22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S3 - P - 24<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRUS NEUTRALISATION TEST TO DETECT ANTIBODIES AGAINST<br />

SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS AND FIRST RESULTS IN SUSPECT AND INFECTED HERDS<br />

W.L.A. Loeffen 1 , S. Quak 1 , E. de Boer-Luijtze 1 , W.H.M. van der Poel 1 , R. Bouwstra 2 , R. Maas 1<br />

1<br />

Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Lelystad, The Netherland.<br />

2<br />

Central Veterinary Institute, <strong>of</strong> Wageningen University and Research Centre (CVI-Lelystad), Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, Crisis Management and<br />

Diagnostics, Lelystad, The Netherland.<br />

Schmallenberg, VNT, sensitivity, specificity<br />

Introduction<br />

On the 18th <strong>of</strong> November 2011, a new Orthobunya virus was<br />

reported to be found in Germany (3). This virus was closely<br />

related to Shamonda-, Aino- and Akabane-virus, which all belong<br />

to the Simbu serogroup <strong>of</strong> the genus Orthobunyavirus, family<br />

Bunyaviridae (1). The virus, provisionally called Schmallenberg<br />

virus (SBV), has since been associated with clinical signs <strong>of</strong><br />

decreased milk production, watery diarrhoea, fever and<br />

congenital malformations (3,4,5).<br />

To determine the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the disease and carry out<br />

epidemiological studies, there was a need for a reliable and<br />

robust serological assay. A virus neutralisation test (VNT) was<br />

developed, as this also allows for a (semi)quantitative detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> antibodies against the virus. An initial validation (specificity,<br />

sensitivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and robustness) was<br />

carried out and the test was used in suspect (congenital<br />

malformation, no positive RT-PCR) and infected herds (positive<br />

RT-PCR).<br />

Materials & methods<br />

The VNT was carried out in flat bottomed 96 well micro titre<br />

plates. Serum samples were inactivated for 30 min at 56°C and<br />

from a starting dilution <strong>of</strong> 1:4, two-fold dilutions were made.<br />

Subsequently 500 TCID 50 <strong>of</strong> virus was added to each well. Serum<br />

and virus were pre-incubated at 37°C for 1 to 2 hours to allow<br />

neutralisation <strong>of</strong> the virus. Thereafter, 20,000 cells (VERO cells)<br />

per well were added. Plates were then incubated for 5 days at<br />

37°C and under 5% CO2.<br />

After 5 days, the plates were stained with amido black and read<br />

macroscopically. Wells with 25-100% staining were considered to<br />

have no or limited CPE only. Wells with less than 25% staining<br />

were considered to have extensive or full CPE. In each dilution<br />

series the last well with no or limited CPE was identified and the<br />

sample was assigned a titre that was the reciprocal <strong>of</strong> the dilution<br />

in that well. Control samples were included and a back titration <strong>of</strong><br />

the virus was carried out for each test run.<br />

Initially, 351 blood samples (160 sheep, 191 cattle) from noninfected<br />

animals were tested in the final version <strong>of</strong> the assay.<br />

These samples originated from the Netherlands, from the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2000-2010, before the introduction <strong>of</strong> the Schmallenberg virus.<br />

They were used to set the initial cut-<strong>of</strong>f value in the assay.<br />

Subsequently, 366 samples from suspect herds (being herds in<br />

which congenital malformations were observed, with no<br />

confirmation in the RT-PCR), and infected herds (herds where<br />

the infection was confirmed by RT-PCR).<br />

Results<br />

In serum samples from non-infected sheep, a higher background<br />

was seen than in sera from non-infected cattle (figure 1).<br />

Figure 1: Distribution <strong>of</strong> titres in non-infected sheep (n=160) and<br />

cattle (n=191).<br />

Based on testing 160 sheep and 191 cows, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f values<br />

were set at a titre <strong>of</strong> 16 for sheep and 8 for cattle. Given this cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />

value, a specificity <strong>of</strong> 99.4% in sheep and 99.5% in cattle was<br />

estimated.<br />

Ninety-two percent <strong>of</strong> the cattle and 94% <strong>of</strong> the sheep from<br />

suspect and infected herds scored positive in the VNT. In sheep<br />

no titres <strong>of</strong> 8 and in cattle no titres <strong>of</strong> 4 were observed, thus<br />

clearly separating the peak <strong>of</strong> the positive samples from the peak<br />

<strong>of</strong> the negative samples (figure 2). This again corresponds to a<br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f value <strong>of</strong> 16 and 8 respectively from sheep and cattle, as<br />

determined already by testing serum samples from non-infected<br />

animals. Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay is therefore at least 92% and<br />

94% in cattle and sheep respectively, assuming the worst case<br />

scenario that all were seropositive in reality. However, the clear<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> the negative and positive peak suggests that the<br />

sensitivity for both species is close to 100%.<br />

Figure 2: Distribution <strong>of</strong> titres in goats, sheep and cattle from<br />

suspect (in utero malformations, RT-PCR negative), and infected<br />

herds (infection confirmed by RT-PCR).<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

A very robust VNT was developed with a very high specificity and<br />

sensitivity, both close to 100%, in sheep and cattle. The assay<br />

was shown to be highly repeatable and reproducible (results not<br />

shown). The VNT is easy to perform and can be read<br />

macroscopically, as a result <strong>of</strong> the amido black staining. With the<br />

current, optimized protocol, this staining results most <strong>of</strong> the times<br />

in a very sharp transition between wells with and without CPE.<br />

This makes it easy and very fast to read the plates, with a high<br />

reliability and reproducibility.<br />

In suspect and infected herds more than 90% <strong>of</strong> the sheep and<br />

cattle tested seropositive, suggesting that within herds with<br />

congenital malformations, the infection is wide spread with a high<br />

within-herd seroprevalence. High seroprevalences, both on a<br />

regional level, but also within herds, with and without obvious<br />

clinical signs, are not uncommon for viruses related to SBV. A<br />

very high overall seroprevalence <strong>of</strong> 70% in cattle was recently<br />

also reported in the Netherlands, using this VNT (2).<br />

References<br />

1. Causey OR, Kemp GE, Causey CE, Lee VH. 1972. Ann Trop Med<br />

Parasitol 66: 357-62.<br />

2. Elbers ARW, Loeffen WLA, Quak S, et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Emerg Infect Dis.<br />

3. H<strong>of</strong>fmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, et al. <strong>2012</strong>. Emerg Infect Dis.<br />

4. Muskens J, Smolenaars AJG, Van der Poel WHM, et al. <strong>2012</strong> Tijdschr<br />

Diergeneeskd. 137: 112-5.<br />

5 .Van den Brom R, Luttikholt SJM, Lievaart-Peteron K,et al. <strong>2012</strong><br />

Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 137: 106-11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!