22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S3 - O - 10<br />

DIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF SUID HERPESVIRUS 1 INFECTION IN WILD BOAR<br />

Adolf Steinrigl, Sandra Revilla-Fernández, Eveline Wodak, Zoltán Bagó, Friedrich Schmoll<br />

AGES Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Mödling, Austria<br />

SuHV-1, wild boar, prevalence, molecular characterization<br />

Introduction<br />

Many infectious diseases that are strictly controlled in livestock<br />

may remain unnoticed in wild animals, posing the risk <strong>of</strong> entering<br />

domestic animal populations with potentially devastating<br />

consequences. Suid herpesvirus 1 (SuHV-1), the causative agent<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease (AD), was eradicated from domestic pig<br />

populations in many European countries, including Austria. At the<br />

same time, SuHV-1 infection is common in European wild boar,<br />

as shown by a number <strong>of</strong> studies, reporting detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />

DNA or antibodies in wild boar (1). An additional indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

SuHV-1 presence in wild boar are occasional cases <strong>of</strong> AD in<br />

hunting dogs, usually in close connection to hunting events (2).<br />

Recently, we reported about the first detection <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />

Austrian wild boar and the molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1<br />

field isolates from wild boar and hunting dogs (3).<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the Wild Animal Survey 2011, a nationwide study<br />

that was partly financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Health, additional sera and tissue samples from Austrian wild<br />

boar were collected and analysed, with the aim to provide a<br />

representative estimate <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> both, SuHV-1 DNA<br />

and antibodies, in Austrian wild boar. This work shows the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> this survey and reflects our experiences with detection and<br />

molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in wild boar.<br />

Materials & methods<br />

Wild boar tissues and sera were sampled according to a survey<br />

design that was based on recent wild boar hunting bag statistics.<br />

Anti-SuHV-1 gB ELISA, real-time PCR (qPCR), amplification and<br />

sequencing <strong>of</strong> the SuHV-1 glycoprotein C coding region,<br />

phylogenetic analysis and virus isolation were performed as<br />

described previously (3).<br />

Results<br />

From April 2011 to January <strong>2012</strong>, tissues from 298 wild boars<br />

were sampled, corresponding to 78% <strong>of</strong> the scheduled sample<br />

size for the whole country. Wild boar sera <strong>of</strong> sufficient amount<br />

and quality were available from 259 animals. Results <strong>of</strong><br />

serological and virological screening are shown in Table 1. All<br />

qPCR positive wild boars were adult females at 2-4 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> them was also serologically positive, while the other two<br />

animals were seronegative.<br />

Table 1: Results <strong>of</strong> serological (ELISA) and virological (qPCR)<br />

screening <strong>of</strong> Austrian wild boars<br />

Samples Samples Prevalence<br />

tested positive<br />

ELISA 259 59 22.8%<br />

qPCR 298 3 1.0%<br />

Virus was successfully isolated from one <strong>of</strong> the qPCR-positive,<br />

yet seronegative, wild boars: tissue homogenate from a qPCRpositive<br />

tonsil was inoculated onto PK15 cells, resulting in<br />

massive cytopathic effect within 24 hours post inoculation. An<br />

attempt to isolate virus from the other two qPCR positive animals<br />

was unsuccessful. Phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 gC<br />

sequences amplified from the three qPCR positive wild boars<br />

sampled in 2011 showed that all three animals hosted virus that<br />

was identical in gC sequence and belonged to one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

previously described lineages <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 (3), which are currently<br />

present in Austria (Figure 1).<br />

Figure 1: Neighbour Joining tree, based on a 639 bp alignment <strong>of</strong><br />

the SuHV-1 partial gC coding region. Sequences were amplified<br />

from wild boars (WB), hunting dogs (HD) and from a domestic pig<br />

(DP). Year <strong>of</strong> isolation is in brackets. Numbers along the<br />

branches indicate the percentage <strong>of</strong> 1000 bootstrap replicates.<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

The presented study confirms the presence <strong>of</strong> SuHV-1 in<br />

Austrian wild boar. SuHV-1 seroprevalence detected during the<br />

Wild Animal Survey 2011 was lower than that previously<br />

described (3), which is probably due to the more representative<br />

sampling strategy applied for the current study. In contrast to the<br />

high numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars with detectable SuHV-1 antibodies,<br />

SuHV-1 DNA was detected by qPCR in only a few animals.<br />

Furthermore, Cq-values <strong>of</strong> qPCR-positive tissue pools or<br />

individual organs were relatively high (30 - 38 Cq), indicating a<br />

low viral load in these tissues. This is also supported by our<br />

previous observation <strong>of</strong> weak immunohistochemistry signals in<br />

qPCR positive tissues (3) and by the fact that virus isolation was<br />

positive in a single case only. In summary, our results indicate<br />

that most SuHV-1 infected wild boars harbour virus in a latent<br />

form, whereas only a small proportion <strong>of</strong> infected wild boars is<br />

actually shedding virus and may infect other susceptible animals.<br />

This is also the most likely explanation for the relatively rare<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> AD in hunting dogs, despite rising numbers <strong>of</strong> wild boars<br />

in many European countries and the frequent involvement <strong>of</strong><br />

hunting dogs in wild boar hunting. Despite the fact that only few<br />

potentially virus shedding wild boars were found in this study,<br />

direct contact between wild boars and domestic pigs could result<br />

in SuHV-1 transmission. Feeding <strong>of</strong> wild boar intestines to<br />

domestic animals, especially pigs, dogs and cats, is another<br />

reasonable possibility <strong>of</strong> transmission and must be strictly<br />

discouraged.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This study was financially supported in part by the Austrian<br />

Federal Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health. The excellent technical assistance <strong>of</strong><br />

the laboratory staff <strong>of</strong> the Departments for Molecular Biology,<br />

Virology and Electron Microscopy, and Pathology is<br />

acknowledged.<br />

References<br />

1. Müller T, Hahn EC, Tottewitz F, Kramer M, Klupp BG, Mettenleiter TC,<br />

Freuling C (2011). Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: a global perspective.<br />

Arch. Virol., 156, 1691-705.<br />

2. Cay AB, Letellier C (2009). Isolation <strong>of</strong> Aujeszky’s disease virus from<br />

two hunting dogs in Belgium after hunting wild boar. Vlaams<br />

Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 78, 194-195.<br />

3. Steinrigl A, Revilla-Fernández S, Kolodziejek J, Wodak E, Bagó Z,<br />

Nowotny N, Schmoll F, Köfer J (2011). Detection and molecular<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> Suid herpesvirus type 1 in Austrian wild boar and<br />

hunting dogs. Vet Microbiol., Dec 30. [Epub ahead <strong>of</strong> print]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!