Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
S1 - O - 11<br />
USING ORAL FLUID FOR THE SEROLOGICAL MONITORIZATION OF PRRSV CIRCULATION IN A<br />
GROUP OF INFECTED GILTS<br />
Martos-Raich, Alba 1 , Coma-Oliva, Ester 1 ; Serra-Martínez, Jordi 2 ; Barrera-Toro, Xavier 3 ; Planasdemunt-Regàs,<br />
Llorenç 3 ; Maldonado-García, Jaime 1 ; Porquet-Garanto, Lourdes 1 ; Rebordosa-Trigueros, Xavier 1 .<br />
1 HIPRA 17170 Amer, Girona, Spain.<br />
2 Bi<strong>of</strong>ar Laboratoris, S.L 08261 Cardona, Barcelona, Spain.<br />
3 AVP Planasdemunt i Associats 17400 Breda, Girona, Spain<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> oral fluid-based assays is proving every day that is<br />
well suited for monitoring <strong>of</strong> different pathogens in farm animals 1 .<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> PRRSV different studies have shown that pig oral<br />
fluid (OF) is a suitable sample for monitoring both viremia (PCR)<br />
and sero-conversion (ELISA) after infection 2 . In this study a new<br />
methodology to adapt the existing CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S and<br />
A/S ELISA kits (Hipra) to be used with OF matrix instead <strong>of</strong><br />
serum was evaluated under field conditions. The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to compare the performance <strong>of</strong> the ELISA kits<br />
using individual or pooled serum samples, as well as OF from<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> animals.<br />
PPRS virus, oral fluid, ELISA, alternative for monitoring<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The study included a single group <strong>of</strong> 10 gilts coming from a<br />
PRRSV-free farm (as confirmed by PCR and ELISA at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the study). The animals were infected in isolation<br />
using a field strain <strong>of</strong> PRRSV Type 1 on day 0. The study lasted<br />
for 9 weeks (wk) with weekly sampling <strong>of</strong> blood from each<br />
individual and OF samples from the group. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />
antibodies to PRRSV Type 1 and 2 was evaluated by using the<br />
CIVTEST SUIS PRRSV E/S and CIVTEST SUIS PRRS A/S<br />
ELISA kits respectively (Hipra) and also by Western blot based in<br />
a European strain. Individual serum samples were tested for the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> viral RNA by Real Time RT-PCR 3 . Serums samples<br />
were analyzed individually and as a pool <strong>of</strong> 10 (pool/10). For OF<br />
serology different conjugates (anti-IgG1,-IgG2, -IgA) for the<br />
ELISA were evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
The incubation conditions for OF were fixed at 4 ºC <strong>of</strong> a ½<br />
dilution <strong>of</strong> the sample. In all cases an IRPC <strong>of</strong> 20.0 was used as<br />
a cut-<strong>of</strong>f (as defined in CIVTEST for individual serum). As seen in<br />
Table I, results from individual serum showed 80% <strong>of</strong> positive<br />
animals at wk3 (100% at wk4). The IRPC values for the pool/10<br />
and OF samples showed a value above 20 at wk4. Both, the<br />
mean IRPC value <strong>of</strong> the group and the IRPC <strong>of</strong> the pool/10<br />
increased until the end <strong>of</strong> the study. By contrast, IRPC values<br />
obtained for the OF sample showed a maximum at wk4, and then<br />
dropped down till the end <strong>of</strong> the trial. No reactivity was observed<br />
with the A/S kit (data not shown). The use <strong>of</strong> different conjugates<br />
for the analysis <strong>of</strong> OF samples indicated that the most abundant<br />
type <strong>of</strong> Ig after infection was IgA (already detectable at wk1 postinfection;<br />
Figure 1). The kinetics <strong>of</strong> IgG1 showed sero-conversion<br />
around 3-4 weeks after infection. IgG2 levels were nondetectable<br />
(data not shown). The maximum sensitivity (IRPC<br />
above 20 at wk1) was achieved by using a combination <strong>of</strong> IgG1<br />
plus IgA conjugates.<br />
Figure1. OD450 values obtained with the oral fluid weekly<br />
samplings using conjugates with different antibody-type<br />
specificity<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S has shown a good adaptation to the<br />
OF matrix. This sample evidenced antibody dynamics similar to<br />
those observed with the pool/10 serum sample, representing a<br />
suitable alternative for monitoring PRRSV circulation in pig herds.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> different channels (IgG1 or IgA) for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
OF sample would allow to asses maximum earliness in the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> infection or detection <strong>of</strong> the fall in post-infection<br />
immunity.<br />
References<br />
1. Prickett, J.R. et al: 2010, Anim Hlth Res. Rev. 11(2): 207-216.<br />
2. Kittawornrat, A. et al: 2010, Virus Res. Dec;154(1-2):170-176.<br />
3. Martínez, E. et al: 2008, Res. Vet. Sci. 85: 184-193<br />
Table I. Serology results obtained with serum and oral fluid using<br />
the CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S at weekly intervals after infection<br />
(IRPC values above 20.0 appear in shaded boxes)<br />
PRRS E/S<br />
% Pos<br />
(ELISA)<br />
wk<br />
0<br />
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6 wk7 wk8 wk9<br />
0% 0% 0% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100%<br />
Mean (IRPC) -1,49 -1,38 8,64 24,32 41,75 46,56 70,47 50,96 72,67 72,00<br />
Pool/10<br />
(IRPC)<br />
-1,80 -2,09 4,19 11,52 23,95 54,09 57,88 48,48 68,97 87,19<br />
OF (IRPC) -5,20 -4,22 0,13 14,08 46,65 31,48 35,19 29,74 20,52 32,66<br />
OF/IgG1+IgA<br />
(IRPC)<br />
4,33 44,02 60,07 71,66 99,72 96,37 97,72 86,04 80,60 99,95