22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S1 - O - 11<br />

USING ORAL FLUID FOR THE SEROLOGICAL MONITORIZATION OF PRRSV CIRCULATION IN A<br />

GROUP OF INFECTED GILTS<br />

Martos-Raich, Alba 1 , Coma-Oliva, Ester 1 ; Serra-Martínez, Jordi 2 ; Barrera-Toro, Xavier 3 ; Planasdemunt-Regàs,<br />

Llorenç 3 ; Maldonado-García, Jaime 1 ; Porquet-Garanto, Lourdes 1 ; Rebordosa-Trigueros, Xavier 1 .<br />

1 HIPRA 17170 Amer, Girona, Spain.<br />

2 Bi<strong>of</strong>ar Laboratoris, S.L 08261 Cardona, Barcelona, Spain.<br />

3 AVP Planasdemunt i Associats 17400 Breda, Girona, Spain<br />

Introduction<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> oral fluid-based assays is proving every day that is<br />

well suited for monitoring <strong>of</strong> different pathogens in farm animals 1 .<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> PRRSV different studies have shown that pig oral<br />

fluid (OF) is a suitable sample for monitoring both viremia (PCR)<br />

and sero-conversion (ELISA) after infection 2 . In this study a new<br />

methodology to adapt the existing CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S and<br />

A/S ELISA kits (Hipra) to be used with OF matrix instead <strong>of</strong><br />

serum was evaluated under field conditions. The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to compare the performance <strong>of</strong> the ELISA kits<br />

using individual or pooled serum samples, as well as OF from<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> animals.<br />

PPRS virus, oral fluid, ELISA, alternative for monitoring<br />

Materials & methods<br />

The study included a single group <strong>of</strong> 10 gilts coming from a<br />

PRRSV-free farm (as confirmed by PCR and ELISA at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the study). The animals were infected in isolation<br />

using a field strain <strong>of</strong> PRRSV Type 1 on day 0. The study lasted<br />

for 9 weeks (wk) with weekly sampling <strong>of</strong> blood from each<br />

individual and OF samples from the group. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

antibodies to PRRSV Type 1 and 2 was evaluated by using the<br />

CIVTEST SUIS PRRSV E/S and CIVTEST SUIS PRRS A/S<br />

ELISA kits respectively (Hipra) and also by Western blot based in<br />

a European strain. Individual serum samples were tested for the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> viral RNA by Real Time RT-PCR 3 . Serums samples<br />

were analyzed individually and as a pool <strong>of</strong> 10 (pool/10). For OF<br />

serology different conjugates (anti-IgG1,-IgG2, -IgA) for the<br />

ELISA were evaluated.<br />

Results<br />

The incubation conditions for OF were fixed at 4 ºC <strong>of</strong> a ½<br />

dilution <strong>of</strong> the sample. In all cases an IRPC <strong>of</strong> 20.0 was used as<br />

a cut-<strong>of</strong>f (as defined in CIVTEST for individual serum). As seen in<br />

Table I, results from individual serum showed 80% <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

animals at wk3 (100% at wk4). The IRPC values for the pool/10<br />

and OF samples showed a value above 20 at wk4. Both, the<br />

mean IRPC value <strong>of</strong> the group and the IRPC <strong>of</strong> the pool/10<br />

increased until the end <strong>of</strong> the study. By contrast, IRPC values<br />

obtained for the OF sample showed a maximum at wk4, and then<br />

dropped down till the end <strong>of</strong> the trial. No reactivity was observed<br />

with the A/S kit (data not shown). The use <strong>of</strong> different conjugates<br />

for the analysis <strong>of</strong> OF samples indicated that the most abundant<br />

type <strong>of</strong> Ig after infection was IgA (already detectable at wk1 postinfection;<br />

Figure 1). The kinetics <strong>of</strong> IgG1 showed sero-conversion<br />

around 3-4 weeks after infection. IgG2 levels were nondetectable<br />

(data not shown). The maximum sensitivity (IRPC<br />

above 20 at wk1) was achieved by using a combination <strong>of</strong> IgG1<br />

plus IgA conjugates.<br />

Figure1. OD450 values obtained with the oral fluid weekly<br />

samplings using conjugates with different antibody-type<br />

specificity<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S has shown a good adaptation to the<br />

OF matrix. This sample evidenced antibody dynamics similar to<br />

those observed with the pool/10 serum sample, representing a<br />

suitable alternative for monitoring PRRSV circulation in pig herds.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> different channels (IgG1 or IgA) for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

OF sample would allow to asses maximum earliness in the<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> infection or detection <strong>of</strong> the fall in post-infection<br />

immunity.<br />

References<br />

1. Prickett, J.R. et al: 2010, Anim Hlth Res. Rev. 11(2): 207-216.<br />

2. Kittawornrat, A. et al: 2010, Virus Res. Dec;154(1-2):170-176.<br />

3. Martínez, E. et al: 2008, Res. Vet. Sci. 85: 184-193<br />

Table I. Serology results obtained with serum and oral fluid using<br />

the CIVTEST SUIS PRRS E/S at weekly intervals after infection<br />

(IRPC values above 20.0 appear in shaded boxes)<br />

PRRS E/S<br />

% Pos<br />

(ELISA)<br />

wk<br />

0<br />

wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk6 wk7 wk8 wk9<br />

0% 0% 0% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100%<br />

Mean (IRPC) -1,49 -1,38 8,64 24,32 41,75 46,56 70,47 50,96 72,67 72,00<br />

Pool/10<br />

(IRPC)<br />

-1,80 -2,09 4,19 11,52 23,95 54,09 57,88 48,48 68,97 87,19<br />

OF (IRPC) -5,20 -4,22 0,13 14,08 46,65 31,48 35,19 29,74 20,52 32,66<br />

OF/IgG1+IgA<br />

(IRPC)<br />

4,33 44,02 60,07 71,66 99,72 96,37 97,72 86,04 80,60 99,95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!