Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
S3 - O - 10<br />
DIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF SUID HERPESVIRUS 1 INFECTION IN WILD BOAR<br />
Adolf Steinrigl, Sandra Revilla-Fernández, Eveline Wodak, Zoltán Bagó, Friedrich Schmoll<br />
AGES Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Mödling, Austria<br />
SuHV-1, wild boar, prevalence, molecular characterization<br />
Introduction<br />
Many infectious diseases that are strictly controlled in livestock<br />
may remain unnoticed in wild animals, posing the risk <strong>of</strong> entering<br />
domestic animal populations with potentially devastating<br />
consequences. Suid herpesvirus 1 (SuHV-1), the causative agent<br />
<strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease (AD), was eradicated from domestic pig<br />
populations in many European countries, including Austria. At the<br />
same time, SuHV-1 infection is common in European wild boar,<br />
as shown by a number <strong>of</strong> studies, reporting detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />
DNA or antibodies in wild boar (1). An additional indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
SuHV-1 presence in wild boar are occasional cases <strong>of</strong> AD in<br />
hunting dogs, usually in close connection to hunting events (2).<br />
Recently, we reported about the first detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />
Austrian wild boar and the molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />
field isolates from wild boar and hunting dogs (3).<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the Wild Animal Survey 2011, a nationwide study<br />
that was partly financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Health, additional sera and tissue samples from Austrian wild<br />
boar were collected and analysed, with the aim to provide a<br />
representative estimate <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> both, SuHV-1 DNA<br />
and antibodies, in Austrian wild boar. This work shows the results<br />
<strong>of</strong> this survey and reflects our experiences with detection and<br />
molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in wild boar.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Wild boar tissues and sera were sampled according to a survey<br />
design that was based on recent wild boar hunting bag statistics.<br />
Anti-SuHV-1 gB ELISA, real-time PCR (qPCR), amplification and<br />
sequencing <strong>of</strong> the SuHV-1 glycoprotein C coding region,<br />
phylogenetic analysis and virus isolation were performed as<br />
described previously (3).<br />
Results<br />
From April 2011 to January <strong>2012</strong>, tissues from 298 wild boars<br />
were sampled, corresponding to 78% <strong>of</strong> the scheduled sample<br />
size for the whole country. Wild boar sera <strong>of</strong> sufficient amount<br />
and quality were available from 259 animals. Results <strong>of</strong><br />
serological and virological screening are shown in Table 1. All<br />
qPCR positive wild boars were adult females at 2-4 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> them was also serologically positive, while the other two<br />
animals were seronegative.<br />
Table 1: Results <strong>of</strong> serological (ELISA) and virological (qPCR)<br />
screening <strong>of</strong> Austrian wild boars<br />
Samples Samples Prevalence<br />
tested positive<br />
ELISA 259 59 22.8%<br />
qPCR 298 3 1.0%<br />
Virus was successfully isolated from one <strong>of</strong> the qPCR-positive,<br />
yet seronegative, wild boars: tissue homogenate from a qPCRpositive<br />
tonsil was inoculated onto PK15 cells, resulting in<br />
massive cytopathic effect within 24 hours post inoculation. An<br />
attempt to isolate virus from the other two qPCR positive animals<br />
was unsuccessful. Phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 gC<br />
sequences amplified from the three qPCR positive wild boars<br />
sampled in 2011 showed that all three animals hosted virus that<br />
was identical in gC sequence and belonged to one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
previously described lineages <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 (3), which are currently<br />
present in Austria (Figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Neighbour Joining tree, based on a 639 bp alignment <strong>of</strong><br />
the SuHV-1 partial gC coding region. Sequences were amplified<br />
from wild boars (WB), hunting dogs (HD) and from a domestic pig<br />
(DP). Year <strong>of</strong> isolation is in brackets. Numbers along the<br />
branches indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> 1000 bootstrap replicates.<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The presented study confirms the presence <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />
Austrian wild boar. SuHV-1 seroprevalence detected during the<br />
Wild Animal Survey 2011 was lower than that previously<br />
described (3), which is probably due to the more representative<br />
sampling strategy applied for the current study. In contrast to the<br />
high numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars with detectable SuHV-1 antibodies,<br />
SuHV-1 DNA was detected by qPCR in only a few animals.<br />
Furthermore, Cq-values <strong>of</strong> qPCR-positive tissue pools or<br />
individual organs were relatively high (30 - 38 Cq), indicating a<br />
low viral load in these tissues. This is also supported by our<br />
previous observation <strong>of</strong> weak immunohistochemistry signals in<br />
qPCR positive tissues (3) and by the fact that virus isolation was<br />
positive in a single case only. In summary, our results indicate<br />
that most SuHV-1 infected wild boars harbour virus in a latent<br />
form, whereas only a small proportion <strong>of</strong> infected wild boars is<br />
actually shedding virus and may infect other susceptible animals.<br />
This is also the most likely explanation for the relatively rare<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> AD in hunting dogs, despite rising numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars<br />
in many European countries and the frequent involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
hunting dogs in wild boar hunting. Despite the fact that only few<br />
potentially virus shedding wild boars were found in this study,<br />
direct contact between wild boars and domestic pigs could result<br />
in SuHV-1 transmission. Feeding <strong>of</strong> wild boar intestines to<br />
domestic animals, especially pigs, dogs and cats, is another<br />
reasonable possibility <strong>of</strong> transmission and must be strictly<br />
discouraged.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This study was financially supported in part by the Austrian<br />
Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. The excellent technical assistance <strong>of</strong><br />
the laboratory staff <strong>of</strong> the Departments for Molecular Biology,<br />
Virology and Electron Microscopy, and Pathology is<br />
acknowledged.<br />
References<br />
1. Müller T, Hahn EC, Tottewitz F, Kramer M, Klupp BG, Mettenleiter TC,<br />
Freuling C (2011). Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: a global perspective.<br />
Arch. Virol., 156, 1691-705.<br />
2. Cay AB, Letellier C (2009). Isolation <strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease virus from<br />
two hunting dogs in Belgium after hunting wild boar. Vlaams<br />
Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 78, 194-195.<br />
3. Steinrigl A, Revilla-Fernández S, Kolodziejek J, Wodak E, Bagó Z,<br />
Nowotny N, Schmoll F, Köfer J (2011). Detection and molecular<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> Suid herpesvirus type 1 in Austrian wild boar and<br />
hunting dogs. Vet Microbiol., Dec 30. [Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print]