Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S4 - P - 02<br />
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PCR ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF<br />
LEPTOSPIRA BORGPETERSENII SEROVAR HARDJO IN URINE AND KIDNEY<br />
Zbigniew Arent 1 , Caroline Frizzell 2 , Colm Gilmore 1 , William Ellis 1<br />
1<br />
OIE Leptospirosis Reference Laboratory, Veterinary Sciences Division, AFBI, Belfast, Northern Ireland<br />
2<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science, School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University <strong>of</strong> Belfast<br />
Leptospira, leptospirosis, real-time PCR<br />
Introduction<br />
Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo is the most common<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis in cattle throughout the world. Infection <strong>of</strong><br />
cattle with Hardjo can cause abortion, stillbirth, birth <strong>of</strong> weak<br />
calves and decreased milk production (1, 2). Infected animals<br />
can act as lifelong renal carriers without clinical signs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disease (3) and shed live organisms over a long period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
(4).<br />
There is no satisfactory method available for the rapid<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> carrier animals. Culturing <strong>of</strong> leptospires is the<br />
most definitive test. However this is possible only on fresh<br />
samples where viable leptospires are present. . PCR assays<br />
have the potential to detect both viable and non-viable<br />
leptospires and in recent years, several real-time PCR assays<br />
have been described. Levett et al. (5) developed a real-time<br />
assay using SYBR green chemistry, in which the target was the<br />
gene for the outer-membrane protein LipL32. Expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
LipL32 gene is a unique virulence factor for pathogenic<br />
leptospires. LipL32 is an outer membrane lipoprotein that is<br />
conserved genetically and immunologically in pathogenic<br />
leptospires. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most abundant proteins in Leptospira.<br />
In this study we developed and validated a TaqMan PCR using<br />
novel primers which target a 200 bp fragment <strong>of</strong> the LipL32 gene.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Eight animals that had no evidence <strong>of</strong> exposure to serovar Hardjo<br />
were experimentally infected with L. borgpetersenii serovar<br />
Hardjo type Bovis via conjunctival instillation <strong>of</strong> 2.5 x 10 6<br />
organisms on 3 consecutive days. A total <strong>of</strong> 8 urine samples<br />
were collected from each animal prior to and at intervals up to 40<br />
days after infection. In addition , 24 culture negative urine<br />
samples obtained from herds with no evidence <strong>of</strong> leptospirosis<br />
and 72 kidney samples collected post mortem from animals with<br />
serological evidence <strong>of</strong> Leptospira serovar Hardjo exposure were<br />
used in the study. All samples were cultured using Leptospira<br />
semisolid Tween 80/40 medium and biphasic culture medium<br />
with different variants <strong>of</strong> inhibitory substance addition.<br />
DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures and kidneys using the<br />
QIAamp DNA Mini kits (Qiagen) and from urines using the<br />
QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the<br />
manufacturer’s recommendations.<br />
The TaqMan assay to amplify a 200 bp fragment <strong>of</strong> the LipL32<br />
gene was optimized (primer/probe concentration, annealing<br />
temperature and incubation time with the QuantiTec Probe PCR<br />
Kit (Qiagen) for urine samples and kidney according to the<br />
manufacturer’s instructions. As a control for PCR inhibitors,<br />
specific primers and probe were designed to a housekeeping<br />
gene, β-actin, in cattle for kidney samples but in case <strong>of</strong> urine<br />
samples TaqMan Exogenous Internal Positive Control reagent<br />
(Applied Biosystems) was added to the amplification reaction.<br />
The limit <strong>of</strong> detection was ten template copies. Thirty two urine<br />
samples were used to determined diagnostic specificity (DSp). All<br />
<strong>of</strong> them were culture negative. Also thirty two urine samples and<br />
20 kidney samples that contained serovar Hardjo, as determined<br />
by culture were used to determine diagnostic sensitivity (DSe).<br />
The table below gives the results.<br />
Table 1: Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity <strong>of</strong> the LipL32 realtime<br />
PCR.<br />
Sensitivity % Specificity %<br />
Urine 84.4 90.6<br />
Kidney 95.0 Not tested<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This study evaluated the real-time PCR assay targeting LipL32<br />
gene for detection <strong>of</strong> Leptospira spp in bovine kidney and urine.<br />
The results indicate that the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the diagnostic assay<br />
varies for kidney and urines. Presumably, some false negative<br />
results were caused by substances in the urine that inhibited<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> the DNA, as the exogenous internal positive control<br />
did not show inhibition <strong>of</strong> the amplification reaction.<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> the difficulties associated with isolation <strong>of</strong> leptospires<br />
and the fact that serology does not imitate the carrier or shedding<br />
status, the LipL32 real-time PCR assay may be used as method<br />
for the detection <strong>of</strong> pathogenic leptospires in bovine urine and<br />
kidney samples<br />
References<br />
1. Ellis, W.A., (1984) Bovine Leptospirosis in the tropics: Prevalence,<br />
Pathogenesis and Control. Pre Vet Med 2: 411-421.<br />
2. Ellis, W.A., O’Brien, J.J., Bryson, D.G., Mackie, D.P., (1985) Bovine<br />
leptospirosis: some clinical features <strong>of</strong> serovar Hardjo infection. Vet Rec<br />
117: 101-104.<br />
3. Ellis, W.A., Songer, J.G., Montgomery, J., Cassells, J.A., (1986)<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo in the genital and<br />
urinary tracts <strong>of</strong> non-pregnant cattle. Vet Rec 118: 11-13.<br />
4. Ellis, W.A., (1994) Leptospirosis as a cause <strong>of</strong> reproductive failure. Vet<br />
Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 10: 463-478.<br />
5. Levett, P.N., Morey R.E., Galloway R.L., Turner D.E., Steigerwalt A.G.,<br />
Mayer L.W. (2005) Detection <strong>of</strong> pathogenic leptospires by real-time<br />
quantitative PCR. J Med Microbiol 54: 45-49.<br />
The real time PCR was tested against a panel <strong>of</strong> bacterial<br />
species known to be ruminant pathogens to determine the<br />
analytical specificity <strong>of</strong> the assay. The analytical sensitivity was<br />
calculated using a dilution series <strong>of</strong> target DNA. A genome size <strong>of</strong><br />
3.9 Mb was used to determine the genomic equivalent (GE) per<br />
microlitre <strong>of</strong> the purified DNA. The diagnostic sensitivity and<br />
specificity <strong>of</strong> the assay was determined by testing samples with<br />
only known culture status.<br />
Results<br />
The LipL32 target was amplified from 35 strains tested which<br />
belonged to 6 pathogenic leptospiral species (L.interrogans,<br />
L.borgpetersenil, L.kirschneri, L. santarosai, L.noguchii, L. weilii).<br />
The non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa, intermediate L. fainei and<br />
other 20 bovine pathogens included were not amplified.