ELISA technology by incorporating a standard<br />
positive reference control for standardized result calculation and<br />
interpretation.<br />
The improved analytical sensitivity allows for the efficient<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> small quantities <strong>of</strong> native IFN-g (threshold dilution on<br />
other techniques), giving optical densities clearly distinct from the<br />
test baseline, thus avoiding false positive results. The very low<br />
level <strong>of</strong> heterophilic reactions and the low baseline guarantee that<br />
result interpretation is possible for all samples to be tested.<br />
In conclusion, the ID Screen ® Ruminant IFN-g ELISA is a reliable<br />
tool for the measurement <strong>of</strong> ruminant interferon gamma.<br />
References<br />
1. Buddle BM, et al. Advances in ante-mortem diagnosis <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis in<br />
cattle. New Zeland Veterinary Journal. 2009, 57(4):173-180.<br />
2. Denis M, Weldock DN, McCarthy AR, Parlane NA, Cockle PJ,<br />
Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Buddles BM, 2007. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the whole-blood gamma interferon assay for diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
Mycobacterium bovis infections in cattle. Clinical and vaccine immunology,<br />
14(11): 1483-1489.<br />
3. Gormley E, et al. The effect <strong>of</strong> the tuberculin test and the consequences<br />
<strong>of</strong> a delay in blood culture on the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> a gamma-interferon assay<br />
for the detection <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Vet Immunol<br />
Immunopathol. 2004, Dec 28;102(4):413-20<br />
4. Lardizabal AA, Reichman BL, 2006. Interferon-gamma release assay for<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> Tuberculosis Infection. US respiratory Disease, 59-61.<br />
5. Pai M, Riley LW, Colford Jr JM, 2004. Interferon-g assays in the<br />
immunodiagnosis <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis: a systematic review. Infectious diseases,<br />
4:761-776.<br />
6. Robbe-Austermann S, et al. Time delay, temperature effects and<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> positive controls on whole blood for the gamma interferon<br />
ELISA to detect Paratuberculosis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public<br />
Health. 2006, 53(5):213-7.<br />
7. Ryan JT, et al. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the gamma interferon test for detecting<br />
bovine tuberculosis in cattle 8 to 28 days after tuberculin skin testing.<br />
Research in Veterinary Science. 2000, 69(1) :57-61.
S4 - P - 11<br />
EFFECTIVE TESTING STRATEGY WITH PRIMAGAM ® FOR TUBERCULOSIS IN HUMAN PRIMATES<br />
Björn Schröder 2 , Christian Wenker 1 , Stefan Hoby 1 , Bettina Bernhard 2 , Alex J. Raeber 2<br />
1 Zoo Basel, Switzerland and 2 Prionics AG, Schlieren, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
Primates infected with tuberculosis (TB) represent a serious<br />
regulatory, ethical and health concern as TB control requires<br />
accurate diagnostic methods. However, the primary test, the<br />
tuberculin skin test has serious limitations. Both false negative<br />
and false positive reactions are common, resulting in a spread <strong>of</strong><br />
infection and devastating TB outbreaks in colonies. As a gold<br />
standard for TB diagnostic is not available, a combination <strong>of</strong> test<br />
systems has been suggested to reliably diagnose the disease. In<br />
primates the skin test should be conducted as a primary test but<br />
should always be accompanied in the early and mid term phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disease by the IFN- release assay as the most<br />
appropriate test system. As late stage diagnostic tools,<br />
serological and direct tests may provide additional diagnostic<br />
benefits.<br />
In 2010, the Basel ZOO relocated all human primates to an<br />
external facility during the construction phase <strong>of</strong> a new primate<br />
house. The occasion was used to test all animals for TB before<br />
movement <strong>of</strong> the animals and following their resettlement in the<br />
new primate house. The Guideline for the prevention and control<br />
<strong>of</strong> tuberculosis in non-human primates 1 was used as the basis for<br />
the test schedule<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Lelystad tuberculin PPD antigens (Prionics, The Netherlands)<br />
were used for stimulation <strong>of</strong> whole blood cultures. The release <strong>of</strong><br />
IFN- from PBMCs was measured with the PRIMAGAM ®<br />
(Prionics, Switzerland) sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA).<br />
Diagnostic sensitivity was assessed in primate colonies <strong>of</strong><br />
unknown Tb status.<br />
Results<br />
Here we report the TB test results from three human primate<br />
colonies from the Basel ZOO. Seven Orangutans, six Gorillas<br />
and eight Chimpanzees have been initially tested with two<br />
different skin tests, two IFN- tests (one was PRIMAGAM ® ), two<br />
antibody tests and thoracic x-ray. Animals which were negative<br />
for all test results were considered as TB free. Animals that<br />
tested positive in at least one test system were required to<br />
undergo further monitoring. One Chimpanzee was tested positive<br />
in more than one test. After relocation all reactors were tested a<br />
second time, whereas all animals were negative tested with<br />
PRIMAGAM ® .<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
We have compared the diagnostic performance <strong>of</strong> tuberculin<br />
PPD for the stimulation <strong>of</strong> blood cultures in PRIMAGAM ® IFN-<br />
assay. In the presentation we will highlight the differences <strong>of</strong><br />
different test systems and point out how and when the different<br />
tests should be conducted and how PRIMAGAM ®<br />
can help to<br />
optimize the TB diagnostic in primates.<br />
References<br />
1. Guideline for the prevention and control <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis in non-human<br />
primates: recommendations <strong>of</strong> the European primate veterinary<br />
association working group on Tuberculosis, M. Bushmitz; A. Lecu; F.<br />
Verreck; E. Preussing; S. Rensing; K. Rensing; J. Med Primatol, 38, 59-69,<br />
2009)<br />
Tuberculosis, Primagam, tuberculin,
S4 - P - 12<br />
COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT PARASITOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC METHODS<br />
USED IN ANALYSIS OF DEHYDRATED SEWAGE SLUDGES<br />
Jolanta Zdybel, Tomasz Cencek, Jacek Karamon<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Departament <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Disease, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Ascaris, Toxocara, Trichuris, eggs, sewage sludge, fertilizers<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge as fertilizer is connected with<br />
microbiological and parasitological hazards in terms <strong>of</strong> public<br />
health safety. Therefore, it is necessary to carry on proper<br />
parasitological investigations <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> samples. Majority, <strong>of</strong><br />
current parasitological diagnostic procedures using in sewage<br />
sludge surveys are derived from soil samples investigation. This<br />
kind <strong>of</strong> procedure are characterized by low efficiency, due to<br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> polyelectrolytes in sewage sludge samples.<br />
Therefore, new method <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge parasitological<br />
diagnostics was developed. The methods is focused on detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> parasitic nematodes eggs, belonging to Ascaris, Trichuris and<br />
Toxocara genus. It is combination <strong>of</strong> floatation and sedimentation<br />
method, preceded by sample prolonged dispersion. The purpose<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study is to compare the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the method developed<br />
in Department <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Diseases to other<br />
methods which are used in laboratories worldwide.<br />
References<br />
1. Zdybel J., Karamon J., Cencek C.: The occurrence <strong>of</strong> eggs <strong>of</strong><br />
parasitic roundworms (genera: Ascaris, Trichuris, Toxocara) in<br />
organic and mineral-organic fertilizers and in sewage sludge.<br />
Zycie Wet.2009,84(12),992-996.<br />
2. Simonart T., Roussel S., Gireaudot-Liepman M.F.: desk study<br />
on European standard for the enumeration <strong>of</strong> diable helminth ova<br />
in sludge, soil and solid waste. HORIZONTAL-WP3-5, France<br />
2003.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
For this study we used randomly chosen 10 dehydrated sewage<br />
sludge samples derived from Polish waste water treatment<br />
plants. Each sample weighed 10 grams (dry weight) and was<br />
examined by our own method, PN-Z-19000-4 method, flotation<br />
method described by Quinn, method according to Environmental<br />
Protection Agency (EPA) and Triple flotation (TF) method<br />
according to ANFOR XP X33-017 . Microscopy (X20) was used<br />
to estimate the number <strong>of</strong> nematode eggs.<br />
Results<br />
Results concerning percentage <strong>of</strong> positive samples and numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> detected parasite eggs obtained with the use <strong>of</strong> different<br />
methods were presented in Table 1.<br />
Table. 1. Mean number <strong>of</strong> parasite eggs and % <strong>of</strong> positive<br />
samples detected in sewage sludges samples with the use <strong>of</strong> 5<br />
different methods.<br />
Methods<br />
Mean number <strong>of</strong> detected eggs<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> positive samples)<br />
Ascaris Toxocara Trichuris<br />
Quinn<br />
2.2<br />
(70%)<br />
2.1<br />
(90%)<br />
0.3<br />
(30%)<br />
PN-Z-19000-4<br />
0.3<br />
(40%)<br />
0.15<br />
(30%)<br />
0<br />
Triple flotation<br />
0.6<br />
(10%<br />
3.3<br />
(40%)<br />
0<br />
EPA<br />
1.7<br />
(80%)<br />
1.3<br />
(100%)<br />
1.3<br />
(20%)<br />
Own method<br />
16.4<br />
(100%)<br />
11.1<br />
(100%)<br />
1.7<br />
(100%)<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the present study demonstrated that method<br />
developed in Department <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Invasive Diseases<br />
is six-fold more efficient than flotation method devised by Quinn,<br />
seven-fold more efficient than TF method and EPA method, 65-<br />
fold more efficient then PN-Z-19000-4 method. The adaptation <strong>of</strong><br />
described method in other parasitological laboratories is highly<br />
recommended.
List <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstract</strong>s (in order <strong>of</strong> number)<br />
S1-K-01 VAN DER POEL WIM H. M.<br />
S1-K-02 SCHWARZ STEFAN<br />
S1-O-01 BOSS CHRISTINA<br />
S1-O-02<br />
STRUTZBERG-<br />
MINDER<br />
KATRIN<br />
S1-O-03 BOUWSTRA RUTH<br />
S1-O-04 GÓRNA KAMILA<br />
S1-O-05 NARDINI ROBERTO<br />
S1-O-06 BALLAGI ANDREA<br />
S1-O-07 VAN MAANEN KEES<br />
S1-O-08<br />
REVILLA-<br />
FERNÁNDEZ<br />
SANDRA<br />
S1-O-09 COOLEY WILLIAM<br />
S1-O-10 LANGEVELD JAN<br />
S1-O-11<br />
REBORDOSA-<br />
TRIGUEROS<br />
XAVIER<br />
S1-O-12 O'NEILL RONAN<br />
S1-O-13 SCHIRRMEIER HORST<br />
S1-O-14 BOSS CHRISTINA<br />
S1-O-15 PORQUET-GARANTO LOURDES<br />
S1-O-15 VILLA ALEIDA<br />
S1-O-17 BALLAGI ANDREA<br />
S1-O-18 LOPEZ PABLO<br />
S2-K-01 SOLDAN ANDREW<br />
S2-O-01 NORTH SARAH<br />
THE EMERGENCE OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS – HOW TO<br />
RESPOND TO NEW EPIZOOTICS IN EUROPE<br />
ASSESSING THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF<br />
BACTERIA OBTAINED FROM ANIMALS<br />
ORAL FLUIDS – SAMPLE MATRIX FOR EFFECTIVE HERD<br />
HEALTH MONITORING<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES OF SEVERAL PRRS ANTIBODY<br />
ELISAS IN THE CONTEXT OF A LONGITUDINALSTUDY OF<br />
A FARM USING DIFFERENT VACCINATION STRATEGIES<br />
INTRODUCTION RATE OF A LOW PATHOGENIC AVIAN<br />
INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTION IN DIFFERENT DUTCH<br />
POULTRY SECTORS<br />
A DUPLEX ONE-STEP REAL TIME RT-PCR FOR DIAGNOSIS<br />
OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE<br />
VALIDATION OF A COMPETITIVE ELISA FOR THE<br />
DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES ANTI-P26 OF EQUINE<br />
INFECTIOUS ANEMIA VIRUS IN EQUINE SERA<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF A COMMERCIAL PRRS<br />
SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA ADAPTED TO ORAL FLUID<br />
SPECIMENS: FIELD SAMPLES<br />
SUBTYPING OF SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUSES BY<br />
MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME PCR<br />
IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUOUS VALIDATION OF<br />
MOLECULAR METHODS FOR ROUTINE DIAGNOSIS OF<br />
PRRSV RNA IN CLINICAL SAMPLES<br />
VIRAL DIAGNOSIS USING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON<br />
MICROSCOPY<br />
A BEAD BASED MULTIPLEX IMMUNOFLUOROMETRIC<br />
ASSAY FOR SCREENING AND CONFIRMATION OF ALL<br />
MAJOR PRION TYPES IN SHEEP<br />
USING ORAL FLUID FOR THE SEROLOGICAL<br />
MONITORIZATION OF PRRSV CIRCULATION IN A GROUP<br />
OF INFECTED GILTS<br />
ENHANCED DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY<br />
VIRUSES BY INCLUSION OF COHORT ANIMALS<br />
THE FIRST YEAR OF OBLIGATORY BVD CONTROL IN<br />
GERMANY – DIAGNOSTIC STRATEGIES, RESULTS AND<br />
EXPERIENCES<br />
EUROPEAN PRRSV – DIAGNOSTIC SOLUTIONS FOR A<br />
RAPIDLY MUTATING VIRUS<br />
SEROLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND MONITORING OF IBR IS IT<br />
POSSIBLE TO CONTROL IBRGE ANTIBODIES IN A BULK<br />
TANK MILK?<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR<br />
ZEN GEL MIX FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND QUANTIFICATION<br />
OF COXIELLA BURNETII<br />
RING TEST EVALUATION FOR THE DETECTION OF PRRSV<br />
ANTIBODIES IN ORAL FLUID SPECIMENS USING A<br />
COMMERCIAL PRRSV SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA<br />
REAL TIME PCR, MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM,<br />
MYCOPLASMA SYNOVIAE, MYCOPLASMA MELEAGRIDIS<br />
WHEN DO YOU WANT THE RESULT? HOW MUCH DO YOU<br />
WANT TO PAY!<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A RAPID ISOTHERMAL ASSAY TO<br />
DETECT TAYLORELLA EQUIGENITALIS, THE CAUSATIVE<br />
AGENT OF CONTAGIOUS EQUINE METRITIS
S2-O-02 VRANCKEN ROBERT<br />
S2-O-03 SOCHA WOJCIECH<br />
S2-O-04 VALLS LAURA<br />
S3-K-01 GAVIER-WIDÉN DOLORES<br />
S3-O-01 BOUWSTRA RUTH<br />
S3-O-02 KOOI BART<br />
S3-O-03 BÖTTCHER JENS<br />
S3-O-04 CARTER CRAIG N.<br />
S3-O-05 EGLI C.<br />
LABORATORY VALIDATION OF AN<br />
IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST FOR THE RAPID<br />
DETECTION OF KOI HERPESVIRUS (CYHV-3) IN GILL<br />
SWABS<br />
EVALUATION OF RAPID HRSV STRIP TESTS FOR<br />
DETECTION OF BOVINE RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS<br />
EVALUATION OF A LATEX AGGLUTINATION TEST FOR THE<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE OF PORCINE<br />
ORIGIN<br />
EMERGING AND RE-EMERGING WILDLIFE DISEASES:<br />
PATHOLOGY AND RELATED TECHNIQUES<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS OUTBREAK IN THE<br />
NETHERLANDS: ROUTINE DIAGNOSTICS AND TEST<br />
RESULTS<br />
25 YEARS OF PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE OF BATS IN THE<br />
NETHERLANDS. MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND<br />
EVOLUTION OF EBLV-1<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF Q FEVER IN DAIRY CATTLE BY PHASE-<br />
SPECIFIC MILK-SEROLOGY<br />
EQUINE NOCARDIOFORM PLACENTITIS & ABORTION<br />
OUTBREAK AND FARM-BASED RISK FACTOR STUDY,<br />
2010-2011<br />
A NEW DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS-<br />
IDEXX M.BOVIS ANTIBODY TEST KIT<br />
S3-O-06 LA ROCCA ANNA DETECTION OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS IN THE UK<br />
S3-O-07 CHAINTOUTIS SERAFEIM C.<br />
S3-O-08 SCHIRRMEIER HORST<br />
S3-O-09 FOERSTER CHRISTINE<br />
S3-O-10 STEINRIGL ADOLF<br />
S3-O-11 POURQUIER PHILIPPE<br />
DETECTION OF WNV ENZOOTIC CIRCULATION IN HORSES<br />
WITH NEUROLOGICAL SIGNS AND IN CAPTIVE SENTINEL<br />
CHICKENS IN THE PREFECTURE OF THESSALONIKI,<br />
GREECE<br />
SCHMALLENBERGVIRUS: SEROLOGICAL STUDIES IN<br />
GERMAN HOLDINGS<br />
DIFFERENT DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS FOR A BROAD RANGE<br />
OF MACAVIRUSES AND THEIR RESERVOIR AND<br />
SUSCEPTIBLE HOSTS<br />
DIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF SUID HERPESVIRUS 1<br />
INFECTION IN WILD BOAR<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN®<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS INDIRECT ELISA<br />
S4-K-01 KOSTRZEWA MARCUS MALDI-TOF AND OTHER NEW DIAGNOSTIC<br />
S4-O-01 RIPP ULRIKE<br />
S4-O-02 WRAGG PETER<br />
S4-O-03 RAEBER ALEX<br />
S4-O-04 HEUVELINK ANNET<br />
S4-O-05 OVERESCH GUDRUN<br />
S4-O-06 SAWYER JASON<br />
S1-P-01 AHOLA HEIKKI<br />
S1-P-02 BALLAGI ANDREA<br />
SUITABILITY OF RECOMBINANT PROTEINS FOR THE<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF LEPTOSPIROSIS IN PIGS<br />
BIOLOG GENERATION III, MATRIX ASSISTED LASER<br />
DESORPTION/IONISATION TIME-OF-FLIGHT (MALDI-TOF)<br />
MASS SPECTROMETRY AND 16S RRNA GENE<br />
SEQUENCING FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIA OF<br />
VETERINARY INTEREST<br />
EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF<br />
PEPTIDE COCKTAILS IN THE INTERFERON GAMMA ASSAY<br />
FOR DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CATTLE<br />
MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION-TIME<br />
OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY (MALDI-TOF MS) IN A<br />
VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY<br />
RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF BOVINE MASTITIS<br />
PATHOGENS USING MALDI TOF<br />
15 MINUTE ELISA USING A LOW COST COMMERCIAL<br />
BIOSENSOR<br />
LAWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS IN BLUE FOXES IN<br />
FINLAND. A CASE REPORT<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF A COMMERCIAL PRRS<br />
SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA ADAPTED TO ORAL FLUID:<br />
LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE IN EXPERIMENTALLY-<br />
INOCULATED POPULATIONS
S1-P-03 BALLAGI ANDREA<br />
S1-P-04 BENITO ALFREDO<br />
S1-P-05 BLANCHARD BEATRICE<br />
S1-P-06 BLANCHARD BEATRICE<br />
S1-P-07 BOSS CHRISTINA<br />
S1-P-08 BÖTTCHER JENS<br />
S1-P-09 VAN MAANEN KEES<br />
S1-P-10 NARDINI R.<br />
S1-P-11 CHERNYSHOV ANATOLIY<br />
S1-P-12 CHERNYSHOVA ELENA<br />
S1-P-13 COCCHI MONIA<br />
S1-P-14 CORNAGLIA ESTELA<br />
S1-P-15 EIRAS CARMEN<br />
S1-P-16 EIRAS CARMEN<br />
S1-P-17 METREVELI GIORGI<br />
S1-P-18 GEROLIMETTO ELISA<br />
S1-P-19 EIRAS CARMEN<br />
S1-P-20 HIRVELÄ-KOSKI VARPU<br />
S1-P-21 KOCHANOWSKI MACIEJ<br />
S1-P-22 KOVAC GABRIEL<br />
S1-P-23 KÜHN TILMAN<br />
S1-P-24 MAGNEE DAMIEN<br />
DETECTION OF PRRSV ANTIBODY IN ORAL FLUID<br />
SPECIMENS FROM INDIVIDUAL BOARS USING A<br />
COMMERCIAL PRRSV SERUM ANTIBODY ELISA<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF MAIN HAEMOPARASITIC DISEASES OF<br />
CATTLE BY REAL-TIME PCR<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A NEW AND<br />
ORIGINAL EXTRACTION PROTOCOL TO DETECT<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS IN<br />
BOVINE FECES BY REAL TIME<br />
VALIDATION OF REAL-TIME PCR TEST FOR THE<br />
DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF COXIELLA<br />
BURNETII FOR ABORTION CONTROL PROGRAM<br />
ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF A SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUS<br />
PCR ON AVIAN SAMPLES<br />
QUALITY CONTROL OF PRRSV VACCINATION BY<br />
PARAMETERS OF IMMUNITY<br />
PTS FOR BVDV ANTIGEN DETECTION BY GD - ANIMAL<br />
HEALTH SERVICE<br />
PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL<br />
PROFICIENCY TEST FOR THE SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS<br />
OF EQUINE INFECTIOUS ANEMIA CONDUCTED IN ITALY<br />
BETWEEN 2006-2010<br />
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF AVIBACTERIUM<br />
(HAEMOPHILUS) PARAGALLINARUM ISOLATES<br />
RECOVERED IN THE RUSSIAN TERRITORY<br />
COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY OF<br />
RABIES VIRUS ISOLATION IN NEUROBLASTOMA CELL<br />
CULTURE WITH ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY OF MOUSE<br />
INOCULATION TEST<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF GLOBICATELLA SANGUINIS<br />
ISOLATED FROM PNEUMONIA IN A GOAT<br />
KAIZEN PROCESS APPLIED AT THE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE<br />
OF FACULTÉ DE MÉDICINE VÉTÉRINAIRE, UNIVERSITÉ DE<br />
MONTREAL<br />
ACCURACY OF PARATUBERCULOSIS ANTIBODY ELISA AT<br />
PREDICTING FECAL SHEDDING OF MYCOBACTERIUM<br />
AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS IN CATTLE<br />
EVALUATION OF AN ELISA ASSAY AS AN ANCILLARY<br />
METHOD IN A HERD WITH A NATURAL TUBERCULOSIS<br />
INFECTION<br />
VIROLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE AND CHARACTERIZATION<br />
OF AVIAN-LIKE REASSORTANT H1N2 SWINE INFLUENZA<br />
VIRUSES IN SWEDEN<br />
A TOOL TO ASSESS ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE<br />
PATTERNS IN DAIRY FARMS<br />
CHARACTERIZATION OF EXTENDED-SPECTRUM ß-<br />
LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING ESCHERICHIA COLI<br />
BOVINE ISOLATES IN NORTHWEST SPAIN<br />
OVINE ABORTION CAUSED BY YERSINIA<br />
PSEUDOTUBERCULOSIS – A CASE REPORT<br />
ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE MCMASTER<br />
METHOD IN RAYNAUD’S MODIFICATION IN DETECTION OF<br />
TOXOCARA SP. AND TRICHURIS SP. EGGS IN<br />
CARNIVORES FAECES<br />
MILK AMYLOID A AND ITS USEFULNESS IN THE<br />
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF MASTITIS<br />
RELIABLE AND EARLY DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN<br />
PIGS<br />
DETECTION OF BVD VIRUS ON PERSISTENTLY INFECTED<br />
CALVES BY REAL TIME REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION PCR<br />
ON EAR NOTCHES
S1-P-25 MARQUES SARA<br />
S1-P-26 MICHALSKI MIROSLAW<br />
S1-P-27 MICHALSKI MIROSLAW<br />
S1-P-28 MELONI D.<br />
S1-P-29 PRITZ-VERSCHUREN SYLVIA<br />
S1-P-30 PROHASKA SARAH<br />
S1-P-31 SATTLER TATJANA<br />
S1-P-32 SCHROEDER CARSTEN<br />
S1-P-33<br />
SCICLUNA<br />
MARIA<br />
TERESA<br />
S1-P-34 KOVAC GABRIEL<br />
S1-P-35 WIDÉN FREDERIK<br />
GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY DETERMINATION OF<br />
PATHOGENIC PROTOTHECA<br />
DETECTION OF SAXITOXINE (PSP MARINE BIOTOXIN) IN<br />
MOLLUSCS BY ELISA<br />
PROFICIENCY TESTING (PT) FOR CHEMICAL<br />
LABORATORIES PERFORMING ANALYSIS OF MEAT AND<br />
MEAT PRODUCTS ORGANISED BY NVRI IN PULAWY<br />
SPECIFIED RISK MATERIAL REMOVAL PRACTICES: CAN<br />
WE REDUCE THE BSE HAZARD TO HUMAN HEALTH<br />
LOW PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTIONS<br />
ON POULTRY FARMS IN THE NETHERLANDS<br />
DETECTION OF BRACHYSPIRA HYODYSENTERIAE AND<br />
BRACHYSPIRA PILOSICOLI IN SWISS PIGS USING A<br />
COMBINATION OF CULTURE AND PCR<br />
PRRSV DIAGNOSTICS BY RT-PCR AND DIFFERENT ELISA<br />
SYSTEMS IN SERUM AND ORAL FLUID OF PRRSV<br />
VACCINATED PIGS<br />
RELIABLE DETECTION AND TYPING OF PRRSV USING<br />
MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME RT-PCR<br />
APPLICATION OF A HERD PROGRAMME BASED ON<br />
CONTROL MEASURES AND LABORATORY MONITORING<br />
TO ERADICATE A LEPTOSPIRA OUTBREAK IN A LARGE<br />
DAIRY CATTLE HERD<br />
THE SERUM PROTEIN ELECTROPHORETIC PATTERN IN<br />
CALVES WITH CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASES<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A BROADLY DETECTING ASSAY FOR<br />
FLAVIVIRUS USING A NOVEL CONCEPT<br />
S1-P-36 O'NEILL RONAN EXTENDING THE SHELF LIFE OF COMMERCIAL ELISA KITS<br />
S1-P-37 POLAK MIROSŁAW P.<br />
S1-P-38 SZCZOTKA MARIA<br />
S1-P-39 SZCZOTKA MARIA<br />
S1-P-40 SZCZOTKA ANNA<br />
S2-P-01 OLOFSON ANN-SOPHIE<br />
S2-P-02 SANZ ANTONIO<br />
S2-P-03 LEBLANC NEIL<br />
S3-P-01 ACHTERBERG RENÉ<br />
S3-P-02 ARENT ZBIGNIEW<br />
S3-P-03 BLOME SANDRA<br />
S3-P-04 SCHELP CHRISTIAN<br />
S3-P-05 KARAMON JACEK<br />
MONITORING OF BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS (BVDV)<br />
IN DAIRY CATTLE HERDS IN POLAND<br />
DETECTION OF BOVINE LEUKAEMIA VIRUS PROVIRAL<br />
DNA IN DENDRITIC CELLS BY IN SITU PCR<br />
BOVINE BLOOD DENDRITIC CELLS IN CATTLE INFECTED<br />
WITH BOVINE LEUKAEMIA VIRUS (BLV<br />
PORCINE CIRCOVIRUS TYPE 2 IN POSTWEANING PIGS<br />
WITH ANTIBIOTIC NON-RESPONSIVE DIARRHEA<br />
EVALUATION OF FIELD BASED METHODS FOR<br />
DETECTION OF CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER BY PCR<br />
NEW IMMUNOASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ASFV BASED<br />
ON VP72: CAPTURE ELISA FOR DETECTION OF IGM<br />
SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND PEN-SIDE TEST FOR BLOOD<br />
SAMPLES<br />
PORTABLE PLATFORMS FOR THE DETECTION OF<br />
AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS TESTED IN FIELD<br />
CONDITIONS IN NORTHERN UGANDA<br />
BEAD-BASED SUSPENSION ARRAY FOR THE<br />
SIMULTANIOUS DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES AGAINS THE<br />
RIFT VALLEY FEVER VIRUS NUCLEOCAPSID AND GN<br />
GLYCOPROTEIN<br />
LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE-CAPTURE ELISA FOR THE<br />
DETECTION OF LEPTOSPIRA BORGPETERSENII SEROVAR<br />
HARDJO IN SHEEP<br />
EVALUATION OF DIRECT BLOOD POLYMERASE CHAIN<br />
REACTION FOR RAPID DETECTION OF AFRICAN SWINE<br />
FEVER VIRUS<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS ANTIBODY<br />
ELISA<br />
DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS MULTILOCULARIS IN<br />
FOXES’ FAECES BY PCR WITH THE USE OF DILUTED DNA<br />
SAMPLES – COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF<br />
DNA ISOLATION
S3-P-06 KELLER SELINA<br />
S3-P-07 KÖNIG MATTHIAS<br />
COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND PCR FOR DETECTION<br />
OF MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS<br />
IN BOVINE FAECES<br />
HEPATITIS E VIRUS IN DOMESTIC SWINE AND WILD BOAR<br />
FROM GERMANY<br />
S3-P-08 MAGNEE DAMIEN EMERGENCE OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS:<br />
S3-P-09 NARDINI ROBERTO<br />
S3-P-10 ŚMIETANKA KRZYSZTOF<br />
S3-P-11 PELETTO SIMONE<br />
S3-P-12 POURQUIER PHILIPE<br />
S3-P-13 RABALSKI LUKASZ<br />
S3-P-14 RANZ ANA<br />
S3-P-15 REID SCOTT M.<br />
S3-P-16 REID SCOTT M.<br />
S3-P-17 KOLBASOV DENIS<br />
S3-P-18 SKRZYPCZAK TERESA<br />
S3-P-19 WELLENBERG GERARD<br />
S3-P-20 MAZZONE PIERA<br />
S3-P-21 MAZZONE PIERA<br />
S3-P-22 LARSKA MAGDALENA<br />
S3-P-23 LARSKA MAGDALENA<br />
S3-P-24 LOEFFEN W.L.A.<br />
S3-P-25 COOLEY W.A.<br />
S3-P-26 MATERNIAK MAGDALENA<br />
S4-P-01 ALTMANN MICHAELA<br />
S4-P-02 ARENT ZBIGNIEW<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF A SOLID- PHASE<br />
COMPETITIVE ELISA FOR THE DETECTION OF<br />
ANTIBODIES AGAINST WEST NILE DISEASE VIRUS IN<br />
HORSE SERA<br />
SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF<br />
INFLUENZA A VIRUS AND NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS BY<br />
ONE STEP RT-PCR<br />
DOLPHIN MORBILLIVIRUS INFECTION IN A CAPTIVE<br />
HARBOR SEAL (PHOCA VITULINA)<br />
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN AFRICAN<br />
SWINE FEVER INDIRECT ELISA BASED ON THREE<br />
RECOMBINANT ASF PROTEINS<br />
ONE STEP RT-PCR FOLLOWED BY MSSCP AS A NOVEL<br />
METHOD FOR A FAST AND RELIABLE DETECTION AND<br />
DIFFERENTIATION OF MIXED INFECTION WITH<br />
NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISPECIES SEROLOGICAL<br />
ASSAYS TO DETECT ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS IN SERUM SAMPLES<br />
FIRST REPORTED LOW PATHOGENCITY AVIAN<br />
INFLEUNZA VIRUS SUBTYPE H9 NFECTION OF DOMESTIC<br />
FOWL IN ENGLAND<br />
DETECTION OF IBV QX IN COMMERCIAL POULTRY<br />
FLOCKS IN THE UNITED KINGDO<br />
APPLICATION OF REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION REAL-TIME<br />
PCR TO DETECT THE SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS GENOME<br />
PREVALENCE OF COXIELLA BURNETII ANTIBODIES IN<br />
SHEEP AND GOATS IN FINLAND<br />
DETECTION OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS IN BOVINE<br />
SEMEN BY ONE-STEP REAL-TIME RT-PCR<br />
INTERFERON-GAMMA ASSAY TO DIAGNOSE<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS INFECTION IN PIGS<br />
USE OF EXPERIMENTAL JOHNIN IN THE GAMMA-<br />
INTERFERON TEST IN CATTLE INFECTED BY<br />
MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS:<br />
PRELIMINARY DATA<br />
COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF FIVE<br />
DIFFERENT IMMUNOASSAYS TO DETECT SPECIFIC<br />
ANTIBODIES AGAINST EMERGING ATYPICAL BOVINE<br />
PESTIVIRUS<br />
SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS (SBV) IN POLAND –<br />
PRELIMINARY RESULTS<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRUS NEUTRALISATION TEST TO<br />
DETECT ANTIBODIES AGAINST<br />
VIRAL DIAGNOSIS USING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON<br />
MICROSCOPY SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS<br />
DETECTION OF EQUINE FOAMY VIRUS INFECTIONS IN<br />
HORSES<br />
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF MYCOBACTERIUM<br />
AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS STRAINS IN A<br />
NATIONAL PARATUBERCULOSIS CONTROL PROGRAM<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR<br />
ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF LEPTOSPIRA<br />
BORGPETERSENII SEROVAR HARDJO IN URINE AND<br />
KIDNEY
S4-P-03 DĄBROWSKA JOANNA<br />
S4-P-04 ISAKSSON MATS<br />
S4-P-05 MARTOS RAICH ALBA<br />
S4-P-06 MELONI DANIELA<br />
S4-P-07 MOYEN JEAN-LOUIS<br />
S4-P-08 NOGAROL CHIARA<br />
S4-P-09 POURQUIER PHILIPPE<br />
S4-P-10 POURQUIER PHILIPPE<br />
S4-P-11 SCHROEDER BJOERN<br />
S4-P-12 ZDYBEL JOLANTA<br />
USEFULNESS OF LIVE/DEAD BACLIGHT BACTERIAL<br />
VIABILITY KIT TYPE 7007 MOLECULAR PROBES FOR<br />
EVALUATION OF VIABILITY ASCARIS SP., TOXOCARA SP.<br />
AND TRICHURIS SP. EGGS ISOLATED FROM SEWAGE<br />
SLUDGE<br />
AUTOMATION OF A CAPTURE PROBE MAGNETIC BEAD<br />
DNA EXTRACTION METHOD FOR 3 GRAM FAECAL<br />
SAMPLES FROM RED FOX INTENDED FOR PCR-<br />
DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS MULTILOCULARIS<br />
EVALUATION OF THREE ELISAS FOR DETECTING SERUM<br />
ANTIBODIES AGAINST MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE.<br />
SEPRION-COATED MICROCANTILEVER SENSORS FOR<br />
PRPSC DETECTION<br />
EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTION METHODS<br />
FOR THE DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM<br />
SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS IN BOVINE FAECES<br />
REAL-TIME PCR FOR DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER<br />
JEJUNI, COLI AND LARI IN FOODS: TEST VALIDATION<br />
ACCORDING TO ISO16140:2003<br />
VALIDATION OF THE ID SCREEN SALMONELLA DUBLIN<br />
COMPETITIVE ELIS<br />
ID SCREEN® INTERFERON GAMMA ELISA :<br />
IMPROVEMENT OF ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY AND<br />
INTRODUCTION OF A STANDARD REFERENCE CONTROL<br />
TO IMPROVE RESULT INTERPRETATION<br />
EFFECTIVE TESTING STRATEGY WITH PRIMAGAM® FOR<br />
TUBERCULOSIS IN HUMAN PRIMATES<br />
COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT<br />
PARASITOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC METHODS USED IN<br />
ANALYSIS OF DEHYDRATED SEWAGE SLUDGES
List <strong>of</strong> abstracts (alphabetical order <strong>of</strong> presenting authors)<br />
ACHTERBERG RENÉ S3-P-01<br />
AHOLA HEIKKI S1-P-01<br />
ALTMANN MICHAELA S4-P-01<br />
ARENT ZBIGNIEW S3-P-02<br />
ARENT ZBIGNIEW S4-P-02<br />
BALLAGI ANDREA S1-O-06<br />
BALLAGI ANDREA S1-O-17<br />
BALLAGI ANDREA S1-P-02<br />
BALLAGI ANDREA S1-P-03<br />
BENITO ALFREDO S1-P-04<br />
BLANCHARD BEATRICE S1-P-05<br />
BLANCHARD BEATRICE S1-P-06<br />
BLOME SANDRA S3-P-03<br />
BOSS CHRISTINA S1-O-01<br />
BOSS CHRISTINA S1-O-14<br />
BOSS CHRISTINA S1-P-07<br />
BÖTTCHER JENS S3-O-03<br />
BÖTTCHER JENS S1-P-08<br />
BOUWSTRA RUTH S1-O-03<br />
BOUWSTRA RUTH S3-O-01<br />
CARTER CRAIG N. S3-O-04<br />
CHAINTOUTIS SERAFEIM C. S3-O-07<br />
CHERNYSHOV ANATOLIY S1-P-11<br />
CHERNYSHOVA ELENA S1-P-12<br />
COCCHI MONIA S1-P-13<br />
COOLEY WILLIAM S1-O-09<br />
COOLEY W.A. S3-P-25<br />
CORNAGLIA ESTELA S1-P-14<br />
DĄBROWSKA JOANNA S4-P-03<br />
EGLI C. S3-O-05<br />
EIRAS CARMEN S1-P-15<br />
EIRAS CARMEN S1-P-16<br />
EIRAS CARMEN S1-P-19<br />
FOERSTER CHRISTINE S3-O-09<br />
GAVIER-WIDÉN DOLORES S3-K-01<br />
GEROLIMETTO ELISA S1-P-18<br />
GÓRNA KAMILA S1-O-04<br />
HEUVELINK ANNET S4-O-04<br />
HIRVELÄ-KOSKI VARPU S1-P-20<br />
ISAKSSON MATS S4-P-04<br />
KARAMON JACEK S3-P-05<br />
KELLER SELINA S3-P-06<br />
KOCHANOWSKI MACIEJ S1-P-21<br />
KOLBASOV DENIS S3-P-17<br />
KÖNIG MATTHIAS S3-P-07<br />
KOOI BART S3-O-02<br />
KOSTRZEWA MARCUS S4-K-01<br />
KOVAC GABRIEL S1-P-22<br />
KOVAC GABRIEL S1-P-34<br />
KÜHN TILMAN S1-P-23<br />
LA ROCCA ANNA S3-O-06<br />
LANGEVELD JAN S1-O-10<br />
LARSKA MAGDALENA S3-P-22<br />
LARSKA MAGDALENA S3-P-23<br />
LEBLANC NEIL S2-P-03<br />
LOEFFEN W.L.A. S3-P-24<br />
LOPEZ PABLO S1-O-18<br />
MAGNEE DAMIEN S1-P-24<br />
MAGNEE DAMIEN S3-P-08<br />
MARQUES SARA S1-P-25<br />
MARTOS RAICH ALBA S4-P-05<br />
MATERNIAK MAGDALENA S3-P-26<br />
MAZZONE PIERA S3-P-20<br />
MAZZONE PIERA S3-P-21<br />
MELONI D. S1-P-28<br />
MELONI DANIELA S4-P-06<br />
METREVELI GIORGI S1-P-17<br />
MICHALSKI MIROSLAW S1-P-26<br />
MICHALSKI MIROSLAW S1-P-27<br />
MOYEN JEAN-LOUIS S4-P-07<br />
NARDINI ROBERTO S1-O-05<br />
NARDINI R. S1-P-10<br />
NARDINI ROBERTO S3-P-09<br />
NOGAROL CHIARA S4-P-08<br />
NORTH SARAH S2-O-01<br />
OLOFSON ANN-SOPHIE S2-P-01<br />
O'NEILL RONAN S1-O-12<br />
O'NEILL RONAN S1-P-36<br />
OVERESCH GUDRUN S4-O-05<br />
PELETTO SIMONE S3-P-11<br />
POLAK MIROSŁAW P. S1-P-37<br />
PORQUET-<br />
GARANTO LOURDES S1-O-15<br />
POURQUIER PHILIPPE S3-O-11<br />
POURQUIER PHILIPE S3-P-12<br />
POURQUIER PHILIPPE S4-P-09<br />
POURQUIER PHILIPPE S4-P-10<br />
PRITZ-<br />
VERSCHUREN SYLVIA S1-P-29<br />
PROHASKA SARAH S1-P-30<br />
RABALSKI LUKASZ S3-P-13<br />
RAEBER ALEX S4-O-03
RANZ ANA S3-P-14<br />
REBORDOSA-<br />
TRIGUEROS XAVIER S1-O-11<br />
REID SCOTT M. S3-P-15<br />
REID SCOTT M. S3-P-16<br />
REVILLA-<br />
FERNÁNDEZ SANDRA S1-O-08<br />
RIPP ULRIKE S4-O-01<br />
SANZ ANTONIO S2-P-02<br />
SATTLER TATJANA S1-P-31<br />
SAWYER JASON S4-O-06<br />
SCHELP CHRISTIAN S3-P-04<br />
SCHIRRMEIER HORST S1-O-13<br />
SCHIRRMEIER HORST S3-O-08<br />
SCHROEDER CARSTEN S1-P-32<br />
SCHROEDER BJOERN S4-P-11<br />
SCHWARZ STEFAN S1-K-02<br />
SCICLUNA MARIA TERESA S1-P-33<br />
SKRZYPCZAK TERESA S3-P-18<br />
SOCHA WOJCIECH S2-O-03<br />
SOLDAN ANDREW S2-K-01<br />
STEINRIGL ADOLF S3-O-10<br />
STRUTZBERG-<br />
MINDER KATRIN S1-O-02<br />
SZCZOTKA MARIA S1-P-38<br />
SZCZOTKA MARIA S1-P-39<br />
SZCZOTKA ANNA S1-P-40<br />
ŚMIETANKA KRZYSZTOF S3-P-10<br />
VALLS LAURA S2-O-04<br />
VAN DER POEL WIM H. M. S1-K-01<br />
VAN MAANEN KEES S1-O-07<br />
VAN MAANEN KEES S1-P-09<br />
VILLA ALEIDA S1-O-15<br />
VRANCKEN ROBERT S2-O-02<br />
WELLENBERG GERARD S3-P-19<br />
WIDÉN FREDERIK S1-P-35<br />
WRAGG PETER S4-O-02<br />
ZDYBEL JOLANTA S4-P-12